Economic and Financial Determinants of Firm Bankruptcy:



Similar documents
Economic and Financial Determinants of Firm Bankruptcy: Evidence from the French Food Industry

Online Appendix: Tariffs and Firm Performance in Ethiopia

Job reallocation and productivity growth in a post-socialist economy: Evidence from Slovenian manufacturing

The Determinants and the Value of Cash Holdings: Evidence. from French firms

Credit insurance supports companies profitable growth

Autoria: Eduardo Kazuo Kayo, Douglas Dias Bastos

Corporate Bankruptcy System and. Economic Crisis in Korea. Youngjae Lim (

Econometric Analysis of Productivity with Measurement Error: Empirical Application to the US Railroad Industry

World Manufacturing Production

Credit, Labor Informality and Firm Performance in Colombia

Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia

Internet Appendix for Firm Level Productivity, Risk, and Return

Afghanistan Statistical Yearbook

MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN FRANCE

Do Public Subsidies Have an Impact on New Firm Survival? An Empirical Study with French Data

Internet Appendix to Collateral Spread and Financial Development *

Industrial Companies Survey Year 2013

6.3 PROFIT AND LOSS AND BALANCE SHEETS. Simple Financial Calculations. Analysing Performance - The Balance Sheet. Analysing Performance

Editorial Director Jan Smets, Member of the Board of Directors of the National Bank of Belgium

Universal banks vs retail banks during the Great Recession : Do retail banks hedge firms against financial shocks? Job Market Paper.

Domestic Multinationals and Foreign-Owned Firms in Italy: Evidence from Quantile Regression 1

EFFECTS OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON SME PROFITABILITY *

PT - Portugal COUNTRY PROFILE. Portugal R&D Intensity projections, (1) 1 Overall review of EU Member States and Associated countries

Industry Switching in Developing Countries Carol Newman, John Rand, and Finn Tarp. Working Paper No. 1. Abstract

The Relationship Between Computer Networks and Plants Labor Productivity

How To Find Out Why Debt Ratios Have Increased For Emerging Market Firms

INDUSTRY GROWTH, FIRM SIZE AND THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

World Manufacturing Production

Personal Bankruptcy Law, Fresh Starts, and Judicial Practice

Household debt and spending in the United Kingdom

Unique and only research based on all sectors in Turkey

Solutions to Chapter 4. Measuring Corporate Performance

The Effects of State Aid on Total Factor Productivity. Discussion

The Business Credit Index

Small Bank Comparative Advantages in Alleviating Financial Constraints and Providing Liquidity Insurance over Time

Short-Term Debt as Bridge Financing: Evidence from the Commercial Paper Market. The Journal of Finance

Are firms on the right page with Chapter 11? An analysis of firm choices that contribute to post-bankruptcy survival

Financing Constraints, Firm Dynamics, Export Decisions, and Aggregate Productivity

Macroeconomic Instability and Corporate Failure: The Role of the Legal System *

Market Reforms and Efficiency Gains in Chile*

FARMING & RURAL SYSTEMS ECONOMICS edited ty Werner Doppler and Siegfried Bauer

What explains modes of engagement in international trade? Conference paper for Kiel International Economics Papers Current Version: June 2011

BANKS AND SMES: EMPIRICAL QUANTITATIVE APPROACH ON BANKS BEHAVIOUR AS LENDERS TO SMALL BUSINESSES DURING CRISIS TIMES

Stock Markets Correlation: before and during the Crisis Analysis *

The Internationalisation of Spanish Firms

MEASURING AND EXPLAINING MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ACROSS FIRMS AND COUNTRIES

An Empirical Study of Influential Factors of Debt Financing

ENERGY EFFICIENCY INDICATORS and METRICS IN TURKEY

ESTIMATING AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECTS: IV AND CONTROL FUNCTIONS, II Jeff Wooldridge Michigan State University BGSE/IZA Course in Microeconometrics

Contract Enforcement and Firms Financing

Firm Boundaries and Global Sourcing : Evidence from South Korea

DEBT AND EXTINCTION OF FIRMS* 113

Determinants of Capital Structure in Developing Countries

Productivity and the Decision to Import and Export: Theory and Evidence

Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants

How To Calculate Export Earnings

Capital Structure of Non-life Insurance Firms in Japan

WORKING PAPER SERIES FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND FIRMS CASH POLICY IN THE EURO AREA NO 642 / JUNE by Rozália Pál and Annalisa Ferrando

Title: The financing constraints hypothesis and inventory investment decisions of firms.

