Camera Resolution Explained



Similar documents
TVL - The True Measurement of Video Quality

Ultra-High Resolution Digital Mosaics

What is a DSLR and what is a compact camera? And newer versions of DSLR are now mirrorless

Digital Photography. Digital Cameras and Digital Photography. Your camera. Topics Your Camera Exposure Shutter speed and f-stop Image Size Editing

Nikon f/2.8g VR II versus Nikon f/4g VR

Shutter Speed in Digital Photography

Different lenses, different applications.

MassArt Studio Foundation: Visual Language Digital Media Cookbook, Fall 2013

A Photographer s. E-Guide To Making Sharp. Photographs

Understanding Resolution and the meaning of DPI, PPI, SPI, & LPI

Using the Olympus C4000 REV. 04/2006

Digital Camera Glossary

Digital Image Requirements for New Online US Visa Application

PHOTO RESIZING & QUALITY MAINTENANCE

Untangling the megapixel lens myth! Which is the best lens to buy? And how to make that decision!

What Resolution Should Your Images Be?

Preparing Images for PowerPoint, the Web, and Publication

The Trade-off between Image Resolution and Field of View: the Influence of Lens Selection

Get the Best Digital Images Possible. What s it all about anyway?

Contents.

The Basics of Digital Photography and How to Take Better Pictures. Instructor: Kate Key Kate Key Photography

What resolution should I use? Resizing an Image for Print

Digital Photography Composition. Kent Messamore 9/8/2013

Technical Tip Image Resolutions for Digital Cameras, Scanners, and Printing

Diversifying VRC Services within a studio department: The Portfolio Photography Room

Understanding Depth Of Field, Aperture, and Shutter Speed Supplement to Mastering the Nikon D7000

Flat-Field IR Mega-Pixel Lens

Photography and photomontage in landscape and visual impact assessment. Landscape Institute Advice Note 01/11

THE NEW DIGITAL MANTRA: RESOLUTION, RESOLUTION, RESOLUTION!

Understanding Exposure for Better Photos Now

Colorado State University. Guide for 4-H Photography Judges

Aperture, Shutter speed and iso

Scanners and How to Use Them

Lifehacker Night School "The Basics of Photography"

Tips for better photos

Image quality like never before

Tips on Photography What Kind of Images? Photos and more Uses - A good picture speaks 1,000 words

The Ultimate Guide For Buying Your First Digital SLR

Photography of Cultural Heritage items

The New Canon PowerShot S95

Technologies Explained PowerShot G12

Links. Blog. Great Images for Papers and Presentations 5/24/2011. Overview. Find help for entire process Quick link Theses and Dissertations

Over Exposed Under Exposed

Introduction to Digital Resolution

Balanced Optical SteadyShot has brought about amazing improvements to image stabilisation

4. CAMERA ADJUSTMENTS

A Beginner's Guide to Simple Photography Concepts: ISO, Aperture, Shutter Speed Depth of Field (DOF) and Exposure Compensation

DSLR Astrophotography

ZEISS Compact Prime and Zoom lenses Flexibility and performance in a winning combination.

Technologies Explained PowerShot G1 X

PDF Created with deskpdf PDF Writer - Trial ::

18-270mm F/ Di II VC PZD for Canon, Nikon (Model B008) mm F/ Di II PZD for Sony (Model B008)

picture real beauty Capture real beauty with the one you love

Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* FE 4/24-70 ZA OSS Review. E.J. Peiker

Basic Manual Control of a DSLR Camera

Choosing a digital camera for your microscope John C. Russ, Materials Science and Engineering Dept., North Carolina State Univ.

Preparing TIFF-images for publication

WHITE PAPER. Are More Pixels Better? Resolution Does it Really Matter?

Making High Dynamic Range (HDR) Panoramas with Hugin

AF 70~300 mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2 (Model A17)

DSLR CAMERA GUIDE Electronic Media Communications University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College

Learning the basics of digital photography will help you can take great photos for your personal use.

ZEISS Education Program Price Information

Panoramic and High Resolution Photography. Max Lyons

Whitepaper. Image stabilization improving camera usability

A presentation to Aberdare Camera Club

Introduction to Digital Photography Class 1

One Week to Better Photography

The true reasons for a full frame camera. LumoLabs (fl)

Rodenstock Photo Optics

Beginners Guide to Digital Camera Settings

This course description will be replaced with one currently under review by College Council.

Digital for Beginners.

2. Using a Visible Light Blocking Filter on a standard Digital Camera

WHO CARES ABOUT RESOLUTION?

