ONC HIT Certification Program



Similar documents
ONC HIT Certification Program

ONC HIT Certification Program

ONC HIT Certification Program

STANDARDS. MEANINGFUL USE 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Stage 2 Objective Edition EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 45 CFR

Certification Guidance for EHR Technology Developers Serving Health Care Providers Ineligible for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments

Drummond Group, Inc. Re: Price Transparency Attestation

TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Drummond Group Inc. EHR Certification Guide. January 9, 2013

The Meaning Behind Meaningful Use Stage 2

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0

Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 7 of 17 Stage 2 Date issued: August, 2014

GE Healthcare Detailed Comments

Interoperability Testing and Certification. Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015

Certificate of EHR Compliance

Interim Final Rule on Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Quality Manual ISO/IEC Mandatory Disclosure Attestation

Drummond Group LLC. EHR Certification Guide

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015

CMS EHR Incentive Programs:

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

HealthFusion MediTouch EHR Stage 2 Proposed Rule Comments

How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Drummond Certified Health IT Certificate and Marks Usage Requirements

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Eligible Professional EHR Incentive Program Objectives and Measures for 2016 Objective 10 of 10 Date updated: February 4, 2016

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

Drummond Group LLC. EHR Testing Guide. August 13, 2015

Drummond Group Inc. EHR Testing Guide. January 9, 2013

HITECH MEANINGFUL USE

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Transcription:

ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification Part 1: Product and Developer Information 1.1 Certified Product Information Product Name: Business Intelligence Product Version: v4.0 Domain: Inpatient Test Type: Modular EHR 1.2 Developer/Vendor Information Developer/Vendor Name: MEDHOST Address: 6550 Carothers Parkway Suite 100 Corporate Centre 9 Franklin TN 37067 Website: www.medhost.com Email: Craig.Badcock@medhost.com Phone: 615-761-2248 Developer/Vendor Contact: Craig Badcock Page 1 of 12

Part 2: ONC-Authorized Certification Body Information 2.1 ONC-Authorized Certification Body Information ONC-ACB Name: Drummond Group Address: 13359 North Hwy 183, Ste B-406-238, Austin, TX 78750 Website: Email: www.drummondgroup.com ehr@drummondgroup.com Phone: (512) 599-1817 ONC-ACB Contact: Jodi Gonzalez This test results summary is approved for public release by the following ONC-Authorized Certification Body Representative: Jodi Gonzalez ONC-ACB Authorized Representative Certification Body Manager Function/Title Signature and Date 10/11/2015 2.2 Gap Certification The following identifies criterion or criteria certified via gap certification 170.314 (a)(1) (a)(19) (d)(6) (h)(1) (a)(6) (a)(20) (d)(8) (h)(2) (a)(7) (b)(5)* (d)(9) (h)(3) (a)(17) (d)(1) (f)(1) (a)(18) (d)(5) (f)(7)** *Gap certification allowed for Inpatient setting only **Gap certification allowed for Ambulatory setting only x No gap certification Page 2 of 12

2.3 Inherited Certification The following identifies criterion or criteria certified via inherited certification 170.314 (a)(1) (a)(16) Inpt. only (c)(2) (f)(2) (a)(2) (a)(17) Inpt. only (c)(3) (f)(3) (a)(3) (a)(18) (d)(1) (f)(4) Inpt. only (a)(4) (a)(19) (d)(2) (a)(5) (a)(20) (d)(3) (a)(6) (b)(1) (d)(4) (a)(7) (b)(2) (d)(5) (a)(8) (b)(3) (d)(6) (f)(7) (a)(9) (b)(4) (d)(7) (g)(1) (a)(10) (b)(5) (d)(8) (g)(2) (a)(11) (b)(6) Inpt. only (d)(9) Optional (g)(3) (a)(12) (b)(7) (e)(1) (g)(4) (a)(13) (b)(8) (e)(2) Amb. only (h)(1) (a)(14) (b)(9) (e)(3) Amb. only (h)(2) (a)(15) (c)(1) (f)(1) (h)(3) x No inherited certification (f)(5) Amb. only (f)(6) Amb. only Page 3 of 12

