Combined Assessment Program Summary Report. Evaluation of Selected Requirements in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers



Similar documents
Combined Assessment Program Summary Report. Construction Safety at Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Combined Assessment Program Summary Report. Evaluation of Quality Management in Veterans Health Administration Facilities Fiscal Year 2012

Combined Assessment Program Summary Report. Evaluation of Quality Management in Veterans Health Administration Facilities Fiscal Year 2013

Combined Assessment Program Summary Report. Evaluation of Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management at Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Healthcare Inspection. Oversight of the Community Nursing Home Program Oklahoma City VA Medical Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Atlanta VA Medical Center Atlanta, Georgia

VA Office of Inspector General

Healthcare Inspection. Reporting of Suspected Patient Neglect Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System Tuskegee, Alabama

Healthcare Inspection. Surgical Quality of Care Review Southern Arizona VA Health Care System Tucson, Arizona

Healthcare Inspection. Credentialing and Privileging Concerns Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center Columbia, South Carolina

Healthcare Inspection. Patient Telemetry Monitoring Concerns Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center Houston, Texas

Healthcare Inspection

Healthcare Inspection. Follow-Up Review of the Pause in Providing Inpatient Care VA Northern Indiana Healthcare System Fort Wayne, Indiana

Healthcare Inspection Emergency Department Length of Stay and Call Center Wait Times VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado

Healthcare Inspection. Supervision of Nurse Anesthetists in the Anesthesia Section Dayton VA Medical Center Dayton, Ohio

Healthcare Inspection. Evaluation of Management of Moderate Sedation in Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Healthcare Inspection Review of a Surgical Technician s Duties John D. Dingell VA Medical Center Detroit, Michigan

Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Southern Oregon Rehabilitation Center and Clinics White City, Oregon

OIG Determination of Veterans Health Administration s Occupational Staffing Shortages

Healthcare Inspection

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Orlando VA Medical Center Orlando, Florida

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of St. Cloud VA Health Care System St. Cloud, Minnesota

Healthcare Inspection. Access and Oversight Concerns for Home Health Services Washington DC VA Medical Center Washington, District of Columbia

VA Office of Inspector General

Healthcare Inspection. Eye Care Concerns Eastern Kansas Health Care System Topeka and Leavenworth, Kansas

Review of Alleged Manipulation of Waiting Times, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

Healthcare Inspection. Review of Allegations of Coding and Billing Irregularities, VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri

VA Office of Inspector General

VA Office of Inspector General

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Southern Arizona VA Health Care System Tucson, Arizona

Combined Assessment Program Review of the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Orlando VA Medical Center Orlando, Florida

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Cincinnati VA Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio

Healthcare Inspection. Follow-Up Assessment of Radiation Therapy VA Long Beach Healthcare System Long Beach, California

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Phoenix VA Health Care System Phoenix, Arizona

VA Office of Inspector General

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of Northport VA Medical Center, Northport, New York

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Kansas City VA Medical Center Kansas City, Missouri

Healthcare Inspection. Alleged Staffing and Quality of Care Issues VA Black Hills Health Care System Hot Springs, South Dakota

Combined Assessment Program Review of VA Butler Healthcare Butler, Pennsylvania

VA Office of Inspector General

Healthcare Inspection. Alleged Quality of Care Issues Amarillo VA Health Care System Amarillo, Texas

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

Healthcare Inspection. Alleged Substandard Prostate Cancer Screening VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System Denver, Colorado

Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Central Iowa Health Care System Des Moines, Iowa

Community Based Outpatient Clinic and Primary Care Clinic Reviews at Bath VA Medical Center Bath, New York

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of Durham VA Medical Center Durham, North Carolina

Healthcare Inspection. Quality of Care Concerns Hospice/Palliative Care Program VA Western New York Healthcare System Buffalo, New York

Community Based Outpatient Clinic Reviews at Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center Richmond, VA

Healthcare Inspection. Patient Care Issues and Contract Mental Health Program Mismanagement Atlanta VA Medical Center Decatur, Georgia

Community Based Outpatient Clinic and Primary Care Clinic Reviews at James E. Van Zandt VA Medical Center Altoona, Pennsylvania

