REFERENCE: Concept of Total Cost Calculation



Similar documents
Financial Summary 3rd quarter of FY2012. January 29, 2013 Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc.

2013 TEPCO ILLUSTRATED

Revision of financial forecasts for FY ending 3/2015

Electricity market reform in Japan

Rating Methodology by Sector. Electric Power

Consolidated and Non-Consolidated Financial Statements

Electricity Market Integration in Japan

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 4, 2016

Fiscal year ending March rd Quarter Financial Results (cumulative)

1. Highlights of Consolidated Results through Third Quarter of Fiscal Year ending March 31, 2010 (1) Statements of Income

Rating Methodology by Sector. Electric Power

FY2008 First Quarter Consolidated Financial Results:

Consolidated Financial Results for the Third Quarter Ended December 31, 2014

R&I Rating Methodology by Sector

Japan s Electricity Market Reform and Beyond

Brief Statement of the Third Quarter Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ending March 2016 [Japanese GAAP (Consolidated)]

New Comprehensive Special Business Plan. Tokyo Electric Power Company [January 15, 2014]

February 2, 2016 Consolidated Financial Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2015 (From April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015) [Japan GAAP]

Comparison of Recent Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in Japan, U.K., Germany and France

Consolidated financial summary

Overview of Business Results for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year Ending March 2015 [Japanese Standard Form] (Consolidated)

Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

CONTENTS. I. TEPCO Outline. II. Power Demand. III. Electricity Supply Facilities

(April 1, 2015 June 30, 2015)

Consolidated Financial Report

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Two Quarters of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 (Japan GAAP)

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 2015

I am Toshihiko Tanaka from MS&AD Holdings. Thank you for finding time in your busy schedules to participate in our conference call today.

Consolidated Financial Review for the First Quarter Ended June 30, 2004

Summary Statement of Second Quarter Settlement of Accounts Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2009

SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTOR INFORMATION. Fourth Quarter 2012

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Three Quarters of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 (Japan GAAP)

Summary of Financial Report for the FY ending March 2015 (Non-Consolidated)

(2) Application of special accounting treatments for quarterly financial statements: Yes

Overview on SEA output

FY2015 Financial Results

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Non-consolidated Financial Statements

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTH ENDED JUNE 2013

Brief Report on Closing of Accounts (connection) for the Term Ended March 31, 2007

Nippon Mining Holdings, Inc.

Tokyo Electric Power Company, Incorporated

Mitsubishi Electric Announces Consolidated Financial Results for the First 9 Months and Third Quarter of Fiscal 2016

Financial Report for 1 st Quarter of FY (April 2015 June 2015)

Highlights of 1H FY2015 Results. November 18, 2015

May 30, International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom

CHIYODA CORPORATION Financial Results for Fiscal 2004 Third Quarter Ended December 31, 2004

Nippon Life Insurance Company (the Company ; President: Yoshinobu Tsutsui) announces financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.

FIXED CHARGE: This is a cost that goes towards making the service available, including

CORRAL PETROLEUM HOLDINGS AB (publ)

November 4, 2015 Consolidated Financial Results for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2015 (From April 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015) [Japan GAAP]

of Fiscal 2006 (Consolidated)

Financial Formulas. 5/2000 Chapter 3 Financial Formulas i

The Kansai Electric Power Company, Incorporated and Subsidiaries

FINANCIAL RESULTS Q1 2016

Comparative Role of LNG/ LPG in Japanese Market with its Policy Direction

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Quarter of the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2016 (Japan GAAP)

Acquisition of Nikko Cordial Securities Inc. and Other Businesses Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation

How To Read The Unitholders Of The Kukon Island Power Station

STANDARD SUPPLY CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIED POWER DEMAND

Consolidated Summary Report of Operating Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2011 (Year ending December 2011) [Japan GAAP]

Vattenfall Q results

JCR's Rating Review of Electric Power Companies

Mitsubishi Electric Announces Consolidated Financial Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2017

Management analysis using cash flow statement

Quarterly Securities Report

Overview of Business Results for the 2nd Quarter of Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2012 (2Q FY2011)

Net sales Operating income Ordinary income

Summary of Consolidated Business Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2015 For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2016

Citibank Japan, LTD ( CJL ) Higashi-shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo Representative Director, President & CEO Darren Buckley

26 October 2005 Summary of Non-consolidated Financial Statements for the First Half of the Financial Year Ending 31 March 2006

Bill for the Act for Partial Revision of the Electricity Business Act and Other Related acts (Outline) March, 2015

Chapter 12. National Income Accounting and the Balance of Payments. Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop

In this chapter, we build on the basic knowledge of how businesses

ČEZ, a. s. BALANCE SHEET in accordance with IFRS as of March 31, 2015 in CZK Millions

Consolidated Financial Results for the First Half of FY2008

Additional Revision to Brief Report of Settlement of Accounts for Full Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2007

Results for the Year ended March 31, May 16, 2014

West Japan Railway Company

Data Compilation Financial Data

March 13 th of March, 2014

E. V. Bulyatkin CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Summary of Financial Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Use this section to learn more about business loans and specific financial products that might be right for your company.

