HB 2170 Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
|
- Myra Leonard
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2013 HB 2170, enrolled version Legislative Summary of HB 2170 HB 2170 Frequently Asked Questions *References to the 2013 Supplement of the Kansas Statutes Annotated (K.S.A.) are made with the assumption that these sections will appear as amended in the enrolled version of HB 2170 when they are published later in the year. 1) How do the graduated sanctions work? Upon the first felony probation violation, the violator will be subject to a quick dip intermediate jail sanction pursuant K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(b). The quick dip can be imposed as two-day or three-day consecutive periods, not to exceed 18 total days confinement. There is no limit to how many times a quick dip sanction may be imposed. See page 12 of HB Court Services Officers or Community Corrections Officers also have the authority to impose a quick dip sanction pursuant to K.S.A Supp (s) or (t) so long as the sentencing judge has not withheld this authority at sentencing and the offender has not refused to waive the right to a violation hearing. See page 7 of HB After a quick dip sanction has been imposed by either the court or the CSO or CCO, the court may impose a 120-day sanction under K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(c) or a 180-day sanction under (c)(1)(d), up to one time each, for subsequent felony probation violations. See pages of HB After a prison sanction has been imposed pursuant to K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(c), (c)(1)(d), or both, the court may then revoke probation pursuant to (c)(1)(e). The court may also revoke pursuant to K.S.A (c)(8), regardless of any prior sanctions imposed, if the probationer commits a crime or absconds from supervision. The court may also use the override provisions of K.S.A Supp (c)(9) to bypass the graduated sanction progression and revoke the violator s probation at any time if the court sets forth with particularity the reasons for finding that public safety will be jeopardized or the welfare of the offender will not be served by another sanction. See pages of HB
2 2) Can a court impose both a 120 and 180-day sanction? Yes. The sanctions in K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(c) and (c)(1)(d) can be imposed upon felony probationers one time each, in any order, during a single probation sentence. These sanctions cannot be imposed at the same time or stacked to create a 300-day sanction. After one prison sanction under (c)(1)(c) AND one prison sanction under (c)(1)(d) have been imposed, the court must then revoke probation pursuant to (c)(1)(e). 3) If the Court Services or Community Corrections Officer wants to impose a quick dip but the probationer refuses to waive the hearing, can the court assign a 120-day or 180-day prison sanction for a first offense? No. If the court has not withheld the authority of the Court Services Officer or Community Corrections Officer to impose sanctions, the CSO or CCO may require the probationer to serve a quick dip jail sanction under K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(B), unless the probationer refuses to waive the hearing. But if the probationer refuses to waive the hearing, the CSO or CCO cannot impose the quick dip sanction without further court order and the court will be limited to imposing the quick dip sanction for the first violation. See K.S.A Supp (s) and (t) on page 7 of HB 2170 and K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(B) on page 12 of HB The court may use the override provisions of K.S.A (c)(9) to bypass the graduated sanction progression and revoke the violator s probation, but the court may not use (c)(9) to bypass the quick dip and go directly to the 120-day, (c)(1)(c), or 180-day, (c)(1)(d), sanction. See pages of HB ) Will judges be able to do anything to withhold the authority of Court Service Officers and Community Corrections Officers to administer quick dips in cases that were sentenced prior to July 1, 2013? No. The presumption is that if the authority hasn t been withheld at sentencing, CSOs and CCOs will have the ability to impose quick dips even though the district court did not have the opportunity to withhold it prior to July 1, See page 7 of HB 2170, K.S.A Supp (s)(1) and (t)(1). For crimes committed on and after July 1, 2013 there will be a specific box on the Journal Entry of Judgment that must be marked if the district court wishes to withhold this authority. 5) Will violation sanctions completed prior to July 1, 2013 count towards the new graduated sanctions? No. The provisions authorizing graduated sanctions are new law and do not apply to previous sanctions ordered prior to July 1, Therefore, a sanction ordered prior to 2
