Cloud Performance Benchmark Series



Similar documents
Cloud Computing Workload Benchmark Report

UBUNTU DISK IO BENCHMARK TEST RESULTS

CLOUDSPECS PERFORMANCE REPORT LUNACLOUD, AMAZON EC2, RACKSPACE CLOUD AUTHOR: KENNY LI NOVEMBER 2012

Rackspace Cloud Servers Analysis A comparison of cloud servers across Generations of Rackspace Cloud Offerings

DVS-100 Installation Guide

DVS-100 Installation Guide

CloudHarmony Performance Benchmark: Select High-Performing Public Cloud to Increase Economic Benefits

Benchmarking Large Scale Cloud Computing in Asia Pacific

Running R from Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud

THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE FOR AWS CLOUD EC2 FAMILIES

StACC: St Andrews Cloud Computing Co laboratory. A Performance Comparison of Clouds. Amazon EC2 and Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud

SIDN Server Measurements

ACANO SOLUTION VIRTUALIZED DEPLOYMENTS. White Paper. Simon Evans, Acano Chief Scientist

Technology and Cost Considerations for Cloud Deployment: Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) Case Study

Comparing major cloud-service providers: virtual processor performance. A Cloud Report by Danny Gee, and Kenny Li

Performance and scalability of a large OLTP workload

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud Getting Started Guide. My experience

Performance test report

Performance Characteristics of VMFS and RDM VMware ESX Server 3.0.1

IaaS Performance and Value Analysis A study of performance among 14 top public cloud infrastructure providers

Comparison of Windows IaaS Environments

Cloud Performance Benchmark Series

Cornell University Center for Advanced Computing

Server Software Installation Guide

Virtuoso and Database Scalability

Configuring Apache Derby for Performance and Durability Olav Sandstå

Cloud Analysis: Performance Benchmarks of Linux & Windows Environments

Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2

Benchmarking FreeBSD. Ivan Voras

Variations in Performance and Scalability when Migrating n-tier Applications to Different Clouds

Performance Analysis: Benchmarks of Bare-Metal & Virtual Clouds

Cloud security CS642: Computer Security Professor Ristenpart h9p:// rist at cs dot wisc dot edu University of Wisconsin CS 642

Building a Private Cloud with Eucalyptus

Cloud Computing through Virtualization and HPC technologies

HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief

Performance Analysis: Benchmarking Public Clouds

AlphaTrust PRONTO - Hardware Requirements

Understanding the Benefits of IBM SPSS Statistics Server

Cloud Computing Performance. Benchmark Testing Report. Comparing ProfitBricks vs. Amazon EC2

Tunebot in the Cloud. Arefin Huq 18 Mar 2010

System Requirements Table of contents

Performance Benchmark for Cloud Databases

Products for the registry databases and preparation for the disaster recovery

Autodesk Inventor on the Macintosh

Cloud IaaS Performance & Price-Performance

Performance of Host Identity Protocol on Nokia Internet Tablet

Cloud Computing and E-Commerce

CPU Benchmarks Over 600,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database on Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud

Cornell University Center for Advanced Computing

ZVA64EE PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK SOFINTEL IT ENGINEERING, S.L.

ACE Management Server Administrator s Manual VMware ACE 2.6

Performance Test Report: Novell iprint Appliance 1.1

Powered by Intel Cloud Technology

VirtualCenter Database Performance for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 VirtualCenter 2.5

Zeus Traffic Manager VA Performance on vsphere 4

How To Test For Performance And Scalability On A Server With A Multi-Core Computer (For A Large Server)

Private Distributed Cloud Deployment in a Limited Networking Environment

How swift is your Swift? Ning Zhang, OpenStack Engineer at Zmanda Chander Kant, CEO at Zmanda

Hardware and Software Requirements. Release 7.5.x PowerSchool Student Information System

Enabling Technologies for Distributed and Cloud Computing

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF KERNEL-BASED VIRTUAL MACHINE

User Guide. NAS Compression Setup

Hey, You, Get Off of My Cloud! Exploring Information Leakage in Third-Party Clouds. Thomas Ristenpart, Eran Tromer, Hovav Shacham, Stefan Savage

OTM in the Cloud. Ryan Haney

DataCenter optimization for Cloud Computing

Cloud Computing Performance Benchmarking Report. Comparing ProfitBricks and Amazon EC2 using standard open source tools UnixBench, DBENCH and Iperf

Cloud IaaS Performance & Price-Performance

Deep Dive: Maximizing EC2 & EBS Performance

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

PC Business Banking. Technical Requirements

ZEN NETWORKS 3300 PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK SOFINTEL IT ENGINEERING, S.L.

