Pregnancy Dose Tdap and Postpartum Cocooning to Prevent Infant Pertussis: A Decision Analysis



Similar documents
Prevention of Pertussis Among Pregnant & Post Partum Women and Their Infants. Marilyn Michels RN MSN CIC Kathleen Curtis MS RN

Updated Recommendations for Use of Tdap in Pregnant Women

Tdap booster vaccine for Health Care Workers Frequently Asked Questions for Health Professionals

Vaccines in Pregnancy MARK H. SAWYER, MD UCSD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE RADY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO

Pertussis vaccine in both children and adults. Gaston De Serres. MD, PhD Institut national de santé publique du Québec, and Université Laval, Quebec

Why Pertussis matters..

Immunization Safety Office. Updates

Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published October 26, 2012 IMPORTANCE OF TIMING OF MATERNAL TDAP IMMUNIZATION AND

Pertussis antibodies in postpartum women and their newborns

Cocooning Strategies

Vaccination against pertussis (whooping cough) - the replacement of Repevax with Boostrix -IPV an update for registered healthcare practitioners

Pertussis: halting the epidemic by protecting infants. 34 BPJ Issue 51

APIC Practice Guidance Committee: Implementation Insights Prevention & Control of Pertussis

Tdap Vaccine Now Recommended for Every Pregnancy 1) Clinical Guidance 2) MDPH-Supplied Tdap Availability February 2013

Increasing Adult Tdap Vaccination Rates by Vaccinating Infant Caregivers in the Pediatric Office

Vaccination for Pregnant Women

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PERTUSSIS (WHOOPING COUGH)

Pertussis Cocooning: The Concept, Experiences and Lessons Learned

NSW Pertussis Control Program 2015

To access the evaluation and post-test, visit:

How Many Tdap Vaccines Are Given to San Diego County People?

Pertussis (Whooping Cough) Causes and Transmission. Causes. Transmission

This minute will remain draft until ratified by JCVI at its next meeting JOINT COMMITTEE ON VACCINATION AND IMMUNISATION

Current Trends in Immunization

This article is a CME/CE certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit:

Is your family at risk for pertussis?

Guidelines for Vaccinating Pregnant Women

Immunization Infrastructure: The Role of Section 317

Pertussis: Resurgence, Prevention and Role of the Ob/Gyn

Pertussis and Pregnancy

Laboratory confirmation requires isolation of Bordetella pertussis or detection of B. pertussis nucleic acid, preferably from a nasopharyngeal swab.

Welcome to the California Immunization Coalition Education Hour

Information on Measles and Whooping Cough: Vaccination and Disease

Frequently asked questions about whooping cough (pertussis)

What is whooping cough. (pertussis)? Information and Prevention. Ocument dn

Community Health Administration

Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: immunological effects in pregnant women, young infants and breast milk composition

PROTOCOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CLOSE CONTACTS OF PERTUSSIS INFECTION

Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published October 19, 2014

Gaps in Hospital Policies and Practices to Prevent Perinatal Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus

William Atkinson, MD, MPH Hepatitis B Vaccine Issues June 16, 2016

New Jersey Department of Health Vaccine Preventable Disease Program Pertussis FAQs. Date: January 10, 2013

Whooping cough and pregnancy

Remove this cover sheet before redistributing and replace it with your own. Please ensure that DPHHS is included on your HAN distribution list.

Reviewed at the Consensus group meeting at Hotel Tunga,August,2014 President FOGSI:DrSuchitraPandit

Pertussis. Chapter 15 Pertussis. August Pertussis. Vaccine introduced in 1952/53 (DTP) and 1996 (DTaP) NOTIFIABLE

Vaccination against pertussis (Whooping cough) for pregnant women Information for healthcare professionals

Knowledge and Acceptability about Adult Pertussis Immunization in Korean Women of Childbearing Age

TEMPORARY PROGRAMME PERTUSSIS VACCINATION FOR PREGNANT WOMEN

2 P age. Babies from Birth to Age 2

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2015 PAHAN ADV Pertussis in Centre County

Nurse Practitioner Healthcare Foundation

Adult Vaccination Frequently Asked Questions: The Basics

Vaccination Requirements for U.S. Immigration: Technical Instructions for Panel Physicians. December 14, 2009

Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: from research to practice

Whooping cough and pregnancy

Case Finding for Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C

Parents and Grandparents

The Reality Pertussis can be a serious illness, part icularly for babies and young children.

Immunisation schedule of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics: 2014 recommendations

Factsheet September Pertussis immunisation for pregnant women. Introduction

New Jersey Immunization Requirements

On the Ethics of Clinical Whole Genome Sequencing of Children

Immunization Program: Planning and Forecasting


The Immunization Office, located in the Student Health Center, is open year round to administer needed immunizations at a nominal fee.

Pertussis (whooping cough) immunisation for pregnant women the safest way to protect yourself and your baby

TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Safety of HPV vaccination: A FIGO STATEMENT

Methodology for Safety Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination During Pregnancy

Overall Goal and Objectives

Reducing Barriers, Enforcing Standards, and Providing Incentives to Immunize

Whooping Cough Vaccine for Pregnant Women

Alberta Health and Wellness Public Health Notifiable Disease Management Guidelines August 2011

Vaccination: It s what your child would choose. Your guide to childhood vaccinations.

