IHS Study on the Economic Impact of Proposed Restrictions on Tax Exempt Bonds for Nonprofit Organizations

Similar documents
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WASHINGTON HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES AUTHORITY

The Economic Benefits of Oil and Natural Gas Production: An Analysis of Effects on the United States and Major Energy Producing States

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

Eli Lilly. and Company. in Indiana

On March 11, 2010, President Barack

The Economic Impact of Fire Damage on Wyoming s Economy from a Business Perspective

National Heavy Duty Truck Transportation Efficiency Macroeconomic Impact Analysis

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy and Power: Quadrennial Energy Review and Related Discussion Drafts, including Title III

City of Beverly. Impact ECONOMIC STUDY. conducted for ENDICOTT RESEARCH CENTER ENDICOTT COLLEGE BEVERLY, MASSACHUSETTS

Economic Contributions of Pacific Gas and Electric Company

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of Dallas County, Iowa a. Daniel Otto and Georgeanne Artz b

The Negative Employment Impacts of the Medicare Cuts in the Budget Control Act of September 2012

Serving the Community Well:

Transportation Infrastructure Investment: Macroeconomic and Industry Contribution of the Federal Highway and Mass Transit Program

An Economic Impact Analysis.

Global Sector. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Global Direct GDP. Global GDP Impact by Industry

The Economic Impacts of Business Energy Tax Credit Supported Manufacturing in Oregon 2012 Update

HR TRENDS AND INSIGHTS: FALLING OIL PRICES AND DECREASED INDUSTRY SPENDING - EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS

Prepared for: The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Prepared by: Ziona Austrian, Ph.D. Candice Clouse, M.S. Iryna Lendel, Ph.D.

DEMONSTRATING ECONOMIC

LIST OF MAJOR LEADING & LAGGING ECONOMIC INDICATORS

The Economic Impact of Replacing Coal with Natural Gas for Electricity Production. William A. Knudson. Working Paper

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

THE INVISIBLE ENGINE:

Brazil. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. Brazil GDP Impact by Industry. Brazil GDP Impact by Industry

A Labour Economic Profile of New Brunswick

Economic Impact Analysis of School Facility Construction

WM RECYCLE AMERICA, L.L.C.

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF

Final Report. Measuring the Economic Impact of Improved Electricity Distribution in Connecticut. Prepared by Regional Economic Models, Inc.

May The economic impact of the UK Maritime Services Sector: Business Services

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in New Orleans

The impact on the UK economy of a reduction in fuel duty

An Economic Impact Analysis of Entergy Operations in Mississippi

West Piedmont Workforce Investment Network (WIA) And Career Training

The Economic Impacts of Reducing. Natural Gas and Electricity Use in Ontario

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Ohio. May 2011

NOV The ECONOMIC VALUE of IDAHO PUBLIC COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

Russia. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. Russia GDP Impact by Industry. Russia GDP Impact by Industry

PRINEVILLE DATA CENTER

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Prioritization: Responding to Regional and National Trends and Demands Jeremy Sage

IHS Global Economic and Financial Data

Global Sector. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Global Direct GDP. Global GDP Impact by Industry

Oklahoma Economic Outlook 2015

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax Reductions in North Carolina

Economic Contribution of Telecommunication Companies Serving Greater Minnesota

SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF

11th National Convention on Statistics (NCS) EDSA Shangri-La Hotel October 4-5, 2010

The Economic Value of the Northport-East Northport Public Library In Suffolk County, New York

MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH CHAPTER

Economic Impact of The Charleston International Airport Complex

CHAPTER 5: MEASURING GDP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Walmart reports Q1 FY 16 EPS of $1.03

Women Business Owners Create Jobs and Income - A Review

Introduction. Introduction, Contd. Introduction, Contd.

Colorado Employment Outlook Summary

The Economic Impact of Commercial Airports in 2010

The Economic Impact of the New Hospital on the Economy of Drumright, Creek County, Oklahoma

Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 1

A Lee County Economic Impact Study Prepared for

HOSPITAL INDUSTRY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

Details and Analysis of Senator Bernie Sanders s Tax Plan

The economic impact of Winona State University

CAN WE AFFORD NOT TO INVEST IN BUSINESS TRAVEL?

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

STATE OF ARKANSAS Department of Finance and Administration

Econ 116 Mid-Term Exam

The Economic Impact of Health Services on the Economy of Sumter County, Alabama

Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy

Economic Consequences of Building the Black Hills Energy Power Plant in Pueblo County with a Project Labor Agreement

The transfer between levels of hierarchy (i.e., from Level 2 to Level 1) in 2010 was due to the listing of the SMC shares in December 2010.

