Avian Management Indicator Species on Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands



Similar documents
POINT TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES

Avian surveys and monitoring

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Resources, Publications, Tools, Input from AWCC

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

How To Know What You Want To Know

Recommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions of Alberta

NATIONAL GRASSLANDS MANAGEMENT A PRIMER

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

Review of the Availability and Accuracy. of Information about Forests: Phase I Report

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

First Annual Centennial Strategy for. Yucca House National Monument

Monitoring as a Means to Focus Research and Conservation - The Grassland Bird Monitoring Example 1

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Why Count Birds? (cont.)

Burrowing Owl Distribution Modeling

LESSON 2 Carrying Capacity: What is a Viable Population? A Lesson on Numbers and Space

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

Bird census and survey techniques

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs). Guidelines for their Identification, Selection and Designation

Peninsular Florida Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Charter. Background

Niki L. Pace, Research Counsel Mississippi Alabama Sea Grant Legal Program September 15, 2009

2015 Monarch Butterfly Conservation Fund Grant Slate

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Public Land Management and Interdependent Collection of Programs

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

Communities and Fire Restoration. The Role of Communities in Restoring Fire as a Natural Process

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

Integrating Landscape Restoration and CWPP

U.S. SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL

Pledge Supporting NJ Wildlife Action Plan

Estimating Asian Elephant Population in Dindugul, Kodaikanal and Theni Forest Divisions, Western Ghats Tamil Nadu

The importance of Lebanon for the migratory soaring birds & the flyway. April Bassima Khatib SPNL Assistant Director General

Department of the Interior. Departmental Manual

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

AGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace.

SAMPLE VISION, MISSION AND PURPOSE STATEMENTS

User's Guide. Distance 6.0 Beta 5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment

Ecosystem Restoration in British Columbia An Overview. Greg Anderson Provincial Ecosystem Restoration Manager 2009

Black Tern Distribution Modeling

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

ECONOMIC INJURY LEVEL (EIL) AND ECONOMIC THRESHOLD (ET) CONCEPTS IN PEST MANAGEMENT. David G. Riley University of Georgia Tifton, Georgia, USA

Climate Change: A Local Focus on a Global Issue Newfoundland and Labrador Curriculum Links

Forest-Climate Working Group:

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Division of Forestry

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Fire, Forest History, and Ecological Restoration of Ponderosa Pine Forests at Mount Rushmore, South Dakota

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Drought Response Program: Draft Funding Criteria for Review and Comment

A RETURN ON INVESTMENT: THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF COLORADO S CONSERVATION EASEMENTS

Burrowing Owl Use of Cimarron, Comanche, and Rita Blanca National Grasslands

Pilot Title: Wyoming Interagency Spatial Database & Online Management Tools for Wildlife

Northern Long-eared Bat - Interim Final 4(d) Rule Questions and Answers

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

Chapter 3. Alternatives

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

A Method of Population Estimation: Mark & Recapture

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION

Town of Snowmass Village. PO Box Or Delivered To: 1 P a g e

Overview and Example Application of the Landscape Treatment Designer

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

Sullivan s Island Bird Banding and Environmental Education Program. Sarah Harper Díaz, MA and Jennifer Tyrrell, MS

The Albert J. and Mary Jane Black Institute for Environmental Studies

ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION A MEANS OF CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND SUSTAINING LIVELIHOODS

Patterns of Bat Fatality at Wind Development Facilities. Edward B. Arnett, Bat Conservation International

City of Fort Collins Water Supply and Demand Management Policy

Quantitative Inventory Uncertainty

Risk Management Procedure For The Derivation and Use Of Soil Exposure Point Concentrations For Unrestricted Use Determinations

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT FUNDING

The Urban Heat Island in Phoenix: Impacts on Neighborhoods

Transcription:

Avian Management Indicator Species on Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands September 2008 In Cooperation With: Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory PO Box 1232 Brighton, CO 80601-1232 303.659.4348 www.rmbo.org Tech. Report # M-MCB-USFS07-05

