Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari Mohammad Hassanzadeh Nowadays, it is accepted that development in the modern science is directly related to achieving success in science. The scientists should be able to develop, understand and use the modern scientific methods in their researches. Since, science is developing fast; the scientists should share their scientific knowledge with individuals who attempt to update frequently their information. Studying factors that affect knowledge sharing scientists behavior should be considered in knowledge era. Therefore, the focus of this paper centers on the behavior of sharing scientist s acquired knowledge with other scientists in scientific collaboration and co-authorship. Theory of planned behavior (TPB) is adopted and explained the factors of Attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control to predict behavior of scientists. This paper presents sets of critical factors such as individual, organizational and technological that is believed to affect on knowledge sharing behaviors. Overall, the results of this study advance prior research in the area of knowledge sharing by shedding light on the determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors, and develop the better understanding of knowledge sharing for the scientists who attempt improve their knowledge in scientific collaboration in the future. Keywords: scientists, scientific knowledge, knowledge sharing behavior, TPB, scientific collaboration Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari Department of library and information science Tonekabon branch Islamic Azad University Tonekabon Iran R.ghorbani.b@gmail.com Mohammad Hassanzadeh Tarbiat Modares University Tehran Iran hasanzadeh@modares.ac.ir 1. Introduction In recent years, science production has multiplied in many countries; this indicates the active cooperation in the field of science and knowledge which have gained Originally presented at the 7th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics (WIS) and 12th COLLNET Meeting, September 20 23, 2011, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey. Published Online First : 15 December 2012 http://www.tarupublications.com/journals/cjsim/cjsim.htm COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 1

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge significant advancements through effective communication in scientific activities. Each scientific activity requires to publish and share scientific knowledge and information in national and international levels (Hart[1]). There s no doubt without sharing, the mission of science production means the production of scientific knowledge- will not be done properly; on the other hand, research co-operations have significant effect on increasing the rate of scientific productions and their citations. With the rapid growth of science and technology, and considering the fact that an individual usually can t research in all fields of science, it s much better the scientists share their scientific views and ideas and go forward along with modern sciences to achieve new aspects of researching in different fields, and even inter-disciplinary fields (Hassanzadeh, Baghaei and Noroozi Chakoli[2]). Hence, to increase the scientific cooperations and co-authorship in the international level, in spite of acquiring and applying scientific knowledge, focusing on knowledge sharing and factors effect on it, are clearly observed among scientists. Sharing their scientific knowledge scientists show behaviors which reveal the level of their interest in either others request for knowledge or others need for their own knowledge. So, it seems to be essential to study the issue of scientific knowledge sharing and identify the factors influencing the behavior of scientific knowledge sharing. 2. Knowledge In current era, knowledge is the driving force behind the social and economical development so that in the past decade, it has been increasingly highlighted as one of the important competitive elements in the organizations (Marouf[3]). Knowledge plays a significant role in technological and scientific development. Knowledge is a combination of background information, values and experiences which helps to evaluate and consolidate scientists new information and experiences. Knowledge exists not only in scientific documents but also in people s minds and is exhibited through their actions and behaviors (Alawi, Marzooqi and Mohammad[4]). If experts beliefs, ideas, experiences and background information provide the basis for their research and scientific expansions, people s intellectual assets could be introduced as scientific knowledge. In many researches, it was shown that the articles produced by scientists scientific cooperation have better quality and more citations (Hollis[5]; Frenkel, Hölzl, Vor [6]). In fact, the dynamics of new economy requires scientists who can create new knowledge and by sharing it, help the acquisition of collective knowledge (Babalhavaeji, Jafarzadeh Kermani[7]). Therefore, one can understand the importance of scientific knowledge among scientists. 