External examiner policy and procedures



Similar documents
Validation, Monitoring & Review

Section 15 Postgraduate Research Degree Regulations

Institute of Technology Tallaght. Marks and Standards for Assessment on Taught Programmes of Learning for which Delegated Authority has been granted

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON EXTERNAL EXAMINING (TAUGHT PROVISION)

Quality Handbook. Part B: Assuring and Enhancing Quality. Section 11: Research degrees. Section11. Nottingham Trent University

Programme validation report. Validation Report BN525. Master of Business. (90 ECTS credits leading to NFQ Level 9 Award)

Programme Specification for the MSc Surgical Technology

GUIDELINES FOR A CODE OF PRACTICE FOR MASTERS BY RESEARCH. Compiled by: The Interfaculty Graduate Studies Board

Procedures for validation and accreditation

Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

University Centre at Blackburn College. Abbreviated Programme Specification Containing Both Core + Supplementary Information

UCD Registry Student Desk & Records. Tierney Building University College Dublin Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Policies & procedures for the admission of students to post-graduate degrees

How To Improve The Quality Of Education In The Uk

Programme Specification for the Master of Public Health (MPH)

PROCEDURES FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF READERS

Academic Program Review Handbook

BY-LAW FOR THE AWARD OF THE HONOURS DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN QUANTITY SURVEYING/ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES

Quality Assurance Procedures Manual

The roles of Graduate Studies Committees and the operation of progress reviews for research students

Programme Review. Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Computing in Information Security and Digital Forensics BN120. Department of Informatics

Programme Specification: MSc Electronic Commerce

Handbook of Academic Regulations and Procedures

Programme Specification

Dublin Business School

COURSE OR HONOURS SUBJECT TITLE: BSc Hons Information Technologies with/without DPP/DPP(I)/DIAS with CertHE and AB exit awards (FT)

Guidance by the General Board on the arrangements for External Examiners

MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Overview. Fee: 10,000 euros (International Students Non EU) Awarding Body:

The current ( ) Marketing Ph.D. Committee consists of Greg M. Allenby (Committee Chair), Xiaoyan Deng, Nino Hardt, and Rebecca Walker Reczek.

Access: Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Information Technology

University of Roehampton. Quality Assurance of School Partnership Training & Delivery

GUIDANCE NOTES ON UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

Regulations of the Graduate School of Communication Science of the Department 06 of the Westfälische Wilhelms University Muenster

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications

REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREES OF MPHIL AND PHD. These regulations are approved by Senate. They were most recently updated in July 2014.

RULES ON DOCTORAL STUDIES AT THE REYKJAVÍK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. Article 1 Doctoral studies (Ph.D.)

Provisions relating to Doctorate Degree PREAMBLE. 17. The University will award the following Doctorate Degrees:

CHAPTER 1 REGULATIONS FOR MATRICULATION. In order to matriculate, a student must have fulfilled the requirements for admission.

UNIVERSITY OF READING

SQT Training Ltd. Programmatic Review. Report of Peer Review Group. October 2011

Programme Specification for the MSc in Computing Science

REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES AND MASTERS DEGREES BY RESEARCH

Regulatory Framework for Undergraduate Awards: Two Year Degrees (Amendments since 2014/15 shown in bold and underlined)

ACADEMIC REGULATIONS for Postgraduate Research Degrees

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Electronic Security and Digital Forensics

ACADEMIC AWARD REGULATIONS Framework and Regulations for Professional Doctorates. Approval for this regulation given by :

Policy and Framework for Structured PhD Programmes. Adopted by Academic Council on 16 th February 2011

Programme Specification for the Master of Public Health (MPH)

How To Pass An Exam In Africa

LIT SAMPLE DIPLOMA SUPPLEMENT LIMERICK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA LUIMNIGH

2. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

GUIDANCE FOR BOARDS OF EXAMINERS IN PARTNER COLLEGES. Degrees, Top-up Degrees and Foundation Degrees

BOARD FOR GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH

Quality Assurance and Enhancement Documentation. 1.0 Introduction. 2.0 Standard Format. 3.0 Programme Approval Form. 4.0 Validation Documentation

1. Awarding Institution: Imperial College London. 2. Teaching Institution: Imperial College London

MBA in Construction and Real Estate. Assessment, progression and award regulations

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

2.2 Assessors shall not be members of Boards or Joint Boards of Examiners and shall not be entitled unless invited to attend their meetings.