3 July 1 will not count as a quick dip, 120-day or 180-day sanction under K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(b), (c)(1)(c) or (c)(1)(d). The district court may always use the override provision of K.S.A Supp (c)(9) to revoke probation citing with particularity the offender is a public safety risk or that the welfare of the offender will not be served by such a sanction. 6) Are the new graduated sanctions applicable for violation hearings conducted on July 1, 2013? Yes. The current version of K.S.A Supp already provides the court broad authority to impose a sentence of any time period up to the original length of the sentence. After July 1, 2013 the court now has more tools in the form of additional graduated sanctions that are more specific, yet still within the court s preexisting authority. For this reason, retroactivity concerns are alleviated. However, the only sanction that will be available for first time probation violators is the quick dip jail sanction in K.S.A Supp (c)(1)(b), regardless of sanctions imposed prior to July 1, See Question #5 above. 7) Do the new graduated sanctions apply to felony DUI offenders and to nongrid felony DV cases? No. All of the nongrid offenses, including DUI, K.S.A Supp ; Test Refusal, K.S.A Supp ; Domestic battery, K.S.A Supp ; and Animal Cruelty offenses in K.S.A Supp and have their own specific statutory penalties and supervision requirements which would apply in lieu of new sanctions in K.S.A Supp These offenses do not have underlying prison sentences, so the provisions of the new graduated sanction system cannot apply. 8) Does presumptive discharge pursuant to K.S.A Supp (d) apply to the initial 12 months of probation only? No. The compliance period does not have to be the initial 12-month probation period. Once an offender has been compliant for 12 consecutive months, regardless of the length of probation, presumptive discharge is applicable. For example: An offender with a 24 month probation sentence was not compliant for the first 6 months, but then became compliant after month six. At the end of month 18 the offender would be eligible for presumptive discharge. Please note that presumptive discharge pursuant to K.S.A Supp (d) is different from supervision termination pursuant to K.S.A Supp (a). 3
4 K.S.A Supp (d) presumptive discharge applies only to low risk offenders who meet the statutory criteria, while K.S.A Supp (a) supervision termination can apply to any offender at any time. See pages 9 and 10 of HB ) Does presumptive discharge apply to people who have been in compliance for 12 months on July 1, 2013? Yes. Presumptive discharge from probation pursuant to K.S.A Supp (d) will go into effect immediately for people that have complied with probation for 12 months or more, have paid all restitution and have a risk assessment of low risk. See K.S.A Supp (d), page 10 of HB Also note that there will be a new early discharge mechanism for people serving postrelease supervision. Offenders on postrelease will be able to petition the Prisoner Review Board for release pursuant to K.S.A Supp (d)(2), but there is no presumption of release and no mandatory time period of supervision compliance for this type of release. See K.S.A Supp (d)(2), page 17 of HB ) Whose responsibility is it to notify the Court when a felony probationer is eligible for the presumptive discharge provision? The probation officer would notify the court. Some type of notice to the parties is also appropriate in the event there is an objection to the presumed discharge. 11) Until the Kansas Sentencing Commission adopts standard LSI-R cut off scores, is the local judicial district s definition of low risk applicable? Yes. Local judicial district rules are controlling until statewide cutoffs are adopted by the Sentencing Commission. 12) Should a Presentence Investigation Report writer mark the postrelease supervision box on the PSI for a SB 123 case? Yes. Offenders whose crime of conviction was committed on or after July 1, 2013 will serve a period of postrelease after revocation or prison sanction and completion of the underlying sentence from SB 123 treatment. But keep in mind that this provision is prospective as postrelease does not apply to SB 123 revocation cases when the crime of conviction was committed prior to July 1, See K.S.A Supp (n)(2), page 5 of HB 2170; and K.S.A Supp (f), page 14 of HB Similarly, offenders who successfully complete the SB 123 program will not serve a period of postrelease supervision. See K.S.A Supp
5 13) Will KDOC need the usual commitment packet from the Court for the 120-day and 180-day sanctions? If so, will time served in jail while waiting for the packet to be completed and received by KDOC count towards the sanction? Yes, the KDOC will need the commitment packet. Representatives from KDOC have indicated that time spent in the local jail awaiting transport will count towards the length of the prison sanction. 14) When imposing a quick dip, how does the concurrence of the Chief Court Services Officer or Community Corrections Director need to take place? Before a CSO or CCO may impose a quick dip sanction, they must have the authorization of the Chief CSO or Community Corrections Director. As of now it is up to each judicial district to develop their own workable system. Written authority in some form would most likely be a preferred method for documentation purposes. See K.S.A Supp (s) and (t) on page 7 of HB ) Will a hearing be required to impose a 120-day or 180-day prison sanction or probation revocation? Yes, a hearing will be required. See page 11 of HB The only violation sanction that does not require a hearing is the quick dip sanction imposed by the CSO or CCO when the probationer waives the right to a hearing. 