Sandia National Laboratories- Albuquerque Special Exposure Cohort Petition Evaluation Report 188



Similar documents
Lung Cancer and Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

White Paper: Evaluation of Petitioner Concerns About Data Falsification and/or Data Invalidation in RFP Building 123 Based on Worker Allegations

Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program (EEOICPA)

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

Radiation Safety at LLNL General Employee Radiological Training GERT HS6001-W

Radiation Safety Handbook

Leukemia and Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

WM2012 Conference, February 26-March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Studying One Million U.S. Radiation Workers and Veterans Why, Who and How

PERSONNEL MONITORING AND DOSIMETRY POLICIES

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Individual Monitoring Services (IMS) for External and Internal Exposures

Leaflet 14. Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting

Facility Hazard Categorization and Change Management Process

Cancer and Workers Exposed to Ionizing Radiation

IBC Nuclear Energy Liability Exclusion. Explained

Analysis of ISM Activity-level Work Planning and Control Within DOE. Stephen L. Domotor Office of Analysis Office of Health, Safety and Security

HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM INVENTORY

Audit Report. The National Nuclear Security Administration Contractors' Disability Compensation and Return-to-Work Programs

ASSESSMENT REPORT GPO WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM. September 30, 2009

Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. Actions Needed to Clarify Use of Contractor Assurance Systems for Oversight and Performance Evaluation

REAC/TS Radiation Accident Registry: Update of Accidents in the United States. Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee

1. Organization and Management of UNR Safety Programs

Plutonium vs. Uranium: The Road Less Traveled. In a world where nuclear proliferation may no longer be held back by the guise of antiproliferation

Radiological Control Technician Training Technician Qualification Standard

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 88045

Liability Insurance Guidelines For Water Restoration and Mold Contractors April 2013

University of Massachusetts Lowell College of Arts and Sciences Department of Physics and Applied Physics

NRC Sponsored Training Courses Available to Agreement State and Master Material Licensee Students

Wisconsin Chapter DHS 157- Radiation Protection Regulatory Guide May, 2010

Elements of an Effective Health and Safety Program. Health and Safety Program Management Guidelines

NRC s Program for Remediating Polluted Sites J.T. Greeves, D.A. Orlando, J.T. Buckley, G.N. Gnugnoli, R.L. Johnson US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel. U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C

Basics of Nuclear Physics and Fission

What is Scientific Consulting?

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

TRAINING PROGRAMS IN MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE UNITED STATES

Solar Energy Production

Radiation Rule Guide. Veterinary Facilities. Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-45, Radiation Control. Hawaii State Department of Health

Radiologic Technology Program. Radiation Safety and Protection Program

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT LEVELING GUIDE

United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards William F. Kane, Director

Harvard University Radiation Safety Manual

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

Structure and Properties of Atoms

Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan

SOP #: Revision #: Current Version Implementation Date: Page #: Page 1 of 10 Last Reviewed/Update Date: Expiration

centre for radiation protection

Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life

Radiological Worker Training

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITY TRAINING PROGRAMS. (Formerly Titled: Guidelines for Evaluation of Nuclear Facility Training Programs)

Questionnaire for NORM service providers

UNDERSTANDING THE AIR SAMPLING DATA

BWC Division of Safety and Hygiene

Contract Audit Report

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

Contractor Safety Management

Activities at temporary job site utilizing U.S. NRC Radioactive Material License # Amendment (,

Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioctive waste

PREMISES LIABILITY INSURANCE

FY 2016 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM ACT

AUDIT REPORT. The Department of Energy's Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol Telecommunications Networks

Objectives 404 CHAPTER 9 RADIATION

NORM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES & PRINCIPLES

National Radiation Air Monitoring Network National Environmental Monitoring Conference San Antonio -- August 6, 2013

Section 4 RADIATION SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS

Incomplete submissions will be declined

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. 25 th Annual Report to Congress March 2015

List of Contents Section 10, Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Legislation Page

Office of Research Facilities Development and Operations Contractor Safety Policy

INTERIM WASTE STORE CONSTRUCTION LICENCE EFFECTIVE CONTROL PLAN

TEXAS NON-SUBSCRIBER OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE POLICY APPLICATION

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY

Transcription:

Sandia National Laboratories- Albuquerque Special Exposure Cohort Petition Evaluation Report 188 Samuel Glover, PhD Research Health Scientist National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Division of Compensation Analysis and Support February 2012 Oakland, CA

Petition Overview Petition received on July 18, 2011 Petitioner proposed class definition: All Security Inspectors, Security Clerks, Firemen, Nonregular Recurrent Security Inspectors, Security Officers, Security Police Officers I, Security Police Officers II, Security Police Officers III, and Central Alarm System Operators that worked in any area at SNL-A for the period from January 1, 1963 through May 21, 2011

Petition Overview cont. Petition qualified for evaluation on October 21, 2011 Petition basis: radiation monitoring records for members of the proposed class have been lost, falsified, or destroyed Monitoring data retrieval problems incurred by NIOSH while processing individual claims and performing site data capture work supported the petition basis

Petition Overview cont. NIOSH evaluated class: All personnel that worked in any area at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for the period from January 1, 1963 through May 21, 2011. Sandia recently had a class added to the SEC: All personnel that worked in any area at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for the period from January 1, 1949 through December 31, 1962.

