PHILOSOPHY 101: CRITICAL THINKING



Similar documents
Introduction to Symbolic Logic Vaishali Khandekar, PhD Course Description: PREREQUISITE(S): CO-REQUISITE(S): FREQUENT REQUISITES

Philosophy 3: Critical Thinking University of California, Santa Barbara Fall 2011

PVAMU Course Syllabus for: Philosophy 2303 Critical Thinking Division of Social Work, Behavioral, and Political Sciences

Florida Gulf Coast University Finite Math M GF 1106 Spring 2014 CRN 11072

University of Lethbridge LOGI 1000 XOL/YOL/ZOL. Critical Thinking

FINC 4531 B Intermediate Corporate Finance Tuesdays and Thursdays from 5:30-6:45, Adamson 227 Expanded Course Outline Fall 2010

L.A. Mission College Sylmar, California Spring 2012 Philosophy 06: Logic in Practice (3395) Thur 6:50-10:00 pm in Instr 1002

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS MATH 2050

PHIL 1010 Georgia State University Fall 2008 Critical Thinking Department of Philosophy George Rainbolt

Brown, Neil M. and Stuart M. Keeley. Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, 11 th ed.

ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY/GLEN ROSE HIGH SCHOOL TRIGONOMETRY WITH ANALYTIC GEOMETRY MATH 1353 SPRING OF 2016

ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY/GLEN ROSE HIGH SCHOOL DUAL CREDIT ALGEBRA II AND COLLEGE ALGEBRA/MATH

Course Syllabus Introduction to Logic PHILOSOPHY (M 7:05-9:45 p.m.) G-241 (Revised Spring 2012)

Philosophy 210: Logic and Critical Thinking (Spring 2015) Syllabus This syllabus is subject to change.

LINCOLN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL STUDIES COURSE SYLLABUS

2. Demonstrate patient advocacy in making appropriate ethical nursing responses in client care. 3. Perform patient care measures to relieve pain and

COURSE SYLLABUS PHILOSOPHY 001 CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING SPRING 2012

Principles of Entrepreneurship

PHIL : CRITICAL THINKING

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS LEGAL WRITING & ANALYSIS LAW 1050

CHAPTER 3. Methods of Proofs. 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs

Communication 170: Semester Interpersonal Communication Classroom: meeting day and time Stephen F. Austin State University

Child Development 382 Professional Seminar in Child Development: Current Issues Fall 2016 Tuesdays 5-7:50pm in Modoc 120

PSYC 3200-C Child Psychology 3 SEMESTER HOURS

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FEEDBACK AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LEARNING

Course Description. Required Textbook

General Psychology PSYC Fall, 2009

OSU CASCADES. Master of Arts in Teaching Program ESOL Endorsement and/or Middle and High School Education Program Winter 2014

Adam David Roth MESSAGE FROM THE BASIC COURSE DIRECTOR. Dear students:

Business Communication COMM 332

PHIL 1103 LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING (Online w/on-campus Tests) Syllabus and Schedule

St. Luke s Hospital School of Nursing at Moravian College Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Nursing 115A: Foundations of Nursing and Healthcare Fall 2011

TECM 3200: Web Design and Development University of North Texas Technical Communication Spring 2015

Psychology 318, Thinking and Decision Making Course Syllabus, Spring 2015 TR 8-9:20 in Lago W262

F l o r i d a G u l f C o a s t U n i v e r s i t y S t a t i s t i c a l M e t h o d s F a l l C R N

English 273 XXX Technical and Scientific Writing SAMPLE SYLLABUS Department of English, SFASU

FIN 301 SYLLABUS Corporate Finance Spring 2012

LANGARA COLLEGE Course Outline

ENGL-101 ENGLISH COMPOSITION I

ACCT 3103 Intermediate Accounting I Oklahoma State University Spring 2015

BPA434: ADVANCED TOPICS IN CORPORATE FINANCE COURSE OUTLINE

FYS Life Maps JACKSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1/10 through 2/23/2012 WINTER 2012

