Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice



Similar documents
to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

CASE 0:05-cv JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

2:09-cv LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Memorandum and Order

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

NUMBER CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 4:13-cv Document 40 Filed in TXSD on 02/26/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

How To Get Money Back From A Fall And Fall Case

What to Expect When You re Expecting A Lawsuit

MEMORANDUM OPINION. No CV. AML MOTORS, INC., Appellant. Da mon THOMAS, Appellee

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv LY Document 38 Filed 02/21/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

2016 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit

CIVIL APPEALS PAMPHLET PRO BONO PROJECT FOR THE SPONSORED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE PRO BONO COMMITTEES FOR THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS APPELLATE SECTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ORDER

Case 6:66-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:14-cv TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO CV. D. B., Appellant. K. B., Appellee. On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv WMN Document 29 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

Case 2:12-cv SSV-JCW Document 283 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION. EARL A. POWELL, In the name of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Case 4:06-cv Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients

Case 2:08-cv EFM Document 44 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.

Case 1:05-cv RAE Doc #47 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#<pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv MVL-DEK Document 33 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 4:04-cv Document 43 Filed in TXSD on 04/04/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

Case 0:12-cv JIC Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/13 12:33:23 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:14-cv JIC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

State Bar of Texas Advanced Personal Injury Law Course

S14G1862. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. v. WEDEREIT. Brian Wedereit sued BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. f/k/a Countrywide

How To Defend Yourself In A Court Case Against A Trust

Eleventh Court of Appeals

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Case 2:04-cv SRD-ALC Document 29 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO:

TITLE XXIII CLAIMS FOR LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS

19: Who may file

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Kauffman, J. April 18, 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010

Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT. No (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. GREEN, S.J. September, 1999

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Sample. Session 4: Case Analysis & Planning. Identify potential legal and non-legal options for achieving client goals

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

Case 3:10-cv BH Document 38 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID 250

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2011 Session

How To Get A Summary Judgment In A Well Service Case In Texas

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES

Case 1:07-cv MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TITLE I REDUCTION OF ABUSIVE LITIGATION

Case 4:14-cv Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER

2:08-cv DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Case Nos and CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. Appellant No.

, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 24, 2010 Session

Case 3:13-cv Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ORDER

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Transcription:

Dos and Don ts of Summary Judgment Practice DBA Presents 13 Building Blocks Title Here for Becoming a Great Trial Lawyer

Why on earth?! But I m a trial lawyer! Why in the world would I need to know anything about disposition without trial?!

Disclaimer WARNING: This 30-minute presentation contains *highlights* only.

Do Take Inventory What are the legal issues? Are the facts in dispute? Are the disputed facts material, based on the legal issues? Does the plaintiff have the evidence to prove its case?

To MSJ or not to MSJ? Your case Do questions of law predominate? Do the parties disagree on a legal issue for which there is no clear answer? Does your opponent or her client completely misunderstand the law and needs a little friendly guidance from the court? Are so-called disputed facts immaterial based on applicable law? Does the opposing party does have insufficient evidence to support its claim? Do the parties have a genuine dispute regarding material facts? MSJ? X

Don t Panic!

Don t Forget the Purpose The summary-judgment procedure is designed to facilitate the prompt disposition of cases that involve unmeritorious claims or defenses.

Do Understand the Rules Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a

Do Understand the Rules Several options Traditional MSJ movant presents summary-judgment evidence No-evidence MSJ movant does not present any evidence, forces respondent to present evidence sufficient to raise a fact issue Hybrid presents grounds for both a traditional MSJ and a no-evidence MSJ NOTE: Make sure the motion clearly specifies the grounds on which summary judgment is sought.

Don t Overlook Burdens of Proof Movant has initial burden to demonstrate court should enter summary judgment Must prove all elements of movant s affirmative claim or defense or disprove at least one element of non-movant s claim or defense If movant meets this burden, non-movant has burden to present evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact Non-movant is not required to prove its case or marshal all of its proof

Do Remember the Rubric In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must Assume the non-movant s proof is true Make every reasonable inference in favor of the non-movant Resolve doubts about the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the movant If the MSJ is based on the pleadings, ensure that any defects cannot be cured by amendment

Don t Miss the Deadlines Under Texas rules The non-movant is entitled to at least 21 days notice of the hearing or submission* date (Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c)) The non-movant may then file a response no later than 7 days before the hearing or submission date (Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c)) Any reply must comply with local court rules

Don t Miss the Deadlines Under the federal rules Unless the local rule or court sets a different deadline, a movant may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery (Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(b)) Check local rules for response and reply deadlines (in fact, always check local, and local local rules) Typically, federal courts consider summary judgment motions on submission, unless the court grants a party s request for hearing

The Motion Preliminary Statement Use this as an introduction to your motion The preliminary statement should be crafted purposefully to convey your most persuasive and important points concisely At this point, you have the court s attention do not lose it!

The Motion Grounds for Summary Judgment Must be clearly stated we use a separate section, clearly labeled Grounds for Summary Judgment The grounds should not be argumentative, but should be stated persuasively, so the court understands why your client is entitled to summary judgment If the MSJ will resolve all claims asserted in the case, make that clear. If you are seeking partial summary judgment, make that clear.

The Motion Summary Judgment Facts Summary judgment will not be granted if facts are in dispute; we call this section Undisputed Facts Persuasively stated, but not argumentative Make sure you have evidence to support each fact and cite the evidence Argument + Authorities Should be persuasively stated and carefully organized

The Response Do present evidence demonstrating genuine issues of material fact Do ensure that responsive evidence is in admissible form and properly authenticated Do object to any defect in the form or substance of the movant s motion, pleadings or evidence Summary judgment grounds must be supported by the movant s pleadings failure to object waives error Must object to movant s summary judgment evidence that is not admissible or properly authenticated

The Response If permitted, consider filing an amended pleading to avoid summary judgment Add new claims or issues, if supported by the evidence Omit factual admissions that have been used to set up the motion for summary judgment

Don t Overlook Timing Factors Would early resolution of one or more legal issues facilitate a settlement? Do the parties agree that certain legal issues could be resolved before conducting expensive discovery? Are there core issues involving questions of law? Employment ERISA Insurance Declaratory judgment actions

Do Consider Settlement Impact Do the parties have a fundamental disagreement about a legal issue that could be resolved by summary judgment? Would a ruling on a particular legal issue impact the parties perspective regarding settlement value? For example, if the court decides an insurer defendant has a duty to provide a defense (which is a question of law), the parties may be better positioned to settle issues relating to indemnity and damages.

Questions?

Thanks! Amy Elizabeth Stewart amy@amystewartlaw.com AMY STEWART PC Mockingbird Station 5307 E. Mockingbird Lane, Suite 425 Dallas, Texas 75206 214 233 7076 main 214 347 9394 direct