Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program



Similar documents
F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

How To Manage A Mass Tort Program

NOTICE TO THE ASBESTOS BAR

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT JUVENILE COURT RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

WESTCHESTER SUPREME COURT DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL PART RULES REVISED EFFECTIVE October 15, 2014

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON DAUPHIN COUNTY LOCAL RULES

BUSINESS COURT PROCEDURES FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

SUPERIOR COURT KENT COUNTY CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT PROCEDURES THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:13-cv AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

JUDGE J. BRIAN JOHNSON LEHIGH COUNTY COURTHOUSE 455 HAMILTON STREET ALLENTOWN, PA Facsimile

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION

LOCAL CIVIL RULES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. (with revisions through January 2012)

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT RULES - for - THE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION of THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Guilford County, North Carolina

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals Appointment of Counsel... 4

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

Compulsory Arbitration

rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE TRIAL COURT STANDING ORDER NO (AMENDED)

YORK COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (2014 Revision) (Effective March 31, 2014)

FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CIVIL DIFFERENTIATED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS FOR CHILDREN IN THE FOURTH DEPARTMENT

Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009

Fairfax County Circuit Court Preferred Criminal Law Practices

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

Debt collection in Russia

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

How To File A Family Law Case In California

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

JUDICIAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS

Hon. Maria S. Vazquez-Doles, J.S.C. Orange County Supreme Court 285 Main Street Goshen, NY Part Rules (Effective September 29, 2014)

CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AGREEMENT

State of Delaware Industrial Accident Board

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

JUSTICE LINDA S. JAMIESON COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULES

United States District Court

Subchapter Court of Appeals

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TRIAL DIVISION. General Court Regulation No.

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Local Rules of the District Courts of Montgomery County, Texas

HON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

RULES OF THE COURT (Effective July 8, 2014)

HOME MORTGAGE MODIFICATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.

Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COLORADO JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NUMBER

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration)

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 14-23

LOCAL BANKRUPTCY FORM (a) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION

Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

FOURTH AMENDED OMNIBUS ORDER ON TRIAL SETTING, DISCOVERY AND PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION IN PERSONAL INJURY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (REVISED NOVEMBER, 2004)

7.010 PLEAS, NEGOTIATIONS, DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES IN CRIMINAL CASES

Case Management Conferences Product Details

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

ORDER I. COURT ADMINISTRATION

PART 3 CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES (Revised) APROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN MAY 2002

FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA/PI-CIR

Exhibit A PROCEDURES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE CONASAUGA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF GEORGIA FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Flagstaff Municipal Court DUI Case Management Plan

Mortgage Modification Mediation Program United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California Forms and Procedures

Personal Injury Litigation

DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE RECOMMENDED CASE HANDLING GUIDELINES FOR INSURERS

PRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES

Transcription:

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program 1

DAY FORWARD/MAJOR JURY PROGRAM The Day Forward/Major Jury Program encompasses all Major Civil Jury cases except Commerce and Mass Tort cases. Day Forward Case Management is the system that has been created to coordinate and schedule these cases for trial. To manage these cases more effectively, judges assigned to this program are divided into teams. Each team is assigned a Court Administrative Officer who acts as the liaison to the Team Leader. The Day Forward/Major Jury program team assignments are set forth below: (Effective January 4, 2010) Program Judicial Team Leader Court Administrative Officer Contact Information Day Forward 2010 Judge Tereshko Felicia Brown Clark 686-3718 231 City Hall Day Forward 2009 Judge Allen Joseph DiRosa 686-3774 535 City Hall Day Forward 2008 Judge Abramson Rachel Postell 686-9530 697 City Hall Day Forward 2007 And Back Judge Manfredi Norma Erickson 686-2606 535 City Hall To ensure effective case management, every case in the Day Forward Program is scheduled for a Case Management Conference before a Case Manager approximately ninety (90) days after its initial filing. Case Management Conferences are conducted in Room 613, City Hall. Any questions regarding the scheduling or rescheduling of a Case Management Conference, should be directed to the Case Management Center. Please do not call the Judge s chambers. The Civil Case Management Conference Center telephone numbers are as follows: CASE MANAGEMENT STAFF TELEPHONE NUMBER Fax Line 215-686-3709 Barbara Koch, Receptionist 215-686-3710 Stanley Thompson, Esq., Director 215-686-3710 Charles Pelletreau, Esq. 215-686-3779 Paul D. Salter, Esq. 215-686-3796 Joan M. Sullivan, Esq. 215-686-3767 2

