ARTIGO ORIGINAL B IOR E P ORTAP, AN ELECTRONIC CLINICAL RECORD COUPLED WITH A DATABASE: AN EXAMPLE OF ITS USE IN A SINGLE CENTRE Campanilho-Marques R *, Polido-Pereira J **, Rodrigues A **, Ramos F *, Saavedra MJ *, Costa M *, Martins F ***, Pereira da Silva JA *, Canhão H **, Fonseca JE ** Abstract Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in the Rheumatology Department of Hospital de Santa Maria using the BioRePortAP. Methods: The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR) developed an electronic medical chart coupled with a database for the follow up of PsA patients, the BioRePortAP, which was launched in May 9. This evaluation was based on all the PsA patients that were on active treatment with TNF antagonists in September 9 and were registered in the BioRePortAP. All the previous data on these patients were introduced in BioRePortAP using the prospective paper based follow up protocol that this Department was using since 999. Only patients with more than 9 months of treatment were analyzed. Results: Forty-two patients with PsA, actively treated with anti-tnf agents in September 9, for at least 9 months, were analyzed in BioRePortAP. Twenty-three patients were male (55%) and nineteen were female (5%). The average age of these patients was 9.8±.9 years old, the average disease duration was of.7±5. years and the mean duration of biological therapy was of 37.8±7.8 months. For the 8% of patients with peripheral joint disease there was a mean reduction of more than 8% in the swollen and tender joint counts, and almost 5% in the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) value. In the 9% of the patients with *Serviço de Reumatologia e Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Hospital de Santa Maria **Unidade de Investigação em Reumatologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa e Serviço de Reumatologia e Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Hospital de Santa Maria ***Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia Both author contributed equally to this work axial involvement the reduction of BASDAI and BASFI was not statistically significative. On top of that, PASI score suffered a reduction of %. Fourteen patients (33.3%) had to switch their TNF antagonist treatment. 58.8% of the switches were due to adverse effects and.% due to therapy failure. Regarding the 5 adverse reactions registered, only one was a severe reaction. The remaining adverse reactions were not severe and 7% of them were due to infections. Discussion: The results of this first report of the use of the BioRePortAP in clinical practice confirm the efficacy and safety of TNF antagonist treatment in PsA. The results shown here elucidate the potential applications of BioRePortAP as a tool for efficacy and safety assessment of PsA patients treated with biotechnological drugs. Keywords: Psoriatic Arthritis; Registry; BioReportAP; Biological Therapy; Portugal. Introduction Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been defined as an inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis and seronegative for rheumatoid factor. PsA affects men and women almost equally. The average age at onset in most studies is 3- years. The classic description of PsA includes five clinical patterns. These patterns include distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint involvement, oligoarticular pattern (<5 joints involved) which is usually asymmetric in distribution, a polyarticular pattern (>5 joints involved), which is symmetric in only half the patients, arthritis mutilans, which is a very destructive form of arthritis and spondyloarthritis, affecting the sacroiliac joints and the apophyseal joints of the spine, with a clinical pattern often similar to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Over the past few years, there has been a rene- 7
CAMPANILHO-MARQUES R E COL. wed interest in the treatment of PsA. This has resulted from the advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy that had proven to be highly effective in both psoriasis and PsA 3. TNF is a leading cytokine for the inflammatory aspects noted in the skin and joints and it is a key upstream factor in the activation of other chemokines and cytokines, which may lead to cartilage and bone destruction and to skin scarring. Thus, it is not surprising that tackling TNF leads to marked improvement in joint and skin symptoms and prevents joint destruction and permanent skin lesions. At this moment, only 3 anti TNF treatments are reimbursed in Portugal for the treatment of adult patients with active PsA who have responded inadequately to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs): adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab. Etanercept, a recombinant human soluble TNF receptor is a dimeric fusion protein consisting of the extracellular portion of the human p75 TNF receptor linked to the Fc portion of a Type human immunoglobulin (IgG). The primary action of etanercept is to bind and inactivate soluble and cell-bound TNF and lymphotoxin alpha. In adults, it is administered 5 mg twice a week or 5 mg once a week. Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to human TNF and is composed of human constant and murine variable regions. Infliximab is administered as an intravenous infusion, at a dose of 5 mg/kg, at,, and weeks followed by infusions every 8 weeks. Adalimumab is a fully human anti-tnf IgG antibody, with a mechanism of action similar to infliximab. It is administered as a subcutaneous injection at a dose of mg every two weeks. In order to measure disease activity, progression and change with therapy in PsA patients, it is important to use accurate, reliable and feasible outcome measures that can ideally be employed in longitudinal cohorts, clinical trials and clinical practice,5. Until recently, there has been a low investment on the development of this kind of methodology applied to PsA. With emerging therapies, the focus on the methodology of outcome assessment has increased to ensure that discriminative instruments are used. Most tools applied to the quantification of PsA outcomes have been borrowed from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) outcome studies, but some have been specifically tested in PsA 3. However, the relative variability of PsA clinical manifestations still poses a great challenge in the assessment of real life cohorts, which were not selected through complex inclusion and exclusion criteria, as is the case of clinical trials. A key assessment in rheumatology clinical trials is the counting of the number of tender and swollen joints in a patient. Variable numbers of joints are counted in various systems, such as the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) joint count of 8 tender and swollen (excluding the hips from assessment of swelling), developed in 99 for the evaluation of RA. This has been frequently adapted to be used for the evaluation of PsA patients with peripheral joint involvement (without axial skeleton involvement) the so called RA like patients. These joint counts are then combined with other core measures of disease activity (also adapted to the use in PsA), such as patient and physician assessed global health, through the use of a mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pain (also using a VAS) and inflammation markers (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, ESR, and C reactive protein, CRP) 7. Another classical RA activity measurement, the DAS 8 (disease activity score, based on 8 swollen and tender joints, ESR and patient global health VAS) has been also frequently used in PsA 8. The ASessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) working group has recommended the use of a number of outcome measures for spinal involvement in AS, which includes the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 9, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Function Index (BAS- FI) and a set of mobility measures. This measurements have been used to evaluate PsA in patients that have axial skeleton involvement AS like patients. PsA joint disease activity is commonly not mirrored by skin disease. It thus seems logical to assess skin disease separately. The most widely used system is the Psoriatic Area Severity Index (PASI), and this has been introduced in the description of PsA clinical cohorts. Physical function refers to the abilities or difficulties in daily activities such as walking, opening jars, playing sports, lifting heavy objects, writing and so forth. Assessing physical function by self- -reported questionnaire has become a favored approach because no special equipment or testing personnel is required. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) 3 is a validated questionnaire for measuring physical function in RA. Because 77
BIOREPORTAP, AN ELECTRONIC CLINICAL RECORD COUPLED WITH A DATABASE: AN EXAMPLE OF ITS USE IN A SINGLE CENTRE PsA may affect people in a way similar to RA it has been considered reasonable to use such measure in PsA. An important aspect of the evaluation of the results of DMARDs treatment is the repercussion on structural joint damage. Radiologic signs of joint damage remain the standard method in RA clinical trials, despite the advent of newer modalities such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In PsA the distribution of joint disease is not predictable and it remains to be determined which joints should be scored to get a sufficiently valid measurement of joint damage. Simple measures of inflammation, such as the acute phase reactants, which include ESR and CRP are used, but are not reliably elevated in patients with PsA, even with active inflammation. Desirable but not essential symptom domains to measure include enthesitis, dactylitis, nails and fatigue -. As has already been done for RA and AS, the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR) has developed an informatics platform which combines features of electronic clinical chart with a database for PsA patients who are being treated with biotechnological drugs BioRePortAP. This article is the first application of the use of BioRePortAP to a cohort of PsA patients being followed in a Portuguese Rheumatology