Running head: INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 1. Informational Text in the Primary Classroom. A Research Project



Similar documents
CHALLENGES, BENEFITS, AND EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING INFORMATIONAL TEXTS IN THE PRIMARY GRADES: A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

An Early Childhood Practitioner s Guide: Developmentally Appropriate Literacy Practices for Preschool-Age Children

Grade Level: 2 nd Grade

TOP 10 RESOURCES FOR TEACHERS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS. Melissa McGavock Director of Bilingual Education

ESL I English as a Second Language I Curriculum

Reading Strategies by Level. Early Emergent Readers

The Power of Interactive Read Alouds By: Gwen Marra, Ed.D. Today s classrooms are bombarded with demands of all kinds. Teachers work to find balance

(MIRP) Monitoring Independent Reading Practice

Help! My Student Doesn t Speak English. 10 Tips To Help Your English Language Learners Succeed Today

EXPOSITORY TEXT AND ELEMENTARY STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON STANDARDIZED TESTS by Daniel J. Barry

Unit 1 Title: Reading Grade Level: Second (2 nd ) Timeframe: 5 Weeks

The English Language Learner CAN DO Booklet

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 5

How To Write The English Language Learner Can Do Booklet

parent ROADMAP SUPPORTING YOUR CHILD IN GRADE FIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A

Mendham Township School District Reading Curriculum Kindergarten

Reading Timeline 2nd Nine Weeks

Teaching Expository Comprehension Skills in Early Childhood Classrooms

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 6

Helping English Language Learners Understand Content Area Texts

Virginia English Standards of Learning Grade 8

Growing Up With Epilepsy

Teaching Young Children How to Read: Phonics vs. Whole Language. Introduction and Background

27 Before, During, and After Reading Activities with Graphic Organizers to be used with nonfiction passages for students in Grades 2 5!

Teacher's Guide to Meeting the Common Core State Standards* with Scott Foresman Reading Street 2008

How to Improve Reading Comprehension

Weekly Lesson Plan for Shared Reading Kindergarten

Alignment Guide Supplemental Educational Services Featuring ReadAbout

2-3: Narrative Wall Blackline Masters

What Does Research Tell Us About Teaching Reading to English Language Learners?

Reading: Text level guide

ELL Considerations for Common Core-Aligned Tasks in English Language Arts

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Language Arts Curriculum and Assessment Alignment Form Rewards Intermediate Grades 4-6

Exam papers from RE 5100, Beginning Readers and Writers. Assessment Summary Sheet from RE 5715, Reading Assessment and Correction

Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs

From Our Classroom Strategy Library During Reading

A Scho ol Reform Framework for Improving Adolescent Literacy for All Students

Making Reading Content Comprehensible for Intermediate Language Learners. Colin Dalton. University of Houston-Downtown, United States

7 Critical Thinking Skills of Common Core

Inspiration Standards Match: Virginia

Muhammad Ali Presents Go the Distance! Aligns to Title I, Part A. June

3rd Grade Reading Standard Exceeds (4) Secure (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1)

Integrating Reading and Writing for Effective Language Teaching

Penguin Facts. Standards for the 21st-Century Learner. Published on AASL Learning4Life Lesson Plan Database

Grading Benchmarks FIRST GRADE. Trimester st Student has achieved reading success at. Trimester st In above grade-level books, the

GRADE 8 LITERACY: FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY SUPPORTS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Third Grade Language Arts Learning Targets - Common Core

Growing Strong Nonfiction Readers and Writers What Matters Most in and out of Class Presenter: Mary Ehrenworth

21st Century Community Learning Center

Teaching Children to Read and Comprehend Nonfiction

CURRICULUM PACING GUIDE GRADE/SUBJECT: /English. 1st Nine Weeks 1

2014 Intermediate Literacy Assessment. Teacher Information Guide

Early Literacy Assessment for Learning: Anecdotes from a School in Kosrae

AUDIOBOOKS & LITERACY

Secondary English Language Arts

Reading K 12 Section 35

School and classroom structures for comprehensive ELD instruction

Teaching Reading with Nonfiction - Just the facts, Ma am

Strand: Reading Literature Topics Standard I can statements Vocabulary Key Ideas and Details

Grade 4 Writing Curriculum Map

* Lab Experience Course Code: (1) General Studies/Core (3) Major ** Field Experience (2) Enhanced General Studies (4) Professional Education

Reading W ell. by Third G rade LITE RA C Y PLA N Ogilvie School District Ogilvie, Minnesota

Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students

Teaching Math to English Language Learners

Pre-A Lesson Plan. Students: Date: Lesson # Working with Letters. Letter Activity: Letter formation: Working with Names (Circle 1) Name puzzles.