Healthcare Inspection Management of Government Resources and Personnel Practices VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas, Texas

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC February 9, 2009

Healthcare Inspection

VA Office of Inspector General

Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Northern California Health Care System Sacramento, California

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Washington, DC, VA Medical Center Washington, DC

Combined Assessment Program Review of the El Paso VA Health Care System El Paso, Texas

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK Washington, DC August 16, 2004 HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE CARE REIMBURSEMENT HANDBOOK

VA Office of Inspector General

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center Chicago, Illinois

Healthcare Inspection. Alleged Nursing Care Deficiencies Led to a Patient s Death Hampton VA Medical Center Hampton, Virginia

Health Care - A Review of the Combined Assessment Program

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System North Las Vegas, Nevada

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Coatesville VA Medical Center Coatesville, Pennsylvania

VA Office of Inspector General

Objectives. Objectives 4/5/2014

Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Medical Center Asheville, North Carolina

VA Office of Inspector General

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Louis A. Johnson VA Medical Center Clarksburg, West Virginia

Healthcare Inspection. Quality of Care Issues Involving Manchester VA Medical Center and VA Boston Healthcare System

Healthcare Inspection. Staffing and Patient Care Issues West Palm Beach VA Medical Center, West Palm Beach, Florida

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of John J. Pershing VA Medical Center Poplar Bluff, Missouri

Restorative Care. Policy, Procedures and Training Package

VA NURSING HOMES. Reporting More Complete Data on Workload and Expenditures Could Enhance Oversight

Combined Assessment Program Review of the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System Denver, Colorado

Combined Assessment Program Review of the St. Cloud VA Health Care System St. Cloud, Minnesota

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Cincinnati VA Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio

VA Office of Inspector General

VA Office of Inspector General

Healthcare Inspection. Radiology Scheduling and Other Administrative Issues Phoenix VA Health Care System Phoenix, Arizona

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Manchester VA Medical Center Manchester, New Hampshire

VA Office of Inspector General

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Royal C. Johnson Veterans Memorial Medical Center Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Restorative Nursing Teleconference Script

Healthcare Inspection. Medical Device Recall Process in Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers

Career Options for Direct Service Workers in Maine

Office of Inspector General

VA Office of Inspector General

Audit of the Medical Care Collection Fund Program

VA Office of Inspector General

Review of Community Based Outpatient Clinics and Other Outpatient Clinics of Louis A. Johnson VA Medical Center Clarksburg, West Virginia

Audit of Veterans Health Administration Vehicle Fleet Management

VA Office of Inspector General

EVALUATION OF EFFORTS TO INTEGRATE COMMERCIALLY-DEVELOPED SOFTWARE TO HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Healthcare Inspection

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK Washington, DC July 31, 2006 COMPLIANCE AND BUSINESS INTEGRITY (CBI) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER 4: CARE AREA ASSESSMENT (CAA) PROCESS AND CARE PLANNING

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK Washington, DC January 31, 2007 HOME-BASED PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Philadelphia VA Medical Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Transcription:

Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Report No. 15-01721-382 Office of Healthcare Inspections Combined Assessment Program Summary Report Evaluation of Selected Requirements in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers June 24, 2015 Washington, DC 20420

To Report Suspected Wrongdoing in VA Programs and Operations: Telephone: 1-800-488-8244 E-Mail: vaoighotline@va.gov Web site: www.va.gov/oig

Executive Summary The VA Office of Inspector General Office of Healthcare Inspections completed an evaluation of selected requirements in Veterans Health Administration community living centers. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine whether facilities complied with selected restorative nursing and dining requirements to assist community living center residents in maintaining their optimal level of functioning, independence, and dignity. We performed this evaluation in conjunction with 47 Combined Assessment Program reviews conducted from October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. We noted high compliance in many areas, including provision of assistive eating devices to residents during meals, dining atmosphere, and honoring residents preferences. To improve operations, we recommended that the Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that: For residents who may be candidates for restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents the reason the resident is not receiving the services or other activities to promote functional status. For residents receiving or supposed to receive restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents goals in their care plans. Nursing employees provide and document restorative nursing services in accordance with the care plan, and if they do not provide the services, they document the reason. Employees complete required restorative summary notes and that the Associate Chief Nurse or designee monitors compliance. For residents not progressing toward restorative goals, the interdisciplinary team reassesses the resident care plan and/or adjusts goals and interventions as necessary. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapists discharging residents from therapy document hand-off communication with nursing employees to ensure interventions continue or are discontinued, as applicable. Facility managers provide and document nursing employee training on range of motion and transfers. VA Office of Inspector General i

