1. New Common Law Lodgements and Benefit Delivery Scheme Overview



Similar documents
b. Common law Overview o This report now presents the regular data diagrammatically as a pie chart.

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT OF NSW & THE DEPARTMENT OF PREMIER AND CABINET

Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010)

An Introduction to Work Injury Damages

Personal Injury Claim Information Guide. A step-by-step guide to your Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance claim

Personal Injury Claim Information Guide A step-by-step guide to your Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance claim

No-Fault Automobile Insurance

Registrar's Practice Guide for Work Injury Damages in the Workers Compensation Commission

Claim Estimates and WorkSafe Premiums

Workers Compensation Amendment (Legal Costs) Regulation 2009

Employer commencement as a self-insurer

Injury Schemes a lawyer s perspective Ian Brown Vice President and President Elect, Queensland Law Society

Accident Compensation Act

Policy and Procedure for Claims Management

in the Northern Territory

1.1 Australian Capital Territory 1.2 New South Wales 1.3 Northern Territory 1.4 Queensland

DUST DISEASES CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROCESS: DATA FOR

Amendments History No Date Amendment 1 July 2015 Policy re approved with Job titles and roles updated

Common law applies. Generally calculated at 9% of Past Economic Loss. Interest recoverable on the net loss i.e. less refunds.

Government Response to the Hanks Enquiry / Accident Compensation Act Amendment Bill

SCHEDULE 3 Generalist Claims 2015

ILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation

Georgia Board for Physician Workforce

Ministerial Directions under section 104A

Common law in the workers compensation setting

CIVIL LITIGATION ASSISTANCE SCHEME CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE

How To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012

CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD.

Brief Overview of MMPR Requirements What are the elements of the elements of a reportable medical malpractice payment

C.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide

Personal Injury Claim Pack. A guide to your compulsory third party (CTP) insurance claim

THE CASE FOR COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY INSURANCE REFORM IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

B U R T & D A V I E S PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS TAC CLAIMS SERIOUS INJURY

10.4 The ICF and accident compensation in Australia

GUIDELINES FOR CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATION FOLLOWING THE DEATH OF A WORKER

WorkCover claims. Report 18:

MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES SOUTH AUSTRALIA

A GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT

LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria. A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car or motor vehicle, a railway train, or a tram.

Office of Industrial Relations Workers Compensation Regulator. Workers Compensation Regulator Statistics Report

MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM*

CLAIMS HANDLING GUIDELINES. for CTP Insurers

GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS

A glossary for injured workers Who s who in the claims process

VMIA advice to the Victorian Competition & Efficiency Commission Inquiry into Aspects of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)

CTP PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM INFORMATION KIT

Public Record Office Standard. Retention & Disposal Authority for Records of the Transport Accident Prevention and Assistance Functions

Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA)

DISCUSSION PAPER. The Queensland Workers Compensation Scheme: Ensuring Sustainability and Fairness

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95

COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION

CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

Claims Management Policy

Tort Reform: Scheme Impact

How To Make A Claim In The Uk

Information for people injured in road crashes

GUIDELINES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION & INJURY MANAGEMENT

Comcare Asbestos Related Compensation Claims & Workers Compensation Claim Management

CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY #1.

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

English Civil Law and the Foreign Motorist. Justice or a Lawyer s Lunch?

