Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey



Similar documents
Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey

Spring 2015 Sexual Harassment Survey Results

Executive Summary. How extensive is sexual harassment, stalking, and intimate partner violence?

UWM Counseling and Consultation Services Intake Form

Claremont Colleges Sexual Assault and Campus Climate Survey Findings

Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct

Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium (HEDS) Sexual Assault Campus Climate Survey

Violent Victimization of College Students,

Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct

UW Madison Association of American Universities. Sexual Assault Climate Survey Task Force Report. September 21, 2015

September 2015 Harvard specific supplement to the AAU campus survey report. Office of Institutional Research Harvard University

Violence in the Workplace, Detis T. Duhart, Ph.D. BJS Statistician

In 2014, U.S. residents age 12 or older experienced

Total Males Females (0.4) (1.6) Didn't believe entitled or eligible 13.0 (0.3) Did not know how to apply for benefits 3.4 (0.

Survey Results: 2014 Community Attitudes on Sexual Assault

For the 10-year aggregate period , domestic violence

Monterey County Behavioral Health 2013 Satisfaction Survey Outcomes

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY: HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY TITLE: Sexual Misconduct

BARNARD COLLEGE SEXUAL VIOLENCE RESOURCES

2:30:57 PM]

Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct

CLERY ACT CAMPUS SECURITY

Policy on Sexual Assault, Stalking, Dating Violence, and Domestic Violence

Pre-Test About Sexual Assault

Intimate Partner Violence

Relationship to Victim. Mailing Address City/State/Zip. SSN Date of Birth. Home Telephone Cell phone Other. address

I N F O R M A T I O N B U L L E T I N. Considerations for Sexual Assault Coordination

InSPIRE Performance Measures Spring 2015

APPLICATION FOR STUDENT EMPLOYMENT

*****THIS FORM IS NOT A PROTECTIVE ORDER APPLICATION OR A PROTECTIVE ORDER*****

Topline Report. Prepared for: June 9, Knowledge Networks, Inc.

Childcare: Eldercare: Not a Concern Somewhat Important Important Very Important. Additional Comments:

Assessing capacity to consent and to give evidence

*****THIS FORM IS NOT A PROTECTIVE ORDER APPLICATION OR A PROTECTIVE ORDER*****

In 2009, approximately 572,000 nonfatal violent crimes

How To Answer A Test For A Welfare Check (For Seniors)

APPENDIX B. ASSESSMENT OF RISK POSED TO CHILDREN BY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Anne L. Ganley, Ph.D.

Sexual Assault Prevalence in Texas 1

Macalester Health & Wellness Center Counseling Services Page 1 Intake Data Sheet

FSSE-G 2015 Respondent Profile NSSEville State University

Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour Based Violence (DASH, 2009) Risk Identification and Assessment and Management Model

Victim Information. Other Information. How did you find out about the CVCP? Check the box that applies: Police/Law Enforcement

Checklist for Campus Sexual Misconduct Policies

FSSE-G 2015 Respondent Profile Missouri State University

General Membership Handbook

For the period , females ages 18 to 24 had the

What is Domestic Violence?

WHITTIER COLLEGE. Application for Admission Teacher Credential Program. Department of Education & Child Development

Northern New Mexico College DRAFT

WHAT IS PTSD? A HANDOUT FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR PTSD BY JESSICA HAMBLEN, PHD

YOU THINK IT DOESN T HAPPEN TO MEN?

PREA COMPLIANCE AUDIT INSTRUMENT INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR SPECIALIZED STAFF. Community Confinement Facilities August 11, 2014

During the period from 2006 to 2010, 52% of all

In 2013, U.S. residents age 12 or older experienced

o Please include me on the ACCBO List

SEXUAL ASSAULT. REPORTING A SEXUAL ASSAULT If you are a victim of sexual assault:

How To Study The Difficulty Of Psy 217

Frequently Asked Questions: Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect in the University System of Maryland

CAHPS Survey for ACOs Participating in Medicare Initiatives 2014 Medicare Provider Satisfaction Survey

University of Illinois at Chicago Student Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Violence Interim Policy

I. Dual Credit General Information and Checklist

CAMPUS SECURITY INFORMATION ANNUAL CAMPUS SECURITY REPORT-TULSA

Nursing / Clinical Care Management Departments

Rush Center Statewide LGBT Community Survey Results Prepared for Georgia Equality and The Health initiative by the Shapiro Group

Sample Language and Definitions of Prohibited Conduct for a School s Sexual Misconduct Policy

Community Perception Survey

Christobel Deliwe Chakwana

Irvine Police Victim Advocate s Office

Technical Report # Submitted by: Danna Moore, Ph.D. Arina Gertseva, Ph.D.

WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE

Application Checklist

THE EFFECTS OF FAMILY VIOLENCE ON CHILDREN. Where Does It Hurt?

College of Education. Bachelor of Science Psychology Major and Comprehensive Psychology Program

READINESS. htp:/apps.bexar.org/electionsearch/electionsearch.aspx?psearchtab=3

Abuse in Same-Sex Relationships

Data The estimates presented in the tables originate from the 2013 SCS to the NCVS. The SCS collects information about student and school

Ohio Victims of Crime Compensation Program Application for Crime Victim Compensation

Neighborhood Checkup

Sexual Assault of a Child VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Sexual Harassment Awareness

REVISED E-Health Patient Screening Survey

CREDIT CARD / DEBT STRESS STUDY. * = less than 1% - = question not asked/zero respondents Q6. DO YOU (AND YOUR SPOUSE/PARTNER) HAVE ANY CREDIT CARDS?

Opinion Poll. Missouri Small Businesses Support Workplace Nondiscrimination Policies. June 4, 2013

How To Get Into Lancaster College

Ohio Victims of Crime Compensation Program

Personal Injury Questionnaire

What Employers Need to Know to Help

How to Respond to Employees Facing. Domestic Violence. A Workplace Handbook for Managers, Supervisors, and Co-Workers

Sexual Assault of People in Aged Care Settings: Towards a Better Understanding and Response

PATIENT INFORMATION INTAKE F O R M BESSMER CHIROPRACTIC P. C.

