Are You MADD? Chandreyee Johnson BSHS/355. February 2, 2015. Aaron Short



Similar documents
Blunt Truth Conference. Debbie Weir MADD CEO

Conference Summary Report

Drunk Driving: The Teen Killer. from being stationed in Iraq for two years. When the time comes for him to arrive home, instead

House Bill 128, Amendments to

dad had 0.26 alcohol level Police: Blood test revealed Fifth DUI Results in Injuries to Children drunken-driving convictions

Drinking and Driving

Evaluating the Effectiveness Of California s Ignition Interlock Program

BACKGROUND. National. Cell Phone Use and Text Messaging

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs

Founding MADD. Cari Lightner

An Analysis of Idaho s Kootenai County DUI Court

Candidate Questionnaire

Program Descriptions:

Annual Report On Drunk Driving In Springdale, Arkansas For the year 2012

DON T DO IT. How Impaired Driving Can Wreck Your Life FOTOLIA

CANADIAN ROAD SAFETY YOUTH CONFERENCE ENFORCEMENT. Police Constable Mike Taylor # 8855 Toronto Police Service

The High Cost of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in New Hampshire. Executive Summary. PolEcon Research December 2012

Source: Minnesota Student Survey, Key Trends Through 2007, Minnesota Departments of Corrections, Education, Health, Human Services and Public Safety.

911: Lifeline Legislation

Code of Conduct for Commercial Drivers

THE ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2013 DRINKING AND DRIVING IN CANADA

Intoxicated Driver Laws

Michigan Driving Record Alcohol, Drugs and Consequences

LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT David J. Main, Chief of Police

ALCOHOL A DEADLY MIX AND FACTS ABOUT BOATING. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY Department of Boating and Waterways. Gray Davis Governor

DUI Voir Dire Questions INTRODUCTION

DUI Penalties: The Effectiveness of Pennsylvania s Drinking and Driving Laws. Keri Ritter CJCR 300. In 2003, a study surveyed 6,002 United

DWI Conviction Penalties. Penalty Overview

Family of Young Nursing Student Looks For Accountability in Hopes of Preventing Another Needless Death.

MOTORING offences & criminal law

Texas Underage Drinking Laws. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Education and Prevention Department P.O. Box Austin, Texas 78711

Running head: TIME FOR A CHANGE 1. Time for a Change: Legalizing Marijuana in the State of Texas. Ronald Cummings.

How are you getting home? Drinking, Driving and the Law THE-TABC

MORE OPTIONS. SHIFTING MINDSETS. DRIVING BETTER CHOICES.

Binge Drinking on College Campuses: A Road Map to Successful Prevention. Preventing binge drinking on college campuses: A guide to best practices

Annual Report On Drunk Driving In Springdale, Arkansas For the Year

You And The Drinking Driving Laws

Not in Our House. Alcohol & Your Child. Facts about Underage Drinking Every Parent Should Know

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON TRANSPORT. Measures to Combat Drink Driving and the Use of Hand-held Mobile Phone While Driving

DUI STOP WHAT TO EXPECT

Opponents to Marijuana Legalization

Impaired and Distracted Drivers: A continuing dilemma. Sgt. Thomas Neve Ofc. Alan Haywood

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO VICTIMS OF CRIME DIVISION. IN RE: JEANENE S. LITTLER : Case No. V

No Eastern International student shall coerce, even subtly, another Eastern International student to use drugs or alcohol.

Safe Transportation System. Tangible Result Driver Leanna Depue, Highway Safety Director

Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse MCOSA. Executive Summary

FFY 2016 PROPOSAL. Contact Information. Surprise Police Department ADDRESS W. Statler Plaza, #103

REVISION: This revised directive supersedes TSA MD , Addressing DUI and DWI Offenses, dated November 22, 2006.

XARELTO: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IT

Impaired Motorcycle Riding: Law Enforcement Officers Focus Group Results. Joey W. Syner and Maria E. Vegega

CHILD ABUSE REPORTING PROCEDURES

Whitlam s Law. Campaign to make drink driving laws apply to vehicles driven on private land

PROGRAM NARRATIVE Page 8

Utica College Annual Notice Regarding Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Policies

COLLEGE POLICY STATEMENT ON DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FOR FACULTY AND STAFF

CONGRATULATIONS! YOU HAVE YOUR G1

Texas Highway Safety Operations Center: Using Data to Combat Crime, Crash, and Traffic Enforcement Issues

In the Supreme Court of the United States

DRIVING CONTRACT FOR NEW DRIVERS AND THEIR PARENTS A Message to Teenagers and Their Parents Concerning Safe Driving in Maine

Policy Summary. Dram Shop Liability

Prescription Drug Abuse

25 February 2005 Our ref Jane Sanders Mobile Doc no Sydney\

Austin Independent School District Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual

Road safety a work-environment issue

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Bill Quirk, Chair. AB 8 (Gatto) As Introduced December 1, 2014

Driving under the Influence of Alcohol in Israel and the Middle East

Table of Contents. Selected Iowa Wrongful Death Laws and Rules

are the leading cause of teen fatalities, accounting for

Avoid the 12 Stanislaus County DUI Taskforce PRESS RELEASE

Underage Drinking and Driving Laws Laws

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances;

ATOD Conference - April 3, 2014

The Corrosive Effects of Alcohol and Drug Misuse on NH s Workforce and Economy SUMMARY REPORT. Prepared by:

To: Commission From: Christopher Cavaiola and Laura C. Tharney Re: Title 39 Driving while intoxicated Date: July 11, 2011 M E M O R A N D U M

Transcription:

1 Are You MADD? Chandreyee Johnson BSHS/355 February 2, 2015 Aaron Short

2 Are you MADD? Mothers Against Drunk Driving, also known as MADD, has been a powerful non-profit organization paving the way to change in the United States through advocating and educating against drunk driving. Established in 1979, the aim of MADD was to raise awareness and help prevent drunk driving and the loss associated with it. More than 35 years later, MADD continues to progress and exert social influence in their fight to combat drunk driving. Through education of drunk driving and penalization where needed, MADD as well as individual society members can stand up and help save lives through creating awareness and acting against drunk driving. Why MADD? MADD was established in 1979 by Beckie Brown, who after experiencing the loss of her18 year old son due to a drunk driving accident, decided to take a stand against the harmful and potentially fatal behaviors of drunk driving. Brown s mission through the establishment of MADD was and continues to be to advocate as a voice of logic in order to educate against drunk driving with the hope of reducing drunk driving related accidents and deaths. Through her tireless representation, she managed to influence law and arouse social support and interest. The Social Dilemma Drunk driving in the late 60s was a concept unrevealed. Accidents involving alcohol were not thought of as caused by alcohol; but rather as operator error and mere coincidence of the two incidents having taken place together (Loewit-Phillips & Goldbas, 2013). The outcry of Brown in 1979 as a result of her lost son awakened a numb society to the real issues and dangers lurking behind drunk driving. She helped to identify the high numbers of death and accidents involved in drunk driving, and helped make the information more available to the public. Through this

3 social realization, she was able to bring attention to the matter to not only the public, but to local, state, and federal law as well. Through the efforts of MADD, awareness was increased dramatically and legislative action was taken to help prevent drunk driving. In the late 90s and early 2000s, a red MADD ribbon could be found on countless vehicles across the nation by individuals in support of the beliefs surrounding MADD s organization. While lesser support can be visibly seen in recent times, the outcry of the public still remains as prosecution of drunken driving remains a high priority. MADD Social Policies The organization of MADD has helped identify the major problems associated with drunk and drugged driving within the United States. Through pervasive effort, Mothers Against Drunk Driving has influenced social change and legislative action, as well as influencing individuals within society. Perhaps the biggest credit that can be gifted to MADD s organizational influence on social policies is the implementation of the legal drinking age law. In 1984, the Federal 21 Minimum Drinking Age Act was signed into effect as a result of countless amounts of effort from public, legislative, and MADD efforts. As time has progressed since implementation, several regulations have been put in place to help keep the law enforced. Countless public service announcements, televised ads, radio ads, and imagery have infiltrated public eyes, thereby keeping the seriousness of the issue a present thought of the public. Policies continue to develop in reaction to the seriousness of underage drinking, alcoholism, and other such related

4 issues that encompass alcohol. Through these efforts, policies are rigorously generated in order to keep up with the ever changing shift in citizen behavior. The Federal 21 Minimum Drinking Age Act certainly cannot be overshadowed by the reduction in drunken driving related deaths and injuries, nor can it overshadow the amount of public awareness that has been created. It is in part through the tireless efforts of MADD that so much has been able to be accomplished in the movement towards a more sober driving state of public mind. Today, MADD continues to influence individual social action through pledges of sober driving, fundraising, and providing assistance to victims and families of drunk driving. Problems of Implementation Some social unrest spurred as a result of the implementation of the law requiring individuals to be at least 21 to drink. With this unrest came the hesitance to enforce the legal drinking age of 21. A common argument heard to date is that if an individual is old enough to die for their country, they should be able to drink. The continued unrest associated with punishing drunk driving as a crime can be countered with the concept presented by Koshland (1989), who compares the hardness of law to statistical mortality, or in other words, the harm that is created on some now will serve as a betterment for all in the future. In order to help enforce the new law of age restricted drinking, the threat of loss of government funds for highway construction was introduced. This introduction of state penalization resulted in stricter adherence from each state in relation to the minimum age law. Regardless of each state s reasoning for enforcement, it has finally been nationally well-received that driving under excess of each state s blood alcohol legal limit is a crime punishable by law.

5 Effects on Human Services The age requirement on alcohol consumption has posed its own challenges to human service delivery. With drunk driving being a heavily penalized crime, there are advantages and disadvantages for agencies. As a result of a higher crack down on drinking and driving, more people are being referred into agencies to help them overcome alcohol consumption problems; but by the same token, agencies who are experiencing a rising need to focus on alcohol treatment are faced with further funding deficits to provide the best possible services. It would seem that more focus is still need to provide policies for agencies who service this population of growing need. If You Aren t, Be MADD Mothers Against Drunk Driving has been a powerful influence in the battle against drunk and drugged driving. Through their commitment to educate the public and provide services to those impacted, MADD has exerted a needed presence in the fight against intoxicated driving. With organizations such as MADD and human service agencies fighting to do their part in combating alcoholism and intoxicated driving, the only question remains is this: are you MADD yet?

6 References Koshland, D. E. (1989, May). Drunk Driving and Statistical Mortality. Science, 244(4904), 513. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/docview/21354663 4?accountid=458 Loewit-Phillips, P. M., & Goldbas, A. (2013, October). Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): History and Impact. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 28(4), 62-67. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/docview/14450088 14?accountid=458