H1N1 Vaccine Implementation Overview. Carol Friedman, D.O. Vaccine Implementation Team CDC

Resource Document 6: Tetanus Immunization. I. Introduction

Immunization Information for Blinn College Students

Pertussis Information for GPs and other Health Care Providers on Clinical and Public Health Management. March 2010

Vaccinating Every Adolescent Patient. Adjunct Professor of Family Medicine University of Minnesota at Mankato

2016 Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care

Chapter 20: Analysis of Surveillance Data

Medical Insurance - Teaching in the Hands of Patients and Their Families

[Immunization Program Strategic Plan ] Immunization Program

Health Professionals Advice: Azithromycin now fully funded 3 December 2012

Essential Contractual Language for Medical Necessity in Children

Pertussis (whooping cough) immunisation for pregnant women

Pertussis seroprevalence in adults, post-partum women and umbilical cord blood

What Will Open the Doors for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs From Traditionally Underserved Communities?

Immunization FAQs Required Vaccines for School Year

An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Update on Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy

Military Physicians: Area Field Consultants. Kelly Duke (Warner Robins) (404)

PERTUSSIS SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE PROTOCOL

Quality Improvement in Pediatric Well Care with an Electronic Record

Administering DTaP during the Shortage

Five Key Steps to Improve HPV Vaccination Rates in Your Practice. Tuesday, December 9, :00 AM ET

Are Booster Doses of Hepatitis B Vaccine Necessary?

MACHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2014 Normal, Illinois. Strategies to increase influenza vaccination rates among college students

IMMU-NEWS. Winter 2014 MESSAGE FROM THE SECTION ADMINISTRATOR. In this Issue: CHARLES H. ALEXANDER. Immunizing Florida. Protecting Health.

AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF MISSOURI

Transcription:

Pregnancy Dose Tdap and Postpartum Cocooning to Prevent Infant Pertussis: A Decision Analysis WHAT S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Infants aged,2 months are at highest risk for pertussis morbidity and mortality but are too young to receive pertussis vaccines. To protect young infants, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends mothers receive 1 dose of Tdap during pregnancy. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This article evaluates the effect of Tdap during pregnancy compared with postpartum Tdap and cocooning in preventing infant pertussis cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, as well as their relative cost-effectiveness. abstract BACKGROUND: Infants,2 months of age are at highest risk of pertussis morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended protecting young infants by cocooning or vaccination of postpartum mothers and other close contacts with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis, adsorbed (Tdap) booster vaccine. ACIP recommends pregnancy vaccination as a preferred and safe alternative to postpartum vaccination. The ACIP cocooning recommendation has not changed. METHODS: We used a cohort model reflecting US 2009 births and the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis schedule to simulate a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy compared with postpartum vaccination with or without vaccination of other close contacts (ie, cocooning). We analyzed infant pertussis cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, as well as direct disease, indirect, and public health costs for infants in the first year of life. All costs were updated to 2011 US dollars. RESULTS: Pregnancy vaccination could reduce annual infant pertussis incidence by more than postpartum vaccination, reducing cases by 33% versus 20%, hospitalizations by 38% versus 19%, and deaths by 49% versus 16%. Additional cocooning doses in a father and 1 grandparent could avert an additional 16% of cases but at higher cost. The cost per qualityadjusted life-year saved for pregnancy vaccination was substantially less than postpartum vaccination ($414 523 vs $1 172 825). CONCLUSIONS: Tdap vaccination during pregnancy could avert more infant cases and deaths at lower cost than postpartum vaccination, even when postpartum vaccination is combined with additional cocooning doses. Pregnancy dose vaccination is the preferred alternative to postpartum vaccination for preventing infant pertussis. Pediatrics 2013;131: e1748 e1756 AUTHORS: Andrew Terranella, MD, MPH, a,b Garrett R. Beeler Asay, PhD, c Mark L. Messonnier, PhD, c Thomas A. Clark, MD, MPH, b and Jennifer L. Liang, DVM, MPVM b a Epidemic Intelligence Service, Scientific Education and Professional Development Office, b Division of Bacterial Diseases, and c Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia KEY WORDS pertussis, pregnancy, Tdap, vaccines ABBREVIATIONS ACIP Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DTaP diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis NNDSS National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System QALY quality-adjusted life-year Tdap tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis, adsorbed VE vaccine effectiveness Drs Terranella and Asay contributed equally to this work. Dr Terranella designed the study, provided clinical expertise, collected base case data, conducted model analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; Dr Asay designed the study, provided economic expertise, collected base case data, conducted the model analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; Dr Messonnier conceptualized the initial study design, provided economic modeling subject matter expertise, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; Dr Clark conceptualized the overall study, provided pertussis subject matter expertise, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted; and Dr Liang supervised and coordinated the overall study, provided pertussis and pertussis vaccination subject matter expertise, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2012-3144 doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3144 Accepted for publication Mar 11, 2013 Address correspondence to Jennifer L. Liang, DVM, MPVM, 1600 Clifton Rd, Mail Stop C-25, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail: jliang@cdc. gov PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275); published in the public domain by the American Academy of Pediatrics FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. FUNDING: No external funding. e1748 TERRANELLA et al

