HEARING DECISION. Did the Department correctly determine the Claimant s community spouse income allowance? FINDINGS OF FACT



Similar documents
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

HEARING DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES him

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No TRN Case No DECISION AND ORDER

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Docket No QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

DECISION AND ORDER. After due notice, a hearing was held on. (Appellant) appeared and testified on her own behalf.

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

All Types of Assistance (TOA) This item identifies all of the following: Self-employment income types.

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Child care centers. Group child care homes. Family child care homes. License-exempt facilities. Unlicensed providers.

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION

OVERVIEW. Family Independence Program (FIP)

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No SAS Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No EDW 8 DECISION AND ORDER

Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No CL, Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No EDW, Case No DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No EDW DECISION AND ORDER

KENT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING

How To Get A Welfare Check

Lawyers 291 CHAPTER 18 LAWYERS

Arizona Administrative Code Title 6, Ch. 7 Department of Economic Security Child Support Enforcement

DEPARTMENT POLICY. FIP Only

Domestic Relations Orders Background and Instructions

If the noncompliant client:

COUNTY TAX REFUND SETOFF PILOT PROGRAM TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

Review: MA Lien Law and Estate Recovery Program

SAMPLE POVERTY EXEMPTION APPLICATION

What follows are three case studies that are actual cases, and actual documents associated with those documents, and the actual decisions issued by

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS FAIR HEARING DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

Cause No.: Application for an Expedited Order Under Rule 736 on a Home Equity, Reverse Mortgage, or Home Equity Line of Credit Loan

Medical transportation is available to: Family Independence Program (FIP) recipients. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients.

UNDERSTANDING ADOPTION SUBSIDIES STATE-SPECIFIC GUIDES FOR ADOPTIVE PARENTS AND ADOPTION PROFESSIONALS CALIFORNIA

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

How To File An Appeal In The United States

STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Hearings and Appeals

STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Hearings and Appeals

SER Question and Answer Grid

BEFORE THE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) This case arises from a timely protest of a State Tax Commission (Commission) decision

CHAPTER 7 SUBSIDIZED CHILD CARE APPEALS AND HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATUS OF MINORS AND CHILD SUPPORT Act 293 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

DEPARTMENT PHILOSOPHY

Medical transportation is available to: Family Independence Program (FIP) recipients. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients.

Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box Lansing, Michigan Phone (517)

Subpart C Administrative Wage Garnishment

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

SECURING A STAY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

Michigan IV-D Child Support Manual Department of Human Services

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

MEMORANDUM. RE: SCAO Administrative Memorandum Providing Information to Credit Reporting Agencies

for Medicaid trusts. Medicaid qualifying trusts (MQTs). Other trusts.

Before The State Of Wisconsin DIVISION OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

956 CMR: COMMONWEALTH HEALTH INSURANCE CONNECTOR AUTHORITY 956 CMR 12.00: ELIGIBILTY, ENROLLMENT AND HEARING PROCESS FOR CONNECTORCARE

TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PAMPHLET

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

STATE OF ARIZONA Department of Revenue Office of the Director (602) Janice K. Brewer Governor

TITLE 85 EXEMPT LEGISLATIVE RULE WORKERS' COMPENSATION RULES OF THE WEST VIRGINIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

7 Things Every Family Lawyer Should Know About Social Security Disability Law. Is It SSI or SSDI?

2:06-cv SFC-WC Doc # 13 Filed 01/29/07 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 55 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Notice of Formation Meeting for Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

Notice of Formation Solicitation for Official Committee of Student Creditors

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

O1 ONLINE BANKING Agreement Option 1 Credit Union

When should these forms be used?

Work-related injury.

LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT COMPENSATION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

How To Get Disability Insurance Benefits In The United States

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT YOUR CHAPTER 13 CASE PUT YOUR CASE NUMBER ON ALL PAYMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE OR THE COURT.

INSURANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (IAP) Michigan Department of Human Services

JURISDICTION: OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION DECISION / NON-PRECEDENTIAL P H DATE: MARCH 24, 2009

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACCOUNT FOR DECEDENT S ESTATE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. NEWSTAR ENERGY, U.S.A., INC., Case No. SL

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER PRIVACY ACT (EXCERPT) Act 454 of This act shall be known and may be cited as the "social security number privacy act".

TOP THINGS TO REMEMBER ABOUT THE TRUSTEE S OFFICE AND YOUR CHAPTER 13 CASE

9 FAM SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF ACTION IN PETITION CASES

Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.

THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of the day of, 200_, in Centerville, Montgomery County, Ohio, by and between (debtor), (hereinafter referred

Transcription:

STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN THE MATTER OF: Reg. No.: Issue No.: Case No.: Hearing Date: County: 2012 39490 2019 June 28, 2012 Wayne County DHS 82 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Lynn M. Ferris HEARING DECISION This matter is before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge pursuant to MCL 400.9 and MCL 400.37 following Claimant s request for a hearing. After due notice, a telephone hearing was held on June 7, 2012, from Detroit, Michigan. Participants on behalf of Claimant included the Claimant, (the Claimant s spouse) and a witness. The Claimant did not attend the hearing. Participants on behalf of the Department of Human Services (Department) included, ES and, FIM. ISSUE Did the Department correctly determine the Claimant s community spouse income allowance? FINDINGS OF FACT The Administrative Law Judge, based on the competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whole record, finds as material fact: 1. The Claimant is an ongoing recipient of Medical Assistance and resides in a Long Term Care facility. 2. The Department determined that the Claimant s Patient Pay Amount was $2604 based upon various unearned income received from retirement, RSDI and rental properties. Based upon its calculation it determined that the Community Spouse Allowance was $104.88. 3. At the hearing the Department could not determine how the Community Spouse Allowance amount was determined.

