Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application Documentation. 4.1 Appropriate authority to perform and oversee certification of QHPs



Similar documents
6.0 SMALL BUSINESS HEALTH OPTIONS PROGRAM (SHOP)

Affordable Insurance Exchanges: Plan Management Partnership Guidance

MINNESOTA HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE PERFORMANCE PROGRESS REPORT

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange To Date Contract Summary November 2012

Qualified Health Plan Certification. Application Instructions

Considerations for a State-based vs. Federally-Facilitated Health Insurance Exchange

3.0 ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT

SHOP Exchange Technology Enablement Options. March 13, 2012

Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Carrier and Qualified Plan Certification Interim Procedures

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2013-EG-03 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PLAN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 200 Independence Ave SW Washington, DC 20201

Qualified Health Plan: Selection Process and Contracting Plan Management Advisory Group Discussion. February 19, 2013

Utah s Marketplace Approach

PART 1: ENABLING AUTHORITY AND GOVERNANCE

Health Insurance Exchange: State Choices for Health Plan Management

URAC Issue Brief: Best Practices in Network Management

YOUR HEALTH IDAHO 2015 QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN STANDARDS

Adopted by the NAIC Health Insurance and Managed Care (B) Committee on June 27, 2012 Intended for Use by the States as Guidance Only

October 31, Dear Dr. Berwick:

Final Regulations on Health Insurance Exchanges

Small Business Service Bureau Extension (VOTE)

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE

BLUEPRINT FOR APPROVAL OF AFFORDABLE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES

2.6 OPERATING NAVIGATOR PROGRAM 2.7 IN-PERSON ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 2.8 ROLE OF AGENTS AND BROKERS NOVEMBER 2012

From: Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

6/26/2012. Data Requirements for Rate Filings SERFF Requirements Data Required by Federal Regulations. Rate Review in the Exchange

Navigator, Agent and Broker Work Group

2017 IDAHO STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS AND QUALIFIED DENTAL PLANS REVISED

Exchange Final Rule: Indian Provisions

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2011 Session

Engaging Small Businesses and Brokers in State SHOPs

Minnesota Budget Narrative

From: Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO), Title: FINAL 2016 Letter to Issuers in the Federally-facilitated Marketplaces

State Data Collection & Reporting Requirements Under the Affordable Care Act

Questions and Answers for Request for Proposal for Consumer Decision Support Tools for the MNsure Website

FINAL BILL REPORT ESHB 1947

Addressing Network Adequacy Issues With Innovative Business and Delivery Models

Update. Director of Policy and National Health Care Reform Coordinator. Roni Mansur Chief Operating Officer. Board of Directors Meeting March 8, 2012

SERFF v6.0. Bridget Kieras Senior Manager I, SERFF/OPTins April 9, National Association of Insurance Commissioners

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application Documentation

Everything about Exchanges you ve wanted to know... HHS Issues Proposed Rules

Maryland Health Benefit Exchange. Request for Information. SHOP Technology Enablement

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT February 8, 2016

Assessing Consumer Protections in the July 2011 HHS Exchange Regulations

Preparing for 2014 and the Role of the Agent/Broker. Matt Banaszynski Executive Vice President Independent Insurance Agents of Wisconsin

Comments Qualified Health Plan Model Contract Revised Draft (4-3-13) and Updated Redline ( )

Federally Facilitated Marketplace Enrollment Operational Policy & Guidance

The Seven Elements of a Vendor Oversight Program

Adopted by the NAIC Health Insurance and Managed Care (B) Committee on June 27, 2012 Intended for Use by the States as Guidance Only

Nebraska Health Insurance Exchange Update

Overview of Health Insurance Exchanges in the USET Area. USET Impact Week February 4-7, 2013 Washington, DC

Blueprint for Approval of Affordable Statebased and State Partnership Insurance Exchanges

Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange. dba. Access Health CT

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES BULLETIN INS

For The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Hearing September 29, 2015

Request for Information (RFI) for a. Ticket Tracking System for Provider Network Data Systems RFI # 16320

Agent and Broker Participation in the Federally-facilitated Marketplace (FFM): An Overview for States

Health Insurance Exchange Proposed Rules

Initial Guidance to States on Exchanges

PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. Status of Federal and State Efforts to Establish Health Insurance Exchanges for Small Businesses

Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority

Table of Contents. Introduction Definition of Loss Ratio Notes on Using the Results...2. How Rates are Regulated... 4

QHP Dental Frequently Asked Questions Selected Responses May 31, 2013

COVERED CALIFORNIA QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN CONTRACT FOR 2014

Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Navigator Program and Consumer Assistance Commercial Health Plan Interview Guide. Background

Essential Health Benefits and Health Insurance Exchanges: What Are States Up to So Far?

