Real-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed



Similar documents
EPA New England Regional Laboratory. EPA Project Team: Liz McCarthy. Matt Destino Tim Bridges Dick Siscanaw

Penn State Cooperative Extension

Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future

An Introduction to Algae Measurements Using In Vivo Fluorescence

DEEP WATER MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF HYDRILLA IN WEST LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA, FLORIDA

Long-term Marine Monitoring in Willapa Bay. WA State Department of Ecology Marine Monitoring Program

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

Automated In-Situ Water Quality Monitoring Report

Water Quality in College Creek, Annapolis, MD, Dr. Peter Bergstrom, NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, FINAL 10/22/09

KHSA Interim Measure 15: Water Quality Monitoring Activities Monitoring Year 2013

How To Use A Water Quality Monitor (Wqmsw)

Lake Monitoring in Wisconsin using Satellite Remote Sensing

Self-Calibrating Remote Control Monitoring Systems

LIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY

The 3rd Busan Global Water Forum Multi-Parameter Water Quality Monitoring System. Aqua of Sep 2015 Kyung-Yup Hwang

This chapter focuses on how to collect, manage, and deliver data from a marine water quality network.

Underwater Sensor Networks for Water Quality Monitoring Project Final Report Feng Zhang

Application of Subsea Wireless Technology to Environmental Monitoring

DESWAT project (Destructive Water Abatement and Control of Water Disasters)

Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University

Algal Blooms, Circulators, Waterfowl and Eutrophic Greenfield Lake, NC. Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver, Ellen J. Wambach, and Anna R.

TANS, DEQ Website, and Modern Real-time Monitoring

Building Credibility: Quality Assurance & Quality Control for Volunteer Monitoring Programs

HOW-TO GUIDE FOR STORMWATER MONITORING

YSI Meter Protocol: Specific Conductivity, ph, & Dissolved Oxygen

Cyanobacteria, Toxins and Indicators. Field Monitoring Treatment Facility Monitoring Treatment Studies

BACTERIAL ENUMERATION

US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs

Environment Canada's Water Quality Monitoring Programs and the National Automated Monitoring Network

Appendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat

Carbon Dioxide in Fish Ponds

Getting to Know Your Watershed: Lewis Bay

Comparing Levels of Phosphates in Dishwasher Detergents

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

HIGH NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE DOUGLAS RIVER AND THEIR IMPACT ON DALY RIVER WATER QUALITY

Selection of Online Water Quality Monitoring Technologies and Station Design

An Automated Ocean and Weather Monitoring System for Use on Volunteer Observing Ships (VOS)

Data Quality. Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program

UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY

At the bottom of the screen you will also see some of our sister brands, all of which can also plug in to the Storm data logger.

PROCEDURE 1. QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR GAS CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS USED FOR COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION

DISSOLVED OXYGEN METER Model : DO-5509

Guide to Writing a Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Guidelines for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface Water Quality Programs in Alberta

COPY. Revision History: Changes were made to reflect the current practice of only including the most recent changes in the revision history.

Real-time Monitoring Platform to Improve the Drinking Water Network Efficiency

Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis of the Bennett Spring Watershed and Recharge Area

Resolution selectable from 0.01 and ph. Range ph. Accuracy ± ph

Catalase. ***You will be working with hot water, acids and bases in this laboratory*** ****Use Extreme Caution!!!****

Temporal and spatial variability in The Guadalquivir Estuary: a real- time telemetry challenge

MiCorps 101. Presented by Paul Steen. MiCorps Program Manager

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION/MAINTENANCE

Electronic Data Validation Using the Locus Environmental Information Management System. Tricia Walters Locus Technologies

Site Attendance Guidelines for Automated/Unattended Monitoring and Process Controlled Facilities

Care, Maintenance, and Storage of YSI 6-Series Probes and Sondes

Chemometric Analysis for Spectroscopy

BASELINE WATER QUALITY SAMPLING IN SHALE GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland (410)

JOCASSEE FOREBAY AND TAILWATER WATER QUALITY REPORT KEOWEE-TOXAWAY PROJECT (FERC PROJECT NO. 2503)

Deployment of networks of innovative water quality sensors for distribution network monitoring Joep van den Broeke (Ph.D.)