3. Knowledge sharing Knowledge sharing is a process through which a scientist s knowledge is transferred to another scientist in an understandable, absorbable and applicable form (Lin [8]). According to Christensen, the goal of knowledge sharing is to create new knowledge by combining 2 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh existing knowledge in new knowledge or to exploit the existing knowledge in a better way (Antonova, Csepregi, J.R [9]). Bock and Kim [10] believe that knowledge sharing occurs when scientists, besides being interested in sharing their knowledge, seek learning from each others knowledge and experience. Knowledge sharing is the social interaction culture which includes the exchange of knowledge, employees experience and skills all over the organization (Lin, [11]). Generally, Knowledge sharing is a cooperative process which includes the distribution of information, ideas and skills among scientists. 4. Knowledge sharing behavior Knowledge sharing may be defined as a behavior in which one offers his knowledge and experiences voluntarily to others. Since the principles of knowledge management has been proposed, researchers tried to review the variants related to the scientific knowledge sharing behavior. According to the researches, several factors including attitudes, intentions, subjective norms affect on knowledge sharing) Chatzoglu and Vraimaiki [12]). Considering the fact that behavior, is a response to a certain stimulus (Karimi [13]), in the context of knowledge sharing, knowledge sharing behavior could be defined as an scientists response to others request or others need for knowledge. Beliefs, views, goals and behavior of knowledge source and knowledge receiver will have significant impact on the effectiveness of knowledge sharing strategies (Lichtenstein and Hunter [14]). One can state that the success of knowledge sharing is related to behavioral elements (Sohail, Daud [15]). 5. Theory of Planned Behavior Researchers frequently ask about the factors determine scientific knowledge sharing behavior and if there s a general theoretical framework to predict such behavior? (Zhikun, Fungfai [16]). Studies in the field of knowledge sharing show that despite researchers focused on investigating the goals of knowledge sharing among people, they didn t pay enough attention to knowledge sharing behavior (Chennamaneni [17]). Therefore, in the field of knowledge sharing, it s important to pay attention to the behavior of scientists and factors affect it- including attitude, intention, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. As knowledge sharing is an intentional behavior, we introduce Theory of planned behavior model proposed by Fishbein and Ajzen [18] in 1975 in order to focus on knowledge sharing behavior ) Gagné [19]). According to Sheeran and Orbell [20], this theory refers to a person s intention in performing positive and negative behavior towards knowledge sharing (Tohidinia, Mosakhani [21]). Besides, attitude towards behavior, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control are other elements which affect the element of intention as one of key factors of behavior (Ajzen [22]). Each one is explained below: 6. Attitude Attitude is an individual s positive or negative evaluation of self-performance of a particular behavior (Fishbein and Ajzen[18]). Knowledge is significantly influenced by COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 3

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge Figure 1 A conceptual model of the Theory of planned behavior people s attitude towards learning, sharing and storage of knowledge. Besides, its important role in transferring knowledge, people s attitude can also prevent the creation and sharing the knowledge among them (Shiue, Chang, Yang, Chen [23]). Because many people consider knowledge as power and believe sharing it will harm them (Szulanski [24]; Dunford [25]; Grandori, Kogut [26]). Personal attitude, through Interpretation processes, is probably accompanies by a collection of predetermined behaviors which can have pleasant or unpleasant effects on knowledge acquisition and knowledge transfer processes (Vithessonthi [27]). In knowledge sharing, attitudes like no knowledge is created or doubts about the authenticity of source, can possibly cause receiver s disinclination to receive knowledge. Attitude could be different in various conditions and environments. In a research, Dong, Liem and Grossman [28] found that two factors of self-worth and social trust influence the attitude towards knowledge sharing behavior. Jarvenpaa and Staples believe that social-psychological factors like self-worth affect people s attitude towards sharing information in organizational environment (Julibert [29]). A study by Bock, Kim, Zmud and Lee [30] found that people s positive attitude towards knowledge sharing affect their intention to share knowledge. According to Shin, Ramayah and Jahani[31], negative attitude towards knowledge sharing leads to selfishness and keeping scientific knowledge inside the institutions. Babalhavaeji and Jafarzadeh kermani [7]) found in a research that people s attitude has a significant effect on their behavior intentions. Therefore, according to this model, we can argue that scientists attitudes effect on their personal intentions and it s expected that scientists with positive attitudes towards scientific knowledge sharing have stronger intentions for sharing the scientific knowledge with others (and vice versa). 