Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research Summary of Caravan ORC International National Survey



Similar documents
Genetics, Ethics &Meaning. Module 4

Stem Cells. What Are Stem Cells? Sources for Stem Cells. Stem cells. Medical Ethics 1. Cells able to develop into nearly any other type of cell.

Frances Kamm, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Moral Defense

Guidance For Research Involving Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Germ Cells, And Cells Obtained From Cord Blood

Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Public Opinion and Federal Policy

guides BIOLOGY OF AGING STEM CELLS An introduction to aging science brought to you by the American Federation for Aging Research

I. The Basic Science and Current Context

Ethics Term Paper, Part III. Prepared by Alan Soskel. The ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research will be explored in this paper.

Testimony of. Before The Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education of the Committee on Appropriations United States Senate

34 Stem Cell Research and Applications: Monitoring the Frontiers of Biomedical Research

Debate Motion. This house proposes that the procurement and use of embryonic stem cells for scientific research is unethical. Stem Cell Research

Introducing stem cells Stem cells in the news

Department of Legislative Services

Stem Cell Research. Debate motion

PART I. SECTION 1. The legislature finds that an estimated. 128,000,000 Americans suffer from the crippling economic and

Running head: STEM CELL RESEARCH 1

Stem Cells. Part 1: What is a Stem Cell?

EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH

Values in Conflict: Public Attitudes on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute Johns Hopkins University

NYC Plan B Policy Survey (9/29/2012 Version 3 FINAL) Methods:

15 Stem Cell Research

Marc Welc. Y1 Writes: A Collection of Student Essays 270

The Controversy Over Stem Cell Research

Iowa opens new debate over use of stem cells BY JASON CLAYWORTH JANUARY 16, 2011

Abortion in America. January 2015

YouGov / Daily Telegraph Survey Results

it right? activity (page 4) to highlight ethical issues associated with IVF

Stem Cell Research: Adult or Somatic Stem Cells

THE PROMISE OF STEM CELL RESEARCH

Abortion Viewed in Moral Terms

Stem Cells and Hope for Patients

LIFE: WHAT REALLY MATTERS?

The Ethics of Stem Cell Research and Prenatal Genetic Alteration

Roche Position on Human Stem Cells

The ethical Dilemma About Abortion

Rationale: Revisions enhanced current content by shortening it through deletions of language

Catholics Similar to Mainstream on Abortion, Stem Cells

1436 U Street NW, Suite 301 Washington, DC cfc@catholicsforchoice.org T: (202) F: (202)

Life Now, Or Life Later? : The Promise of Stem Cells. Douglas Affeldt. Shannon Jodoin. Allen MacDonald. Ashley Smith. WRA 110, Sec.

Ethical Considerations For Using Stem Cells

Christian Bioethics. An introduction to reproductive technologies

Playing God? The Ethics of Genetic Manipulation

BIOTECHNOLOGY Vol.XII The Status of the Extracorporeal Embryo (Stem Cells) - H. Nys and B. Hansen

International Policies on Stem Cell Research

Body, Brain and Tissue Donation Pack

07 SB148/FA/1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HEALTH PULSE OF AMERICA February 18 March 8, 2004 HEALTH CARE AND THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

The ethics of stem cell research and treatment

Differentiation = Making specialized cells

MUHLENBERG COLLEGE /MORNING CALL Presidential Tracking Poll

HUMAN STEM CELL RESEARCH

Stem cells possess 2 main characteristics: Sources of pluripotent stem cells: -Long-term self renewal. -The inner cell mass of the blastocyst.

Lesson. Case Study: One Family s Dilemma

New Issues in Stem cells and Regenerative Medicine

Ethical issues in assisted reproductive technologies. Effy Vayena

The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Joel Wiens. November 8, 2001

Ethical issues in stem cell research and application

How To Treat Leukaemia With Cord Blood Stem Cell

06 LC S A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Human stem cell research: a novel technology that will benefit patients Information and Position Paper

Policy statement. Stem cell research

Brochure More information from

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. Human Embryo Research

Whitney Fasbender. The University Of Kansas School of Nursing

DNA Fingerprinting. Unless they are identical twins, individuals have unique DNA

The Types of stem cells: Totipotent Pluripotent Multipotent

The Ethics and Politics of Small Sacrifices in Stem Cell Research Glenn McGee and Arthur Caplan

Briefing on the second reading of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, Monday 19 November 2007.

