December ehealth Vendor Workgroup. December 18, 2014 2:00 PM ET



Similar documents
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) QCDR Reporting Overview. Program Year 2014

Reporting Once for 2014 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs

Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

How to Avoid 2016 Negative Payment Adjustments for CMS Medicare Quality Reporting Programs. September 17, 2014

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Requirements

Modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 Final Rule Summary

Aligning Meaningful Use CQM and PQRS Reporting for 2015

Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0

To: CHIME Members From: CHIME Public Policy Staff Re: Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting with Electronic Clinical Quality Measures

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015

Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Update May 29, Florida Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee

Eligible Hospitals Meaningful Use Stage 1

CMS EHR Incentive Programs:

Troubleshooting Audio

Physician Compare. Virtual Office Hour Session. January 22, 2015

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Quality Measurement and Program Alignment

2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide 12/13/2013

MEDICARE EHR: PREPARING FOR Community Counts Practice Effectiveness Web Series ION June 26, 2014 Risë Marie Cleland Oplinc, Inc.

TABLE 1: STAGE OF MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA BY FIRST PAYMENT YEAR

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Meeting Meaningful Use Stage 2 with InstantPHR TM.

Clinical Quality Measures Physician Quality Reporting System 2014

Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview

Meaningful Use: Registration & Attestation Eligible Professionals

How to Report Once for 2015 Medicare Quality Reporting Programs: Individual Eligible Professionals

2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide

= AUDIO 8/20/2015. e Clinical Quality Reporting for Hospitals and Providers. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ. Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS IM

Re: CMS 3323 NC, Request for Information (RFI): Certification Frequency and Requirements for the Reporting of Quality Measures Under CMS Programs

Registration and Attestation

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update

Preview of the Attestation System for the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide

(EHR) Incentive Program

MEDICARE AND MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM: OVERVIEW

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use (MU): Determining your Stage and Timeline. Shannon Means, MPA Healthcare Performance Professional SCAN Health Plan

The Road to Robust Use of HIT: Navigating Meaningful Use and Beyond. by Jennifer McAnally, tnrec Director

4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates ehealth Services and Support September 24, 2014

Three Proposed Rules on EHRs:

QUALITY BEGINNER. PQRS Training Module: QUALITY MEASUREMENT 101. Last Updated: August 2014

November 22, Dear Ms. Tavenner:

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Elizabeth S. Holland, MPA Director, HIT Initiatives Group Office of E-Health Standards & Services, CMS

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: Certified EHR Technology. National Provider Call CMS and ONC June 27, 2013

Meaningful Use Update

Maryland Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Registration and Attestation System. Provider User Guide. Version 2

Maryland Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Registration and Attestation System. Provider User Guide. Version 3

Meaningful Use Stage 2: What s Next?

Understanding Eligibility & Registration for the Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Eligible Hospitals and CAHs

To: From: Date: Subject: Proposed Rule on Meaningful Use Requirements Stage 2 Measures, Payment Penalties, Hardship Exceptions and Appeals

EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM REGISTRATION: What You Need to Know

Georgia Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentives Program. General Overview. Presented by Jacqueline Koffi, Program Director

Meaningful Use Stage

Administrative Review of Certain Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Determinations

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

(EHR) Incentive Program

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Eligible Professionals

(EHR) Incentive Program

February 24, 2012 (202) CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer

(EHR) Incentive Program

Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) What are CQMs?

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Overview of the Development and Implementation of CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS. Sandra Adams, RN, BSN Lauren Fuentes, MPH.

CMS is requesting information to aid in the planning and implementation of the MIPS in the following areas:

Alaska Department of Health and Social Services Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

The Meaning Behind Meaningful Use Stage 2

To start the pre-approval process, providers must fill out a short online survey, available at:

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

EHR/Meaningful Use

June 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley

Collaborating to Meet the Challenge of PQRS EHR-Based Reporting

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

S.C. Medicaid EHR Incentive Program 2012 SC Health Information Exchange & Health Information Technology Summit

Stage 2 Medical Billing and reconciliation of Patients

Dear Ms. Tavenner: 33 W. Monroe, Suite 1700 Chicago, IL Phone: Fax:

Frequently Asked Questions

Regulations Overview

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Meaningful Use Frequently Asked Questions Webinar

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and Office of the National Coordinator for health Information Technology (ONC), HHS.