7. Subjective norm Subjective norms refer to the external stimuli that directly or indirectly affect a person s intention to share the knowledge (Bock, et al., [30]). According to this model subjec- 4 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh tive norms are a combination of expectations of people towards others behavior (Dong, etc [28]). According to Fishbein and Ajzen[18], subjective norms are the factors that cause most people believe the individuals have expected a special behavior from them. Chang believes that Subjective norm (Lu, Hsiao [32]). Cheung believes that subjective norm is such as social influences positively affected an individuals behavior (Li, Mizerski, Lee, Liu [33]). Generally it can be argued that subjective norm, in the environment of knowledge sharing, is the person s expectation towards others for offering their experiences and scientific knowledge. Based on Theory of planned behavior, the more subjective norms towards knowledge sharing expect the stronger intention of person towards sharing knowledge (and vice versa) (Teh, Yong, Chong, Yew [34]). Chatzoglu and Vraimaiki [12] found that subjective norm and employees attitude towards knowledge sharing have definitely positive effect on their intention for knowledge sharing. Lu and Hsaio [32] showed that subjective norms effects people s intention indirectly. According to this model, if scientists subjective norms are influenced by their attitude and perceived behavioral control, they will strengthen personal intentions and scientists behavior of scientific knowledge-sharing. 8. Perceived behavioral control According to Ajzen [22], perceived behavioral control is individual s perception of easy or difficult performing a particular behavior. This factor is accompanied by control elements which can affect on easy or difficult performance of a behavior (Liao, Chen, Yen [35], Li, et al., [33]. Based on theory of planned behavior, perceived behavioral control is a person control on his behavior and it usually has direct effect on the behavior (Fielding, McDonald, and Louis [36]. Control factors could be divided to two components of internal and external; while internal control deals with self-efficacy and personal scientific knowledge, and external control is related to the environment (Liao, et al., [35]). Emphasizing on the issue of knowledge-sharing behavior, one can argue that perceived behavioral control refers to a control that scientists reveal when a certain behavior occurs during scientific knowledge sharing. In fact, this control depends on scientist s perception of their capability in performing specific behavior towards others and the scientists have a control on their behaviors according to current conditions and their recognition of people. If scientists have better control on their own behavior in scientific knowledge sharing, their knowledge sharing behavior will be more active. 9. Intention The success of knowledge management is dependent to a considerable extent on people s intention to share scientific knowledge (Chatzoglu and Vraimaiki [12]). Knowledge sharing requires people s intention for sharing their personal knowledge (Gupta, Govindarajan [37]). A few researches have been performed about the factors affecting the scientists intention for knowledge sharing (Cyr, Choo [38]). According to Davenport and Prusak, time, energy and knowledge of people are limited and they will not COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 5

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge have the intention to share scientific knowledge if there is no benefit to them (Hung, Durcikova, Lai, [39]). Sometimes people may have the intention to share knowledge but lack of facilities and proper organizational, cultural and economical infrastructures prevent them from knowledge sharing. Researches by Bock and Kim [10]; Bock et al., [30]; Aulawi, Sudirman, Suryadi, Govindaraju [40] showed that if the conditions for knowledge sharing are provided, the intention for knowledge sharing is created and people s attitude towards knowledge sharing strengthened. According to Kankanhalli, Tan and Wei [41], people s intentions are rooted in their attitude towards knowledge sharing; so we expect scientists to have positive attitude towards knowledge sharing if they have the intention to do so (Gao, Sheng [42]). According to this theory, people s intention to share their knowledge leads to increase scientific knowledge sharing behavior in scientists. According to the Theory of planned behavior, one can expect that