IMPROVING ENGINEERING EDUCATION



Similar documents
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle

Copyright 2014 by ABET. Proposed revisions to ABET Criterion 3 (Student outcomes [a-k]) and Criterion 5 (Curriculum)

International Conference on Tertiary Education (ICTERC 2013) Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh January 2013.

ABET Definition of Design

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS COMMENTARY. For Architectural Engineering Programs Draft of September 2010

Assessment Plans. for. Computer Engineering Programs

Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas

A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES

AC : ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACCREDI- TATION: COMPARING AACSB AND ABET

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT PLAN

Industrial Engineering Definition of Tuning

EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design. Murali Varanasi August 25, 2014

Electronic Engineering Technology Program Exit Examination as an ABET and Self-Assessment Tool

Drafting Program Educational Objectives for Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs

STAGE 1 COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering Continuous Improvement Guide

DEPARTMENTAL PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

Boise State University Department of Construction Management Quality Assessment Report and Action Plan

STAGE 1 COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS COMMENTARY. For Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs Draft of July 2011

UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD

Licensure and Certification: What this Means for the Environmental Engineer?

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING APPLIED SCIENCE PROGRAMS

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Baccalaureate Study in Engineering Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes

1) Chemical Engg. PEOs & POs Programme Educational Objectives

Learning Outcomes Assessment Setting and Measuring Goals

Development and application of a rubric specific for the senior-year Graduation Design Projects for assessing learning outcomes

The College of EMS Strategic Plan can be seen at the college s WEB site

Preparing for an ABET Accreditation Visit: Writing the Self-Study

A Design Paradigm in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Curriculum

Dalhousie School of Health Sciences Halifax, Nova Scotia. Curriculum Framework

Sounding the depths- Assessing Cadet Knowledge of Engineering Ethics

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS

ELEC SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS Spring Semester, 2014 Dr. Dean

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QIP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEGREE PROGRAM

A Quick Overview of Accreditation of Engineering Programs in United States

OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT

ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES TO EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT/ BAGHDAD UNIVERSITY

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING APPLIED SCIENCE PROGRAMS

Assessment Processes. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Fall 2014

AC : DEVELOPING STUDENT DESIGN AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLS IN AN UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM

Program Review and Assessment

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California

EC2000 CRITERION 2: A PROCEDURE FOR CREATING, ASSESSING, AND DOCUMENTING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Outcome Assessment at the U. S. Military Academy

AC : ACCREDITATION OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS

ABET & NCAAA ACCREDITATION Course Design Workshop

Proposed Change to ABET Software Engineering Program Criteria CSAB Criteria Committee, 1 March 2014

2014 New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards - Technology

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

BSEE-EE Electrical Engineering Assessment Plan

Program Review Document Department of Accounting

Tennessee State Board of Education February 1, 2013 First Reading Item: III. A. Teacher Licensure Standards

Nicholas H. Steneck, Barbara M. Olds, Kathryn A. Neeley University of Michigan/Colorado School of Mines/University of Virginia

Mechanical Engineering (BS)

California State Polytechnic University. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ASSESSMENT PLAN. Spring,

Debunking the Myths behind Accreditation (in the global environment)

DEFINING, TEACHING AND ASSESSING LIFELONG LEARNING SKILLS

Writing Student Learning Outcomes for an Academic Program

Assessment of Educational Objectives in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Programs

The mission of the School of Electronic and Computing Systems 3 is to provide:

Unit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs

A. Terms and Definitions Used by ABET

Civil & Environmental Engineering Programs Assessment Process Summary

INTERNAL REGULATIONS FOR THE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS ENGINEERING

International Engineering Alliance. Glossary of Terms Ver 2: 15 September 2011

Department of Engineering Technology Assessment Progress Report Calendar Year 2011 (prepared March 2012)

White Paper on Design in Ceramics, Materials, Metallurgical and Similarly Named Engineering Programs

engineering AND Technology Degree programs

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

Resources for Writing Program Learning Outcomes

Writing Quality Learning Objectives

Mechanical Engineering Technology Assessment Report

Standards for Accreditation of Master's Programs in Library & Information Studies

ABET Criterion 3: Outcomes Met By Course Content

PROGRAM PUBLIC INFORMATION

Resolving ABET/TAC Criteria on Continuous Improvement: Surviving ABET Accreditation!