ČEZ, a. s. BALANCE SHEET in accordance with IFRS as of June 30, 2014 in CZK Millions

Consolidated Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 [under Japanese GAAP]

Transcription:

REFERENCE: Concept of Total Cost Calculation 0 Total Cost is the total value of s required to provide all customers with power including regulated and deregulated sectors in the calculation period *1 based on the premise plans. One of the premise plans, the Business Efficiency Plan is also reflected in the Total Cost. The scope of calculation is stipulated under the Rate Calculation Rules *2 as being the value obtained by subtracting the value of exempted revenue from the total of operating and business return. Cost-Plus (Total Cost) method is used widely in other public utility rates such as gas, railways, and water. Total Cost Cost required to provide power to customers Operating Fees Fuel Purchased power Depreciation Labor, etc. Business Return Exempted Revenue *3 Electricity Rate Revenues *1 : For future 3 years (FY2012-2014) based on the government-organized Expert Meeting on Review of Electricity Rate System and Administration comment in their report that be appropriate, in principle, to be 3 years to incorporate sufficient efforts to achieve administrative efficiency. *2: Public Power Business Power Supply Provisions Rate Calculation Rules (METI Ordinance) *3: Exempted earnings: Earnings from sources other than electricity rates for electricity business (such as charge to sell power to external power companies, power business miscellaneous income). *Please see the Consumer Affairs Agency website for information on other public utility rates.

REFERENCE: What is Business Return? 1 It refers to s for interest and dividends to ensure smooth financing required to construct and maintain power facilities such as power stations, transmission lines, and substations. In order to ensure smooth financing through stock (and not only loans from financial institutions and issuing corporate bonds), dividends, which general companies pay from profits, are included from the onset in Total Cost as a required. Stable Supply Planned construction of power facilities to meet growth in demand and instantaneous fluctuations Capital Investment Business Operation Cost Fuel, purchased power, depreciation, labor, repairs, taxes & public dues, other s Financing Cost Loans Bonds Stock Interest payment Dividends Total Cost Operating Fees Business Return Exempted Revenue

REFERENCE: Calculation of Business Return 2 When including Business Return into Total Cost, only an appropriate return (financing ) calculated by a set formula is permitted because if this is high, it would be excessive profit as a monopoly company and if it is too low, it would lead to loss of capital. In the past, the sum of interest payments, dividend amount, and profit reserves was used, but the following Rate Base System which starts from the business asset value as shown below, has been adopted based on the 1958 Electricity Rate System Investigation Committee Report due to weaknesses in encouraging operators to reduce financing s. * This is a regulatory method established in the US for regulating utilities. Aside from electricity, it has been adopted in Japan in infrastructure-related public utilities that require high levels of capital investment such as gas, railways, and water. Business asset value (Rate Base) Fixed assets, etc. (1) Business Return Rate of Return (3%)* (2) Interest, dividends Financings (Capex, etc.) Financial Institutions, Shareholders (1) Business asset value (Rate Base): The value of the amount invested into the business (true and effective assets), and is the total value for specified fixed assets, assets under construction, nuclear fuel assets, operating capital, and others. Excessive standby equipment, loaned equipment, and non-business equipment is not included. (2) Rate of Return: A rate that would allow the electricity operators to secure required financing to own these assets (ex. equipment) and achieve rational development. It is 3.0% for both current and submitted rates. *For both 1 and 2, calculation methods are stipulated in the rate calculation rules.

REFERENCE: Breakdown of Business Assets (Rate Base) 3 Breakdown of Business Assets (Rate Base) The scope of rate base when calculating Business Return and calculation methods are stipulated in the Rate Calculation Rules as following. Specified fixed assets Assets under construction Nuclear fuel assets Specified investments Working capital Deferred depreciation assets Operating power plants, transmission grid (including appropriate standby equipment) Power plants and transmission grids under construction (1/2 of construction-in-process account) Pre-load nuclear fuel, reprocessing related nuclear fuel Long-term investments for R&D and resource development 1.5 months of operating fee, etc. Deferred depreciation assets *For construction of power plants, transmission lines, substations and other facilities, the system does not allow construction of unnecessary or excessive facilities because utilities are required to develop and submit a Supply Plan to the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry each year according to Article 29 of the Electricity Utilities Industry Law. *Working capital is the capital invested as operating fee. Normally, this invested capital is dormant during the required period from the time the company supplied power to the customer until fees are received (about 1.5 months), thus necessitating a surplus of equivalent capital. The regulations allow such equivalent amount to be included in the rate base.