Health Insurance Exchange - A Review of the Basics

Connect for Health Colorado Certified Application Counselor Program Announcement and Designated Organization Application Guidelines

Final Rule on Essential Health Benefits, Actuarial Value, Accreditation. February 26, 2013

Nebraska Health Insurance Exchange Update

Comments Qualified Health Plan Model Contract Updated Redline ( )

COVERED CALIFORNIA QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN CONTRACT. between. Covered California, the California Health Benefit Exchange (the Exchange ) and

Produced by the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. Health insurance exchanges: A strategic perspective

Summary of HBE activities to date A discussion of issues facing large employers as a result of the federal and state legislation

healthpolicybrief Health insurance marketplaces What Ohioans can expect

Delaware s Health Insurance Marketplace: Update on Activity

October 3, Re: File code CMS-9989-P. Dear Director Larsen,

Affordable Care Act at 3: How Colorado s insurance exchange is gearing up for 2014

The Reformed New World of Health Insurance Exchanges. Arthur Lerner Barbara Ryland

Softheon Marketplace Connector Cloud (MC2)

HIMSS Patient-Centered Payer Roundtable. May 16, 2013

APPENDIX B DEFINITIONS

The Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight Network Public Use File Data Dictionary

Off-Exchange Stand-alone Dental Plans and Exchange Certification

AGREEMENT BETWEEN WEB-BROKERS AND THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES ( CMS )

Employee Benefits Planning Association Education Program. Presented by: Melanie K. Curtice Stoel Rives LLP

ISSUE BRIEF: Certification of Dental Plans Offering Pediatric Dental Through an Exchange

Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange dba. Access Health CT:

New York s Commercial Health Insurance Exchange HealthPass New York

Enrollment Updates for MNsure Assisters

How To Let A Small Group Plan In Ohio Choose To Choose To Get A Premium For A Health Plan

MEMORANDUM. Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange Advisory Committees

Federally-facilitated Marketplace Agent and Broker Training Outline and Summary

File Code: CMS 9989 P

Delaware Health Insurance Marketplace Project Update

American Health Benefit Exchanges Fact Sheet A Provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

The future of the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) in Maryland. Presentation to the MHBE Stakeholder Advisory Committee December 10, 2015

ACP Analysis of the Essential Health Benefits Bulletin, Issued by the HHS Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO)

Transcription:

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application ation 4.0 PLAN MANAGEMENT Blueprint Application November, 2012 4.1 Appropriate authority to perform and oversee certification of QHPs Federal law requires that a health insurance issuer offering health plans for sale on the Exchange must have a certification issued by or recognized by the Exchange demonstrating that each health plan it offers on the Exchange is a QHP according to the applicable federal regulations. Additionally, federal law requires that the Exchange have in place a process to ensure that QHP issuers meet various other requirements. In order to meet these federal requirements, the Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange intends to rely upon voluntary extension and application of existing provisions of state law to QHPs offered for sale on the Exchange in 2014 and, where applicable, to QHP issuers with respect to their portfolio of business with the Exchange in 2014. By utilizing this approach, the Exchange will leverage the capacities of existing state regulatory agencies to carry out most components of the certification process, while directly carrying out only some components. ation Guidance Guidance published by the Exchange in October of 2012, describes its authority to develop and perform issuer and QHP certification. 4.2 QHP certification process The Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange is collaborating with regulatory partners at the Minnesota Departments of Commerce and Health to design and implement the certification process as required by law. The certification process will ensure issuers and QHPs meet certification requirements for their portfolio of business associated with the Exchange. The certification process for all QHPs and QDPs to be offered during open enrollment will be completed prior to the beginning of the open enrollment period. For 2014, the Exchange will determine that making a QHP or QDP available on Exchange is in the interest of qualified individuals and employers if the issuer and the QHP meet certification criteria related to their portfolio of business with the Exchange. Legislative action during the 2013 session may change the certification requirements and/or process in future years. Federal Exchange rules establish numerous certification criteria for issuers and qualified health plans. These certification criteria have been addressed through the issuance of the Exchange s guidance on certification criteria, which also includes information about whether the Departments of Commerce or Health will evaluate those certification criteria consistent with their existing statutory responsibilities or whether the Exchange will carry out a specific component of the certification process. 4.0 1 P a g e