About AMCC. Since it s establishment, AMCC is a full member of FENCA Federation of European National Collection Associations.

CROSS-COUNTRY HETEROGENEITY IN MFI INTEREST RATES ON LOANS TO NON-FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS IN THE EURO AREA

Credit Contraction and International Trade: Evidence from Chilean Exporters *

Earnings in private jobs after participation to post-doctoral programs : an assessment using a treatment effect model. Isabelle Recotillet

R&D AND ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES OF THE EUROPE 2020 STRATEGY: ASSESSMENT BY THE NEMESIS MODEL

The Bank of Canada s Analytic Framework for Assessing the Vulnerability of the Household Sector

CENTRAL BANK OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

WORKING PAPER SERIES FINANCING OBSTACLES AMONG EURO AREA FIRMS WHO SUFFERS THE MOST? NO 1293 / FEBRUARY 2011

Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Organizational Capital: Finnish Evidence

CPB Discussion Paper 250. The Effects of Outsourcing on Firm Productivity Evidence from Microdata in the Netherlands. Jan Möhlmann Henri L.F.

A DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE DETERMINANTS OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 1

CORPORATE CAPITAL STRUCTURE, PRODUCTIVITY AND ACCESS TO FINANCE

APPLICATION FOR FUNDING

Asymmetric Effects of the Financial Crisis: Collateral-Based Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity Analysis

Business Credit and Deposits Explanatory Notes

Uncertainty, Financial Frictions, and Investment Dynamics

HAS FINANCE BECOME TOO EXPENSIVE? AN ESTIMATION OF THE UNIT COST OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION IN EUROPE

11. Internationalisation and firm productivity: firm and regional level effects. Authors Stefan Groot (PBL) Anet Weterings (PBL)

Health Insurance Decisions, Expectations, and Job Turnover. Randall P. Ellis Boston University and UTS-CHERE Albert Ma Boston University

18 ECB FACTORS AFFECTING LENDING TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND THE SHORT-TERM OUTLOOK FOR MONEY AND LOAN DYNAMICS

Measuring the shadow banking in the Euro area: what does the ECB know?

Online Appendix: Corporate Cash Holdings and Credit Line Usage

option: Evidence from a bank-based economy

Chapter component of the convertible can be estimated as =

Credit booms and the productivity puzzle

Forum for Asian Insolvency Reform (FAIR) MAXIMISING VALUE OF NON- PERFORMING ASSETS

How much is too much? Debt Capacity and Financial Flexibility

MASTER OF APPLIED ECONOMICS

Endogeneity and Price Sensitivity in Customized Pricing

Copyright: SFSO Neuchâtel 2002 Reproduction with mention of source authorized (except for commercial purposes)

EasyPC Training. Accounting Basics

The Financial Characteristics of Small Businesses

Capital Market Financing, Firm Growth, and Firm Size Distribution

TOTAL FDI Inflow to KSA (Millions of dollars) FDI by Source :

Who Loses Under Power Plant Cap and Trade Programs?

Imports, productivity and firm heterogeneity: do origin markets and factor intensity matter?

The Relationship between Trade Credit and Loans: Evidence from Small Businesses in Japan

Household debt and consumption in the UK. Evidence from UK microdata. 10 March 2015

How Do Small Businesses Finance their Growth Opportunities? The Case of Recovery from the Lost Decade in Japan

Agency costs, vertical integration and ownership structure: the case of wine business in France. Julien Cadot, ISG Paris.

