STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE



Similar documents
Utica College Performance Review Form

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

Staff Performance Evaluation

Employee Development Plan

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

The Appraisal Interview

360 Feedback HR Representative - Initiation

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

4a Revalidation: Guidance on Colleague and Patient Questionnaires Annex A. Revalidation: Guidance on Colleague and Patient Questionnaires

Managing Underperformance in the HSE: the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)

CAREER DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Training Needs Assessment Evaluation Form. Personal/Position Information

Staff Performance Review Policy and Procedure

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management

What is a 360 degree appraisal? A short introduction to the process. Contents: Introduction: page.2.

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

Northwestern University

APPLICATION PROCESS FOR HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS TECH PROGRAM GREAT FALLS COLLEGE MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

On-Site Supervisor Handbook

EVALUATION OF MSW STUDENT FIELD WORK FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT

Regulations on Education and Research for PhD Programs

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Planning & Goal Setting

Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR COUNSELING SUPERVISORS

Job Description - Relationship Development Manager Dementia Friends

Construction Management INTERNSHIP MANUAL

LOUISIANA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FACULTY EVALUATION AND PLANNING FORM

Sport, Fitness and Recreation Certificate III in Fitness. Student Work Placement Booklet

Quality Handbook. Part D: Regulations. Section 16E: Professional Doctorate Degrees. Section16E. Nottingham Trent University

POSITION DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE (PDQ)

PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM MANUAL

MPHIL in LAND ECONOMY

Performance Management Process. Department of Human Resources Presented by: Wendy Davis

Envisia Learning 360 Feedback Online Project Flow Process

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.

Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

360 Degree Survey. program staff.

CONDUCTING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS

MANAGING SUPPORT STAFF POOR PERFORMANCE AND ATTENDANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Master of Science in Emergency Management. EMGT 693: Field Experience Practicum. Student Field Experience Practicum Manual

Supervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation 1

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN LAND ECONOMY

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for General Practitioners

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Prepared by the Policy, Performance and Quality Assurance Unit (Adults) Tamsin White

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK MSW PRACTICUM MANUAL

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

GUIDANCE COUNSELOR JD LOCATOR: Adopted:

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

MAEB MEDICAL ASSISTANT EXTERNSHIP BOOKLET

ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)

POSITION DESCRIPTION QUESTIONNAIRE NON-EXEMPT

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare

Elizabethtown College Social Work Department 470 Student Evaluation Fall Semester

PRACTICUM HANDBOOK Community and College Student Development. The College of Education & Human Development UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

Transcription:

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE JOB PERFORMANCE OF: EVALUATION PERIOD: FROM TO DATE: Dear Colleague: The assessment procedure for Support Staff includes evaluations by co- workers and other UFV employees whom the staff person regularly works with. We would very much value your input for this assessment. The purpose of this evaluation is to provide constructive feedback that will assist the employee in his or her personal and professional development. Please complete the attached form by selecting the rating that best describes the employee s performance on each item, as you have observed it. The evaluation scale has five (5) possible ratings: : performance is consistently above acceptable performance levels : performance is occasionally above acceptable performance levels and otherwise meets acceptable performance levels : performance consistently meets acceptable performance levels : performance is occasionally below acceptable performance levels but otherwise meets acceptable performance levels : performance is consistently below acceptable performance levels There is a comments box below each item for you to provide additional detail on your reasons for choosing the rating. If you select Sometimes Unsatisfactory or Unsatisfactory as your rating, you will be required to add information in the comments box before you will be able to fill out the rest of the form. However, we encourage you to add comments for all your ratings if possible. Please select Unable to Rate if you do not feel that you have enough information to rate the staff person s performance on the item. Please select Not Applicable if you feel that the item is not relevant to the job this person performs. For your information, the identity of those submitting completed evaluation forms is not available to the person being evaluated, their supervisor, and the Faculty and Staff Association. If it is necessary to clarify or follow up on any information on a completed form, Employee Services will contact the source of the information. Thank you for contributing to the evaluation process. If you have questions about this form or about the evaluation process, please contact Employee Services. REVISED AUGUST 31, 2011 1 5

JOB PERFORMANCE OF: EVALUATION PERIOD: FROM TO A. JOB DUTIES: 1. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 2. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 3. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 4. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 5. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 6. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 7. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 8. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 9. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] 10. [[Evaluation criteria selected from the employee s job description]] REVISED AUGUST 31, 2011 2 5

JOB PERFORMANCE OF: EVALUATION PERIOD: FROM TO B. JOB PERFORMANCE 1. Arrives for work on time. 2. Arrives for meetings on time. 3. Meets work deadlines. 4. Identifies problems. 5. Proposes solutions to problems. 6. Takes appropriate action on problems as necessary. 7. Sets appropriate priorities for tasks. 8. Uses time effectively. 9. Consults with supervisors and co- workers as necessary. 10. Works without supervision as necessary. REVISED AUGUST 31, 2011 3 5

11. Demonstrates effective leadership skills as appropriate. 12. Demonstrates initiative as appropriate. 13. Effectively collaborates with other department members as necessary. 14. Deals effectively and professionally with employees in other areas. 15. Responds appropriately to feedback on job performance. 16. Demonstrates appropriate knowledge of UFV practices and policies relevant to position. 17. Demonstrates appropriate interactions with students. 18. Demonstrates appropriate interactions with the public. 19. Deals appropriately with confidential information. 20. Deals appropriately with sensitive situations. 21. Manages information and data effectively. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION REVISED AUGUST 31, 2011 4 5

C. ADDITIONAL EVALUATION CRITERION FOR EMPLOYEES WITH SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES: These additional questions will be included in on- line questionnaires for those employees being evaluated who have supervisory responsibilities within the scope of their duties. 22. Gives clear guidance in support of unit objectives. 23. Gives clear guidance in support of daily tasks. 24. Gives recognition for good performance. 25. Offers appropriate assistance to new employees supervised. 26. Is fair to all employees supervised. 27. Is accessible to all employees supervised. 28. Works to establish and maintain a positive relationship with all employees supervised. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION REVISED AUGUST 31, 2011 5 5