EPI 820/CPH504: Epidemiology in Public Health (Online)

CRJU Introduction to Criminal Justice (CRN 20933) Course Syllabus Spring 2015

PHIL 2244: Engineering Ethics (3 credits)

JOUR 340 Online Journalism

AEC 3073 INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION Ms. Mary Rodriguez

INTRODUCTION TO SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT 103 (52356) 3 semester credits Summer Semester 2014

Tennessee Wesleyan College Math 131 C Syllabus Spring 2016

SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM SYLLABUS CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE CRJ 445

PHIL 1103 LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING (Online w/on-campus Tests) Syllabus and Schedule

Elmira Business Institute Medical Transcription I (OFF 131)

COURSE OBJECTIVES AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Likewise, we have contradictions: formulas that can only be false, e.g. (p p).

SYLLABUS Human Resource Management MGMT 3241 Section 001 Spring 2006, MW 3:00-4:20 Friday 9

BC 201 Introduction to Radio/TV/Internet (Credit Hours: 3.00)

MATH 140 HYBRID INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS COURSE SYLLABUS

CAS 464/464-L: Advanced Practicum in Early Childhood

BUSSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION COMM GRADING USING THE FOLLOWING VALUES Attendance Classroom & Discussion board participation

ACC201: Introduction to Financial Accounting 1 Section 006: TR, pm, in CR115 Section 007: TR, pm, in BUSAD A101

MGT 367 Human Resource Management Spring 2015 Online

CREATING LEARNING OUTCOMES

Cleveland State University NAL/PAD/PDD/UST 504 Section 51 Levin College of Urban Affairs Fall, 2009 W 6 to 9:50 pm UR 108

The University of Hong Kong Faculty of Business and Economics School of Business

How To Pass A Financial Analysis Course

MGMT 3241: Introduction to Human Resource Management Syllabus Instructor: Katherine A. Frear Second Summer 2012

Writing learning objectives

INFO & 090 Business Data Communications and Information Security Fall 2014

LINCOLN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURIAL STUDIES COURSE SYLLABUS

Psychology 420 (Sections 101 and 102) Experimental Psychology: Social Psychology Laboratory

Required Textbook: Sciarra, Dorothy June, Dorsey, Anne G., Developing and Administering a Child Care and Education Program, 7th Edition.

WRITING SKILLS Course Syllabus

COURSE INFORMATION AND SYLLABUS

Fall, Alternating: Friday, 11 am - 2 pm Tuesday, 11 am - 1 pm. Location, NB. Advance confirmation always preferred;

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR HMSY 1470 FINAL PROJECT IN HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Semester Hours Credit: 3

COURSE SYLLABUS FIREWALLS & NETWORK SECURITY. ITSY-2301 Number Lecture - Lab - Credit. ITSY-1342 Prerequisites. April 16, 2015 Revision Date

Introduction to General Psychology Spring 2014 PSY , Mon. & Wed.: 6-7:15

COMMUNICATION & JOURNALISM PUBLIC SPEAKING SECTION 021 COURSE SYLLABUS

Other Requirements: USB drive, Internet Access and a campus address.

Mary Baldwin College Social Work SOWK 317L WA Social Work Research Fall 2015

REQUIRED TEXT: Slavin, R. E. Educational Psychology, Ninth Edition. Allyn and Bacon, 2009.

Liberal Arts Mathematics (MA), Summer 2015

HIST 2112 U.S. History Survey 1865 to the Present Kennesaw State University Summer 2013

Alabama Department of Postsecondary Education. Representing The Alabama Community College System

BSCI222 Principles of Genetics Winter 2014 TENTATIVE

BUS 3525 Strategic Management Online

TOPICS: EVENT PLANNING AND COMMUNICATION COM 315V-2X- Tuesdays from 4:00 6:30 p.m. Fall Term, 2011

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS PROJECT SCHEDULING W/LAB ENGT 2021

AAF Ad Campaign I MCM Name: Dr. Linda Bond lbond@sfasu.edu Phone: Office: Boynton 301