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application ation ation 4.2 Bulletin Process SERFF Process State Certification Details concerning the QHP certification process Minnesota Departments of Health and Commerce joint Regulatory Simplification Bulletin SERFF Proposed Exchange Process High level business process flow for QHP certification 4.3 Plan management system(s) or processes that support the collection of QHP issuer and plan data A key goal of the Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange is to offer a variety of affordable and high quality insurance plans to consumers. The Exchange is focusing on market participation and carrier involvement to promote a high level of value and competition in the Exchange. The Exchange is also committed to the development of effective consumer display and choice architecture that will help consumers understand and compare their health and dental coverage options based on available data. ation 4.3 Technical infrastructure contract IT Process flow Details concerning plan management systems and data collection support processes. Maximus Vendor Contract Exhibit A business functional requirements Proposed vendor Health Plan end-to-end process flow 4.4 Ensure ongoing QHP compliance The Exchange will leverage existing complaint investigation and resolution processes at the Departments of Commerce and Health. The Exchange will also accept complaints specific to Exchange operational issues. The Exchange will also leverage other ongoing monitoring and oversight processes at the Departments of Commerce and Health, such as the Department of Health s monitoring of network adequacy as network changes occur. ation 4.0 2 P a g e

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application ation 4.4 Details concerning plan management ongoing compliance monitoring Process Regulatory HMO Process Regulatory Non-HMO http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpsc/mcs/compl aint.htm http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpsc/mcs/report s.htm http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpsc/mcs/quality.htm http://mn.gov/commerce/insurance/images/health- Insurance-Appeal-External-Review.pdf http://mn.gov/commerce/insurance/consumers/tools /complaints/insurance-complaints.jsp Current HMO Regulatory Process Current non-hmo Regulatory Process Individual and Small Group Minnesota HMO Complaint Form and Process Minnesota HMO Reporting Requirements and Oversight Processes Minnesota MCO Quality Assurance and Performance Measurement activities Process for filing an appeal related to a claim through the MN Department of Commerce Process for filing a complaint related to an insurance company 4.5 Support issuers and provide technical assistance The Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange will have systems and staff in place to provide plan issuers with the necessary technical assistance and support activities as needed. Support processes currently in place at the Minnesota Departments of Commerce and Health and SERFF will remain available to Exchange issuers. In addition, the Exchange will directly offer technical assistance on issues specific to Exchange operations and policies. ation 4.5 Chart Details concerning plan management issuer support MN HIX Organizational Chart includes positions provide technical assistance and support to issuers 4.6 Issuer recertification, decertification, and appeals On an annual basis, a formal recertification process will require issuers to submit a written attestation that they continue to meet issuer- and QHP-level requirements. Modifications to rates and benefits will also be reviewed. A QHP may be decertified if the plan or the issuer offering the plan falls out of compliance with certification criteria. Issuers will have the opportunity to appeal Exchange decertification decisions. Both the decertification process and the appeals process will be established over the next several months; stakeholders will have the opportunity to provide feedback on proposed processes before they are finalized. 4.0 3 P a g e

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application ation ation 4.6 Details concerning plan management issuer recertification, decertification, and appeals Technical Infrastructure contract Process IT flow Process SERFF Maximus Vendor Contract Exhibit A Vendor Proposed Health Plan End to End Process Proposed SERFF business process flow 4.7 Timeline for QHP accreditation Carriers, with respect to their portfolio of business with the Exchange, will be required to obtain accreditation through either the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or URAC. Accreditation will occur at the product type level, which will include QHPs offered by the issuer through the Exchange. The Exchange will require issuers to obtain the appropriate level of accreditation in the third year after the issuer offers a QHP on the Exchange. Thus, a carrier that first offers a QHP during 2014 must obtain accreditation by the end of 2016. To the extent a carrier cannot obtain accreditation due to low volume of enrollees, an exception to this certification criterion will be granted until such time the carrier has sufficient volume of enrollees. In addition, a carrier must take the first step of the accreditation process in the first year in which it offers a QHP. ation Guidance Published by the Exchange that establishes certification requirements for issuers and QHPs, including those related to timelines for accreditation 4.8 QHP quality reporting QHP issuers, with respect to their portfolio of business with the Exchange, are required to implement and report on a quality improvement strategy or strategies consistent with the standards of the ACA, disclose and report information on health care quality and outcomes, and implement appropriate enrollee satisfaction surveys. The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight ( CCIIO ) has informed states that these provisions will not be effective under federal rule until 2016. Minnesota will not have requirements related to quality improvement strategies, reporting of health care quality, or implementation of enrollee satisfaction surveys as part of the certification process during 2013. 4.0 4 P a g e

Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange Blueprint Application ation The Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange is working to devise a methodology for a health plan quality rating system and enrollee satisfaction survey system. The Exchange may institute quality reporting and/or enrollee satisfaction survey administration requirements and/or quality improvement strategy requirements after the 2013 certification process that could be effective prior to 2016. ation Guidance Outlines QHP certification criteria, which clarifies that no quality reporting requirements will be required as part of the 2013 certification requirements 4.0 5 P a g e