Innovative Courageous Structure Compassion Leadership. Criminal Justice Reform

Families Veterans Mothers Redemption Transformation Recovery Teamwork Innovative Courageous Structure Compassion Leadership Criminal Justice Reform PIONEERING Accountability Evidence-Based Successful Historic Community Trailblazing Healthy Reducing Crime Saving Lives Saving Money Drug-Free Babies Accountability EVIDENCE-BASED Pioneering Innovative Leadership Saving Lives ALL RISE Clean and SOBER Reducing Crime Transformation Compassion Healthy Veterans NADCP 20th Annual Training Conference Anaheim, CA May 28-31, 2014

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Happy 25th Anniversary Drug Courts! Twenty five years ago in Miami-Dade County, Florida, a combination of ingenuity, creativity, and collaboration mixed with a stubborn resolve that would no longer accept a broken justice system for the addicted and mentally-ill. The result was Drug Court, and no other innovation in social justice can claim a greater impact. Since then, communities all across the U.S. and around the globe have confronted the outcomes of those being released from juvenile detention centers, jails and prison, and those who had no hope at regaining custody of their children in the traditional family court system. In doing so, you refused to turn a blind eye to the fact that too many untreated drug, alcohol and mentally-ill offenders were not getting the help they needed to get their lives restored and families back. Today, over 2,840 Drug Courts are in operation in all fifty states and U.S. territories, successfully treating 142,000 drug-addicted individuals a year. After 25 years, Drug Courts have saved over 1.3 million lives and billions of tax dollars, forever changing the course of a predominate lock em up philosophy in America and proving once and for all that treatment does work when accompanied by accountability. Due in large part to the extraordinary success of Drug Courts, after four decades of escalating prison populations, the rate of incarceration in the U.S. has dropped three consecutive years! And, it s estimated that 17 States are now expected to lower prisoner populations and save billions through innovative justice reforms including significant Drug Court expansion. This week, special guests from the worlds of government and entertainment will help us celebrate Drug Court s past and future. But don t lose sight of one fact you are the future of Drug Court. This historic conference celebrates you the people who work tirelessly to unencumber so many from the weight of addiction. Over the last two and a half decades, Drug Court practitioners have made a profound impact on so many and forever changed the face of the justice system in the United States and around the world. Thank you and congratulations! Enjoy the conference! Sincerely, West Huddleston CEO

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Acknowledgements Many thanks to our federal partners for their ongoing efforts and support of Drug Courts and other Problem-Solving Courts throughout the nation: Additional thanks to our other partners whose efforts contribute to this conference: The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators at HHS-sponsored conferences do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of Justice; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Corporate Members Many thanks to the NADCP Corporate members The NADCP Corporate Members give generously to support our efforts on behalf of Drug Courts, DWI Courts, and Veterans Treatment Courts everywhere. CHAMPION MEMBER PIONEER MEMBERS GOLD MEMBERS SILVER MEMBERS BRONZE MEMBERS 2 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Table of Contents NADCP Staff... 4 NADCP Board of Directors... 5 Discipline Specific Breakouts... 6 Stanley M. Goldstein Hall of Fame... 8 State Associations and other Meetings... 9 Drug Court Expo Schedule... 10 Featured Guests... 11 Conference At-A-Glance... 13 Training Track Descriptions... 23 Wednesday Schedule... 29 Thursday Schedule... 49 Friday Schedule... 101 Saturday Schedule... 121 Drug Court Expo... 131 Exhibitor Listing... 132 Convention Center Floor Plan... 143 Session Tables... 153 NADCP welcomes the diversity of methods and opinions shared through the interactive format of this conference. NADCP does not necessarily endorse all of the viewpoints expressed. 3

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Staff Joyce Barrow Project Director Percy Brooks Registrar Jennifer Columbel Senior Director, Public Policy Vanessa Cunningham Research Coordinator Kristen Deutsch Director of Development Chris Deutsch Director of Communications Melissa Fitzgerald Senior Director, Justice For Vets Carson Fox Chief Operating Officer Bonnie Greenslade Training Coordinator Ingrid Gutierrez Training Coordinator Carolyn Hardin Senior Director National Drug Court Institute Sonya Harper Project Director Ashley Harron Associate Chief of Science, Law and Policy West Huddleston Chief Executive Officer Clifford Jacobs Training Coordinator Hon. J. Michael Kavanaugh Senior Director National Center for DWI Courts Jennifer Lubold Director of Conferences Douglas Marlowe, Ph.D., J.D. Chief of Science, Law and Policy Janet McCuller Chief Financial Officer Meisha Moody Office Manager Jontelle Niblock Accounting Technician Brittney Parks Communications Coordinator Rhonda Pence Public Relations Manager Mike Soussi-Tanani Associate Director of Conferences Frank Stewart Special Assistant to the CEO Scott Swain Project Director Clyde J. (Butch) Tate II Major General, US Army (Retired) Senior Fellow for Veteran Legal Affairs Tonya Voelker Assoc. Director of Legislative Affairs Iesha Ward Receptionist RESOURCE CONSULTANTS Hon. Jeri Beth Cohen Senior Judicial Fellow Hon. William G. Meyer (ret.) Senior Judicial Fellow Former Congressman Jim Ramstad Senior Policy Analyst The NADCP, NCDC, NDCI, and Justice for Vets staff provide technical assistance and training, host this annual training conference, provide advocacy, sponsor research, disseminate information and provide a number of other services to the field throughout the year. We are indebted to our staff for all their hard work. NADCP PROMISE STATEMENT: To champion proven strategies within the judicial system that empower drug-using offenders to change their lives. NADCP MISSION STATEMENT: We will not rest until there are Drug Courts and other Problem-Solving Courts within reach of every person in need. 4 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Board of Directors Hon. Jeff Bagley Cumming, GA Hon. Michael Barrasse Scranton, PA Hon. Rogelio Flores Santa Maria, CA Hon. Richard Gebelein Wilmington, DE Hon. Pamela Gray Washington, DC Hon. Bob Helfrich Hattiesburg, MS Scott Henggeler, Ph.D. Charleston, SC Domingo Herraiz Washington, DC Earl Hightower Studio City, CA Mary Kay Hudson Indianapolis, IN Mack Jenkins San Diego, CA Chief Russell B. Laine Algonquin, IL Hon. Leonia J. Lloyd Detroit, MI Hon. Stephen Manley San Jose, CA General Barry R. McCaffrey (USA Ret.) Seattle, WA Connie Payne Frankfort, KY Hon. Louis Presenza (Emeritus) Philadelphia, PA Hon. Robert Rancourt Center City, MN Hon. Ruben Reyes Lubbock, TX Lynn Richardson Dallas, TX Charles R. Robinson Austin, TX Hon. Robert Russell (Emeritus) Buffalo, NY Hon. John R. Schwartz (Emeritus) Rochester, NY Hon. Chuck Simmons Greenville, SC Hon. Keith Starrett (Chair) Hattiesburg, MS Hon. Jeff Tauber (Emeritus) Albany, CA The NADCP Board of Directors works tirelessly on behalf of the Drug Court field. These individuals give generously of their time, energy, and expertise throughout the year to ensure we move towards our goal of putting a Drug Court within reach of every American in need. Please take the opportunity to thank your Board members for their dedication! 5

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Discipline Specific Breakouts Anaheim Convention Center Want to know what sessions you should attend? Have questions about the conference agenda? Need to discuss burning issues impacting your program? This year s discipline-specific sessions are for you!! This year s conference includes opportunities for disciplines to meet and resolve burning issues and critical questions. Starting on Wednesday morning at 7:30 am, enjoy continental breakfast in the Marriott Ballroom Foyer or the Anaheim Convention Center Level 2 Foyer and report to the breakout designated for your discipline. An expert practitioner who shares your role on the team will facilitate the breakout. The facilitator will review the conference program, identify sessions specifically designed for your role on the team, and lead discussion to address your burning issues. Then, on Saturday, May 31, from 8:00-9:15 am, the discipline-specific groups will reconvene to further triage burning issues, and your facilitator will continue to suggest additional resources, so you can make the most from your conference experience! Plus, by attending the discipline breakouts, you will have the opportunity to meet other conference attendees who share your role in the Drug Court or other Problem-Solving Court! Wednesday, May 28 7:30 A.M. 8:45 A.M. Speaker Room DSB-1 Treatment Providers Adults Terrence Walton 201A/B DSB-2 Administrators/Coordinators Michael Princevalli 201C/D DSB-3 Judges/Adult and Federal Hon. Peggy Davis 202A/B DSB-4 Treatment Providers Juvenile Steve Hanson 203A/B DSB-5 Child Protection Services Russ Bermejo 204A DSB-6 Judges/Juvenile Courts Hon. Alan Blankenship 204C DSB-7 Law Enforcement Vanessa Price 205A/B DSB-8 Judges Family Drug Courts Hon. Phillip Britt 204B DSB-9 Prosecutors Mike Loeffler 213C/D DSB-10 Defense Attorneys Jim Egar 207A/B DSB-11 Community Supervision/Probation Services Adult Courts Karen Barnes 207C/D DSB-12 Mental Health Court Eric Olson 208A/B DSB-13 Researchers and Evaluators Anne Dannerbeck Janku 211A DSB-14 Community Supervision/Probation Services Juvenile Courts Michael Roman 209A/B DSB-15 Non-Judicial Federal Reentry Court Charles Robinson 210A/B DSB-16 DWI Court Hon. J. Michael Kavanaugh (ret.) 210C/D DSB-17 Tribal Donna Humetewa-Kaye 212A/B DSB-18 Tribal Judges Hon. Charlene Jackson 213A/B 6 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Saturday, May 31 8:00 A.M. 9:15 A.M. Speaker Room DSB-1 Treatment Providers Adults Terrence Walton 201A/B DSB-2 Administrators/Coordinators Michael Princevalli 201C/D DSB-3 Judges/Adult and Federal Hon. Peggy Davis 202A/B DSB-4 Treatment Providers Juvenile Steve Hanson 203A/B DSB-5 Child Protection Services Russ Bermejo 204A DSB-6 Judges/Juvenile Courts Hon. Alan Blankenship 204C DSB-7 Law Enforcement Vanessa Price 205A/B DSB-8 Judges Family Drug Courts Hon. Phillip Britt 204B DSB-9 Prosecutors Mike Loeffler 213C DSB-10 Defense Attorneys Jim Egar 207A/B DSB-11 Community Supervision/Probation Services Adult Courts Karen Barnes 207C/D DSB-12 Mental Health Court Eric Olson 208A/B DSB-13 Researchers and Evaluators Anne Dannerbeck Janku 211A DSB-14 Community Supervision/Probation Services Juvenile Courts Michael Roman 209A/B DSB-15 Non-Judicial Federal Reentry Court Charles Robinson 210A/B DSB-16 DWI Court Hon. J. Michael Kavanaugh (ret.) 210C/D DSB-17 Tribal Donna Humetewa-Kaye 212A/B DSB-18 Tribal Judges Hon. Charlene Jackson 213A 7