Transcription:

Economic and Financial Determinants of Firm Bankruptcy: Evidence from the French Food Industry Lilia Aleksanyan 1 Jean-Pierre Huiban 2 1 Université Paris 1 - Panthéon Sorbonne, INRA and Sciences Po 2 INRA and Université Paris Est - Créteil 17th Workshop on Insolvency Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense 04.02.2015 1/30

Firm bankruptcies in the French Food Industry On average, 1,100 firms file for bankruptcy every year. Resilience during the recent crisis. Dramatic increase of firm bankruptcies in recent period. 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Manufacturing industry Food industry Figure: Bankruptcy rate, % 2/30

Firm bankruptcies in the French Food Industry Each year, on average, nearly 2,700 jobs are concerned. In 2012, more than 4,000 jobs! Figure: GAD group: dead or alive, we ll fight till the end 3/30

Firm bankruptcies in the French Food Industry The economic impact of bankruptcies in terms of firms outstanding debt doubled between 2010 and 2013. 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Outstanding stock of credit to bankrupt NFS, M euros Economic impact of bankruptcies, % (right axis) 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 4/30

This paper To understand firms bankruptcy risk evolution and to identify the determinants of exits due to bankruptcy. Firm size, age Productivity Financing conditions To identify the role of financing conditions in bankruptcy risk, particularly relevant after the recent crisis. To reveal the differences of bankruptcy patterns in the food industry and other manufacturing industries. Very rich firm-level data covering the period 2001-2013. Binary dependent variable econometric modeling for the occurrence of the failure.. 5/30

This paper: Results Higher productivity reduces bankruptcy risk, whereas a higher cost of credit increases bankruptcy risk. Compared to the productivity, we observe smaller effects of firm financial characteristics (credit cost, indebtedness) on firms bankruptcy risk. Productivity appears to have an important beneficial effect on bankruptcy risk reduction. 6/30

A brief literature review Firm efficiency and exit Heterogeneity in firms behavior concerning the decision to exit the market. (Roberts and Tybout 1997, Caves 1998, Bartelsman and Doms 2000) Endogeneous exit decision (the learning model of Jovanovic 1982, Hopenhayn 1992 etc.) Ericson and Pakes 1995 model on firm exit decision and efficiency level; The probability of exit depends on firm efficiency (e.g. Olley and Pakes 1996, Dwyer 1997, Farinas and Ruano 2005, Bellone et al. 2006, Blanchard et al. 2012) 7/30

A brief literature review Firm financing constraints and exit The market selection process can be distorted by credit market imperfections. The financial frictions impact on firms exit. Firms exit due to credit rationing. (e.g. Cooley and Quadrini 2001, Osotimehin and Pappada 2013, Arellano et al. 2009, Albuquerque and Hopenhayn 2004 etc.) 8/30

The economic model: endogenous exit model Based on Ericson and Pakes 1995, Olley and Pakes 1996, Blanchard et al. 2012. The exit decision on the basis of a Bellman equation: V (K it, a it, ω it, r Bit, B it, γ t ) = max{φ, max{r(k it, a it, ω it, γ t ) (1 + r Bit )B it i it + βe[v (K it+1, a it+1, ω it+1, r Bit+1, B it+1, γ t+1 ) Θ t ]}} The exit rule: { 1 (stay), if ωit (K it, a it, r Bit, B it, γ t ) ω χ it = 0 (exit), otherwise In words, a firm decides to exit if Given its capital stock Kit, its productivity shock ω it, its debt level B it, its cost of credit r Bit and its environment at t... it is more profitable to go bankrupt and get the value of bankruptcy, φ, than to keep going and obtain the expected discounted profits from continued operations. (1) (2) 9/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 10/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 Firms bankruptcy database, Banque de France covering the period 2001-2013. 10/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 Firms bankruptcy database, Banque de France covering the period 2001-2013. Full sample of Manufacturing industry firms: over 492,000 firm-year observations covering the period 2001-2013. 10/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 Firms bankruptcy database, Banque de France covering the period 2001-2013. Full sample of Manufacturing industry firms: over 492,000 firm-year observations covering the period 2001-2013. On average, about 35,000 manufacturing companies per year. 10/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 Firms bankruptcy database, Banque de France covering the period 2001-2013. Full sample of Manufacturing industry firms: over 492,000 firm-year observations covering the period 2001-2013. On average, about 35,000 manufacturing companies per year. Two sub-samples: the food industry and manufacturing industry excluding the food industry. 10/30