The Case Management Conference The main objective of the Case Management Conference is to obtain early disclosure of basic information about each case so that it can be managed more effectively. This conference is mandatory; all counsel of record and unrepresented parties must attend. Failure to attend the conference could result in entry of an Order for Rule Returnable to Show Cause why the matter should not be non-prossed or why sanctions should not be imposed. Counsel attending the conference must be knowledgeable about all aspects of the case, including issues relating to service of process, venue, pleadings, discovery, joinder of additional parties, theories of liability, damages, and defenses. In preparation for this conference, all parties must fully complete and submit a Case Management Conference Memorandum. A copy of the Case Management Conference Memorandum is included at the end of this section. Counsel must have enough copies of the memoranda to supply to the Case Manager and all parties at the time of the conference. In personal injury cases, the memorandum must contain, at a minimum, past medical expenses, past wage loss, where applicable, and the amount of monetary damages demanded. 1 Based on this information, the Case Manager prepares a Case Management Order that establishes the schedule for each case. This Case Management Order establishes deadlines for discovery, exchange of expert reports, and for filing of motions. A presumptive month is set for a Settlement Conference, Pretrial Conference, and Trial. These deadlines may not be extended without approval of the Team Leader. The method for obtaining an extension is by the filing of a Motion for Extraordinary Relief, which shall be directed by the Civil Motions Program to the appropriate Team Leader for review and disposition. The motion must be filed before the expiration of the deadline in question. Another important objective of the Case Management Conference is to assign all cases to an appropriate trial track. At the Case Management Conference all cases are classified into one of three management tracks: Expedited, Standard, or Complex. Expedited Track cases are tried within thirteen months after filing; Standard Track cases are tried within nineteen months; Complex Track cases are tried within twenty-five months after filing. See the Time Standards by Track chart included at the end of this section. It is important to note that all deadlines and presumptive dates are based on the commencement of the action, not the date of the Case Management Conference. Disputes regarding the placement of a case on a certain track can also be resolved by filing a Motion for Extraordinary Relief specifically for reconsideration of the assigned track. 1 It is insufficient to indicate in the memorandum that injuries or damages are unknown, to be supplied, or under investigation. A party s position on liability must be stated with sufficient specificity. It is unacceptable to state non-descriptive conclusions such as liability certain, liability clear, or 100% liability. In cases where counsel appear at the Case Management Conference without sufficient knowledge of facts or incomplete memoranda, the Case Manager may adjourn the conference and issue an order compelling the non-complying party to appear before the Judicial Team Leader to enforce compliance. If a determination is made by the Case Manager that the amount in controversy does not exceed $50,000.00 and title to real estate is not at issue, the Case Manager will recommend to the Judicial Team Leader that the matter be transferred to the Compulsory Arbitration program. 3