ACE Management Server Deployment Guide VMware ACE 2.0

Maximum performance, minimal risk for data warehousing

Accelerating Enterprise Applications and Reducing TCO with SanDisk ZetaScale Software

Cloud Computing on Amazon's EC2

Performance Testing of a Cloud Service

Scaling Objectivity Database Performance with Panasas Scale-Out NAS Storage

PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS IN TreeAge Pro 2014 R1.0

AppDynamics Lite Performance Benchmark. For KonaKart E-commerce Server (Tomcat/JSP/Struts)

WHITE PAPER: BEST PRACTICES. Sizing and Scalability Recommendations for Symantec Endpoint Protection. Symantec Enterprise Security Solutions Group

PassMark - CPU Mark Multiple CPU Systems - Updated 17th of July 2012

Amazon EC2 XenApp Scalability Analysis

VMware Virtual SAN Backup Using VMware vsphere Data Protection Advanced SEPTEMBER 2014

Proval LS Database & Client Software (Trial or Full) Installation Guide

9/26/2011. What is Virtualization? What are the different types of virtualization.

How To Compare Amazon Ec2 To A Supercomputer For Scientific Applications

Cloud Based Tes,ng & Capacity Planning (CloudPerf)

An Oracle Benchmarking Study February Oracle Insurance Insbridge Enterprise Rating: Performance Assessment

Transcription:

Cloud Performance Benchmark Series Amazon EC2 CPU Speed Benchmarks Kalpit Sarda Sumit Sanghrajka Radu Sion ver..7

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 2 1. Overview We document here an experimental evaluation of the throughput and costs of the Amazon EC2 compute infrastructure. 2. Setup At the time of writing, Amazon EC2 provides 8 different types and On-Demand instances to work on. The Amazon results were compared with two separate local lab setups: an Intel Core 2 Duo laptop and a dual-cpu Intel Xeon CPU Server. The table below shows associated machine configurations and hourly costs. Instance Type & RAM CPU/ Cost per hour (USD) Platform (GB) No. of EC2 compute units East (US) West US, EU & APAC Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T65 NA NA Laptop 64 4 @ 2.1GHz (Total Cores: 2) 2 x Intel Xeon CPU X546 @ NA NA Server 64 8 3.15GHz (Total Cores: 8) m1.small 32 1.7 1 EC2 compute unit*.85.95 m1.large 64 7.5 4 EC2 compute units*.34.38 m1.xlarge 64 15 8 EC2 compute units*.68.76 m2.xlarge 64 17.1 6.5 EC2 compute units*.5.57 m2_2xlarge 64 34.2 13 EC2 compute units* 1. 1.14 m2_4xlarge 64 68.4 26 EC2 compute units* 2. 2.28 c1_xmedium 32 1.7 5 EC2 compute units*.17.19 c1_xlarge 64 7 2 EC2 compute units*.68.76 *One EC2 Compute Unit provides the equivalent CPU capacity of a 1.-1.2 GHz 27 Opteron or 27 Xeon processor. We deployed the Phoronix Test Suite to benchmark the computation throughput in a comprehensive set of scenarios and applications. Phoronix explores tens of different core applications from areas such as data compression, media encoding, cryptography, graphics rendering, scientific computation, database query processing and web serving. We also ran UBENCH to get a more thorough throughput figure at a fundamental RAM/CPU level. The allocated instances were running Ubuntu in controlled close to single-user mode. For comparison, we had run also a few Windows instances results were virtually identical. One of the interesting insights that can be glanced from the figures below is that the CPU performance/cost ratio is best (often by orders of magnitude) for the small instance type. This suggests that computation-rich EC2 deployments should most likely deploy multiple small instances instead of fewer large ones.

