STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.
|
|
- Alaina Russell
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Sharon A. Jones, Petitioner v State Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No Agency No. Agency: Case Type: Appeal Disability Department of Management & Budget Issued and entered this 21st day of December 2000 by Edward F. Rodgers Administrative Law Judge PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY This matter commenced with the filing of a Request for Hearing on May 26, Following the receipt of that request, the Bureau of Hearings, on June 5, 2000, issued a Notice of Hearing. The Notice of Hearing scheduled a contested case hearing to commence on August 9, On July 11, 2000, Mr. Douglas G. Kirk, Attorney at Law, filed, on behalf of the Petitioner herein, Sharon A. Jones, a request to adjourn the August 9, 2000, hearing date. On July 13, 2000, Mr. Stephen M. Rideout, Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of the Respondent herein, State Employees Retirement System, filed a response to the request for adjournment. Mr. Rideout indicated that Respondent had no objection to the
2 Page 2 adjournment. On July 14, 2000, the Presiding Judge issued and entered an Order Granting Adjournment, rescheduling the matter for August 29, On July 20, 2000, Mr. Rideout filed an Appearance on behalf of the State Employees Retirement System. On August 29, 2000, the hearing commenced as scheduled. Mr. Kirk appeared on behalf of Petitioner and Mr. Rideout appeared on behalf of Respondent. At the contested case hearing, the Petitioner testified on her own behalf. In addition, Petitioner Exhibit 1 was accepted into the record. Petitioner Exhibit 1 is a Michigan Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Evaluation dated August 8, On December 1, 2000, Petitioner Exhibit 2 was received. The Respondent called no witnesses during the hearing but introduced into the record Respondent Exhibit A. Respondent Exhibit A is the file from the Office of Retirement Services. This voluminous file contains many documents, including the following: 1. Application for Disability Retirement, 2. Accident Reports, 3. Michigan Department of Transportation Response and Position Description, 4. Accident Fund Materials, 5. Position Statements and Medical Documentation, and 6. Miscellaneous Correspondence. Following the close of the hearing on August 29, 2000, it was agreed that a second report would be received from Dr. Milcu, M.D. This report is in effect Petitioner Exhibit 1.
3 Page 3 In addition, a briefing schedule was agreed to by the parties. The transcript was completed and received by the parties on or about October 2, The Respondent filed its closing statement on October 31, On November 29, 2000, the Petitioner s brief supporting her claim was filed. ISSUES AND APPLICABLE LAW The general issue in this matter is whether Petitioner is disabled and entitled to a duty disability retirement. The specific issue in this case is whether the Petitioner qualifies for a duty disability retirement under the State Employees Retirement Act, 1943 P.A. 240, as amended, being MCL 38.1; MSA 3.981(1) et. seq. (Act). In pertinent part, Petitioner requests a duty disability retirement under Section 21 of the Act, being MCL 38.21; MSA 3.981(2). Section 21 states in pertinent part: Sec 21. Subject to the provisions of sections 33 and 34, upon the application of a member, or his department head, or the state personnel director, a member who becomes totally incapacitated for duty in the service of the state of Michigan without willful negligence on his part, by reason of a personal injury or disease, which the retirement board finds to have occurred as the natural and proximate result of the said member s actual performance of duty in the service of the state, shall be retired: Provided, The medical advisor after a medical examination of said member shall certify in writing that said member is mentally or physically totally incapacitated for the further performance of duty in the service of the state, and that such incapacity will probably be permanent, and that said member should be retired: And provided further, That the retirement board concurs in the recommendation of the medical advisor. FINDINGS OF FACT
4 Page 4 Based upon the entire record of this matter, including the testimony of Ms. Jones, Respondent Exhibit A, Petitioner Exhibit 1 and 2, and the pleadings in this matter, the following findings of fact were established: 1. Petitioner s date of birth is January 18, Thus, Petitioner will be 43 years old in January See the Transcript (TR) from August 29, 2000, at page (p) Petitioner indicated that she has been a State Employee since January 20, 1980, with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). See the TR at p Petitioner held various positions within MDOT. See the TR at p On July 22, 1994, while working on Interstate Highway 94 in Michigan, Petitioner hurt her back and neck. See the TR at p The July 22, 1994, injury put Petitioner out of work for a period of about two and-a-half years. She received worker s compensation from that accident. She was treated during this time period by different doctors, including Dr. Milcu and Dr. Krinock. See the TR at p The Petitioner testified that she previously applied for a duty disability pension; and, just before the hearing, was told they could accommodate her in a position within MDOT. This was in approximately She was offered a position in the barn or maintenance garage. See the TR at p Petitioner indicated the position she was placed in was the lowest paid position in the garage and that she worked her way up to the highest paid position without
