Original Article Effect of glucagon on insulin secretion through camp signaling pathway in MIN6 cells



Similar documents
glucose and fatty acids to raise your blood sugar levels.

Regulation of Metabolism. By Dr. Carmen Rexach Physiology Mt San Antonio College

Creatine Kinase Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit ABE assays; Store at -20 C

Diabetes mellitus. Lecture Outline

Chapter 45: Hormones and the Endocrine System

INTRODUCTION TO HORMONES

Endocrine Glands and the General Principles of Hormone Action

7 Answers to end-of-chapter questions

ISOLATION AND PROPERTIES OF SECRETORY GRANULES FROM RAT ISLETS OF LANGERHANS. II. Ultrastructure of the Beta Granule

No Disclosures. Learning Objectives 10/25/13

Endocrine Responses to Resistance Exercise

The Background for the Diabetes Detection Model

Describe how these hormones exert control quickly by changes in phosphorylation state of enzyme, and more slowly by changes of gene expression

INSULIN AND INCRETIN THERAPIES: WHAT COMBINATIONS ARE RIGHT FOR YOUR PATIENT?

n-heptane and /i-hexane Enhance in a Dose-Dependent Manner Insulin Binding to Erythrocytes and Its Degradation

Regenerative Medicine : A Promising Approach In Overcoming Diabetes As An Increasing Economic Health Burden

RayBio Creatine Kinase (CK) Activity Colorimetric Assay Kit

Fight or Flight Response: Play-by-Play

Diabetes Mellitus. Melissa Meredith M.D. Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes

Hormones & Chemical Signaling

DRUGS FOR GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT AND DIABETES

Actions of Hormones on Target Cells Page 1. Actions of Hormones on Target Cells Page 2. Goals/ What You Need to Know Goals What You Need to Know

TransIT Transfection Reagent

25-hydroxyvitamin D: from bone and mineral to general health marker

CFSE Cell Division Assay Kit

Class time required: Two 40-minute class periods + homework. Part 1 may be done as pre-lab homework

CytoSelect LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit

Why is HDL Cholesterol Low in People with Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Tuberculosis And Diabetes. Dr. hanan abuelrus Prof.of internal medicine Assiut University

Hormonal Cycles. 1. Briefly describe each component of an endocrine feedback loop: Stimulus. Production Cell. Hormone. Target Cell. Target Cell Action

Predict Reactivity Note Chicken (100%), Sheep (100%), Rhesus Monkey (100%), Chimpanzee (100%), Bovine (100%), Guinea pig (100%)

Stamcelleforskning- helbreder diabetes? Diabetes, beta cells and stem cell based therapy

Creatine Kinase Activity Assay Kit (Colorimetric)

Islet Viability Assessment by Single Cell Flow Cytometry

Sponsor. Novartis Generic Drug Name. Vildagliptin. Therapeutic Area of Trial. Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication. Investigational.

Overview of Diabetes Management. By Cindy Daversa, M.S.,R.D.,C.D.E. UCI Health

trends in the treatment of Diabetes type 2 - New classes of antidiabetic drugs. IAIM, 2015; 2(4): 223-

DIABETES MEDICATION-ORAL AGENTS AND OTHER HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS

Phil. J. Internal Medicine, 47: 25-30, Jan.-Feb., 2009

A prospective study on drug utilization pattern of anti-diabetic drugs in rural areas of Islampur, India

Sweet-taste receptors, glucose absorption and insulin release: Are LCS nutritionally active?

Mechanism of hormone action

New Insights and New Therapies for Insulin Resistance

Type 2 Diabetes - Pros and Cons of Insulin Administration

Take a moment Confer with your neighbour And try to solve the following word picture puzzle slides.