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Stanley M. Goldstein Drug Court Hall of Fame The following list of Drug Court practitioners have distinguished themselves over the years through their innovation and leadership and have been formally inducted into the Stanley M. Goldstein Drug Court Hall of Fame. This year s winner will be inducted at Saturday s closing ceremony. 2002 Judge Judy Lambert; Frankfort, KY Henry Pirowski; Buffalo, NY Marilyn Roberts; Washington, DC Judge Jeffrey Tauber; Berkeley, CA 2003 Judge Melanie G. May; West Palm Beach, FL Judge Stephen Manley; Santa Clara, CA Judge Robert P. Ziemian; South Boston, MA 2004 Judge Mary Noble; Lexington, KY Judge Robert T. Russell; Buffalo, NY 2005 Caroline Cooper; Washington, DC Judge Lou Presenza; Philadelphia, PA 2006 Judge Karen Freeman-Wilson (ret.); Gary, IN Tim Smith; San Diego, CA 2007 Judge William G. Schma; Kalamazoo, MI Judge John Schwartz; Rochester, NY 2008 Judge Darrell W. Stevens (posthumous); Chico, CA Ann Wilson; Jefferson City, MO 2009 Chief Justice Daniel T. Eismann; Boise, ID Judge Charles Chuck Simmons; Greenville, SC 2010 Rose Ewing; Tulsa, OK 2011 Judge John E. Girardeau; Hall County, GA Chief Justice William Ray Price; Jefferson City, MO Earl Hightower; Studio City, CA 2012 Judge Joanne Smith; Ramsey County, MN 2013 Helen Harberts; Chico, CA Judge Robert Rancourt; Center County, MN Previous recipients of distinguished leadership awards from 1995 2001 were grandfathered into the Drug Court Hall of Fame in 2002: Joe Brann; Washington, DC Bennett H. Brummer; Miami, FL Judge John Creuzot; Dallas, TX Lolita Curtis; Alexandria, VA Michael Smith, M.D.; Bronx, NY Katherine Fernandez-Rundle; Miami, FL Judge Robert Fogan; Fort Lauderdale, FL Luceille Fleming; Columbus, OH Edward T. Foote; Miami, FL Ron George; Sacramento, CA Judge Michael Getty; Chicago, IL Judge Stanley Goldstein; Miami, FL Judge Harl Haas; Portland, OR Chief Justice Major B. Harding; Tallahassee, FL Judge Peggy Fulton Hora (ret.); Castro Valley, CA Judge William Hunter; Franklin, LA Michael Judge; Los Angeles, CA Fran Jursco; San Francisco, CA Judge Herbert M. Klein; Miami, FL Judge Jack Lehman; Las Vegas, NV Barry Mahoney, Ph.D.; Denver, CO General Barry McCaffrey; Washington, DC Claire McCaskill; Kansas City, MO Israel Milton; Miami, FL Judge James Milliken; San Diego, CA Judge Patrick Morris; San Bernardino, CA Timothy Murray; Washington, DC Bill Ritter; Denver, CO Attorney General Janet Reno; Washington, DC Assistant Attorney General Laurie Robinson; Washington, DC Deputy Associate Attorney General Reggie Robinson; Washington, DC Frank Tapia; Oakland, CA Bill Vickery; San Francisco, CA Janna Walker; Broken Arrow, OK Andrew Wells; Vienna, Austria Judge Gerald Wetherington; Miami, FL 8 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 12 Step Meetings Marriott Suite 312, 3rd Floor, Palms Tower Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, and Cocaine Anonymous Meetings WEDNESDAY MAY 28 THURSDAY MAY 29 FRIDAY MAY 30 SATURDAY MAY 31 6:30 a.m. AA (Closed) AA (Closed) AA (Closed) AA (Closed) 12:00 p.m. MA CA MA 6:30 p.m. CA NA NA 7:30 p.m. NA MA CA 8:30 p.m. AA (Open) NA NA (Open) State Associations and Committee Meetings State association meetings have been scheduled throughout this conference. They will be listed in the day s ancillary activities. Please check to see if your state s association has scheduled a gathering. Do you want to schedule a state association meeting? A limited number of Pop-up rooms and sessions may be available! Just approach any NADCP/NDCI staff member and ask them to get you in touch with Jennifer Lubold who will assign you to a room. Tuesday, May 27 State Drug Court Coordinators Meeting 1:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. Orange County Ballroom, Salon 4, Marriott Council of State Drug Court Associations Council of State Drug Court Associations Meeting (State Delegates Only) Wednesday, May 28 12:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Newport Beach/Rancho Las Palmas, Lower Level, Marriott Wednesday, May 28 California Association of Drug Court Professionals Members Only Meeting 11:30 a.m. 12:30 p.m. Light refreshments served Open Meeting 12:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. Presentation on California Re-Entry Courts La Jolla/Los Angeles, Marriott Council of State Drug Court Associations (CSDCA) 12:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Newport Beach/Rancho Las Palmas Lower Level, Marriott Texas Association of Drug Court Professionals Annual Meeting 12:15 p.m. 1:45 p.m. Grand Ballroom C/D, Marriott OJJDP Family Drug Court Program Grantee Meeting 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Grand Ballroom A/B, Marriott Thursday, May 29 New England Association of Drug Court Professionals (NEADCP) Annual Meeting 11:45 a.m. 1:15 p.m. 202 A/B, Anaheim Convention Center Friday, May 30 New Jersey Drug Court Lunch Meeting 11:30 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Desert Springs, Lower Level, Marriott Thurgood Marshall Action Coalition, Inc. (TMAC) Annual Meeting 6:00 p.m. 8:00 p.m. Marquis Northeast, Marriott 9

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Drug Court Expo Schedule Anaheim Convention Center, Hall A Wednesday, May 28 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. 25th Anniversary Party and Expo Opening Reception Thursday, May 29 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Expo Open with continental breakfast for all attendees 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. Expo Open with lunch concessions offered at 11:45 a.m. 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Dessert Reception Friday, May 30 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Expo Open with continental breakfast for all attendees 7:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Open Drug Court Expo Opening Reception Come Celebrate 25 Years of Drug Court! Wednesday, May 28 from 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Anaheim Convention Center, Hall A We Welcome You Back To The Future 1989 was a big year. Mikhail Gorbachev was named the Soviet president. Colin Powell became the first African American Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Field of Dreams was a box office blockbuster. But it was also in 1989 that the first Drug Court opened and brought an exciting new alternative to non-violent drug offenders. Now, 25 years later, it s time to party like it s 1989. Watch for some surprise performances at our Opening Reception and come ready to dance to the 80s maybe even The Electric Slide or The Robot. Join us and help us to remember why 1989 was a really important year. Drug Court Expo Dessert Reception! Thursday, May 29 from 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Anaheim Convention Center, Hall A Join us in the Drug Court Expo for a night of delicious desserts. This reception gives you a chance to network with the exhibitors and your peers. You can see cutting edge technology and services available to Drug Courts around the world. And while you re there, we ask you thank our great exhibitors for their support. 10 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Featured Guests Jonathan Blodgett National District Attorneys Association Michael Botticelli Acting Director Office of National Drug Control Policy Dr. Westley Clark Director Center for Substance Abuse Treatment The Honorable Nathan Deal Governor, Georgia Melanie Griffith Actress Robert Listenbee Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Tim Murray Executive Director Pretrial Justice Institute Chuck Noerenberg President National Alliance for Drug Endangered Children Denise O Donnell Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Matthew Perry Actor All Rise Ambassador Former Congressman Jim Ramstad (R) Minnesota Denise Richards Actress Lynn Richardson National Legal Aid and Defender Association The Honorable Mark R. Rosekind, PhD National Transportation Safety Board Kevin Sabet Co-founder Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) Martin Sheen Actor Ambassador Paul E. Simons Executive Secretary Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission of the Organization of American States Paul Williams Singer, Songwriter, Actor, Author and Recovery Advocate 11

PRESENTS Rock Legends The American Vinyl All Star Band A BeneFiT ConCeRT FeATuRinG Jeffery Skunk Baxter (Doobie brothers/steely Dan) Barry Goudreau & Fran Sheehan (formerly of the band boston) Leroy LSR Romans (the Wailers/3rd WorlD) Robert Mousey Thomson (James brown) Danny Beissel (FosterchilD) & guest stars Hugh McDonald (bon Jovi) Charlie Colin (train) may 29 AnAheim Convention Center Doors open at 7 PM $30 General admission $25 active duty BUy your tickets today! www.justiceforvets.org/benefit or at registration with emcee DeniSe RiCHARDS