16) Does the 18 day cap for the quick dip count against the 60 days that the court can impose under current law? No. Felony probation sentences and subsequent revocations can include 60 days jail time pursuant to K.S.A Supp (a)(3) as a condition of the probation. See page 1 of HB This provision is imposed as a sentencing provision. The graduated sanctions available in K.S.A Supp (c) are imposed not for sentencing but for violations of probation and therefore should be considered separate for purposes of this question. See page 11 of HB ) Are interstate compact cases being supervised in another state eligible for the jail and prison sanctions? Technically, yes. But this scenario would seem to only apply if the offender was sent back to Kansas. Otherwise, an offender in another state is treated under the laws of the host state. The district court could assign the offender to a violation sanction in KDOC if the offender is returned to Kansas supervision. This is due to the concern that after serving a violation sanction in Kansas, the Interstate Compact may not allow the return of the offender to the other supervising state for continued supervision. 5
[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. 351. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11
Session of 00 [As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure;
SENATE BILL No. 123 page 2
SENATE BILL No. 123 AN ACT concerning crimes and punishment; relating to possession of drugs; mandatory treatment; amending K.S.A. 65-4160 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4603d, 21-4705, 21-4714, 22-3716 and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 100,851. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, HEATHER HOPKINS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 100,851 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. HEATHER HOPKINS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When interpreting a statute, the fundamental rule to which all
PROBATION LENGTH AND CONDITIONS IN KANSAS
[email protected] 68-West Statehouse, 300 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, Kansas 66612-1504 (785) 296-3181 FAX (785) 296-3824 http://www.kslegislature.org/klrd January 27, 2015 To: From: Re: House Committee on
AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
CHAPTER 15. AN ACT concerning rehabilitation of drug and alcohol dependent offenders and amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:35-15.
CHAPTER 15 AN ACT concerning rehabilitation of drug and alcohol dependent offenders and amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:35-15. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 2015 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 0 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 0 BY JUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE 0 0 0 0 AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent
N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 and 39:4-50.4a August 9, 2004
39:4-50 Driving while intoxicated N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 and 39:4-50.4a August 9, 2004 1 st BAC 0.08% or higher, but less than.10% - $250 to $400 fine, and - IDRC 12 to 48 hours, and - in court s discretion,
Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment
Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment AB 109 (Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011) as subsequently amended by AB 117 (Chapter 39, Statutes of 2011) and ABX1 17 (Chapter 12, Statutes
Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009
Criminal Justice 101 The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness April 2009 Acronyms DOC = Department of Corrections DYC = Division of Youth Corrections DCJ
No. 147. An act relating to referral to court diversion for driving with a suspended license. (S.244)
No. 147. An act relating to referral to court diversion for driving with a suspended license. (S.244) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: Sec. 1. LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE (a)
CHAPTER 93. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:35-14 is amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 93 AN ACT concerning medication-assisted treatment for certain persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS
Title 34-A: CORRECTIONS Chapter 5: PROBATION AND PAROLE Table of Contents Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 3 Section 5001. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 5002. PARDONS BY THE GOVERNOR... 4 Section 5003. PROHIBITED
COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY
COMMUNITY SAFETY VICTIM RESPECT OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY OUR MISSION The mission of the New Hampshire Department of Corrections is to provide a safe, secure, and humane correctional system through effective
2010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS. Effective July 29, 2010
010 CRIMINAL CODE SENTENCING PROVISIONS Effective July 9, 010-0- GENERAL CRIMES SENTENCING RANGES Class NON-DANGEROUS OFFENSES ( 13-70) First Offense ( 13-70(D)) MIT* MIN P MAX AGG* 3 4 5 10 1.5 3.5 3.5
2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/11rs/hb463.
