The Relationship Between Rodent Offspring Blood Lead Levels and Maternal Diet



Similar documents
This can dilute the significance of a departure from the null hypothesis. We can focus the test on departures of a particular form.

SAS Syntax and Output for Data Manipulation:

Using An Ordered Logistic Regression Model with SAS Vartanian: SW 541

Outline. Topic 4 - Analysis of Variance Approach to Regression. Partitioning Sums of Squares. Total Sum of Squares. Partitioning sums of squares

Individual Growth Analysis Using PROC MIXED Maribeth Johnson, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA

Random effects and nested models with SAS

Math 151. Rumbos Spring Solutions to Assignment #22

Data Mining and Data Warehousing. Henryk Maciejewski. Data Mining Predictive modelling: regression

Final Exam Practice Problem Answers

Introduction to Longitudinal Data Analysis

UNTIED WORST-RANK SCORE ANALYSIS

Two-sample hypothesis testing, II /16/2004

Family economics data: total family income, expenditures, debt status for 50 families in two cohorts (A and B), annual records from

VI. Introduction to Logistic Regression

1.1. Simple Regression in Excel (Excel 2010).

Module 5: Introduction to Multilevel Modelling SPSS Practicals Chris Charlton 1 Centre for Multilevel Modelling

Statistics and Pharmacokinetics in Clinical Pharmacology Studies

An Introduction to Statistics Course (ECOE 1302) Spring Semester 2011 Chapter 10- TWO-SAMPLE TESTS

ln(p/(1-p)) = α +β*age35plus, where p is the probability or odds of drinking

A LOGNORMAL MODEL FOR INSURANCE CLAIMS DATA

>

Elementary Statistics Sample Exam #3

Consider a study in which. How many subjects? The importance of sample size calculations. An insignificant effect: two possibilities.

Qualitative vs Quantitative research & Multilevel methods

Math 108 Exam 3 Solutions Spring 00

Topic 9. Factorial Experiments [ST&D Chapter 15]

16. THE NORMAL APPROXIMATION TO THE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION

Solution Let us regress percentage of games versus total payroll.

Experimental Design for Influential Factors of Rates on Massive Open Online Courses

Milk Data Analysis. 1. Objective Introduction to SAS PROC MIXED Analyzing protein milk data using STATA Refit protein milk data using PROC MIXED

HYPOTHESIS TESTING (ONE SAMPLE) - CHAPTER 7 1. used confidence intervals to answer questions such as...

Analysis of Correlated Data. Patrick J. Heagerty PhD Department of Biostatistics University of Washington

Simple Linear Regression Inference

Probability Calculator

HYPOTHESIS TESTING: POWER OF THE TEST

861 Example SPLH. 5 page 1. prefer to have. New data in. SPSS Syntax FILE HANDLE. VARSTOCASESS /MAKE rt. COMPUTE mean=2. COMPUTE sal=2. END IF.

Summary. Keywords: methanol, glycerin, intake, beef cattle. Introduction

HYPOTHESIS TESTING (ONE SAMPLE) - CHAPTER 7 1. used confidence intervals to answer questions such as...

13. Poisson Regression Analysis

Normal Distribution. Definition A continuous random variable has a normal distribution if its probability density. f ( y ) = 1.

ECE302 Spring 2006 HW4 Solutions February 6,

[This document contains corrections to a few typos that were found on the version available through the journal s web page]

E(y i ) = x T i β. yield of the refined product as a percentage of crude specific gravity vapour pressure ASTM 10% point ASTM end point in degrees F

An Introduction to Modeling Longitudinal Data

New SAS Procedures for Analysis of Sample Survey Data

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER MSC IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHODS ANALYSING AND INTERPRETING DATA 2 PART 1 WEEK 9

Laboratory 3 Type I, II Error, Sample Size, Statistical Power

Section 14 Simple Linear Regression: Introduction to Least Squares Regression

Joint Exam 1/P Sample Exam 1

Influence of missing data on analysis and power calculation in bioequivalence studies

Class 19: Two Way Tables, Conditional Distributions, Chi-Square (Text: Sections 2.5; 9.1)