5 Page 5 going into management. See the TR at p Petitioner was placed in a position with a 35 pound weight restriction; but, there were difficulties with this job, and the Petitioner ultimately hurt her back again and also injured her right elbow. See the TR at p Petitioner last worked in November 19, She has been receiving worker s compensation since that date. See the TR at p Petitioner has been working with the Michigan Rehabilitation Services and a specialist named Mr. Dennis Mahoney. She indicated Mr. Mahoney has been unable to find full time jobs for her with the state of Michigan. She has worked some part-time jobs. Petitioner also testified that she is on a 5 pound weight restriction due to the various injuries that she has to her neck, back, and elbow. See the TR at p In June 1999, the Petitioner applied for a duty disability retirement. See Respondent Exhibit A, Section MDOT determined that Ms. Jones was injured on September 29, According to the accident report filed with the Department, Petitioner was placing a garbage bag in the back of the pickup truck when she struck her elbow on the side of the truck bed and injured her right arm/elbow. Before this injury, Ms. Jones was working with medical restrictions from a previous injury. Those restrictions were for no lifting greater than 35 pounds and no repetitive bending or twisting. In addition, MDOT determined that, since Petitioner had been off work, she had developed a bilateral epicondylitis with a current medical restriction of no lifting more than 5 pounds with left arm and no repetitive motion of left elbow. See
6 Page 6 Exhibit A, Section On February 24, 2000, the Office of Retirement Services (ORS) denied Petitioner s application for a duty disability retirement. See Exhibit A, Section On October 5, 1999, Dr. Richard A. Ilka, M.D., performed an examination and review of Petitioner s medical records. See Exhibit A, Section Dr. Ilka, after his review on October 5, 1999, found that Petitioner could return to work because her condition was not totally disabling. See Exhibit A, Section On August 15, 2000, Dr. Ilka wrote to the accident fund of Michigan, the administrator of the state of Michigan s worker s compensation coverage. In his letter, Dr. Ilka recommended that Petitioner be referred to hand surgery specialists for further evaluation and consideration of decompression surgery. See Petitioner Exhibit 2, which contains Dr. Ilka s letter, along with a July 26, 2000, evaluation. 17. Dr. Ilka clearly indicated that Petitioner s disability occurred by reason of a personal injury as the natural an proximate result of her performance on duty. See Exhibit A, Section Dr. Ilka found in effect that all of Petitioner s injuries (her back, neck, and elbow) are injuries that are work related. See Exhibit A, Sections 5.133, 5.135, 5.141, and Dr. Ilka, in his July 26, 2000, evaluation, indicates that Petitioner has pain in her neck and back; but, on any given day, there is no pattern to establish a site of the worst symptoms. He also indicated that on July 26, 2000, he was evaluating both her elbows. See
7 Page 7 Petitioner Exhibit Petitioner s back, neck, and elbow injuries occurred as the natural and proximate result of her actual performance of her duties at MDOT. See Dr. Ilka s reports dated July 26, 2000, and August 15, 2000, which are contained in Petitioner s Exhibit On November 16, 1999, MDOT wrote to ORS. In pertinent part, this letter stated, We are attempting to return Ms. Jones to employment whether it be state service or private industry and have a Vocational Rehabilitation Specialist involved to assist us in this attempt. See Exhibit A, Section During the contested case hearing, Petitioner testified that the Rehabilitation Specialist has been unable to find her a full-time job. See the TR at p Petitioner also testified that, with the 5 pound weight restriction on her elbows and the 35 pound restriction because of her back and neck, there were no state jobs that she had either the training or the physical ability to perform. See the TR at p. 22. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The principles that govern judicial proceedings also apply to administrative hearings, 8 Callaghan s Michigan Pleading and Practice, (2d ed), Section 60.48, p The burden of proof is upon the Petitioner to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she is (1) disabled, and (2) entitled to a duty disability. The record as a whole in this matter has established by a preponderance of the evidence the following conclusions of law: 1. The standard to be applied in this matter is whether, The Plaintiff is
