Patient Centric Monitoring Methodology



Similar documents
An information platform that delivers clinical studies better, faster, safer and more cost effectively

Welcome to the training on the TransCelerate approach to Risk-Based Monitoring. This course will take you through five modules of information to

Risk based monitoring using integrated clinical development platform

through advances in risk-based

1

Monitoring Clinical Trials with a SAS Risk-Based Approach

Barnett International and CHI's Inaugural Clinical Trial Oversight Summit June 4-7, 2012 Omni Parker House Boston, MA

Model Approach for Risk-Based Monitoring

PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM Q10

The Role of the CRO in Effective Risk-Based Monitoring

RBM as Competitive Advantage for Mid-sized CROs

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Role Purpose. Key Challenges. Key Result Areas

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Quality Management in Clinical Trials

Quality by Design Concept

Sharon H. Johnson, BS, MS 123 Main Street Capital City, VA Phone:

Managing Clinical Trial Risk: It's a Tough Job, But One Person Has To Do It

Why Monitoring Is More Than Just SDV

Managing Clinical Operations Risks. Lars Schmiedeberg

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR DEPOSIT-TAKERS. Operational Risk Management. March 2012

CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OPTIMIZATION

ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system

Site monitoring Transformed forever?

Moving from Compliance to Competency for the Clinical Research Professional

Guidance for Industry. Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System

Adopting Site Quality Management to Optimize Risk-Based Monitoring

Position Paper: Risk-Based Monitoring Methodology

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Clinical trials management systems - a review

EFPIA Principles for the Development of the EU Clinical Trials Portal and Database

Agile Master Data Management TM : Data Governance in Action. A whitepaper by First San Francisco Partners

Section 1 Project Management, Project Communication/Process Design, Mgmt, Documentation, Definition & Scope /CRO-Sponsor Partnership

Workshop on Quality Risk Management Making Trials Fit for Purpose

Using ISO as an Audit Tool

White Paper January Top Ten Reports in Clinical Performance Management

Clinical Research Nurse (CRN)

Pharmaceutical Quality & Clinical Research Quality: The Interaction

Industry Experience in Clinical Trials Management. Catherine Lee Area Head Clinical Operations Asia Pfizer Inc 20 May 2011 Brussels

Job Profile Clinical Research Associate III (CRA)

Avg cost of a complex trial $100mn. Avg cost per patient for a Phase III Study

GOVERNANCE AND THE EHR4CR INSTITUTE

ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION

NSW Government ICT Benefits Realisation and Project Management Guidance

Quality Risk Management The Pharmaceutical Experience Ann O Mahony Quality Assurance Specialist Pfizer Biotech Grange Castle

The Monitoring Visit. Denise Owensby, CCRP Sr. Clinical Research Coordinator Clinical & Translational Science Center University of California, Davis

EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE

The role, duties and responsibilities of clinical trials personnel Monitoring: rules and recommendations

Clinical Research in Mauritius

What We Are..!

Beyond SDV: Enabling Holistic, Strategic Risk-Based Monitoring

CLINICAL TRIALS WITH MEDICINES IN EUROPE

Oversight of Clinical Trials in Europe - Member State perspective. Gunnar Danielsson Senior Expert Pharmaceutical Inspector

CLINICAL RESEARCH GENERIC TASK DESCRIPTIONS

ISRS. For the health of your business SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

EMA Clinical Laboratory Guidance - Key points and Clarifications PAUL STEWART

CLINICAL DATA MONITORING PLAN (CDMoP) PROTOCOL # [0000] [TITLE]

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff FDA Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies Not Conducted Under an IND Frequently Asked Questions

A Best Practice Guide

VISION FOR LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Core Training Outline

Transforming CliniCal Trials: The ability to aggregate and Visualize Data Efficiently to make impactful Decisions

OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Clinical Trials

Second Clinical Safety Review of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) June 2013

Comparative analysis between the possible regulatory approaches to GMP compliance TITOLO PRESENTAZIONE

GSN Cloud Contact Centre Partnership Datasheet

The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency

Execution in Clinical Research

P3M3 Portfolio Management Self-Assessment

How To Change Medicine

EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL PHARMACISTS GROUP

Marie-Claire Rickard, GCP & Governance Manager Rachel Fay, GCP & Governance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Operations Manager

MEDICAL DEVICE & DIAGNOSTICS

INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE

This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled.

Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials

History and Principles of Good Clinical Practice

DATA QUALITY MATURITY

A Model for Centralized Monitoring & Clinical Data Management Reducing costs while ensuring compliance, risk mitigation & quality

Risk Based Approach to on site monitoring Do we need to check everything? Roger Newbery, VP Clinical Management EMEA, PPD

EMA Update Clinical Trials

Best Practice Approaches to Improving Clinical Supply Chain Management. Matthew Do Client Development Lead Almac Pharmaceutical Services

Phlexglobal Whitepaper

How To Inspect A Blood Bank

Business Analyst Position Description

Using CITI Program Content: Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

Introduction. The Evolution of the Data Management Role: The Clinical Data Liaison

Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards

Strong support. Remaining concerns

Final Business Plan Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality Systems dated 14 October 2005 Endorsed by the ICH SC on 10 November 2005

Hollie Goddard Sr. IRB Coordinator McKesson Specialty Health

Geoff Taylor Director, Clinical Quality Assurance, Eisai Product Creation Systems

Implementation of ANSI/AAMI/IEC Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes.

A Review of the NHSLA Incident Reporting and Management and Learning from Experience Standards. Assessment Outcomes. April March 2004

JOB DESCRIPTION. Service Desk Technician

Transcription:

Patient Centric Monitoring Methodology The ICON approach to risk based monitoring in clinical trials An ICON White Paper

Introduction The pharmaceutical and CRO industries are undergoing a radical shift in their approach to ensuring quality in the conduct of clinical trials that involves a more targeted, risk based approach to site monitoring and data handling. The primary goal of this shift is to improve the efficiency, effectiveness and quality of clinical trial research and the data generated together with improving patient safety. A significant impetus has been the recognition by regulatory agencies that traditional approaches to clinical trial monitoring are no longer sustainable in an era of global multinational studies. For example, data indicate that the 100% verification of source data has not delivered the anticipated increase in the effectiveness of clinical trial research. Recent technological advancements in electronic data handling have also enabled this revolution in clinical trial monitoring. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [1] and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [2] both issued guidance on risk based monitoring in 2013 and the principles of quality risk management are outlined in International Conference On Harmonisation (ICH) guideline Q9 [3]. The aims of the FDA and EMA guidance are to improve patients safety and data quality in clinical trials by focusing oversight on the most important aspects of study conduct and reporting. Patient Centric Monitoring is ICON s methodology for the design and execution of an adaptive risk based monitoring strategy using ICONIK analysis. In the design and execution of the monitoring strategy, ICON puts the patient at the centre of decision making. Risk based monitoring in clinical trials is a monitoring approach where activities, resources and technologies are adapted to the risks in the study. Patient Centric Monitoring further focuses on the probability of errors that matter in decision making for patients. This adaptive approach focusses monitoring activities on the areas which have the greatest potential to improve patient safety and data quality. The key benefits of Patient Centric Monitoring are proactive early detection and mitigation of risk and error together with cost effective resource deployment. Figure 1. Patient Centric, Risk Indicator Driven Monitoring The Central Monitoring Schematic Process Flow ICON - Sponsor PM/CTM Investigator Compliance verification & Root cause analysis Governance Planning & Oversight 1.Quality by Design; disease, IP, protocol 2.Design quality & risk management plan 3.Design and implement oversight Risk Indicators Data integration Patient & site data CRA Monitoring data Clinical Data Analysis Finding Resolution Central Monitoring & analysis 1.Identify outliers 2.Decision if data within governance criteria 3.Multidisciplinary review and decision if data are outside governance criteria CRA Investigator Site Monitoring 1.Onsite visit 2.Offsite visit 3.Call Planning Central Monitoring Site Monitoring 3