3.4 The Normal Distribution

Getting Correct Results from PROC REG

DATA INTERPRETATION AND STATISTICS

Lecture 19: Conditional Logistic Regression

November 08, S8.6_3 Testing a Claim About a Standard Deviation or Variance

Additional sources Compilation of sources:

Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Means

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

Hypothesis Testing: Two Means, Paired Data, Two Proportions

Poisson Regression or Regression of Counts (& Rates)

1 Basic ANOVA concepts

IAPRI Quantitative Analysis Capacity Building Series. Multiple regression analysis & interpreting results

Lecture 10: Depicting Sampling Distributions of a Sample Proportion

Regression Analysis: A Complete Example

10. Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Repeat-measures analysis

Chapter 5: Normal Probability Distributions - Solutions

Lucky vs. Unlucky Teams in Sports

Unit 26 Estimation with Confidence Intervals

Lesson 1: Comparison of Population Means Part c: Comparison of Two- Means

Barometer of business travel management in China CBTF 2013

Health Insurance by Work Characteristics: 2008

Parametric and non-parametric statistical methods for the life sciences - Session I

Logit Models for Binary Data

Lecture 14 More on Real Business Cycles. Noah Williams

SAS Software to Fit the Generalized Linear Model

Chapter 4. Probability Distributions

An Introduction to Statistical Tests for the SAS Programmer Sara Beck, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Overview of Methods for Analyzing Cluster-Correlated Data. Garrett M. Fitzmaurice

Poisson Models for Count Data

Summary of Formulas and Concepts. Descriptive Statistics (Ch. 1-4)

39.2. The Normal Approximation to the Binomial Distribution. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Repelling effect on mice and rats

39.2. The Normal Approximation to the Binomial Distribution. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Two-Sample T-Tests Allowing Unequal Variance (Enter Difference)

ADVANCED FORECASTING MODELS USING SAS SOFTWARE

Other forms of ANOVA

I L L I N O I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

Probability Distribution for Discrete Random Variables

Statistical Models in R

Chapter 19 Split-Plot Designs

Basic Statistics and Data Analysis for Health Researchers from Foreign Countries

ECE302 Spring 2006 HW5 Solutions February 21,

Long-term Health Spending Persistence among the Privately Insured: Exploring Dynamic Panel Estimation Approaches

Transcription:

The Relationship Between Rodent Offspring Blood Lead Levels and Maternal Diet Allison Crawford, Xiahong Li, Mira Shapiro 1, Ruitao Zhang Introduction A study was undertaken to understand the effect of maternal lead ingestion, from food, on fertility in mice offspring. Twenty-four mothers were given feed at eight lead levels ranging from 0.02 to 40 ppm. Four offspring were chosen, at random, from each of the mothers and their blood lead concentration was measured. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the blood lead concentration levels of the mouse offspring with respect to the maternal lead level ingestion. Material and Methods Data Twenty-four mothers were randomized to receive a rodent diet with a specified level of lead (0.02, 0.06, 0.11, 0.2, 2, 4, 20, or 40 ppm). These exposure levels were classified as follows: 20 ppm and 40 ppm are considered high or relatively high exposure, 2 ppm and 4 ppm are low exposure, 0.2 ppm is the control level, 0.06 ppm and 0.11 ppm are very low exposure, and.02 ppm is considered lead free. In the initial study, 0.2 ppm was specified as the control group given that this is the usual background level of lead in the rodent feed. Since in this analysis the goal is to assess offspring lead level with respect to the lead level in the maternal diet, we will use the lowest level 0.02 ppm as our referent group. Ninety-six offspring, four randomly selected from each mother, constituted the subjects for this study. Model In order to assess the relationship between the lead level of the feed given to the mothers and the blood lead concentration in the offspring, a mixed effects model of the following form was evaluated using SAS 9.1.3. Proc Mixed was used to fit the model, exploiting this procedure s capability to include both fixed and random effects. 1 Primary author