Mission: To conserve birds and their habitats Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Core Values: (Our goals for achieving our mission) 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. RMBO accomplishes its mission by: Partnering with state and federal natural resource agencies, private landowners, schools, and other nonprofits for conservation. Studying bird responses to habitat conditions, ecological processes, and management actions to provide scientific information that guides bird conservation efforts. Monitoring long-term trends in bird populations for our region. Providing active, experiential, education programs that create an awareness and appreciation for birds. Sharing the latest information in land management and bird conservation practices. Developing voluntary, working partnerships with landowners to engage them in conservation. Working across political and jurisdictional boundaries including, counties, states, regions, and national boundaries. Our conservation work emphasizes the Western United States, including the Great Plains, as well as Latin America. Creating informed publics and building consensus for bird conservation needs. Suggested Citation: Jennifer A. Blakesley. 2008. Avian Management Indicator Species on the Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands. Supplemental Report M-MCB- USFS07-05. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO. 6 pp. Cover Photo: Long-billed Curlew. Dave Herr, U.S. Forest Service. Contact Information: Jennifer Blakesley (Jennifer.blakesley@rmbo.org) Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 14500 Lark Bunting Lane PO Box 1232 Brighton, CO 80601-1232 303-659-4348

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory (RMBO) conducted bird surveys within the Shortgrass Prairie Bird Conservation Region (BCR 18) and within Grasslands of Colorado in 2001-2007, under three sampling designs (Beason et al. 2008). The Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands (CCNG) designated three birds as Management Indicator Species (MIS): The Lesser Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus), Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus), and Bullock s Oriole (Icterus bullockii). No Lesser Prairie-Chickens were detected on either National Grassland. No Long-billed Curlews were detected on Cimarron National Grassland. Fourteen to eighty-six Curlews were detected on Comanche National Grassland each year. However, estimation of population size using Distance sampling requires 60-80 independent observations of a species to generate a detection function, and the majority of Curlews were detected in flocks. Therefore, I was able to estimate only an average annual density of Long-billed Curlews. Bullock s Orioles were detected in insufficient numbers on both National Grasslands to estimate population density. This report summarizes the results of all point transect surveys conducted by RMBO on Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands with respect to avian MIS. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the U.S. Forest Service, through a challenge cost share agreement between the Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region and Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory (03-CS-11021300-023 Modification number 4). I sincerely thank Robert Skorkowsky and John Sidle of the U.S. Forest Service for their support of avian monitoring programs throughout Colorado and regionally. Thanks also to the many individual field technicians who collected the avian point count data used in this report. Conserving Birds and their Habitats i

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... i Acknowledgements... i Table of Contents... ii Introduction... 1 Methods... 1 Study Area... 1 Field Methods... 2 Data Analysis...Error! Bookmark not defined. Results... 3 Discussion and Recommendations... 5 Literature Cited... 6 Conserving Birds and their Habitats ii

INTRODUCTION Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory (RMBO) surveyed birds in Grasslands in Colorado and within the Shortgrass Prairie Bird Conservation Region (BCR 18), including the Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands, in 1999-2007. RMBO conducted surveys under two monitoring programs that used different sampling frames. Our objectives were to monitor population trends and distributions of breeding birds. RMBO established the first program in 1998 to monitor bird populations throughout Colorado (Monitoring Colorado s Birds; MCB). Sampling design was based on habitat strata, with 30 transects randomly located in each of 11 habitats, including grasslands. RMBO sampled bird populations in grassland habitat in 1999-2005. In 2007, we used a new, spatially balanced sampling frame to select transects within the Colorado portion BCR18. We surveyed 1-3 MCB transects within the Comanche National Grassland each year. Because Cimarron National Grassland lies outside of Colorado, it contained no MCB transects. RMBO established a separate program in 2001 to monitor birds at the scale of BCR 18, including portions of Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. Under this program, the sampling unit was a legal Section (1 mile x 1 mile, based on the Public Land Survey System), and sampling was conducted from roads. We surveyed 1-31 sections within Cimarron National Grassland and 40-132 sections within Comanche National Grassland each year. The Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands (CCNG) designated three birds as Management Indicator Species (MIS): The Lesser Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus), Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus), and Bullock s Oriole (Icterus bullockii). Herein, I present counts of surveys conducted, MIS individual birds detected, and an average density estimate for Long-billed Curlews on the Comanche National Grassland. METHODS Study Area RMBO and its partners used digital GAP vegetation maps to define habitat strata (e.g., Grasslands) for the Monitoring Colorado s Birds program, and placed transects within strata without respect to land ownership. Two Grassland transects fell within the Comanche National Grassland in 1999-2000, and we added and surveyed an additional transect in 2001-2005. RMBO did not survey MCB Grassland transects in 2006. In 2007, RMBO established a new sampling frame within native prairie habitat of BCR 18 in Colorado, using a spatially balanced sampling algorithm to establish new point transects (Beason et al. 2008). One transect fell within Comanche NG in 2007 (Table 1). Conserving Birds and their Habitats 1