Comments The Interim Under Secretary for Health concurred with the findings and recommendations. (See Appendix A, pages 8 15, for the full text of the comments.) The implementation plans are acceptable, and we will follow up until all actions are completed. JOHN D. DAIGH, JR., M.D. Assistant Inspector General for Healthcare Inspections VA Office of Inspector General ii

Purpose The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) Office of Healthcare Inspections completed an evaluation of selected requirements in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) community living centers. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine whether facilities complied with selected restorative nursing and dining requirements to assist community living center residents in maintaining their optimal level of functioning, independence, and dignity. Background Restorative nursing services (RNS) help residents achieve and maintain self-care activities and attain optimal levels of functioning and independence through a program of rehabilitative, restorative, and maintenance interventions. VHA provides RNS for short- and long-term residents, as needed. Resident Assessment Instrument. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) consists of three components: (1) the Minimum Data Set (MDS), (2) the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process, and (3) the RAI Utilization Guidelines. 1 Use of these components yields information about a resident s functional status and preferences and provides guidance on further assessment for any identified problems. MDS. A core set of screening, clinical, and functional status elements, including common definitions and coding categories, which forms the foundation of a comprehensive assessment for all residents. CAA Process. This process assists the assessor to systematically interpret the information recorded on the MDS. Care areas are structured, problem-oriented frameworks for organizing the MDS information and examining additional clinically relevant information about a resident. Each of the 20 problem-oriented care areas includes MDS-based trigger conditions for residents who have or are at risk for developing functional conditions that require further assessment. The CAA Summary contains documentation of the triggered care areas and the decisions made during the CAA process regarding whether to proceed to care planning. Care Plan Development and Implementation. The facility must develop a comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident s identified medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. 2 The care plan includes services that are to be provided to attain or maintain the resident s optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The Associate Chief Nurse provides oversight of the RAI and care plan development processes. An interdisciplinary team of professionals assesses, plans, implements, and 1 The RAI Utilization Guidelines provide instructions for when and how to use the RAI. 2 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. MDS 3.0 RAI Manual. May 2013: Chapter 4: CAA Process and Care Planning. VA Office of Inspector General 1

evaluates a plan of care that is individualized and outcome oriented. At a minimum, for an interdisciplinary team to meet for the purposes of care and treatment planning, a medical provider, nurse, dietitian, social worker, and therapeutic recreation member must attend. Trained nursing employees, such as nursing assistants and licensed nursing staff, implement care plan interventions to achieve resident goals. Dining and Assistive Eating Devices. VHA policy includes specific requirements for dining service in community living centers. 3 The community living center dining environment should encourage socialization and enhance the dining experience for residents. Assistive eating devices support resident independence and allow the resident to dine with dignity. Use of these devices may lead to improved meal intake and nutritional status. The Joint Commission (JC) requires that residents receive restorative services and adaptive self-help devices when needed. Scope and Methodology We performed this evaluation in conjunction with 47 Combined Assessment Program reviews conducted from October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. The facilities we visited were a stratified random sample of all VHA facilities and represented a mix of facility size, affiliation, geographic location, and Veterans Integrated Service Networks. OIG generated an individual Combined Assessment Program report for each facility. For this report, we summarized the data collected from the individual facility Combined Assessment Program reviews. We reviewed facility RNS policies and other applicable documents, including 393 electronic health records (EHRs) of residents reported to be receiving one or more of the following RNS: Passive range of motion (ROM) Active ROM Bed mobility Transfer Walking We refer to these residents as Group 1 in the report. We identified a second group of residents for EHR review. These residents were not receiving RNS at the time of our initial facility inquiry, had been in the community living center for more than 6 weeks, and had one of the following primary diagnoses: History of cerebrovascular accident Parkinson s disease Multiple sclerosis 3 VHA Handbook 1142.01, Criteria and Standards for VA Community Living Centers (CLC), August 13, 2008. VA Office of Inspector General 2

