The Impact of an Economic Downturn on Employment of Nurses: Does Policy Play a Role? Mary Crea-Arsenio and Paul Rizk Andrea Baumann, RN PhD Mabel Hunsberger, RN PhD 2014 CAHSPR Conference May 12 15 Toronto, Ontario Funded by: 1
Outline Background to Policy Nursing workforce in Ontario Nursing Graduate Guarantee (NGG) Methods Results Conclusions 2
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a government policy in mitigating the impact of an economic downturn on full-time employment of new graduates nurses. 3
Background to Policy Healthcare restructuring (1990s): Increase in the casualization of the nursing workforce Decreased supply of registered nurses (RNs) and registered practical nurses * (RPNs) Early evidence identified an increased trend of part-time and casual employment SARs outbreak highlighted issues associated with casualized nursing workforce 4
Total RN Workforce 1994-2013 (Source: CNO, 2013) Count 115,000 110,000 105,000 100,000 95,000 90,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 Year of Renewal Total Possible Workforce Employed in Nursing Date of renewal counts reflects members who renewed at the end of the previous calendar year (e.g. 2012 data represents members who renewed at the end of 2011 for the 2012 practice year). Source: College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO), 2013. 5
Total RPN Workforce 1994-2013 (Source: CNO, 2013) 50,000 45,000 40,000 Count 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 Year of Renewal Total Possible Workforce Employed in Nursing Date of renewal counts reflects members who renewed at the end of the previous calendar year (e.g. 2013 data represents members who renewed at the end of 2012 for the 2013 practice year). Source: CNO, 2013. 6
Evidence for Policy Nursing Enhancement Fund 70% Full-Time Commitment New Graduate Initiative Nursing Graduate Guarantee 1999 2005 2004-2006 2007 Evidence Good Nursing Good Health Report (Nursing Task Force, 1999) Final Report on SARS (Walker, 2004) Educated and Underemployed (Baumann et al., 2006) Source: MOHLTC 1999, 2004, 2006, 2007; Nursing Task Force, 1999; Naylor, 2004; Baumann et al., 2006. 7
Nursing Graduate Guarantee (NGG) RED Strategies HealthForceOntario (HFO): Employment Portal Temporary Full-time Positions (supernumerary) Extended Orientation and Mentorship Programs GREEN Initiative MOHLTC Nursing Graduate Guarantee BLUE Goal/Outcome New Graduate Full-Time Employment 8
NGG Sequence Six months of funding Online employment portal (HFO * Jobs) facilitates matching between employers and new graduates Employer provides a temporary supernumerary FT position with extended orientation/mentorship Employer transitions new graduate into FT permanent position *HFO = HealthForceOntario. Source: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (2011). Guidelines for participation in the Nursing Graduate Guarantee. 9
Supply of Ontario New Graduate Nurses (Source: MTCU, 2013) 2012 3383 3265 2011 3287 3099 Graduation Year 2010 2009 2008 2989 2910 2681 2566 2346 2126 RN RPN 2007 2776 1837 2006 2058 1982 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Count Source: Baumann et al., 2013; MTCU, 2013. 10
Labour Demand: Profile of Ontario Healthcare Employers Profile of Ontario Healthcare Employers (N =1198*) Long-term Care Facilities (630) Community & Other Organizations (413) Hospitals (155) 13% 34% 53% *The total number of employers is an approximate number based on healthcare employers who have registered on the HealthForceOntario Jobs website. This number may include organizations that do not employ nurses. Source: MOHLTC, 2012. 11
New Graduate NGG Participation 3000 (RN and RPN) Number of New Graduate 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 648 2013 626 2213 581 2023 422 1378 550 436 1692 1813 RPN RN 0 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Fiscal Year of NGG Over six years, a total of 14,395 new graduate nurses obtained an NGG position (11,132 RNs and 3263 RPNs). Source: MOHLTC, unpublished NGG program data, 2012. 12