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Main Idea in Informational Text Grade Three

Ms Juliani -Syllabus Special Education-Language/ Writing

Literacy. Work Stations. Source: Diller, D.(2003) Literacy Work Stations, Making Centers Work

Expository Reading and Writing By Grade Level

Science Notebooks. a tool for increasing student understanding of inquiry and science content a tool for enhancing literacy skills

LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition, Levels A C, correlated to the South Carolina College and Career Readiness Standards, Grades 3 5

Planning Commentary Respond to the prompts below (no more than 9 single-spaced pages, including prompts).

Mix Methods Research. Findings Report. Letters Alive: Case Study

How To Read With A Book

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

How to Take Running Records

ESOL Endorsement Program

The fact that you have this book in your hands means you may already believe that

Assessing Children s Reading Comprehension in K-5. Scott Paris University of Michigan/CIERA

WA TPA. Secondary English- Language Arts. Assessment. Handbook. Teacher Performance. Consortium (TPAC) Field Test Pre-Release Handbook September 2011

TAKU RIVER TLINGIT FIRST NATION LESSONS FOR LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE 4-6

PRE AND POST TEST TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YEARS OF ANIMATED LITERACY AND KNOWLEDGE OF LETTERS STEPHANIE, BUCK. Submitted to

K-12 Information and Digital Literacy

Learning Today Smart Tutor Supports English Language Learners

Reading: The student reads and comprehends text across the curriculum.

Scholastic ReadingLine Aligns to Early Reading First Criteria and Required Activities

Indiana Department of Education

Exhibit 3.3.f.2. Candidate s Score

Meeting the Most Challenging Common Core Standards

The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning

Reading Competencies

Prentice Hall Literature Grade Correlated to: Kansas Reading Education Standards for Grade 8 (Grade 8)

Mary Baldwin College ADP. ED350L: Content Area Reading Online Spring Semester Hours

The Alignment of Common Core and ACT s College and Career Readiness System. June 2010

A Guide for Educators of English Language Learners

English Language Proficiency Standards: At A Glance February 19, 2014

DIRECT INSTRUCTION (DI) Presented by: Sarah Giordano, MA. Carbone Clinic Summer Institute Valley Cottage, NY. July 15-26, 2013.

APPENDIX B CHECKLISTS

Transcription:

Running head: INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 1 Informational Text in the Primary Classroom A Research Project Submitted as a Requirement For The Degree of Masters In Reading Education In The Graduate School Of Texas Woman s University Tamara Hatcher Denton, Texas July 2011

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 2 Introduction: As a first grade teacher I want to give my students every opportunity to learn strategies that will help develop reading comprehension in expository text as well as the traditionally used narrative text. Comprehension is defined as constructing meaning between the text and the reader. The type of text determines the comprehension strategies that are used to make meaning. Narrative text is used most often with young students in grades K-2 nd to teach key elements of text structure. Recommendations from the National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE, 2010) suggest students should be taught main elements such as setting, characters, plot, problem and resolution (2010, p.18) adapting the instruction to the age of the student. There is an additional recommendation to teach text structures using informational text. The consensus of the NCEE panel and researchers is that students can improve their reading comprehension using informational text in the primary grades. Preparing students for standardized testing, that can include up to 80% expository text, is a reality in education today. The lack of exposure and instruction of informational text in the early grades may contribute to the decline in reading achievement and academic success in preparing for the 21 st century (Duke, 2000). Much of the instruction concerning informational text structure has been relegated to third grade and above due to the belief of many educators that young children (Pre-K 2 nd ) do not have the cognitive development to fully comprehend the structures of informational text (Hall, Sabey, & McClellan, 2005; Williams,Hall, Lauer, Stafford, & Desisto, 2005). Researchers feel strongly that educators must include informational text in the primary grades to prepare

