Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING AGREEMENTS



Similar documents
**************** UNCLASSIFIED / **************** Precedence: ROUTINE DTG: Z Aug 12 Originator: DON CIO WASHINGTON DC(UC) UNCLASSIFIED//

Subj: CIVILIAN EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: CIVILIAN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

The Navy s Management of Software Licenses Needs Improvement

Subj: CYBERSPACE/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY WORKFORCE CONTINUOUS LEARNING

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY JAN 3a NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Encl: (1) Surface Warfare Tactical Requirement Group Membership

Department of the Navy ebusiness Operations Office

Report No. D February 5, Contingency Planning for DoD Mission-Critical Information Systems

(a) CNO memo 1524 Ser ~00/ of 31 October 08 (NOTAL)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC MCO LPP 12 May 97

MANDATORY PUBLIC WEB SITE MIGRATIONS TO OFFICIAL MARINE CORPS ENTERPRISE-WIDE WEB HOSTING ENVIRONMENT

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

(1) Acquisition Professional of the Year. (3) Major Acquisition Activity Award. (4) Field Acquisition Activity Award

Subj: MANAGEMENT OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) AND OTHER SENIOR EXECUTIVE POSITIONS IN THE MARINE CORPS

Information Technology

D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY

OPNAVINST A N4 5 Jun Subj: OPERATING MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES AND GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT

**************** UNCLASSIFIED / **************** Precedence: ROUTINE DTG: Z Aug 12 Originator: DON CIO WASHINGTON DC(UC)

SECNAVINST A ASN(M&RA) 01 Dec Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY VOLUNTARY EDUCATION (VOLED) PROGRAM

DODIG July 18, Navy Did Not Develop Processes in the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System to Account for Military Equipment Assets

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CH I EF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

How To Manage The Defense Information Technology System

STRATEGIC SOURCING. Opportunities Exist to Better Manage Information Technology Services Spending

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

OPNAVINST A USFF/CNO N3/N5 10 Nov 2014

D E PAR TME NT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECR ET A R Y 1000 N A VY PENT A G ON W A SHI N G T ON D C

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

MCO D RFR Mar 01

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. Civilian Cybersecurity Workforce

The Cost and Economic Analysis Program

VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 3: FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1996 COMPLIANCE, EVALUATION, AND REPORTING SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

ClOP CHAPTER Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 39.1

DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION. Additional Action Needed to Achieve Intended Outcomes

Information Technology (IT) Investment Management Insight Policy for Acquisition

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES. Subj: IMPROVING COMMUNICATION DURING COMPETITIVE SOURCE SELECTIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND 716 SICARD STREET, SE, SUITE 1000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC

PAC B.03/ April 24, PAC-005(R) MEMORANDUM FOR REGIONAL DIRECTORS, DCAA HEADS OF PRINCIPAL STAFF ELEMENTS, HQ, DCAA

Department of the Navy

Marine Corps. Commercial Mobile Device Strategy

OAIG-AUD (ATTN: AFTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General, Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. Naval Audit Service. Audit Report. Unnecessary Collection of Personally Identifiable Information in the Department of the Navy

OPNAVINST N00 4 Jun 2012

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ASD(PA))

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Software Sustainment Issues and Challenges

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY

ESTABLISHMENT, MANAGEMENT, AND CONTROL OF THE FISHER HOUSE PROGRAM

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic

Subj: NAVY MEDICINE DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROL PROGRAM

Navy s Contract/Vendor Pay Process Was Not Auditable

Acquisition. Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D ) June 19, 2002

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CYBERSECURITY/INFORMATION ASSURANCE WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT, OVERSIGHT, AND COMPLIANCE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Contract Management Agency INSTRUCTION. Defense Acquisition Executive Summary (DAES)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Allegations of the Defense Contract Management Agency s Performance in Administrating Selected Weapon Systems Contracts (D )

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Financial Management

COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (C4&IT) INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT POLICY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC Subj: Civilian Workforce Management: Managing to Payroll

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense MANUAL. Procedures for Ensuring the Accessibility of Electronic and Information Technology (E&IT) Procured by DoD Organizations

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget

POLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL. 1. Purpose. To update and clarify policies concerning the Naval Postgraduate School.

Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Business System Deficiencies

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D )

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

R Z DEC 15 MARADMIN 648/15 MSGID/GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC PR// SUBJ/MCBUL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (FM)

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS

DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC

STATEMENT OF CHARLES EDWARDS DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BEFORE THE

Comptroller (00F) Financial Management Department Organization N8

UTILIZATION OF NAVAL FLIGHT SURGEONS, AEROS PACE MEDIC I NE TECHNICIANS, AND NAVAL AVIATION MEDICAL EXAM I NERS

NOV q11. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012

Subj: NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE OFFICER CONTINUATION PAY PROGRAM

Navy and Marine Corps Have Weak Procurement Processes for Cost reimbursement Contract Issuance and Management

Funding Invoices to Expedite the Closure of Contracts Before Transitioning to a New DoD Payment System (D )

Improvements Needed for Triannual Review Process at Norfolk Ship Support Activity

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with DoD Directive (DoDD) (Reference (a)), this Instruction:

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ACQUISITION) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & COMPTROLLER 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 FEB 2 2 2012 Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING Ref: (a) Under Secretary of the Navy Memorandum of December 3, 2010, Subj: Department of the Navy (DON) Information Technology (IT) /Cyberspace Efficiency Initiatives and Realignment (b) Department of the Navy (DON) ChiefInformation Officer (CIO) Memorandum of December 20,2010, Subj: Department of the Navy (DON) Information Technology (IT)/Cyberspace Efficiency Initiatives and Realignment Tasking (c) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 208.74 (d) DFARS and Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) 208.7403 (e) Department of the Navy Budget Guidance Memorandum BG 11-1 G of April 19, 2011, Subj: Guidance for the Preparation and Submission of the FY 2013 Program/Budget Estimates for the Department of the Navy (DON) Program/Budget Review (t) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget Memorandum of September 29,2011, Subj: Fiscal Year 2012 Guidance for Financial Recording ofinformation Technology Obligations and Expenditures in STARS (g) DON CIO Memorandum of September 19,2011, Subj: Release of Department of the Navy Enterprise Architecture Version 3.0.000 Encl: (1) Proposed List of Department of the Navy Enterprise Licensing Agreement (DON ELA) Opportunities (2) Department of the Navy Enterprise Licensing Agreement (DON ELA) Waiver Request Process The purpose of this joint memorandum is to announce the mandatory use of Department of the Navy (DON) Enterprise Licensing Agreements (ELAs) by all DON organizations and programs to achieve maximum cost savings. Effective immediately, where a DON ELA exists, any software products, hardware, and related services offered by that ELA must be procured using that ELA, including those procured by government purchase cards. Furthermore, this policy establishes business rules that apply after a determination has been made that a product meets a validated need, based on technical requirements consistent with procurement regulations. Once the determination has been made, this policy establishes use of the enterprise vehicles as the means to procure the product.

Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING In most cases the DON ELAs will be primarily software product focused. In some cases, however, DON ELAs may include software related services and hardware components, such as switches, routers or database appliances in the agreement, as well as related services. Related services are defined as services necessary for the effective use of the commercial software product, including software maintenance. Software maintenance is defined as services normally provided by a software company as standard services at established catalogue or market prices (e.g., the right to receive and use upgraded versions of software, updates, and revisions). Reference (a) tasks the Department to leverage its expertise to be more efficient in its Information Technology (IT) procurement and business processes, while being supportive of Department of Defense (DoD) IT consolidation efforts. Reference (b) established eight DON IT/Cyberspace Efficiency Integrated Product Teams (IPTs). The focus of the Enterprise Software Licensing (ESL) Integrated Product Team-3 (IPT-3) is to improve the DON's ability to assess and procure enterprise solutions in the IT/cyberspace investment decision process. Reference (b) assigns the Marine Corps as the DON Lead Integrator for IPT-3. The Marine Corps assigned the specific responsibilities associated with the leadership ofipt-3 to the Marine Corps Systems Command, Information Systems and Infrastructure Directorate. The Marine Corps Software Enterprise License Management System (MCSELMS) Project Office within the Information Systems and Infrastructure Directorate will manage execution of this strategic sourcing initiative. Based on analysis of DON IT spending on software, the DON Chief Information Officer (CIO) identified several potential DON ELA opportunities; see enclosure (1). Where a DON ELA opportunity is supported by an approved Business Case Analysis (BCA), the DON CIO will request the MCSELMS project office determine the projected award date of the opportunity, update it as needed, and forward it to the DON CIO for review. The DON CIO will then post it to an access controlled website linked to http://www.doncio.navy.mil; instructions for access will be posted as well. The DON CIO has authority within the DON to decide upon requests for waivers to this policy. The DON CIO expects that waivers will be granted sparingly; for example, in cases of overseas contingency operations and in emergency situations, to ensure maximum cost savings are achieved and all other benefits associated with DON ELAs are realized. In cases of overseas contingency operations or emergency situations only, the commanding officer is authorized to approve the waiver; however, the waiver must be submitted to the respective DON Deputy CIO at the earliest opportunity. The DON Deputy CIO (Navy) and DON Deputy CIO (Marine Corps) are delegated authority by the DON CIO to grant waivers for their respective Services, and this authority may not be re-delegated, except as noted above. The DON CIO will continue to consider waiver requests for the Secretariat and will consider appeals for waiver requests denied by the DON Deputy CIO (Navy) and DON Deputy CIO (Marine Corps). Enclosure (2) provides the process for requesting waivers to DON ELAs via the DON variant of the DoD Information 2

Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING Technology Portfolio Repository (DITPR-DON). The DON CIO will monitor all ELA waiver requests via DITPR-DON. Points of contact for waivers are Mr. Don Reiter, donald.reiter@navy.mil, (703) 695 1972, for the DON CIO; Ms. Robin Thomas, robin.a.thomas@usmc.mil, (703) 693-3488, for the Marine Corps; and Ms. Andi St. John, andrea.stiohn@navy.mil, 571-256-8512, for the Navy. To support the proper management of DON ELAs, effective immediately the following is directed: MCSELMS, in coordination with Program Executive Office for Enterprise Information Systems (PEO EIS) and IPT-3, will: 1. Execute the overall DON ELA strategy and identity the business rules necessary for the award of each ELA to optimize usability by the Department. 2. Ensure the projected DON ELAs and timeline schedule located at the access controlled website linked to http://www.doncio.navy.mil are maintained in an up-to-date status for proper planning and execution purposes and forwarded to the DON CIO for review and posting. DON Deputy CIO (Navy), DON Deputy CIO (Marine Corps), PEOs, Command Information Officers, Program Managers, and Contracting Activities will ensure: 1. Processes are in place to comply with this policy. 2. The projected DON ELAs and timeline schedule, located at http://www.doncio.navy.mil. are reviewed prior to initiating/issuing procurement actions for software and related products. During the interim period, before a DON ELA is awarded, immediate mission needs may be met via other contract vehicles. However, the interim procurement plan should consider quantity, period of performance, and other factors to maximize use of DON ELAs as soon as practicable once they become available. 3. Each Service will use its current processes for budgeting and ordering until such time as a DON-wide common ordering tool has been implemented. 4. Products included in DON ELAs are procured only through DON ELAs and that the use of the software is consistent with the terms and conditions of the ELA. This includes commercially available software and software maintenance acquired: a. As part of a system or system upgrade. With regard to commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software embedded in weapons systems, ships' systems, aircraft, and similar platforms, a waiver will be submitted when the risk is determined to be unacceptable or for other compelling reasons. b. Under a service contract for Government use; c. Under a contract or agreement administered by another agency, such as an interagency agreement; or d. By a contractor that is authorized to order from a Government supply source pursuant to FAR 51.101. 5. Processes prescribed in references (c) and (d) are not duplicated, as they have been fully satisfied through the establishment of the DON ELAs. 3

Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING Comptrollers of Budget Submitting Offices will take appropriate measures to ensure: 1. That established command procedures are incorporated into fiscal processes. 2. Budget submissions use the High Interest Item (HII) codes, as directed by reference (e), located at http://www.doncio.navy.mil. The HII codes will inform senior leadership, MCSELMS, and IPT-3 of future ELA opportunities as well as assist in oversight of budgeting for and use of DON ELAs. 3. Activities using the Standard Accounting and Reporting System (STARS), either Field Level (FL) or Headquarters Claimant Modules (HCM), comply with reference (t). The DON Enterprise Architecture (EA) v3.0.000, via reference (g), mandates use of enterprise software agreements such as DON ELA, SmartBUY and DoD Enterprise Software Agreement (ESA) vehicles. All information technology programs, projects, and initiatives, including national security, systems, will be assessed annually via the DON EA functionality in DITPR-DON for their compliance with this mandate. It should be noted that this policy regarding DON ELAs does not replace or change the pre-existing requirements under reference (c), which take precedence and are the foundational basis for the development of the DON ELAs. The DoD Enterprise Software Initiative provides DoD-wide ESAs. Where a DoD ESA exists and a DON ELA has not been established for commercial software, the requirements in reference (c) must be followed. Questions regarding this policy should be directed as follows: the DON CIO Lead is Mr. Don Reiter, donald.reiter@navy.mil, (703) 695 1972; ASN (FM&C) POC is Ms. B. J. Dauro, bj.dauro@navy.mil, (703) 692-4840; ASN (RD&A) POC is Mr. Roger Yee, roger.yee@navy.mil, (703) 693-4019. Additional points of contact and associated information will be posted at http://www.doncio.navy.mil. U;~ Department of the Navy Chief Information Officer Distribution: CNO CMC ASN(M&RA) ASN (EI&E) DON/AA DUSN/DCMO DUSN (PPOI) ~r;~ Gladys J. Commons Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial Management & Comptroller) Sean J. Stackley Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development & Acquisition) 4

Subj: MANDATORY USE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENTERPRISE LICENSING Distribution: (continued) OPNAV (DNS, N2/N6) HQMC (C4, I&L) PEO (A) PEO (T) PEO (U&W) PEO Carriers PEO C4I PEOEIS PEOIWS PEO JSF PEOLS PEOLCS PEO Ships PEO Space PEO Subs DASN (C41 & Space) COMPACFLT COMUSFLTFORCOM COMUSNA VEUR USNA V AF CNIC USNA NAVWARCOL NAVPGSCOL COMUSNA VCENT COMFLTCYBERCOM COMNA VAIRSYSCOM COMNA VSEASYSCOM COMNA VSUPSYSCOM COMUSNAVSO COMNA VFACENGCOM COMNA VSPECWARCOM COMSPA WARSYSCOM DIRSSP BUPERS COMNAVDIST ONI FLDSUPPACT COMOPTEVFOR NAVIOCOM COMMARCORSYSCOM MARFORCYBER 5

Proposed List of Department of the Navy Enterprise Licensing Agreement (DON ELA) Opportunities Microsoft Cisco Oracle VMware NetApp EMC IBM HP Adobe Symantec Xerox Autodesk ActiveIdentity Bel Arc Axway Enclosure (1)