The Need for a PARP in vivo Pharmacodynamic Assay

Effect of Coccinia indica on Blood Glucose Levels in Alloxan-induced Diabetic Mice. Kathryn Niedzielski Advisor: Dr. Linda Swift

Vitamin D and Cardiometabolic risk

INSULIN PRODUCTS. Jack DeRuiter

PNA BRAF Mutation Detection Kit

CD3/TCR stimulation and surface detection Determination of specificity of intracellular detection of IL-7Rα by flow cytometry

Published Quarterly Mangalore, South India ISSN Volume 4, Issue 1; January-March 2005

Protein extraction from Tissues and Cultured Cells using Bioruptor Standard & Plus

Chapter 25: Metabolism and Nutrition

Prevalence and Characteristics of Low Serum Testosterone Levels in Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Naïve to Injectable Therapy

Western Blot Analysis with Cell Samples Grown in Channel-µ-Slides

Product Datasheet. Secreted Alkaline Phosphatase Reporter Kit NBP Unit Size: 1 Kit. Storage is content dependent.

Distinguishing between Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 and Type 2, (with Overview of Treatment Strategies)

Reversing type 2 diabetes: pancreas composition and function during return to normal glucose tolerance

Evaporation-based Microfluidic Production of. Oil-free Cell-Containing Hydrogel Particles

Weight Loss Surgery and Bariatric Nutrition. Jeanine Giordano, MS, RD, CDN

Tissue Culture 1 Cell/ Microplates 2 HTS- 3 Immunology/ HLA 4 Microbiology/ Bacteriology Purpose Beakers 5 Tubes/Multi-

Department Of Biochemistry. Subject: Diabetes Mellitus. Supervisor: Dr.Hazim Allawi & Dr.Omar Akram Prepared by : Shahad Ismael. 2 nd stage.

Related KidsHealth Links. Discussion Questions

Creatine Kinase (CK) Enzymatic Assay Kit Manual Catalog #:

Assessment of Islet Functional Potency by Glucose Stimulated Insulin Secretion

Treatment Approaches to Diabetes

Transfection reagent for visualizing lipofection with DNA. For ordering information, MSDS, publications and application notes see

6.4 Diabetes. 6 Priority diseases and reasons for inclusion. Background. Developments since See Background Paper 6.4 (BP6_4DM.

Intensive Insulin Therapy in Diabetes Management

THE IMPACT OF USING BLOOD SUGAR HOME MONITORING DEVICE TO CONTROL BLOOD SUGAR LEVEL IN DIABETIC PATIENTS

I. ACID-BASE NEUTRALIZATION, TITRATION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Second- and Third-Line Approaches for Type 2 Diabetes Workgroup: Topic Brief

thebiotutor. AS Biology OCR. Unit F211: Cells, Exchange & Transport. Module 1.2 Cell Membranes. Notes & Questions.

Absorption of Drugs. Transport of a drug from the GI tract

Liver Function Tests. Dr Stephen Butler Paediatric Advance Trainee TDHB

Sex Hormone Testing by Mass Spectrometry

Diagnosis, classification and prevention of diabetes

serum protein and A/ G ratio

Statins and Risk for Diabetes Mellitus. Background

Mouse GLP-2 ELISA. For quantitative determination of mouse GLP-2 in serum or plasma samples.

Chapter-21b: Hormones and Receptors

Fighting the Battles: Conducting a Clinical Assay

The diagram below summarizes the effects of the compounds that cells use to regulate their own metabolism.

The Endocrine System

regulation of ECF composition and volume regulation of metabolism thyroid hormones, epinephrine, growth hormone, insulin and glucagon

David Shu, MD, FRCPC Endocrinology, Royal Columbian Hospital October 8 th, 2010

ELISA BIO 110 Lab 1. Immunity and Disease

Guidance for Industry Diabetes Mellitus Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk in New Antidiabetic Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

Lesson 3: Blood glucose

Cancer treatment and diabetes

Modulating Glucose Uptake in Skeletal Myotubes:

Optimized Protocol sirna Test Kit for Cell Lines and Adherent Primary Cells

Anti-ATF6 α antibody, mouse monoclonal (1-7)

Non-clinical development of biologics

Transcription:

Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980 www.ijcep.com /ISSN:1936-2625/IJCEP0006716 Original Article Effect of glucagon on insulin secretion through camp signaling pathway in MIN6 cells Si-Yuan Li 1*, Jun Li 2*, Guo-Lei Cao 2, Zhen Zhang 1, Yan-Wen Wang 1, Kan Sun 2 1 School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832002, Xinjiang, China; 2 Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832002, Xinjiang, China. * Equal contributors. Received February 4, 2015; Accepted March 30, 2015; Epub May 1, 2015; Published May 15, 2015 Abstract: Objective: To explore the direct regulation effects and mechanisms of glucagon in insulin secretion of MIN6 cells that in the kind of the islet β cells. Methods ICUE3 and PCDNA3.1 plasmid were transfected to the MIN6 cells by electroporation transfection, and then treated with different concentrations of glucagon (Glg) and glucose (Glu). Biosensor technology that based on the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to monitor the change of camp quantitatively and real-time. The level of camp and insulin were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The receptor of Glg was mainly located on the cell membrane in MIN6 cells. Compared with the 0 ng/l Glg group in the Glu-free state, the average value of CFP/YFP increased 4% ± 0.02 in the 500 ng/l Glg group, and the value in the 1000 ng/l Glg group increased 6% ± 0.03 (P > 0.05). While in the high-glu (16.7 mmol/l) state, the value increased 11% ± 0.02 in the 500 ng/l Glg group, and increased 23% ± 0.06 in the 1000 ng/l Glg group when compared with the 0 ng/l Glg group(p < 0.01). The levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l Glg group were higher than those of the 100 ng/l and 0 ng/l Glg group in the condition of Glu-free (81.27±6.29, 76.73±2.10,39.45±2.83, 40.36±4.20; P < 0.01). The levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l, 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l Glg group were higher than those of the 0 ng/l Glg group, at the meanwhile, the levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l Glg group were also higher than 100 ng/l Glg group in the condition of low- Glu (2.8 mmol/l) (92.91±7.35, 90.36±3.15, 65.82±10.49, 46.73±1.05; P < 0.01). And this trend in the condition of high-glu was almost to the low-glu (106.75±7.26, 94.18±2.99, 83.09±1.16, 55.60±5.51, P < 0.01). The levels of the insulin of 1000 ng/l, 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l Glg group were higher than those of the 0 ng/l Glg group. While 1000 ng/l Glg group was higher than that of the 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l Glg group in the condition of Glufree (1844.02±200.93, 1387.94±483.12, 1251.817±60.30, 787.33±81.72; P < 0.01). The levels of the insulin of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l Glg group were higher than those of the 100 ng/l and 0 ng/l Glg group, and the 1000 ng/l and was also higher than 500 ng/l Glg group in the condition of low-glu (1552.31±81.20, 1285.62±131.67, 1020.85±42.60, 762.89±26.94, P < 0.01). And this trend in the condition of high-glu was almost to the low-glu (1898.337±169.03, 1399.30±148.66, 1061.735±9.13, 972.89±22.19; P < 0.01). The levels of camp and insulin secretion of MIN6 cells had a positive correlation in different Glu conditions (r 2 = 0.559, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Glg may stimulate insulin secretion by increasing camp levels in the way of concentration gradient within the islet β cell lines--min6 cells. And the increasing trend was Glu dependent. Keywords: Glucagon, camp, insulin, islet β cells, diabetes mellitus Introduction Diabetes (diabetes mellitus, DM) is a frequently occurring disease worldwide. According to statistics [1], the global number of 20-79 year-old adult DM patients had more than 285 million, and is still in growth. DM and it s variety of complications may involve multiple body organs, and lead tremendous physical and mental damage on patients, and a heavy financial burden on families and society. In recent years, many researchers have begun to focus on the DM. Some studies have shown that there is a close relationship between the incidence of DM and insulin insufficient of islet β cells [2, 3]. The secretion of insulin is also affected by a variety of hormones and neurotransmitters except for a variety of energy materials, such as glucagon (Glucagon, Glg), glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1), epinephrine (E) and somatostatin (SS) and