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Computer Engineering Undergraduate Program (CpE) Assessment report

ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION (CASEE)

M.Tech. Control and Instrumentation Engineering

Social Work Field Education Core Competencies and Practice Behaviors

R470, General Education, Common Course Numbering, Lower-Division Pre- Major Requirements, Transfer of Credits, and Credit by Examination

EML 4551 ETHICS & DESIGN PROJECT ORGANIZATION Fall 2015

9. ACADEMIC QUALITY PLANNING PROCESS AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT

Program Assessment Summary Table 16: Masters in Social Work (MSW)

WHAT IS '''SIGNIFICANT LEARNING"?

WASHBURN UNIVERSITY DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM School of Law (J.D.) & School of Business (M.B.A.)

Achieving Focused Program Outcomes through Centre of Excellence (COE) Approach

Developing Information Literacy for the Maritime Curriculum: Strategy and Pedagogy

CONTENT. King Abdullah II Faculty of Engineering

Graduation Requirements

Software Engineering PEV FAQ Last updated: Aug 6, 2008

Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century

Interactive Qualifying Project Analyzing the Accreditation Venture of the Undergraduate Robotics Engineering Program

ABET: Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs

(Your name and Date) Assessment Questionnaire For the ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM (02/01/2012)

University of the District of Columbia

Engineering 398/English 398 Professional Communication for Engineers Program Overview, Fall 2008

Transcription:

3rd International Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering ICECE 2004, 28-30 December 2004, Dhaka, Bangladesh IMPROVING ENGINEERING EDUCATION Muhammad Harunur Rashid Professor and Director Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of West Florida, 11000 University Parkway Pensacola, Florida 32514-5754, USA e-mail: mrashid@uwf.edu ABSTRACT Engineering employers are demanding that engineering graduates must have certain skills. Each engineering curriculum must provide certain skills and abilities, and fulfill its educational program objectives within the mission and goals of the institution. Each engineering program must also demonstrate that the graduates have achieved certain outcomes. 1. INTRODUCTION With the rapid advancements in technology and changes in the operations of business, the job functions of engineers are also changing. Industries are demanding that engineering graduates must have certain skills. The engineering programs in USA are undergoing through rigorous changes in response to meeting needs of the new century. These changes are mandated by accreditation agency (Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, EAC/ABET) and the accreditation of an engineering program will be judged with respect to defined program outcomes. Each program must have an assessment process for continuous improvement with documented results. Any well thought course required for an engineering degree should be able to contribute towards fulfilling the educational program objectives, which are mandated by the ABET criteria 2000 [1]. 2. CONSTRAINTS If you don't have the latest knowledge and skills, you're the equivalent of the immigrants coming to a new country like USA for the first time. The immigrants, who made the investment to learn how to speak, read and write the country s language, English in USA, fluently got the higher-paying jobs. Those who learned only to speak it got medium-to-low-paying jobs, and those who didn't learn the language at all got manual labor, ditch digging and other low-paying jobs. Technology reinvents itself every six to 12 months, and waits on no one. Those who keep up and constantly seek to expand their horizons in whatever their field will have the best chances of getting ahead, working on their own, and switching careers whenever they choose. We, as human beings, are born with certain limitations. Our memory is limited and we forget things very easily. If we learn and know certain things, our memory of those things decays almost exponentially unless the things are repeated. Thus, it does not matter what we teach, students will either forget or the materials will become obsolete, even be before they graduate. Therefore, we should teach things in such a way to develop student s certain abilities. For example, we can rate the student s knowledge of the subject materials as zero at the start of the class. On the day of final, students should have the highest knowledge of the subject materials and we can rate the student s knowledge as logic 1 at the start of the exam. But, after one or two years, that knowledge would decay almost to logic 0, the same logic value as the start. The logic knowledge pattern can be described as 0 1 0 On the other hand, a student who never attended a class, the logic states of the knowledge can be described as 0 0 0 Then what are the differences between a student who started with 0 knowledge, gained the highest knowledge (logic 1) and then forgot the knowledge (logic 0), and another student who started with 0 knowledge, did not gain any knowledge (logic 0) and no knowledge to forget (logic 0)? 3. NEW KNOWLEDGE Knowledge is the coin of the realm in the 21 st ISBN 984-32-1804-4 1