In order to maintain its position as a global economic leader and

Economic Impact of the September 11 World Trade Center Attack

Table of Comparative Provisions of Tax Credit Bonds Provisions Under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Build America Bonds (Direct Payment)

70% Fuel for HR Careers

Economic Impact Analysis of PSE&G s Capital Expenditure Program

The impact on superannuation fund balances from the new compulsory superannuation rate

Estimated Economic Impact of Gulf Oil Spill on Virginia s Oyster Industry July 2010

This release of the Bureau of Labor

planning market analysis & site location services Economic Impact Analysis:

Tools for Understanding Economic Change in Communities: Economic Base Analysis and Shift-Share Analysis

STABILITY PROGRAMME

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

Seattle, WA Assisted Living Facility

The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Westwood LargeCap Value Fund. Summary Prospectus March 1, 2015 Ticker: Institutional Shares WHGLX

The Unconventional Energy Revolution: Estimated Energy Savings for Public School Districts and State and Local Governments

Q UANTITATIVE E CONOMICS & S TATISTICS AUGUST 25, Virginia Taxes Paid by Manufacturers

OSC EXEMPT MARKET REVIEW OSC NOTICE APPENDIX C CAPITAL RAISING IN CANADA AND THE ONTARIO EXEMPT MARKET

The Health Care Industry and La Crosse County: Will Medicaid and BadgerCare Budget Reduction Impact the Local Economy?

THE MANUFACTURING VALUE CHAIN Is Much Bigger Than You Think!

The Economic Contribution of the Oil and Gas Industry In Kern County

Estimating the Effects of Spending

Multi-Layer Packet-Optical: The Path to Efficient Networks

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland

Background on the Economic Impact Methodology Used in the Analysis

Chapter 11 Macroeconomic Assessment of Action Plan

The economic impact of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

The long-term projections of federal revenues and

Transcription:

IHS Study on the Economic Impact of Proposed Restrictions on Tax Exempt Bonds for Nonprofit Organizations Prepared For: Submitted By: IHS Global Inc. 15 Inverness Way East Englewood, CO 80112 October 2013

CONTACT INFORMATION JIM DIFFLEY Senior Director and Chief Economist, IHS US Regional Services IHS Global Inc. 1650 Arch Street Suite 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Tel: 215-789-7422 Email: jim.diffley@ihs.com IHS 1

Tax-exempt bonds provide a critical source of capital investment funding for nonprofits. According to data from Thomson Reuters and other sources, from 2003 to 2012 501(c)(3) bonds totaled $450-billion in financing through public offerings and private placements, largely sourced to health care and education projects. Private placement issuance is estimated to add 23% to the public offering total (this figure is derived from a sampling among a selection of state non-profit issuers). The federal tax savings awarded to investors allows nonprofits to sell bonds at lower interest rates. If a 28-percent benefit cap on tax exempt interest had been in place for projects financed over the last decade, it would have cost nonprofits an additional $58.2 billion in interest expenses (an average of $5.8 billion per year). Interest expenses would balloon to $166.3 billion, or $16 billion per year, under a complete elimination of the tax exemption. These additional costs would profoundly impact nonprofits ability to fund new projects. There would be wide ranging economic effects if nonprofits reduced their capital expenditures. For the scope of this study, it is assumed that nonprofits reduce their spending by the extra interest costs that would have been incurred if 501(c)(3) financing was reduced or eliminated altogether. These potential impacts are modeled using IMPLAN's economic impact software, which uses national inter-industry purchasing relationships to study changes on regional economic activity resulting from direct expenditures on goods and services. When a direct change in regional spending occurs, indirect and induced impacts are generated through the supply chain linkages and consumer spending that result from fulfillment and completion of the activity. In this study, the economic impacts can be considered understated because they only account for the activity generated from capital projects themselves and not the long-term economic value added by the new/renovated hospitals, schools, and all other projects financed through tax exempt bonds. We find that 18,000 jobs are created from each billion dollars of financed capital spending. The study is framed as a look back at the bond financing supported over the 2002-2012 period. Two scenarios were analyzed: first, a 28-percent benefit cap on tax exempt interest assumes a decrease in capital spending of $5.8 billion, or the annual average of the $58.2 billion of estimated extra borrowing costs. The second scenario is a reduction of capital spending of $16.6 billion per year under the assumption that the tax exemption was eliminated entirely. The mix of infrastructure spending is patterned following the broad spending category distribution of the $554-billion in 501(c)(3) projects financed over 2003-2012. Chart 1 illustrates the economic losses which would have occurred in 2012 if the interest exemption had been eliminated for that year. Alternatively the chart illustrates the economic gains of the exemption for 2012. Going forward the chart indicates the approximate annual losses which would result upon repeal. IHS 2

Chart 1 Overall Impacts in 2012 (Jobs, Million $) 28% Cap Full Repeal Direct Total Direct Total Employment 41,134 104,651 117,526 299,003 Output 5,819 16,060 16,627 45,885 Gross Domestic Product 2,650 8,256 7,570 23,590 Labor Income 2,154 5,483 6,153 15,664 State/Local Taxes 603 1,723 Federal Taxes 1,146 3,275 IMPACTS BY SECTOR In addition to the broad economic impacts described above, we can analyze the distribution of those annual impacts across the various sectors of the economy. Chart 2 Employment Impacts By Industry (Jobs) INDUSTRY 28% Cap Full Repeal TOTAL 104,651 299,003 Construction 41,758 119,309 Professional & Business Services 12,131 34,661 Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 11,919 34,055 Manufacturing 8,395 23,986 Education & Health Services 8,144 23,268 Financial Services 7,895 22,558 Leisure & Hospitality Services 6,475 18,500 Other Services 4,308 12,309 Information Services 1,229 3,512 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 1,173 3,353 Government 729 2,084 Natural Resources & Mining 493 1,409 The construction sector is the top beneficiary of capital dollars and thus jobs, but many other sectors benefit as the spending flows through the economy as a whole. Through the multiplier effect, most sectors of the economy are affected as the spending put towards capital projects has positive ripple effects on other industries. The construction sector is the top sector directly impacted, while the professional and business services and manufacturing sectors benefit the most indirectly. Jobs that are induced as a result IHS 3