Part 3: NVLAP-Accredited Testing Laboratory Information Report Number: SG-10022015-434 Test Date(s): 10/6/2015 3.1 NVLAP-Accredited Testing Laboratory Information ATL Name: Drummond Group EHR Test Lab Accreditation Number: NVLAP Lab Code 200979-0 Address: 13359 North Hwy 183, Ste B-406-238, Austin, TX 78750 Website: Email: www.drummondgroup.com ehr@drummondgroup.com Phone: 817-709-1627 ATL Contact: Kyle Meadors For more information on scope of accreditation, please reference NVLAP site. Part 3 of this test results summary is approved for public release by the following Accredited Testing Laboratory Representative: Sonia Galvan Test Proctor ATL Authorized Representative Function/Title Signature and Date 10/11/2015 Houston,TX Location Where Test Conducted 3.2 Test Information 3.2.1 Additional Software Relied Upon for Certification Additional Software Applicable Criteria Functionality provided by Additional Software x No additional software required Page 4 of 12

3.2.2 Test Tools Test Tool Version x Cypress 2.6 eprescribing Validation Tool 1.0.5 HL7 CDA Cancer Registry Reporting Validation Tool 1.0.3 HL7 v2 Electronic Laboratory Reporting (ELR) Validation Tool 1.8.2 HL7 v2 Immunization Information System (IIS) Reporting Validation Tool 1.8.2 HL7 v2 Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) Validation Tool 1.7.2 HL7 v2 Syndromic Surveillance Reporting Validation Tool 1.7.2 Transport Testing Tool 181 Direct Certificate Discovery Tool 3.0.4 Edge Testing Tool 0.0.5 No test tools required 3.2.3 Test Data Alteration (customization) to the test data was necessary and is described in Appendix [insert appendix letter] x No alteration (customization) to the test data was necessary 3.2.4 Standards 3.2.4.1 Multiple Standards Permitted The following identifies the standard(s) that has been successfully tested where more than one standard is permitted Criterion # (a)(8)(ii)(a)(2) (a)(13) 170.204(b)(1) HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: URL-Based Implementations of the Context-Aware Information Retrieval (Infobutton) Domain 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release Standard Successfully Tested 170.204(b)(2) HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: Context-Aware Knowledge Retrieval (Infobutton) Service-Oriented Architecture Implementation Guide 170.207(j) HL7 Version 3 Standard: Clinical Genomics; Pedigree Page 5 of 12

Criterion # (a)(15)(i) (a)(16)(ii) (b)(2)(i)(a) (b)(7)(i) (b)(8)(i) (e)(1)(i) 170.204(b)(1) HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: URL-Based Implementations of the Context-Aware Information Retrieval (Infobutton) Domain 170.210(g) Network Time Protocol Version 3 (RFC 1305) 170.207(i) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(c)(2) (ICD-10- CM) for the indicated conditions 170.207(i) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(c)(2) (ICD-10- CM) for the indicated conditions 170.207(i) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(c)(2) (ICD-10- CM) for the indicated conditions Standard Successfully Tested Annex A of the FIPS Publication 140-2 [list encryption and hashing algorithms] 170.204(b)(2) HL7 Version 3 Implementation Guide: Context-Aware Knowledge Retrieval (Infobutton) Service-Oriented Architecture Implementation Guide 170. 210(g) Network Time Protocol Version 4 (RFC 5905) 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release (e)(1)(ii)(a)(2) (e)(3)(ii) 170.210(g) Network Time Protocol Version 3 (RFC 1305) Annex A of the FIPS Publication 140-2 [list encryption and hashing algorithms] 170. 210(g) Network Time Protocol Version 4 (RFC 5905) Common MU Data Set (15) 170.207(a)(3) IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT March 2012 Release 170.207(b)(2) The code set specified at 45 CFR 162.1002(a)(5) (HCPCS and CPT-4) Page 6 of 12