Claims Assessment and Resolution Service Assessor Guidance Material

Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice

Consultation Report. Consultation Report: Personal Injuries (Liabilities and Damages) Act - Assessments of Permanent Impairment JUNE 2015

Personal Injury Compensation Guide

Personal injury claims advice solicitors

General Insurance Conditions (GIC) Clinical Trials in Human Research

UNDERSTANDING THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES / MVA WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Your Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim

Levy & McRae CLAIMS IN SCOTLAND

QUEENSLAND TRUCKING ASSOCIATION LTD

Claim for Compensation for a Work-related death Employer Information

SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE HEALTH DEPARTMENT THE RECOVERY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE COSTS IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION

How To Manage Claims At The Trust

Insurer audit manual

A guide to professional negligence claims for personal injury victims

Duty of Care. Kung Fu Instructor in Training Program. Shaolin Guardian Network

Frequently Asked Questions: Compulsory Third-Party Insurance in the ACT

Personal Injury Multi-Track Code

MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE DISPUTES: TIME FOR A POSITIVE CHANGE

Compulsory land acquisition

Insurance Commission of Western Australia

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION

Transcription:

Legal Liaison Group Information Paper 10 April 2015 Key Issues Update Context and purpose To provide an update to LLG on litigation and related issues. Discussion/Issues 1. New Common Law Lodgements and Benefit Delivery Scheme Overview New Applications WorkSafe have received 2737 (an average of 228 new common law lodgements per month) for the 12 months to 31 March 2015. Of these applications, 4% are deemed (IB30+) and 25.8% are pain and suffering (PS) only. The following chart shows the lodgements to 31 March 2015. Page 1

Pre-Litigated Serious Injury Determination WorkSafe and panel firm focus has continued to be on the quality of initial decision making. The proportion of serious injury decisions resolved within 120 days is 62% (including deemed). On average, around 400 matters per quarter have the serious injury decision finalised within 120 days. However the last quarter has seen big increase in the serious injury decision finalised within 120 days because of the OM project undertaken by WorkSafe. The majority of these matters access common law via the narrative. Page 2

Pre-Litigated Statutory Conference (Damages) Resolution in the pre-litigated statutory conference (damages) phase also remains strong - at approximately 79% of resolutions during the last 12 months to 31 March 2015. Originating Motion The number of outstanding Originating Motions was 953 at 31 March 2015 (down from 1294 at the same time last year). Outstanding Damages Writs The number of outstanding damages writs was 628 at 31 March 2015 (down from 727 at the same time last year). Resolution Timeframes The following table shows the average time taken for matters to resolve depending on the different litigation phases required for resolution (months are from application received to case resolved). Average Months Taken For Resolution (Case Resolved Year) Proportion of matters Litigation Phases Where Matter Resolved 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 1 2014/2015 1 Pre-Litigated Serious Injury and Pre-Litigated Damages 6.6 6.6 6.3 47% Originating Motion Serious Injury and Pre-Litigated Damages 21.0 20.3 20.2 38% Pre-Litigated Serious Injury and Damages Writ 25.2 25.1 27.1 10% Originating Motion Serious Injury and Damages Writ 38.9 43.2 45.1 5% 1 Note 2014/2015 represents resolutions for 2014Q3, 2014Q4, and 2015Q1 Page 3

2. New Common Law Liability Management Scheme Overview Serious Injury Decisions Finalised for the 12 months to 31 March 2015 The total number of serious injury (SI) decisions finalised in the last 12 months is 3043. 1727 (56.8%) matters had a serious injury decision finalised without the issue of an originating motion. Pre Litigated Serious Injury Decisions Application Type Both Heads PS Only Total 1185 542 Deemed (IB30+) 9.3 %. Both Heads 49.7 %. P&S Only 36.2 % 90.4 % Withdrawn or Not Issued 4.5 % 9.5 % A further 1076 (35.4%) matters finalised with either a concession or a withdrawal. Of the concessions where the application was for both heads, 52.4% accepted PS only. OM Concessions & Withdrawals Application Type Both Heads PS Only Total 824 252 Both Heads 43.2 %. P&S Only 47.5 % 73.8 % Withdrawn or Not Served 9.2 % 26.1 % 240 (7.9%) matters were finalised with a Court judgement. OM Judgement Outcomes Application Type Both Heads PS Only Total 148 92 Both Heads 64.1 %. P&S Only 14.8 % 69.5 % Denied 20.9 % 30.4 % Page 4