Department. In addition, this is also the first report of a Portuguese cohort of PsA patients treated with TNF antagonists. In fact, SPR has promoted national reports on the use of biotechnological drugs in RA 7 and AS 8 but there is no report on patients with PsA. Moreover, despite the existence of national guidelines for treatment of RA 9 and AS patients with biotechnological DMARDs, SPR has not developed this instrument for PsA, which means that the results of this paper can be taken into account in the future elaboration of such guidelines. BioRePortAP will be an important tool for monitoring the efficacy and safety of the use of TNF antagonists in PsA at a national level and this first practical application will help to detail the mechanisms for recording and analysis of data. Material and methods BioRePortAP is an electronic clinical chart that is linked to a database, built on the Plataform.NET (VB.NET) and the SQL DatabaseServer. The NET Plataform (Microsoft) allows the development of software applications for Windows, based on VB.NET programming language to build all the screens used. The information entered is stored in the SQL server database management system (Microsoft). BioRePortAP was launched on May 9 at a national level by SPR and all PsA patients treated with biologic therapies in the Rheumatology Department of Santa Maria s Hospital are being collected prospectively from that date. In addition, this department had also previously started (since 999) a prospective evaluation of all rheumatic patients treated with biotechnological drugs structured on a paper based protocol. This protocol has been adapted from an initial version prepared for RA patients published initially in and updated recently. This evaluation was based on all PsA patients that were on active treatment with TNF antagonists in September 9 for more than 9 moths and were registered in the BioRePortAP. The criteria for starting TNF antagonists was based on the clinical opinion of the assisting physician reflecting, however, the Portuguese recommendations for starting biotechnological drugs in RA 9 and AS patients were also taken into account. The key variables included in the BioRePortAP were: sex, age, birthplace, education, current employment status, prior disease, personal history, general clinical data (type of arthritis, the onset of symptoms and date of diagnosis, radiological signs, HLA B7 typing, body mass index, smoking and alcohol consumption), surgeries, prior therapy (DMARD) and current therapy (name of the drug, starting date, dose, consumption of NSAIDs and corticosteroids) and adverse effects. Severe adverse reactions were defined as the occurrence of death, hospitalization or any event that causes permanent damages. The tuberculin skin test (TST), chest x-ray results, tuberculosis risk factors and latent tuberculosis treatment is also recorded. The complete joint count is registered, as well as patient and physician s global health VAS, patient s pain VAS, HAQ and inflammation markers (ESR and CRP). A computer assisted automatic DAS 8 calculation is available (including CRP or ESR and 3 or variables) 7,8. For patients with axial involvement BASDAI, BASFI and mobility measurements as defined by the ASAS group are used. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is the score used for skin involvement. 78
CAMPANILHO-MARQUES R E COL. Results Forty-two patients with PsA, who in September 9 were under treatment with anti-tnf agents, for at least 9 months, were registered in BioRePortAP and analyzed. Twenty-three patients were male (55%) and nineteen were female (5%). The average age of these patients was 9.8±.9 years old. The youngest was 38 and the eldest was years old. The average age at diagnosis was 38.±. years old and the average disease duration at the current evaluation was of.7±5. years. The shortest disease duration was of 5 years and the longest disease duration was of years. The mean disease duration at the beginning of the biological treatment was of 7.9±.5 years and the mean duration of biological therapy currently under way was of 37.8±7.8 months (minimum of months and maximum of 5 years). For a total of patients 9% had axial skeleton involvement and 8% peripheral joint involvement. HLA-B7 was registered in patients and was positive in (.7%) of them. Due to the high risk of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory joint diseases treated with anti- TNF drugs, the tuberculin skin test (TST) with two units of RT3 and chest x-ray were performed before starting therapy. For further evaluation patients (33.3%) were referred to specialized tuberculosis centers (Centros de Diagnóstico Pneumológico, CDP) and eleven patients (.