NGG Participants as a Percentage of all New Graduate Nurses 2012/13 34% Fiscal Year of NGG 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09 35% 32% 50% 59% NGG Non-NGG 2007/08 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of New Graduates Source: Baumann et al., 2013 13
Employer NGG Participants by Sector Fiscal Year of NGG Sector 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Hospital 97 91 106 104 96 103 Long-Term Care 87 64 86 99 94 82 Community and Other 38 20 32 27 22 29 Total 222 175 224 230 212 214 Source: : MOHLTC, unpublished NGG program data, 2013. 14
NGG Positions by Sector of Employment 100% Percentage 80% 60% 40% 85% 90% 85% 80% 84% 84% 85% Community /other LTC Hospital 20% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Fiscal Year Note: All totals as of June 22, 2012. Source: : MOHLTC, unpublished NGG program data, 2012. 15
Purpose Evaluating the impact of the NGG on full-time employment of new graduate nurses. Differential impact on RNs and RPNs Evolution of the initiative (i.e. changes in impact over time) 16
Data Sources On-line surveys administered yearly for 6 years Primary data source for conducting analysis Secondary database analysis (College of Nurses of Ontario) Mandatory registration database for all practicing Ontario nurses Used for sample validation and complementary information 17
Sample Characteristics Characteristic n (%) Designation RN 2766 (69.0) RPN 1242 (31.0) NGG Participation Yes 2178 (54.3) No 1830 (45.7) Age 19 or under 10 (0.2) 20-24 1832 (45.7) * 25-29 953 (23.8) 30-34 441 (11.0) 35-39 340 (8.5) 40 or over 432 (10.8) Gender Female 3668 (91.5) Male 340 (8.5) 18
Decrease in full-time employment amongst young workers (Source: CNO and Statistics Canada) 19
Comparison of full-time employment between NGG and non-ngg nurses (Source: Online Survey) 20
Logistic regression to assess impact of NGG Dependent variable: Employed in a full-time position at the time of survey (Yes/No) Primary covariate: NGG Participation Adjusted for age and gender Two interaction terms to examine differential impact: 1. NGG Participation * Designation 2. NGG Participation * Grad. Year 21
Results of logistic regression Year Odds Ratio (95% CI) for NGG Participation RN RPN 2008 1.51 (0.93-2.43) 2.43 (1.21-4.86) 2009 2.10 (1.50-2.94) 3.36 (1.26-8.68) 2010 1.64 (1.18-2.27) 2.62 (1.05-6.74) 2011 2.63 (1.88-3.69) 4.21 (1.63-10.8) 2012 2.66 (1.82-3.79) 4.26 (1.71-10.7) 22
Nurse preferences: Possible demand effect? (Source: HFO Online Survey) 23
Conclusions The NGG can mitigate negative impact on employment in worsening economic conditions. The extent to which the NGG impacts full-time employment may be dependent upon the relationship between position availability (supply) and preference for full-time employment (demand) 24
Limitations Sampling frame: Online survey participants accessed through HFO portal registration. Possibility of nonrepresentativeness. Although good agreement with population data (i.e. CNO) Self-Report: Particularly important with variable definitions of full-time employment 25
References Baumann, A., Hunsberger, M., & Crea-Arsenio, M. (2013, December). Health Human Resource Series Number 38. Employment integration of nursing graduates: Evaluation of a provincial policy strategy. Hamilton, Ontario: Nursing Health Services Research Unit, McMaster University. Hunsberger, M., Baumann, A. & Crea-Arsenio, M. (2013). The road to providing quality care: Orientation and Mentorship for New Graduate Nurses. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 45(4), 72-87. Baumann, A. Hunsberger, M & Crea-Arsenio, M (2012). Impact of Public Policy on Nursing Employment: Providing the Evidence. Canadian Public Policy, 38(2), 167-79. Baumann, A. Hunsberger, M & Crea-Arsenio, M (2012). Full-Time Work for Nurses: Employers' Perspectives Journal of Nursing Management. Baumann, A., Hunsberger, M., & Crea-Arsenio, M. (2011). Workforce Integration of New Graduate Nurses: Evaluation of a Health Human Resource Employment Policy. Healthcare Policy, 7(2), 47-59. 26
Contact Andrea Baumann, RN PhD Scientific Director Nursing Health Services Research Unit McMaster University Michael DeGroote Centre for Learning MDCL 3500 (905) 525-9140 ext. 22581 baumanna@mcmaster.ca 27