The following chart shows the overall grant rate trend and the proportion of cases with SI granted for either both heads (economic loss and pain and suffering) or pain and suffering only. These trends should be looked at in the context of the increase in common law applications. Average Damages Outcomes for the 12 months to 31 March 2015 Deemed (IB30+) 12 Months to 31 March 2015* WorkSafe Payments Number of Settlements 132 Total Payments Including Third Parties Average Damages $256,245 $281,214 Median Damages $220,000 $237,500 Both Heads Number of Settlements 1051 Average Damages $254,523 $277,757 Median Damages $250,000 $270,000 P&S Only Number of Settlements 1611 Average Damages $85,615 $93,073 Median Damages $81,576 $90,000 *Data includes zero settlements. Data based on settlement amounts and therefore implicitly allows for reductions due to contributory negligence. Deemed, Both Heads and P&S Only refer to the serious injury outcome. Around 58% of all new common law settlements have been for pain & suffering only. Page 5

3. Objective Assessment of Serious Injury Certificates WorkSafe undertakes an objective assessment of applications to assist with decision making, although each application is still considered on its individual merits. The assessment considers the injured worker s profile such as injury type and level of no-fault compensation received. This assists with ensuring the long term financial sustainability of common law by managing thresholds, balanced with ensuring timely delivery of settlements to the more obviously seriously injured workers. Further background information is available in previous key issues papers provided to the LLG. Considering just the impairment assessment, the following chart shows the number of applications with a greater than 10% assessment has remained reasonably stable. However, the growth has been in applications in the 5% to less than 10% range and less than 5% range. Since 1 January 2013, 63% of applications had an impairment assessment of <10% or have not gone through the impairment process. Page 6

Considering the weekly compensation, the following chart shows the number of applications: active on weekly with greater than 130 weeks compensation has reduced (black line); active on weekly but less than 130 weeks compensation has grown (green line); not active on weekly with more than 75 weeks of compensation in the past has grown (blue line); not active on weekly with less than 75 weeks of compensation in the past has grown (red line). Since 1 January 2013, 35% were in this category. Page 7

4. Pain and Suffering Only Under Fixed Cost Model (FCM) The FCM was introduced in October 2010. Since that time there has been a significant change in the proportion of applications received for pain and suffering only. This was expected as the FCM structure was designed to encourage earlier decision making on the potential success of the economic loss component of an application. However since 2013Q2, the proportion of lodgements for pain and sufferings only has reduced from the higher proportion in 2013Q1. The following chart shows the lodgements updated to 31 March 2015. The FCM structure also provided for the provision of a notice for pain and suffering only, where the defendant believes the injured worker meets the pain and suffering aspect of the serious injury threshold but not the economic loss component. The Notice has an impact on the plaintiff costs entitlements if they do not accept the offer of pain and suffering only. The following table provides information on the use of the Notice. Serious Injury Outcome Notice Quarter Both Heads PS Only Unresolved Total Judgement Other Judgement Other 2012Q2 1 3 1 3 8 2012Q3 1 5 4 10 2012Q4 2 2 3 7 2013Q1 4 8 1 8 3 24 2013Q2 5 12 1 12 30 2013Q3 3 7 1 10 21 2013Q4 1 4 7 1 13 2014Q1 11 11 9 31 2014Q2 2 4 7 5 18 2014Q3 6 15 11 32 2015Q1 1 9 10 Total 17 63 6 80 38 204 Page 8

5. Plaintiff Costs Management The new Fixed Cost Model was introduced for plaintiff party-party costs for originating motions on 28 October 2010. This will apply to all applications lodged after this date. WorkSafe s costs consultants continue to add value where they are involved in the resolution of plaintiff legal costs with significant reductions from the claimed amounts. There are 280 outstanding invoices for originating motions that have been received but are yet to be paid. Out of 280 outstanding invoices, 64 invoices are for Pre FCM matters and 216 invoices for FCM matters. Page 9