MGMT /004: THE ETHICAL, POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT FOR BUSINESS. SYLLABUS Spring 2016

Transcription:

PHILOSOPHY 101: CRITICAL THINKING [days and times] [classroom] [semester] 20YY, [campus] [instructor s name] [office hours: days and times] [instructor s e-mail] COURSE OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES 1. Identify and define the major concepts included in reasoning 2. Identify and define major types of reasoning 3. Translate arguments in language into their correct logical symbolic form 4. Assess validity, soundness or credibility of arguments by appropriate tests 5. Know the various fallacies connected with bad arguments 6. Apply the general rules and guidelines for correct thinking to concrete instances of reasoning in speech and writing 7. Recognize major types of informal fallacies A. Subgoals Specific to the Mathematical Strategies Rubric (full coverage) for General Education: 1. Identify and extract propositions or arguments from their linguistic contexts (Exemplifies element A.1: finds the necessary information) 2. Translate propositions or arguments into their correct logical formats (Exemplifies element A.2: makes a plan to solve a problem) 3. Determine strategy and step-by-step procedures to be used in assessing the truth-value of truthfunctional expressions or the validity of arguments. (Exemplifies elements B.1 and B.2: performs a calculation/checks answers for accuracy) 4. Justify and explain steps in proofs or tests by citing procedures, argument-forms equivalences, etc. that are used (Exemplifies element C.1.: explains the steps taken) 5. Name the procedures, argument-forms or equivalences used in each step. (Exemplifies element C.2.: articulates the solution) 6. Clearly format proofs or decision procedures (such as Venn diagrams, inference-strings, truthtable assignments, etc.) for ease of understanding. (Exemplifies element C.3: presents the problem and solution clearly and concisely) B. Subgoals Specific to the Humanities Rubric (full coverage) for General Education: 1. Define argument, proposition, premise, conclusion, validity vs. truth, induction, deduction, quality, quantity, etc. (Exemplifies first humanities element: identify facts, vocabulary, definitions terms and concepts 2. Know those concepts relevant to the tasks of formulating and/or determining validity of deductive and inductive inferences (Exemplifies second humanities element: recognizes concepts or tools relevant to application of a task) 3. Test arguments for validity by applying: axioms on the square of opposition, converse-obverse 1

derivatives, syllogistic axioms, Venn diagrams and/or various truth-table tests, natural deduction and rules of credible generalization. (Exemplifies fifth humanities element: analysis: applies concepts to address the task) 4. Breaks down arguments into premises and conclusions to determine soundness and/or joins facts to form pieces of evidence to enhance credibility of conclusions. (Exemplifies sixth humanities element: deconstructs arguments by indicating claims and/or evidence and synthesizes evidence from multiple sources) 5. Correctly assess the strengths and weaknesses of the basic types of deductive and inductive arguments by considering both truth-factor and support-factor (Exemplifies seventh humanities element: evaluates support for claims and justifies conclusions) OUTLINE OF COURSE I. Introduction: Critical Thinking and Reasoning A. Logic and Philosophy B. Thought and Reasoning C. Premises vs. Conclusions D. Arguments vs. Non Arguments E. Deduction vs. Induction F. Truth vs. Validity G. Diagramming Arguments In-class exercises: p. 9 11, 1-10; p. 46 47, 2 10; p. 48-49, 2 10. Readings: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 2.2 Outcomes. Able to recognize arguments, tell inductive from deductive arguments, distinguish premises and conclusions, and correctly diagram arguments by analyzing them [A.1, A.2, B.1, B.2]. Quiz on Unit I II. The Logic of Statements A. Categorical Propositions and Classes B. Quality, Quantity, and Distribution C. Standard Form D. The Square of Opposition E. Existential Import and Difficulties with the Square F. Further Immediate Inferences In-class exercises: p.74, 1 10; p. 79 80, 1 10; p. 84, 1 4; p. 90 92, A, B, D, E, F; p. 107, 2 20. Readings: 3.1 through 3.8 Outcomes: Able to recognize, translate into standard form and test immediate inferences: [A.2-A.6, B.2, B.3] Practice Quiz on Unit II 2