Table 1. Different Groups for measuring the camp by FRET Classification Groups Plasmid Treatment Treatment group A (0 ng/l Glg) ICUE3 0 mmol/l Glu, 16.7 mmol/l Glu B (500 ng/l Glg) ICUE3 0 mmol/l Glu, 16.7 mmol/l Glu C (1000 NG/L Glg) ICUE3 0 mmol/l Glu, 16.7 mmol/l Glu Negative control group D (1000 NG/L Glg) PCDNA3.1 0 mmol/l Glu, 16.7 mmol/l Glu E (1000 NG/L Glg) No 0 mmol/l Glu, 16.7 mmol/l Glu Table 2. Different Groups for detecting the camp and Insulin by ELISA Glucagon (ng/l) other hormones and peptides. They do not directly caused insulin secretion [4], but it may play a role in regulating the insulin secretion by adjusting the concentration of some of the second messenger pathways [5]. Glg is a hormone secreted by islet α cells. It mainly targets on the liver, on the other hand, Glg may regulate the insulin secretion directly by the regulation of adjacent β cells through the paracrine action. And the effect may only strengthen glucose-induced insulin secretion, not stimulate the generation of insulin directly [6]. Second messenger signaling molecules may be a key point involved in the regulation of insulin secretion [7, 8]. But the mechanism is not clear yet. In this study, biosensor technology that based on the FRET was used to monitor the change of camp in MIN6 cells quantitatively and real-time after the stimulation of different concentrations of glucagon and glucose, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the level of camp and insulin intracellular. Our study directly explored the specific role of Glg on regulating insulin secretion of islet β cells, and its possible mechanisms through second messenger camp pathway. Materials and methods Materials Glucose (mmol/l) 0 (No) 2.8 (Low) 16.7 (High) 0 (No) (1) (2) (3) 100 (Low) (4) (5) (6) 500 (Middle) (7) (8) (9) 1000 (High) (10) (11) (12) One mg glucagon powder was dissolved in the 10 ml PBS which with glacial acetic acid (10%) to make the stock solution of Glg, and then diluted to 100 ng/l (low-concentration) stepwise, 500 ng/l (middle-concentration), 1000 ng/l (high-concentration) with Krebs as the Glg working fluid. Glucose solution was added as needed to the Glg working fluid made a final concentration of 2.8 mmol/l (low-concentration) and 16.7 mmol/l (high-concentration) of glucose fluid. Cell culture MIN6 cell is a kind of islet β cell lines. It was cultured in a medium of DMEM (4.5 g/l glucose, 15% FBS, 2% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine, and 1 β- mercaptoethanol). Electroporation transfection After completion of MIN6 cells were trypsinized, 1000 rpm centrifuged at room temperature for 5 minutes, then added 100 µl electroporation buffer and 10 µg ICUE3 or PCDNA3.1 empty plasmid. The suspension was moved to electric rotor and transfected into electrical instrument for transfection. After transfection, cells were cultured in dishes, for ready to use. Measurement of camp production by biosensor technology that based on the FRET The transfected and treated cells were divided into five groups-a, B, C, D, and E. All the treatment groups and the negative control group were added 30 µmol/l forskolin as a positive control. We observed the changes of CFP/YFP colors with the changes of intracellular camp concentration, which indicated that the changes of camp concentration directly reflected by the results of the FRET. Measurement of camp and insulin secretion by ELISA -The MIN6 cells were divided into 12 groups according to the treating factors (n = 3 wells) (Table 2). After the cell grew well, we starved them, treated them differently, and then measured the camp concentration and insulin secretion by ELISA. 5975 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980

Figure 1. Expression of glucagon receptor on MIN6 cells (200 ). A, B. The forms of the cultured MIN6 cells (A: 100, B: 200 ); C. Expression of glucagon receptor on MIN6 cells. Statistical analysis Data were analyzed by the SPSS 17.0 software and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. To compare the mean of the groups, analysis of variance was used. Pearson correlation test was performed to determine the associations of camp and insulin. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference exist. Results Expression of glucagon receptor on the MIN6 cells MIN6 cells were irregularly shaped tile-like adherent growth (Figure 1A, 1B). By immunofluorescence staining, we can see the expression of Glg receptor in the MIN6 cells, and the expression mainly exist on the cell membrane (Figure 1C). camp biosensor expression and function in MIN6 cells To demonstrate whether the biosensor was working, we used the FSK as a positive control and found changed color of fluorescence and a increasing of CFP/YFP when stimulating the MIN6 cells (Figure 2). It indicated that the system was working well. CFP/YFP in different group measured by biosensor technology based FRET After transfection, MIN6 cells from the treated groups (A, B, C. (Table 1)) were placed in a con- 5976 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980