%) received latent tuberculosis treatment. Tuberculin skin test was performed in all patients prior to starting anti TNF treatment but in two of them there was no registry of the result. Six of the 7 patients with TST<5mm repeated the test and in all of them the result was less then 5mm. In none of them was prescribed prophylactic therapeutic but of the patients with initial TST<5mm and normal chest X-ray were submitted to isoniazid treatment due to the presence of epidemiological risk factors for tuberculosis (in isoniazid 3mg/day during months was prescribed and in the other it was taken during 9 months). In 5 of the 8 patients with TST 5-mm isoniazid (3mg/day during months in patients and during 9 months in ) was prescribed due to the presence of prior immunosuppressive treatment. All the 5 patients with TST>mm received latent tuberculosis treatment: 3 were treated with isoniazid 3mg/day during 9 months, received isoniazid 3mg/day during months and isoniazid and rifampicin during 3 months. At the time of the current evaluation, in a total of patients, 8 were under treatment with etanercept (.9%), with infliximab (38.%) and 8 with adalimumab (9%). Only.% were on monotherapy with anti-tnf drugs and the majority (73.8%) was being treated with an associated conventional DMARD. In 8 patients treated with etanercept, only 5 (7.8%) were on monotherapy and most (55.5%) were being treated concomitantly with methotrexate (MTX). For the patients being treated with infliximab only 37.5% were on monotherapy and 57.3% have associated MTX or other DMARDs. All of the adalimumab treated patients were receiving concomitant MTX (Table I). Fourteen patients (33.3%) had to switch their TNF antagonist treatment and 3 of them made two switches, so in total there were 7 switches. 58.8% of the switches were due to adverse effects and.% due to therapy failure (Table II). To evaluate the 8% of patients with predominant peripheral joint involvement the 8 joint counts and the DAS8 score were applied. The average initial (at the beginning of biologic therapy) number of tender joints (8 joint count) was.3±. and the final (at the moment of evaluation) was 3±5. (p=.5). The swollen joint (8 joint count) count at the beginning of treatment was 9.±9.7 and at the final evaluation was.±. (p=.59) (Figure ). The initial DAS8 was 3.±. and the final was 3±. (p=.) (Figure ). Table I. Biological therapy and DMARDs Monotherapy MTX SLZ MTX/PDN MTX/PDN/SLZ PDN TOTAL Infliximab 37.5.5.5 3.5.5 Etanercept 7.8. 5... Adalimumab.5 5.5 Number of DMARDs (percentages) currently in use in association with biological therapy (anti-tnf) on Psoriatic Arthritis patients MTX: Methotrexate; SLZ: Sulphasalazine; PDN: Prednisone 79
BIOREPORTAP, AN ELECTRONIC CLINICAL RECORD COUPLED WITH A DATABASE: AN EXAMPLE OF ITS USE IN A SINGLE CENTRE Table II. Switch between biological therapies Current Number Reason for Switch Previous therapy therapy of patients Adverse effects Therapeutic failure Etanercept (8) Infliximab Pancreatitis Injection site reaction 3 Adalimumab Injection site reaction Infliximab (7) Etanercept 3 Injections site reaction Upper respiratory infection Adalimumab Injection site reaction Transaminitis Adalimumab () Infliximab Etanercept Number and reason for switches (in absolute numbers) For the 9% of PsA patients with spinal involvement AS like patients BASDAI and BASFI were used. The average initial BASDAI was.3±.9 and the final was 3.±.9 (p=,3). The average initial BASFI was.7±. and the final was.3±.9 (p=.38) (Figure 3 and ). Concerning the acute phase reactants, the initial ESR was 5.9±.9 mm/ st hour and the final was 9.±.5 mm/ st hour (p=.8). The initial CRP was.±3.7 mg/dl and the final.9±.8 mg/ /dl (p=.). To assess skin disease in PsA the PASI was used. The mean initial PASI was.3±3.5 and the final was.±5.5 (p=,5) (Figure 5). In.5% of patients there was a reduction of at least 5% of the PASI value. 8 8 N-8 Tender joints Swollen joints p=,5 p=,7 Figure. Number of tender and swollen joints initial and final (at the moment of the last evaluation) of the 8% of patients with peripheral involvement (mean follow-up 37.8±7.8 months). To assess physical function the self-reported questionnaire HAQ was used. The initial HAQ was.5± and the final was.7±.8 (p=.). At the end of the evaluation period, 8. % of the peripheral joints affected patients had a DAS8 superior to 3.,.5% of the axial involved patients had a BASDAI superior to and % improved less than 5% in their skin condition. The only documented severe adverse reaction was due to a case of pancreatitis, which was considered by the assisting physician to be unlikely related to the use of TNF antagonists. In 3.8% of the mild adverse reactions, the drug had to be discontinued definitely and switched to another TNF antagonist, while in the remaining patients a temporary drug withhold proved to be enough. No tuberculosis case was registered. According to the exposure time,.3 serious adverse reactions occurred by patient-year (Figure ). 7 5 3 p=, Figure. Value of DAS 8 (Disease Activity Score) initial and final (at the moment of the last evaluation) of the 8% of patients with peripheral involvement (mean follow-up 37.8±7.8 months). 8