ARTICLE Prevention of pertussis morbidity and mortality in infants remains a challenge to public health practitioners. From 2001 to 2010, there were 27 995 cases and 189 deaths due to pertussis in infants aged,1 year reported in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], unpublished data, 2011). Infants aged,2 months have an annual incidence of pertussis of 160 per 100 000 and account for 57% of all infant hospitalizations and 85% of all infant deaths (CDC, unpublished data, 2011). Pertussis is understood to be underreported, with true incidence among infants potentially twice the reported rate. 1 Protecting the youngest infants is challenging because they are too young to be vaccinated with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines. Of identified sources of pertussis transmission to infants, parents are the source in 50% to 55% of young infant cases, grandparents 6% to 8%, and siblings up to 20%. 2,3 Strategies have been proposed to prevent infant pertussis infection, including vaccinating parents and close contacts with the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis, adsorbed (Tdap) booster vaccine. 4 In 2005, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended a cocooning strategy in which mothers are vaccinated with Tdap immediately postpartum and all other close contacts are ideally vaccinated before an infant s birth. 5 However, programmatic challenges and institutional hurdles have prevented widespread implementation of cocooning both in the United States and other countries. 4,6 In 2011, the ACIP recommended vaccinating pregnant women during the second or third trimester as the preferred strategy to postpartum vaccination. 7 Vaccination of mothers during pregnancy would allow maternal antibody production to reach protective levels by the time of delivery, providing protection directly to the mother and indirectly to the infant. 8,9 A pregnancy dose of Tdap could also provide direct protection to the infant through transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. These maternally derived antibodies persist in infants for 36 to 55 days at levels consistent with those that might confer protection. 10 12 Before the current study, the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of pregnancy vaccination and postpartum/ cocooning had not been evaluated in the United States; however, one study in the Netherlands found that both interventions were cost-effective. 13 The current study presents the results of a decision and cost-effectiveness model comparing a pregnancy vaccination strategy with postpartum vaccination with or without vaccination of other close contacts (ie, cocooning) for preventing infant pertussis in the United States. METHODS A Markov cohort model was used to calculate the health benefits, cost, and cost-effectiveness of pregnancy vaccination of mothers in the third trimester and of postpartum cocooning. The model used the 2009 US birth cohort of 4 131 019 infants followed for 1 year. 14 Incidence and expected number of infant pertussis cases were calculated by using 2000 2007 National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) data. Although some studies have documented underreporting of pertussis in infants to be as high as 50%, we conservatively assumed a 15% underreporting rate for infant pertussis. 1 Probability of hospitalization with respiratory disease and death were calculated according to month of age from 2000 2007 NNDSS data. Annual probability of encephalopathy and death were also calculated from NNDSS data. The average annual incidence of pertussis in infants aged,1 year was 62.6 cases per 100 000 infants. We assumed a duration of infant illness of 80 days. 15 Age-specific incidence according to month of life is shown in Table 1. Three strategies were analyzed: a pregnancy dose of Tdap, a postpartum dose of Tdap, and limited cocooning doses including the postpartum mother, the father, and one grandparent. The strategies were compared with the primary DTaP series with no pregnancy or cocooning doses (henceforth referred to as the base case). There were no data on Tdap vaccination TABLE 1 Age-Specific Incidence of Pertussis in Infants and Associated Disease Probabilities, United States (2000 2007) Age, mo Incidence/100 000 a Hospitalization With Respiratory Illness Hospitalization With Neurologic Illness Deaths/1000,1 12.4 0.66 0.01 22.36 1 18.9 0.61 0.01 9.54 2 15.3 0.50 0.01 4.49 3 8.9 0.37 0.01 0.41 4 5.7 0.30 0.01 0.63 5 3.2 0.23 0.01 1.14 6 2.4 0.17 0.01 1.53 7 1.6 0.18 0.01 0.00 8 1.5 0.13 0.01 0.00 9 1.4 0.13 0.01 0.00 10 1.1 0.12 0.01 0.00 11 1.4 0.11 0.01 0.00 Results were calculated by using NNDSS data. a Incidence per month; includes 15% underreporting. PEDIATRICS Volume 131, Number 6, June 2013 e1749

