The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

Similar documents
Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatality Rates by Type and Size of Vehicle

German Insurance Association No. 38. Compact accident research. Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR NAS. December Office Vehicle Safety Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Investigation of bicycle accidents involving collisions with the opening door of parking vehicles and demands for a suitable driver assistance system.

IIHS crashworthiness evaluation programs and the U.S. vehicle fleet

Iowa CODES Fact Sheet 1. Traumatic Brain Injuries Caused by Motor Vehicle Crash (MVC)

Accidents with Pedestrians and Cyclists in Germany Findings and Measures

MOTORBIKE RIDERS AND CYCLISTS

Characteristics of Motorcycle Crashes in the U.S.

RISER. Roadside Infrastructure for Safer European Roads

The Relative Safety of Large and Small Passenger Vehicles

FATALITY FACTS 2004: LARGE TRUCKS

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Accident configurations and injuries for bicyclists based on the German In-Depth Accident Study. Chiara Orsi

Cycling Safety in Europe

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

CYCLIST-CAR ACCIDENTS THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR CYCLISTS AND TYPICAL ACCIDENT SCENARIOS

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

What You Should Know About 15-Passenger Vans

Light-Duty Vehicle Purchase Approval Form

20 Tips for Safe Driving

Vehicle safety: A move towards zero fatalities

Motorcycles: Quantifying risks and countermeasures

Dr. Eric D. Hildebrand and Dr. Frank R. Wilson University of New Brunswick Transportation Group New Brunswick, Canada

Montana Traffic Safety Problem Identification FFY 2011

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

20 Tips for Safe Driving

Car Crash Compatibility: The Prospects for International Harmonization

climate unit for the passenger compartment.

Young teen crash risk by vehicle type

Executive Order Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving

Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age: United States,

Advanced Forward-Looking Safety Systems Working Group. Advanced Forward-Looking Safety Systems Working Group

How Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired Comparison Study of Car-to-Car Crashes

Content. 1 Introduction 8. 2 Why do traffic accidents happen? 10

Vehicle Mismatch: A Critical New Safety Defect Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

The facts about mobile phones and driving

ANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)

Road Safety Authority Provisional Review of Road Crashes 2013

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

Road fatalities in Road fatality: person killed in a traffic crash or deceased because of an injury within 30 days after the crash.

15-Passenger Van Safety Frequently Asked Questions & Recommendations for Safe Operation

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

DOT HS December Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview ,000. Fatality Rate per 100M VMT

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

ITSMR Research Note. Cell Phone Use and Other Driver Distractions: A Status Report KEY FINDINGS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION.

FRONTAL COLLISION BUSES AND COACHES. RESEARCH AND PROBLEMS

Motor Vehicle Collision Form

ITARDAInstitute for Traffic Accident

Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Characteristics of High Injury Severity Crashes on km/h Rural Roads in South Australia

40,46 16,22 16,25. no fx thoracic sp. Fx lumbar spine. no fx lumbar. spine

Table 1. Summary of Crashworthiness Rating Methods and Databases. Essential characteristics

How To Understand The Safety Of A Motorcycle

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Ground Ambulance Crashes. April 2014

Independence Day 2016 Holiday Period Traffic Fatality Estimate

Main figures on Road Safety Data Spain 2013

New York Car Accident Lawyers

Differences between CTP Insurance Statistics and Crash Statistics

SAMPLE VEHICLE FLEET SAFETY & USAGE POLICY

THE ACCIDENT REDUCTION EFFECTIVENESS OF ESC EQUIPPED CARS IN GREAT BRITAIN.

2. Road Traffic Accident Conditions During 2009

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)

MISSOURI TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPENDIUM

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

SPORT CLUB TRAVEL GUIDE

Motor Vehicle Fatalities Accepted by the Workers Compensation Board

How To Study The Effects Of Road Traf C On A Person'S Health

Car occupants intoxication and non-use of safety belts

How To Know If A Motorcyclist Is Safe

Traffic Collision Statistics Report

The New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements

Transcription:

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany Dr. Axel Malczyk German Insurers Accident Research ICROBI Dublin, 12.09.2012

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 2 Literature Canada: Increased risk of serious injury or death for car drivers when opponent was an SUV or pick-up (Fredette et al., 2008) USA: Increased fatality risk for SUV occupants in roll-overs (Subramanian, 2006) USA: 3.4 times higher fatality risk for pedestrians when struck by LTV (incl. SUV) front than by passenger car front (Roudsari et al., 2004) Europe: Higher injury risk for car occupants and motorcyclists in collisions with SUV, higher risk of roll-over for SUVs, divergent results regarding injury risk for pedestrians (EU project IMPROVER, 2006)

