American Association for Laboratory Accreditation



Similar documents
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

ISO and SANAS guidelines for use of reference materials and PT scheme participation Shadrack Phophi

The Facts on Equine Drug Testing

1. PURPOSE To provide a written procedure for laboratory proficiency testing requirements and reporting.

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

OIML D 18 DOCUMENT. Edition 2008 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING REGULATIONS

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR LABORATORIES

R221 - Specific Requirements: Forensic

POLICY TITLE: Employee Drug and Alcohol Testing POLICY NO: PAGE 1 of 7

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN VETERINARY TESTING LABORATORIES

R103 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: PROFICIENCY TESTING FOR ISO/IEC LABORATORIES

Volume 22 Number 22. C43-A ISBN ISSN Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Confirmation of Drugs; Approved Guideline

NIST HANDBOOK CHECKLIST CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING

Asset Management Systems Scheme (AMS Scheme)

QUALITY MANUAL GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. October 2008 Revision 08

Gap Analysis of ISO 15189:2012 and ISO 15189:2007 in the field of Medical Testing

ALACC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Quality Management System Policy Manual

HOMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ATHLETE POLICY ON TESTING FOR ALCOHOL AND ILLEGAL OR PERFORMANCE ENHANCING DRUGS

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 2015

There is a need for a coordinating role by the Commission supported by the Framework programme, to facilitate and harmonise those developments.

OPERATIONAL STANDARD

State Meat and Poultry Inspection (MPI) Program Laboratory Quality Management System Checklist

NALCOR ENERGY ALCOHOL AND DRUG PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTORS

Methods verification. Transfer of validated methods into laboratories working routine. Dr. Manuela Schulze 1

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ACTIVE CONSTITUENT, AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICAL PRODUCTS.

ISO 9001: 2008 Boosting quality to differentiate yourself from the competition. xxxx November 2008

Specialty Guidelines for the Delivery of Services by Industrial/Organizational Psychologists

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

ISO/TC 34/SC17 'Management systems for food safety' FAQ

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

IAS CALIBRATION and TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS DEFINITIONS

EA IAF/ILAC Guidance. on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998

NOTICE. Re: GD210: ISO 13485:2003 Quality Management System Audits Performed by Health Canada Recognized Registrars

Supplier Quality Assurance

Standards for Laboratory Accreditation

RULES FOR THE PARTICIPATION IN INTER- LABORATORY COMPARISONS AND PROFICIENCY TESTING SCHEMES

2014 Annual Report on Inspections of Establishments

Guidelines on the Reporting of Compliance with Specification

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD

How To Ensure Quality Assurance

EffiValidation 3.0 software basic training module

Pre-Employment Screening and Inprocessing of New Employees

General. What is a laboratory test? What is a waived test?

NABL NATIONAL ACCREDITATION

THERMAL INSULATION MATERIALS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview

Guidance for accreditation of EN 15224:2012 Health care services Quality management systems Requirements based on EN ISO 9001:2008

International Commission on Trichinellosis (ICT) Recommendations for Quality Assurance in Digestion Testing Programs for Trichinella.

Frank Zanzuccki, Executive Director. See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement

MEDICAL DEVICE GUIDANCE

FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FSSC 22000

ISO/IEC QUALITY MANUAL

MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR LABORATORIES AND INSPECTION BODIES

FDA STAFF MANUAL GUIDES, VOLUME I - ORGANIZATIONS AND FUNCTIONS FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF GLOBAL AND REGULATORY OPERATIONS AND POLICY

Overview of ISO for 'Biologicals'

Employee Substance Abuse

CRM s and the Dilemma of the 2nd Source. Shawn Kassner, Sr Product Manager Tim Miller, Sr Organic Chemist Phenova, A Phenomenex Company

Procedure for Equipment Calibration and Maintenance

Guide for Registration of Gaming Machine. I General Provisions

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED TO PRODUCE QUALITY DATA

Comparison Chart of FDA and EPA Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Regulations and the OECD Principles of GLP

TG TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC :2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

