CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD



Similar documents
GUIDELINE HOURLY RATES:

Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA)

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER No. 689

Conditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].

APIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from ,

DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS AND CONTINGENCY FEES. Colm Barry

The New CFA and DBA Regime. Simon Edwards

Short Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from

Damages Based Agreements: The Basics

Preamble HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS OF THE EL/PL PORTAL 05/04/2013

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE

Challenges to Solicitors charges in the post Jackson era

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

THE JACKSON REFORMS. Lord Justice Jackson s review of Civil litigation costs and the impact on insurers. Nicola Billen. The Jackson Reforms

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

Pre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents

professional negligence:

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

GUIDE TO NEW COSTS IN CIVIL CASE RULES GOVERNMENT REFORMS

DBA Regulations. My understanding of the decisions that have been made and questions that may arise are:

The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District. Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick

Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond!

1.2 Analyse matters to be considered by the judge when awarding damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper

making a road traffic accident claim

making a personal injury compensation claim

BEFORE-THE-EVENT INSURANCE

Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents

Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013

The online decision support tool for personal injury claims handling

The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director

No win no fee: our proposition after Jackson

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation

1.2 Analyse matters to be considered by the judge when awarding damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity

The new Practice Directions and amendments to the existing Practice Directions, and the new Pre-Action Protocols come into force as follows

Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales

Personal Injury Litigation after APRIL Cambridge Medico-legal society

Impact Assessment (IA)

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

QBE European Operations. Portal extension. Guidance document June Ministry of Justice extension to the claims protocols Maximising Opportunities

Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton

Bar Council and the Personal Injuries Bar Association response to the Extension of the RTA Portal PA Scheme consultation paper

MOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012

LASPO. Why has. come about brief history of reforms

BC Legal Update. Extending the RTA Portal to Disease claims. May Introduction

How To Settle A Claim For Damages From A Car Accident In The Uk

Study into average civil compensation in mesothelioma cases

Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims

Conditional Fee Agreements: best practice. no win - no fee - limiting the cost of claims to taxpayers

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS

FIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part

Pre-action Conduct of Litigation

Solvency Standard for Captive Insurers Transacting Non-life Insurance Business 2014

EWART PRICE SOLICITORS ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS - NOTES FOR CLAIMING FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND OTHER UNINSURED LOSSES

NOTES on Funding Your Claim

Frequently asked. questions. Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents. Stage 2. Medical Reports

Civil Litigation Reforms. March 2013

Key aspects of the Jackson review and related reforms - progress update as at 3 rd September 2012

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers March 2014

1.4. We specifically draw your attention to section 16 which sets out the scope of our liability.

The new Pre-Action Protocol for fast track Employers Liability and Public Liability Personal Injury Claims

Summary of the Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence Claims Market in England and Wales July 2015

1.3 Analyse the roles of the key participants in a PI case

briefing Guide to litigation funding

GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM

Your Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim

Mandate for Society/Club/Association

FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE PRE CONSULTATION RESPONSE BY. Action against Medical Accidents

Personal Injury /Clinical Negligence After-The-Event Insurance Proposal Form

scrutiny: Essential Guide to CRU Benefits and Appeals

ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT. Client Information Pack

Jackson, Costs & Funding:

Clinical Negligence. Issue of proceedings through to Trial

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012

Motoring Legal Solutions

CLAIMSadvisor. Employers & Public Liability Claims Jackson Reforms update. Background. Key changes post 1 April 2013

Pankhurst v White and MIB grotesque fee arrangements both sides paid the cost

1.3 Analyse the roles of the key participants in a PI case

Nick Pargeter Partner, BLM

Law & Practice : The UK Perspective. Vilnius, 22 nd October 2010

The Litigation Advantage Scheme

Setting Up Fee Charging Services

Transcription:

Quality without compromise 79 Marlowes Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire HP1 1LF England PO Box 764 Wellington 7654 Western Cape South Africa In association with van Wyk Fouchee Incorporated Cape Town South Africa www.underwoods-solicitors.co.uk CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD See Kerry s blog at: kerryunderwood.wordpress.com Underwoods Solicitors is a trading name of Law Abroad plc Registered in England: Number 3384650 Registered Office: 79 Marlowes, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP1 1LF PO Box 764, Wellington 7654, Western Cape, Republic of South Africa A list of directors is open to inspection at the registered office Freephone 0800 298 4 298 info@lawabroad.co.uk Authorized and regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 522884