8 Page 8 unable to engage in employment reasonably related to Plaintiff s past experience and training. See Knauss v State Employees Retirement System, 143 Mich App 644; 372 N.W. 2d (1985). 2. In Knauss, the Court concluded that, this court allowed the plaintiff to recover total-disability benefits because the plaintiff was only trained to perform his occupation as an auto mechanic. We are of the opinion that a similar standard should also be applied to state-employee disability benefits. See Knauss at p The evidence in this matter establishes that Ms. Jones can no longer perform her prior duties as a result of the neck, back, and elbow injuries. The record contains no evidence that the Petitioner has the skill, training, or background applicable to another occupation or job. 4. In short, as argued by Petitioner in her post-hearing brief, there is no evidence of any job for the state that the Petitioner has the skill, training, background, or physical capability to perform. 5. As indicated above, the record contains numerous and substantial evidence that Petitioner s back, neck, and elbow injuries are job related. Clearly, her disabilities are related to her duties in the Michigan Department of Transportation. 6. Dr. Ilka clearly indicates that Petitioner s disability did occur by reason of a personal injury as the natural and proximate result of Petitioner s performance of duty. See Exhibit A, Section These same findings were confirmed by Dr. Ilka on another date. See
9 Page 9 Exhibit A, Section The state in effect concedes the issue of duty disability in its post-hearing brief. In pertinent part, it acknowledges, Dr. Ilka s findings are the same as those of other physicians who have seen and/or treated Petitioner through the years. All have indicated that even though she has some impairment, she is not totally disabled from employment. See p. 4 of Respondent s Post-Hearing Brief. 9. The record as a whole in this matter establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the neck, back, and elbow injuries suffered by the Petitioner are duty related. Clearly, the disabilities arose out of Petitioner s duties as an employee of MDOT. 10. In this matter, all of the Petitioner s experience and training are in her various positions within MDOT. These are positions in which she can no longer perform her duties because of her work-related injuries. Clearly, she meets the standard articulated in Knauss. See Knauss at p Thus, it is found and concluded on this record, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Petitioner should receive a duty disability retirement.
10 Page 10 PROPOSED DECISION Based upon the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions of Law, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge proposes that the Petitioner s request for a duty disability retirement be GRANTED. EXCEPTIONS Parties may file exceptions to this Proposal for Decision within 20 days after the Proposal for Decision is issued and entered. A response to the exception may be filed within 15 days after the exceptions are received. Any such exceptions or responses should be filed with the Department of Management and Budget, Office of Retirement Services, 7150 Harris Drive, 3 rd Floor, P.O. Box 30171, Lansing, MI 48909, Attention: Janet Darling. Edward F. Rodgers Administrative Law Judge
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Ned S. Curtis, III, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1025
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Vivian B. Nalu, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1872
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Office of Financial and Insurance Services,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Karen Elizabeth Kloker, LPN, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1592
More informationGeneral Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION GEORGIA R. KATZ ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,068,293 USD 229 ) Self-Insured Respondent ) ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Claimant
More informationSOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND VENUE
SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-04-4583.M2 TWCC MR NO. M2-04-0846-01 FIRST RIO VALLEY MEDICAL, P.A., Petitioner V. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of XXXXX XXXXX, Petitioner v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-407 Agency
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0761 OPINION
RACHEL DAYHUFF, PLAINTIFF, 1998 ACO #682 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0761 WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationYour Rights Under the Missouri Workers Compensation Law
Your Rights Under the Missouri Workers Compensation Law All states have workers compensation laws. The Missouri Workers Compensation Law is contained in Chapter 287 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Human Capital, LLC, Petitioner, v Case No.