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 3 students for the future educational endeavors. (Duke, 2000; Culatta, Hall- Kenyon, & Black, 2010) The panel of National Center for Education and Evaluation (2010) states that students in the early grades should be exposed to informational text because understanding the structure can improve reading achievement. The NCEE and Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) both state the importance of including informational text instruction for children in the early grades to be able to comprehend more complex and varied text. Although these recommendations are based on research, the number of research studies available has been limited in this area (Duke, 2000; Hall et al., 2005; Norman, 2010; Williams, Hall, Lauer, & DeSisto, 2005). In the seminal study by Duke (2000) informational text and contexts as having many or all of the following features were defined: (a) a function to communicate information about the natural or social world, typically from one presumed to be more knowledgeable on the subject to one presumed to be less so; (b)an expectation of durable factual content; (c) timeless verb constructions; (d) generic noun constructions; (e) technical vocabulary; (f) classificatory and definitional material; (g) comparative/contrastive, problem/solution, cause/effect, or like text structures; (h) frequent repetition of topical theme; and (i) graphical elements such as diagrams, indices, page numbers, and maps. (p. 2) The terms nonfiction, expository, and informational text can have different meanings for different people. In current research on informational text these terms have been used to define text that conveys factual information (Hall, Sabey, & McCellan, 2005; Purcell- Gates, Duke, & Martineau, 2007). For the purpose of this paper I define nonfiction as factual information that contains text and/or visual graphics to convey information. The terms nonfiction, expository, and informational text will be used interchangeably.

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 4 My research question is, What are the benefits of using informational text in the primary grades? As I reviewed the research I found three themes. The first theme is the importance of explicit teaching of informational text structure. The second theme is using authentic literacy events that allow students to internalize the strategies used in reading the different genres that can lead to students to become independent learners. The third theme is strategies used to teach expository text. Methodology: As a First grade teacher I am always looking for instructional practices that promote reading comprehension across the curriculum. The increased interest in using more informational text in the primary grades is a factor in my research choice. I began my search using ERIC/Epscohost data base at the Texas Woman s University library website. My search began with the descriptors expository text features and the results were 0. The next 10 tries yielded 0 results using the descriptors of text features, expository text, instruction of genres, comprehension, book captions, elementary and primary. I found 48 results using the descriptors of text features and study, but after reading the abstract I found most of the information was in the form of articles and chapters in books. The few studies that touched on my area of study did not address informational text in the primary grades. I continued my search for several days by looking at reference lists from articles that addressed informational text or expository text in the primary grades. More than half of all reference lists included Duke s (2000) seminal study 3.6 minutes per-day: The scarcity of informational text in first grade. I included the study in my research due to this fact. I continued to search for studies to use in my research by changing the descriptors to informational text, reading comprehension, reader text relationship and reading comprehension yielding more than 350 results. I was able to find 3 studies I included in my

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 5 charts. Still needing more research focused on early childhood and informational text I used vocabulary and read aloud as descriptors that provided 72 results. I was able to find 3 additional studies that addressed nonfiction text and vocabulary development. It was narrowing my search to vocabulary development and read aloud that I was able to find the additional studies on using nonfiction/ informational text with young children. I found that there are many articles and books written on the subject of using nonfiction, informational or expository text with the primary grades. The research articles were based on studies conducted in the 1990 s or books written on the subject, as well as other articles from professional journals. There is an abundance of information on the importance and instructional strategies for teaching informational text in the primary grades but I was unable to find many current research studies specifically geared to expository text in the primary grades. I did use Google search engine to locate additional online articles. I used the phrase teaching informational text primary grades and found many great resources but no articles or studies listed. I found Scholastic had two resources for teachers, the first being a list of the six reasons to use informational text in the primary grades (K- 2 nd ). I then checked the reference list, the references listed were from 1983-2003. After eight days of searching I found most of my information was divided into two groups; informational text with Pre- K Kindergarten students and informational text second grade students. After reviewing the studies on informational text in primary grades, I have included 10 studies that related to my research question, What are the benefits of using informational text in the primary grades? I updated the search to include studies that were dated between 2001 and 2010 and included the age groups from early childhood to third grade. While most of my research studies included teaching informational text to students, one study addresses the issue of the amount of informational text that young children are exposed to in school and in the home.

