CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

Similar documents
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE

Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment

AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.

Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.

PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007

County of San Diego Public Safety Realignment & Post-Release Community Supervision. Preliminary 2011 Implementation Plan

New Directions. A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

Data Management Plan. County of Sonoma CCP Data Management and Evaluation Sub-committee

Criminal Justice Realignment Frequently Asked Questions 1 (Revised April 2014)

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill:

Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013

Contra Costa County: A Model for Managing Local Corrections

Adult Probation Frequently Asked Questions

Performance Metrics for Community Corrections

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

A Model for Managing Local Corrections

How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor

How To Get A Prison Sentence In California

CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender

COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY

2015 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. Utah Sentencing Commission Jennifer Valencia, Director Office (801) Cell (801)

Fresno County Public Safety Realignment: One Year of Data. Interim Report

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS

Community Corrections Partnership AB 109/117 Implementation Plan

District of Columbia Truth-in-Sentencing Commission 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, AC

How To Change The Way A Prison System Works

httpjlceo.lacounty.gov

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

It s all apples and oranges. January 31, 2012 Nathan Brady OLRGC

It s time to shift gears on criminal justice VOTER

CRIMINAL JUSTICE GLOSSARY

SENATE BILL No. 123 page 2

Maryland Courts, Criminal Justice, and Civil Matters

Preprinted Logo will go here

The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.

LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT

THE SAN DIEGO. Reentry Roundtable. Recommendations to Assembly Select Committee on Justice Reinvestment

Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION

PAROLE/PROBATION OFFICER

SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL

Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update. Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice

ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *

REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2014: CALIFORNIA S VIOLENT CRIME IN DECLINE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Practioner Guide to HB 585. Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force

Most states juvenile justice systems have

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Stuart Jenkins, Director 8610 Shoal Creek Boulevard Austin, Texas 78757

Evaluation of the Performance of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Tier Programs

California s Criminal Justice System. A Primer

Table. (Click on the table number to go to corresponding table)

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

How does AB 109 affect reduction of charges from felony misdemeanor and expungement? 1

SMART JUSTICE STRATEGIES ISSUE BRIEF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS INCREASING PUBLIC SAFETY AND REDUCING COSTS IN CALIFORNIA

Governor Jennifer M. Granholm,

Criminal Justice in Nevada Part I: Overview

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Justice Reinvestment in New Hampshire

IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]

WHAT IS CAUSING PRISON OVERCROWDING?

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

Virginia State Crime Commission s Sex Offender Task Force

Issue Brief. Arizona State Senate ARIZONA SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION INTRODUCTION ADAM WALSH ACT. November 23, 2009.

Responsibilities. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Governor, State of California. Helping California Crime Victims Since 1965

Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum

Probation and Parole Violations State Responses

Orange County Public Safety Realignment and Postrelease Community Supervision:

Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference: Community Safety and Crime Reduction via Successful Offender Re-entry into the Community

Realignment Cheat Sheet

Population Challenges at the Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (DRC) Analyst: Kevin Stockdale, OBM

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

HB 2170 Frequently Asked Questions

Evaluation of the San Diego County Community Corrections Programs

ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE

Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes

CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET

The Second Chance Act Frequently Asked Questions

JFA Institute Conducting Justice and Corrections Research for Effective Policy Making

Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014

FACT SHEET. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System. Christopher Hartney

REDUCING STATEWIDE RECIDIVISM: CHECKLIST FOR STATE REENTRY COORDINATORS

In many jurisdictions, state and local government

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR BOTH PRE-CHARGE AND POST-CHARGE DIVERSION: 1. Admit guilt and acknowledge responsibility for their action.

Transcription:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs erin.sasse@cdcr.ca.gov (916) 445-4950

WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT?

PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 3 Shifts custody of felons sentenced for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenses to county control unless excluded by statute Establishes Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Changes state parole revocation process Tasks local communities with planning for the change and implementation of local plans Funded by diverted state sales tax, specified vehicle license fee proceeds, and some state General Fund dollars

WHY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT?

COSTLY LAWSUITS FACED BY CDCR LEGAL HISTORY Coleman 1995: Court found CDCR to be deliberately indifferent to the mental health needs of inmates, in violation of the 8 th Amendment Plata 2002: Medical care in California s prisons violate the 8 th Amendment

CIVIL LAWSUITS FACED BY CDCR LEGAL HISTORY (CONT D) Three-Judge Court 2007: Overcrowding is the primary cause of the unconstitutional conditions in California s prisons The only way to address overcrowding: REDUCE THE PRISON POPULATION U.S. Supreme Court May 23, 2011: Affirmed Three-Judge Court order by 5-4 decision.