Post-graduate Programmes in Construction. Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors (RICS), Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

Programme Specification for the MSc in Computing (<Specialism>)

REGULATIONS FOR RESEARCH DEGREE PROGRAMMES. MPhil PhD PhD by Published Work Professional Doctorates Higher Doctorates

Royal Institution Chartered Surveyors, Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

Guidance for drafting a contextual document Rationale, aims and market for the proposal Note Standards - course outcomes and level

POLICY Personal Academic Tutoring Policy

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Electronic Security and Digital Forensics

Starting Guide for PhD

Master of Business Administration (Logistics and Supply Chain Management)

THE TEACHING COUNCIL [REGISTRATION] REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 31 OF PART 3 OF THE TEACHING COUNCIL ACTS, 2001 TO 2006 ( THE ACT )

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (RESEARCH), THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (PROFESSIONAL) AND THE MASTERS DEGREE (RESEARCH)

Joint PhD Programs Guidelines

UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

ENROLMENT POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ADMISSION

University of Tampere Regulations on Degrees

National Institute of Science Education and Research Institute of Physics Campus, Bhubaneswar

Mechanical Engineering Program. Policies and Procedures

DAQ Guide 9 December A Good Practice Guide to Accreditation of Prior Achievement (APA)

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Computer and Network Security

Programme Specification for the MSc in Metals and Energy Finance

Programme Specification for Computer Systems Engineering (Software Systems) MSc

Regulations for the award of Taught Master s Degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates

STUDENT INFORMATION AND ADMISSIONS HANDBOOK

Lecturer Teaching and Research - Socio-Cultural Studies. Dean of School / Director of Learning and Teaching

This post is intended to make a major contribution to the teaching, research and/or income-generating activity of the Faculty.

Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) Regulations School of Education (Proposed)

Course of Examination for Doctoral Studies Version for Readers 1

Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements

Transcription:

External examiner policy and procedures External examiner policy and procedures 3AS09 File Location: Current Revision: 04 Approved by: Academic Council 19 April 2013 Document Owner: Registrar 3AS09.04 Document Level: 3 External examiner policy and procedures Revision history Revision Date Revision description DCRT# Originator 01 01 September 03 Conversion of OP162 and updating of fees for 2003-2004 Registrar 02 15 March 2005 Update for 2004-2005 Registrar 03 25 May 2006 Reference to 3AS15 and general update Registrar 04 19 April 2013 Update to reflect QQI (formerly HETAC) guidelines on external examiners IR working group & QA Officer 3AS09 Page 1 of 5 8 April 2013

External examiner policy and procedures Purpose The purpose of this document is to record Institute policy and procedures with regard to the nomination, appointment, duties and responsibilities of external examiners. Scope This document is relevant to all academic staff, students, school administrators and external examiners appointed to the Institute. Appendices Appendix A 4FAS09 External examiner nomination form Appendix B 4FAS17 External examiner acceptance form Appendix C 4FAS08 External examiner report template Appendix D Induction and training resources for extern examiners Reference 3AS02 3AS03 3AS04 3AS05 3AS06 3AS15 4FAS07 Examination paper authoring Continuous assessment policy Examinations student information Examination regulations Academic programme assessment policy and procedure Operating procedures for examination boards Internal or external examiners report on thesis for degree of Masters or Doctor of Philosophy by research HETAC (now QQI) Effective Practice Guidelines for External Examining. March 2010 HETAC (now QQI) Assessment and Standards. December 2009 3CD07 Operational details for registered postgraduate students (Postgraduate student handbook) 3AS09 Page 2 of 5 8 April 2013

External examiner policy and procedures External examiner An external examiner is an independent expert who is a member of the broader community of practice within the programme s field of learning and whose accomplishments attest to his/her likelihood of having the authority necessary to fulfil the responsibilities of the role. 1 External examining is a specific learner assessment quality assurance mechanism employed by the Institute to support public confidence. The external examiners function may be carried out by an individual or a team of examiners where it is deemed appropriate given the needs of the programme(s). Qualities and competencies It is expected that external examiners shall be: Independent experts with academic and/or professional experience and authority necessary to objectively judge the appropriateness and compliance of programme standards with the National Framework of Qualifications (NFQ), National standards, and International standards. Drawn from the higher education community or communities of practice from business, industry and the professional environment. Suitably qualified in the appropriate discipline with a minimum qualification of an award at or above the level being examined. For all undergraduate programmes, that would generally be an honours degree or equivalent having both current and relevant experience in the areas of industry, education or research. For postgraduate degrees, that would be a level 9 or 10 award, as appropriate for the examination. Where the needs of the programme require specialised skills a person or persons possessing a range of appropriate skills may be appointed. Duties and responsibilities The principal duty of external examiners is to ensure that the Institute is compliant with National and International standards and the NFQ in its assessment of learners, thus ensuring public confidence in the academic qualifications of the Institute. The main duties and responsibilities of the external examiner(s) are: Reviewing the appropriateness of the minimum intended programme learning outcomes and other programme objectives (see http://courses.itb.ie/ ). Reviewing the appropriateness of the programme and module assessment strategies and assessment procedures. 1 Effective practice guideline for external examining HETAC March 2010 3AS09 Page 3 of 5 8 April 2013