SCANNING, RESOLUTION, AND FILE FORMATS

ACTION AND PEOPLE PHOTOGRAPHY

Digital Photography 1

A series Metric (cm) Imperial (inch)

White Paper. Fisheye Cameras in Surveillance Applications

Improve your flower photography

Creating a Planogram Database

Pre Evaluation Digital Photography 2005

Lecture 12: Cameras and Geometry. CAP 5415 Fall 2010

TELEPHOTO TECHNIQUE. Shutter Release, January 2006

Digital Photography for the Fire Investigator

SP AF 17~50 mm F/2.8 XR Di-II LD Aspherical [IF] (Model A16)

Schneider Kreuznach PC Tilt/Shift Lenses

Professional. Setting Guide

Making TIFF and EPS files from Drawing, Word Processing, PowerPoint and Graphing Programs

CONTENTS. Page 3 Badge requirements. Page 4 Portraits. Page 5 Still life. Page 6 Landscapes and seascapes. Page 7 Sport or action shots

digital backs Cable free operation with all V System cameras including 202FA/203FE/205FCC cameras.

Sigma mm zoom compared with. Canon mm zoom

Testing Results for Advanced Cameras Mirrorless vs. DSLRs (Advanced) Final Takeaway for Advanced Mirrorless Cameras...

The world s fastest D-SLR remastered

Guide to Art Photography in Museums / revised, October 6, Robert Baldwin Associate Professor of Art History Connecticut College

10 Tips to Better Image Editing with FlexiSIGN By Mark A. Rugen, Certified FlexiSIGN Instructor SA International,

Contents OVERVIEW WORKFLOW PROBLEM. SOLUTION. FEATURE. BENEFIT 4 5 EASY STEPS TO CALIBRATE YOUR LENSES 5

MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA ADVANTAGES

This presentation is on standards and best practices related to the digitization of photographs.

Transcription:

Camera Resolution Explained FEBRUARY 17, 2015 BY NASIM MANSUROV Although the megapixel race has been going on since digital cameras had been invented, the last few years in particular have seen a huge increase in resolution we have seen everything from 41 megapixel camera phones to now 50.6 megapixel full-frame DSLR cameras. It seems like we have already reached the theoretical maximum for handling noise at high ISOs with the current generation sensor technology, so the manufacturers are now focusing their efforts in packing more resolution, while keeping sensor sizes the same in order to lure more customers to upgrade to the latest and greatest. In this article, I will try to explain some basic terminology in regards to resolution and hopefully help our readers in understanding camera resolution better. NIKON D3S @ 500mm, ISO 1600, 1/800, f/8 Before we get started, let s first talk about what resolution impacts and then we will address some of the common misconceptions. 1) Camera Resolution: What it Affects In digital photography, camera resolution is associated with a number of different factors: Print Size usually the most important factor. Basically, the more resolution, the larger the potential print size. Printing from digital images is accomplished by squeezing a certain number of

Pixels Per Inch (PPI). A high quality print with good details usually involves printing at around 300 PPI, so the size of the potential print is calculated by taking image width and height and dividing them by the PPI number. For example, a 12.1 MP resolution image from the Nikon D700 has image dimensions of 4,256 x 2,832. If you wanted to create a high quality print with lots of details at 300 PPI, the print size would be limited to approximately 14.2 x 9.4 print (4,256 / 300 = 14.2 and 2,832 / 300 = 9.4). Larger prints would be possible, but they would require you to either drop the PPI to a lower number, or use special third party tools that use complex algorithms to upscale or up-sample an image to a higher resolution, which do not always yield good results. In short, higher resolution is usually more desirable for the ability to print larger. Cropping Options the higher the resolution, the more room there is to potentially crop images. Although many photographers avoid heavy cropping, sometimes it is necessary to focus on the desired subject(s). For example, sports and wildlife photographers often resort to cropping, because they might not be able to get closer to action, but at the same time do not want their final images to contain unnecessary clutter surrounding the main subject(s). As a result, they often employ heavy cropping, which ultimately reduces resolution, which is why they tend to desire as much resolution as possible and practical. Down-sampling as I have previously explained in my article on the benefits of high resolution sensors, the higher the resolution, the better the options for resizing or down-sampling images. As I will explain further down below, modern high resolution cameras have similar performance as their lower resolution counterparts, but their main advantages are the ability to down-sample to lower resolution to decrease the amount of noise and when shooting at low ISOs, the ability to yield larger prints. Display Size during the past 10+ years, we have seen a significant progress is display technology. Monitors, TVs, projectors, phones, hand-held and other devices have seen big increases in resolution and the increased space on those devices naturally led to the need to show higher resolution images with more details. 4K monitors and TVs (over 8 megapixels) are getting more popular and common, which puts more burden on cameras to yield images with enough details to showcase on such high resolution devices. Judging from the above, it seems like higher resolution is always better. But that s certainly not the case, because it is not just about the quantity of pixels, but their quality. Further down below, I will explain what this means in regards to sensor size, pixel size, lens resolving power and technique. 2) Camera Resolution: How Much More is X MP vs Y MP? When Nikon first introduced its D800 / D800E cameras with 36.3 MP resolution full-frame image sensors, many photographers were still shooting with 12.1 MP full-frame cameras like Nikon D700 and D3 / D3s.