Alzheimer s disease or dementia Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis From this list, we identified whether the selected residents had one or more functional deficits listed on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Roster/Sample Matrix form (CMS-802) 4 report in the following categories: Bedfast Activities of daily living decline/concern ROM/contracture/positioning Given these factors, an additional 189 residents appeared to be potential candidates for RNS. We refer to these residents as Group 2 in the report. We reviewed 360 nursing employee training and competency records. Additionally, we completed 118 meal observations to assess the provision of 526 assistive eating devices care planned for residents and other selected meal and dining service requirements related to independence and dignity. The resident samples and training and competency records within each facility were not probability samples and thus do not represent the entire population of that facility. Therefore, the summary results presented in this report are not generalizable to the entire VHA. Inspectors conducted the reviews in accordance with Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation published by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. 4 The facility generates the CMS-802 report, which includes all current residents and their pertinent care categories. VA Office of Inspector General 3

Inspection Results We noted high compliance in many areas, including provision of assistive eating devices to residents during meals, timeliness of tray setup, dining atmosphere, and honoring resident preference. However, we identified opportunities for improvement in four areas. Issue 1: Residents Not Receiving RNS CMS requires documentation of the CAA process to assure continuity of care and to identify changes in a resident s condition. Clinicians must assess each triggered care area, but the care area triggered may or may not represent a condition that the care plan should address. The interdisciplinary team members should clearly document what information from the assessment led to their care planning decision to provide or not provide RNS. The Group 2 EHR review indicated that 132 of the 189 residents (70 percent) did not receive RNS during the 30 days prior to the time of the EHR review. Of these, clinicians did not document the reason the resident was not receiving RNS for 21 residents (16 percent) and did not document other activities to promote the resident s functional status for 41 residents (31 percent). We recommended that for residents who may be candidates for RNS, the interdisciplinary team documents the reason the resident is not receiving the services or other activities to promote functional status. Issue 2: Care Plan Development and Implementation The JC requires a written plan based on data gathered during assessment that identifies care needs and treatment goals, describes the strategy for meeting those needs and goals, outlines the criteria for terminating any interventions, and documents progress toward meeting the plan s objectives. The JC also requires medical record documentation of nursing care provided based on the interdisciplinary care plan. We reviewed each Group 1 resident s care plan to determine whether restorative nursing goals related to passive and active ROM, bed mobility, transfer, and/or walking were included. We also obtained from the care plan the interdisciplinary team s planned interventions to accomplish the goals. We determined whether restorative nursing employees provided planned interventions, and if interventions were not completed, we sought documented reasons. For example, employees may have been unable to complete a planned intervention because of the resident s condition, refusal, or other treatment obligation such as a planned procedure. Eight of 76 applicable residents (11 percent) in Group 1 who were receiving or supposed to receive transfer RNS did not have transfer goals in their care plans. For 102 of the applicable 390 residents (26 percent), employees did not consistently provide VA Office of Inspector General 4