Data Firms balance sheet database (FIBEN BILAN), Banque de France covering the period 1998-2012 Firms bankruptcy database, Banque de France covering the period 2001-2013. Full sample of Manufacturing industry firms: over 492,000 firm-year observations covering the period 2001-2013. On average, about 35,000 manufacturing companies per year. Two sub-samples: the food industry and manufacturing industry excluding the food industry. Scarce data on bankrupt firms! 2001-2012: 50,000 bankruptcies of manufacturing business units. Fewer than 3,500 observed the year of the failure. Nearly 14,000 observed at most 3 years before the failure. 10/30

Data Bankruptcy definition: judicial reorganization or liquidation proceedings. Firm characteristics: Total factor productivity estimated at firm level using Olley and Pakes 1996 and Levinsohn and Petrin 2003 approach. Cost of credit Bank debt on total assets Age, Size, Sector etc. 11/30

Descriptive statistics Food industry, 2001-2012 No failure Failure % in total obs. Number of firm-year obs. 74,913 650 0,8 SMEs 0.89 0.98 0.9 of which independent SMEs 0.45 0.59 1.1 Intermediate-size and large firm 0.11 0.02 0.2 Very small firm 0.28 0.44 1.3 Small firm 0.18 0.24 1.2 Medium firm 0.20 0.19 0.8 Large firm 0.34 0.13 0.3 Food products and beverages 1 1 0.8 of which Meat industry 0.24 0.40 1.4 Other manufacturing industries 12/30

Descriptive statistics (3) Food industry, 2001-2012 TFP Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 3.59 3.37 3.62 3.86 1 year before 3.70 3.45 3.71 3.99 2 years before 3.81 3.56 3.82 4.08 3 years before 3.89 3.64 3.87 4.13 No failure 4.19 3.84 4.14 4.48 Cost of credit Year of the failure 0.07 0.03 0.06 0.07 1 year before 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.08 2 years before 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.08 3 years before 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.08 No failure 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.07 Other manufacturing industries 13/30

Descriptive statistics (4) Food industry, 2001-2012 Bank debt/total assets Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 0.27 0.08 0.23 0.43 1 year before 0.33 0.14 0.30 0.48 2 years before 0.29 0.12 0.27 0.43 3 years before 0.29 0.13 0.25 0.42 No failure 0.21 0.06 0.17 0.32 Other manufacturing industries 14/30

Descriptive statistics (5) Food industry, 2001-2012 Short-term bank debt/total assets Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.10 1 year before 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.14 2 years before 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.13 3 years before 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.12 No failure 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.04 Profitability Year of the failure -0.06-0.18-0.05 0.05 1 year before -0.03-0.13-0.01 0.07 2 years before 0.02-0.05 0.03 0.10 3 years before 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.12 No failure 0.13 0.05 0.11 0.19 Other manufacturing industries 15/30

Econometric modeling Binary dependent variable model for the occurrence of the failure. We have: { 1, if Bankruptcyit 0 Bankruptcy it = 0, otherwise and (3) Bankruptcy it = X itβ + α i + ɛ it (4) where α i is individual unobserved effect, ɛ it is the model error term. Our model: P rob(bankruptcy it X i,past, β, α i ) = F (α i + X i,pastβ) (5) where X i,past is the mean of past values of X over at most three years (X i,t 1, X i,t 2, X i,t 3 ). 16/30

Econometric modeling (2) The proportion of bankruptcy observations is very low! Endogenous stratification choice-based sampling (Manski and Lerman 1977). Weighted endogenous sampling maximum likelihood method: logl = N w i logf (q i (α i + X iβ)) (6) i=1 with w i = Bankruptcy Q 1 H 1 + (1 Bankruptcy) Q 0 H 0 and q i = 2Bankruptcy 1. Endogeneity of the cost of credit: the average cost of credit in other sectors than the sector of the firm (controling for size and debt level for each year). Two-step approach based on a control function (Rivers and Vuong 1988) 17/30