CAMPANILHO-MARQUES R E COL. p=,3 8 7 5 3 Figure 3. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index initial and final (at the moment of the last evaluation) of the 9% of patients with axial involvement (mean follow-up 37.8±7.8 months). p=,5 7 5 3 Figure 5. Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) initial and final (at the moment of the last evaluation) in all the patients (mean follow-up - 37.8±7.8 months). p=,38 7 5, 5, 5, 35, 3 3, 5,, 5,, Figure. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index initial and final (at the moment of the last evaluation) of the 9% of patients with axial involvement (mean follow-up 37.8±7.8 months). 5,, Infliximab Etanercept Adalimumab Total Infectious Others Total Discussion The results of this first report of the use of the Bio- RePortAP in clinical practice confirm the efficacy and safety of TNF antagonist treatment in PsA. In fact, in a cohort of patients, with a mean treatment duration of 37.8±7.8 months (minimum exposure to the drug of 9 months) in the patients with peripheral joint disease there was a mean reduction of more than 8% in the swollen and tender joint counts and in those with an axial involvement there was a mean reduction in the BASDAI score of 3%. On top of that, the mean PASI score suffered a reduction of %. On the other hand, in this group of patients there was a low rate of serious adverse effects, although a relatively high number of mild adverse effects were reported. The impact on functional scores, such as BASFI Figure. Number of adverse reactions per patient- -years. (mean reduction of.5) and HAQ (mean reduction of.9), reflects the relatively long disease duration that these patients had at the time of starting these drugs. However, this disease duration (slightly less than 8 years) is lower than the one that was verified in the previous RA (almost years) and AS (almost years) Portuguese cohorts of patients treated with biotechnology drugs 7,8. Fourteen patients (33.3%) had to switch from one TNF antagonist to another one due to lack of efficacy in.% of the cases. Three of these patients had to switch again to a third anti TNF drug also due to lack of efficacy. The remaining causes for switching were adverse effects. Even with additional measures to ensure the effectiveness of treat- 8
BIOREPORTAP, AN ELECTRONIC CLINICAL RECORD COUPLED WITH A DATABASE: AN EXAMPLE OF ITS USE IN A SINGLE CENTRE ment such as switching and associating DMARDs (73.8% of the patients) there were 8. % of the peripheral affected patients with a DAS8 superior to 3.,.5% of the axial involved patients with a BASDAI superior to and % improved less than 5% in their skin condition. Moreover, the improvements observed in mean DAS8 and mean BAS- DAI scores were not statistically significative. These observations suggest that some of these patients should be reassessed for treatment optimization (classical DMARD readjustment, switch to another TNF antagonist and review of the treatment options for skin disease). The dissociation between the reduction in the 8 joint count and the results of the DAS8 score suggest that DAS8 is a weak discriminating assessment toll for PsA. Due to the high incidence of tuberculosis in the general Portuguese population, particularly in inflammatory joints diseases treated with anti-tnf drugs, strict recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection were elaborated by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Since, specific guidelines for screening candidates to anti-tnf therapy for active and latent TB have been followed. The first version of these guidelines was published in September and placed on the General Directorate of Health Internet website in December 3. Before this date, the threshold of TST positivity was higher (TST>mm) and that explains why 3 of the patients, who had TST between 5 and mm and started biological therapy before didn't receive latent tuberculosis infection treatment. In the recent Portuguese recommendations the TST is considered positive if: 5mm in any patient who is about to start anti-tnf treatment and is concomitantly immunossuppressed (prednisolone in doses higher than mg/day and/or with immunosuppressant drugs, such as MTX, cyclosporine, azathioprine, leflunomide or cyclophosphamide, regardless of the dose); or mm in patients who are not taking previous immunossuppressing drugs. Four of the patients had a negative TST but were, also in accordance to these guidelines, submitted to treatment because they were immunossuppressed and had epidemiologic risk factors for tuberculosis. Fourteen of the patients were referred to Centro Diagnóstico Pneumológico (CDP) or to a Pulmonology Department, corresponding to the ones that had started the treatment more recently, following the 8 updated version of these guidelines that recommend that all patients in evaluation for TNF antagonist therapy should be referred to a tuberculosis specialized centre. Regarding safety it is important to highlight that several mild infectious adverse effects were detected. However, severe adverse effects were very rare. The way the Day Care Unit of Rheumatology Department of the Hospital de Santa Maria is organized favors the detection of all the complications because patients are advised to seek medical support in the Day Care Unit whenever a complication occurs. On the other hand, this easy contact combined with a low threshold for the diagnosis of infections