Effect of corn silage kernel processing score on dairy cow starch digestibility



Similar documents
Forage Crises? Extending Forages and Use of Non-forage Fiber Sources. Introduction

MEASURING PHYSICALLY EFFECTIVE FIBER ON-FARM TO PREDICT COW RESPONSE

Effective Fiber for Dairy Cows

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

ROLLED VERSUS WHOLE CORN: EFFECTS ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION OF FEEDLOT STEERS

PHYSICALLY EFFECTIVE FIBER FOR DAIRY COWS: CURRENT PERSPECTIVES. R. J. Grant and K. W. Cotanch W. H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

Feed Management Plan Template ( ) Address: Address: Town, State, Zip: Homer City. Farm Name: Phone: Fax:

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

Corn Silage Evaluation: MILK2000 Challenges and Opportunities with MILK2006. Randy Shaver

Understanding CNCPS and CPM: Biology, Modeling, and Best Cost Applications for Balancing the Nutrient Requirements in Dairy Diets

Uses and Abuses of NIR for Feed Analysis

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

Opportunities Inputting Lab Values in Ration Software

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Leveraging Full Value From Your Feeding Software. GPS Dairy Leaders Forum November 20, 2014 Erin Mosley, PhD

Land O Lakes Feed DDGS. Nutrients Concentrate: United States Ethanol Outlook. A Growing Opportunity

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

Energy in the New Dairy NRC. Maurice L. Eastridge 1 Department of Animal Sciences The Ohio State University

Accelerated Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

Summary. Keywords: methanol, glycerin, intake, beef cattle. Introduction

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Strategies for Diet Formulation with High Corn Prices

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

Near-infrared spectroscopy on plot harvesters UVDLUFA V. Peter Tillmann, VDLUFA Kassel Christian Paul, FAL Braunschweig.

EXTENSION CIRCULAR 422 FROM FEED TO MILK: UNDERSTANDING RUMEN FUNCTION

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Response of Dairy Cows to Supplements of Energy and Protein in Early and Mid Lactation

Animal Science Research Centre - Beef Unit Trial Results 2005 (a) Evaluation of head-cut whole crop wheat and barley for beef cattle

LELY VOYAGER. Automatic grazing system. Frontal grazing: the innovative way. innovators in agriculture.

What is the Cattle Data Base

Forage Sorghum Production Guide

Dietary Fat Supplements and Body Condition: Does Fatty Acid Profile Matter? James K. Drackley, Professor of Animal Sciences

Drive-Over Silage Pile Construction John M. Roach and David W. Kammel

Corn Silage Gary Bates, Associate Professor, Plant and Soil Science

Characterization of Pasture- Based Dairy Farms in Florida and Georgia

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

Summary report. A review of 11 applied dairy nutrition models used in Australia

Heat of combustion (gross energy)

Brent Czech New Heights Dairy LLC

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Implement Compact TMR to increase productivity, feed efficiency and health in dairy herds

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Monitoring of the dairy cow for optimizing health and production - energy and protein status

The role of new on-farm technologies in sustainable farm management and dairy herd improvement (DHI)

State of the Art Free Stall Designs: Do They Allow Lame Cows to Maintain Normal Patterns of Stall Use?

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FEEDING WHOLE SHELLED CORN

2014 Virginia State Feed Association & Nutritional Management "Cow" College 2/20/2014. Patton Nittany Dairy Nutrition, Inc.

The effects of partial replacement of corn silage on biochemical blood parameters in lactating primiparous dairy cows

A COMPARISON OF BYGHOLM FEED SIEVE TO STANDARD PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Harvesting, Drying, and Storing Malting Barley

Eco Gest YS, Whole Plant Yucca schidigera, benefits in cattle

Effect of Flaxseed Inclusion on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestion and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Growing and Finishing Diets for Beef Cattle

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

LIVESTOCK GROSS MARGIN FOR DAIRY CATTLE INSURANCE POLICY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

CAPRICORN: A Windows Program for Formulating and Evaluating Rations for Goats

Managing Clostridial Diseases in Cattle

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Grain Stocks Estimates: Can Anything Explain the Market Surprises of Recent Years? Scott H. Irwin

Effects of Diet Particle Size on Pig Growth Performance, Diet Flow Ability, and Mixing Characteristics

Comparison of Software Applications for Formulating Dairy Rations

BURNETT CENTER INTERNET PROGRESS REPORT. No. 12 April, Summary of the 2000 Texas Tech University Consulting Nutritionist Survey

New York dairy manure management greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation costs ( ) Jenifer L. Wightman and Peter B.