Quiz on Unit II III. The Syllogism A. Mediate vs. Immediate Inference B. The Form of the Syllogism Figure and Mood C. Venn Diagrams D. Rules and Fallacies E. Critique of the Syllogism In-class exercises: p.174, 2 10; p. 177, 2 10; p.187 188,1 10; p. 195 198, A, B, C. Readings: 5.1 through 5.4. Outcomes: Able to recognize mediate inferences (syllogisms), to translate them into correct logical symbolic form and test them for validity by general rules and the Venn diagram technique [A.2-A.6, B.3-B.5] Trial Quiz on Unit III Quiz on Unit III IV. Variations and Extensions of the Syllogism A. Problems of Translating into Standard Form B. Enthymemes and Soriteses C. Disjunctive and Hypothetical Syllogisms D. Dilemmas In-class exercises: p. 235 236, 1 20; p. 244 245, 2 14. Readings: 6.3, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7 Outcomes: Able to recognize variations on the syllogism such as enthymemes and soriteses, to translate them into standard logical form in symbols and to test them for validity. Able to introduce truth-functional arguments: (e.g., disjunctive and hypothetical syllogisms, the dilemma) and translate them into standard logical form and test them for validity, to deconstruct soriteses into their member syllogisms: [A.1-A.5, B.1, B.2, B.4, B.5] Trial Quiz on Unit IV Quiz on Unit IV V. Symbolic Logic A. Notation and Punctuation B. Propositions vs. Propositional Functions C. Translating from Language to Symbols D. Arguments and Argument Forms E. Truth-Functions and Truth-Tables In-class exercises: p 273 276 A, 1 10; B, C; p 284 286 A, B Readings: 7.1 7.5 3

Quiz on Unit V, Sections A-E F. The Paradoxes of Material Implication G. Tests for Validity H. Reduction to a Single Function I. The Three Laws of Thought In-class exercises: p. 298 299, B, C Readings: 7.6 7.10 Outcomes: Able to recognize, correctly translate and test arguments involving compound propositions. Know and apply the various truth-table tests for validity [A.2-A.6, B.2, B.3, B.5] Quiz on Unit V, Sections F I VI. Formal Proofs A. The Idea of Natural Deduction B. Strategies for Natural Deduction C. Rules of Replacement and Equivalent Expressions D. Practice in Natural Deduction E. Indirect and Conditional Proof In-class exercises: p. 339-342, B, 1 6, C, 1 7; p. 356 A, 1 4; p. 366, E, 1 6; p. 366 368, F, 1 19. Readings: 8.1 through 8.8 Outcomes: to deduce conclusions from premises in truth-functional arguments step-by-step by use of elementary argument forms and equivalences. To weigh and adopt strategies for such natural deduction [A.2-A.6, B.2, B.3, B.5] Quiz on Unit VI. VII. Fallacies A. Fallacies of Relevance B. Fallacies of Defective Induction C. Fallacies of Presumption D. Fallacies of Ambiguity In-class exercises: p.127 128, 1 10; p.144 145, 18; p.154 155, 1 10. Readings: 4.1 through 4.6 Outcomes: Able to describe and discuss nineteen types of fallacy in ordinary language and recognize instances of each type [A.1, A.2, B.2-B.4] Quiz on Unit VII 4

VIII. Inductive Logic A. Cause, Effect, and Uniformity B. Simple Enumeration C the problem of induction D Mill s methods and their limitations E the method of hypothesis F hypothesis formation and testing In-class exercises: p. 406-410, 1-7; p. 411-413, 1-5; p. 420-422, 1-7. Readings: 9.1 9.4, p.391 423 Outcomes: Able to define, recognize, criticize and formulate each one of Mill s five methods; to know how to recognize, form and test hypotheses; to understand the problem of verification and falsification of hypotheses, to understand the philosophical problem of induction [A.1, A.2. B.3, B.4] Quiz on Unit VIII FINAL EXAM [date and time] 5