of higher incomes stemming from direct/indirect employment gains are far-reaching, however the greatest number are in the trade, transportation and utilities and education and health services sector. Charts 3 and 4 summarize the annual indirect and induced job losses for both the 28% and full repeal scenarios per sector. The $5.8 billion loss in capital spending would have resulted in over 7,696 fewer indirect jobs in the professional and business services sector (Chart 3). Further, the $16.6 billion in spending would have resulted in over 21,989 jobs lost in this sector (Chart 4). These services, such as architectural and engineering, accounting and tax preparation, and legal services, are used for the planning and implementation of capital projects and are all indirectly tied to capital spending. The direct and indirect jobs supported by capital spending provides further stimulus through the increase in wages flowing through the economy. These induced impacts affected the trade, transportation and utilities, and education and health services sectors the most. A $5.8 billion shock in capital spending is associated with over 8,132 jobs in the education and health services sector, while $16.6 billion contributes to nearly 23,234 jobs. Many of these induced jobs are in private hospitals and the offices of physicians, dentists and health practitioners as employees seek out general healthcare services. Private colleges, universities, and trade schools also are affected as with new economic growth comes a demand for educational services. The trade, transportation, and utilities sector meanwhile could see over 8,800 induced jobs lost due to a $5.8 billion reduction and over 25,143 jobs with a $16.6 billion cut. Retail stores and wholesale trade businesses are greatly impacted by the changes in disposable income that result from fluctuations in employment due to spending cuts in other areas of the economy. Chart 3 28% Exemption Cap Industry Total Direct Indirect Induced Construction 41,758 41,134 279 345 Professional & Business Services 12,131-7,696 4,435 Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 11,919-3,119 8,800 Manufacturing 8,395-6,547 1,848 Education & Health Services 8,144-12 8,132 Financial Services 7,895-2,170 5,725 Leisure & Hospitality Services 6,475-1,219 5,255 Other Services 4,308-1,002 3,306 Information Services 1,229-484 745 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 1,173-327 846 Government 729-195 534 Natural Resources & Mining 493-299 194 IHS 4

Chart 4 Full Repeal Industry Total Direct Indirect Induced Construction 119,309 117,526 798 985 Professional & Business Services 34,661-21,989 12,673 Trade, Transportation, & Utilities 34,055-8,912 25,143 Manufacturing 23,986-18,705 5,281 Education & Health Services 23,268-34 23,234 Financial Services 22,558-6,199 16,358 Leisure & Hospitality Services 18,500-3,484 15,016 Other Services 12,309-2,863 9,446 Information Services 3,512-1,384 2,129 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 3,353-935 2,418 Government 2,084-557 1,527 Natural Resources & Mining 1,409-854 555 IHS 5

ABOUT IHS (WWW.IHS.COM) IHS (NYSE: IHS) is the leading source of information, insight and analytics in critical areas that shape today s business landscape. Businesses and governments in more than 165 countries around the globe rely on the comprehensive content, expert independent analysis and flexible delivery methods of IHS to make high-impact decisions and develop strategies with speed and confidence. IHS has been in business since 1959 and became a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange in 2005. Headquartered in Englewood, Colorado, USA, IHS is committed to sustainable, profitable growth and employs approximately 8,000 people in 31 countries around the world. IHS 6

BIOGRAPHY Contributing to this report are researchers Karl Kuykendall, Senior Economist and Charlie Dougherty, Economist as well as IHS Chief Economist of US Regional Services, Jim Diffley. Mr. Diffley s biography is provided below. James Diffley is Vice President and Chief Economist of IHS Global Inc. s U.S. Regional Services, with overall responsibility for US Regional Services, including the Regional Core Macroeconomic Service and the IHS Real Estate and Construction Service. Since 1998, Mr. Diffley has supervised the quarterly economic forecast of the 50 states and over 300 metropolitan areas of the United States. He regularly makes presentations of these regional economic forecasts and analysis to clients, conferences, governmental bodies, and the press. Mr. Diffley is also responsible for customized consulting projects. These have included long-term projections of cigarette consumption, forecasts of capital gains realizations, analysis of the economic impact of the securities industry on New York State, analysis of the impact of changing oil prices on local economies, and the economic impact of various facilities locations. Mr. Diffley holds a BA in Mathematics and Economics from State University of New York at Buffalo, and an MA in Economics from State University of New York at Stony Brook. IHS 7