Obesity in the United States: Public Perceptions

Embryonic Choices. Scientist Toolkit for Public Engagement: Clinical Embryology, Genetics and Haematology

Omnican Report LifeCanada. Canadians Opinion on Abortion

Affordable Care Act Consumer Survey

Areas of Concern. Reproductive Ethics: Issues &

JCI CURRICULUM: UNIT 3: CHAPTER 1 BIO ETHICS LESSON 1: EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH. LESSON 1: EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH (45 mins 1 hour)

X/09/$20.00/0 Endocrine Reviews 30(3): Copyright 2009 by The Endocrine Society doi: /er

An Introduction to Stem Cells

Committee Opinion. Using Preimplantation Embryos for Research* Committee on Ethics. Number 347, November 2006

What are Stem Cells? How can they be used in medicine?

Stem Cell Quick Guide: Stem Cell Basics

tem ells /background /information Stem cell research Copyright 2007 MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research

Stem cell future Those touched by diseases place hopes in research

Ranking Member Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education Subcommittee on Labor-HHS-Education. Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Position on the Private Healthcare System (as of November 2015)

Cord blood banking: information for parents

Logical Fallacies in the Literature on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

HUMAN STEM CELLS AN ETHICAL OVERVIEW

Please visit this site for the current GESCR procedures info:

How To Defend An Embryonic Stem Cell Research

REGULATION OF STEM CELL RESEARCH: A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE UNITED STATES ADOPT THE AUSTRALIAN APPROACH

It s not something you want to think about, but it s something you want to prepare for.

Chapter 16 Reproductive Technology, Gene Therapy, and Stem Cells (modified)

SOYO. North American Council Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America. January 2008

Mississippi Residents Speak Out on Public Health Research

Stem Cell Research and the 2004 Election. Barbara Norrander Department of Political Science University of Arizona. and

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY POLICY ON THE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH WITH HUMAN EMBRYOS AND HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS*

How are polls conducted? by Frank Newport, Lydia Saad, David Moore from Where America Stands, 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10 AT 4 PM

The Egg Donor Gestational Surrogacy Program for Single and/or Gay Males at The Fertility Institutes

your complete stem cell bank

Virginia RANKING: 19

Transcription:

Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research Summary of Caravan ORC International National Survey The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research (CAMR) commissioned Caravan ORC International to conduct a public opinion study on issues surrounding stem cell research. The survey was completed during the period May 10-13, 2001 from ORC s central telephone facilities in Tucson, Arizona and/or Tampa, Florida. The telephone survey was conducted among a national probability sample of 1,010 adults, comprising 506 men and 504 women 18 years of age and older, living in private households in the continental United States. Results of any sample are subject to sampling variation. The magnitude of the variation is measurable and is affected by the number of interviews and the level of percentages expressing the results. For this survey, at a 95 percent confidence level, the results can be considered accurate plus or minus three percent or less. Purpose of Study CAMR commissioned the survey to accomplish the following objectives: Measure initial public support for stem cell research; Test a variety of arguments made by supporters of stem cell research; Test a variety of arguments made by opponents of stem cell research Re-test public support for stem cell research after the positive and negative argumentation had been made; Test whether the respondents favored NIH funding of stem cell research; Test whether the respondents would be more or less likely to support a public official based on the official s support of, or opposition to, NIH funding of stem cell research; Examine differences in levels of support and opposition to stem cell research based on the respondent s self-reported religious affiliation and position on abortion.