RNS 5 in accordance with the resident s care plan and/or consistently document when they did provide services. (Three residents had received RNS, but no goals were documented on the care plans.) Employees did not document a reason why they did not provide services for 87 residents. We recommended that for residents receiving or supposed to receive RNS, the interdisciplinary team documents goals in their care plans and that nursing employees provide and document services in accordance with the care plan, and if they do not provide the services, they document the reason. Issue 3: Documentation and Care Plan Reassessment The JC requires that nursing employees document a summary of the resident s condition in the interdisciplinary care plan. The summary must include the status of nursing goals. Employees need to document in a way that contributes to communication of a resident s problems, monitors their ongoing condition, and records treatment and response to treatment. Forty-four of the 45 facilities (98 percent) that offered RNS had local policies regarding documentation. Facilities required employees to document summary notes at regular intervals, and we assessed compliance. We also determined whether notes reflected resident progress toward restorative nursing goals. For those residents not meeting goals, we determined whether employees reassessed the resident care plan and/or revised goals and interventions. For Group 1, EHR reviews revealed that employees did not consistently complete required summary notes for 88 of 385 applicable residents (23 percent). (For eight residents, insufficient time had passed for employees to complete the initial summary note.) Of the 87 EHRs that showed the resident was not progressing toward restorative nursing goals, 61 (70 percent) did not contain documentation that employees reassessed the care plan and/or modified interventions and goals. RNS ensures that each resident maintains his or her maximum functional capacity as outlined in the care plan. Upon discharge from therapy, a therapist develops a restorative care plan for nursing employees to administer. The JC requires facilities to establish a process for hand-off communication between employees of such information as care, treatment, and further services required. We reviewed the EHRs of Group 1 residents discharged from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapy services 6 during the previous 6 months from the date of the EHR review. We determined whether the therapist documented hand-off communication. Additionally, for those not receiving RNS after discharge from therapy, we evaluated the EHR to determine whether employees documented a reason for not referring to RNS. 5 We considered services to be provided if the care planned interventions were documented more than 50 percent of the time. 6 Includes physical therapy, occupational therapy, and/or kinesiotherapy. VA Office of Inspector General 5

Of the 89 residents who received RNS after discharge from therapy, 17 EHRs (19 percent) did not contain evidence of hand-off communication between the therapist and nursing employees responsible for continuing interventions. Of the 12 residents who did not receive RNS after discharge from therapy, three EHRs (25 percent) did not contain documentation indicating why RNS were not ordered. We recommended that employees complete required restorative summary notes and that the Associate Chief Nurse or designee monitor compliance. We also recommended that for residents not progressing toward restorative goals, the interdisciplinary team reassess the resident care plan and/or adjust goals and interventions. Additionally, we recommended that facility managers ensure that Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapists discharging residents from therapy document hand-off communication with nursing employees to ensure interventions continue or are discontinued, as applicable. Issue 4: Nursing Employee Training for Restorative Care The JC requires that employees participate in education and training specific to the needs of the facility s patient population and that these activities are documented. CMS requires that facilities train nursing employees in the restorative nursing program techniques that promote resident involvement. We reviewed nursing employee training on ROM and transfer techniques. Of the 360 nursing employee training records reviewed, 47 (13 percent) did not contain documentation of ROM training, and 49 (14 percent) did not contain documentation of transfer training. We recommended that facility managers provide and document nursing employee training on ROM and transfers. Conclusions We noted high compliance with VHA policy, the CMS, and JC standards in many areas, including provision of assistive eating devices to residents during meals and selected dining service requirements such as timeliness of tray setup, dining atmosphere, and honoring resident preference. We identified opportunities for improvement in the CAA process and care plan development, implementation, and reassessment. Facilities needed to improve documentation of reasons residents were not receiving RNS or other activities to promote functional status, care plan goals, provision of RNS, summary notes, and hand-off communication. Finally, facilities needed to provide and document employee training on ROM and transfer techniques. VA Office of Inspector General 6

Recommendations 1. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents who may be candidates for restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents the reason the resident is not receiving the services or other activities to promote functional status. 2. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents receiving or supposed to receive restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents goals in their care plans. 3. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that nursing employees provide and document restorative nursing services in accordance with the care plan, and if they do not provide the services, they document the reason. 4. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that employees complete required restorative summary notes and that the Associate Chief Nurse or designee monitors compliance. 5. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents not progressing toward restorative goals, the interdisciplinary team reassesses the resident care plan and/or adjusts goals and interventions as necessary. 6. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapists discharging residents from therapy document hand-off communication with nursing employees to ensure interventions continue or are discontinued, as applicable. 7. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that facility managers provide and document nursing employee training on range of motion and transfers. VA Office of Inspector General 7

