UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants.



Similar documents
Case3:07-cv JSW Document123 Filed10/12/12 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv CRB Document51-1 Filed03/22/13 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 3:09-md BTM- KSC

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION


UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION No DM

Case 5:13-cv LHK Document Filed 01/14/16 Page 1 of 8

f?elw 4 NOV 1211 O3USDc-tee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON No. CV HA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION

Case 1:06-cv LAK Document 127 Filed 03/06/14 Page 1 of 11

2:14-mn RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

Case3:12-cv CRB Document Filed08/31/15 Page1 of 8 EXHIBIT 9

IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT

Case 1:13-cv AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13

COMPLAINT. NOW COMES Plaintiff, BRANDON SMITH, by his undersigned attorneys, LOEVY &

FILED THE HONORABLE MARY YU HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

Case 1:08-cv LTS-DCF Document 264 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : :

Case 9:15-bk DS Doc 30 Filed 12/16/15 Entered 12/16/15 14:42:26 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Case 1:14-cv FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:08-cv JSW Document 5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

* IN THE. * CASE NO.: 24-C Defendant * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM

Case5:14-cv EJD Document43 Filed04/09/14 Page1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv LHK

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:08-cv CM. Parties and Attorneys

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 76 Filed 06/23/2008 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SADRUDIN LAIWALA, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Case: 1:10-hc JGC Doc #: 61 Filed: 02/03/10 1 of 7. PageID #: 727

Case: EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER

Case3:07-md SI Document6657 Filed09/07/12 Page1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

How To Answer A Complaint In A Civil Case

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL 11-cv DMS (WVG)

Case3:11-cv SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM. To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

I Thomas Lumsden. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. 5 Accountants and Financial Advisors for Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 6 83A

E-FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Peter MacKinnon, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CASE NO. 111 CV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Case 2:13-ml GW-FFM Document Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:7559 EXHIBIT 8

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv LHK

Appeal No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Case 6:09-bk CB Doc 32 Filed 02/01/10 Entered 02/01/10 12:20:27 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

(1) Conventional filing means a process whereby a filer files a paper document with the court.

Case 8:14-bk ES Doc 41 Filed 04/04/14 Entered 04/04/14 14:28:51 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Upon the motion of the Debtors for entry of an order pursuant to Bankruptcy

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:12-cv FB-HJB Document 68 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

Case 1:11-md RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C STATE OF GEORGIA. AMENDED ORDER Il\1PLElVIENTING ELECTRONIC-FILING FOR CIVIL CASES

Case 3:15-cv MO Document 50 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 5

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan

Case LT Filed 05/14/14 Entered 05/14/14 14:14:36 Doc 6 Pg. 1 of 13

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE [INSERT STATE/JURISDICTION] FAMILY DIVISION--DOMESTIC RELATIONS BRANCH

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

You have been identified as a member of a Class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may affect your rights.

GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES ORANGE COUNTY RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE CASES Effective January 6, 2014

Case 2:14-cv GMN-GWF Document 18 Filed 06/26/14 Page 1 of 139

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Case 3:08-cv WHA Document 69 Filed 05/26/2009 Page 1 of 5 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

Case 2:07-cv SFC-MKM Document 132 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. Case No.:


Attorneys for Plainliff Dallas Faulkner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv N Document 473 Filed 06/15/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

8:09-mn JFA Date Filed 06/28/12 Entry Number 228 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

How Do I Apply to Reopen My Bankruptcy Case to File the Financial Management Course Certificate?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

Potentially Exculpatory Evidence in Protected/Private/Controlled Record CITY v. DEFENDANT, JUSTICE COURT Case No

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Virginia

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

Case 3:08-cv JM-CAB Document 9 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR Tel:

Case4:14-cv JSW Document38-1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 13

Case 1:13-cv JJO Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Civil Action No.: RDB MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 8:13-cv GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Ship From Sailing

Transcription:

Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 VICTORIA K. HALL (SBN 240602 LAW OFFICE OF VICTORIA K HALL 401 N. Washington St. Suite 550 Rockville MD 20850 Victoria@vkhall-law.com Telephone: 301-738-7677 Facsimile: 240-536-9142 Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT JACOBSEN 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ROBERT JACOBSEN, v. MATTHEW KATZER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. No. C-06-1905-JSW DECLARATION OF VICTORIA HALL IN SUPPORT OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Courtroom: Judge: 2, 17th Floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Victoria Hall, have personal knowledge to the facts stated herein and hereby declare as follows: 1. I am the attorney for Plaintiff Robert Jacobsen in this matter. I am submitting this Declaration in Support of the Case Management Statement filed by Mr. Jacobsen. 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email exchange between R. Scott Jerger and Victoria K. Hall, dated Aug. 3, 2006. 3. I did not agree to any deadline relating to the Patent Local Rules, as Mr. Jerger states in his email in Exhibit A. No. C-06-1905-JSW 1 DECLARATION OF VICTORIA HALL IN SUPPORT OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 7 1 2 4. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email response by David M. Zeff to the email exchange in Ex. A 3 4 5 6 7 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 4th day of August, 2006, in Rockville, Maryland. 8 9 10 11 By Victoria Hall /s/ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-06-1905-JSW 2 DECLARATION OF VICTORIA HALL IN SUPPORT OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 7 Hall Declaration Ex. A