the elements of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control increase the intention of scientists for scientific knowledge sharing, which in turn will lead them to engage more actively in scientific knowledge sharing and increase their scientific cooperation and involvement in the international level. In addition, there are some factors that if they are provided, they will facilitate the path for better scientific knowledge sharing by scientists The better conditions for knowledge sharing, the more active behavior of scientists will show in it. In fact, the effectiveness of knowledge sharing is dependent on the capacity for receiving the knowledge and scientists ability for knowledge sharing (Soller [43]). Knowledge sharing takes place under certain conditions and factors. According to studies and researches in the field of knowledge sharing behavior, the factors influencing it are reviewed in three personal, organizational and technological categories. 10. Individual factors Self-satisfaction, trust, motivation and communication skills are some personal factors to effect on knowledge sharing. Enjoyment to help others comes from altruism feeling (Lin [11]). Experimental researches by Kankanhalli, et al., [41] indicate that there s a positive relations between altruism feeling and knowledge sharing (Hung, etc., [39]). Trust is one of important elements in knowledge sharing behavior (Chow, Chan [44]). van den Hooff and Leeuw van Weenen [45] believe the more trust among the employees lead to the higher levels of knowledge sharing. If experts don t trust the knowledge they receive, they will not use it properly. Motivation is another factor which has been highlighted significantly in researches regarding knowledge sharing (Hendriks, Sousa [46]; Siemsen, Roth, Balasubramanian [47]; Swift, Balkin, Matusik [48]). So, one of the most priorities proposed by knowledge management is creating the motivation for sharing knowledge amongst people. In fact, personal motivation could be an incentive element for scientists to offer their scientific knowledge to each other. On the other hand, better communication skills in scientists provide the situation for easier creation, acquisition and sharing scientific knowledge among them and they 6 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh can achieve co-authorship and scientific productions by active cooperation and partnership. They may have information and knowledge about a certain field but won t be able to transfer their scientific knowledge to others efficiently due to lack of enough communication skills. The factors such as: lack of enough time to identify scientists who need certain knowledge, being unaware if one s scientific knowledge is useful for others, differences in level of people s experiences in knowledge sharing may become personal barriers in scientific knowledge sharing; if such factors are dealt with and resolved properly, we can expect the increase of scientists cooperation and their scientific knowledge-sharing. 11. Technological factors Information technology is used in broad level in order to heighten the level of cooperation between people and groups (Samarah [49]). Information technology has the potential of acquisition, storage, processing, retrieving and transferring the knowledge (Reychav, Weisberg [50]) and enables scientists, geographically close or far from each other, to share their knowledge simultaneously or separately. There are different tools for knowledge sharing which let the scientists to increase their mutual cooperation and scientific productions. These tools give speed to experts communications in scientific knowledge sharing. Ideal expectations of scientists from information technology and scientists intention to use information technology systems and also training them to use information systems have been named as incentive factors in many researches (Moeller, Svahn, 2004 [51]; Riege [52]; Ling, Sandhu, Jain [53]). Although communication channels help the creation, storage and sharing scientists scientific knowledge, they are not considered the only factors required for knowledge sharing and in addition to them, social-organizational factors should also be considered in their scientific knowledge sharing (Marouf [3]). 12. Organizational factors Organizational factors affecting scientists knowledge sharing behavior cover a wide range of elements influence their motivation for scientific knowledge sharing. Organizational culture and structure are important factors reviewed mainly in knowledge sharing and management articles (Bartol, Srivastava [54]; Lin [11]; Shiue, etc., [23]). One of the key factors for knowledge sharing in each organization is to have a culture which strengthens the trust and honesty among the scientists. Buckman believes that to establish knowledge sharing among scientists it s essential to create an environment of trust for them (Dulaimi [55]). Organizational culture determines the personal and collective behavior (McDermott, O Dell [56]) and culture of knowledge sharing should be founded to change the views and behaviors of people (Hassanzadeh [57]). Although organizational culture is considered to be one of the most important organizational factors in scientists scientific knowledge sharing, focusing on organizational structure also facilitate the path for increasing the sharing of scientific knowledge. Today, most of managers know that improper organizational structures slow the processes and prevent COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 7