Conference At-A-Glance Conference At-A-Glance

THIS YEAR! 21.5 hours of social work continuing education credits approved by NASW Continuing Education Online Only Visit www.allrise.org or the CLE/CJE/CEU desk at the Anaheim Convention Center, Lobby A, onsite for further instructions. To receive continuing education credits you must register with YOUR e-mail address. Deadline to submit evaluations: Arkansas: June 10, 2014 All other states: June 20, 2014 NADCP understands the importance of providing you with excellent education and we recognize the growing demand for Continuing Education evaluation and certificates in an online format. We are proud to provide an online system and simplify the process for you. You will be able to complete your evaluations and get your certificate up until June 10 (Arkansas) and June 20, 2014 (all other states). Continuing legal education (CLE) and continuing judicial education (CJE) credits will be offered for attorneys and judges attending the conference. Continuing education units (CEU) will be offered for mental health, social work, and drug addiction treatment professionals. A link will be sent to the email address you provided when you registered. This will give you access to the session evaluations, post conference evaluation, and your certificate (#, State, type of certificate) in order to get credit. To receive CLE, CJE, or CEU credits, you must register with YOUR email address. If you don t have an email address or did not provide one when you registered see the onsite CLE/CJE/CEU desk or email Ann Wilson at awilson0155@gmail.com for assistance. Attendees cannot use another attendee s email link to access the survey as the certificate will be in another person s name. You must record each session you attended online in order to receive credit. Pre-approval of hours will still continue as in years past, and reports will still be made to states requiring reports from the provider. All reports will be based on the online evaluation and attendance that you complete. In order to receive credits, all evaluations must be completed in the online system by June 10 (Arkansas) and June 20, 2014 (all other states). Make sure to visit the CLE/CJE/CEU desk during the conference to obtain State required certificates (primarily CLE and CJE), to sign-in (CA CLE) and to ensure you are completing everything necessary to receive credit. NADCP is a NAADAC-approved education provider. This program is Approved by the National Assocation of Social Workers (Approval #886658357-2607) for 21.5 Social Work continuing education contact hours. Come to Your Senses Anaheim Marriott, Grand Ballroom G/H The Refuge, a Healing Place offers a full continuum of care for both men and women suffering from PTSD, Trauma, Substance Abuse, and Process Addictions. The Refuge treatment model utilizes holistic methods and experiential approaches to provide a safe and nurturing environment to heal. The work we are here to do is to transform the world. In order to transform the world we must first transform the mind. Meditation is a means to transform the mind. The morning guided meditations will provide grounding, energy and a mindfulness which will support the individual, the conference, the Drug Courts, and the world. Space is limited. Wednesday, May 28 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Grand Ballroom G/H Anaheim Marriott Thursday, May 29 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Grand Ballroom G/H Anaheim Marriott Friday, May 30 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Grand Ballroom G/H Anaheim Marriott

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Conference At-A-Glance All events will be at the Anaheim Convention Center unless noted otherwise. TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2014 TIME EVENT ROOM 1:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. State Drug Court Coordinators Meeting Orange County Ballroom, Salon 4, Marriott 2:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Registration Convention Center Lobby A WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2014 DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC BREAKOUTS, SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS AND DRUG COURT EXPO OPENING RECEPTION TIME EVENT ROOM 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Convention Center Lobby and Marriott Ballroom Foyer 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration Convention Center Lobby A 7:30 a.m. 8:45 a.m. Discipline Specific Breakouts See Page 6 9:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Skills Building Workshops SB-1 Alcohol Monitoring: Best Practices for Selecting the Right Tools to Fit Each Client s Risks and Needs 213 C/D SB-2 Effective Strategies in Juvenile Drug Court 207 C/D SB-3 Case Management 202 A/B SB-4 DWI Court Forum 209 A/B SB-5 Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices 204 B SB-6 Target Population: Best Practices 213 A/B SB-7 HEAT 201 C/D SB-8 Ancillary Services: Best Practices 205 A/B SB-9 America s Worst Drug Epidemic: How Did We Get Here and What Can We Do About It? 210 A/B SB-10 Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Trauma and Substance Abuse But Were Afraid to Ask: Now You Can! 210 C/D SB-11 Legal Issues in Adult Drug Court: Best Practices 207 A/B SB-12 Historically Disadvantaged Groups: Best Practices 204 A SB-13 The Critical Role of the Team: Best Practices 203 A/B SB-14 Co-Occurring Disorders: What Legal, Supervision, and Case Management Professionals Should Know 212 A/B SB-15 Grant Information From a Panel of Federal Experts 204 C SB-16 Listening to Themes: Trauma-informed Treatment 201 A/B 12:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Council of Drug Court Associations Meeting (State Delegates only) Newport Beach/Rancho Las Palmas, Marriott 15

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2014 DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC BREAKOUTS, SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS AND DRUG COURT EXPO OPENING RECEPTION TIME EVENT ROOM 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. Skills Building Workshops SB-17 Real World Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension) in Specialty Courts 213 C/D SB-18 Drug Testing: Best Practices 210 C/D SB-19 Data, Evaluation, and Fidelity to the Model: Best Practices 207 A/B SB-20 DWI Court Forum 209 A/B SB-21 Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices 204 B SB-22 New Directions for Problem-Solving Courts 202 A/B SB-24 Tribal Nations Forum 204 A SB-25 Reentry Court on Steroids 213 A/B SB-26 Mental Illness, Recovery, and Procedural Fairness: Challenges and New Directions for Treatment Courts 204 C SB-27 Heroin Resurgence and Prescription Opiates: Critical Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment 201 A/B SB-28 The Use of Medication Assisted Treatment: What Drug Court Professionals Need to Know 205 A/B SB-29 HEAT 201 C/D SB-30 Tested and Proven: Utilization of Recovery Support Specialists as a Key Engagement and Retention Strategy in FDC (and Beyond) 203 A/B SB-31 Recovery Strategies in the Drug Court Environment 212 A/B SB-32 Supervision 210 A/B 5:30p.m. 7:30p.m. Drug Court Expo Opening Reception (Come Celebrate 25 Years of Drug Court) Exhibit Hall A For Attorneys and Judges!! The NADCP 20th Annual Training Conference includes an unprecedented number of legal sessions. Sessions include Ethics, Immigration, Due Process, Prosecutor s Role in Drug Court, Defense Attorney s Role in Drug Court, Federal Confidentiality Laws, and much more! With two tracks devoted to legal sessions, along with several Skills Building Sessions and Concurrent General Sessions, this year s conference is an even greater tool for the lawyer or judge working in a Problem-Solving Court. Please check with the Continuing Education booth in the Registration area of the Anaheim Convention Center to get more information on possible CLE credit for your attendance. Thanks for all your hard work in the Drug Court field! 16 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 OPENING CEREMONY AND CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS SESSION A, B, C, AND D TIME EVENT ROOM 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Exhibit Hall A 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration (Closed During Opening Ceremony) Convention Center Lobby A 8:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Opening Ceremony Arena 10:00a.m. 2:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Hall Open Exhibit Hall A 10:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. Concurrent Workshops Session A A-1 Ten Key Components and the Research 201 A/B A-2 Parents are Adults Too--Implementing Adult Best Practices in Family Drug Courts: Bridging Opportunities for System Change and Program Fidelity 201 C A-3 Sixteen Strategies and Effective Practice in Juvenile Drug Courts 201 D A-4 Mental Health Courts A-Z 202 A/B A-5 What Juvenile Drug Courts Need to Know About Providing Effective Services for Youth With Co-Occuring Disorders 203 A/B A-6 Cultural Competency 101: An Introduction 204 A A-7 Statewide Outcome and Cost-Benefit Analysis - Lessons Learned 204 C A-8 Cocaine 204 B A-9 Critical Role of Risk/Need in Building Incentives and Sanctions 207 C/D A-10 Supervision to Support Recovery and Public Safety 206 A/B A-11 Trauma Informed Approaches: A Judicial Perspective 210 D A-12 HEAT Update 205 A/B A-13 Implementing and Supporting Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network 208 A/B A-14 San Diego Specialty Court Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension) 210 A/B A-15 Is it Heroin or Prescription Drugs? 209 A/B A-16 The Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts 210 C A-17 Procedural Justice: Improving Court Outcomes Through Enhanced Perceptions of Fairness 207 A/B A-18 The New ASAM Criteria: Implications for Drug Courts and Treatment Providers 213 C/D A-19 Incorporating Native Culture and Tradition 211 B A-20 Five Ways to Wreck Your Career: Ethics for Treatment Providers 212 A/B A-21 Incorporating Criminogenic Risks/Needs, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Needs to Reduce Recidivism and Promote Recovery 213 B A-22 Marketing Your Drug Court to Local Officials 213 A A-23 Los Mejor Estándares de Práctica e Investigación 211 A 11:45 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Concessions for Purchase in Drug Court Expo Exhibit Hall A 17

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 OPENING CEREMONY AND CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS SESSION A, B, C, AND D TIME EVENT ROOM 1:15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. Concurrent Workshops Session B B-1 Building a Multi-Disciplinary Team 201 A/B B-2 Closed Doors or Welcome Mat? Opening the Way for Medically Assisted Treatment in FDC 201 C B-3 Forming a Lasting Partnership Between the Courts and Treatment 201 D B-4 Evaluating Your Mental Health Court 202 A/B B-5 Review of NDCI s New Curriculum on Best Practices with Co-Occurring Populations 203 A/B B-6 How to Effectively Work with Native Participants 204 A B-7 Visual Performance Feedback in Drug Court: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words 204 C B-8 Alcohol 204 B B-9 Fundamentals of Incentives and Sanctions in Adult Drug Court 207 C/D B-10 The Smoking Gun: The Role of Law Enforcement and Ethical Issues in a Drug Court Setting 206 A/B B-11 Border Towns: Special Issues to Consider for Drug Courts on the US/Mexican Border 210 D B-12 From the Needle to the Pen: Telling it Like it is! Addicted to Drugs or Addicted to the Lifestyle 205 A/B B-13 New Directions in PTSD Definition and Treatment 208 A/B B-14 What s in Your Drug Screen? 210 A/B B-15 24/7 Alcohol Monitoring of Offenders Pretrial and Postrial 209 A/B B-16 Impaired Driving Risk Assessment: What Practitioners Need to Know 210 C B-17 Adoption & Safe Families Act: What Does it Mean for Family Drug Courts? 207 A/B B-18 Guiding System-Level Change: Developing a Comprehensive Plan for Integrating Innovative Programs into Drug Court 213 C/D B-19 Native American Treatment and Clinical Strategies for Traveling the Wellness Road 211B B-20 The Zealous Advocate: Defining the Defense Counsel Role as it Applies to Best Practice Standards 212 A/B B-21 Closing a Service Gap: A Juvenile Drug Court Model to Serve Low to Moderate Risk, High Needs 213 B B-22 Using Treatment Mapping to Maximize Community Treatment Resources and Reduce Gaps in Services for Offenders 213 A B-23 Condado de Queens, NY, Tribunal de Manjar Bajo la Influencia de Alcohol, 7 años de éxito probado 211 A 18 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 2:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Concurrent Workshops Session C C-1 Target Population 201 A/B C-2 New Ways of Serving Children in family Drug Courts Case Studies from the Children Affected by Methamphetamines Grant Program 201 C C-3 Economic Analysis of an Integrated Juvenile Treatment Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures Model: Methods and Results from Five Sites 201 D C-4 Mental Health Courts How to Successfully Integrate Drug Court Evidence-Based Practices into Your Mental Health Court 202 A/B C-5 Drug Court? Mental Health Court? Something Else?: Getting the Right People into the Right Programs 203 A/B C-6 Real Men Wear Pink (for women only) 204 A C-7 Findings from the Evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center: Implications for Other Problem-Solving Courts 204 C C-8 Designer Drugs 204 B C-9 Incentives and Sanctions in Juvenile Drug Court 207 C/D C-10 Assessing and Addressing Family Needs in Adult Drug Courts 206 A/B C-11 Immigration Issues 210 D C-12 Black Trauma 205 A/B C-13 Secondary Trauma Is Not Secondary in Importance: Supporting Staff Doing Trauma Informed Treatment 208 A/B C-14 Alcohol Monitoring and Testing Technologies: A Primer for New Programs, a Refresher on Policies 210 A/B C-15 Advances and New Skills in Case Interpretation and Sentencing Design for Problem-Solving Courts: Decision Support Technologies for Judges and Other Stakeholders 209 A/B C-16 Strategies for Getting Law Enforcement on Board 210 C C-17 Queens District Attorney s Office Embrace the 10 Key Components 207 A/B C-18 Peer Recovery Support: Recovery Coaching A New Approach to Reducing Recidivism in Problem Solving Courts 213 C/D C-19 Separate Tracks in Healing to Wellness Court 211 B C-20 Guess What? You re a Family Court, Too (if your Clients have Children) Legal Issues and Practical Considerations When Working with Families in Drug Courts 212 A/B C-21 The RNR Program Tool for Adults: Achieving Better Outcomes Through Quality Programming 213 B C-22 From Good to Great: Using Process and Outcome Data to Support Best Practice and Improve Outcomes 213 A C-23 Supervisión Comunitaria 211 A Drug Courts perform their duties without manifestation, by word or conduct, of bias or prejudice, including, but not limited to, bias or prejudice based upon race, gender, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, language or socioeconomic status. 19