Model: Yijk = µ.. + τi + Sj(i) + εijk where: i: indicates the treatment, lead level in the rodent feed j: indicates the mother k: indicates the individual offspring µ.. : is a constant representing the overall mean blood level in the offspring Yijk : Blood lead level of individual offspring τi : fixed treatment effect, where τi = 0 Sj(i) : Represents the random maternal effect for mother i, independent with N(0, σ 2 ). The error is nested within treatment since the ith treatment was given to more than one of the of j mothers. εijk : Represents the between subjects, is independent with N(0, σ 2 ) Sj(i) and εij are independent. Results The mean level of lead concentration measured in the offspring s blood, for each level of maternal exposure, along with the standard error for the estimate, is shown in Table 1. The mean level of lead concentration in the blood of the offspring increases along with maternal lead exposure at all levels. Table 1: Estimated Means for Each Level of Lead Exposure Standard Effect pblevel Estimate Error pblevel 1.high 10.7750 0.6095 pblevel 2.low 3.6292 0.6095 pblevel 3.control 1.9417 0.8619 pblevel 4.very low 1.4458 0.6095 pblevel 5.lead free 0.6917 0.8619 Evaluating the differences in mean levels of offspring blood lead concentrations between each of the groups results in significant differences at the <.0001 level for High versus all of the other exposure levels. The difference in means

between low and very low, and low and lead free exposure levels resulted in p- values of 0.0203 and 0.0119 respectively. The mean differences were not statistically significant for any of the other group comparisons. These results are displayed in Appendix 2. The mixed model was designed with the lead free group as the referent group. Examining the fixed effects solution (Table 2) reveals that, with respect to a lead free diet, only the low and high lead rodent feed categories result in a statistically significant difference in offspring blood lead concentrations. Table 2: Solution for Main Effects Standard Effect pblevel Estimate Error DF t Value Pr > t Intercept 0.6917 0.8619 19 0.80 0.4322 pblevel 1.high 10.0833 1.0556 19 9.55 <.0001 pblevel 2.low 2.9375 1.0556 19 2.78 0.0119 pblevel 3.control 1.2500 1.2189 19 1.03 0.3180 pblevel 4.very low 0.7542 1.0556 19 0.71 0.4836 pblevel 5.lead free 0 The results of the mixed model include the breakdown of the variance into the between-mother and within-mother components, and are shown in Table 3. In this model, since the mother is nested in lead exposure level, the betweenmother variance component includes the variance associated with the lead level exposure and that associated with the mother. It makes sense that the variation within lead exposure level is a smaller portion of the overall variance than the between component. Table 3: Covariance Parameter Estimates Estimate Mother(pblevel) between 2.1837 Residual within 0.1799 Conclusion It is clear from these results that maternal consumption of lead is associated with offspring blood lead concentration, and not surprisingly the highest concentration causes the most significant effects. An interesting follow-up study might include evaluating the effect of blood lead level concentration on offspring behavior and development.

Appendix 1: SAS Code ***************************************************************************; * Bioepi 743 Spring 2006; * Group Project: Allison Crawford, Xiaohong Li, Mira Shapiro, Ruitao Zhang; * Problem 2.7 * Date: 2/12/06; * Program Source: z:\bioepi74027.sas; * Data Source: ffindings4; ****************************************************************; libname hw27 "z:\"; data mice(keep=pblevel mother bpb pb); length pblevel $ 12; set hw27.ffindings4; * create categorical variable representing lead (Pb) levels; select(pb); when(40) pblevel='1.high'; when(20) pblevel='1.high'; when(2) pblevel='2.low'; when(4) pblevel='2.low'; when(0.06) pblevel='4.very low'; when(0.11) pblevel='4.very low'; when(0.2) pblevel='3.control'; when(0.02) pblevel='5.lead free'; otherwise; end; run; * use proc mixed to assess the effect of Pb ingestion by the mother on; * the offspring; * Nest Pblevel in Mother and make a random effect; * PBlevel is a surrogate for offspring in model; * fixed effect: Pb level; * LSmeans to obtain mean and variance estimates; proc mixed data=mice ; class pblevel Mother; model bpb=pblevel/s ; random Mother(pblevel); lsmeans pblevel/diff; run;

Appendix 2: Mean Differences