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARK RALEIGH ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,039,074 CHECKERS FOODS ) Respondent ) AND ) ) ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY ) OF
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DALE L. STILWELL ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) BOEING COMPANY and ) Docket Nos. 253,800 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY ) & 1,031,180 Respondents
More informationVICKIE RUTH HELMS 1 DOCKET NO. 152,668 BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
VICKIE RUTH HELMS 1 DOCKET NO. 152,668 BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION VICKIE RUTH HELMS Claimant VS. Docket No. 152,668 TOLLIE FREIGHTWAYS, INC. Respondent INSURANCE
More informationNO. COA08-1063 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 June 2009
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationWorkers Compensation and Seniors
Chapter 10 Workers Compensation and Seniors Gregory B. Cairns, Esq. Cairns & Associates, P.C. SYNOPSIS 10-1. Workers Compensation 10-2. Benefits Available 10-3. Filing a Workers Compensation Claim 10-4.
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION KIMBERLY OWEN ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,050,199 MARKIN GROUP ) Respondent ) AND ) ) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY )
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR DISABILTY RETIREMENT
Important: These frequently asked questions provide a general summary of certain features of disability retirement benefits payable from the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System ( SRPS ). SRPS
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0089 OPINION
RICHARD P. BELLANT, PLAINTIFF, 1998 OPINION #328 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #96-0089 STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SELF INSURED, DEFENDANT.
More informationNO. COA06-448 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 February 2007. Appeal by defendant from Opinion and Award dated 16 December 2005 by the Full
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Darrell Blane Manning, LPC, SW, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-1614
More informationPUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A.
PUBLICATION PROVIDED BY: RISSMAN, BARRETT, HURT DONAHUE & McLAIN, P.A. 201 EAST PINE STREET 15 TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 4940 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-4940 TELEPHONE (407) 839-0120 TELECOPIER (407) 841-9726 ORLANDO@RISSMAN.COM
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CARL C. WEBSTER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 233,685 CORBIN FISH FARM ) Respondent ) AND ) ) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE ) Insurance
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT ELIZABETH V. BODINE, Claimant, v. OJCC Case #12-016506DEJ Judge: Doris E. Jenkins Dates of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE January 10, 2002 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE January 10, 2002 Session BIRDIE I. TREECE v. LEAR CORPORATION Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamblen
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BERNICE M. KAYS ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,051,695 PROSOCO, INC. ) Respondent ) AND ) ) INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF ) PENNSYLVANIA
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION RONALD L. MARTENS Claimant VS. BRULEZ FOUNDATION, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,019,265 AND COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INS. CO. Insurance
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARY ROUSH Claimant VS. RENT-A-CENTER, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,062,983 AND HARTFORD INS. CO. OF THE MIDWEST Insurance Carrier
More informationGuide. to Recovery Under The Illinois Workers Compensation Act. The Injured Employee s
The Injured Employee s Guide to Recovery Under The Illinois Workers Compensation Act Prepared By: Romanucci & Blandin, LLC 33 North LaSalle Street, 20th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60602 Toll Free: 888.458.1145
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION WILLIAM G. GUGENHAN ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 162,711 GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION ) Respondent ) Self-Insured ) AND ) ) WORKERS
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. In the Matter of ) ) K L. V ) OAH No. 11-0204-PER ) Div. R&B No. 2011-011
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In the Matter of ) ) K L. V ) OAH No. 11-0204-PER ) Div. R&B No. 2011-011 DECISION I. Introduction K L. V appealed the Public Employees Retirement System