Figure 2. camp biosensor expression and function in MIN6 cells. The fluorescence color was changed after FSK treatment. Early cells are yellow (A), with the processing time, cells turn green (B), but soon become cyan-blue (C). The changes of color in MIN6 cells indicate the concentration of camp increasing. Figure 3. Change of CFP/YFP in MIN6 cells after different treatments. A-C. CFP/YFP change in a single MIN6 cell following application of glucose (0, 2.8, 16.7 mmol/l) and glucagon (0, 500, 1000 ng/l), compared with base level (the values measured 50 s before stimulation), the ratio (CFP/YFP) is higher (*P < 0.01), compared with the previous stage, the ratio is higher (ΔP < 0.01, P < 0.01). The increase in the ratio (CFP/YFP) indicates an increase in camp concentration. D. Quantity data of different concentrations of glucagon on camp formation. When highglucose condition, camp concentration is higher than those in in 500 ng/l glucagon group. Every experiment was repeated three times. focal microscope, then the previously prepared stimulation fluid was added (Table 1). The results showed that in glucose-free state the average value of CFP/YFP increased 4% ± 0.02 in the 500 ng/l glucagon group when compared with the 0 ng/l glucagon group. And this value in the 1000 ng/l glucagon group was 6% ± 0.03 (P > 0.05). While in the high-glucose state, the value increased 11% ± 0.02 of the 500 ng/l glucagon group, and 23% ± 0.06 of the 1000 ng/l glucagon group when compared with the 0 ng/l glucagon group (P < 0.01) (Figure 3). This result means that the level of camp is increasing following the Glg concentra- 5977 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980

Figure 4. Comparison of different groups of camp formation Measured by ELISA. A-C, gradients of camp concentration following application of glucose (0, 2.8, 16.7 mmol/l) and glucagon (0, 100, 500, 1000 ng/l) respectively, whichever glucose concentration, compared with groups (0 ng/l Glg), *P < 0.05; compared with groups (100 ng/l Glg), ΔP < 0.01. D, comparison of the two methods (FRET and ELISA) of camp concentration, there was a same increasing trend of them. tion going up in high-glucose condition. But in glucose-free condition, there is no significant difference (P > 0.05). Change of camp in different groups measured by ELISA The level of the camp in MIN6 cells was detected by ELISA, the results showed that the levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 100 ng/l and 0 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of glucose-free (P < 0.01). The levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l, 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 0 ng/l glucagon group, at the meanwhile, the levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l glucagon group were also higher than 100 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of low-glucose (2.8 mmol/l) (P < 0.01). Otherwise, the levels of the camp of 1000 ng/l, 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 0 ng/l glucagon group and 1000 ng/l was higher than 100 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of high-glucose (16.7 mmol/l) (P < 0.01). In a word, with the increasing of glucose concentration, the concentration of the camp stimulated by Glg has increased more. In different concentrations of Glu, the level of camp was increasing following the Glg concentration going up, which showing some of the concentration gradient and the trend was more of obviously following the Glg concentration. This result was also similar to the results observed by the FRET method dynamical (Figure 4D). Comparison of different groups of insulin secretion measured by ELISA and correlation analysis between the level of camp and insulin The results showed that the levels of the insulin of 1000 ng/l, 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 0 ng/l glucagon group. While 1000 ng/l glucagon group was higher than that of the 500 ng/l and 100 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of 5978 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980