WHAT IS MEANINGFUL USE AND HOW WILL IT AFFECT MY PRACTICE? CMS EHR Incentive Programs

Understanding Attestation for the Medicare EHR Incentive Programs Eligible Professionals. National Provider Call May 5, 2011

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Improve the Quality of Care and Earn $12,000 A simple guide to understanding the Medicare EHR Incentive program, from registration through

Lessons Learned From Medicare EHR Registration and Attestation for Eligible Providers (EPs)

CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015

Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: March 2014

The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Medicaid EHR Incentive Frequently Asked Questions

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 3 AND CERTIFICATION PROPOSED RULES

Transcription:

December ehealth Vendor Workgroup December 18, 2014 2:00 PM ET 1

Agenda Agenda Item Speaker Summary of Care Measure #3 December 31 Hospital Deadline EHR-Based Submission Overview Joint Commission Update FMQAI Prod Fix Updates Beth Myers and Vidya Sellappan Vidya Sellappan Dr. Daniel Green Patty Craig Stephanie Wilson/Artrina Sturges 2

Summary of Care Measure #3 FAQ 11666 Question: When reporting on the Summary of Care objective, how can a provider meet measure 3 if they are unable to complete a test with the CMS designated test EHR (Randomizer)? Answer: CMS is aware of difficulties providers are having in use of the CMS Designated Test EHRs (NIST EHR-Randomizer Application) to meet measure 3 of the Summary of Care objective. At this time the two CMS Designated Test EHRs can only exchange/match with an EP that is Direct Trust (DT) Accredited. There is not a non-dt Accredited Test EHR for providers to use to successfully complete the test. The following actions are currently in place to meet the Summary of Care objective for measure 3: 1. Exchange a summary of care with a provider or third party who has different CEHRT as the sending provider as part of the 10% threshold for measure #2. A successful exchange in measure #2 allows the provider to meet the criteria for measure #3 without the need to conduct a test with the Randomizer as outlined in measure #3, or 2. Conduct at least one successful test with the CMS designated test EHR (if the provider is Direct Trust Accredited).

FAQ 11666 Continued If the provider does not exchange summary of care documents with recipients using a different CEHRT in common practice, and cannot use the CMS Designated Test EHR for the reasons outlined above, the provider may retain documentation on their circumstances and attest Yes to meeting measure #3 if they have and are using certified EHR which meets the standards required to send a CCDA ( 170.202). This exchange may be conducted outside of the EHR reporting period timeframe but must take place no earlier than the start of the year and no later than the end of the year or the provider attestation date whichever occurs first. For example, a EP who is reporting Meaningful Use for a 90-day EHR reporting period may conduct this exchange outside of this 90-day period as long as it is completed no earlier than January 1st of the EHR reporting year and no later than December 31st of the EHR reporting year. Review FAQ in CMS FAQ System: https://questions.cms.gov/faq.php?faqid=11666 4

December 31 Hospital Deadline FY 2014 ended for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals on September 30, 2014 Hospitals participating in the Medicare EHR Incentive Program must attest by 11:59 PM ET on December 31, 2014 for FY 2014 The deadline for eligible hospitals and CAHs that are electronically submitting CQMs via Quality Net is also December 31, 2014

EHR-Based Submission ehealth Vendor Workgroup Reporting Overview

Disclaimers This presentation was current at the time it was published or uploaded onto the web. Medicare policy changes frequently so links to the source documents have been provided within the document for your reference. This presentation was prepared as a tool to assist providers and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations. Although every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the information within these pages, the ultimate responsibility for the correct submission of claims and response to any remittance advice lies with the provider of services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) employees, agents, and staff make no representation, warranty, or guarantee that this compilation of Medicare information is error-free and will bear no responsibility or liability for the results or consequences of the use of this guide. This publication is a general summary that explains certain aspects of the Medicare Program, but is not a legal document. The official Medicare Program provisions are contained in the relevant laws, regulations, and rulings. 7

Agenda Data Submission Test Submission Production Submission IACS Account Help Resources 8