might contribute to the low rate of severe adverse effects. The results shown here elucidate the potential applications of BioRePortAP as a tool for efficacy and safety assessment of PsA patients treated with biotechnological drugs. Moreover this informatics tool can also act as a guarantee of good clinical practice and a source of data for self assessment of a Rheumatology department. The characteristics of this first report of the Bio- RePortAP, including only a population that was on therapy at a certain date (September 9), limits the type of conclusions that can be achieved. However, at long term evaluations, BioRePortAP will be able to inform precisely on drug survival, which is the main limitation of the current assessment. Correspondence to Raquel Campanilho-Marques Serviço de Reumatologia e Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Avenida Professor Egas Moniz 9-35 Lisboa Tel: +35 9 53 8 E-mail: raquelpcmarques@gmail.com References. Glandman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. Dermatol Ther 9; : -55.. Taylor WJ. The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol ; : 98-3. 3. Taylor WJ. Assessment of outcome in psoriatic arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol ; : 35-353.. Mease JP. Spondyloarthritits Update: New insights Regarding Classification, Pathophysiology and management. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 8; : 3-9. 5. Mease PJ, Antoni CE, Gladman DD et al. Psoriatic arthritis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 5; : 9-5.. Van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van t Hof MA et al. Development and validation of the European League 8
CAMPANILHO-MARQUES R E COL. Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 99; 39: 3-. 7. Deandrade JR. A seven-day variability study of 99 patients with peripheral rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 95; 8: 3-33. 8. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Elberl G et al. Validity and reability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. Arthritis Rheum 995; 38: 38-3. 9. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 99; : 8 9.. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H et al. New approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 99; : 8 85.. Frederiksson T. Severe psoriasis oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatol 99; 57: 38-.. Gottlieb AB. The National Psoriasis Foundation Psoriasis Score (NPF-PS) system versus the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Physician s Global Assessment (PGA): a comparison. J Drug Dermatol 3; : :. 3. Fries JF, Kraines RG, Splitz Z et al. Measurement of patient outcomes in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 98; 3: 37-5.. Olivieri I, Cantini F, Salvarani C et al. Fast spin echo- T-weighted sequences with fat saturation in dactylitis of spondylarthritis. No evidence of entheseal involvement of the flexor digitorum tendons. Arthritis Rheum ; : 9-97. 5. Schentag CT.Validation and normative data for the - point scale version of the fatigue severity scale (FSS). Ann Rheum Dis ; 3: 77-8.. McGonagle D, Emery P, Gibbon W et al. Classification of inflammatory arthritis by enthesistis. Lancet 998; 35: 37-. 7. Grupo de Estudos de Artrite Reumatóide da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Análise de 37 doentes com artrite reumatóide submetidos a terapêutica biológica registados na base de dados de terapêutica biológica da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Acta Reum Port 5; 3: 3-7. 8. Grupo de Consensos para as terapêuticas biológicas na Espondilite Anquilosante da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Análise de doentes com espondilite anquilosante submetidos a terapêutica biológica registados na base de dados de terapêutica biológica da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Acta Reum Port 5; 3: 53-. 9. João Eurico Fonseca, Helena Canhão, Paulo Reis et al. Portuguese guidelines for the use of biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis March update. Acta Reum Port ; 35: 95-98.. Grupo de Consensos para as Terapêuticas biológicas na Espondilite Anquilosante da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Consensos sobre a utilização de antagonistas do TNF na terapêutica da espondilite anquilosante. Acta Reum Port 5; 3: 55-59.. Fonseca JE, Canhão H, Reis P et al. Protocolo de monitorização clínica da artrite reumatóide (PMAR) revisão de Dezembro de 7. Acta Reum Port 7 3: 37-37.. Fonseca JE, Lucas H, Canhão H et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis in inflammatory joint diseases candidates for therapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors March 8 update. Acta Reum Port 8; 33: 77-85. 3. Fonseca JE, Lucas H, Canhão H et al. Recomendações para o diagnóstico e tratamento da tuberculose latente e activa nas doenças inflamatórias articulares candidatas a tratamento com fármacos inibidores do factor de necrose tumoral alfa. Acta Reum Port ; 3: 37-5. 3nd American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Annual Meeting Toronto, Canadá 5 a 9 de Outubro 83