STATISTICAL BRIEF #117



Similar documents
STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

STATISTICAL BRIEF #137

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

State Tax Information

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

Licensure Resources by State

STATISTICAL BRIEF #113

American C.E. Requirements

State Tax Information

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

$7.5 appropriation $ Preschool Development Grants

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

Healthcare. State Report. Anthony P. Carnevale Nicole Smith Artem Gulish Bennett H. Beach. June 2012

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

ADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement

********************

APPENDIX A. Tables. Appendix A Tables 119

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL

Current State Regulations

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

Please contact if you have any questions regarding this survey.

Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES

Overview of School Choice Policies

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

Use of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

Highlights and Trends: ASHA Counts for Year End 2009

Understanding Socioeconomic and Health Care System Drivers to Increase Vaccination Coverage

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit

Zurich Term Death Benefit Protection With Options

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota

2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

In Brief. Contraception Counts: Ranking State Efforts

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS REPORTING STATE CHILDREN S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM COVERAGE IN THE MARCH 2001 CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY 1

Georgia s Ranking Among the States: Budget, Taxes, and Other Indicators

Library ebook Survey hosted by OverDrive

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)

2013 State Physician Workforce Data Book

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

A Study About Identity Theft

Employment and Earnings of Registered Nurses in 2010

Sources of Health Insurance Coverage in Georgia

Annual Salaries. For additional information, please contact:

Changes in Self-Employment: 2010 to 2011

Full Medical Benefits**

Changes in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans,

JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE DEMOCRATS

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York

Medicare- Medicaid Enrollee State Profile

In 2013, 75.9 million workers age 16 and older in the. Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers, Highlights CONTENTS

Medicaid Topics Impact of Medicare Dual Eligibles Stephen Wilhide, Consultant

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010

2011 State Physician Workforce Data Book

Transcription:

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey STATISTICAL BRIEF #117 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality March 2006 Children s Dental Visits and Expenses, United States, 2003 Erwin Brown, Jr. Introduction Regular dental care, beginning early in childhood, is an important component of health care. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommends that children begin having dental service visits at approximately age 1. 1 Tooth decay (dental caries) is one of the most common chronic infectious diseases among children in the United States. Tooth decay begins early. Among children ages 2 4, 17 percent have already had tooth decay. By the age of 8, approximately 52 percent of children have experienced tooth decay, and by the age of 17, tooth decay affects 78 percent of children. 2 However, tooth decay is, to a large extent, preventable through regular dental cleanings and checkups, the use of sealants, and appropriate diet and oral health care. 3 This Statistical Brief presents estimates based on data from the Household Component of the 2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-HC) on the proportion of children age 17 and under who utilize dental services, by race/ethnicity, age, sex, income, and geographical region. In addition, the data presented in the brief include measures from Healthy People 2010, a set of health objectives to be attained in the U.S. by 2010. Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text. Highlights Slightly more than half of all U.S. children ages 2 17, who were part of a civilian noninstitutionalized family, received dental services during 2003. In 2003, white children were more likely to have at least one dental-related visit than black children, Hispanic children, and children in the other single race/multiple race category. Among children using dental services in 2003 and with a dental expense, those children in high income families incurred higher dental costs than those children in low/ middle income and poor/near poor families. Findings In 2003, approximately 50.9 percent of children between the ages of 2 and 17 living in the civilian noninstitutionalized population had at least one dental-related visit (table 1). This translates into about 33.5 million American children ages 2 17 obtaining at least one dental service visit during 2003. During 2003, a larger percentage of children ages 12 17 (55.4 percent) had a dental visit than children ages 2 11 (48.1 percent). Among all children, whites (59.6 percent) were more likely to have at least one dental visit than any other reported race/ethnic children s group. 1 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Infant Oral Health Care. Available at aapd.org/media /Policies_Guidelines/G_InfantOralHealthCare.pdf. 2 Preventing Dental Caries with Community Programs, Fact Sheet August 2005. CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Oral Health. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/publications/factsheets/dental_caries.htm. 3 Kaste, L. M., Selwitz, R. H., Oldakowski, R. J., Brunelle, J. A., Winn, D. M., and Brown, L. J. (1996). Coronal Caries in the Primary and Permanent Dentition of Children and Adolescents 1 17 Years of Age: United States, 1988 1991. Journal of Dental Research, 75, 631 641. Rockville, Md.: National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Dental Research, Division of Epidemiology and Oral Disease Prevention.