Optional Proposed Discovery Plan and Pre-Trial Deadlines by Agreement of Parties for Expedited and Standard Track Matters Parties with cases subject to the Expedited and Standard Track time standards in the Major Jury Day Forward Case Management Program will have the option of presenting to the Court for approval mutually agreed upon proposed deadlines for discovery, identification of expert witnesses and submission of expert reports ( discovery plan ), to be incorporated into the Case Management Order. The parties may also propose, by agreement, deadlines for filing pre-trial motions, and projected dates for the settlement conference and pre-trial conference ( pre-trial Court event schedule ), provided that the proposed settlement conference is scheduled at least thirty (30) days prior to the proposed pre-trial conference date, and the proposed pre-trial conference date is scheduled thirty (30) days prior to the trial date. The proposed projected dates must fall on the first Monday of the month. The proposed discovery plans and pre-trial Court event schedules shall be presented to the Civil Case Manager, who shall act on behalf of the Judicial Team Leader, at the time of the scheduled conference. This option is not available to matters subject to the Complex track time standards. General Court Regulation No. 95-2, governing Day Forward procedures for disposition of Major Jury cases, otherwise applies. Notwithstanding any proposed deadlines and projected pre-trial Court event dates, the projected trial date shall be fixed by the Court and may not be altered by the parties. Accordingly, it is expected that cases subject to the Expedited Track will be ready for trial thirteen (13) months from commencement of the action and cases subject to the Standard Track will be ready for trial nineteen (19) months from commencement of the action. Furthermore, the proposed deadlines and projected pre-trial Court event dates shall not in any way conflict with or otherwise cause any Court events, including trial, to be delayed. To facilitate formulation of the discovery plan, counsel for the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) shall meet or confer for an initial discovery conference within sixty (60) days of commencement of the action, where the parties shall cooperate with one another and make a good faith effort to agree upon a proposed discovery plan as well as proposed projected pre-trial Court event dates. If service of the Complaint is not effectuated within sixty (60) days of commencement of the action, the parties shall meet or confer for the initial discovery conference within thirty (30) days of service thereof, provided that the discovery conference is held prior to the scheduled Case Management Conference. The Case Management Conference will not be delayed or rescheduled in the event the parties fail to conduct a discovery conference, present an agreed upon proposed discovery plan, or present an agreed upon proposed pre-trial Court event schedule at the time of the Case Management Conference. All parties, including newly joined parties, shall be 4

bound by the terms of any Court approved deadlines and projected Court event schedules incorporated into a Case Management Order. If the parties are unable to amicably agree upon a proposed discovery plan or projected pre-trial Court event schedule or do not submit a proposal at the time of the Case Management Conference, the Civil Case Manager shall enter a Case Management Order consistent with existing time standards for the presumptive Expedited or Standard Track. The Court will not entertain any proposed discovery plans or proposed pre-trial Court event schedules presented after entry of the Case Management Order. Relief sought from the time requirements of Case Management Orders incorporating agreed upon discovery plans and projected pre-trial Court event schedules must be made by filing a timely Motion for Extraordinary Relief. The Settlement Conference After completion of discovery a mandatory Settlement Conference is held before a Special Judge Pro Tempore. The Judge Pro Tempore is an experienced attorney who will assist counsel in their good faith efforts to reach a voluntary and just resolution of the lawsuit. The Special Judges Pro Tempore work directly under the supervision of the Team Leader, to whom the results of each conference are reported. Should counsel fail to negotiate in good faith or are unprepared at the Settlement Conference, the Special Judge Pro Tempore may issue a Rule to Show Cause before the Team Leader who will address the failure to appropriately participate in the Settlement Conference. Settlement Conferences are conducted at the Dispute Resolution Center, Room 691, City Hall. (See the section on Dispute Resolution Center for more details about the Settlement Conference event.) The Pre-Trial Conference Any case that is not resolved at the Settlement Conference will be scheduled for a Pretrial Conference before the Judicial Team Leader of the respective program. All parties are required to file a detailed Pretrial Memorandum with the Team Leader prior to the scheduled Pretrial Conference. The pretrial memorandum must identify by name and address every witness that will be called at trial; in addition, they must identify, exchange, and pre-mark every exhibit for trial. Only those witnesses and exhibits identified in the Pretrial Memorandum will be permitted at trial. At the Pretrial Conference, counsel are expected to be prepared to discuss all aspects of settlement and trial. Upon conclusion of the Pretrial Conference, a trial date is scheduled and an Order for Trial is entered. Practically speaking, the preparation of a complete, effective pretrial memorandum presupposes that counsel have prepared their case for trial. Thus, the previously scheduled settlement conference, which was heard by the Judge Pro Tempore, is the final opportunity to resolve a case and avoid the necessity of extensive trial 5