REFERENCE: Specific Method to Calculate Rate of Return 4 (2) Specific calculation method for Rate of Return According to Article 4 Paragraph 4 of the Public Power Business Power Supply Provisions Rate Calculation Rules, the Rate of Return is stipulated as being a weighted average rate where shareholder capital rate of return and outside capital rate of return is weighted 30 to 70. The shareholder capital rate of return is calculated with the maximum value being the value equivalent to the actual rate of shareholders capital profit rate of all industries excluding all public power operators and the minimum being the actual value of public corporation bond yields such as government and regional bonds. The outside capital rate of return is to be the average interest-bearing debt of all public power operators. When calculating the actual shareholders capital rate of return, the beta value, which is the elastic value of power company shares against the stock value of the overall market, is used as an indicator expressing the administrative risks of the power business. This allows use of the weighted average between shareholders capital of all industries excluding all public power operators and actual value of public corporation bond yields. Business rate of return = value of power business assets (rate base) x rate of return Rate of return = [Shareholders capital rate of return x shareholders capital ratio (30%)] + [outside capital rate of return x outside capital ratio (70%)] -Shareholders capital rate of return = (public corporation bond yield actual value x (1-beta) + All industry (excluding all power companies) shareholder capital profit rate x beta) *beta value (Electric power business administration risk. Generally, the average rate of increase of power business stock when the stock value of the overall market increases 1%.) -Outside capital rate of return = average interest-bearing debt interest rate of 10 power companies.* *Interest-bearing debt interest rate = paid interest divided by outstanding interest-bearing debt (corporate bond + long-term loans + short term loans +CP) *Calculation rules stipulated by 1995 Electric Power Company Review Committee Electric Fee System Working Group. *Excerpt from METI 6 th Expert Meeting on Review of Electricity Rate System and Administration (held March 15, 2012) Report (p34)

Brief Difference in Earnings Between Household Customers (Regulated) and Corporate Customers (Deregulated) There was newspaper and TV coverage that TEPCO generates 90% of profits from regulated sector customers such as households. Here, we provide explanation on the difference in earnings by sector (sector-specific earnings). Electricity rates are decided based on rules. Electricity rates for regulated and deregulated sectors are calculated based on METI Ordinance rules (Public Power Business Power Supply Provisions Rate Calculation Rules) by distributing projected s. Sector-specific earnings calculated by distributing actual income and s for regulated and deregulated sectors, respectively, are also submitted to the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry every year with a auditing firm s certificate in accordance with METI rules. TEPCO also is subject to governmental administrative audits after submitting calculation results. The major reasons why TEPCO s profit now tends to be generated more from households and other regulated sector customers is provided in the following slides.

1. Balance of profit from household customers and corporate customers varies by fiscal year The ratio of profit against sales (profit ratio) in deregulated sector (ex. companies) and regulated sector (ex. households) may be similar or very different depending on the year. This difference between sectors are due to different impact of fluctuations in fuel s and facility s. For example, when nuclear power plants shutdown and thermal power fuel s increase dramatically, profit in the deregulated sector is compressed significantly in comparative terms. Profit rate: Households (regulated sector) Profit rate: Corporate (deregulated sector) Capacity factor of nuclear power plants *Profit rate: Ratio of profit against sales See next slide Revise rate Revise rate Revise rate Revise rate Revise rate FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY02: Nuclear scandal All NPPs shutdown in Apr. 03 July 07: Niigata Chuetsu-oki Earthquake Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP shutdown

2. Why was a loss marked in FY07 overall, while regulated sector (households) was profitable and deregulated sector (companies) marked a loss? FY2006 (100 million yen) Corporate (deregulated) Households (regulated) 5.3% 5.3% Profit rate Current net profit Sales Profit rate is balanced between sectors In FY06, profit rates were balanced, but there was a large discrepancy in FY07. Special Circumstances FY2007 (Actual) The complete shutdown of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPS due to the Chuetsu-oki Earthquake caused the ratio of thermal power to increase. Thermal power fuel increased due to historical highs in fuel price. (100 mil yen) Due to thorough -cutting mainly focusing on facility s, household (regulated) sector showed a positive profit rate with its comparatively high facility. 2.3% Difference Overall Profit rate 124 Current net profit Sales There was a significant loss in deregulated sector profits with -2.6% its comparatively high ratio of fuel s. FY07 if Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPS had not shutdown 8.9% 7.4% (100 mill. yen) *Profit rate: Ratio of profits against sales Profit rate Current net profit Sales *Totals may not add up due to rounding. If there was no increase in fuel s due to the earthquake (approx. 420 billion yen), profits would be balanced appropriately.