Figure 5. Comparison of different groups of insulin secretion measured by ELISA and correlation analysis between the level of camp and insulin. A-C, gradients of the concentration of Insulin secretion following application of glucose (0, 2.8, 16.7 mmol/l) and glucagon (0, 100, 500, 1000 ng/l), respectively. Compared with 0 ng/l Glg groups, *P < 0.05; compared with 100 ng/l Glg groups, ΔP < 0.01, compared with 500 ng/l Glg groups, P < 0.01. D. correlation analysis between camp and insulin (r = 0.748, P = 0.005). glucose-free (P < 0.01). The levels of the insulin of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 100 ng/l and 0 ng/l glucagon group, at the meanwhile, the 1000 ng/l and was also higher than 500 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of low-glucose (P < 0.01). Otherwise, the levels of the insulin of 1000 ng/l and 500 ng/l glucagon group were higher than those of the 100 ng/l and 0 ng/l glucagon group and 1000 ng/l was higher than 500 ng/l glucagon group in the condition of high-glucose (P < 0.01). The effect of Glg to insulin secretion showed a concentration gradient, especially in the condition of high-glucose (Figure 5A-C). In addition, when we made the correlation analysis between the level of camp and insulin with the treatment of different concentrations. The results showed a positive correlation between the level of camp and insulin(r = 0.748, P < 0.01; Figure 5D). Discussion According to the report [9], Glg receptors are coupled with seven transmembrane G protein. In addition to distribution in the liver, Glg receptors are also widely distributed on the kidneys, brain, intestine, spleen, thyroid, pancreatic α and β cells and other tissues or cells. In islet β cells, Glg may regulate the insulin secretion through the second messenger-camp. In this study, MIIN6 cells were treated with different concentrations of Glg at different concentrations of Glu. The biosensor technology based on the FRET method was used to monitor the change of camp in MIN6 cells quantitatively and real-time with the stimulation of different concentrations of glucagon and glucose. The results showed in the high-glucose state, the increasing Glg can stimulate the camp level increasing. So we speculate that it may correlate with the threshold value, reaction speed and the Glu-dependent of Glg effects on insulin 5979 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980

secretion in MIN6 cells. The level of the camp and insulin in MIN6 cells was detected by ELISA. The results also showed that the level of camp and insulin secretion was going up following the Glg increasing. This situation presented a concentration gradient, and was consistent with the results of biosensor method. On the other hand, the trend is more obviously in Gluexisted state. For the detecting of Ins secretion, the glycemic effect of Glg in vivo can be excluded because of the basis of islet β cells cultured in vitro. So our results directly reflect the insulin secretion in β cells by the regulation of Glg. When we made the correlation analysis between the level of camp and Ins with the treatment. The results showed a positive correlation (r = 0.748, R 2 = 0.559, P < 0.01). We supposed that camp signaling pathway plays an important role in the process of insulin secreting in the islet β cells. In summary, glucagon may stimulate the insulin secretion by increasing camp levels in the way of concentration gradient within the islet β cell lines-min6 cells. And the increasing trend was glucose dependent. And there is a positive correlation between the level of camp and insulin. So, the study results will provide a experimental basis for the mechanism of insulin secretion and lay a foundation for the further development of new DM therapeutic drugs. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the funding of the special fund for Dr of The Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops (2012BB019). Disclosure of conflict of interest Address correspondence to: Drs. Jun Li and Kan Sun, Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi 832002, China. Tel: +86-187-03093580; Fax: +86-187-03093580; E-mail: xjlijun@163.com (JL); sunkan_shz86@126.com (KS) References [1] Yang W, Lu J, Weng J. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1090-1101. [2] Qiao J, Chen J. Type 2 diabetes mellitus with islet beta cell function defect. J Diabetes 2000; 8: 42-44. [3] Wilson PW, Meigs JB, Sullivan L. Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1068-74. [4] Bruning JC. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 2000; 289: 2122-2125. [5] Brennesvik EO. Adrenaline potentiates insulinstimulated PKB activation via camp and Epac: implications for cross talk between insulin and adrenaline. Cell Signal 2005; 17: 1551-1559. [6] Tian G, Sandler S, Gylfe E, Tengholm A. Glucose- and Hormone- Induced camp Oscillations in alpha- and beta-cells Within Intact Pancreatic Islets. Diabetes 2011; 60: 1535-43. [7] Peschke E, Mühlbauer E. New evidence for a role of melatonin in gluc- ose regulation. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 24: 829-41. [8] Idevall-Hagren O, Barg S, Gylfe E, Tengholm A. camp mediators of pulsatile insulin secretion from glucose-stimulated single beta-cells. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 23007-18. [9] Authier F, Desbuquois B. Glucagon receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65: 1880-1899. None. 5980 Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(5):5974-5980