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge Figure 2 Research model the flow of information and knowledge between departments. Besides, such structures often take a lot of time to refine the knowledge in each phase. Knowledge sharing increases structures which create fewer boundaries between different organization sections (Sun [58]). In this case, such an organization will benefit from features like trust, psychological safety vs. risk, no improper prejudice towards different ideas and participation in decision makings (Nemanich, Vera [59]), and that organizations scientists will share their scientific knowledge more actively. Nowadays, Effect of personal, organizational and technological factors on how scientists behave in scientific knowledge sharing is an important issue. In this article, the factors affect knowledge sharing behavior, are well shown in Table 2. Actually, the effect of these three factors, along with the elements introduced in Theory of planned Behavior, offer a better understanding of the factors affect scientists behavior; by providing these factors and eliminating the barriers in national and international levels, scientists cooperation in research and scientific productions through scientific knowledge sharing can be achieved. Base on different factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge, the following model is designed: 13. Concluding Remarks Considering the mentioned discussions, the factors affect scientists behavior in scientific knowledge sharing can be reviewed based on Theory of planned behavior. positive attitude and intention, proper understanding of a certain behavior performance, and awareness from others expectations in knowledge sharing can lead to active behavior of 8 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh scientists in knowledge sharing; however, possessing such factors alone cannot determine the performance of active behavior by scientists, but there is a collection of factors and infrastructures which should be provided in addition to mentioned elements. Therefore, the infrastructures should be made to promote and raise the basis for knowledge sharing among the scientists in order to raise their motivation for scientific cooperation and co-authorship in national and international levels. Culture is the most important factor in determining the personal and collective behaviors in organizations and it should be paid attention by policy makers and managers as a key role in success of knowledge sharing programs. Also, rewards systems and organizational structures- as organizational factors affect the scientists knowledge-sharing behavior in the organizations. Therefore, proper rules and regulations- for implementation and practice of culture and suitable organizational structures- should be applied so as to enable scientists to cooperate and share their scientific knowledge and expertise with more trust. As, lack of proper organizational infrastructures, prevents the scientific knowledge sharing by scientists. Since scientists aim is increasing the cooperation and better scientific productions in different scientific areas, providing them with proper tools and technologies help the improvement of communication skills. Training the scientists to apply proper communication tools and software help them to take better advantage of collective knowledge. To increase scientists scientific knowledge sharing and move towards growth of scientific productions, by applying mentioned factors, we ll notice better active behavior of scientists in scientific knowledge sharing in national and international levels: Promoting scientists awareness towards the value and importance of knowledge sharing through proper organizational policies; Identifying the motivating factors for scientists in acquisition and sharing scientific knowledge; Identifying the barriers (preventive factors) for scientists in acquisition and sharing scientific knowledge; Give the value to knowledge sharing in the society; Establishing the centers for planning and improving the flow and transfer of knowledge and information among top scientists of different scientific fields; Establishing a scientific knowledge-sharing system in national and international level; Strengthening the cooperation between scientists by [use of] proper tools and technologies; Identifying scientists of different scientific fields and facilitating mutual cooperation among them; Training scientists to use their knowledge, store and retrieve their own and others experiences; COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 9