Medical Cannabis Laboratory Approval Program

CONFORMITY MARKINGING FOR THE GCC COUNTRIES. Issue No.: (5) Date: (2/21/2008) Committee Draft No. 5

Correspondence between ISO 13485:2003 and the US Quality System Regulation

SASKATCHEWAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACISTS Electronic Transmission of Prescriptions. Policy Statement and Guidelines for Pharmacists

Annex 1 WHO good practices for pharmaceutical quality control laboratories

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Guide to Method Validation for Quantitative Analysis in Chemical Testing Laboratories

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

Non-Controlled Copy. Quality Manual Revision Log. Rev # Date Description

TITLE: Quality System Manual DOCUMENT NUMBER: QMS

CRITERIA FOR PERFORMING CALIBRATION AND INTERMEDIATE CHECKS ON EQUIPMENT USED IN ACCREDITED FACILITIES

Guidance for Industry Time and Extent Applications for Nonprescription Drug Products

R 3160 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

URINE DRUG TESTING. Effective December 1 st, 2012

R101 - General. Requirements: Accreditation of. ISO/IEC Laboratories

LAB 37 Edition 3 June 2013

MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY DRUG FREE WORKPLACE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY

A commitment to quality and continuous improvement

How DCMA Helps To Ensure Good Measurements

Regulation and Risk Management of Combination Products

Guidelines for the Accreditation of Information Technology Security Evaluation and Testing Facilities

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROGRAMME OF REFERENCE MATERIAL CERTIFICATION IN SERIAL PRODUCTION

Eagle Machining, Inc. Quality Management System

AEROSPACE STANDARD. Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations RATIONALE

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS RECEIPT OF DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY

Document Reference APMG 15/015

14 December 2006 GUIDELINES ON OUTSOURCING

I. Objectives. Justification for clinical education

IMPLEMENTATION SUGGESTIONS

Transcription:

Page 1 of 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION These accreditation requirements are applicable to the special competition animal drug testing laboratory accreditation program. This program is designed to meet the requirements of the Association of Official Racing Chemists (AORC), which requires ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditation as well as participation in applicable Proficiency Testing Programs as described in this document. Internationally accepted accreditation criteria and individual user requirements form the basis for the requirements of this program. One of the major objectives of this program is to provide those responsible for using or approving competition animal drug testing laboratories with an effective alternative to their own action of evaluating and recognizing qualified laboratories. A thorough and balanced assessment is provided, as individual requirements are coordinated with A2LA requirements in other areas to provide overall accreditation of a laboratory with a minimum disruption to laboratory operations. A2LA is committed to working with government and non-government users, and Racing and Gaming Authorities, Associations, and Commissions to provide accreditation over an appropriate scope to realize this objective. The scope of this program covers screening and confirmatory methodologies, including immunoassay, chromatographic and spectrometric techniques, for the qualitative and quantitative detection and identification of prohibited substances, and their metabolites, and derivatives thereof under state or regulatory authorities. The sample collection and laboratory analyses shall include, but not be limited to, the matrices of animal fluids, tissue, and other biological materials and associated pharmaceutical preparations and paraphernalia. Applications for accreditation may be made for one or more specific testing technologies, matrices and substances. 2.0 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Competition Animal Drug Testing Laboratory (herein known as laboratory): A facility that performs tests on body fluids, tissue, and other biological materials from an animal, or associated pharmaceutical preparations and paraphernalia for the detection and identification of drug-related analytes. 2.2 Drug: A substance, which may prevent or cure disease or otherwise enhance the physical or mental welfare and/or performance of the tested animal. 2.3 Test: An analytical process carried out according to a specified procedure that allows for the detection and/or identification of one or more analytes of interest on a sample. 2.4 Foreign Substance: All substances except those which exist naturally in the untreated animal at normal physiological levels; and substances or metabolites thereof which are contained in animal feeds or feed supplements and/or chemotherapeutic agents; or pharmaceutical aids. 2.5 Prohibited substance: Any substance defined as prohibited by the client. 2.6 AORC: Association of Official Racing Chemists.