RMBO and its partners designed the Shortgrass Prairie (BCR 18) Section Survey program to sample birds within three habitat strata: native prairie, dryland agriculture, and Conservation Reserve Program. We randomly selected 1-mi 2 sections for sampling in proportion to the area of each stratum on the landscape. In 2003-2005, Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands were specifically targeted for monitoring (Tables 1 and 2). Table 1. Numbers of transects surveyed under the Monitoring Colorado s Birds program (MCB) and sections surveyed under the BCR 18 Section Survey program on the Comanche National Grassland. MCB transects consisted of 15 survey points. Section Survey samples usually consisted of 3 survey points. 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total MCB Transects 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 -- 1 20 BCR 18 Sections -- -- 40 75 132 131 130 126 -- 634 Table 2. Numbers sections surveyed under the BCR 18 Section Survey program on the Cimarron National Grassland. Section Survey samples usually consisted of 3 survey points. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total BCR 18 Sections 1 1 21 31 29 30 113 Field Methods Both MCB and Section Survey monitoring used point transect sampling. MCB transects consisted of 15 points located at 250 m intervals along each transect. Additional details of the MCB program can be found in Beason et al. (2008). Section Surveys consisted of 3-4 points randomly located along roads bounding a 1-mi 2 section. If roads occurred on 3-4 sides of a section, one point was selected per side (up to 4 points in 2001 and up to 3 points in subsequent years). If roads occurred on only one or two sides of a section, two or three points would occur along individual roads. Survey points were at least 322 m apart and at least 161 m from section corners. Data were collected within the targeted section, 180 degrees surrounding the observer. Additional details of sectionbased monitoring of breeding birds within the shortgrass prairie can be found in Sparks and Hanni (2006). Each transect was surveyed by one observer collecting data for five minutes per point following protocol established by Leukering et al. (1998) and modified by RMBO in 2006. Technicians conducted all transect surveys in the morning, between ½-hour before sunrise and 11 AM; most surveys were completed before 10 AM. Point transect sampling is based on distance sampling theory, which estimates detection probability as a function of the distances between the observer and the Conserving Birds and their Habitats 2

birds detected (Buckland et al. 1993). The detection probability is used to adjust the count of birds to account for birds that were present but undetected. Details of field sampling methods appear in the 2007 MCB annual report (Beason et al. 2008). Following is a brief summary of the sampling protocol. Data Analysis Distance sampling theory was developed to account for the decreasing probability of detecting an object of interest (e.g., a bird) with increasing distance from the observer to the object (Buckland et al. 2001). Application of distance theory requires that three critical assumptions be met: 1) all birds at and near the sampling location (distance = 0) are detected; 2) distances of birds are measured accurately; and 3) birds do not move in response to the observer s presence. These assumptions are reasonably well met following the MCB protocol. Analysis of distance data is accomplished by fitting a detection function to the distribution of recorded distances. The distribution of distances can be a function of characteristics of the object (e.g., for birds, its size and color, movement, volume of song or call, and frequency of call), the surrounding environment (e.g., density of vegetation), and observer ability. Because detectability varies among species, I analyzed the data separately for each species. I used Program Distance 5.0 (Thomas et al. 2006) to estimate the density of each bird species. I fit the following functions to the distribution of distances for each species: Half normal key function with cosine series expansion, Uniform function with cosine series expansion, Hazard rate key function with cosine series expansion, and Hazard rate key function with simple polynomial series expansion (Buckland et al. 2001). I used Akaike s Information Criterion (AIC) corrected for small sample size (AIC c ) and model selection theory to select the most parsimonious detection function for each species (Burnham and Anderson 2002). Sample sizes were insufficient for all MIS species to estimate observed population trends. RESULTS No Lesser Prairie-Chickens were detected on the Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands through either BCR 18 section surveys or MCB grassland surveys. No Long-billed Curlews were detected on the Cimarron National Grassland through BCR 18 section surveys. Sample sizes were insufficient to estimate densities of Long-billed Curlews and Bullock s Orioles on the Comanche National Grassland from the MCB data (Table 3). Sample sizes were also insufficient to estimate densities of Bullock s Orioles on both National Grassland from the section survey data (Tables 4 and 5). Conserving Birds and their Habitats 3