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 6 Themes Explicit Teaching When students receive explicit teaching of text features and structure of a variety of genres, teachers are able to draw on students knowledge of text structure to deepen understanding and promote independent reading. Students should be exposed to informational text because its structure can build on understanding and recall. The research involving preschool kindergarten children stated that deliberate and explicit instruction is necessary, and they should begin in preschool (Culatta, Hall- Kenyon, & Black, 2010) Studies by Pentimonti, Zucker, Justice, & Kaderavek (2010) support Culatta et al. s findings when students as young as preschool were exposed and taught the specific scientific and text structure vocabulary there was an increase in actual usage of the language in conversations. Teaching expository text involves some of the same comprehension strategies used in narrative text such as using prior knowledge, making connections, teaching key concepts, and explicitly teaching vocabulary. In expository text the connections evolved from text to self, to text to world connections and the vocabulary instruction includes more technical or genre specific vocabulary (Culatta, et al., 2010; Norman, 2010; Hall, Sabey,& McClellan, 2005; Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford, & DeSisto, 2005). The text structure introduced most often in early childhood classes during nonfiction instruction included the concepts compare/contrast (including vocabulary as, alike, different, similar) and problem/solution. The most frequently used text structure was compare/ contrast. In research studies with preschool to second grade children it was found students were able to understand and enjoy nonfiction literature and began to use the language of informational or nonfiction text after the explicit teaching (Maloch, & Beutel, 2009; Pentimonti et al., 2010; Bortnem, 2008). This process of exposing and explicitly

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 7 teaching nonfiction structures and vocabulary allows studenst to become more familiar with the strategies so the students can be more flexible and take control of their own learning (Ranker, 2009). The research on second grade students by Hall et al. (2005) involved a specific program that could be implemented with students during small reading groups to explicitly teach the structure and vocabulary of expository text. Students participating in the Text Structure program were explicitly taught content, major vocabulary words and clue words. The clue words were those that explain the structure of the text. The study used compare/contrast structure that included the clue words, alike, both, but, different, however, and contrast. The results of this study demonstrated that the group that received the explicit teaching scored higher on the post assessments. The results suggest that explicit teaching of text structure is an effective strategy to use with second graders. In a similar study, Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford & DeSisto (2005) the Text Structure program using whole group instruction in contrast to the small group instruction in the previous study. In both Hall et al. (2005) and Williams et al. (2005) the research question addressed explicit instruction of text structures and the effect on text comprehension of expository text, specifically compare/contrast. In both small group and whole class explicit teaching in content, vocabulary, and clue words scored higher in expository text comprehension and suggests that explicit teaching is an effective way to teach some of the components of expository text. As the studies of Hall et al. (2005) and Williams et al. (2005) clearly demonstrated explicit teaching in either small group or whole group was highly effective.

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 8 Research indicates when explicit teaching of text structure and language of informational text is included in the early grades children can increase text comprehension (Culatta et al, 2010; Hall et. al., 2005; Pentimonti et. al., 2010, Purcell- Gates, Duke, & Martineau, 2007; Yopp & Yopp, 2006). Teaching children text structure, text features and genre specific vocabulary in the early grades will help prepare our students for future experiences with informational text. Authentic Experience: Engaging students in authentic experiences is important to understanding informational text. For the purpose of this paper authentic experiences will be defined as experiences in which students participate in activities using informational text for real purposes. In the research studies and articles written about increasing comprehension in kindergarten through second grade students, using multiple genres and text features, there was a consensus that explicitly teaching the features and structure was essential to student s learning. Several studies stated explicit teaching alone may not be enough. When students are given opportunities to practice using the features and structure of expository text in writing or reading after explicit instruction they were able to move towards using the information within learning groups as well as independently (Culatta, Hall- Kenyon & Black, 2010; Moss, 2004; Ranker, 2009; Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford & DeSisto, 2005) Bluestien (2010) states, Research has found that when comprehension strategy instruction is embedded into content area learning, comprehension processes are learned to a higher level (p. 597). Bluestein (2010) also noted that providing authentic instructional experiences will serve to deepen and expand the students understanding of what they read. Purcell- Gates, Duke, & Martineau (2007) completed