The ICON approach Patient Centric Monitoring is designed to prevent, detect, mitigate and learn from risks and errors in the conduct of clinical trials, whilst maintaining inspection readiness in line with regulatory guidance (Figure 1). Within the Patient Centric Monitoring framework, initial risk assessment categorization recommends an optimal monitoring strategy and the pre-empted clinical trials risks determine whether or not ICONIK central monitoring and analysis are deployed. ICONIK is a powerful integrated information platform that consolidates, standardizes and visualizes operational and clinical data from multiple sources to provide a single holistic view of all study information, enabling data review from a scientific, safety and quality standpoint at the compound level. The aim of Patient Centric Monitoring is to conduct clinical trials focused on achieving quality, defined as an absence of errors that matter in decision making for patients. Overall, the outcome of Patient Centric Monitoring is the early detection of risks, which enables effective deployment of resources which may also result in an overall reduction in costs. As part of Patient Centric Monitoring, the study team are trained to understand the patient s perspective. This enables them to appreciate why and how the tasks they perform contribute to the rights and wellbeing of the research subject and also for future patients who will use the clinical research data in order to make decisions for their health. The study team can then make decisions based on this understanding, as well as the data at hand, to deploy prioritisation, discretionary effort and escalation procedures accordingly, while maintaining robust and disciplined compliance with standard operating procedures. Prevent Detect Mitigate Learn Quality by Design of Protocol Quality of Design of Monitoring Training by Firecrest Data Management Site Monitoring ICONIK - Quality - Safety - Medial Statistics Risk Review Analysis Decision Action Adapt Plan Continuous Learning Training Maintain archive of errors Inspection Readiness Patient Centric Monitoring Prevent Prevention involves these main components: A Quality by Design approach to the study protocol and monitoring strategy A tailored, practical, on-line training tool for investigators: Firecrest Prevention is first achieved through the study protocol, using a Quality by Design. This involves a cross functional team conducting an in-depth scientific as well as compliance risk review. Where possible, investigator and patient perspectives are considered in order to improve the protocol and maximize the support to investigational sites in achieving compliance with study processes. The next step in effective prevention and achievement of high quality data is effective staff training. Within the Patient Centric Monitoring framework, the Firecrest training solution, offers customised, study specific, web-based training modules to deliver training to site staff and the study team. Investigator led development teams generate dynamic and engaging training solutions to facilitate training to both site staff and study team. Training is self-paced and customised for each participant type. Firecrest enables efficient prevention of risks and errors, through its effective up-to-date training and guidance to site staff. It also fosters timely mitigation of risks and errors at sites through time sensitive delivery of updated information and communications to site staff. The third component of effective prevention is a tailored monitoring strategy, focused on the risk to safety, 4

the overall risk of error and the risk of possible lack of compliance with ethical principles and regulations. The design of Patient Centric Monitoring starts with a thorough risk assessment within a Quality by Design framework, which drives the development of an integrated quality and risk management plan (IQRMP). As part of the IQRMP, a study specific monitoring strategy is deployed that is supported by systems and processes for error checking and tracking. Risk assessment is the basis for a holistic monitoring strategy and oversight plan, encompassing risk indicators with thresholds and triggers as well as a predefined baseline monitoring schedule, which are designed to enable the discovery of risks and/ or consistent errors. The pro-active anticipation of risks and errors is incorporated in an Error Management Plan (EMP) that lists possible errors for each study activity with instructions for their prevention, detection and mitigation. A study risk assessment includes a number of steps. A protocol event risk assessment, consisting of a definition of critical data and a thorough analysis of possible errors in processes and protocol procedures at the investigator site; with the identification of study specific risks and the choice of the most effective monitoring strategy for each of these risks. The creation of a monitoring manual, including a tailored schedule of on-site and off-site monitoring, central monitoring, safety monitoring and the flexible use of additional targeted monitoring activities. Detect Patient Centric Monitoring enables the design of an effective detection methodology for quality, integrity, safety and performance risks and errors by bringing central and site monitoring together in an optimal technology, people and process paradigm. Central monitoring focuses on centrally available data, in aggregated visualisations or individual sets. Site monitoring focuses on direct or virtual interactions with the investigator sites. Central monitoring follows the instructions of the Error Management Plan (EMP) and associated Central Monitoring Plan. ICONIK provides efficient visualisations that are deployed for the detection of quality, integrity, safety and performance risks and errors with aggregated data that enable ongoing analysis of study progress. ICONIK interrogates data in real time to detect site-to-site variations and to help direct the use of resources. For errors, quality, integrity and performance verification, Clinical Data Analysts (CDAs) perform a non-medical review and analysis of ICONIK TM centralised, aggregated data in order to identify triggers in risk indicators at an early stage. The CDAs identify indications that a site is an outlier as compared to their peers in terms of quality, safety or performance. CDAs may also oversee the central monitoring of study data quality edit check trends, specific logistics, training trends and essential document filing compliance. When a CDA detects an outlier site, or an indication of risk or systematic error, they issue a finding to the CRA. For safety and medical trends, Medical Monitors perform trend analysis to identify safety risks to the research subjects. For data quality, Data Management promptly verifies data edit checks and trends in data edit checks. Site monitoring also follows the instructions of the Monitoring Manual and associated EMP. CRAs liaise with site staff to follow-up on site requests and support regulatory, logistical and documentation processes. Through regular contacts via email and telephone, the CRA can promptly support the site to ensure compliance with protocol processes and procedures and timely entry of subject data. Regular contact with the site also helps to build trust, enabling early sharing of detected errors or risks. CRAs detect errors through Source Data Verification, Source Data Review and/or interviews. A baseline schedule of structured, planned on-site or off-site visits enables the minimum established verification of errors as per the instructions in the Monitoring Manual. An Error Capture and Analysis/Action Tool (ECAT) enables CRAs to systematically check records and categorize any errors that occur at a site. Should significant errors or risks be detected by the CRA or a finding be issued by the CDA, the Monitoring Manual then directs the CRA to verify additional study events and deploy triggered on-site or off-site visits or calls in order to mitigate the detected risk. Mitigate Effective root cause analysis facilitates the identification of the causes of errors and risks which, if corrected, will prevent an error or risk from happening again. This can then guide mitigation and allow tracking in a quality register. The categorisation of errors enables consistency and focus for corrective and preventive actions at a site, project and corporate level. Errors are categorised into seven human factor categories: process, training, supervision, engineering, communication, resource allocation and culture. When a CRA or SMA detects a risk or error or a CDA issues a finding for the CRA to follow-up, action is undertaken as guided by the monitoring manual. Actions include simple correction, verification of a repeat error and root cause analysis with human factor categorisation for effective mitigation and escalation. 5