Doing simple math, many claimed that the 36.3 MP sensor represented 3 times more resolution (12.1 MP x 3 = 36.3 MP) and some wrongfully assumed that upgrading to a camera like D800 would yield 3 times bigger prints. While the total number of effective pixels indeed is three times larger when comparing 36.3 MP vs 12.1 MP, the difference in linear resolution is actually far smaller. That s because sensor resolution is calculated by taking the total number of horizontal pixels and multiplying it by the total number of vertical pixels, similar to how you calculate the area of a rectangle. In the case of the D700, which has an image size of 4,256 x 2,832, the sensor resolution equals 12,052,992, which rounds to approximately 12.1 megapixels. If we look at the Nikon D800, its image size is 7,360 x 4,912 and hence the sensor resolution is 36,152,320, roughly 36.15 megapixels (the discrepancy between 36.15 vs 36.3 comes from the fact that some of the pixels, such as optical black and dummy, around the edges of the sensor are used to provide additional data). Now if we compare the total number of horizontal pixels between the D700 and the D800, it is 4,256 vs 7,360 an increase of only 73%, not 200% as wrongfully assumed by many. What does this translate to? Basically, if you could print a detailed 14.2 x 9.4 print at 300 PPI with the D700, upgrading to the D800 would potentially result in a 24.5 x 16.4 print at the same 300 PPI. Hence, moving up from 12 MP to 36 MP would translate to 73% and not 3x larger prints. Again, it is easy to confuse total area with horizontal width, so it is important to understand the difference here. In order to yield twice larger prints at the same PPI, you would need to multiply sensor resolution by 4. For example, if you own a D700 and you are wondering what kind of sensor resolution you would need to print 2x larger, you multiply 12.1 MP (sensor resolution) x 4, which translates to a 48.4 MP sensor. So if you were to move up to say the latest Canon 5DS DSLR that has a 50.6 MP sensor, you would get prints a bit larger than 2x in comparison. To understand these differences in resolution, it is best to take a look at the below comparison of different popular sensor resolutions of modern digital cameras from 12.1 MP to 50.6 MP:

As you can see, despite the fact that sensor resolution numbers increase significantly when going from something like 12.1 MP to 50.6 MP, the actual difference in horizontal width is much less pronounced. But if you were to look at the total area differences, then the differences are indeed significant you could take 4 prints from the D700, stack them together and still be short when compared to a 50.6 MP image, as shown below:

Keep all this in mind when comparing cameras and thinking about differences in resolution. 3) Sensor Size, Pixel Size and Differences in Resolution As you may already know, sensor resolution is far from being the most important camera feature and a lot of that has to do with the physical size of the camera sensor and its pixels. You might see two cameras with the same resolution, but one might have a sensor that is significantly larger than the other. For example, the Nikon D7100 has a 24.1 MP sensor, while the Nikon D750 has a 24.3 MP sensor both have similar sensor resolution. However, if you look at the physical sizes of sensors on the two, the Nikon D7100 has a sensor size of 23.5 x 15.6mm, while the sensor on the Nikon D750 measures 35.9 x 24.0mm 52% larger in linear width or 2.3x larger in total sensor area. What does this mean? Despite the fact that both cameras yield images of similar width (6000 x 4000 on the D7100 vs 6016 x 4016 on the D750), the physical size of each pixel on the D750 sensor is 52% / 1.52x larger in comparison. That s how the two cameras are able to have similar resolution and hence can potentially make similar size prints (more on this below). If we divide sensor width by image width, we can calculate the approximate size of each pixel. In the case of the D7100, taking 23.5 and dividing by 6000 yields approximately 3.92 µm, while dividing 35.9 on the Nikon D750 by 6016 yields approximately 5.97 µm pixel size. So what difference does pixel size make in images? In essence, larger pixels can collect more light than smaller pixels, which translates to better image quality and handling of noise per pixel. However, there are a few caveats you need to keep in mind:

Differences are small when there is abundance of light (low ISO levels) if shooting close to base ISO such as ISO 100-400, there is usually little difference in noise performance between pixels (for up to 2x pixel size differences, but not larger). In the case of D7100 and D750, both yield practically noise-free images from ISO 100 to 400. However, there is a noticeable difference in performance at higher ISOs starting from ISO 800, in D750 s favor. So larger pixels tend to be more suitable for lowlight environments where higher ISO levels will often be used. If sensor size is the same but resolution is different, smaller pixels do not necessarily translate to more noise a sensor with more resolution means you could print larger. Since noise is usually not evaluated on a per-pixel basis, but rather on equivalent print sizes, you would have to print at the same size to evaluate noise from two different resolution sensors. For example, the Nikon D750 has a 24.3 MP sensor, while the newer Nikon D810 has a 36.3 MP sensor. Since the D810 has more resolution, its pixel size is noticeably smaller than on the D750 (4.88 µm vs 5.97 µm), which means that it is expected to see more noise if you zoom in to 100% view. However, if we were to make equivalent size prints from both, we will have to resize images from the D810 to match the print size of the D750 by reducing 36.3 MP to 24.3 MP, which at the same print size would show similar noise. Take a look at the below images from both cameras, with the D810 image resized to 24.3 MP (left: Nikon D750, right: Nikon D810, ISO 1600):

As you can see, both images look pretty similar in terms of noise, although the D810 is technically supposed to have more noticeable noise due to having smaller pixels. If I replaced the D750 with the 16 MP Df or D4s, the resulting images would look similar at 16 MP. Given the above, how would an image from the 38 MP Nokia 808 PureView camera phone compare to an image from the 36.3 MP Nikon D810 full-frame DSLR camera? Well, there is simply no comparison, as we are talking about a small sensor measuring 13.3 x 10.67mm on the phone, versus a 35mm DSLR sensor measuring 35.9 x 24mm a difference of 270% in sensor width or 6x in total area. So despite the fact that the Nokia 808 has technically more resolution than the D810, its pixel size is a puny 1.4 µm compared to 4.88 µm on the D810, which will make images from the phone camera look like mud when compared to images from the D810. Although the Nokia 808 PureView can potentially make larger prints, the D810 will obviously produce much better quality prints with more detail, because the overall camera system is capable of taking advantage of the full 36.3 MP sensor, whereas the Nokia phone s real resolution is much worse in comparison. This shows that there is much more to resolution and printing than just pure megapixels. Let s now jump to Lens Sharpness and Lens Resolving Power. ILCE-7M2 + FE 24-70mm F4 ZA OSS @ 70mm, ISO 6400, 10/1, f/5.6

4) Lens Sharpness / Resolving Power Big megapixel numbers on the sensor are useless, if the lens is too poor to resolve enough detail to provide data for each pixel on the sensor. The same Nokia 808 PureView might have 38 MP resolution, but how much detail can it actually show at pixel level when compared to the 36 MP D810 with a solid full-frame lens attached to it? Not a whole lot. So its real performance in terms of resolution is far less than 38 MP, actually closer to 5 MP in comparison, maybe even less. It makes sense, because you cannot compare a small sensor camera with a tiny lens to a full-frame DSLR and a high-end lens with amazing resolving power. Another problem is diffraction smaller sensor cameras will be diffraction-limited at much larger apertures, which will also effectively reduce sharpness and effective resolution. When comparing same size sensor cameras with different resolutions, you have to keep in mind that the camera with more resolution will always put more strain on the lens in terms of resolving power. A lens might do quite well on a 12 MP camera, but fail to resolve enough details on a 24 MP or a 36 MP camera, essentially throwing away the high resolution advantage. In some cases, you might be better off not moving up to a higher resolution camera to deal less with other issues, such as the need for more storage and processing power. Although manufacturers like Nikon and Canon have been actively releasing lenses specifically designed for higher resolution sensors, you might have to re-evaluate every lens purchased in the past to see which ones will provide adequate resolving power for the high resolution sensor and which ones will need to be replaced. In many cases older lenses will suffer from poor mid-frame and corner performance, which might not be desirable for certain types of photography such as landscapes and architecture.

FUJIFILM X-PRO1 @ 35mm, ISO 200, 1/90, f/5.6 5) Technical Skill You might have the highest resolution camera on the market and the best lens that is able to take a full advantage of the sensor and still end up with poorly-executed images that lack detail to make good quality prints. Aside from being able to take advantage of good light and carefully frame / compose the scene, you also need to have good technical skills to yield tack sharp images. High resolution cameras essentially amplify everything greatly, whether it is camera shake caused by poor hand-holding technique, shutter vibrations originating from the camera, poor focusing technique, unstable tripod, slight wind or other various causes of blur in images. So if you do decide to move up to a much higher resolution sensor, you might need to spend some time learning proper technique to capture images. You might have to re-evaluate your minimum shutter speed for hand-holding, use of tripod, use of live view for critical focus, use of lenses and optimum apertures and more. Because if you don t, you might be wasting the potential of your camera sensor Kilde: https://photographylife.com/camera-resolution-explained