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 9 a study concerning the role of authentic experience and explicit teaching and concluded authentic reading and writing activities are essential to genre learning. By providing authentic experiences with explicit teaching, students begin to understand they have an important voice in their own learning process thus giving the student a sense of agency (Johnston, 2004). Across the research, children s trade books in nonfiction literature were used for both teaching and practice. Selecting the right text is important but can be a daunting task for both experienced and novice teachers; however, it is critical in teaching multiple genres. Moss (2004) states if today s students are to meet the literacy demands of the future, they need to engage in authentic literacy tasks with expository text (p.710). Ultimately our goal is to prepare students for the future. Instructional Strategies It was Duke s (2001) study 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational text in first grade that brought awareness to the lack of exposure young children had to informational text in the school setting. Over the course of a school year the study revealed students received on average 3.6 minutes per day of exposure or instruction using informational text. More disturbing were the findings that the lower socioeconomic status classrooms were observed to have on average 1.9 minutes per day exposed to informational text. Duke did observe the most common activity involving informational text was teacher read aloud (p.216). Read alouds provide opportunities for teachers to expose young children to informational text, promote discussions to build prior knowledge and increase vocabulary assisting children in constructing meaning of text (Duke, 2000; Pentimonti, Zucker, Justice, & Kaderavek 2010; Pike & Mumper, 2004).

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 10 Several studies conducted in recent years on informational text in the primary grades found the most common strategy for exposing and teaching informational text to young children was read alouds (Maloch & Beutel 2009; Norman, 2010; Ranker, 2009; Pentimonti, Zucker, Justice, & Kaderavek, 2010). Read alouds expose children to a variety of texts, familiarize children with nonfiction text features, allow students to gain knowledge and participate in social experiences through discussions and think alouds (Norman, 2010; Maloch & Beutel, 2009; Pentimonti et al. 2010; Purcell Gates, Duke&, Martineau, 2007; Ranker, 2009). Maloch & Beutel (2009) found students in a second grade class initiations in discussions were linked to the type of text being used. Students engaged in more challenging discussions and used nonfiction text to clarify confusions and support their ideas while debating with each other. The research using informational text with children as young as preschool found the primary strategy was using read alouds. Teachers were able to expose children to a variety of nonfiction text, build background knowledge, model strategies, build vocabulary and familiarize students with nonfiction text structures (Hall, Sabey,& McClellan, 2005; Moss, 2004; Pentimonti et al., 2010; Pipe & Mumper, 2004; Ranker, 2009). In 2010, the Culatta, Kenyon- Hall, & Black study with preschool children found an effective strategy using a theme based instructional model to teach expository comprehension. The lessons used informational trade books as a prop for instructors to tell the information rather than read from the book. Teachers were able to use personal stories to connect to the topic, and clarify implied information that is important to the understanding of the text. The program addresses vocabulary development in both content area and text structure. The children engaged with the expository information through discussion, dramatization, and hands on experiences. The children were able to understand the compare/ contrast and problem/ solution structure.

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 11 Parents reported that their children were starting to think and talk about things in their lives in terms of problems and solutions (p.335). The study concerning using a systematic instructional program reinforces the idea that preschool children can learn and deal with expository concepts and structures. Using a systematic instructional program that addresses specific text structures in addition to traditional content teaching has been shown to be an effective strategy for teaching expository texts to second grade students. The results of two studies on the Text Structure program found students who participated in the program scored significantly higher than those who had Content Only instruction in understanding expository text. The instructional program for text structures included clue words, reading and analysis of target paragraphs, compare/contrast questions and graphic organizer in addition to content only teaching (Hall, Sabey, & McClellan, 2005; Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford, & DeSisto, 2005). In Williams et al. (2005) study the Text Structure program was presented as whole group instruction. The students participated in two 45 minute lessons per week for approximately nine weeks. In a similar study conducted by Hall et al. (2005) the Text Structure program was included in guided reading group time in which the students met for 20-25 minutes two to three times per week. Each study used the same clue words and the compare/contrast structure, paragraph frame and lesson review discussion. The results from each study found a significant increase in expository comprehension, specifically in the compare/contrast structure using the Text Structure program. In both studies the authors concluded students as early as second grade can benefit from systematic comprehension instruction of expository texts (Hall et al, 2005; Williams et al., 2005).