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014 OPENING CEREMONY AND CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS SESSION A, B, C, AND D TIME EVENT ROOM 4:15 p.m. 5:30 p.m. Concurrent Workshops Session D D-1 The Brain on Drugs 201 A/B D-2 So How Do You Know They are Ready? Key Considerations for Assessing Families in Recovery for Reunification 201 C D-3 Preparing for Team Transition in a Juvenile Drug Court: Why is it so Important? 201 D D-4 Risk and Needs in Mental Health Courts 202 A/B D-5 New Developments in Supported Employment 203 A/B D-6 From Silence to Trust - Serving Asian-American Families in Drug Courts 204 A D-7 NEW! Drug Court Peer Review: Creating a Learning Community - How Do You Do It? How Does It Work? Peer Experiences in Four States: Oregon, Colorado, Idaho and Georgia 204 C D-8 Working with Methamphetamine Addicted Offenders 204 B D-9 Incentives and Sanctions in Family Dependency Treatment Court: Special Issues to Consider 207 C/D D-10 Traditional and Non-Traditional Benefits from Probation and Law Enforcement Officers 206 A/B D-11 Giving Latino Participants a Voice in Drug Court: Eliminating Racial Disparities in Outcomes 210 D D-12 From Boyz to Men 205 A/B D-13 Complex Trauma 208 A/B D-16 Marijuana and Driving Impairment 210 C D-17 Leveraging National Health Reform to Reduce Recidivism & Build Recovery 207 A/B D-18 Building Effective Interventions for Young Adults in Adult Drug Courts 213 C/D D-19 Indian Country Legal Implications 211 B D-20 Collaborative Justice: The PD and the Prosecutor, An Unlikely Couple 212 A/B D-21 An Accelerated Track for Low Risk/Low Need Offenders 213 B D-22 New Jersey s Drug Court: Making a Difference 213 A D-23 El Rol de la Familia y su Impacto en el Proceso de Recuperación 211 A 5:45 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Membership Meeting Marquis Northeast, Marriott 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Dessert Reception Exhibit Hall A 8:00 p.m. Justice For Vets Benefit Concert Featuring The American Vinyl All Star Band Arena Badges Badges are mandatory for all NADCP events and sessions; however, while exploring the Anaheim, CA area, please exercise caution and remove your badge. 20 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 FRIDAY, MAY 30, 2014 CONCURRENT PLENARY AND CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS SESSION E, CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS, AND SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS TIME EVENT ROOM 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. New Member/First Time Attendee Breakfast Marquis Northwest, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Continental Breakfast Exhibit Hall A 7:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Exhibit Hall A 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration Convention Center Lobby A 8:00 a.m. 9:30 a.m. CP-1: Follow the Evidence: A Research Update Arena 10:00 a.m. 11:15 a.m. Concurrent Workshops Session E E-1 Data Collection and Evaluation: Where to Begin? 201 A/B E-2 The Grant is Over Now What? Refinancing and Redirection as Real Sustainability Planning for your FDC 201 C E-3 Creating an Individualized Juvenile Drug Court 201 D E-4 Mental Health Courts: Unique Issues and Research Powered Solutions 202 A/B E-6 A Courageous Conversation: Addressing Race in Drug Courts 204 A E-7 Accounting for the Role of Families in Drug Court Evaluations 204 C E-8 Marijuana 204 B E-9 Behavior Modification and The Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider 207 C/D E-10 CBT for LEO s 206 A/B E-12 Enabling in the Black Community 205 A/B E-13 Healing Trauma: Strategies for Abused Women 208 A/B E-17 Addressing Seven Common Challenges Drug Courts Are Encountering 207 A/B E-18 Expand the Evidence Base: Routine Outcomes Monitoring in the Context of Community Reintegration 213 CD E-20 Ethical Considerations for Attorneys and Judges in Problem-Solving Courts 212 A/B E-21 Statewide Implementation of the RANT in Missouri 213 B E-22 Implementing an Education Program in Your Drug Court 213 A E-23 La Interseccion se Justicia Terapeutica Y Justicia Restaurativa 211 A 1:00 p.m. 2:15 p.m. Concurrent General Sessions CG-1 Matching Service to Need: Exploring What High Risk/High Need Means for FDCs Arena CG-2 Innovations in Health Care and Criminal Justice Reform 210A/B CG-3 Reentry Ten Key Components 207A/B CG-4 Establishing the First Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia: Strategies, Processes, Outcomes 212A/B CG-5 Taking Drug Court To Scale: Three Statewide Initiatives 213C/D CG-6 Implementing and Supporting Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network 201A/B CG-7 Confidentiality 204B CG-8 What Judges and other Practitioners Should Know about Treatment Services 209A/B 21

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY, MAY 30, 2014 CONCURRENT PLENARY AND CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS SESSION E, CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS, AND SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS TIME EVENT ROOM 2:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. Skills Building Workshops SB-33 Health Care Reform: Understanding and Navigating the Affordable Care Act 210A/B SB-34 Judicial Role and Ethics: Best Practices 212A/B SB-35 Substance Abuse Treatment: Best Practices 204B SB-36 The Trauma-Addiction Connection: Spirals of Recovery and Healing 201B SB-38 Drug Court Coordinator Forum! Marriott, Grand Ballroom A/B SB-39 Challenges and Solutions Facing Rural Drug Courts 209A/B SB-40 The Fundamentals of Designer Drugs: A Primer Arena SB-41 Women in Drug Treatment Courts: Sexual Assault as the Underlying Trauma 207A/B SATURDAY, MAY 31, 2014 DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC BREAKOUTS, CLOSING CEREMONY AND CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS TIME EVENT ROOM 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Convention Center Lobby and Marriott Ballroom Foyer 7:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. Registration (Closed during Closing Ceremony) Convention Center Lobby A 8:00 a.m. 9:15 a.m. Discipline Specific Breakouts See Page 6 9:30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. Closing Ceremony Arena 11:45 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Concurrent General Sessions CG-9 Understanding the Impact of the ACA - New Benefits and Challenges for Adult Drug Courts 209 A/B CG-10 Leadership Role of the Drug Court Judge to Sustain the Drug Court Program Over the Long Term 201 A/B CG-11 Through a Child s Eyes: Understanding Addiction and Recovery 207 A/B CG-12 The Fundamentals of Urine Specimen Tampering Arena CG-13 ADHD and its Impact on Our Jail and Treatment Populations 212 A/B CG-16 Now That We Have Best Practice Standards, What Do We Do With Them? 201 C/D CG-17 Effective Cognitive-Behavioral Programming with MRT 204 B Session Handouts and speaker biographies Go to allrise.org to access handouts, speaker biographies, and more! 22 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Training Track Descriptions TRACK 1 Ready, Set, Go! Implementing Your Drug Court Implementing an Adult Drug Court takes the initiative and cooperation of a diverse group of players. Public health and public safety partners define goals and objectives, identify resources, and strategize on sustainability. This track will address the considerations and partnerships that must be made in the early stages of planning and implementing an Adult Drug Court. This track also provides the scientific principles and best practices to ensure that any Drug Court is built on a solid foundation to ensure success and sustainability. TRACK 2 Raising the Bar: Taking Family Dependency Treatment Courts to the Next Level Family Drug Courts are built on a foundation of shared mission and vision, supported by client services and agency collaboration, and achieved by shared outcomes. This track will build upon the emerging research and practice-based evidence during the course of the last 18 years since its emergence in the mid-1990s. This track will address both scale and scope issues and the systems changes that are necessary to optimize the outcomes of existing FDCs and create effective new FDCs. Topics will be relevant for professionals who are working both inside and outside of FDC programs, for anyone who is seeking to better engage and serve children and families, including those in the child welfare system. TRACK 3 Juvenile Drug Courts: Building on Our Success Juvenile Drug Courts are a critical part of every juvenile justice system. They provide a unique partnership focused on the future of our communities. What is the best way to engage juveniles and their families? What is considered developmentally appropriate, gender-specific, culturally relevant, and evidence-based treatment? What roles do schools and the faith community play? Whether you are considering developing a Juvenile Drug Court, or your Juvenile Drug Court has been in operation for one year or more, this track is for you. Learn from national researchers as well as subject matter experts about the latest research and effective approaches to dealing with adolescent populations. TRACK 4 Mental Health Courts: From Implementation to Operation Almost half of all addicted persons in the justice system have a co-occurring mental illness, and over 70 percent of incarcerated mentally ill persons wrestle with addiction. This track highlights the fundamental issues needed to understand and develop a Mental Health Court, one of the fastest growing types of Problem-Solving Courts in the nation. Whether you work in a Mental Health Court, or your Drug Court serves participants with mental illness, this track has infor mation you need. Come learn what works in treatment, supervision, and case management for the mentally ill participants in your program. 23