Page 2 of 6 2.7 IITP: Iowa State University's International Interlaboratory Testing Program. 2.8 CPMA: Canadian Pari-Mutuel Agency 2.9 TIP: Testing Integrity Program, administered by University of California- Davis. 2.10 Quality Manual: A manual that describes a laboratory's quality system, including its policies and practices for quality assurance and quality control. Detailed procedures may be contained in other documentation cited by the quality manual. 2.11 Quality Assurance: A system by which a laboratory monitors technical and non-technical functions to ensure the quality of testing. 2.12 Quality Control: Mechanisms designed to ensure that any test result produced by a test method or instrument is valid and acceptable. 2.13 Reference Material: A chemical available from a commercial source or a synthetic sample which has chromatographic and spectral characteristics in conformity with non-controversial published data or which has been validated by comparison with a certified reference material. This material may also be an isolate from an authenticated drug-administered urine or blood, providing the analytical data available is sufficient to fully justify its identity as a metabolite of the drug in question. 2.14 Certified Reference Material: A reference material one or more of whose property values are certified by a technically valid procedure, accompanied by or traceable to a certificate or other documentation which is issued by a certifying body (such national or international institutes or certifying bodies of an equivalent status (such as U.S. Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, World Health Organization and other pharmaceutical authorities) and are acceptable after a simple identity check. 2.15 Traceability: A property of a result of a determination that can be related to appropriate standards through an unbroken chain of comparisons. 2.16 Proficiency Testing: Determination of the laboratory testing performance by means of interlaboratory comparisons. 2.17 Client: Individuals or groups requiring services from a competition animal drug testing laboratory, such as but not limited to equine practitioners, racing or gaming commissions, show associations, fair associations, regulatory agencies and trainers. 2.18 ISO: International Organization for Standardization.

Page 3 of 6 2.19 Blind sample testing: A system for periodically sending laboratories for testing a set of samples whose values for the concentrations and/or presence of analytes are known to the program administrator but not known in advance of testing to the participating laboratories. 3.0 GENERAL AND SPECIFIC CRITERIA The general criteria for accreditation are contained in ISO/IEC 17025-2005, General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories. All provisions of the general criteria, and the additions noted below shall apply under this program. Specific criteria are an elaboration on or interpretation of the general criteria plus those requirements of accreditation applicable to a certain field of testing, testing technology, type of test, or specific test. These specific criteria normally come from other standards or documents that apply to special areas and that have been recommended for inclusion in specific programs by appropriate technical committees. 1 Additional specific requirements for this program approved by the A2LA Criteria Council are described below. The numbering system for each section below corresponds to the major sections of ISO/IEC 17025-2005. 4.0 Management requirements 4.1.5.b) A.1 unless otherwise prohibited, contractual conflict of interest agreements shall be established along with appropriate training programs for entry personnel. All affected staff members shall have annual reviews and note that they understand the conflict of interest agreement and will adhere to the requirements. 4.2 4.15 No additions 5.0 Technical requirements 5.1 General No additions. 5.2 Personnel No additions. 5.3 Accommodation and environmental conditions No additions. 5.4 Test and calibration methods and method validation 5.4 A.1 The laboratory shall employ documented instructions on the handling and preparation of samples for testing, performance of all test procedures, and the use and operation of all relevant equipment and instruments. All instructions, manuals and reference data relevant to the work of the laboratory shall be maintained current and be readily available to the staff and shall include: 1. Chemists Advisory Committee of the Association of Racing Commissioners International Quality Assurance Committee.

Page 4 of 6 5.4 A.1.1 clear, unambiguous instructions for equipment or instrument operation and method performance; 5.4 A.1.2 dates of adoption of instructions and dates of technical changes; 5.4 A.1.3 data on repeatability and reproducibility of methods as appropriate; and 5.4 A.1.4 identification of any known limitations of methods, such as applicable concentration ranges and possible interferences as appropriate. 5.4 A.2 The laboratory shall: 5.4 A.2.1 have an initial screening procedure for prohibited substances that specifies the minimum schedule of tests for samples before they can be reported as negative; 5.4 A.2.2 document for each screening test how it decides which samples to follow up; 5.4 A.2.3 determine and document the limit of detection for representative analytes for each quantitative method used; and 5.4 A.2.4 check all data including those for negative results. 5.5 Equipment 5.5 A.1 The laboratory shall comply with local regulations covering the storage and handling of controlled substances. 5.6 Measurement traceability See P113 - A2LA Policy on Measurement Traceability for Life Sciences Testing Laboratories 5.7 Sampling No additions. 5.8 Handling of test and calibration items No additions. 5.9 Assuring the quality of tests and calibration results 5.9 A.1 The laboratory shall have measures to ensure that incidences of "false-negative" and "false-positive" results are kept to a minimum including: 5.9 A.1.1 blind submission of spiked samples or known positive and negative samples into the analytical system;