Initial Public Attitudes When respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to research on stem cells that come from excess fertilized eggs resulting from in vitro fertilization, 77 percent indicated support, with 14 percent indicating opposition. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Argumentation y Support...41 Support...36 Oppose...6 y Oppose...8 Don t Know...9 Positive Argumentation After the initial measure of public support for stem cell research, five arguments cited by supporters of stem cell research were read to respondents. After each argument was read, respondents were asked whether, based on this argument, they would be extremely likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely, to support stem cell research. The results of the five supporting arguments are as follows: Table 1 Extremely Less Not Too Not At All Stem cell research could be the critical link in finding cures for diabetes, Parkinson s, Alzheimers, cancer, heart disease, spinal cord problems, and arthritis 81 50 31 12 4 8 Federal funding for stem cell research is necessary as it is the way scientists at medical schools and universities across the country can participate in this research 73 30 43 20 8 12 Federal funding would ensure oversight of all stem cell research, including that done by private companies, to ensure the embryos have been voluntarily contributed by couples with informed consent 66 31 35 26 10 16 Celebrity advocates like Christopher Reeve have noted that there are more than 100,000 fertilized eggs that are unused and frozen and are destined to be discarded if not used for research 63 28 35 27 12 15 Many pro-life Members of Congress and community leaders support research into stem cells that come from fertilized eggs 59 22 37 31 12 19 2

Negative Argumentation After the positive argumentation for stem cell research, five arguments cited by opponents of stem cell research were read to respondents. After each argument was read, respondents were asked whether, based on this argument, they would be extremely likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely, to support stem cell research. The results of the five opposing arguments are as follows: Table 2 Less Not Too Not At All Extremely Federal funding for stem cell research on stem cells obtained from fertilized eggs is unnecessary because alternatives for using stem cells from adult tissue are available 34 16 17 55 17 38 Fertilized eggs have the same moral status as human beings and therefore they should not be used for medical research despite the potential health benefits 42 16 26 49 21 28 Federal funding for stem cell research from fertilized eggs is unlawful because existing law prohibits using federal funds in any research that involves the destruction of a fertilized egg 43 19 24 47 19 28 Stem cell research is more similar to abortion than to a scientific issue 44 17 27 45 18 27 The ability to develop new medical treatments does not justify the unethical development of stem cells via the destruction of fertilized eggs 38 17 21 52 20 32 Post-Argumentation Public Attitudes After the positive and negative argumentation a second measure of public attitudes toward stem cell research was taken. When respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to stem cell research based on what they now knew, 70 percent indicated support, with 23 percent indicating opposition. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: y Support...34 Support...35 Oppose...11 y Oppose...12 Don t Know...8 3

Respondents were then asked if they supported or opposed National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research. A total of 69 percent of the respondents favored NIH funding of stem cell research, while 24 percent opposed such funding. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: y Support...32 Support...37 Oppose...11 y Oppose...13 Don t Know...7 Next, respondents were asked if they knew their Member of Congress or Senator supported National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research, would they be more or less likely to support him. A total of 64 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support that public official, while 27 percent would be less likely to support him. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Extremely...19...44 Not Too...13 Not At All...14 Don t Know...10 A similar question was asked regarding President Bush s potential support for NIH funding for stem cell research. A total of 57 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support President Bush knowing he supported such funding, while 34 percent would be less likely to support him. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Extremely...18...39 Not Too...12 Not At All...22 Don t Know...10 4

Results By Religious Affiliation Initial Support For Stem Cell Research As mentioned above, when respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to stem cell research, 77 percent indicated support, with 14 percent indicating opposition. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported religious affiliation are broken out as follows: Table 3 Support 77 75 80 71 91 y Support 41 41 46 31 61 Support 36 35 35 40 31 Oppose 14 17 12 21 0 Oppose 6 7 5 8 0 y Oppose 8 10 7 12 0 Post-Argumentation Support For Stem Cell Research As mentioned above, after the positive and negative argumentation a second measure of public attitudes toward stem cell research was taken. When respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to stem cell research based on what they now knew, 70 percent indicated support, with 23 percent indicating opposition. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Table 4 Support 70 72 71 63 83 y Support 34 31 38 25 61 Support 35 40 33 39 22 Oppose 23 23 22 26 9 Oppose 11 9 11 11 6 y Oppose 12 14 11 15 2 5