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 3 Definition of SUV USA: Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) refers to ANSI D16.1 (American National Standard) Utility Vehicle is multi-purpose vehicle, generally with 4x4 drive and increased ground clearance, with GVWR 10,000 lbs. ( 4,500 kg) USA: CFR 49 Part 523 Light trucks include SUVs, pick-up trucks, minivans and vans Light truck is designed for off-highway operation and has 4x4 drive or fulfills certain geometrical requirements (e.g. min. approach and departure angle, min. ground clearance) CFR 49 Part 523 pertains also to average fuel economy standards and may become more stringent due to re-classification of models

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 4 Definition of SUV, cont d EU project IMPROVER: SUV is a passenger vehicle (M1 class) with approach angle > 25 departure and ramp angle > 20 ground clearance under front and rear axle > 180 mm ground clearance between axles > 200 mm vehicle height > 1600 mm 4x4 drive no necessary requirement identical to U.S. Part 523 Definition for own study: SUV is a passenger vehicle (M1 class) with ground clearance > 170 mm vehicle height > 1590 mm 4x4 drive no necessary requirement

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 5 Study Methodology Based on geometrical SUV criteria, 83 models identified (current and out-of-production), representing large majority of German SUV market Special analysis of German national accident statistics (all policeregistered injury accidents) with involvement of these models 1997 2008 injury accidents, general data 2008 injury accidents for detailed analysis Detailed analysis of 361 injury accidents from insurer claim files (min. 15,000 damage) with involvement of respective SUV models Analysis of two vehicle user surveys including SUV owners

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 6 Study Methodology SUV models differentiated by Size: vehicle track width used as indicator for SUV size small if track width 1550 mm large if track width > 1550 mm track width

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 7 Study Methodology SUV models differentiated by Size: vehicle track width used as indicator for SUV size small if track width 1550 mm large if track width > 1550 mm Age: market introduction as indicator for state-of-the-art passive safety old if model introduced before 2003 new if introduced in 2003 or after

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 8 Study Methodology SUV models differentiated by Size: vehicle track width used as indicator for SUV size small if track width 1550 mm large if track width > 1550 mm Age: market introduction as indicator for state-of-the-art passive safety old if model introduced before 2003 new if introduced in 2003 or after Structure: typical vehicle concept SUV with frame chassis design SUV with unibody design

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 9 Study Methodology SUV models differentiated by Size: vehicle track width used as indicator for SUV size small if track width 1550 mm large if track width > 1550 mm Age: market introduction as indicator for state-of-the-art passive safety old if model introduced before 2003 new if introduced in 2003 or after Structure: typical vehicle concept SUV with frame chassis design SUV with unibody design Eight SUV categories from small / old / frame chassis to large / new / unibody SUV model

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 10 National Statistics: Incidence Rate SUV crash involvement almost parallel to increasing share in fleet

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 11 National Statistics: Incidence Rate Involvement of small, old SUVs with frame chassis decreases

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 12 National Statistics: Incidence Rate Involvement of SUVs with unibody increases

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 13 National Statistics: Incidence Rate Involvement of new, esp. large, SUVs with unibody increases

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 14 SUV versus Passenger Car, Crash Outcome Results from National Statistics Apparently, large and new SUVs present highest risk for car occupants Old and frame chassis SUVs with less protection for SUV occupants

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 15 SUV versus Passenger Car, Injuries Results from Insurers Cases (n = 156 accidents) All SUV-vs.-car collisions All occupants Frontal collisions SUV-vs.-car Belted drivers Higher risk of serious to critical (MAIS 3+) injury for car occupants MAIS 3+ injuries to extremities indicate car compartment intrusion

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 16 SUV versus Passenger Car, Compatibility Results from Insurers Cases (n = 156 accidents) Frontal collisions SUV-vs.-car Frontal collisions SUV-vs.-car Large majority of SUVs heavier than car opponent Difference in vehicle age not so pronounced

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 17 SUV Single-Vehicle Accidents National Statistics 6.4 % single-vehicle crashes among SUV injury accidents 10.7 % single-vehicle crashes among passenger car injury accidents In 2008, 9 SUV occupant fatalities in single-vehicle accidents, 6 in collisions with passenger cars Insurers Cases (n = 17 accidents) Altogether, 4 drivers and 3 front seat passengers killed, 27 occupants seriously injured 3 in 4 SUVs turned or rolled over during crash USA (IIHS Fatality Facts, 2009) 64 % of killed SUV occupants in single-vehicle crashes 46 % of killed car occupants in single-vehicle crashes

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 18 SUV-Pedestrian Accidents SUV-vs.-pedestrian cases compared to car-vs.-pedestrian cases National Statistics No difference in injury outcome for pedestrians struck by SUVs and those struck by passenger cars Minor decrease in proportion of seriously and fatally injured when struck by new SUV vs. old SUV Insurers Cases (n = 52 pedestrians) Proportion of MAIS 3+ injuries slightly higher than in group of pedestrians struck by pass. cars Minor differences in severity for head, chest, legs, pelvis between those struck by SUV and those struck by pass. car (not signif.)