Results Probit regression of bankruptcy using WEML on choice-based samples, 2001-2013 mean(x i,t 1, X i,t 2, X i,t 3 ) Food industry (1) Manuf. Ind. (excl. Food ind.) (2) Manuf. industry (3) TFP -0.452*** -0.334*** -0.339*** (0.039) (0.011) (0.010) Cost of credit 0.034*** 0.012*** 0.013*** (0.010) (0.003) (0.003) Bank credit / total assets 0.006*** 0.009*** 0.008*** (0.001) (0.000) (0.000) Annual dummies Yes Yes Yes IV Avg credit cost in other sectors Yes Yes Yes Number of obs. 31,961 191,707 223,668 Number of firms 3,582 23,428 27,010 LogL -1538.5-17540.2-19101.0 WEML weight non bankruptcy obs. 1.348 1.350 1.350 WEML weight bankruptcy obs. 0.067 0.068 0.068 * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 Standard errors in parentheses. Panel-robust standard errors. 18/30

Results (2) Probit regression of bankruptcy using WEML on choice-based samples, 2001-2013 mean(x i,t 1, X i,t 2, X i,t 3 ) Food Manuf. Ind. (excl. Manuf. industry (1) Food ind.) (2) industry (3) Age (less than 5 years) ref. ref. ref. Age (5-10 years) -0.068-0.129*** -0.123*** (0.064) (0.020) (0.019) Age (more than 10 years) -0.191*** -0.343*** -0.330*** (0.057) (0.017) (0.016) Very small firm ref. ref. ref. Small firm -0.009-0.149*** -0.138*** (0.041) (0.013) (0.012) Medium firm -0.058-0.189*** -0.179*** (0.044) (0.013) (0.013) Large firm -0.200*** -0.209*** -0.213*** (0.050) (0.015) (0.015) Constant -0.849*** -0.699*** -0.695*** (0.178) (0.056) (0.054) Annual dummies Yes Yes Yes IV Avg credit cost in other sectors Yes Yes Yes Number of obs. 31,961 191,707 223,668 Number of firms 3,582 23,428 27,010 * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 Standard errors in parentheses. Panel-robust standard errors. 19/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (3) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Meat industry Food ind. (excl. Meat industry) Manuf. ind. (excl. Food ind.) Manuf. industry (all sectors) Full sample 0.930 1.488 0.773 1.943 1.795 Very small firm 1.566 2.161 1.371 3.031 2.833 Small firm 1.306 1.913 1.099 1.922 1.853 Medium firm 0.826 1.167 0.756 1.586 1.486 Large firm 0.344 0.598 0.287 1.073 0.929 Age (less than 5 years) 1.962 2.832 1.747 3.835 3.589 Age (5-10 years) 1.504 2.320 1.377 2.899 2.705 Age (more than 10 years) 0.773 1.276 0.626 1.64 1.512 2008 0.925 1.503 0.773 1.542 1.453 2009 0.724 1.200 0.598 2.316 2.073 2010 0.668 1.086 0.568 1.749 1.582 2011 0.786 1.309 0.665 1.678 1.537 2012 1.182 1.783 1.030 1.706 1.624 2013 1.079 1.645 0.939 1.747 1.635 20/30

Results (4) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) TFP Predicted Quantile prob. Manufacturing industry TFP Predicted TFP Quantile prob. Quantile p1 2.907 2.804 2.641 4.679 2.665 4.359 Predicted prob. p10 3.557 1.402 3.337 2.854 3.364 2.619 p25 3.780 1.087 3.645 2.261 3.667 2.069 p50 4.072 0.769 3.958 1.770 3.973 1.617 p75 4.423 0.498 4.266 1.378 4.288 1.244 p90 4.788 0.309 4.601 1.038 4.629 0.926 p99 5.713 0.083 5.523 0.452 5.562 0.389 21/30