External examiner policy and procedures Compare and contrast both the minimum intended programme learning outcomes and the actual attainment of learners with the relevant awards standards, with the National Framework of Qualifications, and with corresponding data from other programmes in the same discipline in other higher education institutions in Ireland and abroad. Examine the actual attainment of learners (actual programme learning outcomes). Upholding appropriate standards with regard to pass, merit and distinction/honours grading. Reviewing a representative sample of assessment tasks and other material presented for assessment including examination scripts, projects, and other key assessment tasks. o Samples should include sufficient material to enable the external examiner to form a judgement of the appropriateness of the marking at all levels of classification. Reviewing drafts of all examination papers after the internal review process is completed, having the right to make suggestions as to deletions, additions or amendments as appropriate. The Head of School/Department shall ensure that such material is provided to the external examiner in good time. o It is the primary responsibility of internal examiners to identify typographical, grammar and other procedural issues in examination papers. Visiting the Institute at least once in each academic year normally at the time of determination of final results in Summer. During a visit the external examiner s duties include: o o o o o Reviewing borderline cases, prior to and during examination board meetings. Attending appropriate examination board meeting(s). For operating procedures at examination board meetings see the Institute policy document 3AS15. Participating in the determination of final marks and results of each candidate at the examination board meeting. Determining whether or not the applied procedures for assessment are valid, reliable, fair and consistent. Signing the relevant broadsheet of results confirming their participation as a member of the examination board. Report findings and recommendations by means of a written report, see Appendix C (4FAS08), for each examination for which they are involved returning same to the Registrar by the following October 15th for each academic year. Acknowledging receipt of examination material received from the Institute and ensuring that the integrity of the examinations process is maintained Reviewing annually, the examination marks and standards document, see Institute policy document 3AS06, which sets out the guidelines for the assessment of learners. In addition to submitting yearly reports on the examinations process the external examiner may, on completion of his/her term of office, submit a general report to the Registrar or nominee on his/her opinion of the standards of the programme/subject area and student performance. Proposals for Extern Examiners 3AS09 Page 4 of 5 8 April 2013

External examiner policy and procedures Suggestions of extern examiners should be communicated using the nomination form, see Appendix A (4FAS09). This is to be completed by the relevant Head of School/Department and forwarded to the Registrar before September 25th of the academic year of initial appointment. Due cognisance of the desirability of gender balance and complementary skills to other current and previous examiners, should be taken when nominating external examiners. Appointment External examiners are appointed by the Registrar and should not normally exceed more than one appointment period (3 years) and never more than two consecutive appointment periods. External examiners who have served for two appointment periods or more should not be considered for re-nomination until a minimum of three years has elapsed. An acceptance form, must be completed by the external examiner and returned with a detailed curriculum vitae to the Registrar (see Appendix B; 4FAS17). Appropriate induction and training resources for extern examiners are listed in Appendix D. External examiners for postgraduate students Procedures for appointment and engagement of extern examiners for individual postgraduate programmes by research are covered in institute policy Operational details for registered postgraduate students (Postgraduate student handbook) (3CD07). Reporting arrangements In the case of external examiner reports for postgraduate theses, these reports are unique to that programme and are used as part of the degree awarding process. They are not circulated further. In the case of extern examiner reports for undergraduate programmes, the following applies: The Registrar shall provide a copy of the external examiners report to the relevant Head of School. The Head of School should ensure that the reports are distributed to each Head of Department and each of the relevant course board co-ordinators. The course board will consider reports as appropriate and report accordingly through minutes of course board meetings. 3AS09 Page 5 of 5 8 April 2013

Appendix A External examiner nomination form (4FAS09) Institute of Technology Blanchardstown The purpose of this form is to suggest nominations of new external examiners for the present (and subsequent) academic years. Completed forms are to be forwarded by the Head of School to the Registrar. Name of nominee Academic/professional qualifications Areas of specialisation : Programmes / subject area : Current post description: Contact address: Contact phone number: E-mail address: Summary of relevant experience Nominated by: Date of nomination: Nomination supported: Yes / No Signed: Date:

Appendix B External examiner acceptance form (4FAS17) Institute of Technology Blanchardstown Salutation Name Academic/professional qualification(s) Job title Work address Home address Phone Fax E-mail Mobile number Please indicate which address should be used for correspondence Work Home I agree to accept the appointment of external examiner at the Institute of Technology Blanchardstown in accordance with the procedures duties and responsibilities laid down in this document. I understand that the duration of appointment will be from October to September I note that this period may be extended by one term (3 years) by mutual consent. An honorarium is paid annually to external examiners as a gesture to acknowledge the importance and effort involved in acting as an external examiner. Payments are based on an annual appointment fee and a programme fee per year of course examined or if subject specific the number of subjects examined. Travel and subsistence costs incurred by external examiners will be reimbursed at local government rates on receipt of vouched claims. Signature. Date:.. Please return this form to The Registrar, Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, Blanchardstown Road North, Dublin 15. Phone (01)8851040. Fax: (01)8851001. E-mail diarmuid.ocallaghan@itb.ie