Managing the Dairy Farm: Key Performance Indicators

Feeding Value of Sprouted Grains

A diet fit for a pig: seven basic rules

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

NITRATES IN LIVESTOCK FEED

Water Footprint Calculations for Pasture Based Beef Production

Beef Cattle Handbook

Key Performance Indicators to Diagnose Poor Farm Performance and Profitability of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Asia

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

Third International Scientific Symposium "Agrosym Jahorina 2012"

Report on the AgriProFocus Zambia Dairy Learning Lab conducted by PUM Netherlands Senior Experts.

Ruminant Preference for Bermudagrass Hay With and Without Exposure to Swine Lagoon Effluent

EFFECT OF TUNNEL VENTILATION AND EVAPORATIVE COOLING ON THE BARN ENVIRONMENT AND COW COMFORT IN MIDWEST DAIRY FACILITIES

Advanced Technology Use in

BOP Focus Farm Richard & Creina James Farm Walk Notes

Optimal livestock diet formulation with farm environmental compliance consequences. Joleen Hadrich, Christopher Wolf. and.

Key performance measures of farm profitability

Ruminant Digestive System

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

The Effect of Starch Sources with Different Degradability Rates on Milk Production and Composition in Lactating Cows

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION STUDY

DIGESTION is the physical and

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Transcription:

Effect of corn silage kernel processing score on dairy cow starch digestibility William L. Braman, PhD, PAS John E. Kurtz Chr. Hansen, Inc. Milwaukee, Wisconsin (USA)

Introduction In the USA, dairy producers and nutritionists have put more focus on feed efficiency of milk production Low on-farm starch digestibility contributes to reduced feed efficiency. Ferraretto and Shaver (2012) and Ferguson (2003) demonstrated fecal starch is highly negatively correlated to total tract starch digestibility in dairy cows. One factor affecting the digestibility of starch in high producing lactating dairy cows is the extent of the processing of the corn kernel during the harvesting of corn silage. Kernel processors are employed on the forage harvesters to break the corn kernel into smaller fractions. Management of the kernel processing equipment, kernel maturity, and hardness of the corn (flint vs. vitreous) affects extent kernel processing.

Kernel Processing Corn Silage Kernel Processing correlates to availability of starch to rumen and intestinal digestion. Fecal starch is used to measure total tract starch digestion in dairy cows. Research (Ferguson, 2003) demonstrated that each 1% decrease in fecal starch results in 0.33 kg more milk. At milk price of $0.35/kg, 4% decrease in fecal starch equivalent to $0.46/more revenue per cow/day. 1,000 cows =$460 per day more revenue That s Real Money!

Kernel Processing Score A kernel processing score (KPS) was developed by Mertens (2005) Involves submitting a corn silage sample to a laboratory where it is dried and sifted through variable sized mesh sieves. A starch analysis is performed and the portion of the starch that passes through a 4.75 millimetre sieve is determined more digestible by the lactating dairy cow. Kernel Processing Percent of starch less than 4.75 mm Industry Guidelines Greater than 70 50 to 70 Less than 50 Score (KPS) Optimum Adequate Poor

Differences in Kernel Processing Score (KPS) Date %Moist %DM %KPS %Starch 10/22 62.6 37.4 58.9 30.5 Date %Moist %DM %KPS %Starch 10/28 60.7 39.3 72.4 30.9 High KPS appears to be low starch samples Usually not the case

Differences in Fecal Starch 12.5% STARCH IN FECES This pen 79.5% TTSD 0.32% STARCH IN FECES This pen 99.6% TTSD At 25 kg dry matter intake, 28% TMR starch = energy to produce 4.3 kg 3.5% FCM milk= $1.50 more revenue/cow/day 6 July 3, 2015

Objective This trial determined the effect of extent of kernel processing of corn silage on fecal starch and total tract starch digestibility (TTSD) on large commercial dairy farms.

Materials and Methods Data from December, 2012 to July, 2013 35 dairy operations ranging in size from approximately 1,200 to 6,800 cows Represented approximately 58,000 cows located in the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, and S. Dakota A minimum of at least 6 core samples from the face of corn silage bunkers or driveover piles was consolidated A sub-sample sent to a commercial lab (Rock River Laboratories, Watertown, Wisconsin) for KPS determination using the method of Mertens (2005). On the same farms and same day, fresh floor fecal samples were collected from at least 20 cows per pen from pens with cows less than 120 days-in-milk Composite fecal sample analysed for FS by Rock River Laboratories (Watertown, WI) Measured the content of starch in the feces of cows fed the corresponding corn silage Some dairies were sampled more than once as they changed sources of corn silage

Marking bunker face to indicate location of borings Tennis balls indicate boring locations Co-Author Drilling core sample

Results- Fecal starch % plotted against respective silage kernel processing score (%) for each dairy sample (n=47)