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court TRACK 5 Participants with Co-Occurring Disorders: Advanced Issues Hundreds of Problem-Solving Courts have participants dealing with co-occurring mental illness and addiction. This track tackles some of the advanced issues for practitioners serving this population. Whether you re looking for the research on outcomes, tips on case management, or what evidence-based treatment is available, this track is not to be missed. TRACK 6 Ensuring Cultural Proficiency: More Than Just Awareness Culture is everywhere around us. It is how we dress, what we choose to eat, and what music we enjoy. It shapes our past, present, and future. It is essential to recognize and understand the culture of our Drug Court participants in order to shape their future. It follows that we will enhance our effectiveness by becoming culturally proficient. It is so simple to see, but so challenging to implement. This track will not only focus on the seeing, but also provide the latest in practice and research on the implementation. TRACK 7 The Facts and Nothing but the Facts: Critical Role of Research There is no doubt Drug Court works. This track offers details into national and statewide evaluations, along with tips for operating courts on how to incorporate successful strategies. Fostering partnership with practitioners and researchers is critical toward improving Drug Court outcomes. Don t miss the opportunity to learn how to improve your program measurement and outcomes, while also learning what recent evaluations say about program success. TRACK 8 Keeping Ahead of the Curve: Drugs of Choice Drug Court participants are very sophisticated consumers of their drug of choice. They select from a myriad of drugs whose effects are widely varied. Although it is critical for treatment providers to understand the effects of these drugs, all Drug Court professionals need to be trained in their impact on supervision, case management, drug testing and treatment planning. Learn the latest in pharmacology and research findings to enhance programming and improve partnerships in your community. TRACK 9 The Good, The Bad, and The Effective: Incentives and Sanctions Incentives and sanctions are essential to every Drug Court. When properly used, they are a powerful tool for improving client behavior and outcomes. Drug Courts achieve better outcomes when practitioners understand the science behind behavior management. The research is clear: managing participant behavior includes the development of graduated and individualized motivational strategies, as well as consequences to hold participants accountable for failing to meet programmatic goals. Incentives and sanctions imposed in the courtroom have an impact not only on the individual appearing before the judge, but also on the other Drug Court members present. After attending the sessions on this track, you will understand the why behind behavior modification, along with how to implement the skills and knowledge. 24 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 TRACK 10 Supervision: The Challenges Faced by Probation and Law Enforcement Law enforcement, probation, and other community supervision partnerships are critical to any successful Drug Court. This track focuses on the importance of strengthening the role of law enforcement and community supervision, and assisting probation officers and law enforcement in better understanding their role in the Drug Court arena. TRACK 11 Working with the Latino Community: Strategies for Better Outcomes Drug Courts reflect the communities in which they are located. Addressing the needs of the Latino population goes well beyond dealing with communication barriers. Culture, residency status, and employability are among the many factors that present Drug Court practitioners an extra challenge when working with these clients. This track is designed to help practitioners working with the Latino community meet that challenge. TRACK 12 African American Clients: Improving Services and Improving Outcomes This track is a necessity for problem-solving practi tioners looking to improve outcomes with African American clients. Experts from around the nation address best practices, cultural competency, treatment approaches and more. TRACK 13 Trauma This track offers evidence-based approaches to assessment and treatment of trauma, which is critical to the effective operations of every Drug Court and other Problem-Solving Court. Hear from national experts and learn practical tips to enhance your court s treatment, case management, and supervision strategies. TRACK 14 AND 15 Science and Technology Private enterprise offers many necessary tools for Drug Court operations. From unique methods assisting with community supervision to a variety of drug testing options, from research-proven ways to use medicallyassisted treatment to successful treatment techniques, our partners in the private sector are a critical asset to Drug Courts success. These sessions apprise practitioners of new developments in science and technology and provide a perspective on the concerns that every Drug Court should have in selecting the right tools of the trade. These tracks provide the practitioner with a wealth of information in order to become a wise consumer of products and services intended for the Drug Court field. (NADCP does not endorse any product or service.) 25

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court TRACK 16 DWI Courts DWI Courts work. According to the research, DWI Court saves lives and money and restores participants to a clean and sober life. DWI Court is based on the proven Drug Court model, however, DWI Court participants are different than Drug Court participants, and understanding those differences is critical for any DWI Court. If your Drug Court is considering starting a DWI Court, or you are updating an established DWI program, then this track is for you. Attendees in this track will gain an increased understanding of the principles specific to DWI Court, important issues in dealing with DWI Court participants, and ways to modify current operations to include this population. TRACK 17 Legal Issues in and beyond Problem-Solving Courts For attorneys practicing in Problem-Solving Courts, the legal issues are multi-faceted. The sessions in this track focus on topics of interest within Problem-Solving Courts, but also stretch far beyond the Problem-Solving Court arena. From judicial immunity to statutory revisions; from issues involving criminal defense to fi rearms possession, these sessions are designed to answer some of the most complex questions for the attorneys and judges in Problem-Solving Courts. TRACK 18 Advanced Issues in Drug and Alcohol Treatment One size definitely does not fit all. As in many things, this is so true in effective drug and alcohol treatment. This track identifies a variety of treatment methods, along with insight into some specific and complex issues with which many Drug Court clients struggle. TRACK 19 Learning from Native Traditions: Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Tribal healing to wellness courts are profound expressions of sovereign, self-determining nations. Such courts have become an important part of a long, often perilous, and amazing Nation rebuilding process that began for American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities after centuries of war, oppression, and resistance. Consequently, the impact of a tribal Drug Court is complex and multi-faceted affecting multigenerational attitudes and perceptions about alcohol and other drugs, addressing historical trauma and unresolved grief, acting as a tool to restore tribal values, expanding tribal justice systems, improving state-tribal and federal-tribal relation ships, and restoring individuals to their rightful place as contributing members to the tribal community. Sessions in the tribal track will convey the complexities and nuances of Tribal Healing/Wellness Courts and contain useful information for both state and tribal practitioners. 26 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 TRACK 20 Legal and Ethical Issues in Problem-Solving Courts Problem-Solving Courts present interesting legal issues and ethical dilemmas. This track asks and answers some of the most difficult legal and ethical questions facing the Drug Court team. Whether you are a new Problem- Solving Court professional, or you ve been with Drug Courts for many years, this track includes sessions on the cutting edge of what every Drug Court and other Problem-Solving Court practitioner should know. TRACK 22 Taking Drug Courts to the Next Level Drug Court practitioners have a variety of issues to consider in addition to providing effective treatment, case management, and supervision. From budgets to team transition, from steering committees to contract management, practitioners at the state and local levels wrestle with a host of administrative duties, which can be overwhelming. This track offers insight and guidance into many of the administrative issues facing the state and local Drug Court practitioner. TRACK 21 Risk/Need and Proper Placement Research has proven that assessing for risk and need level is critical for placement into an appropriate program and/or level of treatment and supervision. Drug Courts work best for individuals who are high risk/high need, but what about others? This track offers a range of sessions for professionals in the justice/ treatment fields to assist in assessing and placing individuals based on risk/need. TRACK 23 Spanish Language Track Back by popular demand, NADCP is offering a track in Spanish! The sessions in this track include fundamentals in implementing and operating a Drug Court program in your community. De regreso por demanda popular, NADCP está ofreciendo una pista en español! Las sesiones en esta pista son fundamentales en la implementación y operación de un programa de corte de drogas en su comunidad. 27

Wednesday Schedule of Events Wednesday, May 28 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Convention Center Level 2 Lobby and Marriott Ballroom Foyer 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration Convention Center Lobby A 7:30 a.m. 8:45 a.m. Discipline Specific Breakouts See Page 6 9:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Skills Building Workshops 12:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. Council of State Drug Court Associations Meeting (State Delegates only) Newport Beach/Rancho Las Palmas, Marriott 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. Skills Building Workshops 5:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Drug Court Expo Opening Reception Come Celebrate 25 Years of Drug Court! Exhibition Hall A Wednesday

Notes

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS MORNING SESSIONS Wednesday, May 28 9:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. SESSION SB-1 Alcohol Monitoring: Best Practices for Selecting the Right Tools to Fit Each Client s Risks and Needs 213C/D Research shows that one-size fits all models for managing alcohol offenders are unsuccessful. The most effective and cost-efficient programs tailor supervision to the risks and needs of the client. High-risk alcohol clients require more intensive supervision to reduce the risk of recidivism. Lower-risk clients can actually experience negative outcomes when supervision and treatment isn t proportional to their level of offense. Best-practices for alcohol monitoring programs enable courts to apply graduated sanctions (scale monitoring up or down) based on a client s needs and progress. Learn about the 5 challenges to alcohol monitoring and the technologies available to monitor for alcohol use. Learn about common indicators for different levels of alcohol-involved clients and how to pair clients with appropriate technologies based on their risks and needs. Hear from a Specialty Court judge who is using a range of alcohol-monitoring technologies, the criteria for use, and the court s experience. Hon. Elisabeth A. Earle Presiding Judge County Court at Law Seven at Travis County Austin, Texas AJ Gigler Director of Product Marketing SCRAM Systems Denver, Colorado SESSION SB-2 Effective Strategies in Juvenile Drug Court 207C/D Juvenile Drug Courts are not equally effective. In fact, certain Juvenile Drug Courts have achieved far greater success, while others have shown very little success in outcome studies. But what differentiates successful Juvenile Drug Courts from unsuccessful ones? Research has clearly shown that Juvenile Drug Courts which incorporate specific best practices achieve far greater outcomes. This session will outline the research on Juvenile Drug Courts, including best practices, along with practical tips on how to implement those practices in your court. This session is a must for every Juvenile Drug Court practitioner. Identify the best practices in a Juvenile Drug Court as identified in the research. Identify concrete implementation strategies to incorporate best practices into your Juvenile Drug Court. Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon Jacqueline Van Wormer Associate Professor Washington State University Richland, Washington WEDNESDAY 31