Appendix C External examiner report (4FAS08) Institute of Technology Blanchardstown This form is to be completed by appointed external examiners of the Institute. It is part of the quality assurance procedures of the Institute and is required as part of approved Academic Council procedures. The form should be returned to the Registrar, Institute of Technology Blanchardstown, before 15 th October of the following academic year which the examination being reported on took place. Thank you. Name of external examiner Academic year Programmes examined Programme code / title NFQ level Modules examined (Subject specific examiners) e.g. Languages, IT subjects within business programmes etc. NFQ level Module code Module title 3AS09 Page - 8 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Examinations considered as part of this report Semester 1 Semester 2 Autumn repeats Evidence considered Were you provided with adequate information with regard to Institute regulations, the programme, methods of assessment and duties and responsibilities of external examiners? Yes No N/A If no please comment: Please indicate any visits, meetings including exam boards and interviews with learners and academic staff. Did you receive the examination papers, marking schemes and worked solutions in reasonable time? Yes No N/A If no please comment: 3AS09 Page - 9 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

3AS09 Page - 10 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Learning outcomes Please consider and comment as appropriate on the educational objectives including their explicitness, appropriateness and consistency standards with the relevant awards standards and the National Framework of Qualifications. Attainment of learners Please consider and comment as appropriate on your perception of the actual attainment of learners (knowledge, skill and competence) taking the following into consideration: The Institute s assessment tasks (e.g. assessment strategies, examination papers, marking schemes etc.) Representative samples of learner responses to assessment tasks (e.g. examination scripts, coursework etc.) 3AS09 Page - 11 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Assessment procedures Please consider and comment as appropriate on your perception of the following: Examination paper structure Is the structure, organisation and marking of the examination, including level and range of questions set appropriate? Range of assessment What extent did the examination and other assessments cover the course material and module stated aims and objectives? Examination process Are the assessment processes rigorous? Do they ensure equity of treatment for students? Have they been fairly conducted within Institutional regulations? 3AS09 Page - 12 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

3AS09 Page - 13 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Learner performance Are the standards of student performance appropriate? Comparability of standards Are the standards and learner achievement comparable with peers in other Higher Education Institutes, nationally and internationally? Examination board meeting Please indicate date and time of examination board(s) attended. Please indicate did not attend if appropriate. Was the examination board meeting conducted in a professional manner with evidence of fairness and consistency for learners? 3AS09 Page - 14 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Aspects of the programme Please consider and comment as appropriate on your perception of any aspect(s) of the programme to be commended. Please consider and comment as appropriate on your perception of any aspect(s) of the programme that require attention. Progress on previous reports Evidence of response to feedback provided? Conclusions and recommendations Signature of external examiner 3AS09 Page - 15 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Date 3AS09 Page - 16 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Checklist to be considered by external examiners when completing 4FAS08 Resources and support The quality of the briefing provided by the Institute The arrangements for your involvement in the assessment process The adequacy of assistance provided to enable you to fulfil your role Extern examining arrangements The adequacy of the physical arrangements for performance of duties The fairness of the examination process The effectiveness of the assessment strategy in the modules you have examined (balance between coursework and examinations and the student workload) The coverage of the syllabus and achievement of learning outcomes across programmes examined In project based modules the appropriateness of the topics and the standard and consistency of marking across projects The quality of examination papers Academic standard The standard attained by students in relation to comparable courses elsewhere The standard attained by students compared with that of previous years The standard of students project work Overall comments on the course The curriculum design and structure The appropriateness and relevance of the syllabus and overall programme 3AS09 Page - 17 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006

Appendix D: Induction and training resources for extern examiners. 3AS02 3AS03 3AS04 3AS05 3AS06 3AS15 4FAS07 HETAC (now QQI) HETAC (now QQI) 3CD07 HETAC (now QQI) Examination paper authoring Continuous assessment policy Examinations student information Examination regulations Academic programme assessment policy and procedure Operating procedures for examination boards Internal or external examiners report on thesis for degree of Masters or Doctor of Philosophy by research Effective Practice Guidelines for External Examining. March 2010 http://www.hetac.ie/docs/external%20examing%20new.pdf Assessment and Standards. December 2009 http://www.hetac.ie/docs/fina%20english%20assessment%20and%20standards%202009.pdf Operational details for registered postgraduate students (Postgraduate student handbook) http://www.reviewertraining.ie/ //end 3AS09 Page - 18 - of 18 03, 2 March 2006