REALIGNMENT: THE SAFEST WAY TO ACHIEVE REDUCTIONS Status quo of cycling offenders in and out of prisons is wasteful, exacerbates overcrowding, and does not rehabilitate or help to reduce recidivism Without Realignment, the Alternative would be: Early Release of Prisoners

THREE-JUDGE COURT ORDER California is mandated to reduce its prison population to approximately 110,000 inmates by June 27, 2013 (~ 33,000 inmates): Staggered Targets By June 2010: o Reduce Overcrowding to 167% of Design Capacity By December 2010: o Reduce Overcrowding to 155% of Design Capacity By June 2011: o Reduce Overcrowding to 147% of Design Capacity By December 2011: o Reduce Overcrowding to 137.5%

THREE-JUDGE COURT ORDER

CDCR S ALL-TIME POPULATION HIGH As of October 25, 2006: o 173,479 Inmates o 159,977 in Institutions (excluding camps) Institutional Design Capacity: o 79,828 Beds o Overcrowding Rate: 200.4 % 10

CDCR S CURRENT POPULATION As of September 21, 2011: o 160,788 inmates o 144,256 in institutions (excluding camps) Design Capacity: o 79,650 Beds o Overcrowding Rate: 181 % 11

REALIGNMENT FUNDING AB 109 provides dedicated and on-going revenue stream to counties. The only piece that is temporary: Allocation of these revenues to individual counties. Constitutional amendment, when approved by either voter initiative or legislative action, will provide for permanent allocation of funds.

1 3 SENTENCING AND CUSTODY

WHO IS SENTENCED TO COUNTY JAIL (i.e., is not eligible for prison)? Current and Prior Non-Non-Nons (who do not otherwise have disqualifying offenses) Non-violent felons Non-serious felons Non-sex offenders Revises the definition of felony to include certain crimes that are punishable by jail Maintains length of sentence 14

15 LOCAL POPULATION MANAGEMENT TOOLS Home Detention for Low-Level Offenders Alternative Custody Contract Beds With CDCR including Fire Camps With other counties; With public Community Correctional Facilities (CCFs); However, counties may not contract back for parole revocations.

ADDITIONAL SENTENCING CONSIDERATIONS Local Jail Credits like Current Prison Credits (Day-for-Day) Split Sentence Allows courts to impose a split sentence to mandate supervision as part of county low level offenders sentence No good time credits for the supervision portion but does apply to the custody portion Not probation, not parole, not PRCS no other statutory guidance or rules of court at this time 16

WHO IS SENTENCED TO STATE PRISON? Offenders whose sentences must be served in state prison include: Those who commit a current or prior serious or violent felony; Those who are required to register as a sex offender; Those with PC 186.11 (white collar crime) sentence enhancements; Excludes other specified crimes: felony physical abuse of an elder or dependent, assault on a peace officer, possession of horse meat, and bribing a legislator 17

1 8 DETERMINING PRCS OR PAROLE

POST-RELEASE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION (PRCS) What types of offenders are being released from state prison to local supervision? Current non-violent, non-serious offenders Non-high-risk sex offenders CDCR must provide 30-day notice as to who will be released 19

PRCS (CONT D) Specifies that CDCR will have no jurisdiction over any person who is under PRCS Discharges by operation of law at the end of 3 years Individuals on PRCS may be discharged after 6 months if violation free 20

CDCR S RESPONSIBILITIES RE: PRCS Continue to advise inmates of any registration requirements Provide pre-release notifications to victims and law enforcement as required by statute Prior to an inmate being released, enter statutorily required information into the Parole Law Enforcement Automated Data System (LEADS) 21 Provide information to DOJ for entry into CLETS

PRCS PROCESS County Supervising Agency Has authority to handle all intermediate sanctions without court involvement, up to and including flash incarceration (for up to 10 consecutive days). Note: Flash incarceration is not subject to credits. May send special conditions to CDCR prior to release but must have a nexus to the offender. A peace officer may arrest an offender for violation with probable cause, but only the supervising entity can seek a warrant and approve a hold. 22

WHO REMAINS ON STATE PAROLE? 23 3 rd Strikers Offenders with a Current Serious or Violent Commitment Offense High-Risk Sex Offenders (HRSOs) Mentally Disordered Offenders (MDOs) Offenders on Parole Prior to October 1, 2011, who are not Serving a Revocation in County Jail Offenders on Active Parole Terms

PAROLE VIOLATIONS Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) retains authority over parole revocations until July 1, 2013 Same sanctions available for Parole as PRCS, including flash incarceration in county jail for up to 10 days Violations will be served in jail starting October 1, 2011 24

PAROLE VIOLATIONS (CONT D) Only persons sentenced to a term of life can be revoked back to state prison Revocations capped at 180 days in jail, per event (may receive day-for-day credits) 25 After July 1, 2013, the final revocation process will work the same for parolees as it does for PRCS (handled by the courts)

ADDITIONAL FEATURES OF REALIGNMENT AB 109 proposed limits to juvenile commitments to DJJ. AB 117 eliminated this provision Eliminates the Corrections Standards Authority and creates the new Board of State and Community Corrections Authorizes the conversion of a female prison to a male Expands limitations on allowable hospital costs for jail inmates and removes sunset date 26

CDCR REALIGNMENT RESOURCES 27

RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON-LINE CDCR s Realignment Home Page http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/index.html 28

RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON-LINE CDCR s Realignment Home Page Includes: Video Presentations and Overviews Realignment Resource Guide for Counties Handbook Time-Calculation Handbook and Information Post-Release Community Supervision Health Care Information 29 Links to Other Helpful Realignment Sites