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-4 DWI Court Forum 209A/B The morning sessions of the DWI Court Forum are designed for NEW DWI Courts which have not yet attended NCDC s Planning and Implementation training, and for those who are interested in starting a DWI Court in their jurisdictions. These sessions would also be beneficial for those who are working in an existing program, who have not attended any formal training and want some exposure to the fundamentals of DWI Court development. Experienced and trained DWI Court professionals who simply want to have a refresher course in basic information can also benefit from attending the morning session. SESSION SB-3 Case Management 202A/B Case Management is an essential component of the successful operation of a Drug Court. It is described by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) as a coordinated approach to the delivery of health, substance abuse, mental health and social services linking clients with appropriate services to address specific needs and achieve stated goals. A coordinated team strategy and seamless collaboration between the treatment and justice systems is required to sustain integrated and effective Drug Court systems. Identify the roles, functions, principles, knowledge and skills of Drug Court case managers. Determine the five key functions of case management. Marilyn Gibson Drug Court Administrator 31st Judicial Circuit Court Springfield, Missouri Sonya Harper Project Director of NDCRC NDCI - The Professional Services Branch of NADCP Alexandria, Virginia 9:00 a.m. 9:50 a.m. Introduction and Overview The first session of the morning will include a brief introduction to the three morning sessions. The focus of this session will be in two parts: First, you will learn about the processes involved in applying to attend NCDC s training for new DWI Court programs. Second, there will be a review of the typical agenda which is used during our 3 and ½ day training programs, sponsored by NHTSA, including a summary of each of the topics which are covered. Learn about the training application process. Briefly examine the subjects covered in our 3 and ½ days planning and implementation training. Hon. J. Michael Kavanaugh (ret.) Judge Senior Director, National Center for DWI Courts Alexandria, Virginia Hon. Patrick Bowler (ret.) Judge National Center for DWI Courts (Faculty) Grand Rapids, Michigan Cliff Jacobs Project Manager National Center for DWI Courts Alexandria, Virginia 32 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 10:00 a.m. 10:50 a.m. Why Even Have a DWI Court? What makes a DWI offender different? Discover the History of DWI Courts and of the Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts. What makes the Guiding Principles of DWI Courts different from the Key Components of Drug Courts? Where do they overlap, and which sections are unique to DWI cases? This session is presented by contributing authors of the Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts, who will be able to explain why these principles needed to be established and why they are so important today. Discover the history of DWI Courts. Learn about the reasons why The Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts were created. Find out why the Guiding Principles are even more important today. Mike Loeffler Senior Assistant District Attorney State of Oklahoma Bristow, Oklahoma Mark Pickle Co-Founder Bernalillo Metropolitan DWI/Drug Court Albuquerque, New Mexico Find out what Fidelity to the model means. Learn why Fidelity to the Model is important for research purposes and funding purposes. Hear what Best Practice Standards are and how they apply in DWI Courts. Karen Barnes Drug Court Supervisor Maricopa County Adult Probation Phoenix, Arizona Hon. Peggy Davis Drug Court Commissioner 31st Circuit Court Springfield, Missouri Terrence Walton Treatment Branch Manager DC Pretrial Services Agency Washington, DC WEDNESDAY 11:00 a.m. 11:50 a.m. Fidelity to the Model. What is This and Why is This so Important? NCDC s expert faculty will delve into the reasons why it is so important for programs to adhere to the model as closely as possible, and in cases where complete compliance has not been achieved, why it is critical to work towards that goal. As more and more DWI Courts are implemented, competition for limited resources will mean that programs which achieve fidelity to the model and will have an increased chance to receive funding from state and federal sources. Also in this session, is an overview of Adult Drug Court Best Practice Standards Volume I, and their application in DWI Courts. Hear what lies ahead in Volume II and beyond. 33

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-5 Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices 204B Incentives and sanctions are essential tools of the Drug Court team. However, many Drug Court teams do not base their responses on scientific strategies. Over the past years, the National Drug Court Institute (NDCI) has offered topic-specific training programs for Drug Court teams after the completion of a thorough literature review of over 100 articles pertaining to shaping behavior. This session will offer an in-depth analysis of the ten science-based principles every Drug Court should consider before responding to client behavior. SESSION SB-6 Target Population: Best Practices 213A/B When implementing and operating a successful Drug Court, one of the first and most critical questions is Who will the court serve? The research is clear. Drug Courts are best designed and most successful when serving high risk/high need populations, that is, those participants with high criminogenic risk and high prognostic need. In fact, every component of your Drug Court program, from treatment to incentives/sanctions to case management will be integrally connected with targeting the appropriate population. But how do you identify high risk/high need participants? How do you ensure your program is targeting these individuals? This presentation will outline the research on high risk/ high need, and will further discuss and explain how to ensure your program targets the correct population. Understand the research behind serving high risk/ high need populations in Drug Court. Identify strategies for incorporating risk/need assessment into your Drug Court operations. Speaker Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia Identify practical applications of the ten science based principles in developing a comprehensive strategy on incentives and sanctions. Identify successful strategies for using incentives and sanctions in an Adult Drug Court. Learn the ten science-based principles of changing behavior. Hon. Christine Carpenter Circuit Court Judge 13th Judicial Circuit Columbia, Missouri Meghan Wheeler Senior Consultant National Drug Court Institute, NDCI Lexington, Ohio SESSION SB-7 HEAT 201C/D HEAT Habilitation, Empowerment & Accountability Therapy applies to a holistic, Afro centric, strength based model that emphasizes a positive and engaging approach to treatment. It is closely modeled after Afro centric interventions that have previously been standardized and published in CSAP, CSAT, and other publications. A recent CSAT grant has provided a national pilot for this innovative, manualized curriculum. The holistic approach of HEAT focuses on treating the complete person by addressing spiritual, mental, emotional, physical, environmental, and experiential factors that influence one s sense of self, behaviors, and choices. The curriculum seeks to 34 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 validate life experiences and help the client address and resolve emotional, psychological, environmental, and experiential issues that have shaped his self-image, behavior, and lifestyle choices. Understand the components of the manualized treatment model HEAT. Learn the fundamentals of how to implement the HEAT holistic approach based on a cultural foundation. Gain strategies to retain and engage difficult populations with an emphasis on African American Males in Drug Court. Darryl Turpin President Darryl Turpin Consulting Louisville, Kentucky Guy Wheeler President Guy A. Wheeler Group Plantation, Florida SESSION SB-8 Ancillary Services: Best Practices 205A/B As every Drug Court practitioner knows, program participants have a host of ancillary issues in addition to addiction. Therefore, Drug Courts must identify and target participants criminogenic and other rehabilitative needs in addition to substance abuse treatment. In doing so, Drug Courts should develop individualized case management plans identifying appropriate interventions and services that are updated as the participants needs change. This session will review the research and offer practical strategies for incorporating best practices into your Drug Court. Mary Kay Hudson Problem-solving Court Administrator Indiana Judicial Center Indianapolis, Indiana Vanessa Price Inspector/Law Enforcement Consultant NDEC-TAC-Midwest Region Director Oklahoma City, Oklahoma SESSION SB-9 America s Worst Drug Epidemic: How Did We Get Here and What Can We Do About It? 210 A/B Back by popular demand! Mr. Stutman s presentation will break down stereotypes of drug users, provide eye opening information on drugs in the US, and highlight key takeaways on how you can help fight the war on drugs in your community. Understand the shifting drug trend. The change in demographics of drug use. Pharmaceutical Drug Epidemic. How the U.S. as a society can help reverse the present trend. Speaker Robert M. Stutman Principal The Stutman Group New York, New York WEDNESDAY Understand the critical need for providing ancillary service to ensure participant success. Learn the research supporting the best practices in providing ancillary services in Drug Court. Identify strategies for incorporating evidence based practices into your Drug Court. 35

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-11 Legal Issues in Adult Drug Court: Best Practices 207 A/B Drug Courts present a myriad of legal and constitutional issues, many of which are unique and of first impression at the appellate level. Adult Drug Court Best Practices addresses many of these issues. This session will provide an overview of the Best Practices and further discuss other legal issues impacting Drug Courts and as yet unresolved in the appellate courts. Identify the legal Best Practices in Adult Drug Courts. Understand the major constitutional and legal issues impacting Drug Courts. Identify trends in appellate decisions impacting Drug Courts. SESSION SB-10 Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Trauma and Substance Abuse But Were Afraid to Ask: Now You Can! 210 C/D Often participants come to conferences with a set of questions, only some of which are answered by the speakers. At other times, presentations overlap, so that the attendee is forced to choose, thereby missing some of the material they wish to hear. This presentation will be an open forum, allowing participants to ask questions and engage in a dialogue about trauma, substance abuse, and their interaction from an expert clinician s perspective. It s your chance to get all your questions answered about trauma and substance abuse. This presentation is for all audiences. Jim Egar Chief Defender Monterey County Public Defender Salinas, California Valerie Raine Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Speaker Brian Meyer Clinical Psychologist H.H. McGuire VA Medical Center Richmond, Virginia 36 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION SB-12 Historically Disadvantaged Groups: Best Practices 204 A The Adult Drug Court Best Practice Standards state that citizens who have historically experienced sustained discrimination or reduced social opportunities because of their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, sexual identity, physical or mental disability, religion, or socioeconomic status receive the same opportunities as others. This session will explore how a Drug Court can ensure equivalent access, retention, treatment, incentives and sanctions, dispositions, and provide team training on the necessary issues. Understand the best practice standard on Historically Disadvantaged Groups. Identify strategies to ensure equivalent treatment of all persons in Drug Court. Moderator Anne Dannerbeck Janku Research Manager Office of State Courts Administrator Jefferson City, Missouri Fred Cheesman Lead Researcher National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia John Gallagher Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Social Work South Bend, Indiana Erick G. Guerrero Assistant Professor NIDA Fellow Implementation Research Institute Management, Organizations and Policy Transformation Research Cluster Co-Director School of Social Work University of Southern California Los Angeles, California SESSION SB-13 The Critical Role of the Team: Best Practices 203 A/B The Drug Court team is integral to the program s success. In order to build and maintain a successful team, training, cross-training, and participation is critical. This session will highlight the research on team training and its importance in the Drug Court, along with providing practical strategies for giving the team ongoing updates and training opportunities locally, statewide, and on the national level. Learn what the research says about full team participation and its relationship to program success. Understand the importance of training to a Drug Court team. Identify cost-effective strategies to educate and train your Drug Court team. Deborah Cima Treatment Court Coordinator Superior Court of San Berandino Drug Court Program Office San Bernardino, California Hon. Dennis Fuchs Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project Washington, DC Michael Rempel Research Director Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Richard Schwermer Assistant State Court Administrator Utah AOC Salt Lake City, Utah WEDNESDAY 37