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION QUIZZES There will be a total of 6 ANNOUNCED quizzes on the Units on the syllabus. In addition, there will be 3 UNANNOUNCED quizzes at any time. IT IS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO TAKE ALL THE QUIZZES, both announced and unannounced. The reason is that if you take MORE than 7 quizzes, only your 7 best ones are counted. However, if you take FEWER than 7 quizzes, your average quiz score will be adversely affected, because your quiz grade average will be determined by dividing the sum of your quiz scores by 7. Students with documentation from disability services and students with documentation who are involved in a university sponsored event on the day of a quiz must make arrangements with me at least one week BEFORE the scheduled quiz in order to be able to take a make-up quiz. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO MAKE UP QUIZZES WILL BE ADMINISTERED WITHOUT AN OFFICIAL, LEGITIMATE AND SIGNED EXCUSE. SEEKING HELP SOON Any student who has difficulty understanding course material should immediately seek help. Please do not hesitate and please feel free to see me after class or during my office hours if you have questions about or difficulty with the subject matter. Please make a special appointment to see me if you cannot make it during my office hours. BASIC QUESTIONS ON THE ASSIGNED READING Each student must pass in NO LATER THAN THE LAST CLASS DAY his/her answers to the basic questions on the reading. These questions are taken from the assigned chapters and will be distributed at the beginning of the semester. FINAL EXAM There will be a final exam on the date indicated on the syllabus. EXCEPT IN CASES OF AN EXAM CONFLICT, NO PERMISSION WILL BE GRANTED TO TAKE THE FINAL EXAM AT ANY OTHER TIME OR DATE THAN THE SCHEDULED TIME AND DATE WITHOUT A LEGITIMATE EXCUSE. (The purchase of a plane, train, or bus ticket for a date or time prior to or on the same date as the final exam is not a legitimate excuse. Do not ask for an exception for that reason. It will not be granted.) GRADING The average of your best 7 quiz grades counts for 50% of your final grade for the course; the final exam counts for 25%, and your answers to the list of basic questions on the reading counts for the remaining 25% of your grade for the course. ATTENDANCE Attendance will be taken every class meeting. It is expected and important for success in this course both to attend every class and to arrive on time. It is not accidental that those who failed this course almost always had poor attendance. UNLESS a written, signed, legitimate and official excuse is handed in within one week of a missed class, THE ABSENCE WILL BE RECORDED AS AN UNEXCUSED ABSENCE. TEN OR MORE UNEXCUSED ABSENCES MEANS AN AUTOMATIC FAILURE OF THE COURSE. 6

ACADEMIC HONESTY Students are expected to be honest in all academic work. A student s name on any written work, quiz, or exam shall be regarded as assurance that the work is the result of the student s own independent thought and study. Work should be stated in the student s own words, properly attributed to its source. Students have an obligation to know how to quote, paraphrase, summarize, cite and reference the work of others with integrity. Examples of academic dishonesty include: Using material directly or paraphrasing, from published sources (print or electronic) without appropriate citation. Claiming disproportionate credit for work not done independently. Unauthorized possession or access to exams Unauthorized communication during quizzes or exams Unauthorized use of another s work or preparing work for another student Taking an exam for another student Altering or attempting to alter grades The use of electronic devices to gain an unauthorized advantage during exams Fabricating or falsifying facts, data or references Facilitating or aiding another s dishonesty Submitting the same paper for more than one course without prior approval from the instructors. During all quizzes and exams all notes, books, computers and electronic devices should be closed and placed on the floor SPECIAL SERVICES A) Disability Services Any student with a documented disability should contact me as early as possible in the semester so that we might arrange reasonable accommodations. As part of this process, please be in touch with disability Services for Students office at 330 memorial Union, 401 874 2098 B) Academic Services In addition to getting help from me, students having difficulty keeping pace with the work or understanding course concepts are encouraged to take advantage of help provided by the Academic Enhancement Center on the fourth floor of Roosevelt (874-2367). 7