preparation. Finally, to maintain consistent oversight of a case, each Team Leader along with the assigned team of judges, will rule upon all motions, including discovery motions, presented with respect to cases assigned to their respective program. The major objective of the Day Forward/Major Jury Program is to provide for timely case disposition, by way of case resolution or, if necessary, timely trial. To this end, for matters proceeding to trial, the Court has adopted a protocol for assigning certain cases to trial pools. A copy of this protocol is reproduced as an accompanying document. The high volume of major jury filings annually (approximately 5,000 cases) precludes the assignment of fixed trial dates to cases other than complex. As a result, all expedited and standard track cases are considered suitable for pool assignment. 6

F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division -- Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ADVICE TO COUNSEL 1. Be sure to fully complete the Case Management Conference Memorandum prior to the Case Management Conference. Consult clients well in advance of the conference to obtain pertinent information to prepare the memorandum. When supplying information on injuries or damages, it is insufficient for plaintiff to state unknown, to be supplied, or under investigation. In stating factual positions as to liability, it is insufficient to use non-descriptive terms, such as liability certain, 100% liability, or clear liability. 2. Bring enough copies of the Case Management Conference Memorandum to supply to all parties at the time of the Conference, as copies may not be made at the Center. Bring an extra copy or two, if possible. 3. Be fully prepared to discuss issues relating to service of process, venue, pleadings, discovery, joinder of additional parties, theories of liability, damages, and applicable defenses. Parties are encouraged to discuss these issues amongst themselves prior to the conference when possible. Participation from fully prepared and cooperative parties leads to a more productive and meaningful conference. 4. Conduct discovery as soon as practicable, even while awaiting disposition of preliminary objections. The presumptive case management discovery deadlines are calculated from the filing date of an action, not from the date of the Case Management Conference. The pendency of Preliminary Objections does not stay discovery. If a formal stay is necessary, the parties should petition the Court accordingly. 5. Consider voluntarily transferring your case to the Compulsory Arbitration Program where appropriate. The Case Managers can generate a Praecipe to Transfer and schedule a hearing date for you. All cases having an amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, of $50,000 and less 7

(except cases involving title to real estate) shall be assigned to the Compulsory Arbitration Program. (See Philadelphia County Rules, Rule *1301) The Judicial Team Leaders may sua sponte remand matters to the Compulsory Arbitration Program accordingly. 6. Be mindful that the Case Management Conference is a mandatory Court proceeding. The Case Managers are empowered by the Judicial Team Leaders to issue appropriate Orders to enforce compliance with program procedures and applicable Rules of Civil Procedure. Any Rule to Show Cause entered will be returnable before the Judical Team Leader. (See Philadelphia County Rules, General Court Regulation No. 95-2) 7. After you leave the Case Management Conference Center, carefully review the entire Case Management Order. Be sure to promptly note all deadlines on your calendaring or tickler system. You will receive notice from the Court of actual Settlement Conference and Pre-trial Conference dates and related instructions in due course. 8. Motions for Extraordinary Relief seeking extension of deadlines must be filed before the expiration of the deadlines at issue. 9. Please direct questions regarding Case Management, including scheduling or rescheduling of Case Management Conferences to the Case Management Conference Center at (215) 686-3710 or through facsimile at (215) 686-3709. Requests to reschedule a conference may be submitted under exigent circumstances only and must be in writing to the Court no later than ten (10) days prior to the conference. Prepared by: Stanley Thompson, Esq. Director 8

2010 TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL PRIORITY OF CIVIL CASES I. COMPLEX CASES (day certain trial date; two cases per team judge listed weekly): 1. Complex Litigation Center Mass Tort Programs 2. Complex Day Forward/Major Jury 2007 3. Complex Day Forward/Major Jury 2008 II. POOL CASES (expedited or standard cases; subject to call on next day notice): 1. Pool Day Forward/Major Jury 2007 2. Pool Day Forward/Major Jury 2008 3. Pool Day Forward/Major Jury 2009 4. Complex Litigation Center Major Non Jury 5. Complex Litigation Center Arbitration Appeal 9