Century. The New Economy needs to compete with well-educated people and the jobs will go where the smart people are. Already, the competition is being won or lost based on new forms of capital, which are knowledge based. The principle resource driving the knowledge economy is the information: such as what we are looking for, where is the information, how we can find it, and how we can apply it for our benefits and the economy. The principle types of knowledge capital are (a) human capital and (b) intelligent capital. 4. HUMAN AND INTELLIGENT CAPITAL The human capital is well-educated, smart people, regardless of academic discipline. Engineers, scientists and mathematicians are necessary, but they not sufficient. Human capital is renewable through continuous learning and this ability must be an integral part of a sustained economy for continual the use of the human capital. The Intelligent capital, which is the product of research, produces intellectual property, knowledge and ideas. It is infinitely divisible. It is expandable and renewable through innovation and research. The Southern Governor s Association Advisory Committee on Research, Development and Technology in USA has made the following policy statement [2] Our national economies are changing. We live in a new, knowledge-based economy, an economy where human capital - brainpower drives economic activity. Education and investment in a highly skilled workforce that can respond to the demands of the New Economy are more important. 5. ENGINEERING ATTRIBUTES The Knowledge economy will have an impact on engineering and creates challenges and opportunities. It creates a global market place that will require averaging knowledge around the world through standardized quality engineering education and sharing of knowledge. It has created global opportunity and challenges for engineering education and for advancing quality of life worldwide participation by all nations/societies. Some of the desired attributes of an engineer [3] in the global marketplace in the new knowledge economy are as follows: Good understanding of engineering fundamentals and design/manufacturing processes. Multidisciplinary, systems perspective. Basic understanding of context engineering is practiced in. Good communication skills. High ethical standards. Ability to think critically/creatively, independently/cooperatively. Curiosity and desire to learn for life. Profound understanding of importance of teamwork. The engineering education must adapt to the changing world and to the new forms of engineering. It must also accept new quality educational standards that are acceptable by industries around the world so that engineers can practice in the knowledge economy and are transferable to anywhere in the global market place with minimum amount of difficulties. 6. ABET PROGRAM OBJECTIVES Each engineering program for which an institution seeks accreditation or re-accreditation [3] must have in place: Detailed published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and these criteria. A process based on the needs of the program's various constituencies in which the objectives are determined and periodically evaluated A curriculum and processes that ensure the achievement of these objectives A system of ongoing evaluation that demonstrates achievement of these objectives and uses the results to improve the effectiveness of the program The process for determining the program objectives, outcomes, implementing the curriculum, and assessment and feedback form continuous improvements is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Two Loops of EC-2000 2

7. ABET PROGRAM OUTCOMES Each engineering program must have an assessment process with documented results. Each program curriculum must provide certain skills and fulfill the educational program objectives within the mission and goals of the institution. Each program must demonstrate that the graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering [6] (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs [6] (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulates, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modem engineering tools necessary for engineering practice [7]. The objectives and outcomes of a specific engineering program must be consistent with the ABET criteria within the mission and goals of the institution. Table 1 shows the cognitive level in relation to the student s learning abilities. Table 1: Achievement of Bloom s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in Cognitive Domain [4] Cognitive Educational Learning Ability Level Objectives # 1 Knowledge List, recite # 2 Comprehension Explain, paraphrase # 3 Application Calculate, solve, determine # 4 Analysis Classify, predict, model, derive, interpret # 5 Synthesis Propose, create, invent, design, improve # 6 Evaluation Judge, select, critique, justify, optimize 8. SPECIALTY REQUIREMENTS The ABET outcomes are not specific to any engineering discipline and all engineering graduates must demonstrate those skills. Also, the graduates must have some knowledge specific to the engineering discipline such as civil, electrical and mechanical engineering, etc. 9. ABET CURRICULUM REQUIREMENTS Students must be prepared for engineering practice through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political. The curriculum must incorporate professional components in subject areas appropriate to engineering, which must include (a) one year of a combination of college level mathematics and basic sciences (some with experimental experience) appropriate to the discipline (b) one and one-half years of engineering topics, consisting of engineering sciences and engineering design appropriate to the student's field of study. (c) a general education component that complements the technical contents of the curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives. 10. ENGINEERING DESIGN Engineering systems are becoming increasingly more complex. Thus, it is highly desirable that engineers have skills for the analysis, synthesis and design of such complex systems. A design in general transforms specifications into practical systems that satisfy those specifications. It involves many variables, and is challenging. One can approach differently to implement the same specifications, and hence many decisions must be made to achieve the specifications In practical designs, most challenging tasks are attacked first, then the simple tasks are handled, because if an acceptable solution to the difficult problems cannot be found, then the product 3