Criterion # Standard Successfully Tested x None of the criteria and corresponding standards listed above are applicable 3.2.4.2 Newer Versions of Standards The following identifies the newer version of a minimum standard(s) that has been successfully tested Newer Version Applicable Criteria No newer version of a minimum standard was tested 3.2.5 Optional Functionality Criterion # (a)(4)(iii) (b)(1)(i)(b) (b)(1)(i)(c) (b)(2)(ii)(b) (b)(2)(ii)(c) (e)(1) (f)(3) (f)(7) Common MU Data Set (15) Common MU Data Set (15) Optional Functionality Successfully Tested Plot and display growth charts Receive summary care record using the standards specified at 170.202(a) and (b) (Direct and XDM Validation) Receive summary care record using the standards specified at 170.202(b) and (c) (SOAP Protocols) Transmit health information to a Third Party using the standards specified at 170.202(a) and (b) (Direct and XDM Validation) Transmit health information to a Third Party using the standards specified at 170.202(b) and (c) (SOAP Protocols) View, download and transmit data to a third party utilizing the Edge Protocol IG version 1.1 Ambulatory setting only Create syndrome-based public health surveillance information for transmission using the standard specified at 170.205(d)(3) (urgent care visit scenario) Ambulatory setting only transmission to public health agencies syndromic surveillance - Create Data Elements Express Procedures according to the standard specified at 170.207(b)(3) (45 CFR162.1002(a)(4): Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature) Express Procedures according to the standard specified at 170.207(b)(4) (45 CFR162.1002(c)(3): ICD-10-PCS) x No optional functionality tested Page 7 of 12

3.2.6 2014 Edition Certification Criteria* Successfully Tested Criteria # Version Version Criteria # TP** TD*** TP TD (a)(1) 1.3 1.5 x (c)(3) 1.11 1.11 (a)(2) 1.2 (d)(1) 1.2 (a)(3) 1.2 1.4 (d)(2) 1.6 (a)(4) 1.4 1.3 (d)(3) 1.3 (a)(5) 1.4 1.3 (d)(4) 1.3 (a)(6) 1.3 1.4 (d)(5) 1.2 (a)(7) 1.3 1.3 (d)(6) 1.2 (a)(8) 1.3 (d)(7) 1.2 (a)(9) 1.3 1.3 (d)(8) 1.2 (a)(10) 1.2 1.4 (d)(9) Optional 1.2 (a)(11) 1.3 (e)(1) 1.11 1.5 (a)(12) 1.3 (e)(2) Amb. only 1.2 1.6 (a)(13) 1.2 (e)(3) Amb. only 1.3 (a)(14) 1.2 (f)(1) 1.2 1.2 (a)(15) 1.5 (f)(2) 1.3 1.3 (a)(16) Inpt. only 1.3 1.2 (f)(3) 1.3 1.3 (a)(17) Inpt. only 1.2 (f)(4) Inpt. only 1.3 1.3 (a)(18) 1.1 1.5 (a)(19) 1.1 1.5 (a)(20) 1.1 1.5 (b)(1) 1.7 1.4 (f)(5) Amb. only 1.2 1.2 (f)(6) Amb. only 1.4 1.4 (b)(2) 1.4 1.6 (f)(7) Amb. only 1.1 (b)(3) 1.4 1.4 (g)(1) 2.0 2.0 (b)(4) 1.3 1.4 x (g)(2) 2.0 2.0 (b)(5) 1.4 1.2 (g)(3) 1.4 (b)(6) Inpt. only 1.3 1.3 x (g)(4) 1.2 (b)(7) 1.4 1.7 (h)(1) 1.1 (b)(8) 1.2 1.2 (h)(2) 1.1 (b)(9) 1.1 1.1 (h)(3) 1.1 x (c)(1) 1.11 1.11 x (c)(2) 1.11 1.11 Page 8 of 12

Criteria # No criteria tested Version Version Criteria # TP** TD*** TP TD *For a list of the 2014 Edition Certification Criteria, please reference http://www.healthit.gov/certification (navigation: 2014 Edition Test Method) **Indicates the version number for the Test Procedure (TP) ***Indicates the version number for the Test Data (TD) Page 9 of 12