Sources of Available Information ORAU Team Technical Basis Documents (TBDs) ORAU Team Technical Information Bulletins (TIBs) and Procedures Interviews with former employees Existing claimant files Documentation provided by petitioner

Data Capture Efforts NIOSH Site Research Database (over 2500 documents) Fourteen data capture visits at Sandia Data capture of Sandia-related records at facilities across the DOE complex DOE Opennet (OSTI database) Internet search

Previous Dose Reconstructions NIOSH OCAS Claims Tracking System Information available as of March 22, 2011 Sandia National Laboratory claims submitted to NIOSH 367 Claims with employment during the period evaluated (1949-1962) 323 Dose reconstructions completed for claims with employment during the period 270 Claims containing internal dosimetry 37 Claims containing external dosimetry 256

Background In 1945, Z-Division of Los Alamos moved to what was to become the Sandia National Laboratory Covered period for Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, as established by the Department of Labor began in 1949 Weapons assembly, weapon ordnance engineering, and production coordination among various Atomic Energy Commission facilities (such as Clarksville, Medina, Pantex)

Background cont.

Potential External Radiological Exposures During the Class Period Broad spectrum of external hazards Photon exposures related to generators and accelerators and materials returned from weapons testing, reactors, and other research and waste materials Beta exposures from activated components, materials returned from weapons testing, and air filters from cloud sampling Neutron: weapons related, accelerators, reactors, neutron sources Sandia National Laboratory dosimeters did not measure neutrons until 1958

Potential Internal Radiological Exposures During the Class Period Broad spectrum of activities resulted in numerous radionuclides of concern Plutonium Tritium Uranium Americium Fission and activation products Thorium

Health Physics at SNL Health physics was the responsibility of the industrial hygiene division prior to 1957 at which point a health physics section was formed NIOSH located minimal documentation of the practices and requirements during the evaluation period Monitoring requirements were developed based on the judgment of departments, divisions, and supervisors Interviews indicate that coverage was temporal and ad hoc in nature, which continues until the time of the Tiger Team audits

Personal Monitoring Data Availability of monitoring data remains a significant concern November 2009: NIOSH notified DOE that case responses were incomplete, particularly as related to internal dosimetry data NIOSH acquired some individual data during data captures which were not provided in the responses

Personal Monitoring Data cont. January 2010: NIOSH re-requested the records for open Sandia National Laboratory cases DOE and Sandia National Laboratory are currently reviewing the best path forward for records at the site

Internal Dosimetry Data Availability Unlike many DOE facilities, Sandia National Laboratory did not report the number of bioassay samples analyzed Based on interviews, it is thought to be a small number per year NIOSH has obtained copies of some bioassay records as part of its site data captures and claim data requests

Internal Dosimetry Data Availability cont. Number of samples, by year, from NIOSH records are provided in the following table (after 1991 Sandia is providing a database) Data collected during the 1992 and 1994 were from Controls for Environmental Pollution (CEP) Company was convicted of fraud CEP data during this time frame is not used by NIOSH for dose reconstruction

Summary of In Vitro Bioassay Samples Obtained by NIOSH Table 6-1: Summary of Individual In Vitro Bioassay Results Year Tritium Uranium a Plutonium Beta/Gamma b 1963 281 23 2 32 1964 248 14 4-1965 224-13 - 1966 222-98 - 1967 540 41 85-1968 78 5 74-1969 187 17 46-1970 147 47 24-1971 281 85 6-1972 184 74-5 1973 193 110-8 1974 99 60-3 1975 46 62 - - 1976 126 64 - - 1977 83 50 - - 1978 138 30-1 1979 155 24-1 1980 147 40 - - 1981 213 40 - - 1982 79 59 - - 1983 26 26 - - 1984 28 74 - - 1985 25 29 - - 1986 33 70 - - 1987 24 29 - - 1988 24 24 - - 1989 10 - - - 1990 442 - - - 1991 281 - - -

External Monitoring Data External dosimetry results were centralized from the beginning at Sandia National Laboratory Personal data requests seem fairly complete for external dosimetry data based on NIOSH records Documentation of the pre-1957 external dosimetry program was not obtained by NIOSH Post-1957 documentation indicates workers in radiation areas were to be badged Available data represents a fairly substantial population and NIOSH has further developed external co-worker models and neutron-to-photon correction factors to determine dose to unmonitored workers

Feasibility of Dose Reconstructions NIOSH has determined that monitoring data, process information, and monitoring program information are insufficient to support bounding internal doses for the evaluated class. There are indications that additional data exist (microfilm /microfiche record set), but these data are not readily accessible nor is there completeness ascertained. Based on a lack of internal monitoring program documentation and source term information data for the evaluated period, NIOSH feels it cannot establish a bounding approach even if the microfilm/microfiche records were to become available. NIOSH concludes it cannot bound internal doses for the period from January 1, 1963 through December 31, 1994, but will continue to assess post-1994 dose reconstruction feasibility in a subsequent evaluation for SNL.

NIOSH Recommendation Regarding Non-SEC Claims Although NIOSH found that it is not possible to completely reconstruct internal radiation doses for the proposed class, NIOSH intends to use any internal and external monitoring data that may become available for an individual claim (and that can be interpreted using existing NIOSH dose reconstruction processes or procedures)

NIOSH Recommended Class All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked in any area at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, from January 1, 1963 through December 31, 1994, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort

NIOSH Recommendation Summary of Feasibility Findings for SEC-00162 (January 1, 1963 through December 31, 1994) Sources of Exposure Reconstruction Feasible Reconstruction Not Feasible Internal X External X - Gamma X - Beta X - Neutron X - Occupational Medical X-ray X

NIOSH Recommendation Summary of Feasibility Findings for SEC-00162 (January 1, 1995 through May 21, 2011) Sources of Exposure Reconstruction Feasible Reconstruction Not Feasible Internal External NIOSH continues to review the feasibility of dose reconstruction for this period for internal dose X - Gamma X - Beta X - Neutron X - Occupational Medical X-ray X