Data Submission Data Submission Vendors (DSVs) must be able to collect all needed data elements and transmit the data to CMS on behalf of eligible professionals or group practices participating via the group practice reporting option (GPRO). DSVs must obtain an IACS account in order to have access to the test and production portlets. Eligible professionals (EPs) and group practices participating via GPRO using an EHR Direct Vendor product must be able to collect all needed data elements and transmit the data to CMS on behalf of themselves. EPs and group practices participating via GPRO must obtain an IACS account in order to have access to the test and production portlets. 9

Data Submission DSVs, EPs and group practices participating via GPRO must submit data to CMS in one of the following file formats. Quality Reporting Data Architecture (QRDA) Category I QRDA Category III 10

Test Submission CMS strongly encourages file testing for the QRDA category I file and/or QRDA category III file. Test submissions will help stakeholders understand what components are required and alleviate issues with the file format and submission that may occur when submitting the quality measure data. The Submission Engine Validation Tool (SEVT) is utilized for test submissions only. The SEVT is currently available for testing with the 2014 QRDA Category I & III Implementation Guide. 11

Test Submission SEVT Information The SEVT is available for testing year round. The SEVT will validate individual files up to 10 MB. Zip files can t be submitted to the SEVT. The SEVT validates file format not content. For security reasons, only test data should be submitted to the SEVT. User receives real-time information indicating if an uploaded file was accepted or rejected. If rejected, error information is displayed. User access defines ability to validate a file. A PQRS SEVT User Guide is posted on the landing page of the PQRS portal (http://www.qualitynet.org/pqrs). 12

Production Submission PQRS and EHR Incentive Program DSVs and EPs/group practices submitting via a EHR direct product must submit the quality measure data, in the proper format, to CMS. The QRDA Category I and QRDA Category III submissions will begin on January 1, 2015 and conclude at 8:00 PM ET on February 28, 2015. The PQRS Portal is used for production submission. http://qualitynet.org/pqrs * Submit early and often to ensure data is submitted and questions/issues can be resolved prior to the end of the submission period. 13

Production Submission Data Submission Size Restrictions QRDA Category I & III must be greater than 0 bytes, but not exceed 10 MB. Production files of the same file type may be zipped. Submission User Guides Submission User Guides are available on the PQRS portal (https://www.qualitynet.org/pqrs) in the User Guide section on the lower left pane. PQRS Portal User Guide PQRS SEVT User Guide PQRS Submission User Guide PQRS Submission Report User Guide 14

IACS Accounts Individuals Authorized Access to the CMS Computer Services (IACS) Accounts IACS Account holders are limited to 1 account per person One account may be associated with multiple TINS. One account may be associated with multiple roles. An existing IACS account may not be transferred to another individual; however a new account may be created. IACS Account Users are responsible for submissions. EHR DSV s or EHR Direct provider offices should obtain their IACS accounts as early as possible to prevent delays in test or production submissions. EHR Direct Submission provider offices may have up to 15 IACS PQRS Submitters per TIN. EHR DSV s may acquire an unlimited number of IACS accounts. EHR Direct Submission provider offices & EHR DSV s should have back-up submitter accounts to plan for unplanned absences. 15

IACS Security Official (SO) Role The Security Official (SO) is the authorized representative for the organization, as it applies. (i.e., the EHR DSV organization or the EHR Direct Submission provider office organization) and the SO registers the specific organization in IACS. There may only be one SO for the organization with 2 factor Authentication Approver Role. The SO will need to choose the preferred 2 nd factor notification method, either by selecting email, SMS/mobile, or interactive voice response number. The SO approves the IACS PQRS Submitter role within the organization. The SO cannot submit data in the PQRS Portal. If the organization already has an SO (with 2 factor), make sure the SO account is active. If it is not active, follow the steps in IACS to reactivate. 16

IACS PQRS Submitter Role PQRS Submitter Role is for the organization users accessing the PQRS Portal to submit data. (The EHR DSV organization or the EHR Direct Submission provider office organization as it applies.) PQRS Submitter Role must be approved by the specific organization SO with 2 nd factor authentication. There may be multiple PQRS Submitters for the organization. Once the PQRS Submitter role for the organization is obtained and the submission period begins; the PQRS Submitter will be ready to submit PQRS reporting data extracted from the EHR system. 17

IACS Account resources For assistance with new and existing IACS accounts, review the Quick Reference Guides located at: https://www.qualitynet.org/portal/server.pt/gateway/ptargs _0_207_374_212_229_43/http%3B/pdpqap42- app.sdps.org%3b7087/publishedcontent/publish/pqri_conten t/pqri_guest_community/userrefguide.html 18