Post-Argumentation Support For NIH Funding Of Stem Cell Research Respondents were then asked if they supported or opposed National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research. A total of 69 percent of the respondents favored NIH funding of stem cell research, while 24 percent opposed such funding. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Table 5 Support 69 71 70 70 83 y Support 32 31 35 22 68 Support 37 40 35 48 15 Oppose 24 25 23 23 9 Oppose 11 10 11 5 0 y Oppose 13 15 12 18 9 Post-Argumentation Attitudes Toward Congressional Support Next, respondents were asked if they knew their Member of Congress or Senator supported National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research, would they be more or less likely to support him. A total of 64 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support that public official, while 27 percent would be less likely to support him. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Table 6 More 64 64 62 67 95 Extremely 19 18 21 13 46 44 46 42 54 49 Less 27 28 28 24 2 Not Too 13 11 14 12 0 Not At All 14 17 14 11 2 6

Post-Argumentation Attitudes Toward Presidential Support A similar question was asked regarding President Bush s potential support for NIH funding for stem cell research.. A total of 57 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support President Bush knowing he supported such funding, while 34 percent would be less likely to support him. The intensity of support or opposition can be broken out as follows: Table 7 More 57 57 57 64 68 Extremely 18 17 19 15 20 39 40 38 49 48 Less 34 34 33 29 30 Not Too 12 12 11 14 20 Not At All 22 22 21 15 10 Results By Stance On Abortion Initial Support For Stem Cell Research As mentioned above, when respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to stem cell research, 77 percent indicated support, with 14 percent indicating opposition. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported stance on abortion are broken out as follows: Table 8 y y Support 77 65 80 69 88 86 87 y Support 41 29 30 29 43 58 52 Support 36 37 50 40 45 28 34 Oppose 14 25 15 22 8 8 8 Oppose 6 8 9 9 4 3 3 y Oppose 8 17 6 14 3 5 4 7

Post-Argumentation Support For Stem Cell Research As mentioned above, after the positive and negative argumentation a second measure of public attitudes toward stem cell research was taken. When respondents were asked their levels of support or opposition to stem cell research based on what they now knew, 70 percent indicated support, with 23 percent indicating opposition. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported stance on abortion are broken out as follows: Table 9 y y Support 70 50 73 56 84 82 83 y Support 34 20 23 21 37 52 47 Support 35 30 50 36 47 29 36 Oppose 23 44 20 37 13 13 13 Oppose 11 20 16 18 7 5 6 y Oppose 12 24 4 18 6 8 7 Post-Argumentation Support For NIH Funding Of Stem Cell Research Respondents were then asked if they supported or opposed National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research. A total of 69 percent of the respondents favored NIH funding of stem cell research, while 24 percent opposed such funding. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported stance on abortion are broken out as follows: Table 10 y y Support 69 50 74 57 82 80 81 y Support 32 19 21 19 30 52 44 Support 37 32 53 38 52 28 37 Oppose 24 45 21 38 14 14 14 Oppose 11 18 14 17 8 5 6 y Oppose 13 27 6 21 6 8 8 8

Post-Argumentation Attitudes Toward Congressional Support Next, respondents were asked if they knew their Member of Congress or Senator supported National Institutes of Health funding for stem cell research, would they be more or less likely to support him. A total of 64 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support that public official, while 27 percent would be less likely to support him. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported stance on abortion are broken out as follows: Table 11 y y More 64 50 65 54 76 74 75 Extremely 19 14 14 14 16 30 25 44 37 51 41 61 44 50 Less 27 42 27 38 20 18 19 Not Too 13 16 21 18 12 6 8 Not At All 14 25 7 20 8 11 10 Post-Argumentation Attitudes Toward Presidential Support A similar question was asked regarding President Bush s potential support for NIH funding for stem cell research. A total of 57 percent of the respondents would be more likely to support President Bush knowing he supported such funding, while 34 percent would be less likely to support him. Levels of support or opposition by self-reported stance on abortion are broken out as follows: Table 12 y y More 57 51 65 55 70 56 61 Extremely 18 15 18 16 16 22 20 39 36 46 39 54 34 41 Less 34 43 27 38 26 34 31 Not Too 12 15 11 14 13 10 11 Not At All 22 28 16 24 13 25 20 9