Appendix A Interim Under Secretary for Health Comments Department of Veterans Affairs Memorandum Date: May 14, 2015 From: Interim Under Secretary for Health (10) Subject: Office of Inspector General (OIG) Draft Report, Combined Assessment Program (CAP) Summary Report: Evaluation of Selected Requirements in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Community Living Centers (2015-01721-HI-0565) (VAIQ 7585351) To: Assistant Inspector General for Healthcare Inspections (54) 1. Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft OIG CAP Summary Report: Evaluation of Community Living Centers in VHA Facilities. 2. I concur with the report and the recommendations. Attached is VHA s corrective action plan for recommendations 1 through 7. 3. Should you have any questions, please contact Karen M. Rasmussen, MD, Director, Management Review Service (10AR) at VHA10ARMRS2@va.gov. Attachment VA Office of Inspector General 8

VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (VHA) Action Plan CAP Summary Report Evaluation of Selected Requirements in VHA Community Living Centers Date of Draft Report: March 19, 2015 Recommendations/ Status Completion Actions Date OIG Recommendations Recommendation 1. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents who may be candidates for restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents the reason the resident is not receiving the services or other activities to promote functional status. VHA Comments: Concur The Geriatrics and Extended Care (GEC) in collaboration with the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Operations and Management (DUSHOM) will implement a standardized process for facility and Veteran Integrated Service Network (VISN) Directors to assess and report local compliance with requirements identified in recommendations 1 7. The standardized process for assessing and reporting on local compliance will include the following elements: 1. GEC will conduct a series of information calls for VISN and VA Medical Center leaders (VAMC) that clarify requirements underlying recommendations 1 7 of this report. The calls will also introduce the audit tool, explain usage of the tool, explain reporting requirements, and provide GEC point of contact for technical assistance. 2. GEC will develop and distribute a VISN and facility focused standardized audit tool to assess compliance with standards identified in recommendations 1 7 of this report. GEC will provide the Office of the DUSHOM with a memorandum for distribution to VISNs and facilities that directs them on the purpose, use of, access to, and reporting requirements for the standardized audit tool. GEC in collaboration with the Office of the DUSHOM will provide direction to VISN and facility Directors on the requirements to complete this action plan. The DUSHOM will require all facilities to use the standardized audit tool for documenting compliance with these recommendations. The DUSHOM will require VISN directors to ensure facilities have local processes in place to report compliance to GEC. VA Office of Inspector General 9

VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance with recommendations 1 7. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement to ensure that for residents who may be candidates for restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents the reason the resident is not receiving the services or other activities to promote functional status. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents who appear to be candidates for restorative nursing services but not receiving them. The record reviews will assess for documentation of reasons the residents who appear to be candidates for restorative nursing services are not receiving them or that there is documentation of other activities provided to promote residents functional status. Record reviews will continue until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. The written presentation materials, the call titles, and the dates calls were held. 2. The audit tool. 3. The distributed memorandum from the DUSHOM. 4. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 Recommendation 2. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents receiving or supposed to receive restorative nursing services, the interdisciplinary team documents goals in their care plans. VHA Comments: Concur VA Office of Inspector General 10

Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement that the interdisciplinary team document restorative nursing service goals in the resident s care plan. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents that are receiving restorative nursing services until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. The record reviews will assess for documentation of goals in the care plan. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 90 percent of records reviewed at each facility contain required documentation. 2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 Recommendation 3. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that nursing employees provide and document restorative nursing services in accordance with the care plan, and if they do not provide the services, they document the reason. VHA Comments: Concur Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement that nursing employees provide and document restorative nursing services in accordance with the care plan, and if they do not provide the services, they document the reason. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents that are receiving restorative nursing services until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. VA Office of Inspector General 11

VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 90 percent of records reviewed at each facility contain required documentation. 2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 Recommendation 4. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that employees complete required restorative summary notes and that the Associate Chief Nurse or designee monitors compliance. VHA Comments: Concur Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement that that employees complete required restorative summary notes. To accomplish this, the following process will be used. 1. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents that are receiving restorative services to ensure that restorative summary notes are completed until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. The record reviews will assess for documentation of goals in the care plan. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 90 percent of records reviewed at each facility contain required documentation. VA Office of Inspector General 12