coverage during pregnancy; therefore, vaccination coverage of 72% was used based on reported postpartum coverage under an existing postpartum cocooning program in the United States with ideal conditions. 16 The same coverage was used for postpartum doses and cocooning doses. For all adults, vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 85%. Tdap VE between 65% and 72% has been documented, but these evaluations were conducted among adolescents 1 to 4 years after vaccination and therefore may include waning of immunity. 17,18 The higher VE was chosen to reflect that effectiveness would not have significantly waned between vaccine administration and up to 6 months postpartum. Under a pregnancy vaccination strategy, mothers were vaccinated during their third trimester of pregnancy and were considered to have full efficacy of the vaccine at the time of delivery; fathers were not vaccinated. Transfer of maternal antibodies was assumed to be 100%, witheffectivenessintheinfantof60%. 10 12 The duration of maternal antibody protection was assumed to last 2 months. 10,11 To model potential interference of maternal antibodies on an infant s immune response to the primary DTaP series, the risk for pertussis disease was increased by 10% during the third and fourth months of infant life. For postpartum vaccination, mothers were assumed to be vaccinated immediately postpartum with a 2-week delay in protection, reflecting observed antipertussis antibody kinetics. 8 For cocooning, parameters for postpartum vaccination of mothers remained the same; a father and grandparent were vaccinated before delivery and considered immune at the time of infant birth. Mothers and fathers were assumed to be the source of infection in 35% and 15% of infant cases, respectively. 3 Grandparents were assumed to be the source in 6% of cases (Table 2). 2 We assumed a vaccine cost per dose of $37.60 and an administrative fee of $20. 19 Costs of disease were obtained from the literature. 20 Direct disease costs included laboratory tests, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, radiographs, and antibiotics (Table 2). Direct TABLE 2 Epidemiologic and Cost Variables Used in the Model Variable Base Case Estimate Range Distribution a Source Vaccine efficacy 85% 62% 92% b general Skoff et al 17 ; Ward et al 33 Vaccine delivery Pregnancy 72% 25% 85% b general NIS, Healy and Rench 16, author assumption Postpartum 72% 25% 85% b general NIS, Healy and Rench 16, author assumption Paternal 72% 6% 85% b general Author assumption Maternal antibody efficacy 60% 5% 100% b general Author assumption Duration of antibody protection 2 mo Shakib et al 10 ; Healy et al 11 Blunting effect 10% 0% 50% b general Author assumption Discount rate 3% Infant disease duration 80 days Lee et al 15 Underreporting 15% 5% 50% b general Author assumption, Cortese et al 1 Disease costs, 2011 $US Lee et al 15 Outpatient respiratory illness Medical b $117 175 Nonmedical c $49 Inpatient respiratory illness Medical $7740 11 610 Nonmedical $514 Neurologic illness Medical $7431 11 147 Nonmedical $787 Death Medical $16 707 25 061 Nonmedical $777 Public health response $2269 CDC 21 Disease QALY Lee et al 34 Outpatient respiratory illness 0.85 Inpatient respiratory illness 0.58 Neurologic illness 0.51 Vaccine costs, 2011 $US CDC 19 Vaccine price $37.6 $18.8 Vaccine administration $20 $10 NIS, National Immunization Survey. a Distributions used in Monte Carlo simulations. b Medical costs included laboratory tests, outpatient/inpatient visits, radiography, and antibiotics. c Nonmedical costs included time missed from work, transportation, child care, and over-the-counter medications. e1750 TERRANELLA et al

ARTICLE nonmedical costs included missed time from work, child care, transportation, and over-the-counter drugs. We also included public health response costs. 21 All costs were updated to 2011 US dollars by using the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (Health Care). 22 Outcomes analyzed include pertussis cases, hospitalizations and deaths prevented, and quality-adjusted lifeyears (QALYs) saved. One QALY is defined as 1 year of perfect health. In our model, we valued perfect health as 1 and death as 0. To reflect the possibility that infants are not all born healthy, we valued perfect health at.93 in a sensitivity analysis. We calculated total program costs and cost-effectiveness ratios in terms of cost in US dollars per QALYs saved and cases averted. All costs and health benefits were discounted to present value by using an annual discount rate of 3%. Cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated by using discounted QALYs, cases, and hospitalizations. We modeled each intervention as a mutually exclusive strategy and compared pregnancy, postpartum, and cocooning with the base case by using average cost-effectiveness ratios. We measured direct medical and nonmedical costs for infant disease with an analytic horizon of 1 year. The model was built by using Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of varying vaccine coverage and effectiveness, maternal antibody effectiveness, level of underreporting, and the effects of blunting. We conducted a threshold analysis to find the Tdap cost per dose (including administration fee) that would result in cost per QALY saved ratios of $50 000, $100 000, and $150 000. We used a Monte Carlo simulation with Latin hypercube sampling to estimate a range of outcomes for all variables (@Risk 5.7; Palisades, 2012). RESULTS Health Benefits Under the base case, an estimated 3041 infant pertussis cases would occur annually, resulting in 1463 hospitalizations and 22 deaths (Table 3). Postpartum vaccination could avert 596 infant cases annually, a 20% reduction from the base case. Moving the postpartum dose to late pregnancy could avert 1012 infant cases annually, a 33% reduction from the base case. As part of the cocooning strategy, postpartum vaccination plus father and a grandparent could avert 987 infant cases annually (32% reduction from base case). A majority of infant pertussis cases averted in both strategies would occur in the first 2 months of life (Fig 1). Pregnancy vaccination also prevented a greater proportion of infant deaths and hospitalizations; pregnancy vaccination reduced infant hospitalizations by 38% and deaths by 49% relative to base case, compared with reductions of 32% and 29% for postpartum vaccination with cocooning. Overall, pregnancy vaccination resulted in more QALYs saved per year when compared with postpartum vaccination and cocooning (396 QALYs vs 253 QALYs saved). TABLE 3 Health Benefits, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness Ratios Variable Total Cases % Reduction a Base Case Pregnancy Postpartum Cocooning b,c Pregnancy Postpartum Cocooning b,c Cases 3041 2029 2445 2054 33 20 32 Hospitalizations Respiratory illness 1420 876 1152 970 38 19 32 Neurologic disorder 43 28 34 29 33 20 32 QALYs lost (discounted) Without death 186 120 150 127 35 19 32 Death only 670 341 564 502 49 16 25 Total 857 461 714 604 46 17 30 QALY s lost (undiscounted) 1927 1006 1614 1437 48 16 25 Deaths 22 11 19 16 49 16 29 YLL (discounted) 670 341 564 422 49 16 29 YLL 1740 886 1463 1239 49 16 29 Total disease costs $19 837 821 $12 581 562 $16 047 843 $13 498 286 37 19 32 Program cost $171 172 903 $171 172 903 $513 518 710 Net cost $163 916 644 $167 382 925 $507 179 174 Cost per case averted $161 938 $280 632 $513 714 Cost per hospitalization averted $293 463 $605 499 $1 092 011 Cost per QALY saved $414 523 $1 172 825 $2 005 940 Cost per life-year saved $497 856 $1 568 164 $2 629 309 Cost values are given in 2011 US dollars. YLL, years of life lost. a Relative to base case. b Cocooning consists of postpartum vaccination, plus father and 1 grandparent. c We compare cocooning doses with the base case, providing average reductions for all doses combined. PEDIATRICS Volume 131, Number 6, June 2013 e1751