Reference: Fluctuation of fuel prices In the last 10 years, the energy market and the surrounding environment has changed drastically. Looking at the crude oil prices, it dipped below $20/barrel in FY00, but with the strong global economy, it temporarily exceeded $130/barrel in FY08. It decreased to $40/barrel levels after the Lehman Crisis but has increased again to above $110. (yen/t) ($/ b) LNG price JPY/t Fuel coal price JPY/t Crude oil price $/b FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 *Foreign trade statistical year average values

3. Why is the electricity rate for regulated sector (households) (23yen/kWh) higher than for deregulated sector (companies) (15yen/kWh)? *Avg. rate price per sector (before revision) <Ratio between variable s (ex. fuel) and fixed s (ex. facility s) among the actual rate price> Companies (deregulated) Extra-high voltage, high voltage: Households (regulated) Low voltage: Fuel : 9yen Fuel : 10 yen Facility : 6yen Facility : 13 yen 15 yen/kwh 8 yen/kwh Higher for regulated sector (households) 23 yen/kwh The reason why rate price for regulated sector exceeds deregulated sector (about 8yen/kWh) is because there are more facilities required to deliver electrical power to regulated sector (households) (about 6yen/kWh). The remaining 2yen/kWh is because there is more transmission loss for regulated sector customers (households). Delivery of electricity to customers Transmission lines Hydro power plants Transmission lines Transmission lines Mega solar & wind power Transmission lines Distribution lines Households (regulated sector) customers Low voltage (100V/200V) Service line Service line Residences Thermal power plants Transmission lines Ultra high voltage substation Primary substation Transmission/ Distributing substation distribution lines Corporate (deregulated sector) customers Pole transformer Electric pole Underground distribution lines Service line Shops Small factories Nuclear power plants Power Generation Large factory Transmission Extra high voltage/ high voltage Buildings, mid-sized factories Distribution Buildings, mid-sized factories Customers

Terms: What is sector-specific profit? Q1. What it is? Because electricity is delivered to customers in general, it is not possible to physically differentiate which s for power plants and transmission lines are spent on which customers. However, to clearly clarify profits between deregulated sector customers (companies) and regulated sector customers (households), s for each fiscal year are separated using the same calculation methods as calculation rules for establishing electricity rate to verify profits for each sector. Calculation rules are stipulated by law and is submitted to the Minister after being audited. Q2. Why is it calculated by sector? The deregulated sector (companies) is a competitive market where customers can choose the operator from new utilities (PPS) and other electric power companies, thus creating concern concern that operators will dump so customers will choose them. Therefore, this mechanism checks that the interest of regulated sector customers (households) are not adversely affected such as by increasing the electricity rate for regulated customers when the overall profit worsens. Other FAQs regarding Electricity Rate Increase For more information on Electricity Rate Increase Regulated sector (households) Deregulated sector (companies) http://www.tepco.co.jp/e-rates/individual/kaitei2012/index-j.html http://www.tepco.co.jp/e-rates/corporate/index-j.html

Reference: Concept of Profit Impact Due to Different Fuel Cost and Facility Cost Ratios <Cost = electricity rate income> <Cost> (fuel increase) <Cost> ( reduction) <Cost> (Total) Profit/Loss Facility (fixed ) 60 Fuel (variable ) 40 Facility (fixed ) 40 Fuel (variable ) 60 Increased thermal fuel due to decrease in nuclear power capacity factor (+15%) Fuel (variable ) 46 Fuel (variable ) 69 Facility (fixed ) 51 Facility (fixed ) 34 Cost reduction such as deferred repairs to alleviate tough P&L conditions (-15%) Facility (fixed ) 51 Fuel (variable ) 46 Facility (fixed ) 34 Fuel (variable ) 69 Possibility of profits in regulated but losses in deregulated sector Total P&L is affected by fluctuation of income and fixed s and is not proportional to the ratio of power sold. Deregulated Regulated Deregulated Regulated Deregulated Regulated Deregulated Regulated Deregulated Regulated Power sold 40%:60% *Ratio of fuel (variable s) corresponding to power sold is proportional (fixed ratio is not proportional).