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY Hon. Marcia Hirsch Judge Queens Treatment Court Kew Gardens, New York Eric Olson Mental Health Coordinator Bonneville County Mental Health Court Idaho Falls, Idaho SESSION SB-14 Co-Occurring Disorders: What Legal, Supervision, and Case Management Professionals Should Know 212 A/B The biggest challenge that Drug Courts are facing are addressing individuals with a substance disorder and a mental illness disorder. Many Drug Court professionals are struggling with ways to manage this population. Emerging research shows that using an integrated treatment approach can reduce re-arrests and reconviction rates with this population. This skill-building session will introduce you to the new publication co-developed by NADCP and the SAMHSA GAINS Center as well as the NDCI Training titled Addressing Co-Occurring Disorders in Drug Courts. This session will provide an overview on how Drug Courts can modify their existing programs to improve treatment, supervision and case management. Discuss why Drug Courts should address co-occurring disorders. Identify court approaches. Identify ways to adjust their case management and community supervision. Hon. Stephen Goss Judge Superior Courts of Georgia Albany, Georgia SESSION SB-15 Grant Information From a Panel of Federal Experts 204 C Are you wondering where your Drug Court can find resources in these tough economic times? Well, look no further-this is the skills building session for you. Come hear from United States Department of Justice and United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration officials as they join an experienced national Drug Court consultant to discuss funding opportunities from their agencies. Learn federal funding resources for Drug Courts. Identify key elements of a successful grant application. Jon D. Berg Public Health Advisor Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, Maryland Tim Jeffries Policy Advisor Bureau of Justice Assistance Washington, DC Gwendolyn Williams State Program Manager State and Community Development Division Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Washington, DC 38 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION SB-16 Listening to Themes: Trauma-informed Treatment 201A/B This presentation will provide an opportunity to explore general principles of treating traumatized clients in a variety of contexts (e.g., substance abuse, mental health). Basic information on trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and co-occurring disorders will be provided; such as definitions, rates and clinical presentation. In addition, key themes relevant for this population will be discussed, including disassociation, self-injury, reenactments, stage-based models of treatment, transference/counter-transference, vicarious traumatization, behavioral contracts and cognitive strategies. Trauma-informed versus traumacompetent treatment will also be highlighted. To learn basic information on trauma and PTSD. To develop increased empathy for how trauma may affect a client s recovery. To discuss typical dilemmas that may arise in various treatment settings. To learn specific strategies for responding to challenges with this population. Speaker Brenda Underhill Therapist President Underhill & Associates San Rafael, California SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS AFTERNOON SESSIONS Wednesday, May 28 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. SESSION SB-17 Real World Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension) in Specialty Courts 213 C/D Attendees will hear from national leaders on their use of VIVITROL in specialty courts. Attendees will also learn how Health Care Reform expands medication access. Attendees will learn about programs implementing VIVITROL; and how it has been made available to appropriate participants. Moderator & Speaker Melody Heaps President TASC INC Chicago, Illinois Speaker Christopher Wilkins Chief Operating Officer Loyola Recovery Foundation Pittsford, New York Panelists Specialty Court Professionals Hocking County, Ohio Specialty Court Graduate(s) This promotional program is created and sponsored by Alkermes, Inc. Christopher Wilkins and Melody Heaps are paid consultants for Alkermes, Inc. WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-18 Drug Testing: Best Practices 210 C/D Effective drug testing in Drug Court is essential to the overall success of the program. This presentation is designed for new Drug Court team members who want a comprehensive review designed to provide information and strategies for building and maintaining a successful abstinence monitoring program. Collection 39

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY strategies and result interpretation - two essential components of a credible testing program will be discussed. Attendees will learn the reasons for testing, how to select clients for maximum abstinence surveillance, and what specimens yield the best results. Additional focus issues will include controlling sample tampering and the use of creatinine measurements, the application of EtG/EtS monitoring, the challenges of on-site testing, dispelling popular drug testing myths and much more. This skills building session is intended to encourage new practitioners to know more about drug testing than their clients. Learn the best practices in drug testing to ensure the success of abstinence monitoring. Gain knowledge about different specimen types; their advantages and disadvantages. Understand how specimen tampering can defeat your abstinence monitoring efforts. Speaker Paul Cary Director Toxicology and Drug Monitoring Lab University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri SESSION SB-19 Data, Evaluation, and Fidelity to the Model: Best Practices 207A/B The research is clear: Drug Court works. But does your Drug Court work? Is your program collecting data on participants? What data? Do you have an evaluation plan? Does your court do process and outcome evaluations? This session will outline the best practices in collecting data and evaluating your Drug Court program and optimizing caseload size, ensuring that your court is keeping fidelity to the Ten Key Components. One of the critical issues discussed will be the importance of maintaining fidelity to the Drug Court model as your program grows as research demonstrates that programs tend to stray from the model at around 125 participants. A group of national experts will review the research and give practical advice on how to build a system to collect data, evaluate your Drug Court, and ensure program success. Understand the importance of collecting data and performing evaluations. How to monitor and maintain fidelity to the model in a large program. Learn strategies for implementing or enhancing data collection and evaluation in your Drug Court. Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon Norma D. Jaeger Statewide Drug Court and Mental Health Court Coordinator Idaho Supreme Court Boise, Idaho Brenidy Rice State Drug Court Coordinator/Court Program Analyst Colorado Judicial Department Denver, Colorado Jacque van Wormer Assistant Professor Washington State University Cheney, Washington 40 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION SB-20 DWI Court Forum 209 A/B This session is designed for more experienced DWI Court practitioners and for hybrid courts, or those looking to add a DWI Track to their existing Drug Court program. Those planning a DWI Court are welcome to attend. The topics for this session represent a variety of critical issues facing your programs as you look to apply evidence based research practices to the structure and design of your programs in a time of challenging budgets. We all need to be aware that mixing populations can sometimes lead to negative results, therefore it is of critical importance that we provide clinically appropriate treatment and other services designed to help the participant, not hurt them. 2:00 p.m. 2:50 p.m. The Reality and Science for Separate Treatment Tracks for Drug and DWI Offenders There are distinct and important differences in the diagnosis and treatment of alcoholics as compared to drug addicts. The presentation will offer both practical reasons and scientific support for separating alcohol dependant participants from drug addicted participants. While there are poly-substance abusers in both targeted groups the DWI offenders often bring a unique history of bio-psycho-social factors that present challenging obstacles for success, i.e. denial. The session will include the latest research on identifying alcoholism subtypes and dealing with the High Functioning Alcoholic. The training will be presented from two perspectives: that of an experienced specialty court judge who simultaneously conducted both a drug treatment court and a DWI Court for ten years and an addiction scientist, Dr. Kenneth Robinson, who will offer a scientific basis for separate tracks for drug addicts and alcoholics. The targeted audience is for those who presently operate hybrid courts (the mix of Drug Treatment Court participants and DWI offenders) and also for established drug treatment courts who wish to add DWI Court participants. The training will identify potential problems in simply enjoining the two groups and would offer a methodology for successfully accomplishing the desired goals of recovery. An explanation of both practical and scientific differences between alcohol addiction and drug addiction. Presentation of a process for establishing separate court and treatment tracks for successful recovery of alcohol addiction and drug addiction. An understanding of the special challenges for dealing with various sub-groups of alcoholics and particularly the High-Functioning-Alcoholic. Hon. Patrick Bowler Judge, ret. Consultant (faculty NCDC) Grand Rapids, Michigan Kenneth Robinson President Correctional Counseling, Inc. Germantown, Tennessee 3:00 p.m. 3:50 p.m. New Research Explores Female Drunk Drivers In 2013 the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF; www.tirf.ca) conducted a multi-state study to explore the life histories and experiences of female drunk drivers in the criminal justice system. A 2011 review of the existing literature revealed that research was outdated and that there are important gaps in WEDNESDAY 41