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge Optimizing scientists knowledge by providing facilities and conditions required to make the scientific knowledge applicable; Establishing reward systems in organizations for scientists; Providing proper environment in organizations to boost trust among scientists; References [1] Hart, R. Co-authorship in the academic library literature: a survey of attitude and behaviors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 16(5), 2000, pp. 339 345. [2] Hassanzadeh, M., Baghaei, S., Noroozi Chakoli, A. Co-authorship in Iranian articles of ISI journals during 1989-2005 and its relations with citations rates to them, 2009. [3] Marouf, L. The role of Business and social ties in organizational knowledge sharing: a case study a financial institution, (Doctoral dissertation).university of Pittsburgh, 2005. [4] Alawi, A. I., Marzooqi, N. Y., Mohammed, Y. F. Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors. Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 11(2), 2007, pp. 22 42. [5] Hollis, A. Co-Authorship and the Output of Academic Economists. Labour Economics, Vol. 8(4), 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=282012 [6] Frenken, K., Hölzl, W., de Vor, F. The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology & applied microbiology, Journal of Engineering Management and Technology, Vol. 22(1-2), 2005, pp. 9 30. [7] Babalhavaeji, F., Jafarzadeh Kermani, Z. Knowledge sharing behavior influences: a case of Library and Information Science faculties in Iran. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 16(1), 2011, pp. 1 14. [8] Lin, C. P. To share or not to share: modeling knowledge sharing using exchange ideology as a moderator. Personnel Review, 36(3), 2007, pp. 457 475. [9] Antonova, A., Csepregi, A., Jr, A. M. How to Extend the ICT Used at Organizations for Transferring and Sharing Knowledge. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9(1), 2011, pp. 37 56. [10] Bock, G. W. and Kim, Y. G. Determinants of the individual s knowledge sharing behavior: the theory of reasoned action perspective. Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Information System (PACIS), 2002, pp. 1008 1023. [11] Lin, W. b. The effect of knowledge sharing model, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34(2), 2008, pp. 1508 1521. [12] Chatzoglou, P. D., Vraimaki, E. Knowledge-sharing behavior of bank employees in Greece, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15(2), 2009, pp. 245 266. [13] Karimi, Y. Social psychology: Concepts, Theories, and Applications. Third Edition, Tehran: Arasbaran, 2010. [14] Lichtenstein, S., & Hunter, A. Toward a Receiver-Based Theory of Knowledge Sharing. In Jennex, M. E. (Ed.), Current Issues in Knowledge Management, 2008, pp. 86 103. 10 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh [15] Sohail, M. S., Daud, S. Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions Perspectives from Malaysia, The journal of information and knowledge management systems, Vol. 39(2), 2009, pp. 125 142. [16] Zhikun, D., Fungfai, N. Knowledge sharing among architects in a project design team. Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 3(2), 2009, pp. 130 142 [17] Chennamaneni, A. Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors: Developing and testing an integrated theoretical model. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Alington, 2006. [18] Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975. [19] Gagné, M. A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, Vol. 48, 2009, pp. 571 589. [20] Sheeran, P. and Orbell, S. Implementation intentions and repeated behaviours: enhancing the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29, 1999, pp. 349 69. [21] Tohidinia, Z., Mosakhani, M. Knowledge sharing behavior and its predictors, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110(4), 2010, pp. 611 631. [22] Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50(2), 1991, pp. 179-211. [23] Shiue, Y. C., Chang, C. C., Yang, S. Y., Chen, C. A. Organizational knowledge transfer within multinational corporations, Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2(1), 2010, pp. 76 92. [24] Szulanski, G. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, (1996, pp. 27 43. [25] Dunford, R. Key challenges in the search for the effective management of knowledge in management consulting firms, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4(4), 2000, pp. 295 302. [26] Grandori, A. and Kogut, B. Dialogue on organization and knowledge, Organization Science, Vol. 13(3), 2002, pp. 224 31. [27] Vithessonthi, C. Social Interaction and Knowledge Sharing Behaviors in Multinational Corporations. The Business Review, Vol. 10(2), 2008, pp. 324 331. [28] Dong, G., Liem, C. G. Grossman, M. Knowledge-sharing intention in Vietnamese organizations. Journal of information and knowledge management systems, Vol. 40(3/4), 2010, pp. 262 276. [29] Julibert, S. Employee attitudes to information sharing: a case study at the European Central Bank, Records Management Journal. Vol. 18(3), 2008, pp. 194 204 [30] Bock, G. W., Kim, Zmud, R. W., Y. G. and Lee, J. N. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29(1), 2005, pp. 87 111. COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 11