How To Write A File In A Wordpress Program

PART THREE: TEMPLATE POLICY ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND THE WORKPLACE

Moravian College Department of Campus Safety & Police Campus Security Authority Reporting Form. Date of report: Name of campus security authority:

Boston Area Health Education Center

ATTORNEY APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT DIVISION OF LAW DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY STATE OF NEW JERSEY

2010 Penn State Student Satisfaction Survey

SEXUAL ASSAULT POLICY

Survey of Program Training Needs (TCU PTN) Staff Version (TCU PTN-S)

INSIGHT REPORT Winter Sexual Victimization and Social Norms on the College Campus

Campus Crime Awareness

Transcription:

Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey Characteristic Category Weighted Un-weighted Number % Number % Age 18 years old 759 3.0 228 3.4 19 years old 1,462 5.7 400 6.0 20 years old 1,474 5.8 387 5.8 21 years old 1,793 7.0 445 6.6 22 years old 1,977 7.7 553 8.2 23 years old 2,126 8.3 667 9.9 24 years old 2,072 8.1 621 9.2 25 years or older 13,959 54.5 3,417 50.9 Student Affiliation 8,053 31.4 2,060 30.7 17,569 68.6 4,658 69.3 Year in school/program Freshman 1,510 5.9 458 6.8 Sophomore 1,734 6.8 457 6.8 Junior 2,166 8.5 540 8.0 Senior 2,643 10.3 605 9.0 Prof 1st year 7,447 29.1 2,294 34.1 Prof 2nd year 4,372 17.1 1,366 20.3 Prof 3rd year 2,851 11.1 448 6.7 Prof 4th year or higher 2,899 11.3 550 8.2 Year first enrolled in the college or university 2010 or earlier 2,527 9.9 581 8.6 2011 3,009 11.7 606 9.0 2012 4,286 16.7 858 12.8 2013 5,826 22.7 1,683 25.1 2014 or 2015 9,974 38.9 2,990 44.5 Hispanic or Latino? Yes 2,850 11.1 702 10.4 No 22,772 88.9 6,016 89.6

Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey (continued) Characteristic Category Weighted Un-weighted Number % Number % Race White only 13,368 52.2 3,867 57.6 Black only 1,671 6.5 383 5.7 Asian only 8,816 34.4 2,053 30.6 Other/Multi race 1,768 6.9 415 6.2 Gender Identity Female 12,872 50.2 3,980 59.2 Male 12,435 48.5 2,655 39.5 Other 316 1.2 83 1.2 Sexual Orientation Heterosexual 21,548 86.0 5,663 86.1 Non-Heterosexual 3,522 14.0 916 13.9 Since enrolled in college or university, have you been in a partnered relationship? Yes 19,927 77.8 5,203 77.4 No 5,654 22.1 1,506 22.4 Did not answer the question 41 0.2 9 0.1 Have a disability registered with the university? Yes 842 3.3 234 3.5 No 24,741 96.6 6,475 96.4 Did not answer the question 38 0.1 9 0.1

Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all 1.8 0.2 1.7 0.3 1.7 0.2 1.5 0.4 1.9 0.3 A little 8.3 0.3 10.2 0.8 10.9 0.5 5.6 0.6 5.9 0.5 Somewhat 34.2 0.5 40.2 1.2 36.7 0.7 27.8 1.3 31.3 0.8 Very 43.3 0.6 38.5 1.2 41.2 0.7 47.1 1.5 46.6 1.0 Extremely 12.4 0.4 9.4 0.7 9.5 0.4 18.0 1.2 14.3 0.6 The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all 8.1 0.3 4.0 0.5 5.1 0.4 13.5 1.1 10.7 0.6 A little 25.0 0.5 20.9 1.1 21.3 0.8 29.3 1.3 29.3 0.9 Somewhat 43.0 0.6 42.2 1.4 46.4 0.8 38.7 1.4 42.1 1.0 Very 18.7 0.4 25.1 1.1 21.9 0.7 14.0 1.2 14.4 0.8 Extremely 5.1 0.3 7.7 0.7 5.3 0.3 4.5 0.7 3.5 0.4 Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all 6.6 0.3 8.4 0.7 7.1 0.4 6.0 0.7 5.4 0.6 A little 16.1 0.4 25.2 1.3 18.7 0.8 11.5 0.9 11.1 0.6 Somewhat 31.1 0.5 35.5 1.4 35.4 0.9 28.5 1.3 25.8 0.9 Very 29.5 0.5 23.1 1.1 28.5 0.8 31.1 1.5 33.4 1.0 Extremely 16.6 0.4 7.8 0.6 10.4 0.6 22.9 1.1 24.3 0.9

Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Campus officials would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all 8.2 0.3 11.9 0.7 9.4 0.5 5.8 0.7 6.0 0.6 A little 17.8 0.4 25.8 1.2 21.1 0.7 12.8 1.0 12.8 0.6 Somewhat 32.6 0.5 34.8 1.5 35.6 0.8 29.6 1.2 29.8 0.9 Very 27.9 0.5 21.3 1.1 25.2 0.8 31.2 1.4 32.6 1.1 Extremely 13.6 0.4 6.1 0.6 8.7 0.5 20.7 1.1 18.8 0.8 Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all 11.4 0.3 15.1 0.9 11.3 0.6 10.7 0.9 9.6 0.7 A little 20.2 0.4 28.2 1.2 22.2 0.9 17.1 1.0 15.5 0.7 Somewhat 36.9 0.4 38.6 1.1 38.9 0.9 36.9 1.3 34.6 0.9 Very 23.1 0.4 14.6 1.0 21.9 0.7 23.5 1.4 28.6 0.9 Extremely 8.4 0.3 3.5 0.4 5.7 0.4 11.8 1.0 11.8 0.7 Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all 13.7 0.4 20.8 1.1 16.0 0.6 10.4 0.9 9.4 0.6 A little 24.8 0.5 34.7 1.2 28.5 0.9 20.8 1.3 17.9 0.9 Somewhat 35.9 0.6 33.0 1.3 36.0 0.8 39.7 1.6 35.4 1.0 Very 18.4 0.5 9.1 0.8 15.4 0.6 18.5 1.3 26.1 0.9 Extremely 7.3 0.3 2.4 0.3 4.1 0.3 10.7 0.8 11.2 0.7 Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all 14.8 0.4 20.1 1.1 16.4 0.8 12.3 0.8 11.2 0.6 A little 23.7 0.6 28.3 1.2 25.7 0.8 22.1 1.1 20.1 0.9 Somewhat 33.7 0.7 33.1 1.2 35.4 1.0 34.6 1.4 32.0 0.9 Very 20.3 0.5 14.3 1.0 18.0 0.7 19.5 1.0 26.3 0.8 Extremely 7.5 0.3 4.3 0.5 4.5 0.4 11.4 1.0 10.4 0.6

Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all s s 12.1 5.1 A little 13.9 5.0 10.0 4.5 Somewhat 50.0 7.6 38.3 6.2 Very 24.3 6.9 27.0 6.1 Extremely 9.0 4.3 12.6 4.7 The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all 10.7 4.4 6.8 3.4 A little 13.2 5.2 7.1 3.4 Somewhat 40.0 7.7 32.9 7.7 Very 21.1 5.3 32.5 6.8 Extremely 15.1 4.9 20.7 6.7 Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all 12.1 4.4 7.9 3.4 A little 28.3 6.3 25.0 6.4 Somewhat 30.7 7.3 39.7 7.2 Very 19.9 5.3 8.5 3.6 Extremely 9.0 4.4 18.9 5.1

Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Campus official would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all 16.4 4.7 16.1 6.4 A little 23.6 6.2 27.3 6.9 Somewhat 35.9 6.6 26.6 6.6 Very 17.7 5.2 14.2 4.8 Extremely s s 15.9 5.3 Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all 27.0 6.8 27.0 6.4 A little 34.1 7.5 32.2 6.7 Somewhat 24.4 5.8 17.8 5.3 Very s s 10.0 4.2 Extremely 9.2 4.3 13.0 4.9 Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all 20.6 5.3 22.4 5.8 A little 33.2 6.6 31.2 8.0 Somewhat 35.3 6.5 25.1 6.8 Very s s 11.5 4.4 Extremely s s 9.8 4.2 Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all 43.3 6.4 32.0 6.9 A little 21.0 5.8 26.0 6.9 Somewhat 27.5 7.2 23.8 6.8 Very s s 7.0 3.5 Extremely s s 11.2 4.4 1 Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) Have you been in any of the following situations? (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes 14.7 0.4 32.2 1.0 10.8 0.6 19.6 1.2 7.8 0.6 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do 11.8 1.2 12.3 1.5 11.6 2.1 12.2 2.4 11.2 3.4 Did nothing for another reason 21.9 1.1 17.6 1.7 19.0 2.0 28.5 2.8 28.6 3.5 Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help 57.9 1.3 61.5 2.4 63.7 2.3 52.5 3.2 48.7 4.0 Took action in another way 8.3 0.8 8.6 1.3 5.7 1.1 6.8 1.5 11.5 3.4 No 85.3 0.4 67.8 1.0 89.2 0.6 80.4 1.2 92.2 0.6 Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes 35.6 0.5 56.4 1.1 25.7 0.8 53.3 1.7 28.3 1.0 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do 20.7 0.8 24.0 1.6 22.2 1.6 21.3 2.0 16.3 1.6 Did nothing for another reason 59.1 0.9 47.9 1.8 58.3 1.6 60.4 2.2 69.3 2.1 Directly intervened to stop it 7.5 0.5 11.1 1.1 6.3 1.0 7.2 1.2 5.2 0.9 Spoke to someone else to seek help 5.1 0.4 10.3 1.2 3.9 0.6 4.0 0.9 2.3 0.6 Took action in another way 7.7 0.5 6.7 0.8 9.3 0.9 7.1 1.1 7.0 1.0 No 64.4 0.5 43.6 1.1 74.3 0.8 46.7 1.7 71.7 1.0

Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Witnessed someone acting in sexually violent or harassing manner Yes 17.3 0.4 31.9 1.0 15.5 0.7 22.6 1.0 9.5 0.7 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do 22.8 1.3 25.8 2.2 21.2 1.9 26.2 2.7 17.4 2.8 Did nothing for another reason 34.6 1.2 30.3 1.9 35.7 2.5 33.8 2.8 42.0 3.8 Directly intervened to stop it 13.8 0.8 15.4 1.5 11.2 1.6 14.5 2.6 13.4 2.3 Spoke to someone else to seek help 15.2 1.0 18.9 2.1 17.4 1.7 10.3 1.9 11.9 2.2 Took action in another way 13.6 0.8 9.6 1.3 14.4 1.5 15.2 2.3 15.4 2.3 No 82.7 0.4 68.1 1.0 84.5 0.7 77.4 1.0 90.5 0.7

Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Have you been in any of the following situations? If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes 45.0 8.3 23.1 7.0 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do s s s s Did nothing for another reason - - 23.2 13.7 Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help 68.6 10.3 46.0 22.8 Took action in another way 21.4 8.9 23.2 12.8 No 55.0 8.3 76.9 7.0 Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes 40.6 6.3 27.7 6.5 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do 17.2 8.7 s s Did nothing for another reason 38.7 13.5 59.1 14.8 Directly intervened to stop it 25.9 11.0 - - Spoke to someone else to seek help s s s s Took action in another way s s 30.1 13.1 No 59.4 6.3 72.3 6.5

Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Witnessed someone acting in sexually violent or harassing manner Yes 49.2 7.7 15.9 5.3 Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do 16.2 7.6 s s Did nothing for another reason 15.7 7.5 s s Directly intervened to stop it 30.8 10.8 s s Spoke to someone else to seek help s s s s Took action in another way 27.5 8.9 s s No 50.8 7.7 84.1 5.3 1 Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

Table 1.3. Perceptions Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Sexual assault or sexual misconduct a problem at university Not at all 17.2 0.5 6.2 0.8 15.1 0.7 14.7 1.2 26.0 0.9 A little 24.5 0.5 15.5 0.7 23.4 0.8 26.6 1.3 29.3 1.0 Somewhat 35.4 0.5 40.1 1.2 37.5 0.8 36.8 1.5 30.4 1.0 Very 16.8 0.4 27.5 1.1 18.1 0.6 15.0 1.2 11.2 0.7 Extremely 6.1 0.3 10.8 0.7 6.0 0.5 6.8 0.8 3.1 0.4 Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct on campus Not at all 55.8 0.5 26.9 1.2 40.6 1.0 69.7 1.3 79.9 1.0 A little 28.5 0.4 36.4 1.3 39.6 0.9 22.2 1.3 16.1 0.8 Somewhat 11.4 0.3 25.0 1.2 15.4 0.7 6.3 0.8 2.6 0.4 Very 2.8 0.2 7.9 0.7 3.1 0.3 1.4 0.4 0.7 0.2 Extremely 1.4 0.1 3.8 0.5 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct off campus at university-sponsored events Not at all 48.6 0.5 23.2 1.1 31.8 0.8 66.0 1.2 70.9 1.1 A little 32.7 0.5 42.1 1.3 41.7 1.0 25.0 1.2 22.4 1.0 Somewhat 14.8 0.4 26.4 1.2 21.2 0.6 7.2 0.7 5.8 0.6 Very 3.0 0.2 6.2 0.6 4.4 0.4 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 Extremely 0.9 0.1 2.2 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.1

Table 1.3. Perceptions Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=83) (n=42) (n=41) % StdErr % StdErr Sexual assault or sexual misconduct a problem at university Not at all 9.5 4.8 12.1 5.4 A little 10.1 4.4 14.5 5.3 Somewhat 34.9 6.2 28.4 7.0 Very 21.8 6.5 21.7 5.7 Extremely 23.7 5.1 23.2 7.0 Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct on campus Not at all 19.3 5.4 34.9 6.8 A little 29.3 6.8 35.5 6.4 Somewhat 28.6 5.9 19.1 6.3 Very 11.5 4.6 s s Extremely 11.3 4.0 8.5 3.7 Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct off campus at university-sponsored events Not at all 9.3 3.6 31.3 6.6 A little 34.2 6.6 35.1 6.8 Somewhat 33.9 7.0 20.0 6.5 Very 15.8 4.8 s s Extremely s s 9.0 3.9 1 Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non-conforming, questioning, not listed.

Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Awareness of services Aware of services provided by Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) 65.8 0.6 86.0 1.0 58.4 0.9 83.5 1.3 55.7 1.0 Aware of services provided by Gender-Based Misconduct Office 43.8 0.5 61.8 1.2 33.3 0.8 64.6 1.3 36.4 1.1 Aware of services provided by Columbia Health/Student Health Services Aware of services provided by Counseling and Psychological Services/Mental Health Services Aware of services provided by Office of Equal Opportunity & Affirmative Action 84.3 0.5 90.7 0.8 85.2 0.6 86.8 1.1 79.1 0.8 75.3 0.5 90.1 0.8 75.5 0.8 84.3 1.0 63.8 1.0 21.0 0.4 22.0 1.0 16.7 0.6 29.9 1.4 20.8 0.9 Aware of services provided by University Public Safety 68.7 0.5 79.9 1.1 63.6 0.8 79.4 1.0 64.1 0.9 Aware of services provided by Residential Programs 27.3 0.5 56.0 1.1 12.7 0.5 54.4 1.4 16.4 0.8 Aware of services provided by Office of the University Chaplain 22.0 0.5 30.2 1.3 13.2 0.6 42.6 1.6 17.9 0.7 Aware of services provided by Human Resources 26.4 0.5 22.5 1.1 23.6 0.6 33.6 1.5 27.8 0.9 Aware of services provided by Disability Services 38.7 0.6 52.4 1.4 33.0 0.8 56.6 1.2 29.6 1.0 Aware of services provided by Alice! Health Promotion 47.1 0.5 76.3 1.1 38.3 0.9 70.7 1.4 31.3 0.8 Aware of services provided by Ombuds Office 26.0 0.5 19.8 1.0 30.9 0.8 21.6 1.3 25.7 1.0

Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Knowledgeable about how sexual assault and sexual misconduct defined at university Not at all 12.6 0.4 9.5 0.7 16.0 0.6 6.8 0.8 13.3 0.8 A little bit 26.2 0.5 22.0 1.1 30.5 0.7 20.9 1.3 26.2 0.9 Somewhat 35.7 0.5 36.2 1.4 35.5 0.7 35.3 1.5 36.1 1.1 Very 19.8 0.4 24.0 1.1 14.8 0.6 25.6 1.4 19.9 0.8 Extremely 5.8 0.2 8.2 0.8 3.1 0.3 11.4 0.9 4.6 0.4 Knowledgeable about where to get help at university if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct Not at all 8.5 0.3 4.6 0.6 10.6 0.5 3.2 0.5 10.6 0.7 A little bit 23.1 0.5 15.2 1.0 27.9 0.6 13.2 0.9 26.5 0.9 Somewhat 38.7 0.6 37.6 1.4 39.3 0.8 37.2 1.4 39.4 1.0 Very 22.4 0.4 31.0 1.3 18.2 0.6 31.0 1.5 18.6 0.9 Extremely 7.3 0.3 11.7 0.9 4.0 0.4 15.4 1.0 4.9 0.4 Knowledgeable about where to make a report if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all 17.3 0.4 13.9 1.0 22.6 0.8 8.8 0.9 17.1 0.8 A little bit 26.0 0.5 22.1 1.2 28.8 0.7 18.7 1.3 28.7 0.9 Somewhat 33.1 0.5 34.2 1.3 32.6 0.8 34.2 1.3 32.7 0.9 Very 17.7 0.4 21.4 1.1 13.3 0.7 25.3 1.3 16.5 0.7 Extremely 6.0 0.3 8.5 0.7 2.6 0.3 13.0 1.1 5.0 0.4

Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Knowledgeable about what happens when a student reports sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all 30.5 0.5 25.9 1.2 37.0 0.8 20.0 1.2 31.0 1.0 A little bit 29.3 0.5 27.2 1.2 30.3 0.7 25.9 1.3 30.9 1.0 Somewhat 27.9 0.5 32.7 1.2 24.3 0.7 30.8 1.4 28.0 1.1 Very 8.9 0.4 9.5 0.8 6.5 0.5 15.8 1.3 7.8 0.7 Extremely 3.4 0.2 4.8 0.7 1.8 0.2 7.6 0.8 2.3 0.3 Initial university orientation included information about sexual assault or sexual misconduct Yes 75.8 0.7 88.4 1.5 70.6 1.1 90.1 1.9 73.6 1.3 Not at all 15.0 0.7 10.2 1.3 13.8 1.0 15.7 2.2 17.4 1.4 A little 25.8 0.9 26.9 2.0 29.1 1.3 20.9 2.3 23.3 1.5 Somewhat 39.7 1.1 44.4 2.1 39.7 1.5 42.7 3.0 37.7 1.9 Very 16.3 0.7 15.0 1.5 15.4 1.1 17.0 2.2 17.6 1.4 Extremely 3.1 0.4 3.5 0.9 2.1 0.4 3.6 1.0 4.0 0.6 No 7.5 0.4 3.4 0.9 10.6 0.8 3.5 1.0 6.9 0.8 I didn't attend orientation 3.5 0.3 2.5 0.8 3.7 0.5 s s 4.5 0.6 I don't remember 13.2 0.6 5.8 1.2 15.2 0.8 6.0 1.5 15.0 1.0 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1a. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 443 11.3 0.9 894 22.7 1.2 Penetration 152 3.9 0.5 429 10.9 0.7 Physical force only 77 2.0 0.4 249 6.3 0.7 Completed 59 1.5 0.3 164 4.2 0.5 Attempted 28 0.7 0.2 148 3.8 0.5 Incapacitation only 68 1.7 0.3 209 5.3 0.5 Both physical force and incapacitation 22 0.5 0.2 67 1.7 0.4 Sexual Touching 359 9.1 0.7 679 17.3 1.1 Physical force only 220 5.6 0.5 436 11.1 0.9 Incapacitation only 161 4.1 0.5 280 7.1 0.6 Both physical force and incapacitation 27 0.7 0.2 61 1.5 0.3 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1b. Percent of Graduate Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr involving physical force or incapacitation 389 4.3 0.4 714 8.0 0.5 Penetration 165 1.8 0.2 332 3.7 0.3 Physical force only 81 0.9 0.2 166 1.9 0.2 Completed 46 0.5 0.1 110 1.2 0.2 Attempted 45 0.5 0.1 105 1.2 0.2 Incapacitation only 77 0.9 0.2 178 2.0 0.3 Both physical force and incapacitation 15 0.2 0.1 39 0.4 0.1 Sexual Touching 271 3.0 0.3 492 5.5 0.4 Physical force only 171 1.9 0.2 335 3.7 0.4 Incapacitation only 92 1.0 0.2 163 1.8 0.2 Both physical force and incapacitation 23 0.3 0.1 36 0.4 0.1 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1c. Percent of Male Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 98 2.5 0.4 205 5.2 0.7 Penetration 26 0.7 0.2 73 1.8 0.4 Physical force only 18 0.5 0.2 28 0.7 0.2 Completed s s s 21 0.5 0.2 Attempted s s s 13 0.3 0.2 Incapacitation only s s s 45 1.1 0.3 Both physical force and incapacitation - - - - - - Sexual Touching 72 1.8 0.4 152 3.8 0.6 Physical force only 55 1.4 0.3 106 2.7 0.5 Incapacitation only 31 0.8 0.3 61 1.5 0.4 Both physical force and incapacitation - - - s s s 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1d. Percent of Graduate Male Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 108 1.3 0.2 192 2.3 0.3 Penetration 55 0.6 0.2 100 1.2 0.3 Physical force only 30 0.4 0.1 58 0.7 0.2 Completed s s s 33 0.4 0.2 Attempted 30 0.4 0.1 43 0.5 0.2 Incapacitation only 29 0.3 0.1 47 0.6 0.2 Both physical force and incapacitation 18 0.2 0.1 18 0.2 0.1 Sexual Touching 73 0.9 0.1 134 1.6 0.2 Physical force only 46 0.5 0.1 81 1.0 0.2 Incapacitation only 25 0.3 0.1 58 0.7 0.2 Both physical force and incapacitation s s s 16 0.2 0.1 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1e. Percent of Students of Other Gender Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 32 20.3 4.5 36 22.9 4.6 Penetration 14 8.9 3.7 21 13.3 4.4 Physical force only 14 8.9 3.7 21 13.3 4.4 Completed 14 8.9 3.7 21 13.3 4.4 Attempted s s s 14 8.9 3.7 Incapacitation only s s s 11 7.3 3.5 Both physical force and incapacitation - - - - - - Sexual Touching 21 13.4 3.6 25 16.1 4.1 Physical force only 21 13.4 3.6 25 16.1 4.1 Incapacitation only s s s 9 5.6 2.8 Both physical force and incapacitation - - - - - - 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.1f. Percent of Graduate Students of Other Gender Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 18 11.3 4.4 18 11.3 4.4 Penetration s s s s s s Physical force only s s s s s s Completed s s s s s s Attempted - - - - - - Incapacitation only - - - - - - Both physical force and incapacitation - - - - - - Sexual Touching 15 9.3 4.2 15 9.3 4.2 Physical force only 9 5.5 2.8 9 5.5 2.8 Incapacitation only s s s s s s Both physical force and incapacitation - - - - - - 1 Per 100 students.

Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment 1, 2, 3 Status Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Sexual orientation Heterosexual 6.8 0.3 19.8 1.3 7.4 0.5 4.1 0.7 1.4 0.2 Non-Heterosexual 16.2 1.1 39.1 2.6 13.4 2.0 11.9 2.3 8.3 1.8 Ethnicity Hispanic 11.5 1.0 25.4 3.5 9.1 1.6 7.8 2.3 7.0 1.8 Not Hispanic 7.6 0.3 22.3 1.2 7.8 0.6 4.7 0.7 1.7 0.2 Race American Indian or Alaska Native 15.7 2.9 33.8 6.8 11.1 4.1 s s s s Asian 6.0 0.5 16.8 1.9 7.2 0.8 3.0 0.9 1.2 0.5 Black or African American 10.8 1.2 23.2 2.9 5.8 1.7 4.7 2.1 4.3 2.2 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 13.3 4.2 s s 17.0 8.4 - - s s White 9.5 0.4 26.6 1.7 9.4 0.7 7.2 1.0 3.2 0.5 Disability Yes 18.9 2.2 30.2 4.1 17.8 5.1 9.5 3.6 s s No 7.7 0.3 22.2 1.3 7.7 0.5 4.9 0.7 2.3 0.3 Marital status Never married 6.1 0.4 - - 9.3 0.7 - - 2.6 0.4 Not married but living with a partner 5.7 0.9 - - 7.0 1.1 - - 4.2 1.4 Married 1.2 0.5 - - 2.7 1.1 - - - - Divorced or separated 9.5 3.8 - - 8.0 3.9 - - s s Other 4.5 1.5 - - 7.3 3.1 - - - -

Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman 11.8 1.4 16.4 2.0 - - 5.6 1.7 - - Sophomore 7.5 1.2 11.5 2.0 - - 2.9 1.1 - - Junior 6.2 0.9 10.9 1.7 - - 1.3 0.6 - - Senior 4.9 0.8 8.3 1.3 - - 1.5 0.7 - - Since entering college Freshman 11.8 1.4 16.4 2.0 - - 5.6 1.7 - - Sophomore 14.5 1.5 22.4 2.5 - - 6.0 1.5 - - Junior 14.5 1.3 24.4 2.3 - - 5.0 1.3 - - Senior 14.9 1.2 25.5 2.4 - - 4.5 1.1 - -

Table 3.2. Percent of Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Victim Characteristics, Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Graduate/ Current year 1st year 3.7 0.4 - - 5.2 0.6 - - 1.7 0.4 2nd year 3.4 0.4 - - 4.8 0.7 - - 1.6 0.5 3rd year 2.2 0.6 - - 3.4 1.1 - - s s 4th year 1.7 0.6 - - 3.0 1.2 - - - - 5th year - - - - - - - - - - 6th year or higher - - - - - - - - - - Since entering college 1st year 4.0 0.4 - - 5.7 0.6 - - 1.7 0.4 2nd year 6.2 0.5 - - 8.9 0.9 - - 2.8 0.6 3rd year 5.9 1.0 - - 9.9 1.8 - - 2.5 1.1 4th year 8.9 1.7 - - 14.5 3.4 - - 4.1 1.5 5th year 2.2 0.8 - - 4.8 1.8 - - - - 6th year or higher 4.4 1.3 - - 8.2 2.6 - - s s 1 Since enrolled in the college. Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment 1, 2, 3 Status Penetration Sexual Touching Sexual orientation Heterosexual 11.0 0.6 9.4 0.7 3.5 0.4 14.8 1.1 4.9 0.4 Non-Heterosexual 23.8 1.7 18.9 2.2 5.1 1.4 30.1 2.5 10.7 1.8 Ethnicity Hispanic 15.6 1.7 13.3 2.6 2.7 1.0 21.3 3.5 7.4 1.4 Not Hispanic 12.1 0.6 10.5 0.8 3.7 0.4 16.6 1.1 5.3 0.5 Race American Indian or Alaska Native 22.1 4.1 13.0 5.3 s s 27.3 6.6 6.7 3.2 Asian 9.9 0.8 7.1 1.1 3.0 0.5 14.0 1.7 5.2 0.6 Black or African American 13.8 1.6 11.0 2.0 3.0 1.2 15.8 2.4 2.8 1.1 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 12.4 5.0 - - - - s s 17.0 8.4 White 14.6 0.8 14.0 1.2 4.6 0.5 19.5 1.5 6.4 0.6 Disability Yes 24.6 3.1 19.3 3.9 13.1 3.3 16.1 3.2 11.1 3.9 No 12.0 0.6 10.3 0.8 3.4 0.3 17.3 1.1 5.4 0.4 Marital status Never married 9.3 0.7 - - 4.7 0.4 - - 6.2 0.6 Not married but living with a partner 7.0 1.1 - - 3.0 0.8 - - 4.5 0.9 Married 2.7 1.1 - - s s - - 2.7 1.1 Divorced or separated 8.0 3.9 - - - - - - 8.0 3.9 Other 7.3 3.1 - - - - - - 7.3 3.1

Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Year in School and Timing of Incidents Current year Freshman 16.4 2.0 5.1 1.2 - - 14.4 1.9 - - Sophomore 11.5 2.0 4.4 1.1 - - 8.4 1.8 - - Junior 10.9 1.7 3.2 1.0 - - 9.1 1.5 - - Senior 8.3 1.3 3.3 1.0 - - 6.6 1.2 - - Since entering college Freshman 16.4 2.0 5.1 1.2 - - 14.4 1.9 - - Sophomore 22.4 2.5 11.3 1.9 - - 15.3 2.0 - - Junior 24.4 2.3 13.0 1.6 - - 18.5 2.0 - - Senior 25.5 2.4 12.5 1.6 - - 19.5 2.2 - - Graduate/ Current year 1st year 5.2 0.6 - - 2.2 0.3 - - 3.5 0.5 2nd year 4.8 0.7 - - 1.6 0.4 - - 4.2 0.7 3rd year 3.4 1.1 - - 2.0 0.8 - - 1.7 0.9 4th year 3.0 1.2 - - s s - - s s 5th year - - - - - - - - - - 6th year - - - - - - - - - -

Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Since entering college 1st year 5.7 0.6 - - 2.6 0.4 - - 3.8 0.5 2nd year 8.9 0.9 - - 3.7 0.5 - - 6.9 0.8 3rd year 9.9 1.8 - - 5.9 1.4 - - 5.7 1.4 4th year 14.5 3.4 - - 5.2 2.0 - - 11.9 3.0 5th year 4.8 1.8 - - 3.8 1.7 - - s s 6th year 8.2 2.6 - - 4.5 1.9 - - 4.8 2.1 1 Since enrolled in the college. Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.4a. Number of Times Females Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Enrollment Status for the Current year and Since Entering College 1, 2 (n=1,163) (n=2,817) % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Current school year Number of times 0 times 97.5 0.2 96.1 0.5 98.2 0.2 1 time 1.7 0.2 2.8 0.4 1.3 0.2 2 times 0.5 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.1 3 times 0.1 0.0 s s s s 4 or more times 0.1 0.1 s s 0.1 0.1 Since entering college Number of times 0 times 94.1 0.4 89.1 0.7 96.3 0.3 1 time 3.8 0.3 6.6 0.6 2.5 0.3 2 times 1.2 0.2 2.6 0.4 0.6 0.1 3 times 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 4 or more times 0.6 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 1 Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force or c) by incapacitation.

Table 3.4b. Number of Times Students Reported Nonconsensual Sexual Touching by Physical Force or Incapacitation by Current School Year or Since Entering Current College by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=3,980) Male (n=2,655) (n=1,163) (n=2,817) (n=855) (n=1,800) Current school year Number of times 0 times 96.9 0.2 90.9 0.7 97.0 0.3 98.2 0.4 99.1 0.1 1 time 1.8 0.1 4.8 0.6 1.9 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.6 0.1 2 times 0.8 0.1 2.7 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 3 times 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.1 s s s s 4 or more times 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 s s Since entering college Number of times 0 times 94.2 0.3 82.8 1.1 94.5 0.4 96.3 0.6 98.4 0.2 1 time 3.0 0.2 7.8 0.7 3.2 0.3 2.3 0.5 1.0 0.2 2 times 1.2 0.1 4.7 0.6 1.0 0.2 s s 0.3 0.1 3 times 0.7 0.1 2.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.2 s s 4 or more times 0.9 0.1 2.4 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 1 Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force or b) by incapacitation.