Detected errors, their root cause analysis, human factor classification and mitigation are documented in ECAT or the Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS). At an agreed frequency, holistic Quality and Risk Review Meetings (QRRMs) are held to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of the chosen monitoring strategy. The purpose of the QRRM is to review and maintain oversight of the risks and errors that are detected and mitigated during the study. Project oversight meetings are held regularly with the cross-functional project team in order to adapt the monitoring strategy, the EMP and/ or the resources allocated to the sites, countries or overall study. Learn Based on the outcome of a QRRM, the project team can issue a lessons learned item to the study team or across the organisation if necessary. A QRRM may also lead to the development or update of study or corporate training content. The EMP template is updated with any new risks identified on an ongoing basis. ICON maintains an archive of risks and errors so that future studies can avoid making similar mistakes by implementing effective preventive action. Any new risks or errors detected via the QRRM are added to the error and risk archive. References 1.U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry. Oversight of clinical investigations a risk based approach to monitoring. August 2013. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ UCM269919.pdf. 2.European Medicines Agency (EMA). Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials. 18 November 2013. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_gb/document_ library/scientific_guideline/2013/11/wc500155491.pdf. 3.International Conference On Harmonisation Of Technical Requirements For Registration Of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Quality risk management. Q9. Current Step 4 version dated 9 November 2005. Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/public_web_site/ich_ Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q9/Step4/Q9_Guideline.pdf. 4.Transcelerate Website. www.transceleratebiopharmainc.com/ Conclusion ICON s Patient Centric Monitoring is fully aligned with the guidance on risk based monitoring issued by the FDA and EMA, as well as TransCelerate. By applying technological innovations and recent behavioral sciences, Patient Centric Monitoring enables faster data access and quality checks, enabling early detection of errors and risks and ensuring improved patient safety plus data quality and integrity. Patient Centric Monitoring can also improve cost effectiveness compared with traditional monitoring techniques. 6

ICON plc Corporate Headquarters South County Business Park Leopardstown, Dublin 18 Ireland T: +353 1 291 2000 F: +353 1 291 2700 info@iconplc.com For more information on Patient Centric Monitoring please contact: Clara Heering: Clara.Heering@iconplc.com Ian O Shaughnessy: Ian.OShaughnessy@iconplc.com ICONplc.com