Incompetent or Negligent?



Similar documents
LEGAL ASPECTS OF CREWS & CREWING James Trumble 5 Essex Court

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HAGUE-VISBY RULES, THE HAMBURG RULES AND THE ROTTERDAM RULES

The distinction between crew negligence and crew incompetence and the consequence thereof.

Scandinavian Maritime Law

Reform of Japanese Maritime Law

Piracy Does it give rise to a claim for General Average?

MARINE INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR NEGLIGENCE

A Contribution to the Analysis of Maritime Accidents with Catastrophic Consequence

Multimodal Transport Operator s Liability Insurance Policy

INTER-CLUB NEW YORK PRODUCE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 1996 (AS AMENDED SEPTEMBER 2011)

Law of Maritime Salvage. An Overview

INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A)

Transport insurance Guide

Carriage of goods. Lectures by: Researcher Dr. Ellen Eftestøl-Wilhelmsson. Det juridiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo

Marine Insurance Aspects of Ship Financing

United States Admiralty Law

COMPARISON OF HAGUE-VISBY AND HAMBURG RULES

Standard Conditions (1992) governing the FIATA MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT BILL OF LADING

IFSMA Paper. As a result of the paper the delegates supported a resolution which is printed below.

"the Company" - means Spliethoff Transport B.V. and/or subsidiaries and/or associated companies.

THE CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS WHOLLY OR PARTLY BY SEA (THE ROTTERDAM RULES )

53 RD ANNUAL CONGRESS IN LONDON 2-5 SEPTEMBER 2015 MARINE INSURANCE DENYING COVER AS A MARINE INSURER: PLAIN SAILING OR DEAD IN THE WATER?

International Safety Management Code

DUBLIN CAYMAN ISLANDS NEW YORK TOKYO HONG KONG

Company means Jupiter Global Ltd., a member of the Hong Kong Association of Freight Forwarding and Logistics Limited trading under these Conditions.

General Terms and Conditions

NEU Parcel Solutions Terms and Conditions of Service Effective: May 18, 2016

SEAFARER SUBJECT GUIDE

INTERNATIONAL SALVAGE UNION SUB CONTRACT LUMPSUM AGREEMENT "S A L V C O N " GUIDANCE NOTES

AIMU FPA and WA CARGO CLAUSES (1/1/2004) COMPARED WITH THE LONDON INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (B) and (C) (1/1/2009)

CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language. CALIFORNIA Intermediate Indemnity Language

MASTER OF LAWS: LLM, MARITIME LAW BROAD OUTLINE OF THE COURSEWORK STRUCTURED MASTER S PROGRAMME

LAWS RELATED TO MARINE INSURANCE AND INCOME TAX PROVISIONS RELATED TO INSURANCE

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE. Deck: Personnel Management and Ship Masters Business (Fishing)

THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE. Read the instructions on page 3 carefully before answering any questions.

Household Goods & Personal Effects Proposal Form B (iii) Insurance of Personal Effects in Barrels

TO: CONSIGNEE NAME C/O ADDRESS SHOW SITE SKID EXHIBITION PARAPHERNALIA (STC CTNS) (154630) ROLL EXHIBIT MATERIAL/CARPET (COLOR ) (154630)

The passage through the Northern Sea Route: the cases decided in Russian courts

SERVICE AND COMPETENCE YOU CAN RELY ON P&I AND FD&D AND TRADERS CHARTERERS

Unit-2- Marine Insurance

The Importance of Class in Marine Insurance, Claims, and Legal Liabilities

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CARGO LIABILITY STUDY

Weekly update. A Clyde & Co case on the applicable law of an arbitration agreement in an insurance policy. Sealion Shipping v Valiant

Compensation Claims. Contents

Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court of the Republic of Sri Lanka

Commercial lines policies are distinctly different from personal lines insurance [homeowner s and personal auto] in the following ways:

Dealing with the challenges of business disputes and effectively resolving them Part 1: Debt Recovery

GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR CONTRACTS OF SERVICES WITH TRANSPORT OPERATORS

Examiners will give higher marks where evidence of wider reading /deeper understanding is demonstrated.