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 3 3. Phoronix Test Suite Results 3.1. LAME MP3 Encoding LAME is an MP3 encoder licensed under the LGPL. This test measures the time required to encode a WAV file into MP3 format. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 12 1 8 6 4 2 LAME MP3 Encoding Seconds 3.2. FFmpeg This test uses FFmpeg for testing the system's audio/video encoding performance. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Ffmpeg Seconds

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 4 3.3. OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 496-bit performance of OpenSSL. Performance is measured in signatures per second (higher is better). 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 OpenSSL Signatures per Second 3.4. C-Ray C-Ray, is a raytracer designed to test floating-point CPU performance. This test is multithreaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 16 x 12 image. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 25 2 15 1 5 C R a y Seconds

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 5 3.5. PovRay POV-Ray is the Persistence of Vision Raytracer. POV-Ray is used to create 3D graphics using ray-tracing. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 POV Ray Seconds 3.6. John The Ripper John the Ripper is a popular password cracker. Performance is measured in cracking combinations (of username and password) per second. Numbers for DES and Blowfish ciphers are shown (higher is better). 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 John The Ripper (DES) Passwords Cracked per Second

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 6 John The Ripper (Blowfish) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Passwords Cracked per Second 3.7. Parallel bzip2 Compression This test measures the time needed to compress a file using BZIP2 compression deploying 16 parallel threads. A 256MB file is used for compression. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). Note that this also includes I/O. 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Parallel BZIP2 compression Seconds

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 7 3.8. 7-Zip This is a test of 7-Zip using p7zip with its integrated benchmark feature. Performance is measured in MIPS (higher is better). 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 7-zip MIPS 3.9. FLAC Audio Encoding This test times how long it takes to encode a sample WAV file into a FLAC format. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 5 4 3 2 1 FLAC Audio encoding Seconds

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 8 3.1. x264 encoding This is a test of the x264 H.264/AVC encoder throughput. Performance is measured in frames per second (higher is better). 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 x264 Frames per Second 3.11. Himeno Himeno is a linear solver of pressure Poisson using a point-jacobi method. Performance is measured in MFLPOS (higher is better). 25 2 15 1 5 Himeno MFLOPS

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 9 3.12. Timed MAFFT Alignment This test performs an alignment of 1 pyruvate decarboxylase sequences using the MAFFT software. Performance is measured in seconds (lower is better). 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Timed MAFFT Alignment Seconds 3.13. pgbench pgbench is a benchmark of PostgreSQL. It repeatedly runs a sequence of SQL commands, and then calculates the average transaction rate (transactions per second). By default, pgbench tests a scenario that is loosely based on TPC-B, involving five SELECT, UPDATE, and INSERT commands per transaction. Performance is measured in Transactions per second (higher is better). Note this includes I/O. 6 5 4 3 2 1 PostGreSQL pgbench Transactions per Second

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 1 3.14. Stream The STREAM benchmark is a synthetic benchmark that measures sustainable memory bandwidth (in MB/s) (higher is better). 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Stream Copy Bandwidth (MB/Sec) 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Stream Scale Bandwidth (MB/Sec)

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 11 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Stream Add Bandwidth (MB/Sec) 25 Stream Triad 2 15 1 5 Bandwidth (MB/Sec)

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 12 3.15. TSCP This is a performance test of TSCP, Tom Kerrigan's Simple Chess Program, which has a built-in performance benchmark. Performance is measured in nodes searched per second (higher is better). Note: TSCP would not compile on the Xeon lab server. 3 25 2 15 1 5 TSCP Nodes per Second 3.16. Apache Benchmark The Apache Benchmark measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when faced with a total of 5, requests, with a degree of concurrency of 1. Performance is measured in Requests per second (higher is better). Note: ab did not compile for the Xeon server. 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Apache benchmark Requests per Second

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 13 4. UBENCH Test Suite Results UBENCH provides a single measure of performance for machines running various unix flavors. It tests both RAM and CPU throughput. The CPU results are achieved by executing integer and floating point calculations for 3 mins concurrently using multiple threads. The ratio of floating point calculations to integer is about 1:3. The RAM results are obtained by executing allocation and copying operations for 3 mins concurrently using several threads. 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Ubench CPU Ubench CPU 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Ubench MEM Ubench MEM

C l o u d B e n c h m a r k s : C o m p u t i n g o n A m a z o n E C 2 14 5. Costs 2.5 Cost per Compute Cycle EAST US 2 1.5 1.5 picocents 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 Cost per Compute Cycle WEST US, EU and APAC picocents