INSTALLATION OF AN AUTOMATED EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR ANNOTTO BAY

Temperature Data Analysis

DISSOLVED OXYGEN PROBE

AIRMoN, ph and Conductivity Field Measurement

WQX Best Practices. Dos and Don ts for Water Quality Data Destined for WQX / WQX Web. STORET User Call October 23, 2014

THE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION PROGRAM

Transcription:

Real-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed Access to the data has been through a password protected site http://www.ysieconet.com/ Project Assistance: Liz McCarthy Laura Senefeld Matt Destino Tim Bridges Dick Siscanaw

Charles and Mystic River Real-Time Monitoring EPA New England Regional Laboratory The Real-Time Monitoring Buoys are off-line for the season Purpose: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established monitoring buoys in the Charles and Mystic Watersheds. These buoys collect and transmit water quality data that is available to the public. EPA has established these buoys to help with the tracking of cyanobacteria blooms and water quality conditions. Note: All water quality measurements are collected 1 meter below the water's surface Last Sonde Verification: 9/3/21 Click here Project Partners: Disclaimer: The data presented on this website is considered preliminary data and may be subject to future revision or qualifiers. The data from this site is transmitted directly from the instrument with no or little review. Inaccuracies may be presented because instrument malfunction or physical changes at buoy location.

Wedge Pond Sonde Measurements Recorded every 15 minutes Measurement period 6/15-9/3/1 Measurements collected at 1 meter depth Parameters Temperature, Conductivity ph Dissolved oxygen Chlorophyll Phycocyanin

Buoy chlorophyll and phycocyanin correlated with Lab data Chlorophyll a EPA Contract lab DPH contract lab (Charles only) Cyanobacteria cell counts EPA Contract lab DPH contract lab (Charles only) Roger Frymire

Cells/mL Wedge Pond Phycocyanin Concentrations 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 6/15/1 6/22/1 6/29/1 7/6/1 7/13/1 7/2/1 7/27/1 8/3/1 8/1/1 8/17/1 8/24/1 8/31/1 9/7/1 9/14/1 9/21/1 9/28/1 Date

6/15/1 6/22/1 6/29/1 7/6/1 7/13/1 7/2/1 7/27/1 8/3/1 8/1/1 8/17/1 8/24/1 8/31/1 9/7/1 9/14/1 9/21/1 9/28/1 Cells/mL Wedge Pond Phycocyanin Concentrations 25 2 15 1 5 Date

(mg/l) Wedge Pond Dissolved Oxygen 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 6/15/1 6/22/1 6/29/1 7/6/1 7/13/1 7/2/1 7/27/1 8/3/1 8/1/1 8/17/1 8/24/1 8/31/1 9/7/1 9/14/1 9/21/1 9/28/1

Wedge Pond ph Measurements 1 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 6/15/1 6/22/1 6/29/1 7/6/1 7/13/1 7/2/1 7/27/1 8/3/1 8/1/1 8/17/1 8/24/1 8/31/1 9/7/1 9/14/1 9/21/1 9/28/1

5/27/1 6/3/1 6/1/1 6/17/1 6/24/1 7/1/1 7/8/1 7/15/1 7/22/1 7/29/1 8/5/1 8/12/1 8/19/1 8/26/1 9/2/1 9/9/1 9/16/1 9/23/1 9/3/1 Phycocyanin (cells/ml) 6/15/1 6/22/1 6/29/1 7/6/1 7/13/1 7/2/1 7/27/1 8/3/1 8/1/1 8/17/1 8/24/1 8/31/1 9/7/1 9/14/1 9/21/1 9/28/1 Phycocyanin (cells/ml) Wedge Pond Phycocyanin Concentrations 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Date Chalres RTM Buoy Phycocyanin Concentrations 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Date

Summary of Use and Results Evaluation user feedback was positive Most interest in tracking cyanobacteria blooms Relocating Mystic Buoy Good probe performance against calibration standards Chlorophyll probe correlated poorly with laboratory Chlorophyll a method Phycocyanin correlated good with DPH Lab and Roger Frymire but poorly with EPA contract lab.

Next steps for RTM Buoy Project Finalize and report out the validated data Plan on deploying again in the Mystic and Charles next summer Find a new location for the Mystic Buoy Investigate different calibration methods for chlorophyll and phycocyanin Cultured cells for phycocyanin Investigate Public website

Questions?