FIGURE 1 Number of expected pertussis cases by age in months using different vaccination strategies. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness The total annual disease costs and program costs are presented in Table 3. The annual cost for pregnancy or postpartum vaccination programs, with an estimated 3 million vaccine doses annually, was $171.2 million. Expanding a postpartum strategy to include a father and 1 grandparent would add an additional $342 million dollars annually (program cost for all 3 doses was $513 million). The cost per QALY saved under pregnancy vaccination ($414 523) was lower than both postpartum vaccination ($1.2 million) and cocooning ($2.0 million). Our model predicted that for the same program cost, pregnancy vaccination would save more QALYs than postpartum vaccination (396 vs 143 or 277% more QALYs). Additional cocooning doses could increase QALYs saved; however, cocooning did not save as many QALYs as pregnancy vaccination and had a higher program cost. Pregnancy vaccination was also superior in other effectiveness measures such as cost per case, hospitalization, and death averted. Sensitivity Analysis We performed 1-way sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of a range of values on the model (Table 4). Under nearly all scenarios, a pregnancy vaccination strategy would result in fewer overall cases and deaths at lower cost per case averted and per QALY saved. To account for possible disparate vaccination coverage among pregnant women versus postpartum women, we compared the reduction in cases and deaths between a pregnancy program with 40% vaccine coverage and a postpartum program with 72% coverage. Under this reduced coverage scenario, our model also showed that pregnancy vaccination would reduce all adverse health outcomes by more than postpartum vaccination. The greatest impact was on deaths; pregnancy vaccination was predicted to reduce deaths by 27% relative to base case; postpartum vaccination had an estimated reduction of 14%. When analyzing the effect of vaccine dose cost on cost-effectiveness, our threshold analysis revealed that under base case values, vaccine cost per dose (vaccine plus administration cost) would need to be $9, $16, and $22.50 to achieve a cost per QALY ratio of $50 000, $100 000, and $150 000, respectively. However, if we increase underreporting to 50%, vaccine dose costs could be higher to achieve similar thresholds ($16, $27, and $38, respectively). e1752 TERRANELLA et al