Table 3.5a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break 70.7 3.8 76.8 4.0 Some incidents occurred during academic break 13.3 3.0 6.9 2.4 All incidents occurred during academic break 16.0 2.8 16.3 3.6 Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes 64.2 3.4 51.6 4.8 No 35.8 3.4 48.4 4.8 On university property University residence hall/dorm 73.6 4.1 81.1 4.9 Fraternity or Sorority house 20.9 3.2 15.2 4.6 Other space used by single-sex org - - - - Other residential housing 20.7 3.8 17.2 5.8 Non-residential building 4.1 2.0 s s Other property (e.g., outdoors) 12.4 3.2 9.3 3.3 Not on university property Private residence 60.0 6.3 67.2 6.4 Fraternity or Sorority house s s - - Other space used by single-sex org - - - - Restaurant, bar, or club 18.5 5.1 29.0 7.1 Other social venue - - 5.7 2.9 Outdoor or recreational space 6.4 3.1 s s Some other place 18.7 5.5 18.1 5.3 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.5b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break 86.8 2.0 80.4 3.2 Some incidents occurred during academic break 5.9 1.3 7.5 2.4 All incidents occurred during academic break 7.3 1.6 12.1 3.0 Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes 59.3 2.7 62.3 3.7 No 40.7 2.7 37.7 3.7 On university property University residence hall/dorm 52.5 4.7 71.8 5.2 Fraternity or Sorority house 20.9 3.2 19.2 4.1 Other space used by single-sex org - - s s Other residential housing 12.1 2.6 17.7 4.9 Non-residential building 16.5 2.9 7.2 3.0 Other property (e.g., outdoors) 25.0 3.4 9.6 3.4 Not on university property Private residence 24.4 4.0 46.1 7.8 Fraternity or Sorority house 2.9 1.4 - - Other space used by single-sex org - - s s Restaurant, bar, or club 47.4 5.2 46.4 7.8 Other social venue 7.0 2.1 10.8 4.6 Outdoor or recreational space 12.0 2.9 - - Some other place 19.0 3.1 13.5 5.1 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.5c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break 82.2 6.3 92.8 4.7 Some incidents occurred during academic break 10.8 5.4 s s All incidents occurred during academic break 7.1 3.6 s s Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes 51.7 6.2 53.3 8.7 No 48.3 6.2 46.7 8.7 On university property University residence hall/dorm 58.8 10.3 50.6 14.1 Fraternity or Sorority house 17.5 7.3 s s Other space used by single-sex org - - - - Other residential housing s s 19.9 10.0 Non-residential building s s s s Other property (e.g., outdoors) 27.9 9.5 s s Not on university property Private residence s s 37.5 14.1 Fraternity or Sorority house - - s s Other space used by single-sex org - - - - Restaurant, bar, or club 70.1 8.8 s s Other social venue 23.1 8.7 s s Outdoor or recreational space s s s s Some other place 17.4 6.9 s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.6a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female 3.0 1.5 3.7 1.9 Male 98.2 1.1 95.7 1.9 Other gender identity - - s s Number of offenders 1 offender 78.6 3.8 82.5 3.2 2 offenders 17.7 3.4 15.1 3.0 3 or more offenders 3.7 1.4 2.4 1.2 University affiliation Student 60.6 3.5 64.0 4.0 Faculty or instructor 2.6 1.3 s s Coach or trainer - - - - Other staff or administrator - - - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) s s s s The person was not affiliated with university 4.3 1.6 s s Don t know association with university 40.5 4.0 36.1 4.0 Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with 21.8 3.4 17.1 3.8 Someone I had dated or was intimate with 19.6 3.0 15.3 2.9 Teacher or advisor - - - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor 2.4 1.2 s s Friend or acquaintance 55.8 3.6 57.8 4.8 Stranger 27.2 3.6 21.1 3.8 Other s s s s Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.6b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female 5.2 1.2 5.0 2.0 Male 98.0 0.8 97.8 1.3 Other gender identity - - - - Number of offenders 1 offender 77.4 2.3 65.3 4.3 2 offenders 13.1 2.0 23.9 3.2 3 or more offenders 9.6 1.6 10.9 2.7 University affiliation Student 74.9 2.6 79.4 3.4 Faculty or instructor s s s s Coach or trainer - - - - Other staff or administrator s s - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) s s - - The person was not affiliated with university 7.4 1.6 8.7 2.6 Don t know association with university 22.1 2.2 25.6 4.5 Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with 10.6 1.7 13.4 3.0 Someone I had dated or was intimate with 2.9 0.8 5.9 2.0 Teacher or advisor s s - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor 2.3 0.9 s s Friend or acquaintance 53.8 3.1 61.3 4.0 Stranger 40.6 2.9 34.9 3.6 Other 1.9 0.7 s s Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.6c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female 56.0 7.9 70.8 8.2 Male 56.2 7.9 34.6 11.2 Other gender identity s s - - Number of offenders 1 offender 78.5 6.3 77.1 7.8 2 offenders 11.6 4.5 s s 3 or more offenders 9.9 4.9 19.8 6.9 University affiliation Student 78.4 5.6 84.1 6.5 Faculty or instructor s s - - Coach or trainer - - - - Other staff or administrator s s s s Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) - - - - The person was not affiliated with university 16.8 5.4 s s Don t know association with university 19.2 6.1 s s Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with 8.7 3.8 12.9 6.8 Someone I had dated or was intimate with 6.9 3.5 - - Teacher or advisor s s - - Co-worker, boss or supervisor - - - - Friend or acquaintance 54.5 7.2 65.0 9.4 Stranger 35.1 6.4 41.3 14.8 Other s s - - Don t Know s s s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.7a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes 63.1 3.5 80.1 3.9 No 16.7 3.1 11.6 3.3 Don't know 20.2 3.2 8.4 2.4 Offender using drugs Yes 13.2 2.6 9.9 2.2 No 38.8 4.4 47.7 4.5 Don't know 48.0 4.3 42.4 4.4 Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes 63.5 3.7 88.4 3.2 No 36.5 3.7 11.6 3.2 Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes 8.3 2.2 11.8 3.1 No 91.7 2.2 88.2 3.1 Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain 2.5 1.1 3.0 1.5 I suspect, but I am not certain 11.0 2.4 13.4 3.1 No 82.9 2.9 66.7 4.3 Don't know 3.6 1.3 16.9 3.8 Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes 23.8 5.0 24.9 4.2 No 62.8 5.0 41.9 5.1 Not sure 13.4 2.9 33.3 5.3 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.7b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes 64.3 2.8 80.4 3.7 No 12.6 2.0 7.8 2.4 Don't know 23.1 2.4 11.8 3.0 Offender using drugs Yes 4.1 1.4 9.6 2.6 No 36.2 2.9 44.6 3.2 Don't know 59.6 3.2 45.8 3.7 Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes 57.1 3.0 82.6 3.6 No 42.9 3.0 17.4 3.6 Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes 4.9 1.6 7.3 2.1 No 95.1 1.6 92.7 2.1 Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain s s 3.1 1.5 I suspect, but I am not certain - - s s No 96.9 1.2 90.8 2.8 Don't know 2.4 1.1 4.3 1.7 Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes 4.0 1.3 20.3 4.9 No 93.7 1.9 66.6 6.7 Not sure 2.3 1.1 13.1 3.8 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.7c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes 71.4 6.7 64.0 9.5 No 8.4 4.0 s s Don't know 20.2 5.6 32.1 9.7 Offender using drugs Yes 6.7 3.2 - - No 34.9 7.0 59.6 12.3 Don't know 58.4 6.8 40.4 12.3 Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes 58.7 6.9 85.0 7.6 No 41.3 6.9 15.0 7.6 Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes s s - - No 94.8 3.2 100.0 0.0 Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain - - - - I suspect, but I am not certain - - - - No 91.7 3.9 86.8 7.3 Don't know 8.3 3.9 13.2 7.3 Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes s s 23.5 8.2 No 92.5 4.5 65.3 9.3 Not sure s s 11.1 6.2 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.8a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries 23.0 3.9 s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling 68.4 7.5 - - Chipped or knocked out teeth - - - - Broken bones s s - - Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) 49.6 8.4 s s Other injuries 29.7 7.2 - - Contract a sexually transmitted disease 3.0 1.3 s s Become pregnant from the experience 2.1 1.1 s s None of the above 74.2 3.7 95.3 2.0 Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams 63.3 4.6 43.8 5.4 Fearfulness or being concerned about safety 50.6 4.4 23.8 4.7 Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness 47.5 4.4 25.5 3.4 Nightmares or trouble sleeping 45.1 4.1 19.6 3.9 Feeling numb or detached 56.6 4.3 42.2 4.8 Headaches or stomach aches 23.4 4.0 9.2 2.8 Eating problems or disorders 21.2 3.7 10.3 2.4 Increased drug or alcohol use 28.7 4.6 12.6 2.8 None of the above 17.8 3.4 30.9 4.8 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.8b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries 2.1 0.9 s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling s s - - Chipped or knocked out teeth - - - - Broken bones - - - - Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) - - s s Other injuries s s s s Contract a sexually transmitted disease - - s s Become pregnant from the experience - - s s None of the above 96.2 1.1 95.1 2.2 Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams 24.0 2.6 22.9 4.3 Fearfulness or being concerned about safety 26.4 2.5 9.6 3.2 Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness 11.6 2.3 22.8 4.1 Nightmares or trouble sleeping 10.7 1.6 11.7 3.6 Feeling numb or detached 17.6 2.5 20.1 4.8 Headaches or stomach aches 5.4 1.2 7.4 3.2 Eating problems or disorders 5.4 1.3 4.9 2.1 Increased drug or alcohol use 6.4 1.6 8.9 3.3 None of the above 55.6 3.3 63.3 4.6 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.8c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries - - s s Bruises, black-eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling - - s s Chipped or knocked out teeth - - - - Broken bones - - - - Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) - - - - Other injuries - - - - Contract a sexually transmitted disease - - - - Become pregnant from the experience - - - - None of the above 98.4 1.4 94.8 4.6 Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams 25.4 6.1 35.4 8.5 Fearfulness or being concerned about safety s s s s Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness 12.2 5.2 21.6 8.0 Nightmares or trouble sleeping 11.4 4.3 26.2 7.5 Feeling numb or detached 15.5 5.2 23.4 7.8 Headaches or stomach aches s s s s Eating problems or disorders s s s s Increased drug or alcohol use 12.9 5.8 16.0 6.8 None of the above 54.2 6.5 58.2 9.7 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.9a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and 1, 2, 3 Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Behavior and Tactic Penetration Sexual Touching By Force By Incapacitation By Force By Incapacitation Report of incident to a Program % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Reported to a Program Yes 45.6 4.9 16.8 4.1 14.7 2.2 11.7 3.6 No 54.4 4.9 83.2 4.1 85.3 2.2 88.3 3.6 Did not contact a Program Did not know where to go or who to tell 7.4 2.7 8.2 3.2 6.9 1.7 4.5 1.9 Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult 14.8 2.8 37.5 5.1 12.8 2.2 10.9 2.6 I did not think anyone would believe me 23.1 4.7 4.9 2.0 5.1 1.4 4.1 1.9 I did not think it was serious enough to report 58.1 5.3 52.7 5.8 69.2 3.0 74.8 4.2 I did not want the person to get into trouble 18.8 4.2 32.1 3.9 12.8 2.3 13.5 3.1 I feared negative social consequences 16.9 3.8 21.8 3.5 12.5 2.2 16.3 3.7 I did not think anything would be done 34.6 5.1 25.7 4.9 29.9 2.7 24.1 4.5 I feared it would not be kept confidential 16.9 4.0 12.0 3.6 9.2 2.0 7.6 2.3 Incident was not on campus or associated with the school 5.9 2.2 s s 2.5 1.1 s s Incident did not occur while attending school 27.3 4.8 26.2 4.6 16.4 2.4 10.3 2.9 Other Reason 12.0 3.7 25.5 4.0 12.6 2.3 12.1 3.4