More informationSOAH DOCKET NO. 453-05-2405.M2 TWCC MRD NO. M2-05-0052-01 DECISION AND ORDER I. JURISDICTION, NOTICE, AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
SOAH DOCKET NO. 453-05-2405.M2 TWCC MRD NO. M2-05-0052-01 GREAT AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner V. SHAHID RASHID, M.D. Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-34829 EDW DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-2484; Fax: (517) 373-4147 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-34829
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES POLICY Fauquier County, Virginia
HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY Fauquier County, Virginia Policy Title: Workers Compensation Effective Date: 05/17/04 36 Supersedes Policy: 09/04/90 I. PURPOSE It is the objective of the Board of Supervisors that
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DONALD BRYAN SMITHHISLER Claimant VS. LIFE CARE CENTERS AMERICA, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,014,349 AND OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of John Allen Fuller, C.N.A., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Professions, Respondent / Docket No. 2004-100 Agency
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION TRISTA RAULS ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) PREFERRED RISK INSURANCE SERVICES ) Docket Nos. 1,061,187 Respondent ) & 1,061,188 AND ) ) HANOVER
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION QUANITA A. PEOPLES ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,045,122 LANGLEY/EMPIRE CANDLE COMPANY ) Respondent ) AND ) ) SECURA INSURANCE,
More informationCIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. The Plaintiff, JENNIFER WINDISCH, by and through undersigned counsel, and
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE ( November 30, 2000 Session)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE ( November 30, 2000 Session) ANGELA McCOIN v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and WILSON SPORTING GOODS, INC.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL KNOXVILLE, MAY 1999 SESSION FILED August 27, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk ROBERT JONES CUMBERLAND CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS KC Plaintiff ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 06 CV 1383 ) Defendant Doctor ) ) Defendant. ) PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Plaintiff submits
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION WAYNE M. McKIBBEN Claimant VS. DRY BASEMENT & FOUNDATION SYSTEMS Respondent Docket No. 1,034,394 AND ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE CO.
More informationCOMPENSATION ORDER TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, ) Claimant, ) ) AHD No. 06-094 v. ) OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., ) and ) AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, )
IN THE MATTER OF, TIMOTHY BURROUGHS, Claimant, AHD No. 06-094 v. OWC No. 597835 J & J MAINTENANCE, INC., and AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Employer/Carrier. Appearances REBEKAH ARCH MILLER, ESQUIRE For the Claimant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: ALFRED AND SHARON WHITSON, Debtors. CASE NO. 4:02-bk-20854M CHAPTER 7 ORDER On September 24, 2002, Alfred Eugene
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Advanced Dermatology Associates : (Selective Insurance Company of : America), : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2186 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: May 22, 2015 Workers Compensation
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY PAMELA R. LECOMPTE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) C. A. No. 02A-01-010 JEB CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SYSTEMS, ) ) Respondent. ) Submitted:
More informationDocket No. 2011-50152 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER
IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 Appellant / DECISION
More informationGeorge Allen Moore Moore. Johnston, Moore & Thompson & Thompson. Huntsville, AL AL 35801 35801 (256) 533-5770. www.alabamajusticecenter.
Medical Vocational and Disability and Disability Benefits Benefits What Rights To Medical, To Medical, Vocational, Vocational, And Disability And Benefits Disability Benefits Does an an Injured Injured
More informationPERS Disability Benefits
PERS Disability Benefits (for Tiers I, III, and III) Division of Retirement and Benefits PO Box 110203 Juneau, AK 99811-0203 (907) 465-4460 (800) 821-2251 Welcome to the Division of Retirement and Benefits
More informationFrequently Asked Questions About Georgia Workers Compensation Ty Wilson Attorney At Law 1-866-937-5454 www.tywilsonlaw.