2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/11rs/hb463.htm SECTION 1. -description of reasoning behind legislation SECTION
I. FIRST DUI OFFENSE VEHICLE CODE 23152
I. FIRST DUI OFFENSE VEHICLE CODE 23152 VC 23536 WITHOUT PROBATION Jail: CAVEAT: 96 hours to 6 months (48 hours are continuous unless it interferes with work) None required; however, DMV will not reinstate
ARIZONA ADULT PROBATION
ARIZONA ADULT PROBATION Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report Arizona Supreme Court Adult Probation Services Division ARIZONA SUPREME COURT Administrative Office of the Courts This Report Published By ADULT PROBATION
ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE
The National Hardcore Drunk Driver Project ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE KEY HARDCORE DRUNK DRIVING LEGISLATION: Administrative License Revocation Yes High BAC Law (0.15 BAC or greater) Yes Enhanced Penalties
CHAPTER 23. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 23 AN ACT concerning treatment for drug and alcohol dependent persons, amending N.J.S.2C:35-14 and N.J.S.2C:44-6, and supplementing Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate
The High Cost of DWI. Ignition interlock license available 66-5-503 7
The High Cost of DWI In New Mexico 2007-2008 The New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Bureau Offense Jail 1 Fines and Fees 2 License Revocation 1 st 90 days 48 hours if offender fails
Practioner Guide to HB 585. Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force
Practioner Guide to HB 585 Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force 0 An Introduction to House Bill 585 Seeking to repair the long-standing disconnect between the corrections and criminal
AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.
AB 109 is DANGEROUS Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011. Governor Brown stated in his signing message on AB 109 - "For too long, the state s prison
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Case 1:12-cr-00184-CG Document 12 Filed 10/29/12 Page 1 of 5 AO 245D (Rev. 12/03) Judgment in a Criminal Case for Revocations (11590) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 789 By: Wilkerson COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE [ corrections - judicial review - modifying when report is provided
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1 CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7] 205 11.1(906) Voluntary termination of parole. Any voluntary termination of parole should
Adult Probation Frequently Asked Questions
Adult Probation Frequently Asked Questions How do I make an appointment with my probation officer? To make an appointment with your probation officer, you should give him/her a call. If you do not have
OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES
FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OWI SENTENCING GUIDELINES Citation Issued On or After: July 2, 2013 District Court Administrator 215 S. Hamilton Street, Room 6111 Madison WI 53703-3295 (608) 267-8820 James P.
Practi ti oner Guide to HB 585. Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force
Practi ti oner Guide to HB 585 Mississippi Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force 00 r 10 4116 It43 Seeking to repair the longstanding disconnect between the corrections and criminal justice systems
Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 26. Judgment; presentence report; sentence hearing; sentence.
Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 26. Judgment; presentence report; sentence hearing; sentence. Rule 26.11. Fines and restitution. (a) IMPOSITION OF RESTITUTION. Restitution should be ordered in
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE André de Gruy Capital Defender Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force Created - HB 1231 2013 Leg. Judge and Prosecutor concerns about lack of certainty in sentencing/time-served
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Parole Board 220 IAC 1.1-1-1 Parole board membership (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Parole Board; filed Jun 15, 1987, 2:45 pm: 10 IR 2496) 220 IAC 1.1-1-2 Definitions
(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
CHAPTER 73 HOUSE BILL 2294 AN ACT
House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS -.0, -0.0, - AND -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING
Criminal Justice Realignment Frequently Asked Questions 1 (Revised April 2014)
Criminal Justice Realignment Frequently Asked Questions 1 (Revised April 2014) This document provides responses to some the most frequently asked questions (FAQs) relating to criminal justice realignment.
Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 364.02 Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION 364.01 POLICY. 364.02 DEFINITIONS. 364.021 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT; CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL
No. 102,751 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, KRISTINA I. BISHOP, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 102,751 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KRISTINA I. BISHOP, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. the State. A criminal diversion agreement is essentially
Case 1:06-cr-00201-AWI Document 91 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 1:06-cr-00201-AWI Document 91 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 5 Prob 12B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OF SUPERVISION WITH CONSENT OF THE OFFENDER (Probation Form 49, Waiver
CHAPTER FIVE: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT
CHAPTER FIVE: CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT By Gino L. Divito, Retired Justice, Illinois Appellate Court, Partner, Quinlan & Crisham, Ltd.; Chicago Introduction In Illinois, criminal offenses are defined by the
SECOND CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 35
SESSION OF 2007 SECOND CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 35 Brief* As Agreed to April 25, 2007 House Sub. for SB 35 would:! Clarify when a violation for speeding would
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT? PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Revises the definition of a felony
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box 22024 Santa Ana, CA 92702-2024 (877) 872-2122 www.occourts.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON Forms and Penal Code 4852.01, and 4852.06 Instruction Sheet Notice of Filing of Proof of Service Certificate of Rehabilitation
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs [email protected] (916) 445-4950 WHAT IS
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH RETURN FROM SUPERIOR COURT- STATE PRISON SENTENCE:-:-- -
.1:1 U.!IU Carroll Superior Court 96 Water Village Rd., Box 3 Ossipee NH 03864 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH ("i\1 \\li)(- c- so0 ~s Telephone: (603} 539-2201 TTYffDD Relay: (800) 735-2964
64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE
64th Legislature HB0088 AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE OFFENDER TO PROVIDE E-MAIL ADDRESSES AND SOCIAL MEDIA SCREEN NAMES WHEN REGISTERING; REQUIRING
2015 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. Utah Sentencing Commission Jennifer Valencia, Director [email protected] Office (801) 538-1645 Cell (801) 648-0124
2015 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Utah Sentencing Commission Jennifer Valencia, Director [email protected] Office (801) 538-1645 Cell (801) 648-0124 www.sentencing.utah.gov Legislation tab Sentencing Commission
Filing Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record
Filing Fee $117.00 Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Effective 1-1-2015 This packet is to be used to assist you in filing an application to seal your criminal record. * * * * * * * * * * * * *
First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-01.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL 1- Waller, HOUSE SPONSORSHIP (None), SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees Judiciary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. v. Plaintiff-Appellant, JAMES W. FRENCH, a/k/a JAMES WILLIAMS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2015
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 3, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUNE CURTIS LOUDERMILK Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-00078 W.
District of Columbia Truth-in-Sentencing Commission 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, AC. 20530
District of Columbia Truth-in-Sentencing Commission 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, AC. 20530 The Honorable Linda Cropp The District of Columbia Council 441 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington,
Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated
Policy Options: Limiting Employer Liability When Hiring Individuals Formerly Incarcerated Employers in Philadelphia require skilled and dedicated workers in order to be successful. Returning citizens (those
No. 106,703 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CHRISTIAN REESE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 106,703 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CHRISTIAN REESE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. It is a fundamental rule of criminal procedure in Kansas that
North Carolina Criminal Justice Performance Measures
North Carolina Criminal Justice Performance Measures November 17, 214 Prison Population North Carolina Prison Population: 1997 214 45, 4, 35, 31,581 4,824 41,3 37,665 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 1997-2 Growth:
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055
SESSION OF 2015 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2055 As Agreed to May 18, 2015 Brief* HB 2055 would amend law related to battery against a law enforcement officer, determination of criminal
PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007
December 18, 2007 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Krystal Paris Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Brown: Pursuant
Illinois Family Violence Coordinating Councils
Illinois Family Violence Coordinating Councils Domestic Violence Court System Self-Assessment July 2006 The purpose of the self-assessment is to empower local domestic violence court systems by providing
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP
Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. -0.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL - Kagan, Lee HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Guzman, Ulibarri SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone (517) 373-0130
Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone (517) 373-0130 Carl L. Gromek, Chief of Staff State Court Administrator Memorandum
Community Supervision in Texas
Brad Livingston, Executive Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Carey Welebob, Director TDCJ - Community Justice Assistance Division (TDCJ-CJAD) Community Supervision in Texas Presentation to
New Jersey Rehabilitated Convicted Offenders Act
New Jersey Rehabilitated Convicted Offenders Act 2A:168A-1. Legislative findings The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to assist the rehabilitation of convicted offenders
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as State v. Purtilo, 2015-Ohio-2985.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2015-L-003 ROBERT
PENALTIES AND FINES FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES IN NEW YORK STATE
PENALTIES AND FINES FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES IN NEW YORK STATE Offense Mandatory Fine Maximum Jail Term Mandatory Action Against Your License DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR WHILE ABILITY
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA 98109 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 605 Thomas Street Seattle, WA 98109 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 I. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS FOR DUI [RCW 46.61.502] OR PHYSICAL CONTROL [RCW 46.61.504]
ALABAMA s FELONY DUI STATUTE- A HISTORY. [This document was originally prepared by AOC and was later revised and updated by Patrick Mahaney.