2 Form 1 CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD (References are to The Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013) CLIENT: PART ONE COSTS (ALL FIGURES INCLUSIVE OF VAT) A. FULL SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT PROFIT COSTS ( BASE COSTS ) + B. ATE PREMIUM (if absorbed within charge to client) + C. UNRECOVERED DISBURSEMENTS (if absorbed within charge to client) D. TOTAL E. PROFIT COSTS RECOVERED FROM OTHER SIDE F. MAXIMUM FEE TO BE CHARGED TO CLIENT (25% OF DAMAGES) G. BALANCE OF D MINUS E (SHORTFALL) H. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE ( ) (F MINUS G) J. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE AS A PERCENTAGE (H as a % of A) K. Is J 100% or LESS? (If Yes, the Success Fee complies with Article 3. If not it must be reduced to 100% of A resulting in a figure of.) L. Figure to be carried forward (lower of H or J) M. Is J 0% or less? If so no Success Fee is being charged and you may stop here + Insert 0 if not absorbed in charge to client

3 PART TWO: To be completed only if a Success Fee is being charged, that is J is over 0% N. Allowed Damages Pool * P. What is H as a percentage of N? (If it is 25% or below then the Success Fee complies with Article 5(1)(a) If not it must be reduced to a figure equal to 25% of N) SUMMARY Actual Success Fee as percentage of base costs (Figure J) Actual Success Fee as percentage of Allowed Damages Pool (Figure P) * The Allowed Damages Pool consists of:- - general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity (Article 5(2)(a)) - damages for pecuniary loss, other than future pecuniary loss (Article 5(2)(b)) net of any sums recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions (CRU).

4 Form 2 CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD RTA PORTAL 3,000 (References are to The Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013) CLIENT: PART ONE COSTS (ALL FIGURES INCLUSIVE OF VAT) B. FULL SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT PROFIT COSTS ( BASE COSTS ) 1,440 + B. ATE PREMIUM (if absorbed within charge to client) - + C. UNRECOVERED DISBURSEMENTS (if absorbed within charge to client) - D. TOTAL 1,440 E. PROFIT COSTS RECOVERED FROM OTHER SIDE 600 F. MAXIMUM FEE TO BE CHARGED TO CLIENT (25% OF DAMAGES) 750 G. BALANCE OF D MINUS E (SHORTFALL) 840 H. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE ( ) (F MINUS G) - 90 J. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE AS A PERCENTAGE (H as a % of A) -6.25% K. Is J 100% or LESS? Yes (If Yes, the Success Fee complies with Article 3. If not it must be reduced to 100% of A resulting in a figure of.) L. Figure to be carried forward (lower of H or J) -6.25% M. Is J 0% or less? Yes If so no Success Fee is being charged and you may stop here + Insert 0 if not absorbed in charge to client

5 PART TWO: To be completed only if a Success Fee is being charged, that is J is over 0% N. Allowed Damages Pool * P. What is H as a percentage of N? (If it is 25% or below then the Success Fee complies with Article 5(1)(a) If not it must be reduced to a figure equal to 25% of N) SUMMARY Actual Success Fee as percentage of base costs (Figure J) -6.25% Actual Success Fee as percentage of Allowed Damages Pool (Figure P) N/A * The Allowed Damages Pool consists of:- - general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity (Article 5(2)(a)) - damages for pecuniary loss, other than future pecuniary loss (Article 5(2)(b)) net of any sums recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions (CRU).

6 Form 3 CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD RTA PORTAL 11,000 (References are to The Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013) CLIENT: PART ONE COSTS (ALL FIGURES INCLUSIVE OF VAT) C. FULL SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT PROFIT COSTS ( BASE COSTS ) 1,920 + B. ATE PREMIUM (if absorbed within charge to client) - + C. UNRECOVERED DISBURSEMENTS (if absorbed within charge to client) - D. TOTAL 1,920 E. PROFIT COSTS RECOVERED FROM OTHER SIDE 960 F. MAXIMUM FEE TO BE CHARGED TO CLIENT (25% OF DAMAGES) 2,750 G. BALANCE OF D MINUS E (SHORTFALL) 960 H. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE ( ) (F MINUS G) 1,790 J. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE AS A PERCENTAGE (H as a % of A) 93% K. Is J 100% or LESS? Yes (If Yes, the Success Fee complies with Article 3. If not it must be reduced to 100% of A resulting in a figure of.) L. Figure to be carried forward (lower of H or J) 93% M. Is J 0% or less? No If so no Success Fee is being charged and you may stop here + Insert 0 if not absorbed in charge to client

7 PART TWO: To be completed only if a Success Fee is being charged, that is J is over 0% N. Allowed Damages Pool * 8,000 P. What is H as a percentage of N? 22.4% (If it is 25% or below then the Success Fee complies with Article 5(1)(a) If not it must be reduced to a figure equal to 25% of N) SUMMARY Actual Success Fee as percentage of base costs (Figure J) 93% Actual Success Fee as percentage of Allowed Damages Pool (Figure P) 22.4% * The Allowed Damages Pool consists of:- - general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity (Article 5(2)(a)) - damages for pecuniary loss, other than future pecuniary loss (Article 5(2)(b)) net of any sums recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions (CRU).