Frequently Asked Questions About Georgia Workers Compensation Ty Wilson Attorney At Law 1-866-937-5454 www.tywilsonlaw.com Special Report Frequently Asked Questions About Claims Special Report Ty Wilson
More informationGuide for Injured Workers
Guide for Injured Workers This is a guide to Oklahoma workers' compensation law and rules. It is based on laws and rules in effect in 2015. Laws and rules can change by acts of the Legislature, rulemaking
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC FILE NO. F708945 STEVE LOWERY, EMPLOYEE GEORGIA-PACIFIC, EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC FILE NO. F708945 STEVE LOWERY, EMPLOYEE GEORGIA-PACIFIC, EMPLOYER SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (TPA), INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2009-34011 SAS Case No. DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHERYL WELLS ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 250,309 RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEMS ) Respondent ) AND ) ) WAUSAU UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-WC-02083-COA HOWARD INDUSTRIES INC. MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALED:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-WC-02083-COA ELSA PEREZ APPELLANT v. HOWARD INDUSTRIES INC. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/27/2013 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION
More informationMcQuiddy, Jana v. Saint Thomas Hospital
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 6-28-2016 McQuiddy, Jana v.
More informationMemorandum. Trial Counsel in Medical Malpractice Cases. John E. Wetsel, Jr., Judge. From: Date: December 11, 2012. Sample Instructions.
Memorandum To: From: Trial Counsel in Medical Malpractice Cases John E. Wetsel, Jr., Judge Date: December 11, 2012 Subject: Sample Instructions ============================== Here is a complete set of
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-39337 EDW 8 DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-39337
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Paterno E. Montayre, PT, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-1564 Agency
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754. JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee. MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754 JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
More informationCORRECTED OPINION/ORDER: CORRECTION IS ON COVER PAGE IN BOLD. 1997 OPINION # 538
CORRECTED OPINION/ORDER: CORRECTION IS ON COVER PAGE IN BOLD. 1997 OPINION # 538 STEVEN M. MARSH, PLAINTIFF, S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V Docket #95-0064 ADAMS
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James Conace, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Armen Cadillac, Inc.), : Nos. 346 & 347 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: September
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 OPINION FILED JULY 20, 2004
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F102457 KEN WATERS, EMPLOYEE CENTURY TUBE CORPORATION, EMPLOYER CROCKETT ADJUSTMENT, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED
More informationWhat You Should Know About Your Workers Compensation Rights. KELLEY & FERRARO Attorneys at Law 888.839.8479
KELLEY & FERRARO Attorneys at Law 888.839.8479 What You Should Know About Your Workers Compensation Rights REGARDING OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES, INCLUDING EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS AND OTHER TOXIC SUBSTANCES Kelley
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION AND ACCIDENT HANDBOOK
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND ACCIDENT HANDBOOK Compliments of Shelley W. Elovitz, Esquire Rothman Gordon, P.C. 310 Grant Street Third Floor, Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 www.rothmangordon.com New Client
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2010-CA-01424-COA MCCOMB NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC VS. MASUMI LEE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ROBERT
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION GARRETT QUINT ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 208,451 VANDEE STUCCO ) Respondent ) AND ) ) AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed
More informationWorkers Compensation Accidents - A Case Law Review
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARVIN T. SMITH Claimant VS. WESTERN FEED MILLS, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,049,751 AND MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INS. CO. Insurance
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION TRACY WRIGHT ) Claimant ) ) VS. ) Docket No. 1,058,254 ) GEAR FOR SPORTS ) Respondent ) ) AND ) ) LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. and
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CATHY L. NEIL ) Claimant ) ) VS. ) ) AMERICA S BEST VALUE INN ) Respondent ) Docket No. 1,056,381 ) AND ) ) MIDWEST INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationHow To Get A Spinal Cord Stimulator
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MICHAEL L. McDONALD Claimant VS. FIBERGLASS SYSTEMS, LP Respondent Docket No. 1,003,977 AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO. Insurance
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2009 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 23, 2009 Session DON R. DILLEHAY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board
Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board OPINION ENTERED: March 25, 2014 CLAIM NO. 201166969 REBECCA MAHAN PETITIONER VS. APPEAL FROM HON. R. SCOTT BORDERS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE PROFESSIONAL