Table 3.9a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Behavior and Tactic 1, 2, 3 (continued) Penetration Sexual Touching Report to others By Force By Incapacitation By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Friend 91.4 2.3 77.2 4.3 77.4 2.9 70.6 4.7 Family member 33.9 4.2 11.1 2.9 14.9 2.2 11.9 2.6 Faculty 13.6 3.2 s s 3.5 1.2 - - Someone else 17.6 3.0 6.7 2.0 6.7 1.4 4.7 1.9 I didn t tell anyone else 6.8 2.1 22.0 4.0 20.5 2.8 30.0 5.1 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.9b. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation Reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did 1, 2, 3 Not Report to a Program by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Reported to a program Inapplicable - - - - No 100 0.0 100 0.0 Yes - - - - Did not contact a program Did not know where to go or who to tell s s - - Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult 25.1 6.0 26.1 9.7 I did not think anyone would believe me s s s s I did not think anything would be done 20.3 5.4 s s I did not think it was serious enough to report 71.9 7.2 65.9 12.1 I did not want the person to get into trouble 15.7 5.1 21.9 7.2 I feared it would not be kept confidential 9.1 3.8 18.1 6.2 I feared negative social consequences 14.2 5.3 21.3 7.4 Incident did not occur while attending school 9.0 3.8 s s Incident was not on campus or associated with the school s s - - Other Reason 16.8 5.8 21.5 8.3 Report to others Friend 58.8 7.7 65.4 7.6 Family member s s s s Faculty - - - - Someone else 9.2 4.0 17.0 6.8 I didn t tell anyone else 37.2 7.8 34.6 7.6 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Gender-Based Misconduct Office Columbia Health/Student Health Services % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program 25.0 3.8 19.1 3.2 26.7 4.1 When contacted Fall of 2014 - present 53.9 9.7 39.6 9.3 54.5 8.6 Fall of 2013 - Summer of 2014 18.3 6.8 29.6 9.1 20.7 5.7 Fall of 2012 - Summer of 2013 15.7 5.4 30.8 9.3 6.7 4.1 Prior to Fall 2012 s s - - 18.0 8.6 How useful Not at all s s 56.4 16.4 s s A little 32.7 10.9 s s 16.2 8.2 Somewhat s s s s 40.8 12.2 Very s s s s 19.8 11.8 Extremely 43.7 11.8 - - s s Evaluation of Contact made since fall of 2014 Pressure from university on whether to proceed Yes 22.6 9.2 56.4 16.4 s s To proceed 100.0 0.0 62.0 23.5 s s Not to proceed - - s s - - No 84.8 7.4 43.6 16.4 88.2 7.3

Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 (continued) Sexual Violence & Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center (SVR) Gender-Based Misconduct Office Columbia Health/Student Health Services % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program 25.0 3.8 19.1 3.2 26.7 4.1 Program showed respect towards victim Excellent 44.2 11.6 - - s s Very good 33.2 12.3 s s 49.9 11.4 Good 19.7 9.6 s s 23.2 10.2 Fair s s s s s s Poor s s 35.5 15.9 s s Helped to understand options Excellent 35.6 10.9 - - s s Very good s s s s 29.4 10.8 Good s s s s 30.2 11.0 Fair 18.9 9.1 s s s s Poor s s 47.5 16.4 22.8 11.0