8 Form 4 CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD RTA PORTAL (Out of Portal) 10,000 Settled pre issue (References are to The Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013) CLIENT: PART ONE COSTS (ALL FIGURES INCLUSIVE OF VAT) D. FULL SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT PROFIT COSTS ( BASE COSTS ) 4,800 + B. ATE PREMIUM (if absorbed within charge to client) - + C. UNRECOVERED DISBURSEMENTS (if absorbed within charge to client) - D. TOTAL 4,800 E. PROFIT COSTS RECOVERED FROM OTHER SIDE 2,220 F. MAXIMUM FEE TO BE CHARGED TO CLIENT (25% OF DAMAGES) 2,500 G. BALANCE OF D MINUS E (SHORTFALL) 2,580 H. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE ( ) (F MINUS G) - 80 J. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE AS A PERCENTAGE (H as a % of A) -1.67% K. Is J 100% or LESS? Yes (If Yes, the Success Fee complies with Article 3. If not it must be reduced to 100% of A resulting in a figure of.) L. Figure to be carried forward (lower of H or J) -1.67% M. Is J 0% or less? Yes If so no Success Fee is being charged and you may stop here + Insert 0 if not absorbed in charge to client

9 PART TWO: To be completed only if a Success Fee is being charged, that is J is over 0% N. Allowed Damages Pool * P. What is H as a percentage of N? (If it is 25% or below then the Success Fee complies with Article 5(1)(a) If not it must be reduced to a figure equal to 25% of N) SUMMARY Actual Success Fee as percentage of base costs (Figure J) -1.67% Actual Success Fee as percentage of Allowed Damages Pool (Figure P) N/A * The Allowed Damages Pool consists of:- - general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity (Article 5(2)(a)) - damages for pecuniary loss, other than future pecuniary loss (Article 5(2)(b)) net of any sums recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions (CRU).

10 Form 5 CFA ANALYSIS FORM USING THE UNDERWOODS METHOD EMPLOYERS LIABILITY PORTAL 20,000 out of Portal settle post-allocation pre-listing (References are to The Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013) CLIENT: PART ONE COSTS (ALL FIGURES INCLUSIVE OF VAT) E. FULL SOLICITOR AND OWN CLIENT PROFIT COSTS ( BASE COSTS ) 9,600 (see Note) + B. ATE PREMIUM (if absorbed within charge to client) 2,000 + C. UNRECOVERED DISBURSEMENTS (if absorbed within charge to client) 500 D. TOTAL 12,100 E. PROFIT COSTS RECOVERED FROM OTHER SIDE 10,020 F. MAXIMUM FEE TO BE CHARGED TO CLIENT (25% OF DAMAGES) 5,000 G. BALANCE OF D MINUS E (SHORTFALL) 2,080 H. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE ( ) (F MINUS G) 2,920 J. ACTUAL SUCCESS FEE AS A PERCENTAGE (H as a % of A) 30.4% K. Is J 100% or LESS? Yes (If Yes, the Success Fee complies with Article 3. If not it must be reduced to 100% of A resulting in a figure of.) L. Figure to be carried forward (lower of H or J) 30.4% M. Is J 0% or less? No If so no Success Fee is being charged and you may stop here

11 + Insert 0 if not absorbed in charge to client PART TWO: To be completed only if a Success Fee is being charged, that is J is over 0% N. Allowed Damages Pool * 10,000 P. What is H as a percentage of N? 29.2% (If it is 25% or below then the Success Fee complies with Article 5(1)(a) If not it must be reduced to a figure equal to 25% of N) SUMMARY Actual Success Fee as percentage of base costs (Figure J) 30.4% Actual Success Fee as percentage of Allowed Damages Pool (Figure P) 29.2% -> 25% * The Allowed Damages Pool consists of:- - general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity (Article 5(2)(a)) - damages for pecuniary loss, other than future pecuniary loss (Article 5(2)(b)) net of any sums recoverable by the Compensation Recovery Unit of the Department for Work and Pensions (CRU). Note This figure is based on 20 hours work @ 480 per hour, including VAT, which is extremely low for a case that has reached the stage of post-allocation/pre-listing and therefore it is unlikely that the cap will bite on this type of case generally.