6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 1 of 6



Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendant. )

Case 2:09-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:05-cv GJQ Document 1 Filed 10/27/2005 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

JOHN THANH HOANG, individually and ) L0

Case 4:13-cv A Document 1 Filed 06/18/13 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. under 26 U.S.C and 7407 from directly or indirectly;

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/10/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2013 Page 1 of 15

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF

Case 4:07-cv Document 1 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

CONSENT OF DEFENDANT PAUL W. JENNINGS

Case 8:11-cv VMC-TBM Document 1 Filed 05/03/11 Page 1 of 22 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

Case 2:10-cv MAG -VMM Document 1 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv EAK-AEP Document 1 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

STATEMENT UNDER LOCAL RULE 7.1(a)(3) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/16/14 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

CASE 0:09-cv RHK-AJB Document 8 Filed 03/19/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Case 0:13-cv WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO EASTERN DIVISION

2:14-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 07/30/14 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 8

Case 2:05-mc Document 407 Filed 04/08/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

CHAPTER 80G BULLION COIN DEALERS

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

IN TUE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS Division 1. v. Case No. 00 C 1394

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case 3:15-cv D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 6:13-cv LRR Document 147 Filed 02/04/15 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION

Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec

the seal of the National Archives and Records Administration, that the attached reproduction(s) is TiTLE Regional Administrator, Pacific Alaska Region

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

I Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 106 cd 503

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

Case 1:11-cv LEK -RLP Document 1 Filed 05/03/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case No. CV Plaintiff, the State ofidaho, Department of Finance ("Department"), and Defendant, Bart

CONSENT OF DEFENDANT GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

Case 3:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv DWF/JSM

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Philip V. McGuire, Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This is a proceeding to revoke the registration of Prestige Capital Advisors, LLC

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION 2Dub APR - 3 PI: 41 COMPLAINT

Transcription:

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 6:06-cv-01862-HFF JOHN-HOWARD ( ALEX ALEXANDER, a/k/a HOWARD IRA SMALL, individually and d/b/a the AWARE GROUP, FREEDOM TRUST GROUP, and INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION Plaintiff, the United States of America, has filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction against defendant John Howard Alexander ( Alexander. Alexander does not admit the allegations in the Complaint, except that he admits that the Court has jurisdiction over him and over the subject matter of this action. Alexander waives the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 and Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C. (26 U.S.C. 7402(a and 7408. Alexander consents to entry of this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction without admitting that grounds exist for imposition of an injunction. -1-

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 2 of 6 Alexander enters into this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction voluntarily and waives any right he may have to appeal from it. Alexander consents to entry of this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction without further notice and agrees that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over him for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. The Court accordingly ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1340 and 1345 and I.R.C. 7402(a and 7408. 2. The Court finds that the tax-fraud schemes promoted by Alexander violate various provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. 3. The Court finds that Alexander consents to the entry of this injunction. 4. It is further ORDERED that Alexander, individually and doing business under any other name or using any other entity, and his representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, is permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly: (a Making representations, in connection with the organization or sale of any shelter, plan, or arrangement, that: (1 the United States includes only the District of Columbia and territories over which the federal Government has exclusive jurisdiction; (2 United States citizens are non-resident aliens with respect to the federal Government and not subject to taxation; -2-

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 3 of 6 (3 residents of South Carolina (or any other state are not required to file tax returns reporting income while working in the United States; (4 residents of South Carolina (or any other state are not required to pay tax on income while working in the United States; (5 residents of South Carolina (or any other state can revoke or rescind their Social Security number in order to legally discontinue paying income or employment taxes; (6 residents of South Carolina (or any other state can revoke an implied contract with the United States in order to legally stop filing income tax returns and paying income taxes by filing frivolous documents Government; and th (7 the 16 Amendment created no new power of taxation and did not amend or change the constitutional limits that forbid any direct taxation on individuals. (b Selling services designed to assist customers to evade reporting, filing, and paying taxes, including: person; (1 The preparation and sale of correspondence to the IRS on behalf of any other (2 Obstructing or advising or assisting anyone to obstruct IRS examinations, collections, or other IRS proceedings; federal taxes; (3 Advising anyone that they are not required to file federal tax returns or pay (4 Instructing, advising, or assisting anyone to stop withholding federal employment taxes from wages; -3-

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 4 of 6 (5 Selling or distributing any newsletter, book, manual, videotape, audiotape, or other material containing false commercial speech regarding the internal revenue laws or speech likely to incite others imminently to violate the internal revenue laws; (6 Selling Reliance Defense letters, which falsely advise that U.S.-source income is not taxable; (7 Selling Declarations of Citizenship which falsely state that the individual is a U.S.-citizen not subject to federal taxation; (8 Selling Affidavits of Revocation which falsely purport to revoke the individual s Security number; and (9 Selling U.C.C. filings which falsely state that an individual can revoke or rescind their obligation to: (1 file income returns, (2 pay income taxes, or (3 respond to IRS directives or requests for information. (c Organizing (or assisting in organizing or participating, directly or indirectly, in the sale of any interest in any entity, plan, or arrangement, including but not limited to those discussed above, that incites or assists customers to attempt to violate the internal revenue laws or unlawfully evade the assessment or collection of their federal tax liabilities or unlawfully claim improper tax refunds; (d Engaging in activity subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. 6700, including making, in connection with the organization or sale of any plan or arrangement, any statement about the securing of any tax benefit that the defendant knows or has reason to know is false as to any material matter; -4-

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 5 of 6 (e Engaging in activity subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. 6701, including procuring, preparing and/or assisting in the preparation of documents related to a matter material to the internal revenue laws that defendant knows will result in the understatement of another person s tax liability; (f Engaging in any other activity subject to penalty under 26 U.S.C. 6701; (g Engaging in conduct subject to penalty under any provision of the Internal Revenue Code, or engaging in any other conduct that interferes with the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws; and (h Misrepresenting the terms of this injunction. 5. It is further ORDERED pursuant to I.R.C. 7402(a that Alexander and his representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him shall remove from defendant s website, false commercial speech regarding the internal revenue laws, and speech likely to incite others imminently to violate of the internal revenue laws; 6. It is further ORDERED that Alexander fulfill the requirements of paragraph 5 within 20 days of the entry of this judgment. 7. It is further ORDERED that the United States is permitted to engage in post-judgment discovery to ensure compliance with this permanent injunction. 8. It is further ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. -5-

6:06-cv-01862-HFF Date Filed 11/17/2006 Entry Number 12 Page 6 of 6 SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2006. s/henry F. Floyd HENRY F. FLOYD United States District Judge Consented to and Agreed: s/ J. Bradley Bennett J. BRADLEY BENNETT Attorney for Defendant REGINALD I. LLOYD United States Attorney s/john Howard Alexander JOHN HOWARD ALEXANDER Defendant s/george J. Conits GEORGE J. CONITS Assistant United States Attorney District Bar No. 234 District of South Carolina P.O. Box l0067 Greenville, S.C. 29603 THOMAS M. NEWMAN Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 7238 Washington D.C. 20044-6-