DO (mg/l) Charles RTM Buoy Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 5/27/1 6/3/1 6/1/1 6/17/1 6/24/1 7/1/1 7/8/1 7/15/1 7/22/1 7/29/1 8/5/1 Date 8/12/1 8/19/1 8/26/1 9/2/1 9/9/1 9/16/1 9/23/1 9/3/1

5/27/1 6/3/1 6/1/1 6/17/1 6/24/1 7/1/1 7/8/1 7/15/1 7/22/1 7/29/1 8/5/1 8/12/1 8/19/1 8/26/1 9/2/1 9/9/1 9/16/1 9/23/1 9/3/1 ph Charles RTM Buoy ph 1 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 Date

5/27/1 6/3/1 6/1/1 6/17/1 6/24/1 7/1/1 7/8/1 7/15/1 7/22/1 7/29/1 8/5/1 8/12/1 8/19/1 8/26/1 9/2/1 9/9/1 9/16/1 9/23/1 9/3/1 Phycocyanin (cells/ml) 35 Charles RTM Buoy Phycocyanin Corrected (w/dph values) Concentrations 3 25 RTM Buoy Corrected DPH cell counts 2 15 1 5 Date

Phycocyanin (cells/ml) Charles RTM Buoy Daily Max Phycocyanin corrected (DPH) values 35 3 25 72 days above 7, 55 days equal to or below 7, 2 15 1 5 5/27/1 6/3/1 6/1/1 6/17/1 6/24/1 7/1/1 7/8/1 7/15/1 7/22/1 7/29/1 Date 8/5/1 8/12/1 8/19/1 8/26/1 9/2/1 9/9/1 9/16/1 9/23/1 9/3/1

Phycocyanin probe (cells/ml) Phycocyanin probe (cells/ml) Phycocyanin probe (cells/ml) Phycocyanin probe (cells/ml) Phycocyanin probe correlation with Laboratory Cyanobacteria cell counts 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 LSSU (EPA contract lab) cyanobacteria cell counts Vs Phycocyanin Probe With two outlier removed (Charles and Mystic data) y =.353x + 2752.8 R 2 =.4679 5 1 15 2 25 3-2 LSSU cell counts (cells/ml) 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Roger Frymirecyanobacteria cell counts Vs Phycocyanin Probe (Charles and Mystic data) y =.69x + 244.5 R 2 =.983 1 2 3 4 5 6 RF cell counts (cells/ml) 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, DPH contract lab cyanobacteria cell counts Vs. Phycocyanin probe Charles River data y =.1364x + 2463.9 R 2 =.7417 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, 3, Total (DPH) Cell Count 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Roger Frymire cyanobacteria cell counts Vs Phycocyanin Probe With high point removed (Charles and Mystic data) y =.555x + 2642 R 2 =.7539 2 4 6 8 1 12 RF cell counts (cells/ml) Note: DPH samples collected ~35 feet away at dock 6 deep

Probe Chlorophyl (ug/l) Chlorophyll probe (ug/l) Chlorophyll probe had poor correlation with Laboratory data 5 45 4 Chlorophyll a (EPA contract Lab) Vs. Chlorophyll Probe (with one outlier and data not meeting QC removed) Charles and Mystic data 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 y =.3243x + 3.2892 R 2 =.2182 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lab Chlorophyll a (ug/l) 4 Chlorophyll a (DPH contract lab) Vs. Chlorphyll probe Charles River data 35 3 25 2 y =.341x + 12.98 R 2 =.3 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 DPH Chlorophyll a values (ug/l)

RTM BUOY water Temperature (C) RTM Buoy Turbidity (NTU) RTM Buoy Sp. Cond. (us/cm) RTM Buoy Optical DO (mg/l) RTM Buoy ph Other parameter comparisons with DPH and RTM Buoy DPH Dissolved Oxygen Vs. Optical Dissolved Oxygen Probe DPH ph Vs. ph Probe 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 y =.3242x + 6.578 R 2 =.1519 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 DPH Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) 1 y = 1.339x - 3.2119 9.5 R 2 =.851 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 1 DPH ph DPH Water Temperature Vs. Probe Water Temperature DPH Conductivity Vs. Probe Conductivity DPH Turbidity Vs. Probe Turbidity 32 7 3 3 25 6 28 2 5 26 24 y = 1.36x -.264 4 R 2 =.9792 3 15 1 y =.8791x + 321.35 R 2 =.9123 22 2 5 y =.2436x + 2.7786 R 2 =.847 2 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3 31 5 1 15 2 25 3 DPH Water Temperature (C) 1 2 3 4 5 DPH Conductivity (us/cm) 6 7 DPH Turbidity (NTU)