ARTICLE TABLE 4 One-Way and Multiway Sensitivity Analyses Variable Total Cases Total Deaths Cost ($US)/Case Averted Cost ($US)/QALY Saved Pregnancy Postpartum Pregnancy Postpartum Pregnancy Postpartum Pregnancy Postpartum Base case a 2029 2445 11 19 161 938 280 632 414 523 1 172 825 Vaccine coverage, % 25 2727 2834 18 21 182 131 280 632 404 045 1 172 825 85 1854 2337 10 18 163 041 280 632 424 994 1 172 825 VE, % 62 2178 2606 12 20 191 108 387 095 456 126 1 617 757 72 2113 2536 12 19 177 269 332 449 437 113 1 389 380 92 1983 2395 11 18 154 699 258 796 403 246 1 081 568 Maternal antibody effectiveness, % 5 2431 2445 17 19 274 115 280 632 877 740 1 172 825 20 2322 2445 16 19 231 074 280 632 674 933 1 172 825 85 1846 2445 9 19 135 927 280 632 332 476 1 172 825 100 1736 2445 7 19 123 822 280 632 296 727 1 172 825 Blunting, % 0 1950 2445 11 19 149 860 280 632 401 327 1 172 825 20 2107 2445 12 19 176 042 280 632 428 528 1 172 825 50 2342 2445 12 19 237 299 280 632 476 221 1 172 825 Underreporting, % 5 1815 2187 10 17 181 833 314 395 465 449 1 313 929 25 2299 2770 13 21 142 044 246 869 363 597 1 031 722 50 3449 4156 19 32 92 306 162 461 236 281 678 962 Vaccine, administration cost ($18.80, $10) 2029 2445 11 19 77 385 137 139 198 086 573 135 Health Utilities Index (0.93) 2029 2445 11 19 161 938 280 632 445 724 1 261 102 Best case pregnancy b 1474 2395 5 18 121 956 280 632 306 849 1 172 825 Worst case pregnancy c 2635 2445 17 19 413 992 280 632 844 321 1 172 825 Cost values are given in 2011 US dollars. a Vaccine coverage, 72%; VE, 85%; transmission rate, 35% (0 11 months); maternal antibody effectiveness, 72%; duration of protection, 2 months; blunting, 15%; underreporting, 15%; incidence at 2000 2007 average, hospitalization rate at 2000 2007 average. b Best case pregnancy: blunting, 0%; maternal antibody effectiveness, 92%; and all other parameters at base case values. c Worst case pregnancy: blunting, 50%; maternal antibody effectiveness, 20%; and all other parameters at base case values. Under our assumptions, a Monte Carlo simulation showed large differences in health outcomes between the postpartum and pregnancy scenarios(fig 2). The mean difference in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths (with inter-90th percentile range) between the 2 programs was 416 (23 804), 283 (72 495), and 5.4 (1.5 9.4), respectively. Pregnancy vaccination was favored for all 3 outcomes. DISCUSSION We present the results of the first decision and cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States comparing the use of pregnancy Tdap vaccination with postpartum and cocooning vaccination for preventing infant pertussis. Our analysis showed that a Tdap dose during pregnancy could avert more infant pertussis cases, hospitalizations, and deaths than postpartum or cocooning strategies. Reductions in morbidity and mortality could be achieved by shifting the timing of vaccination from postpartum to late second or third trimester of pregnancy and at no additional cost. The primary drivers of the reduction in infant illness were earlier indirect protection from vaccinating the mother before infant birth and the provision of direct immunity to the infant through transplacental transfer of antibodies. These benefits were concentrated early in infancy when morbidity and mortality are highest. Additional cocooning doses in the father and a grandparent could approach the number of cases averted by pregnancy vaccination; however, because these additional reductions are primarily in older infant age groups, the number of hospitalizations and deaths averted were not comparable. In terms of cost-effectiveness, pregnancy vaccination was preferred to postpartum vaccination or cocooning under a robust set of situations. Changes in VE and coverage, maternal antibody effect, and potential blunting of efficacy of the primary DTaP vaccine series did not alter the relative benefits of a pregnancy vaccination. In our scenarios, because women vaccinated during pregnancy were protected at delivery, a 1-time pregnancy dose strategy was more effective than a postpartum strategy, even if the child received no maternal antibodies. Furthermore, even with a 50% increase in the risk of disease from interference with infant antibody responses to DTaP (blunting), pregnancy vaccination averted more cases and was more cost-effective than postpartum vaccination and cocooning. Altering other variables in the model changed cost-effectiveness values for PEDIATRICS Volume 131, Number 6, June 2013 e1753

FIGURE 2 Cost per QALY saved, Pregnancy and Postpartum Results of Monte Carlo simulation for potential costs per QALY saved using a range of model inputs under a pregnancy vaccination strategy versus postpartum vaccination strategy. Mean (minimum, maximum) cost per QALY for pregnancy vaccination: $430 000 ($244 000 $757 000); Mean cost per QALY for postpartum vaccination 5 $1.2 million ($778 000 $1.63 million). Simulation conducted using 1000 random draws with Latin hypercube sampling. each of the strategies, but a pregnancy dose remained the most effective in preventing infant pertussis and was the most cost-effective. Concerns about vaccinating pregnant women with Tdap remain, including vaccine safety and the presence and magnitude of blunting of the infant immune response to DTaP. Regarding vaccine safety, data from vaccine manufacturer pregnancy registries and the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System have identified no unusual patterns or occurrence of serious adverse events, and Td has been used safely worldwide in pregnant women to prevent neonatal tetanus. 7,23 The clinical implications of potential blunting are unknown, and results from studies using DTaP have been mixed. 12,24 The current study analyzed a range of blunting effects and found that even if pregnancy vaccination increased the risk of pertussis by 50% in 3- and 4-month-old infants, annual infant pertussis cases did not exceed the number of cases observed from postpartum vaccination or cocooning. Increased cases in the third and fourth months of life were unlikely to result in significant increases in hospitalizations and deaths because the risk of severe and fatal pertussis declined substantially after 2 months of age; in addition, even a single dose of DTaP protects against death and severe pertussis morbidity. 25 Questions regarding the feasibility of pregnancyvaccinationprogramsremain. This study used 72% coverage based on coverage of postpartum mothers achieved under a well-supported cocooning program, which provides vaccine at no charge. 16 When reducing coverage of the pregnancy dose and maintaining coverage of the postpartum dose (40% vs 72%), a pregnancy vaccination program still achieved reductions comparable to postpartum vaccination and prevented twice as many deaths. Nevertheless, achieving high pregnancy coverage, while challenging, is feasible. The platform for a pregnancy Tdap dose already exists through routine prenatal care visits in which providers have numerous opportunities for education and vaccination. Many obstetrician/gynecologists now routinely offer human papillomavirus and influenza vaccines, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports Tdap vaccination for pregnant women. 26 28 The obstetrician/ gynecologist experience with influenza vaccine has demonstrated that routine vaccine coverage of $50% can be achieved in pregnant women. Higher coverage levels (70% 86%) are achievable when the influenza vaccines are routinely discussed with pregnant women and offered by their obstetricians. 29 31 This existing platform could be expanded to include Tdap. Conversely, postpartum vaccination and cocooning programs do not have existing infrastructure and require development of new platforms for vaccine delivery through coordination of hospitals and multiple providers to reach postpartum mothers, fathers, e1754 TERRANELLA et al