http://email.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?folder=inbox&list=697 8/4/2006 Web-Based Email :: Print Page 1 of 1 Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 7 Print Close Window Subject: RE: Dates for Docket 41 From: "Scott Jerger" <scott@fieldlawfirm.com> Date: Thu, Aug 03, 2006 4:40 pm To: <victoria@vkhall-law.com>, <zefflaw1@aol.com> Cc: "Jonathan Smale" <Jonathan@fieldlawfirm.com> You ve got Oct 27 th for the next CMC, which is fine with me. I can t agree to a hearing on motions to dismiss newly added claims in Amended Complaint on October 27 th since there is no amended complaint at this time. As for- Meet and confer re initial disclosures and ADR-you have August 22 and I have August 21 st in my timeline. I am fine with either day. As for-complete Rule 26 disclosures and address topics in Patent Local R. 2.1, you have Sept. 5 th, which is fine by me. I have August 25 th for completion of initial disclosures, which is 14 days after the initial CMC. Scott Jerger Field Jerger LLP 610 SW Alder, Suite 910 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.542.2015 (phone 503.225.0276 (fax 503.516.7127 (mobile From: victoria@vkhall-law.com [mailto:victoria@vkhall-law.com] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:04 PM To: Scott Jerger; zefflaw1@aol.com Subject: Dates for Docket 41 Gentlemen, We need dates for the items in Docket 41 and the next CMC. I suggested some in my draft a couple weeks ago, but do not have it with me. Please note that the judge appears to be unavailable on Fridays for late October, all of November, and early December. Victoria Hall Copyright 2003-2006. All rights reserved.

Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 5 of 7 Hall Declaration Ex. B

http://email.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?folder=inbox&list=698 8/4/2006 Web-Based Email :: Print Page 1 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 6 of 7 Print Close Window Subject: Jacobsen v. KAM, Re: Dates for Docket 41, our file 9340 From: ZeffLaw1@aol.com Date: Thu, Aug 03, 2006 4:48 pm To: scott@fieldlawfirm.com, victoria@vkhall-law.com Cc: Jonathan@fieldlawfirm.com, Raggmop1@pacbell.net(James W. Moore What works for Mr. Jerger below also works for me. I am in trial in Sept., so I may need some leeway when the dates approach. Thanks, DMZ In a message dated 8/3/2006 4:43:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, scott@fieldlawfirm.com writes: Youâ ve got Oct 27 th for the next CMC, which is fine with me. I canâ t agree to a hearing on â œmotions to dismiss newly added claims in Amended Complaintâ on October 27 th since there is no amended complaint at this time. As for- Meet and confer re initial disclosures and ADR-you have August 22 and I have August 21 st in my timeline. I am fine with either day. As for-complete Rule 26 disclosures and address topics in Patent Local R. 2.1, you have Sept. 5 th, which is fine by me. I have August 25 th for completion of initial disclosures, which is 14 days after the initial CMC. Scott Jerger Field Jerger LLP 610 SW Alder, Suite 910 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.542.2015 (phone 503.225.0276 (fax 503.516.7127 (mobile From: victoria@vkhall-law.com [mailto:victoria@vkhall-law.com] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:04 PM To: Scott Jerger; zefflaw1@aol.com Subject: Dates for Docket 41 Gentlemen, We need dates for the items in Docket 41 and the next CMC. I suggested some in my draft a couple weeks ago, but do not have it with me. Please note that the judge appears to be unavailable on Fridays for late October, all of November, and early December. Victoria Hall

http://email.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?folder=inbox&list=698 8/4/2006 Web-Based Email :: Print Page 2 of 2 Case 3:06-cv-01905-JSW Document 82 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 7 of 7 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION! This email and any documents accompanying it are privileged and confidential information and are only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, your dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is neither intended, nor allowed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, collect, at (415 923-1380, and return by mail or destroy this message and any copies of this email and documents that accompany it. No waiver of any privilege or right may be inferred from an erroneous delivery of this email. Thank you. Copyright 2003-2006. All rights reserved.