PERSONAL INJURIES AND DEATHS MALTA

CAN COMPANY STRATEGIES ENHANCE COMPETENCE? by Capt. Pradeep Chawla Managing Director QHSE & Training Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd.

Table Of Contents I. INTRODUCTION II. THE IMO: CREATOR OF THE CODE III. ORIGINS OF THE ISM CODE IV. PROVISIONS OF THE ISM CODE. A.

A reckless disregard for the safety of property and/or human life.

Notice to all Shipowners, Employers, Ship masters and Seafarers. This notice should be read with in conjunction with MSN 1822 (M )& MSN1767

far more common case where concern for human safety has dictated the abandonment of the vessel, rights of ownership remain.

Maritime Injury Cases

A. The vessel owner has appointed Solstice Sailing, Inc. as agent to manage and charter the yacht identified in the below as:

Pilot on the Bridge Role, Authority and Responsibility. Necessity of Bridge Team Management.

PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002

INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A)

INTRODUCTORY COMMENT

Presentation by. Nigel Carden (UK P&I Club) Chairman, IGP&I Maritime Security Subcommittee

Unit 2. Maritime Law

Scope Definitions. Article 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 99B 1

Marine Insurance Law in Korea

MERCHANT SHIPPING (LIMITATION OF SHIPOWNERS LIABILITY) (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE 2005

TRANSLATION CONDITIONS DUTCH BOURSE CARGO POLICY 2006

Marine Insurance Claims in the Coming Millennium The Consulting Surveyor s Point of View

B 4815 Suppliment tal-gazzetta tal-gvern ta Malta, Nru. 17,506, 21 ta Novembru, 2003 Taqsima B MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT (CAP. 234)

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FLAG STATE DUTIES AS LAID DOWN UNDER ARTICLE 94 OF UNCLOS

SCHEDULE: TERMS OF AGREEMENT

LIABILITIES AND REMEDIES OF BOAT DEALERS, BROKERS AND REPAIRERS

Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea

New Zealand Port and Harbour Marine Safety Code. Maritime Safety MARITIME SAFETY AUTHORITY OF NEW ZEALAND Kia Maanu Kia Ora FINAL CODE

DEMISE CHARTER AGREEMENT Bare Boat Charter

The Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS

THE CARRIER'S LIABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS

THE FOLLOWING ARE INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE FRONT SIDE OF SEAGATE PURCHASE ORDERS:

F S MACKENZIE GROUP LIMITED CONDITIONS OF SUB-CONTRACTING FOR ROAD HAULAGE

Pantaenius Yacht Third Party Liability Clauses

MARINE INSURANCE ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

BROKER/SHIPPER TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

MARINE INSURANCE. F.O.R. (Free on Rail) This is same as F.O.B. but it concerns mainly the internal trade transactions.

COMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos?

MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY) MERCHANT SHIPPING (MARITIME CLAIMS LIMITATIONOF LIABILITY) CHAPTER 281

Freight Link Ltd P.O. Box Botany, Manukau, 2163 Phone: (09) Fax: (09)

BROKER/CO-BROKER INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT

MARINE INSURANCE GUIDELINES

The ISPS Code as a component of onboard resources in Bayesian Analysis.

FIATA Position on the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods wholly or partly by Sea (the Rotterdam Rules ).