Children residing in high income families (60.1 percent, or 24.2 million) were more likely to have a dental visit than children in low/middle income families (37.4 percent, or 4.0 million) and children in poor/near poor income families (35.8 percent, or 5.3 million). Children residing in the Northeast and Midwest regions (55.3 percent and 55.6 percent, respectively) were most likely to have at least one dental visit compared to children residing in the South (47.7 percent) and the West (48.3 percent) regions. In 2003, the average dental care expense for a child ages 2 17 with an expense and having at least one dental visit was $501 (table 2). For children between ages 12 17 with at least one dental visit, the average dental expense was $742 for the same period. This was more than twice the average annual dental expense of $327 for a child ages 2 11. These differences in expenditures reflect differences in use by age. Among children with a dental services visit in 2003, those children ages 2 11 averaged 2.0 visits per year while older children ages 12 17 averaged 3.4 visits per year. Among children with an expense, expenses incurred for white children and other single race/multiple race children ages 12 17 ($835 and $827, respectively) were significantly higher than those incurred for similar age Hispanic children ($472) and black children ($323). A significant difference in the average expenses for a dental services visit was also evident among children ages 2 11 with respect to race/ethnicity. White children ages 2 11 ($369) with a dental visit had significantly higher average dental expenses than black children ($228) and Hispanic children ($226) in the same age group in 2003. Among those with a dental visit and a dental expense in 2003, those children living in high income families had average dental expenses of $567. This compares with average expenses of $365 for children in low/middle income families and $302 for children living in poor/near poor families. Excluding orthodontic care from these estimates reduces the number of dental visits and the cost of dental care, especially for children between the ages of 12 and 17. When orthodontic care is excluded, the number of visits for all children drops from 2.6 to 1.8; and, for children between 12 and 17, the average number of visits drops from 3.4 to 1.8 (figure 1). Similarly, the average dental expenses for all children drop from $501 to $243; and, for children between 12 and 17, the average dental expense drops from $742 to $268 (figure 2). Data Source The estimates in this Statistical Brief are based on a sample from the dental public use data set of the 2003 MEPS-HC (HC-077B: 2003 Dental Visits file). This data set contains 29,473 dental event records; of these records, 28,920 are associated with persons having a positive person-level weight. This file includes dental event records for all household survey respondents who resided in eligible responding households and reported at least one dental event. Each record represents one household-reported dental event that occurred during calendar year 2003. Dental visits known to have occurred before January 1, 2003 and after December 31, 2003 are not included in this brief. Definitions Dental services/visit Dental services/visit refers to care by or visits to any type of dental care provider, including general dentists, dental hygienists, dental technicians, dental surgeons, orthodontists, endodontists, and periodontists. Dental expenses Expenses are the amount actually paid for dental services. More specifically, in MEPS, expenses/expenditures are defined as the sum of payments for care received, including out-of-pocket payments, and made by private insurance, Medicaid, and other sources. Race/ethnicity Race/ethnicity is coded hierarchically into the following codes: White single race, black single race, Hispanic or Latino, and other single race/multiple race.

Poverty status Income is expressed in terms of poverty status, the ratio of the family s income to the Federal poverty thresholds, which control for the size of the family and the age of the head of the family (see the 2002 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Poverty Guidelines at http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/ 02poverty.htm for more details). In this Statistical Brief, the following classifications were used: Poor: Persons in families at or below the poverty line. Near poor: Persons in families over the poverty line through 125 percent of the poverty line. Low income: Persons in families with income from 125 percent to less than 200 percent of the poverty line. Middle income: Persons in families with income from 200 percent to less than 400 percent of the poverty line. High income: Persons in families with income at or over 400 percent of the poverty line. Region of residence Each MEPS sampled person was classified as living in one the following four regions as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau: Northeast: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Midwest: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas. South: Delaware, Maryland, District of Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas. West: Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and Hawaii. About MEPS-HC MEPS-HC is a nationally representative longitudinal survey that collects detailed information on health care utilization and expenditures, health insurance, and health status, as well as a wide variety of social, demographic, and economic characteristics for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. It is cosponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center for Health Statistics. For more information about MEPS, call the MEPS information coordinator at AHRQ (301-427-1656) or visit the MEPS Web site at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/. References For a detailed description of the MEPS survey design, sample design, and methods used to minimize sources of nonsampling error, see the following publications: Cohen, J. Design and Methods of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. MEPS Methodology Report No. 1. AHCPR Pub. No. 97-0026. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1997. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/mr1/mr1.pdf Cohen, S. Sample Design of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. MEPS Methodology Report No. 2. AHCPR Pub. No. 97-0027. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1997. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/mr2/mr2.pdf Cohen, S. Design Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Medical Care, July 2003: 41(7) Supplement: III-5 III-12. Suggested Citation Brown, E., Jr. Children s Dental Visits and Expenses, United States, 2003. Statistical Brief #117. March 2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md. http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st117/stat117.pdf