Regression Analysis Prediction equation: y = 12.90487 (± 1.04) - 0.15065x (±0.019) y=fecal starch, % x= kernel processing score, %

Results and Discussion A negative relationship between KPS % and FS % was observed R 2 =0.58, P<0.001 Ferraretto and Shaver (2012) demonstrated a negative relationship between FS and total tract starch digestibility (R 2 = 0.94). Because of poor kernel processing, this excess of starch in manure decreases feed efficiency of milk production, adds to the manure load on a dairy farm, and represents wasted money on feed that is not digested

Conclusions Wide variation in KPS (34-76%) on the Midwest USA farms that participated in this research. High negative correlation between corn KPS and FS in high producing lactating dairy cows. Only 4 out of 47 (9%) FS % were below 1.5% suggesting a need to focus on improving kernel processing greater than current standard of 70% KPS. Optimum KPS % should be minimum 80% to achieve 1.0% FS and optimizing total tract starch digestibility in dairy cows

Conclusions Applying the regression suggests that 86% KPS is maximum to intersect at 0% FS Improving corn kernel processing during corn forage harvest is a management tool that can increase: Total tract starch digestibility Milk production efficiency Increase sustainability of dairy production 80% KPS should be considered optimum standard

uswbr@chr-hansen.com

. Effect of corn silage kernel processing score on dairy cow starch digestibility William L. Braman and John E. Kurtz Chr.. Hansen, Inc., Milwaukee, WI, USA Introduction Materials and Methods (cont.) Results and Discussion With the increased cost of grain and forages in the USA, dairy producers have turned their attention to the feed efficiency of milk production. Low on-farm starch digestibility contributes to reduced feed efficiency. Several researchers have demonstrated that measuring fecal starch (FS) is highly correlated to total tract starch digestibility in dairy cows. One factor affecting the digestibility of starch in lactating dairy cows is the extent of the processing of the corn kernel during the harvesting of corn silage. Kernel processors are employed on the forage harvesters to break the corn kernel into smaller fractions. The extent of kernel processing varies based upon the management of the kernel processing equipment, kernel maturity, hardness of the corn, and extent of corn silage fermentation. A kernel processing score (KPS) was developed by Mertens (2005) which involves submitting a corn silage sample to a laboratory where it is dried and sifted through variable sized mesh sieves. A starch analysis is performed and the portion of the starch that passes through a 4.75 millimetre sieve is determined more digestible by the lactating dairy cow. Guidelines for KPS are >70%, excellent; 50 to 70 adequate; and <50% poor. Objective This trial determined the effect of extent of kernel processing of corn silage on fecal starch and total tract starch digestibility (TTSD) on large commercial dairy farms. Composite sample analysed for FS by Rock River Laboratories (Watertown, WI) Measured the content of starch in the feces of cows fed the corresponding corn silage Some dairies were sampled more than once as they changed sources of corn silage Results and Discussion Figure 1. Linear plot of fecal starch % against KPS (%) P = 0.001 R 2 = 0.58 A negative relationship between % KPS and FS % (Figure 1) was observed. Figure 2 plots the KPS score compared to the respective FS % (DM basis) of each dairy arranged from high to low KPS. Linear lines were plotted for both KPS and fecal starch %. Ferraretto and Shaver (2012) and Ferguson (2003) both demonstrated a negative relationship between FS and total tract starch digestibility (R 2 = 0.94). Ferguson (2003) estimated that for each one percentage unit increase in FS above 5% (DM basis), a corresponding decrease of 0.35 kg of milk yield per cow per day can be expected. This excess of starch in manure decreases feed efficiency of milk production, adds to the manure load on a dairy farm, and represents wasted money on feed that is not digested Conclusions A wide variation in kernel processing scores (34-76%) on the Midwest USA farms that participated in this research. Only 4 out of 47 (9%) fecal starch % was below 1.5% suggesting a need to focus on improving kernel processing greater than 70% KPS. High negative correlation between corn kernel processing score and fecal starch in high producing lactating dairy cows. Improving corn kernel processing during corn forage harvest is a management tool that can increase total tract starch digestibility and increase milk production efficiency. Figure 2. Percent fecal starch plotted against respective corn silage kernel processing score (%) for each dairy sample (n=47). Materials and Methods Data from December, 2012 to July, 2013 35 dairy operations ranging in size from approximately 1,200 to 6,800 cows Represented approximately 58,000 cows located in the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, and S. Dakota A minimum of at least 6 core samples from the face of corn silage bunkers or drive-over piles was consolidated A sub-sample sent to a commercial lab (Rock River Laboratories, Watertown, Wisconsin) for KPS determination using the method of Mertens (2005). On the same farms and same day, fresh floor fecal samples were collected from at least 20 cows per pen from pens with cows less than 120 days-in-milk