ARTICLE and other contacts. 9,16 In our analysis, we used a best case scenario vaccinating close contacts before delivery. However, most family members are not vaccinated until after the infant is born, reducing cocooning effectiveness. We also used high vaccination coverage (72%) among close contacts, although Tdap coverage in all adults aged 19 to 64 years in 2010 was only 12.5%. 32 Achieving higher postpartum maternal coverage is difficult and resource intense. 16 However, with a shift in emphasis from postpartum to pregnancy, pregnant women are educated earlier and they, in turn, could educate and encourage family members as well as other contacts to get vaccinated before the infant is born. Despite the strength of the findings, this study has several limitations. First, we excluded direct and indirect benefits to adultsfrom vaccination with Tdap, which underestimates the cost-effectiveness of all strategies. Second, data were not available to further characterize infant health outcomes according to ICU admissions, pneumonias, or other pertussis-related complications, and therefore we might have underestimated pertussis costs. Third, effectiveness of maternal antibodies in preventing infant pertussis is unknown, as is the clinical effect of blunting, forcing us to rely largely on expert opinion of possible effects. Fourth, this analysis is based on simulation data only because no clinical trials have been published. Also, this study used a static model to estimate epidemiologic changes; use of a dynamic model would increase the strength of the results. Fifth, we analyzed a limited set of cocooning contacts: mothers, fathers, and 1 grandparent. The ACIP recommends cocooning all close contacts of an infant; however, our model showed that the benefits of a pregnancy dose outweighed the benefits of postpartum vaccination, and additional Tdap doses for other family members would have incrementally higher costs with decreasing relative benefit. Finally, we only included a slight inflation in cases to account for underreporting; cost-effectiveness of all strategies would improve markedly if incidence was higher at baseline. 1 In June 2011, the ACIP recommended Tdap for all previously unvaccinated pregnant women. 7 Factors considered included absolute reduction in cases, morbidity and mortality, and the disproportionate impact of this intervention on young infants. Although cost per QALY was higher than other commonly used metrics, the pregnancy dose was more cost-effective than previously recommended Tdap strategies. By recommending Tdap during pregnancy, these vaccination guidelines now target the timing of vaccination to achieve maximum impact at the least cost. Although initial challenges remain in implementation, when compared with cocooning, pregnancy vaccination offers an economically efficient method to substantially reduce infant pertussis morbidity and mortality. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge Dr Nancy Messonnier of the Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch at the CDC for her leadership and subject matter expertise as we developed this model; Ms Amanda Faulkner of the CDC for her assistance in reviewing national pertussis reporting data; and the ACIP Pertussis Vaccine Working Group membersfor theirguidanceandreviewofour analysis. REFERENCES 1. Cortese MM, Baughman AL, Zhang R, Srivastava PU, Wallace GS. Pertussis hospitalizations among infants in the United States, 1993 to 2004. Pediatrics. 2008;121 (3):484 492 2. Wendelboe AM, Njamkepo E, Bourillon A, et al; Infant Pertussis Study Group. Transmission of Bordetella pertussis to young infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(4): 293 299 3. Bisgard KM, Pascual FB, Ehresmann KR, et al. Infant pertussis: who was the source? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(11):985 989 4. McIntyre P, Wood N. Pertussis in early infancy: disease burden and preventive strategies. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;22(3): 215 223 5. Kretsinger K, Broder KR, Cortese MM, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adults: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and recommendation of ACIP, supported by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), for use of Tdap among health-care personnel. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-17):1 37 6. de La Rocque F, Grimprel E, Gaudelus J, et al. Vaccination in parents of young infants survey [in French]. Arch Pediatr. 2007;14(12):1472 1476 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant women and persons who have or anticipate having close contact with an infant aged,12 months Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(41): 1424 1426 8. Halperin BA, Morris A, Mackinnon-Cameron D, et al. Kinetics of the antibody response to tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine in women of childbearing age and postpartum women. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53 (9):885 892 9. Munoz F, Englund J. Infant pertussis: is cocooning the answer? Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(9):893 896 10. Shakib JH, Ralston S, Raissy HH, Stoddard GJ, Edwards KM, Byington CL. Pertussis PEDIATRICS Volume 131, Number 6, June 2013 e1755