development fails, and the time and money spent on easier problems are wasted. Thus, the hierarchy of engineering design process is: systems, functional block diagrams, implementations, and devices or components. The systems level design is conceptualized and expressed in terms of general specifications of functional blocks and systems integration. The design steps begin with the design descriptions, the functional descriptions, and the model/simulation descriptions. The design process is not unique and the details will depend upon the type of systems utilized. The design process may be viewed as to 1. Identify needs 2. Generate ideas for meeting the needs 3. Refine the ideas 4. Analyze with all possible solutions 5. Decide on the action to be taken 6. Develop methods to implement the ideas. The word 'design' has different meanings to different people in different professions. Design performed by engineers is called engineering design. If one asks different engineers, one would probably end up with different definitions of design. Then, what is engineering design? The ABET criteria [1,5] defines design in a broader scope as follows "Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process (often iterative), in which the basic sciences and mathematics, and engineering sciences are applied to convert resources optimally to meet a stated objective. Among the fundamental elements of the design process are the establishment of objectives and criteria, synthesis, analysis, construction, testing, and evaluation. The engineering design component of a curriculum must include most of the following features: development of student creativity, use of openended problems, development and use of design theory and methodology, formulation of design problem statements and specifications, consideration of alternative solutions, feasibility considerations, production processes, concurrent engineering design, and detailed system descriptions. Further, it is essential to include a variety of realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact." 11. GENERAL EDUCATION The general education component is an integral part of an engineering program and it should be designed to develop and blend the human and social skills within the engineering concepts and fundamental principles. The general education should include only non-skill courses on human and social issues. For example courses such as English language (except literatures), accountancy and project management are not considered as general education although they may be useful for the profession. Many curriculum planers neither realize nor appreciate the importance of general education. Without human and social skills, an engineer may become like a robot which is not desirable. Many professionals including engineers lack social and human skills to interact with other people of different social, ethical, political, religious beliefs, gender issues, sexual-orientations, racial and cultural backgrounds. 12. DEFINITIONS Goals: Broad statements of desired learning outcomes (ABET educational objectives ) Objectives: Statements of observable student s actions that will demonstrate attainment of goals and outcomes (ABET learning objectives ) Outcomes: Statements of knowledge, skills and attitudes students will have that serve as evidence of achievement of goals (ABET EC2000 3a-3k) 13. CONCLUSION The New Economy that is based on knowledge is poised for both challenges and opportunities for universities around the world. The distance leaning is a reality and plays a major role in breaking the physical boundaries for delivering courses, sharing knowledge and the management of knowledge. Engineering plays a leading role for shaping the future technology and the engineering know-how. The engineering graduates must be well prepared in the changing global competitive knowledge-based market. Like all of us in the real world, the engineering graduates must have the ability for knowledge management such Ability to access the knowledge. Ability to locate the knowledge source. Ability to acquire and comprehend the knowledge. Ability to apply the knowledge in practical use. 4

Ability to expand the knowledge into new knowledge and ideas leading to new innovation. Ability to share and communicate the knowledge. It appears that the duration of engineering education should be increased beyond four years to teach the vast amount of technical development and materials. Why? It does not matter what we teach? Most course materials are likely to be obsolete in few years, even before the students graduate from a degree program. Then, why teach more? Rather, we should teach smart and provide students with the necessary knowledge and skills to survive in the New Knowledge based-economy. The effectiveness of any curriculum depends on the actual delivery of the courses within the curriculum. What are the course materials, what are being taught and how effective the teaching, how much of these materials are being understood by the students, who and how do you asses the effectiveness of learning? The key person for implementing an effective process for a quality education is the instructor/faculty. The faculty is the heart of any curriculum. REFERENCES 1. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (EAC/ABET), 2004. http://www.abet.org/ 2. John A. White, Defining the Knowledge Economy, ABET Annual Meeting, Incline Valley, Nevada, November 1, 2001. 3. David O Swain, Global Corporations Leveraging Knowledge, ABET Annual Meeting, Incline Valley, Nevada, November 1, 2001. 4. R. Felder & R. Brent, Designing and Redesigning Courses to Address EC2000, NCSU, 2001 5. Rashid, M.H. 1999, Microelectronics Circuits - Analysis and Design, PWS Publishing, Boston, MA, USA, Chapter 1. 6. M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics - Circuits, Devices and Applications. Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 3/e, 2003. 7. M. H. Rashid, Introduction to PSpice Using OrCAD for Circuits and Electronics. Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 3/3, 2003. 5