AHRQ welcomes questions and comments from readers of this publication who are interested in obtaining more information about access, cost, use, financing, and quality of health care in the United States. We also invite you to tell us how you are using this Statistical Brief and other MEPS data and tools and to share suggestions on how MEPS products might be enhanced to further meet your needs. Please e-mail us at mepspd@ahrq.gov or send a letter to the address below: Steven B. Cohen, PhD, Director Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850

Table 1. Percentage of children ages 2 17 with at least one dental care visit, 2003 Population characteristic Total population (in thousands) Percentage with at least a visit Percentage with at least a visit (age 2 11) Percentage with at least a visit (age 12 17) Total 65,868 50.9% 48.1% 55.4% Race/ethnicity Hispanic 12,253 36.7% 36.1% 37.9% White single race 39,262 59.6% 56.1% 65.0% Black single race 10,042 36.8% 37.1% 36.3% Other single race/multiple race 4,311 45.3% 39.5% 55.1% Gender Male 33,745 49.5% 47.6% 52.4% Female 32,123 52.5% 48.6% 58.7% Income Poor/near poor 14,888 35.8% 37.0% 33.7% Low/middle income 10,664 37.4% 34.8% 42.4% High income 40,315 60.1% 56.6% 65.2% Census region Northeast 11,613 55.3% 52.7% 59.4% Midwest 14,569 55.6% 51.9% 61.4% South 23,835 47.7% 44.9% 52.3% West 15,851 48.3% 46.3% 51.5% Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003

Table 2. Number of dental care visits and expenses for children ages 2 17 with at least one visit, 2003 Population characteristic Total population (in thousands) visit with a visit expense with a visit visit with a visit (age 2 11) expense with a visit (age 2 11) visit with a visit (age 12 17) expense with a visit (age 12 17) Total 65,868 2.6 $501 2.0 $327 3.4 $742 Race/ethnicity Hispanic 12,253 2.1 $313 1.8 $226 2.6 $472 White single race 39,262 2.8 $571 2.2 $369 3.7 $835 Black single race 10,042 1.8 $265 1.6 $228 2.0 $323 Other single race/multiple race 4,311 2.6 $538 1.9 $295 3.4 $827 Gender Male 33,745 2.5 $516 2.0 $340 3.2 $767 Female 32,123 2.7 $486 2.0 $314 3.5 $717 Income Poor/near poor 14,888 1.9 $302 1.7 $213 2.4 $484 Low/middle income 10,664 2.3 $365 2.0 $289 2.8 $483 High income 40,315 2.8 $567 2.1 $365 3.6 $821 Census region Northeast 11,613 2.8 $610 2.1 $357 3.7 $960 Midwest 14,569 2.7 $433 2.0 $272 3.6 $641 South 23,835 2.5 $429 2.0 $308 3.1 $600 West 15,851 2.5 $587 2.0 $386 3.2 $884 Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003

Figure 1. number of dental visits for children ages 2 17 with a visit, United States, 2003 All dental visits Excluding orthodontist visits 4 3.4 3 2.6 2 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.8 1 0 Ages 2-17 Ages 2-11 Ages 12-17 Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003 Figure 2. expense per child with a dental visit and expense for children ages 2 17, United States, 2003 All dental visits Excluding orthodontist visits 800 742 600 501 Dollars 400 243 327 226 268 200 0 Ages 2-17 Ages 2-11 Ages 12-17 Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003