Table 3. Numbers of avian Management Indicator Species detected during MCB surveys on the Comanche National Grassland, 1999-2007. Year Lesser Long-billed Prairie-Chicken Curlew Bullock s Oriole 1999 0 0 7 2000 0 1 1 2001 0 0 0 2002 0 1 2 2003 0 2 7 2004 0 2 0 2005 0 3 0 2007 0 0 0 Total 0 9 17 Table 4. Numbers of avian Management Indicator Species detected during section surveys on the Cimarron National Grassland, 2001-2006. Year Lesser Long-billed Prairie-Chicken Curlew Bullock s Oriole 2001 0 0 0 2002 0 0 0 2003 0 0 1 2004 0 0 13 2005 0 0 0 2006 0 0 8 Total 0 0 22 Table 5. Numbers of avian Management Indicator Species detected during section surveys on the Comanche National Grassland, 2001-2006. Year Lesser Long-billed Prairie-Chicken Curlew Bullock s Oriole 2001 0 86 2 2002 0 14 1 2003 0 19 3 2004 0 23 2 2005 0 17 2 2006 0 20 2 Total 0 179 12 Buckland et al. (2001) recommend 60-80 independent observations to fit a detection curve to Distance data. Note that of the 86 Long-billed Curlews detected on the Comanche National Grassland in 2001, 80 individuals were detected in two flocks within a single section (two independent observations). Consequently, the Comanche National Grassland yielded only 77 independent detections Curlews across all years. After truncating observations at extreme distances, as required in Distance analysis, 58 independent observations remained to estimate a detection function. Conserving Birds and their Habitats 4

Despite the low number of independent detections, I estimated an average annual density of Curlews on the Comanche National Grassland = 3.85 birds/km 2 (CV = 79%, 90% Confidence interval = 1.09 to 13.59). DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Monitoring avian Management Indicator Species requires rigorous long-term sampling. The MCB transect and BCR 18 section survey sampling designs have yielded precise density estimates for many breeding landbirds, especially passerines (Beason et al. 2008). None of the three CCNG avian Management Indicator Species were monitored sufficiently in 1999-2007 to estimate population trends through RMBO s monitoring programs. Lesser Prairie-Chickens would require a different sampling design than those described in this report. Grouse species are usually monitored when they are most conspicuous during the lekking period. Bullock s Orioles are generally well-sampled using point transect methods. The low numbers of Bullock s Orioles detected may simply reflect a paucity of this species on the Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands. Stanley and Skagen (2007) conducted nation-wide surveys for breeding Longbilled Curlews in 2004-2005, and did not detect Curlews in Colorado in either year (n = 18, 20-32 km survey transects). Stanley and Skagen (2007) estimated that more than 1500 survey transects would be required to detect a 20% decline in the Long-billed Curlew population in the western United States over a 20 year period (with alpha = 0.05, power = 0.80). In addition to the challenges of monitoring an uncommon species, Long-billed Curlews breed in April and May and may be less visible during surveys targeted for later-breeding grassland species. Conserving Birds and their Habitats 5

LITERATURE CITED Buckland, S. T., D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers, and L. Thomas. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford University Press, London, UK. Beason, J., R. Sparks, J. Blakesley, C. White, A. Panjabi, and D. Hanni. 2008. Monitoring Colorado s Birds: 2007 Field Season Report. Tech. Rep. M- MCB07-01. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, 307 pp. Hanni, D., C. McConnell, and T. Leukering. 2003. Section-based monitorig of grassland birds on National Grasslands. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, 53 pp. Leukering, T., M. Carter, A. Panjabi, D. Faulkner, and R. Levad. 1998. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory Point Transect Protocol: Revised 2006. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, 44 pp. Sparks, R.A., and D. J. Hanni. 2006. Section-based Monitoring of Breeding Birds within the Shortgrass Prairie Bird Conservation Region (BCR 18). Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, 160 pp. Stanley, T.R., and S.K. Skagen. 2007. Estimating the breeding population of Long-billed Curlew in the United States. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 2556-2564. Thomas, L., Laake, J.L., Strindberg, S., Marques, F.F.C., Buckland, S.T., Borchers, D.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Hedley, S.L., Pollard, J.H., Bishop, J.R.B. and Marques, T.A. 2006. Distance 5.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/ Conserving Birds and their Habitats 6