DON Enterprise Licensing Agreement (ELA) Waiver Request Process Ref: (a) Under Secretary of the Navy Memorandum of December 3, 2010, Subj: Department of the Navy (DON) Information Technology (IT) /Cyberspace Efficiency Initiatives and Realignment (b) Department ofthe Navy (DON) Chieflnformation Officer (CIO) Memorandum of July 19,2011, Subj: Department of the Navy Information Technology Expenditure Approval Authorities (ITEAA) All ELA waiver requests shall be submitted via DoD Information Technology Portfolio Repository (DITPR-DON) in accordance with procedures as set forth below. (The requesting organization must ensure that an Information Technology Expenditure Approval Authorities (ITEAA) authorization to purchase the software has been received prior to requesting this waiver in accordance with references (a) and (b)). 1. The following process shall be followed for ELA waivers required for software, hardware, or related services that are part of a system/program registered in DITPR DON. a. Program Managers complete the DON Enterprise Architecture (DON EA) compliance process in DITPR-DON, using the "Other" trigger event, and specify in the comment section that this is a waiver request for purchase of software, hardware, or related services outside of a DON ELA. Assert "yes" to the ELA applicability question (Have a requirement for software available via a DON ELA). Assert "no" to the compliance question (Plan to procure software available via a DON ELA?). Once the submit button at the bottom ofthe page has been selected, an ELA waiver request tab will be automatically generated. The ELA waiver request tab should be completed in accordance with the information specified below in Table 1. b. Once the ELA waiver request has been submitted, the appropriate stakeholders will review and provide a recommendation, with final approval authority being DON Deputy CIO (Navy), DON Deputy CIO (Marine Corps), or DON CIO for Secretariat waiver requests. If the waiver request is urgent, it is recommended that the Program Manager notify the applicable Echelon II Command Information Office (Navy) or Functional Area Manager (F AM) (USMC) via email. c. The Program Manager will be notified of the final adjudication of the waiver request by the final approval authority via email within 10 working days, assuming all requested information was provided in the request. 2. The following process shall be followed for ELA waivers required for software, hardware, or related services that are not part of a system/program registered in DITPR-DON. a. Upon notification of an ELA waiver requirement, the Navy Echelon II Command Information Officer (10), the Marine Corp Enterprise Services (ES) Functional Area Manager (FAM), or DON/AA will register an initiative in DITPR-DON, Enclosure (2)

which will be used as the mechanism for requesting the required ELA waiver. For example, the initiative might be titled "(Command X)-wide purchase of (Software Product X)." b. Once the initiative is registered in DITPR-DON, the DON EA Tab will be used to submit the waiver request, selecting "Other" triggering event. The triggering event comment section will include a statement that this is a waiver request for purchase of software, hardware, or related services outside of an ELA. c. The Echelon II Command Information Officer or Marine Corps ES F AM will: Assert "yes" to the ELA applicability question (Have a requirement for software available via a DON ELA). Assert "no" to the compliance question (Plan to procure software available via a DON ELA). Once the submit button at the bottom of the page has been selected, an ELA waiver request tab will be automatically generated. The ELA waiver request tab should be completed in accordance with the information specified below in Table 1. Note: It is likely that all remaining DON EA questions within DITPR- DON, with the exception of the ones associated with the ELA artifact, should be answered as "no" or "n/a". d. Once the ELA waiver request has been submitted, the appropriate stakeholders will review and provide a recommendation, with final approval authority being the appropriate DON Deputy CIO (Navy), DON Deputy CIO (Marine Corps), or the DON CIO for Secretariat waiver requests. If the waiver request is urgent, it is recommended that the Echelon II Command 10 (Navy), F AM (USMC), or DONI AA communicate the ELA waiver request via email. e. The Navy Echelon II Command 10, the Marine Corp ES FAM, or DON/AA will be notified of the final adjudication of the waiver request by the approval authority via email within 10 working days, assuming all requested information was provided in the request. Enclosure (2)

Table 1. Information Required for Submitting DON ELA Waiver Request in DITPR-DON (All Information must be provided) Information Software (publisher, name, and version) Operational requirement for the software Statement that "The organization requesting the waiver understands that contract options will be assessed on an annual basis and approval of this request will ensure near-term solution to purchasing requirements while providing the means to transition to the DON ELA as quicldy as practicable." Number of seats, licenses, or processors Software purchase price (by product) Software maintenance and support costs Cost if purchased through DON ELA (by product, separately include maintenance and support costs) Cost savings or over-expenditure realized by using method other than DON ELA Other compelling reasons why use of DON ELA will not satisfy requirements (include supporting documentation) Contracting Activity/Office Altemative Contract Vehicle(s) Targeted for Use Duration of requested waiver DITPR-DON Location MAP Tab & Reason for Waiver Request in ELA Waiver Tab or DOC Tab (as appropriate) or DOC Tab (as appropriate) Planned Compliance Date in ELA Waiver Tab Enclosure (2)