4. The Claimant s spouse also requested that the Department consider the effects of a Bankruptcy Chapter 13 Plan on its calculation of income and costs of mortgage expenses, which she had previously submitted to the Department and requested they be reviewed. The Department advised Claimant s spouse at the time that the plan could not be considered. Claimant Exhibit 1. 5. At all time relevant to the filing of the application and its denial, the Claimant was the owner of a rental property. 6. The Claimant, through his spouse, requested a hearing on February 28, 2012, protesting the computation of the Community Spouse Allowance and the Patient Pay Amount. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Department policies are contained in the Bridges Administrative Manual (BAM), the Bridges Eligibility Manual (BEM), and the Reference Tables Manual (RFT). The Family Independence Program (FIP) was established pursuant to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Public Law 104-193, 42 USC 601, et seq. The Department (formerly known as the Family Independence Agency) administers FIP pursuant to MCL 400.10, et seq., and Mich Admin Code, R 400.3101 through R 400.3131. FIP replaced the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program effective October 1, 1996. The Food Assistance Program (FAP) [formerly known as the Food Stamp (FS) program] is established by the Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended, and is implemented by the federal regulations contained in Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Department (formerly known as the Family Independence Agency) administers FAP pursuant to MCL 400.10, et seq., and Mich Admin Code, R 400.3001 through R 400.3015. The Medical Assistance (MA) program is established by the Title XIX of the Social Security Act and is implemented by Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Department of Human Services (formerly known as the Family Independence Agency) administers the MA program pursuant to MCL 400.10, et seq., and MCL 400.105. The Adult Medical Program (AMP) is established by 42 USC 1315, and is administered by the Department pursuant to MCL 400.10, et seq. The State Disability Assistance (SDA) program, which provides financial assistance for disabled persons, is established by 2004 PA 344. The Department of Human Services (formerly known as the Family Independence Agency) administers the SDA program pursuant to MCL 400.10, et seq., and 2000 AACS, R 400.3151 through R 400.3180. 2

The Child Development and Care (CDC) program is established by Titles IVA, IVE and XX of the Social Security Act, the Child Care and Development Block Grant of 1990, and the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. The program is implemented by Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 98 and 99. The Department provides services to adults and children pursuant to MCL 400.14(1) and Mich Admin Code, R 400.5001 through R 400.5015. At the hearing after a review of the amount of income and assets of the Claimant and his spouse it was determined that the Department did not meet its burden of proof, as it could not determine or explain how the Community Spousal Allowance of $104.88 was arrived at. Exhibit 13. Additionally, it is determined that the Department did not consider the effects of a Bankruptcy Chapter 13 Plan on the real estate mortgage expenses on the Claimant s real property. The Department should review and consider the Claimant s spouse s request that it consider the Chapter 13 Plan when determining the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance. The Chapter 13 Plan was entered in November 2011, when the Patient Pay Amount budget was prepared and determined. Claimant Exhibit 1. It may be that additional costs are being incurred as housing expenses as a result of the bankruptcy, which might require a change in the budget a fact which the Department should determine. Based upon the foregoing, the Department s determination of the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance is deemed incorrect and not in accordance with Department policy, as the Department did not provide sufficient evidence that its calculations were correct. DECISION AND ORDER The Administrative Law Judge, based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, finds that the Department did act properly when. did not act properly when it determined the the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance. Accordingly, the Department s AMP FIP FAP MA SDA CDC decision is AFFIRMED REVERSED for the reasons stated on the record. THE DEPARTMENT IS ORDERED TO DO THE FOLLOWING WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF MAILING OF THIS DECISION AND ORDER: 1. The Department shall intitiate recalculation of the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance, as determined in November 2011. 2. The Department shall consider the effects, if any, of the Chapter 13 Plan on its recalulation of the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance. 3

3. The Department shall issue a supplement/adjustment of the Patient Pay Amount and the Community Spouse Allowance for benefits the Claimant was otherwise entitled to receive, if any, in accordance with Department Policy. Date Signed: July 17, 2012 Lynn M. Ferris Administrative Law Judge for Maura Corrigan, Director Department of Human Services Date Mailed: July 17, 2012 NOTICE: Michigan Administrative Hearing System (MAHS) may order a rehearing or reconsideration on either its own motion or at the request of a party within 30 days of the mailing date of this Decision and Order. MAHS will not order a rehearing or reconsideration on the Department's motion where the final decision cannot be implemented within 90 days of the filing of the original request. (60 days for FAP cases). The Claimant may appeal the Decision and Order to Circuit Court within 30 days of the receipt of the Decision and Order or, if a timely request for rehearing was made, within 30 days of the receipt date of the rehearing decision. Claimant may request a rehearing or reconsideration for the following reasons: A rehearing MAY be granted if there is newly discovered evidence that could affect the outcome of the original hearing decision. A reconsideration MAY be granted for any of the following reasons: misapplication of manual policy or law in the hearing decision, typographical errors, mathematical error, or other obvious errors in the hearing decision that effect the substantial rights of the claimant: the failure of the ALJ to address other relevant issues in the hearing decision. Request must be submitted through the local DHS office or directly to MAHS by mail to: Michigan Administrative Hearings Reconsideration/Rehearing Request P. O. Box 30639 Lansing, Michigan 48909-07322 LMF/hw 4

cc: 5