2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 Recommendation 5. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that for residents not progressing toward restorative goals, the interdisciplinary team reassesses the resident care plan and/or adjusts goals and interventions as necessary. VHA Comments: Concur Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement that nursing employees provide and document restorative nursing services in accordance with the care plan, and for residents not progressing toward restorative goals, the interdisciplinary team reassesses the resident care plan and/or adjusts goals and interventions as necessary. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents that are receiving restorative nursing services until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. The record reviews will assess for documentation of goals in the care plan. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through the Office of the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 90 percent of records reviewed at each facility contain required documentation. 2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 VA Office of Inspector General 13

Recommendation 6. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapists discharging residents from therapy document hand-off communication with nursing employees to ensure interventions continue or are discontinued, as applicable. VHA Comments: Concur Actions to address this recommendation are: VHA requires 90 percent compliance with the requirement that Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation therapists discharging residents from therapy document hand-off communication with nursing employees to ensure interventions continue or are discontinued, as applicable. Through the Office of the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities conduct quarterly record reviews of a representative sample of records of residents that are receiving restorative nursing services until 90 percent compliance is met for the quarter. The record reviews will assess for documentation of goals in the care plan. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through the Office of the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this documentation standard are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 90 percent of records reviewed at each facility contain required documentation. 2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented how monitoring of documentation compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process June 2016 Recommendation 7. We recommended that the Interim Under Secretary for Health, in conjunction with Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders, ensure that facility managers provide and document nursing employee training on range of motion and transfers. VHA Comments: Concur VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Nursing collaborate to develop a competency and provide training on range of motion and transfers to all Community Living Centers (CLC) nursing employees. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN VA Office of Inspector General 14

Directors to ensure that facility Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Nursing collaborate to develop a competency and provide training for all current CLC nursing employees on range of motion and transfers to all CLC nursing employees. A process will also be developed to incorporate this training into new employee orientation. VHA requires 100 percent compliance with the requirement that a process is developed for facility managers to monitor compliance. Through the DUSHOM, GEC will release a memorandum requiring VISN Directors to ensure facilities develop a process for facility managers to monitor compliance. GEC recommends reports from monitoring of compliance with this training are submitted to facility Quality Management for additional action as needed. To complete this action, GEC will provide the following documentation: 1. VISN reporting that demonstrates 100 percent of nursing employees receive training in range of motion and transfers. 2. VISN Attestation results demonstrating that 100 percent of facilities have documented training, have implemented a process to incorporate this training into new employee orientation and how compliance will occur and how it will be reported at the local level. Status: Target Completion Date: In Process October 2015 VA Office of Inspector General 15

Appendix B Office of Inspector General Contact and Staff Acknowledgments Contact Contributors Other Contributors For more information about this report, please contact the OIG at (202) 461-4720. Clarissa Reynolds, CNHA, MBA, Project Coordinator Annette Acosta, MN, RN Lisa Barnes, MSW Michael Bishop, MSW Debra Boyd-Seale, RN, PhD Margie Chapin, RT (R, MR, CT), JD Paula Chapman, CTRS Victoria Coates, LICSW, MBA Darlene Conde-Nadeau, MSN, ARNP Charles Cook, MHA Donna Giroux, RN Terri Julian, PhD Elaine Kahigian, RN, JD Gayle Karamanos, MS, PA-C Alison Loughran, JD, RN Carol Lukasewicz, BSN, RN Lauren Olstad, LCSW Melanie Oppat, MEd, LDN Glen Pickens, RN, MHSM Larry Selzler, MSPT Laura Snow, LCSW, MHCL Laura Spottiswood, RN, MPH Julie Story, RN, BSN Carol Torczon, MSN, ACNP Susan Tostenrude, MS Ann Ver Linden, RN, MBA Joanne Wasko, LCSW Sonia Whig, MS, LDN Jovie Yabes, RN, BSN Elizabeth Bullock Jeffrey Joppie, BS Julie Watrous, RN, MS VA Office of Inspector General 16

Appendix C VA Distribution Report Distribution Office of the Secretary Veterans Health Administration Assistant Secretaries Office of the General Counsel Office of the Medical Inspector Veterans Integrated Service Network Directors (1 23) Non-VA Distribution House Committee on Veterans Affairs House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs National Veterans Service Organizations Government Accountability Office Office of Management and Budget This report is available at www.va.gov/oig. VA Office of Inspector General 17