Factors that affect scientists behavior to share scientific knowledge [31] Shin, C. H., Ramayah, T. and Jahani, S. Using Theory of Reasoned Action to explain intention to share knowledge among academics, 2008. Available at: www.apera.nie.edu.sg/ activities/.../apera08_day_3_programme.pdf [32] Lu, H. P., Hsiao, K. L. Understanding intention to continuously share information on weblogs, Internet Research, Vol. 17(4), 2007, pp. 345 361. [33] Li, J., Mizerski, D., Lee, A., Liu, F. The relationship between attitude and behavior: An empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 21(2), 2009, pp. 232 242. [34] Teh, P. L., Yong, C. C., Chong, C. W., Yew, S. Y. Do the Big Five Personality Factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian Universities, Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 16(1), 2011, pp. 47 62 (35] Liao, C., Chen, J. L., Yen, D. C. Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, 2007, pp. 2804 2822. [36] Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R. and Louis, W. R. Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28, 2008, pp. 318 326. [37] Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21(4), 2000, pp. 473 96. [38] Cyr, S., Choo, C. W. The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 66(6), 2010, pp. 824 846. [39] Hung, S. Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H. M., Lin, W. M. The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals knowledge sharing behavior. Int. J. Human Computer Studies, 2011, pp. 1-39. [40] Aulawi, H., Sudirman, I., Suryadi, K., Govindaraju, R. Knowledge sharing behaviour, antecedent and their impact on the individual innovation capability, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 5(12), 2009, pp. 2238 2245. [41] Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y. and Wei, K. K. Knowledge producers and consumers, In Schwartz, D. J., Ed, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference, Pennsylvania, 2006, pp. 459 466. [42] Gao, Sheng. (2004). Understanding knowledge sharing behavior. Master s thesis. The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology. Retrieved April 01, 2011, from http:// lbxml.ust.hk/th_imgo/b834876.pdf. [43] Soller, A. L. Computational analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburg, 2002. [44] Chow, W. S. and Chan, L. S., Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing, Information and Management, Vol. 45, 2008, pp. 458 65. [45] Van den Hooff, B. and Leeuw van Weenen, F., Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 11(1), 2004, pp. 13 24. 12 COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First)

Roghayeh Ghorbani Bousari and Mohammad Hassanzadeh [46] Hendriks, P., Sousa, C., Motivation for Knowledge Work, in: David G. Schwartz (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management; Hershey (PA): Idea Group Publishing, 2006, pp. 656 664. [47] Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., Balasubramanian, S. How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26, 2008, pp. 426 445. [48] Swift, M., Balkin, D. B., Matusik, S. F. Goal orientations and the motivation to share knowledge, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14(3), 2010, pp. 378 393. [49] Samarah, I. M. Collaboration Technology Support for Knowledge Conversion in Virtual Teams, (Doctoral dissertation). Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2006. [50] Reychav,I., Weisberg, J. Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14(2), 2010, pp. 285 300. [51] Moeller, K. and Svahn, S., Crossing East-West boundaries: knowledge sharing in intellectual business networks, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33(3), 2004, pp. 219 28. [52] Riege, A. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9(3), 2005, pp. 18 35. [53] Ling, C. W., Sandhu, M.S., Jain, K. K. Knowledge sharing in an American multinational company based in Malaysia. Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 21(2), 2009, pp. 125 142. [54] Bartol, K.M., Srivastava, A. Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 9(1), 2002, pp. 64 76. [55] Dulaimi, M. F. Case studies on knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14(6), 2007, pp. 550 567. [56] McDermott, R. and O Dell, C. Overcoming culture barriers to sharing knowledge, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5(1), 2001, pp. 76 85. [57] Hassanzadeh, M. Knowledge management: concepts and infrastructures: Tehran, Ketabdar, 2009. [58] Sun, P. Five critical knowledge management organizational themes. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14(4), 2010, pp. 507 523. [59] Nemanich, L. A. and Vera, D. Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 20, 2009, pp. 19 33. COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (Online First) 13