Page 5 of 6 5.9 A.1.2 participation in proficiency and blind sample testing from any of the following testing programs: The Association of Official Racing Chemists (AORC), The Iowa State University's International Interlaboratory Testing Program (IITP), the Canadian Pari- Mutuel Agency (CPMA) and the Testing Integrity Program (TIP), administered by the University of California-Davis. 5.10 Reporting the results 5.10 A.1 Each report shall contain at least the information required in the following clauses of ISO/IEC 17025, including that which is required by the client: 5.10.2 a), b), d), f), g), i), j). 5.10 A.2 In addition, each report shall contain the following information: 5.10 A.2.1 Unique identification of every included page of the report (e.g., page 1 of 2, page 2 of 2); 5.10 A.2.2 Sample identification or client number; 5.10 A.2.3 Along with the signature and title of person authorized to issue the report, and the date of authorization. PROFICIENCY AND BLIND SAMPLE TESTING Please refer to A2LA s R103 General Requirements: Proficiency Testing for ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratories and the associated R103a Annex, in addition to the applicable requirements identified in section 5.9 of the specific criteria document, for the proficiency testing requirements applicable to this program. Applicants under this program are required to participate in the proficiency and blind sample testing from any of the following proficiency testing programs: The Association of Official Racing Chemists (AORC) Iowa State University's International Interlaboratory Testing Program (IITP) Canadian Pari-Mutuel Agency (CPMA) Veterinary Drug Laboratory, University of California-Davis Testing Integrity Program (TIP) The laboratory shall provide the proficiency testing provider with written permission to release the laboratory's results under this program directly to A2LA for the sole purpose of its use in monitoring the laboratory's performance and compliance with accreditation requirements. If a laboratory's results are deemed outliers or unacceptable, then the laboratory shall investigate and determine the cause(s) for such unacceptable results, correct any problems identified, and report to A2LA the outcome of such investigations within 30 days.

Page 6 of 6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to the requirements described above, Competition Animal Drug Testing Laboratories are required to meet the requirements as defined by A2LA in such documents as P101 Rules for Making Reference to A2LA Accredited Status, P113 - A2LA Policy on Measurement Traceability for Life Sciences Testing Laboratories and other organizational requirements as appropriate. Document Revision History Date Description Added updated A2LA header. Added reference to other A2LA policy documents (throughout the document). Added clarification that these requirements are for competition animals and are meant to meet the requirements of AORC while maintaining commitment to work with other authorities (Section 1.01 and throughout the document). Updated Proficiency Testing Providers listed in Section 1.0, 2.0, and 5.9 and referenced A2LA s Proficiency Testing Requirements. Added A2LA s commitment to work with Racing Authorities and Associations in Section 1.0. Added clarification about prohibited substances in Section 1.0. Added clarification that testing can be performed on biological materials in Section 1.0 and 2.0. Clarified the types of possible clients in Section 2.17. Noted that additional requirements are approved by the A2LA Criteria Council in Section 3.0. Added clause 4.1.5.b) A.1 (inadvertently left off previous draft). Clarified that limits of detection be established for quantitative methods in Section 5.4 A.2.3. Clarified the listed clauses are from ISO/IEC 17025:2005 clauses in Section 5.10 A.1. Added requirement for reports to include the title of authorizing personnel in Section 5.10 A.2.3.. Changed references to A2LA Traceability Policy to Life Sciences Traceability Policy (throughout the document). 2013 by A2LA All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of A2LA.