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14275-11 WHSCC Claim No: 837491 Decision Number: 15034 Marlene A. Hickey Chief Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The
More informationDOCKET NO. 453-03-3331.M5 MDR Tracking No. M5-03-0917-01 TEXAS IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE CENTER PETITIONER
DOCKET NO. 453-03-3331.M5 MDR Tracking No. M5-03-0917-01 TEXAS IMAGING AND DIAGNOSTIC BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE CENTER PETITIONER V. OF CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY RESPONDENT ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION
More informationATTORNEY. What A Workers Compensation Lawyer Can Do For You. By Michele S. Lewane, Attorney at Law
MY ATTORNEY What A Workers Compensation Lawyer Can Do For You By Michele S. Lewane, Attorney at Law Michele S. Lewane Injured Workers Law Firm 7826 Shrader Road Richmond, Virginia 23294 (804) 755-7755;
More informationA BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE BENEFITS AND PERILS OF THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE BENEFITS AND PERILS OF THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT If you were injured at work or know a family member or friend who was injured at work, I hope that the following information
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-8066 TRN Case No. 29629449 DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket
More informationT.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-71 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SALVADOR F. NERI AND GUADALUPE NERI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20420-09. Filed March 15, 2012. 1. Held: Ps have failed
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HEARING DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Reg. No.: Issue No.: Case No.: Hearing Date: County: 2009; 4009 August
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MICHELLE JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED November 19, 2015 v No. 323394 Oakland Circuit Court AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE LC No. 2013-137328-NI COMPANY, and Defendant,
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2003. Appeal No. 03-0258 DISTRICT IV
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 25, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION
2008 ACO # 272 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION HEATHER STANG, PLAINTIFF, PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL, INTERVENING PLAINTIFF, V DOCKET #08-0094 TACO BELL CORPORATION AND
More informationFRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION. Applicant Name: JOHN DOE Appointment Date: 01-01-10
FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION REFERRAL FOR INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION Applicant Name: JOHN DOE Appointment Date: 01-01-10 Time: 3:00 p.m. Date Name of Doctor Address Dear Dr.. On
More informationDOCKET NO. 453-04-0995.M5 MDR TRACKING NUMBER: M5-03-2837-01 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' DECISION AND ORDER
DOCKET NO. 453-04-0995.M5 MDR TRACKING NUMBER: M5-03-2837-01 TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner vs. AZALEA ORTHOPEDIC & SPORTS, Respondent BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH, Docket No. 2003-1425 BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT APPELLATE DIVISION ROBERT BUELL ) ) VS. ) W.C.C. 03-00724 ) COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES ) DECISION OF THE APPELLATE
More informationAccident/Incident & Workers Compensation. Packet
Accident/Incident & Workers Compensation Packet Accident/Incident & Workers Compensation Program The following information is to assist you in completing the Accident/Incident & Workers Compensation Program
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION
2009 ACO # 155 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION MARK T. VALESANO, PLAINTIFF, V DOCKET #09-0001 IRON COUNTY, MICHIGAN COUNTIES WORKERS COMPENSATION, AND ACCIDENT FUND
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213395 WILMA L. PIERCE, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 8, 2005
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F213395 WILMA L. PIERCE, EMPLOYEE KROGER, EMPLOYER SELF-INSURED SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT (TPA), INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Kathleen Ann Dils, RN, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1864 Agency
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION AND ACCIDENT HANDBOOK
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND ACCIDENT HANDBOOK Compliments of Shelley W. Elovitz, Esquire Rothman Gordon, P.C. 310 Grant Street Third Floor, Grant Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 www.rothmangordon.com New Client
More informationIN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-53891 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2012-53891
More informationLong Term Disability Insurance
Long Term Disability Insurance Group Insurance for School Employees FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR,FACULTY,LIBRARIAN Underwritten by Connecticut General Life Insurance Company 1475 Kendale Boulevard
More informationDANIEL CROSS (Appellant) LLP TRANSPORT, LLC (Appellee) GREAT FALLS INSURANCE CO. (Insurer)
STATE OF MAINE APPELLATE DIVISION WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD Case No. App. Div. 15-0001 Decision No.15-23 DANIEL CROSS (Appellant) v. LLP TRANSPORT, LLC (Appellee) and GREAT FALLS INSURANCE CO. (Insurer)
More information