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 19 Vehicle User Surveys Automotive supplier customer panel (incl. 686 SUV owners) 2010 survey Traffic climate in Germany (incl. 306 SUV drivers) Similar gender distribution (male drivers: 56 % in SUV; 51 % pass. car) On average, similar age of SUV (mean: 45 yrs.) and pass. car drivers (mean: 50 yrs.), but smaller share of young and elderly drivers in SUVs SUV drivers reported ca. 30 % higher annual mileage

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 20 Discussion / Conclusions, Driver Behavior SUVs not prominent in injury accidents in Germany Causes of SUV accidents not different from car accidents SUV drivers feel safer in traffic, perform distracting tasks more often during driving (e.g., cell phone use) No indication of directly unsafe behavior of SUV drivers (e.g. speeding) Typical age groups at risk clearly underrepresented Advantages partly compensated by higher exposure (i.e., mileage) However, young SUV drivers prominent in single-vehicle accidents

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 21 Discussion / Conclusions, SUV characteristics If collision with SUV occurs, higher injury risk in opponent car On average, SUVs 4.5 yrs. old, cars are 8.1 yrs. old in German fleet Change in SUV fleet towards larger unibody vehicles reflected in accident involvement Protection for SUV occupants improved, protection of crash opponents still insufficient (trend towards unibody and larger mass) Higher tendency for SUVs to roll over SUV-pedestrian accidents show slightly lower injury risk for head, slightly higher injury risk for leg and pelvis SUV crash compatibility remains an issue; possible countermeasures: larger area of energy-absorbing structure, emergency braking systems.

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 22 Thank you for your attention! Contact: Axel Malczyk a.malczyk@gdv.de Let s see, what great adventures Dad is going to experience today on the way to the office!

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 23 SUV Single-Vehicle Accidents National Statistics 6.4 % single-vehicle crashes among SUV injury accidents 10.7 % single-vehicle crashes among passenger car injury accidents In 2008, 9 SUV occupant fatalities in single-vehicle accidents, 6 in collisions with passenger cars Insurers Cases 17 cases of single-vehicle crashes among SUV accidents Altogether, 4 drivers and 3 front seat passengers killed, 27 occupants seriously injured 3 in 4 SUVs turned or rolled over during crash USA (IIHS Fatality Facts, 2009) 64 % of killed SUV occupants in single-vehicle crashes 46 % of killed car occupants in single-vehicle crashes

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 24 SUV-Pedestrian Accidents SUV-vs.-pedestrian cases compared to car-vs.-pedestrian cases National Statistics No difference in injury outcome for pedestrians struck by SUVs and those struck by passenger cars Minor decrease in proportion of seriously and fatally injured when struck by new SUV vs. old SUV Insurers Cases 52 cases of collisions between SUVs and pedestrians Proportion of MAIS 3+ injuries slightly higher than in group of pedestrians struck by pass. cars Minor differences in injury severity for head, chest, legs, pelvis when struck by SUV or struck by passenger car

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 25 Discussion / Conclusions, Driver Behavior SUVs not prominent in injury accidents in Germany Causes of SUV accidents not different from car accidents SUV drivers tend to feel generally safer in road traffic, operate navigation devices or cell phone more often during driving No indication of directly unsafe behavior of SUV drivers Typical SUV driver does not belong to age groups at risk In single-vehicle accidents, young SUV driver population prominent Low risk driver behavior partly compensated by higher accident exposure

Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. 26 Discussion / Conclusions, SUV characteristics If collision with SUV occurs, higher injury risk in opponent car SUVs in German fleet 4.5 yrs. old, the average German car is 8.1 yrs. Change in SUV fleet towards larger unibody vehicles reflected in accident involvement Protection for SUV occupants improved, protection of crash opponents still insufficient, despite change from frame chassis to unibody, partly due to growth in SUV mass Higher tendency to roll over also visible in Germany Pedestrian accidents show slightly lower risk for serious head injury, slightly higher risk for serious leg and pelvis injury, but not significant Some deficiencies in crash compatibility remain and should be addressed with larger energy-absorbing front areas, but also with emergency braking systems.