antibodies in postpartum women and their newborns. J Perinatol. 2010;30(2):93 97 11. Healy CM, Munoz FM, Rench MA, Halasa NB, Edwards KM, Baker CJ. Prevalence of pertussis antibodies in maternal delivery, cord, and infant serum. J Infect Dis. 2004; 190(2):335 340 12. Van Savage J, Decker MD, Edwards KM, Sell SH, Karzon DT. Natural history of pertussis antibody in the infant and effect on vaccine response. J Infect Dis. 1990;161(3):487 492 13. Westra TA, de Vries R, Tamminga JJ, Sauboin CJ, Postma MJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various pertussis vaccination strategies primarily aimed at protecting infants in the Netherlands. Clin Ther. 2010;32(8):1479 1495 14. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary Data for 2009. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statisitcs. 2010; (3):1 29 15. Lee GM, Murphy TV, Lett S, et al. Cost effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(3):186 193 16. Healy CM, Rench MA, Castagnini LA, Baker CJ. Pertussis immunization in a high-risk postpartum population. Vaccine. 2009;27 (41):5599 5602 17. Skoff TH, Martin K, Cohn A, et al. Tdap vaccine effectiveness among adolescents: a case-control study in Minnesota. Presented at: 9th International Bordetella Symposium; Baltimore, MD, September 30 October 30, 2010 18. Wei SC, Tatti K, Cushing K, et al. Effectiveness of adolescent and adult tetanus, reduced-dose diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine against pertussis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(3):315 321 19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) price list. Available at: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/awardees/vaccinemanagement/price-list/index.html. Accessed February 2, 2013 20. Lee GM, Murphy TV, Lett S, et al. Cost effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(3):186 193 21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Local health department costs associated with response to a school-based pertussis outbreak Omaha, Nebraska, September-November 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(1):5 9 22. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Price indexes for personal consumption expenditures (health care). Available at: www.bea.gov/ itable/itable.cfm?reqid=12&step=1&acrdn=2. Accessed January 24, 2013 23. Zheteyeva YA, Moro PL, Tepper NK, et al. Adverse event reports after tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccines in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):59.e1 7 24. Englund JA, Anderson EL, Reed GF, et al. The effect of maternal antibody on the serologic response and the incidence of adverse reactions after primary immunization with acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Pediatrics. 1995;96(3 pt 2):580 584 25. Tiwari T, Baughman AL, Clark T. Risk factors for pertussis-related infant deaths reported to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States, 1991 2000. Presented at: 9th International Bordetella Symposium; Baltimore, MD, September 30 October 30, 2010 26. Leddy MA, Anderson BL, Gall S, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the HPV vaccine: practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22(4):239 246 27. Kissin DM, Power ML, Kahn EB, et al. Attitudes and practices of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1074 1080 28. Update on immunization and pregnancy: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination. Committee opinion. Available at: www. acog.org/ /media/committee%20opinions/ Committee%20on%20Obstetric%20Practice/ co521.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20120508t1116360043. Accessed April 8, 2013 29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women United States, 2010-11 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(32):1078 1082 30. Steelfisher GK, Blendon RJ, Bekheit MM, et al. Novel pandemic A (H1N1) influenza vaccination among pregnant women: motivators and barriers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6 suppl 1):S116 S123 31. Ding H, Santibanez TA, Jamieson DJ, et al. Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women National 2009 H1N1 Flu Survey (NHFS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204(6 suppl 1):S96 S106 32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Noninfluenza vaccination coverage among adults United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(4):66 72 33. Ward JI, Cherry JD, Chang SJ, et al; APERT Study Group. Efficacy of an acellular pertussis vaccine among adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1555 1563 34. Lee GM, Salomon JA, LeBaron CW, Lieu TA. Health-state valuations for pertussis: methods for valuing short-term health states. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:17 e1756 TERRANELLA et al

Pregnancy Dose Tdap and Postpartum Cocooning to Prevent Infant Pertussis: A Decision Analysis Andrew Terranella, Garrett R. Beeler Asay, Mark L. Messonnier, Thomas A. Clark and Jennifer L. Liang Pediatrics 2013;131;e1748; originally published online May 27, 2013; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3144 Updated Information & Services References Citations Subspecialty Collections Permissions & Licensing Reprints including high resolution figures, can be found at: /content/131/6/e1748.full.html This article cites 24 articles, 7 of which can be accessed free at: /content/131/6/e1748.full.html#ref-list-1 This article has been cited by 10 HighWire-hosted articles: /content/131/6/e1748.full.html#related-urls This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Infectious Disease /cgi/collection/infectious_diseases_sub Vaccine/Immunization /cgi/collection/vaccine:immunization_sub Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: /site/misc/permissions.xhtml Information about ordering reprints can be found online: /site/misc/reprints.xhtml PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

Pregnancy Dose Tdap and Postpartum Cocooning to Prevent Infant Pertussis: A Decision Analysis Andrew Terranella, Garrett R. Beeler Asay, Mark L. Messonnier, Thomas A. Clark and Jennifer L. Liang Pediatrics 2013;131;e1748; originally published online May 27, 2013; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3144 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: /content/131/6/e1748.full.html PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.