Results (4) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % The bankruptcy risk decreases considerably for firms in the upper part of productivity distribution. Food industry Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) TFP Predicted Quantile prob. Manufacturing industry TFP Predicted TFP Quantile prob. Quantile p1 2.907 2.804 2.641 4.679 2.665 4.359 Predicted prob. p10 3.557 1.402 3.337 2.854 3.364 2.619 p25 3.780 1.087 3.645 2.261 3.667 2.069 p50 4.072 0.769 3.958 1.770 3.973 1.617 p75 4.423 0.498 4.266 1.378 4.288 1.244 p90 4.788 0.309 4.601 1.038 4.629 0.926 p99 5.713 0.083 5.523 0.452 5.562 0.389 21/30

Results (4) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % The bankruptcy risk decreases considerably for firms in the upper part of productivity distribution. The productivity effect is lower for food industry firms compared to other manufacturing firms. Food industry Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) TFP Predicted Quantile prob. Manufacturing industry TFP Predicted TFP Quantile prob. Quantile p1 2.907 2.804 2.641 4.679 2.665 4.359 Predicted prob. p10 3.557 1.402 3.337 2.854 3.364 2.619 p25 3.780 1.087 3.645 2.261 3.667 2.069 p50 4.072 0.769 3.958 1.770 3.973 1.617 p75 4.423 0.498 4.266 1.378 4.288 1.244 p90 4.788 0.309 4.601 1.038 4.629 0.926 p99 5.713 0.083 5.523 0.452 5.562 0.389 21/30

Results (5) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % Food industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. p1 0.000 0.523 0.000 1.557 0.000 1.403 p10 0.021 0.636 0.027 1.680 0.026 1.525 p25 0.036 0.724 0.043 1.759 0.042 1.604 p50 0.051 0.824 0.063 1.857 0.061 1.701 p75 0.072 0.989 0.096 2.036 0.093 1.877 p90 0.106 1.313 0.148 2.342 0.143 2.188 p99 0.222 3.208 0.275 3.254 0.270 3.170 22/30

Results (5) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % The effect of cost of credit on bankruptcy risk appears to be less important than that of productivity. Food industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. p1 0.000 0.523 0.000 1.557 0.000 1.403 p10 0.021 0.636 0.027 1.680 0.026 1.525 p25 0.036 0.724 0.043 1.759 0.042 1.604 p50 0.051 0.824 0.063 1.857 0.061 1.701 p75 0.072 0.989 0.096 2.036 0.093 1.877 p90 0.106 1.313 0.148 2.342 0.143 2.188 p99 0.222 3.208 0.275 3.254 0.270 3.170 22/30

Results (5) Predicted probability of bankruptcy, % The effect of cost of credit on bankruptcy risk appears to be less important than that of productivity. The probability of bankruptcy increases almost equally for food industry and other manufacturing industries. Food industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind.) Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. Manufacturing industry Cost of credit Quantile Predicted prob. p1 0.000 0.523 0.000 1.557 0.000 1.403 p10 0.021 0.636 0.027 1.680 0.026 1.525 p25 0.036 0.724 0.043 1.759 0.042 1.604 p50 0.051 0.824 0.063 1.857 0.061 1.701 p75 0.072 0.989 0.096 2.036 0.093 1.877 p90 0.106 1.313 0.148 2.342 0.143 2.188 p99 0.222 3.208 0.275 3.254 0.270 3.170 22/30

Conclusions 23/30

Conclusions Smaller and younger firms are at most vulnerable positions. 23/30

Conclusions Smaller and younger firms are at most vulnerable positions. Among manufacturing sub-sectors, food industry seems to be more resilient towards bankruptcy risks. 23/30

Conclusions Smaller and younger firms are at most vulnerable positions. Among manufacturing sub-sectors, food industry seems to be more resilient towards bankruptcy risks. Bankruptcy predictions based on our model confirm the observed dramatic increase of bankruptcy risk in the French food industry on the recent period. 23/30

