WR305, Writing for the Web Usability Test Documents



Similar documents
An Introduction to Coding and Analyzing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Dr. Allen Brizee, Loyola University Maryland

A Usability Test Plan for The San Antonio College Website

MAC Magic Mouse. Usability Test Plan

Evaluation of the Introduction of e-learning into engineering mechanics

School Counseling Competency Portfolio Rubric

Continuous Improvement:

Gersh & Sarah Lemberg Children'ʹs Center, Inc. 457 Old South St, MS #044, Brandeis University Waltham, MA

Privacy Policy. MSI may collect information from you on a voluntary basis when you:

Teaching Phonetics with Online Resources

DECLINING PATIENT SITUATIONS: A Study with New RN Residents

Memo. Open Source Development and Documentation Project English 420. instructor name taken out students names taken out OSDDP Proposal.

Premium Advertising Sweden UK France Germany


Conducting the Parent and Family Involvement Survey for your school(s): Instructions and Guidelines

Three Forms of the Global Perspective Inventory

Running head: BODY ART AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS 1

Guidelines for Using the Retrospective Think Aloud Protocol with Eye Tracking

How To Know How Well You Did At A Nonprofit Leadership And Management Program

RESEARCH PARTICIPANT INFORMED CONSENT AND PRIVACY AUTHORIZATION FORM

Google Cloud Storage Experience Usability Study Plan

Privacy Statement. Privacy Practices and Feedback

Ithaca College Survey Research Center Survey Research Checklist and Best Practices

Multiple Measures. by Victoria L. Bernhardt

DUOLINGO USABILITY TEST: MODERATOR S GUIDE

DRAFT US-EDI Early Development Instrument. Teacher s User Manual

Accounting Ethics: How to Stop the Scandals

Ux test SU Bookstore SAINT CHRISTOPHER MONTERROSO By: St. Christopher Monterroso

APPENDIX G. Usability Test Procedures and Script

Examining Science and Engineering Students Attitudes Toward Computer Science

RUNNING HEAD: TEACHER PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING TOOLS. Teacher Perceptions as an Integral Component in the Development of Online Learning Tools

Usability Test Plan Docutek ERes v University of Texas Libraries

Address Co-Principal Investigator Information Co- Principal Investigator Faculty Staff Grad. Student Undergrad. Student

Altisource U.S. Consumer Privacy Notice and Online Privacy Policy

EHR Usability Test Report of Radysans EHR version 3.0

Classroom communication and interaction are. 15 Clicker Lessons: Assessing and Addressing Student Responses to Audience Response Systems.

Software Requirements Specification

SPSS Workbook 1 Data Entry : Questionnaire Data

The perceptions of business students regarding management information systems (MIS) programs

Barriers & Incentives to Obtaining a Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing

Gender Differences in Computer Technology Achievement

!"#$%&'(&)*+"#+,#)-.#/").0"#1.&0# &)#)-.#23-++'#+,#4(05*"67# 8*9:*,.0;#&"9#<.&')-#2;5).=5!

School Bullying Survey

How to Plan and Guide In Class Peer Review Sessions

Institutional Review Board for the Use of Human Subjects in Research GUIDELINES FOR A PROPOSAL NARRATIVE

Research Ethics Review Committee (WHO ERC)

Evaluation of the Pilot of the Desire2Learn Learning Management System Implemented in Fall 2013

Green Pharm is committed to your privacy. We disclose our information practices below and we agree to notify you of:

Master of Business Administration ApplicationForm

HE STEM Staff Culture Survey Guidance

Usability Testing Basics. An Overview

Examining the Role of Online Courses in Native Hawaiian Culture and Language at the University of Hawaii

ABOUT UMUC S ONLINE EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Usability Evaluation with Users CMPT 281

Education at the Crossroads: Online Teaching and Students' Perspectives on Distance Learning

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Scratch Primary Lesson 4

Application for Admission to MBA

COMCAST.COM - PRIVACY STATEMENT

Attitudes, Concerns and Opinions Relating to the Provision of Emergency Medical Services

The School Psychologist s Role in Response to Intervention (RtI): Factors that influence. RtI implementation. Amanda Yenni and Amie Hartman

Monterey County Behavioral Health 2013 Satisfaction Survey Outcomes

Practicing Teachers Perceptions of Social Presence and Future Success: The Value of Online Learning. Ordene V. Edwards, PhD.

State University of New York at Canton Institutional Review Board. Sample Informed Consent Document

Minnesota Tablet Usability Study Report

ETHICAL ELECTRIC PRIVACY POLICY. Last Revised: December 15, 2015

COURSE PREFIX AND NUMBER: -

Michigan State University Human Resources

USABILITY TEST. Appendix A. May 2001 TECHSOURCE COLLEGE LIBRARY (TCL)

Procedia Computer Science

Urbanspoon is a social lifestyle site consisting of user-generated reviews of local

Master of Public Administration Program. Department of Political Science Idaho State University

Satisfaction in the Workplace

DARTFISH PRIVACY POLICY

IOM Data Privacy and Accuracy Policy

Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium (HEDS) Sexual Assault Campus Climate Survey

Transcription:

WR305, Writing for the Web Usability Test Documents Introduction This documents contains the portfolio usability test informed consent form, participant demographic questionnaire, protocols, and surveys that you will use to assess your web site in week seven of the term and help you revise it for the end of the semester. Normally, web writers and designers would develop their own test methods. But in many cases, customized testing resources are augmented by existing models. To simplify our testing process, I am providing these resources. If you feel that they do not work with your site or provide you with information that you need, let me know, and we can discuss altering or expanding them to match your requirements. Usability Testing Script and Protocols Purpose: The purpose of this test is to collect data from participants while they use students online portfolios. Portfolio authors should use this data to help them improve their web sites for a final grade at the end of the term. Under normal testing conditions, designers would collect data from at least 11 participants. Moreover, data would be collected by multiple data recorders. For this test session, however, portfolio authors will collect data individually and work with one participant. The basic tests contained here will form the baseline for data collection that will be augmented by eye tracking tests later in the term. Portfolio authors will use eye tracking data collected using the EyeGuide system to help make final changes to their web sites. Procedure: Please follow the steps outlined below. Your script is indicated in italics: 1. Hand the informed consent form to the participant and explain what the form is and what it says. Ask the participant if s/he has any questions. Then ask the participant to sign the form if they agree to the terms. 2. Hand the demographic questionnaire to the participant and explain what the form is and what it says. Ask the participant if s/he has any questions. Tell the participant that s/he may choose to not answer any questions s/he is not comfortable answering. 3. Read the following: a. Thank you for agreeing to spend time with us today. Please remember that you can stop testing at any time for any reason. If you are uncomfortable or want a break for any reason, simply tell me and we will take a break. My name is (FIRST NAME), and I can answer any questions that may occur to you during testing. In addition to walking you through these tests, I am recording your navigation paths, timing how long it takes you to complete tasks, counting mouse clicks, and noting phrases that you use to describe the web site we are testing today. Overall, this test should take about an hour. We may break at any time, or you may choose not to continue the testing if you feel uncomfortable.

WR305 Usability Test Documents 2 Informed Consent Form (This is a sample form used for class and not part of a formal research study) Purpose of Research The purpose of this research is to test the usability of students online portfolios. Students are completing these portfolios as part of coursework for WR305. Specific Procedures to be Used Participants will fill out a demographic survey, complete task-based protocols on the web site to find information, and fill out a post-test questionnaire. Duration of Participation The usability test session should take about an hour. Benefits to the Individual Participants will learn about usability testing and about using a writing student online portfolio. I may contribute to a body of knowledge that supports innovation in web writing and usability research. Risks to the Individual Risks for participating in this study are minimal and are no more than I would encounter in everyday life or in the course of my studies at Loyola University Maryland. Compensation Participants will not receive any compensation for this study. Confidentiality Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed because of the nature of large groups the class. Participant responses cannot be guaranteed to be anonymous because Allen Brizee cannot guarantee that other classroom participants will not disclose my participation in the study. Furthermore, documents created for the course will be posted on the Internet. Information collected from me during the test will be stored by the tester (the portfolio author). Aggregate results data compiled from test responses will be shared with the class and included in usability reports that will be posted online. No information from this course-based study will be published in peer-reviewed venues. Voluntary Nature of Participation While the usability testing is part of the class requirements, I understand that I can stop the testing process at any time without penalty. Participant s Signature and Date

WR305 Usability Test Documents 3 Participant Demographic Questionnaire Age: Gender: Male Female I prefer not to identify Race: 1. On a scale of 1 to 5 (with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest), how would you describe your level of technical competence, e.g., levels of comfort or skill using the Internet? 1 2 3 4 5 2. How many hours per week do you spend on the Internet? 1-5 6-11 12-17 18+ 3. Why do you use the Internet? Please circle all that apply. Pleasure (to find out what I would like to know, to watch television shows, play games, etc.) School work or research Facebook or other social media Emailing Banking Other (please explain) 4. What are some features that you think are important in making a web page usercentered? 5. What kinds of information would you expect to see in a writer s online portfolio?

WR305 Usability Test Documents 4 Task-Based Protocols This protocol is a quantitative, task-based process combined with a short questionnaire about the experience. The proctor will ask the participant questions that will require them to find information in the online portfolio, time the participant, count mouse clicks, and track navigation paths. Note: Make sure each computer has the home set to the landing page of the portfolio. Note #2: The proctor is permitted to repeat the task or clarify questions about the task itself but is not to assist the participant or answer questions relating to the navigation of the site as a whole. (i.e., the proctor can help the participant understand the task but not complete it). Proctor: The computer in front of you is displaying the landing page of the web site we are testing today. During this phase of the test, we would like you to use the site to find specific information, which will be given to you shortly. You are not going to be evaluated on your proficiency with navigating the Internet or using the computer, rather, this test is to see how well the site allows you to find particular information. That is, we are testing the site and not you. Task 1: What is the first news story summary written by the portfolio author? Task 2: Where is the author of the portfolio from originally? Task 3: What is the author s email address?

WR305 Usability Test Documents 5 After-Test Survey and Questionnaire Please fill out this survey and questionnaire based on your experiences with the portfolio and this testing session. Thank you for your time today. On a scale from 1 (lowest score) to 5 (highest score), please circle your response to the following: 1. Overall, this web site rates a: 1 2 3 4 5 2. The content of this web site rates a: 1 2 3 4 5 3. The design of the web site pages rates a: 1 2 3 4 5 4. The organizations (taxonomy) of the web site rates a: 1 2 3 4 5 Please respond to the Likert scale questions below (Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree): 1. This web site is usable: SA A N D SD 2. This web site makes me feel as if the author/designer is credible: SA A N D SD 3. I would feel comfortable hiring this writer: SA A N D SD What did you like about the web site? What did you not like about the web site? What suggestions do you have for improving the web site? What did you think of the testing process? How would you improve the testing process?