3.2.7 2014 Clinical Quality Measures* Type of Clinical Quality Measures Successfully Tested: x Ambulatory Inpatient No CQMs tested *For a list of the 2014 Clinical Quality Measures, please the CMS ecqm Library (Navigation: June 2014 and April 2014 Updates) Ambulatory CQMs CMS ID Version CMS ID Version CMS ID Version CMS ID Version 2 90 136 155 22 117 137 156 50 122 138 157 52 123 139 158 56 124 140 159 61 125 141 160 62 126 142 161 64 127 143 163 65 128 144 164 66 129 145 165 68 130 146 166 69 131 147 167 74 132 148 169 75 133 149 177 77 134 153 179 82 135 154 182 Inpatient CQMs CMS ID Version CMS ID Version CMS ID Version CMS ID Version x 9 v3 x 71 v4 x 107 v3 x 172 v4 x 26 v2 x 72 v3 x 108 v3 x 178 v4 x 30 v4 x 73 v3 x 109 v3 x 185 v3 x 31 v3 x 91 v4 x 110 v3 x 188 v4 x 32 v4 x 100 v3 x 111 v3 x 190 v3 x 53 v3 x 102 v3 x 113 v3 x 55 v3 x 104 v3 x 114 v3 x 60 v3 x 105 v3 x 171 v4 Page 10 of 12

3.2.8 Automated Numerator Recording and Measure Calculation 3.2.8.1 Automated Numerator Recording Automated Numerator Recording Successfully Tested (a)(1) (a)(11) (a)(18) (b)(6) (a)(3) (a)(12) (a)(19) (b)(8) (a)(4) (a)(13) (a)(20) (b)(9) (a)(5) (a)(14) (b)(2) (e)(1) (a)(6) (a)(15) (b)(3) (e)(2) (a)(7) (a)(16) (b)(4) (e)(3) (a)(9) (a)(17) (b)(5) x Automated Numerator Recording was not tested 3.2.8.2 Automated Measure Calculation Automated Measure Calculation Successfully Tested (a)(1) (a)(11) (a)(18) (b)(6) (a)(3) (a)(12) (a)(19) (b)(8) (a)(4) (a)(13) (a)(20) (b)(9) (a)(5) (a)(14) (b)(2) (e)(1) (a)(6) (a)(15) (b)(3) (e)(2) (a)(7) (a)(16) (b)(4) (e)(3) (a)(9) (a)(17) (b)(5) x Automated Measure Calculation was not tested 3.2.9 Attestation Attestation Forms (as applicable) Safety-Enhanced Design* x Quality Management System** Appendix A B 3.3 Appendices Attached below. Privacy and Security *Required if any of the following were tested: (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(16), (a)(18), (a)(19), (a)(20), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(9). **Required for every EHR product C Page 11 of 12

Test Results Summary Change History Test Report ID Description of Change Date 2014 Edition Test Report Summary Page 12 of 12

ST ~ MEDHOST, Inc. 6550 Carothers Parkway, Suite 100 Franklin, TN 37067 www.medhost.com 615.761.1000 August 18, 2015 To whom it may concern, MEDHOST, Inc. uses a single, standard Quality Management System (QMS) in the development, testing, implementation and maintenance for its Business Intelligence (BI). module which is certified as both an Inpatient and Ambulatory Modular EHR in the 2014 Edition of meaningful use. MEDHOST software development is compliant to 21 CFR 820 with 2 exceptions. Our product for the Automated Threshold Calculations and Clinical Quality Measures criteria of the 2014 Edition of Meaningful Use is called Business Intelligence. BI is part ofthe product line which is offered through MEDHOST. Development, testing, implementation and maintenance of PL BI followed the HMS QMS defined below. This certification is for our Modular Inpatient Certification of Business Intelligence v4.0. Development, testing, implementation and maintenance of all criteria for which certification to the 2014 Edition of meaningful use follows the guidelines set forth in the 'Scope' statement of the Quality Management System Manual is presented below: Scope MEDHOST's Quality Management System was created in compliance to the Food and Drug Administration's Code offederal Regulations Title 21 Part 820 Quality System Regulation. MEDHOST applies this Quality Management System to its Electronic Health Record (EHR). Food and Drug Administration Code offederal Regulations Title 21 Parts 803, 806, and 821 are also incorporated in our Quality System, as applicable, for our medical device products. The QA Manual has two (2) exceptions to the 21 CFR 820 process for our EHR development that is separate from that required for our Class 2 Medical Device software. 1. Our Medical Device software complies with all CAP A requirements of 21 CFR 820 while the rest of our EHR software complies with the CAP A requirements for Processes only. 2. Design Risk Analysis is conducted for our EHR software and Medical device products, but only is documented on the Risk Analysis tool for our Medical Device software. Sincerely, ~ Missy Willoughb:!6~ Director of Meaningful Use and FDA Compliance