Conclusions Smaller and younger firms are at most vulnerable positions. Among manufacturing sub-sectors, food industry seems to be more resilient towards bankruptcy risks. Bankruptcy predictions based on our model confirm the observed dramatic increase of bankruptcy risk in the French food industry on the recent period. Meat industry was mostly responsible for bankruptcy risk evolution between 2010 and 2012. 23/30

Conclusions (2) Higher productivity reduces the bankruptcy risk and, on the contrary, higher cost of credit increases the probability to go bankrupt. 24/30

Conclusions (2) Higher productivity reduces the bankruptcy risk and, on the contrary, higher cost of credit increases the probability to go bankrupt. We find lower effects of firms financial characteristics (credit cost, bank debt level) on their bankruptcy risk. 24/30

Conclusions (2) Higher productivity reduces the bankruptcy risk and, on the contrary, higher cost of credit increases the probability to go bankrupt. We find lower effects of firms financial characteristics (credit cost, bank debt level) on their bankruptcy risk. On contrary, productivity appears having more important beneficial effect on bankruptcy risk reduction. 24/30

Thank you for your attention! Personal website: https://sites.google.com/site/liliaaleksanyan/ 25/30

Descriptive statistics Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind., 2001-2012) No failure Failure % Number of firm-year obs. 417,575 8,402 in total obs. 2,0 SMEs 0,94 0,98 2,1 of which independent SMEs* 0,39 0,53 2,7 Intermediate-size and large firm 0,06 0,02 0,8 Very small firm 0,29 0,44 3,0 Small firm 0,23 0,23 2,0 Medium firm 0,22 0,19 1,7 Large firm 0,25 0,14 1,1 Food industry 26/30

Descriptive statistics (2) Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind., 2001-2012) No failure Failure % Number of firm-year obs. 417,575 8,402 in total obs. 2,0 Young firm (less than 5 years) 0,05 0,08 3,0 Age (5-10 years) 0,14 0,2 2,9 Age (more than 10 years) 0,81 0,72 1,8 Bad BDF rating 0,05 0,17 7,0 Textiles, wearing apparel,etc. 0,07 0,14 3,6 Wood, paper, coke and refined petrol. 0,15 0,16 2,1 Chemicals ; other non-metallic prod. 0,18 0,1 1,2 Basic, fabricated metals 0,24 0,24 2,0 Comp.; machinery, other transport 0,19 0,18 2,0 Furniture, machinery, other manuf. 0,17 0,18 2,2 Food industry 27/30

Descriptive statistics (3) Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind., 2001-2012 TFP Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 3,42 3,07 3,49 3,85 1 year before 3,64 3,32 3,69 4,02 2 years before 3,74 3,42 3,78 4,09 3 years before 3,78 3,46 3,81 4,12 No failure 4,04 3,70 4,02 4,34 Cost of credit Year of the failure 0,09 0,04 0,07 0,12 1 year before 0,09 0,05 0,07 0,11 2 years before 0,09 0,05 0,07 0,11 3 years before 0,09 0,05 0,07 0,11 No failure 0,07 0,04 0,05 0,08 Food industry 28/30

Descriptive statistics (4) Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind., 2001-2012) Bank debt/total assets Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 0,28 0,09 0,23 0,42 1 year before 0,28 0,11 0,24 0,41 2 years before 0,26 0,1 0,22 0,38 3 years before 0,24 0,08 0,20 0,35 No failure 0,17 0,03 0,11 0,25 Food industry 29/30

Descriptive statistics (5) Manufacturing ind. (excl. Food ind., 2001-2012) Short-term bank debt/total assets Mean Q1 Median Q3 Year of the failure 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.12 1 year before 0.10 0.01 0.07 0.16 2 years before 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.15 3 years before 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.13 No failure 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 Profitability Year of the failure -0.10-0.23-0.07 0.04 1 year before -0.02-0.12 0.00 0.09 2 years before 0.04-0.05 0.05 0.14 3 years before 0.08-0.01 0.08 0.16 No failure 0.18 0.06 0.14 0.25 Food industry 30/30