ALABAMA s FELONY DUI STATUTE- A HISTORY [This document was originally prepared by AOC and was later revised and updated by Patrick Mahaney.] Felony DUI, as a statutory offense under the Alabama Code, was
The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations
The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations Criminal Justice Policy Council Prepared for the 77 th Texas Legislature, 2001 Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive Director The Substance
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THOMAS VIERECK Appellant No. 656 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment
Colorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 MEMORANDUM October 9, 2012 TO: Interested Persons FROM: Hillary Smith, Research
2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
SB138 Engrossed LRB9203748RCcd 1 AN ACT concerning drug treatment. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may
DETENTION HEARINGS By Michael C. O Brien Assistant District Attorney 305 th District Court, Dallas, Texas
DETENTION HEARINGS By Michael C. O Brien Assistant District Attorney 305 th District Court, Dallas, Texas Speaker Biography Michael C. O Brien is a prosecutor with Dallas County District Attorney s Office
SORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Tennessee
September 2011 SORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Tennessee The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering,
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst:
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE and LOCAL FISCAL IMPACT Drafting Number: Prime Sponsor(s): LLS 15-0042 Rep. Saine; McCann Sen. Cooke; Johnston Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: House
KANSAS SENTENCING COMMISSION
KANSAS SENTENCING GUIDELINES DESK REFERENCE MANUAL 2013 KANSAS SENTENCING COMMISSION STAFF SCOTT SCHULTZ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KUNLUN CHANG DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH BRENDA HARMON SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE EXECUTIVE
Criminal Justice in Nevada Part I: Overview
Criminal Justice in Nevada Part I: Overview 2010-2011 Policy and Program Report Produced by the Publications Unit, February 2010 OVERVIEW OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM In the United States, generally
LEGAL INFORMATION ON PUNISHMENTS, FINES, FEES, ETC., FOR ALL DUI AND AGG. DUI CONVICTIONS
LEGAL INFORMATION ON PUNISHMENTS, FINES, FEES, ETC., FOR ALL DUI AND AGG. DUI CONVICTIONS Note: ALL types of DUI related surcharges cannot be waived - 28-1390. Fines & Fees are listed in the respective
JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS
JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Sex Offender Laws... 1 Jacob Wetterling Act of 1994... 2 Megan s Law (1996)... 2 Pam Lychner Act of 1996... 2 Adam Walsh Act of 2006...
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 4.16 CRIMINAL ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 4.16 CRIMINAL ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM In order to provide for successful completion of community supervision and reduce victimization
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
Second Regular Session Sixty-eighth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED
Second Regular Session Sixty-eighth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. -0.01 Michael Dohr x SENATE BILL -1 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Mitchell and Steadman, Aguilar, Cadman, Grantham, Guzman,
SOBRIETY PROGRAM GUIDELINES Office of Attorney General
SOBRIETY PROGRAM GUIDELINES Office of Attorney General 2013 Contents I. GENERAL PROVISIONS...3 A. Policy Statement...3 B. Definitions....4 C. Testing Site...6 D. 24/7 Sobriety Testing as a Condition of
CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2154
SESSION OF 2015 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2154 As Agreed to May 11, 2015 Brief* HB 2154 would establish a permissive veterans preference in private employment; establish employment
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 2000 112 TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
THE BIANCHI LAW FIRM 2000 112 TH AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 WASHINGTON DRINKING & DRIVING PENALTIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 I. CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS FOR DUI [RCW 46.61.502] OR PHYSICAL CONTROL [RCW 46.61.504]
TOP 20 GENERAL RULES. Automatic Driver's License Suspension Provisions Page 1 AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
TOP 20 GENERAL RULES AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. WHAT ARE THE TYPES OF SUSPENSIONS? (Driver s License Suspension Guide) a. Automatic Suspensions on conviction: i. 21 years of age or older. TEX. TRANSP.
Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 813 2013 EDITION Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants GENERAL PROVISIONS 813.010 Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty 813.011 Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants;
OF MULTIPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES INVOLVING ALCOHOL OR DRUGS, AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION THEREFOR.
NOTE: This bill has been prepared for the signature of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor. To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-00.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL 1- HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Saine and McCann, Cooke and Johnston, SENATE SPONSORSHIP