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 12 Conclusion: It is a goal for educators to provide the tools our students need to be successful not only in their present grade, but in their future academic, social and work lives. In recent years there has been a greater awareness of the need to incorporate informational text in the early grades. Researchers concluded students who have exposure and instruction in informational text will be better prepared for future academic demands (Duke, 2000; Hall, Sabey, & McClellan, 2005; Pentimonti, Zucker, Justice, & Kaderavek, 2010; Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford, & DeSisto, 2005). Providing more experiences with informational text will allow students to be more familiar with the purpose and structures that they may encounter in standardized testing and textbooks used in the later grades. Research supports explicit teaching of text structure, text features, and genre specific vocabulary in the early grades can increase text comprehension and prepare our students for future experiences with informational text (Culatta et al., 2010; Hall et al., 2005; Pentimonti et al., 2010; Purcell- Gates, Duke, & Martineau, 2007; Yopp & Yopp, 2006). The Purcell Gates et al. (2007) study results found explicit teaching is enhanced when combined with authentic literacy experience sharing the opinion of other researchers, authentic reading and writing activities are essential to genre learning ( p.12). The research concluded explicit teaching alone may not be enough when teaching young children informational text. Bluestein (2010) also noted providing authentic instructional experiences will serve to deepen and expand the students understanding of what they read (p.600). Using read- aloud has been shown to be an effective strategy for teaching expository text. Using the practice of read alouds not only exposes children to a variety of nonfiction

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 13 texts,but builds background knowledge, builds vocabulary, and familiarizes students to the structure and features of nonfiction text. The teacher read aloud is a common instructional practice in many early childhood classrooms and can provide opportunities to model and demonstrate strategies used to understand and use nonfiction text. The read aloud experience can facilitate dialogue and discussion to support young students in understanding informational text. Another instructional practice that Hall et al. (2005) & Williams et al. (2005) found to be effective with second grade students is a systematic instructional program. The program included specific teaching points with text structure and genre specific vocabulary in addition to content resulted in students scoring significantly higher on expository text comprehension. The systematic program worked with large and small group settings and proved to be an effective strategy. As early childhood educators incorporate nonfiction text in the instructional day through classroom libraries and instruction, students can begin to develop their expertise in the genre. To put it simply, we live in an expository world. In order for students to succeed in the Information Age they must develop a greater familiarity with and understanding of expository text (Moss, 2004, p.710).

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 14 References Almasi, J. (2002). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guilford Press. Bluestein, N.A. (2010). Unlocking text features for determining importance in expository text: A strategy for struggling readers. The Reading Teacher,63(7), 597-600. Bortnem, G. M. (2008). Teacher use of read alouds using nonfiction in early childhood classrooms. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5, (12), 29-44. CIERA (February, 2010). Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.ciera.org. Culatta, B., Hall, K., & Black, S. (2010). Teaching expository comprehension skills in early childhood classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 323-338. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in the first grade. Reading Research Quarterly. 35(2), 202-224. Duke, N. K.,& Purcell Gates, V. (2003). Genres at home and at school: Bridging the known to the new. The Reading Teacher. 57(1), 30-37. Hall, K.M., Sabey, B. L. & McClellan. (2005). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26, 211-234. Harvey, S. & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers. Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children s learning. Portland, Maine:Stenhouse Publishers. Kelly, M. J. G. & Clausen- Grace, N. (2010). Guiding students through expository text with text feature walks. The Reading Teacher, 64(3), 191-195. Maloch, B. & eutel, D. D. (2009). Big loud voice. You have important things to say : The nature of students initiations during one teacher s interactive read alouds. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 44(2), 20-29. Moss, B. (2004). Teaching expository text structures through informational trade book retellings. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 710-718. Norman, R. R. (2010). Picture this: Process prompted by graphics in informational text. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 14(1&2), 1-39.

INFORMATIONAL TEXT IN THE PRIMARY CLASSROOM 15 Palmer, G. P. (2005). Models for using nonfiction in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 426-434. Pappas, C. C. (2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 226-250. Pentimonti, J. M., Zucker, T. A., Justice, L.M. & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Informational text in preschool Classroom read alouds. The Reading Teacher, 63(8), 656-665. Pike, K. & Mumper, J. (2004). Making nonfiction and other informational texts come alive. Boston, Maine: Pearson Education. Purcell Gates, V., Duke, N. & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre specific text: Roles of authentic experiences and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1),8-45. Ranker, J. (2009). Learning nonfiction in an ESL class: The interaction of situated practice and teacher scaffolding in a genre study. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 580-589. Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N.K., Pearson, P.D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3 rd grade: A practical guide. (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assisstance, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, B. & DeSisto, L.A.(2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 538-550. Yopp, R. H. & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 37-51.