Update on Joint Commission ORYX Activities December 18, 2014 Patty Craig, MS MIS Associate Project Director Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation The Joint Commission Copyright, The Joint Commission

2014 ORYX epilot 12 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2014 epilot The epilot is now closed The Joint Commission successfully received and stored ecqm data associated to the April 2013 specifications BIG Thank You to HCA Healthcare and Cerner for all of their efforts! 13 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 ORYX Measure Reporting Options: Things to Remember 12 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 ORYX Measure Reporting Options: Things to Remember Quarterly data for 2014 core measure set selections must continue to be submitted through and including Fourth Quarter 2014 discharges. Fourth Quarter 2014 data are due at The Joint Commission no later than April 30, 2015. 13 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 ORYX Measure Reporting Options: Things to Remember Data Reporting Chart-abstracted data Quarterly submission of monthly data through a listed ORYX vendor Data received no later than four months after the close of the calendar quarter 24 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 ORYX Measure Reporting Options: Things to Remember Data Reporting ecqm Data Reported for a minimum of one calendar quarter OR up to three consecutive calendar quarters using a listed ORYX ecqm vendor Include either First Quarter 2015 and/or Second Quarter 2015 and/or Third Quarter 2015 data 25 Copyright, The Joint Commission

Data Reporting, Cont. Data may be submitted: Beginning as early as June 2015 Must be received no later than December 15, 2015 26 Copyright, The Joint Commission

Ongoing Compliance with ORYX Requirements Hospitals failing to submit data are at risk of failing to meet the Joint Commission s existing Accreditation Participation Requirement, APR.04.01.01, respecting the selection and use of ORYX measure sets through a listed ORYX vendor and placing their accreditation status at risk. 27 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 Temporary Suspension of PI.02.01.03, EP1 PI.02.01.03, EP1 Requires that hospitals achieve a composite performance measure rate of 85% on ORYX accountability measures transmitted to The Joint Commission. 18 Copyright, The Joint Commission

2015 Temporary Suspension of PI.02.01.03, EP1, Cont. In 2015, hospitals will be allowed to submit measure data using various submission methods, i.e.: Chart-abstraction and/or electronic clinical quality measures. Data will no longer have the same level of comparability across various submission methods This standard will be temporarily suspended for 2015 but will be reinstated at a future date to be determined. 19 Copyright, The Joint Commission

20 Copyright, The Joint Commission

The Joint Commission Will Continues its Leadership Role Driving improvement through measurement Continue to assess how our future performance measure reporting requirements can add even greater value to our customers 21 Copyright, The Joint Commission

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Updates Stephanie Wilson December 18, 2014

Voluntary ecqm Submission Deadline Extension The reporting deadline of Sunday, November 30, 2014 has been extended to December 31, 2014 for the 2014 Medicare EHR Incentive Program for eligible acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs) and Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program and the EHR Incentive Program. This message pertains only to hospitals electing to participate in the IQR voluntary electronically specified Clinical Quality Measures (ecqms) reporting option. This deadline extension does not impact IQR chart-abstracted measures deadlines or program requirements. 12/23/2014 33

JIRA Issue: QRDA-142 A JIRA issue was submitted related to a system update involving the lack of a Health Information Claim (HIC) number in the Quality Reporting Document Architecture (QRDA) file. The issue can be located at: https://jira.oncprojectracking.org/browse/qrda-142. The system update does not affect QRDA I file validation. The Measures Engine fix for this issue allows for correct calculation with or without the HICNUM OID being present. 12/23/2014 34

Resources CMS QRDA Submission Errors - Eligible Hospitals/Critical Access Hospitals Recorded webinar that helps users: Learn more about common CMS QRDA submission errors Understand pre-submission QRDA debugging approaches Link to recording: http://www.qualityreportingcenter.com/events/archive/iqr/ 12/23/2014 35

Contact Information Stephanie Wilson - IQR ecqm Program Support stephanie.wilson@hcqis.org ecqm General Program Questions https://cms-ip.custhelp.com 866.800.8765 or 844.472.4477, 7 a.m. 7 p.m. CT, Monday Friday (except holidays) 12/23/2014 36

QUESTIONS? 37