MARINE INSURANCE ACT CHAPTER 390 CAP Marine Insurance LAWS OF KENYA

Galleon Marine Insurance Agency 37/39 Lime Street, London, EC3M 7AY United Kingdom +44 (0)

Transcription:

1 Incompetent or Negligent? Ian MacLean MBA MNI Senior Associate/Master Mariner 2 1

3 Negligence or Incompetence? Incompetence Claims Incompetence as a cause of action The Seaworthiness claims What is seaworthiness? Your crew negligent or incompetent? > The question > Applying the law Preventing / defending incompetence claims 4 2

Negligence vs. Incompetence Is there a difference? Does it matter? What are the key issues? How do I prove competence? But he s got a certificate of competency! 5 The Claims Why would cargo interests allege unseaworthiness? Salvage General Average Physical damage to cargo Losses arising from delay in delivery of cargo. 6 3

What is Seaworthiness - I? Implied Obligation: fit to meet and undergo the perils of the sea and other incidental risks to which of necessity she must be exposed in the course of the voyage. Kopitoff v Wilson (1876) 7 Seaworthiness: What is Seaworthiness - II? The ship must have that degree of fitness which an ordinary careful owner would require his vessel to have at the commencement of her voyage having regard to all the probable circumstances of it. Would a prudent owner have required that it (the defect) be made good before sending his ship to sea, had he known of it? F. C. Bradley v Federal Steam Navigation Co. [1926] 8 4

Case Study - The Torepo Loaded tanker Grounded South America - 1997 No pollution/loss of cargo Salvage services required Cargo interests paid their portion of salvage Cargo interests claimed damages. 9 The Grounding Pilot on board Master resting in cabin Chief Officer on bridge Alter course position approaching Pilot transferring chart positions Discrepancy/distraction Chief Officer took no action Controlled grounding!!! 10 5

Court s assessment of Chief Officer Not monitoring V/L progress before turn Assumed pilot delaying turn Knowledge of area Currents Faith in efficiency of pilot Chief Officer Negligent, or Incompetent? 11 Who Pays for Loss? See the contract of carriage! Division of responsibilities, liabilities, rights & immunities 12 6

The Contract of Carriage 1800s Carrier had strict liability to transport cargo safely Subject to the common law exceptions Act of God Public enemies, and, Inherent vice. However - freedom of contract applied Adoption by carriers of extensive exclusion clauses Introduction of consignee protecting legislation Multiple legislation - too fragmented. 13 The Carriage Conventions Hague (1921) & Hague Visby (1977) Rules Incorporated into B/L can t contract out Seaworthiness obligation carrier bound: Before and at beginning of voyage To exercise due diligence To make V/L seaworthy (Includes competent crew) Health Warning: - Obligation non-delegable. 14 7

The Negligence Defence Providing seaworthiness obligation complied with, neither carrier or ship, is responsible for loss / damage which: Arises or results from: The act, neglect or default, of Master, crew, pilot & the servants of carrier, in navigation or management of ship Health Warning: - Defence does not apply to management of cargo. 15 What is Incompetence? Inherent lack of ability Lack of adequate training or instruction Lack of knowledge of ship/systems Disinclination to perform job properly Physical/mental disability or incapacity Health Warning: - This is not an exhaustive list 16 8

Negligence Fine line between negligence/incompetence Negligence is the failure: on a particular occasion, to meet required standard of care Torepo - Steel J. s Question Negligent navigation by competent officer, or Negligent navigation by incompetent officer? 17 Negligence or Incompetence? 18 9

Incompetence The Defence Issues Objective : Demonstrate to opponent litigation is pointless Negotiate settlement The key issues: Pro-actively manage evidence collection Must be Causal Link. Respond to OCIMF / PSC reports Avoid exception reporting mentality Seaworthiness obligation non-delegable 19 Defending Against Incompetence Recruitment Skill, knowledge, experience Training Office based / pre-departure Soft systems Induction to SMS Hard systems Shipboard equipment Monitor commitment, attitude, motivation Identify and provide training / education All ship visitors have a responsibility Appraisal section in visit reports / records Record, record, and record again Above all: Record the Good Stuff! 20 10

Summary STCW Certificate does not = competence Be alive to the issue of seaworthiness Understand the defences i.e. negligence Create paper trail of competence Manage creation of post incident documents Early evidence collection by lawyer Expert survey of damage treat like crime scene The Ince E-Brief. 21 Does your paper trail evidence the exercise of due diligence to ensure competent crew? 22 11

12