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY knowledge about this population and effective strategies to manage them. This presentation will inform the attendee about the study which will lead to the creation of this critically important piece of work. Unfortunately, many programs simply lump women and men together without proper consideration for the harm that could be caused in so doing. Evidence-based practice demands that a more reasoned and scientific approach is necessary when providing services to members of groups with particularized needs and characteristics. This session will at least attempt to show some of the underlying causes of female drunk driving and ways we, as practitioners, can be more competent in how we approach this underserved and often-times improperly served population. Learn about some of the underlying causes of female drunk driving. Become informed of the multi-state study which gives us evidence-based guidance in our program procedures so that we might assist rather than hinder recovery. Provide information and resources to better comprehend the differences between male and female participants as far as their treatment and other service needs are concerned. Speaker Robyn Robertson President & CEO Traffic Injury Research Foundation Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Identify ways to create a successful DWI Court program and maintain it once it is up and running. Understand the ethical issues for a DWI Court judge, when it comes to fundraising, and how to shield your judge from unethical conduct while still attracting resources. Examine what is needed to ensure sufficient funding to maintain a viable DWI Court. Consider traditional and non-traditional sources of resource collection and strategic planning. Speaker Hon. Mark Violante Judge City Court of Niagara Falls Niagara Falls, New York 4:00 p.m. 4:50 p.m. Sustainability in a World of Tight Budgets Hank Pirowski, Drug Court Coordinator, set the Gold Standard for the field as a pioneer of the Drug Court movement, particularly in the area of acquiring resources of all kinds for his program. One of the judges who worked with Hank and witnessed the amazing creativity he brought to his programs will be the presenter of this session. Being able to think outside the box is a critical skill to have, especially in a tight budgetary environment such as what we all are facing and most likely will be living with from now on. This program will explore the principles and ideas involving effective strategic planning for resource development in a difficult budgetary environment. SESSION SB-21 Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices (Repeat of the morning skills session SB-5) 204 B Incentives and sanctions are essential tools of the Drug Court team. However, many Drug Court teams do not base their responses on scientific strategies. Over the past years, the National Drug Court Institute (NDCI) has offered topic-specific training programs for Drug Court teams after the completion of a thorough literature review of over 100 articles pertaining to shaping behavior. This session will offer an in-depth analysis of the ten science-based principles every Drug Court should consider before responding to client behavior. 42 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Identify practical applications of the ten science based principles in developing a comprehensive strategy on incentives and sanctions. Identify successful strategies for using incentives and sanctions in an Adult Drug Court. Learn the ten science-based principles of changing behavior. WEDNESDAY Hon. Christine Carpenter Circuit Court Judge 13th Judicial Circuit Columbia, Missouri Meghan Wheeler Senior Consultant National Drug Court Institute, NDCI Lexington, Ohio SESSION SB-22 New Directions for Problem-Solving Courts 202 A/B Session 1 (2pm-3pm) Problem-Solving Courts: Overview and Community Court Example Session 2 (3pm-4pm) Domestic Violence, Trafficking and Prostitution Courts Session 3 (4pm-5pm) Problem-Solving Courts: The Latest Research The three sessions of this three-hour skills building workshop will explore such topics as the various problem-solving court models other than Drug Courts; the most important similarities and differences among models, including community courts, domestic violence courts, trafficking and prostitution courts; the role of evidence-based principles in problem-solving justice; what the latest research tells us about the effectiveness of these approaches; and how to learn more about starting Problem-solving Courts. Learn the common principles of problem-solving courts, and how community courts fit into the spectrum of models. Gain knowledge about the goals and key principles of domestic violence, trafficking and prostitution courts. Understand the role of evidence-based principles in problem-solving justice, and what the latest research tells us about the effectiveness of these approaches. Katie Crank Coordinator, Domestic Violence Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Michael Rempel Research Director Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Brett Taylor Deputy Director, Technical Assistance Center for Court Innovation New York, New York 43

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-24 Tribal Nations Forum 204 A Participants will have the opportunity to become acquainted with each other and the various agencies responsible for providing Training and Technical Assistance to Native American and Alaska Native Tribes. Representatives from the various T & TA agencies will give a brief overview of their agency, area of expertise, levels of assistance and their process for obtaining training and technical assistance. Healing to Wellness Courts In Action The best ideas and strategies come from the Healing to Wellness Courts themselves. This workshop will feature presentations from two operational Healing to Wellness Courts. This interactive workshop will examine the Tribal 10 Key Components, realized by actual Wellness Courts, from entry to graduation. Attendees will have the opportunity to see in practice how Wellness Court teams have creatively adapted their own programs to sustainably serve their community s needs. Learn the Tribal 10 Key Components by seeing them in action. Obtain practical advice as to how to successfully operate a Healing to Wellness Court in Indian country. Learn strategies for sustainability. Speaker Lauren Van Schilfgaarde Tribal Law Specialist Tribal Law and Policy Institute West Hollywood, California courts assist the participants successfully complete by overcoming obstacles and reintegrating into society. This presentation is a must for anyone considering a Reentry Court. Identify the characteristics of the Reentry Court target population. Understand how to integrate services into your Reentry Court. Identify strategies for building community coalitions for an effective Reentry Court. Hon. Robert Francis Judge 4-C SAFPF Reentry Court Dallas, Texas Hon. Stephen Manley Superior Court Judge Santa Clara Reentry Court San Jose, California Charles R. Robinson Chief Probation Officer - Director Travis County Community Supervision and Corrections Department Austin, Texas Hon. Keith Starrett U.S. District Judge Southern District of Mississippi Hattiesburg, Mississippi SESSION SB-25 Reentry Court on Steroids 213 A/B If you wanted to implement a Reentry Court in your community, who would the court serve? What service would the participants need? What partnerships would be crucial for your Reentry Court s success? How would you build those partnerships? In this presentation a group of national experts discuss the target population of a typical Reentry Court, along with examples of challenges facing those participants and 44 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-26 Mental Illness, Recovery, and Procedural Fairness: Challenges and New Directions for Treatment Courts 204 C Research shows that mental health courts can be effective at reducing recidivism, and many drug courts are successfully adapting their program models to improve outcomes for participants with co-occurring disorders. But research from treatment courts and changes in mental health policy and treatment approaches have raised new challenges for treatment courts working with people with mental illnesses. This interactive session will explore these challenges and new directions: SAMHSA encourages mental health providers to embrace recovery principles, but these may seem foreign and even troubling to criminal justice practitioners. What are these principles, and how can we reconcile them with criminal justice supervision? How should our growing understanding of procedural fairness affect court operations? Do the risk and needs assessment tools now being used by treatment courts give adequate consideration to concerns about violence? Which best practice for drug courts are equally applicable for courts that work with people with mental illnesses, and which are not? Understand factors associated with successful criminal justice outcomes in mental health courts. Identify SAMHSA s recovery principles and understand the potential tensions between those principles and criminal justice system goals. Understand the gaps in research relating to people with mental illness in treatment courts and where adaptations to Drug Court best practices might be considered. Carol Fisler Director, Mental Health Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Emily Gold Director New Initiatives Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Hon. Stephen Goss Judge Superior Courts of Georgia Albany, Georgia Hon. Marcia Hirsch Judge Queens Treatment Court Kew Gardens, New York 45

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-27 Heroin Resurgence and Prescription Opiates: Critical Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment 201A/B Abuse of prescription opiates is at epidemic proportions-and not coincidentally, heroin use is increasing rapidly. Emergency rooms and first responders are reporting ever increasing cases of opiate overdoses. This session will review the recent history and current state of opiate abuse and dependence in the United States, including the most current information on evidence based treatment when dealing with those addicted to opiates. how to address and manage poly-substance misuse as well as other co-morbid physical and psychiatric conditions. Finally, key factors to identify programs and providers with best practices will be summarized. Enhance drug court professionals knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding safe and effective use of medication assisted treatment of opioid dependence. Increase the flexibility of approaches for drug court professionals working to help individuals recover from opioid addiction, recognizing the importance of pharmacotherapy as the most effective strategy to prevent overdose and relapse to opioid dependence. Understand the surge in opiate use in the United States. Identify evidence based treatment for opioid dependence. Speaker Steve Hanson Director Division of Treatment and Practice Innovation Bureau of Addiction Treatment Centers Rochester, New York SESSION SB-28 The Use of Medication Assisted Treatment: What Drug Court Professionals Need to Know 205 A/B Every day in the USA, 100 people die from drug overdoses. Almost three out of four of prescription drug overdoses are caused by opioid pain relievers. The overdose deaths are rising as the rates of opioid misuse increase in the general population. Treatment of opioid addiction has an important place in preventing overdoses and regaining life functioning. This session will compare and contrast the benefits and risks of providing methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone or medication assisted-withdrawal to patients. It will review how each medication works, what induction and maintenance entails, what side effects to expect and how to manage them, what medication interact with the opioid treatment medications, ways to minimize diversion of methadone and buprenorphine, Speaker Hendree Jones Executive Director, UNC Horizons Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill, North Carolina SESSION SB-29 HEAT (Repeat of the morning skills session SB-7) 201 C/D HEAT Habilitation, Empowerment & Accountability Therapy applies to a holistic, Afro centric, strength based model that emphasizes a positive and engaging approach to treatment. It is closely modeled after Afro centric interventions that have previously been standardized and published in CSAP, CSAT, and other publications. A recent CSAT grant has provided a national pilot for this innovative, manualized curriculum. The holistic approach of HEAT focuses on treating the complete person by addressing spiritual, mental, emotional, physical, environmental, and experiential factors that influence one s sense of self, behaviors, and choices. The curriculum seeks to validate life experiences and help the client address and resolve emotional, psychological, environmental, and experiential issues that have shaped his self-image, behavior, and lifestyle choices. Understand the components of the manualized treatment model HEAT. 46 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Learn the fundamentals of how to implement the HEAT holistic approach based on a cultural foundation. Gain strategies to retain and engage difficult populations with an emphasis on African American Males in Drug Court. Darryl Turpin President Darryl Turpin Consulting Louisville, Kentucky Guy Wheeler President Guy A. Wheeler Group Plantation, Florida SESSION SB-30 Tested and Proven Utilization of Recovery Support Specialists as a Key Engagement and Retention Strategy in FDC (and Beyond) 203 A/B What impact can a recovery coach or recovery support specialists have within an FDC program? According to research, the use of recovery coaches has a positive impact on multiple outcomes, including substance use, mental health, parenting practices, and family functioning outcomes. In addition, the use of recovery coaches significantly increase parents access to substance abuse treatment, stay in treatment, and increase likelihood that parents will be reunified with their children. This workshop presentation will review available outcome data regarding implementation of this key strategy by FDCs and the opportunities for implementation outside of FDC by the larger CWS system. Key considerations for hiring, training, and funding these positions will also be explored. Yesenia Campos Recovery Support Specialist Pima County Family Drug Court Tucson, Arizona Anne Chamberlin Program Manager Pima County Family Drug Court Tucson, Arizona Jocelyn Gainers Executive Director The Family Recovery Program, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland Deborah Geiger Program Supervisor Family Recovery Program, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland Andy Mendoza Recovery Support Specialist Pima County Juvenile Court Center, Family Drug Court Tucson, Arizona Tianna Roye Deputy Director Bridges Inc, STARS Program Sacramento, California Nancy Young Executive Director Children and Family Futures Irvine, California WEDNESDAY Re-consider perceptions of client-readiness and recognize importance of RRS role in promoting client engagement within FDC. Learn about positive outcomes demonstrated by RSS model. Learn key considerations and practical solutions for hiring, training, and funding RSS positions. 47

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court WEDNESDAY SESSION SB-31 Recovery Strategies in the Drug Court Environment 212 A/B 2:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. Recovery in the Drug Court Environment Will describe the need to move from an acute care Drug Court model to a chronic care model, defining and describing recovery management and recovery oriented systems of care and how the new standards must be considered in this context, and an introduction to evidence based recovery strategies. 3:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Evidence-based Recovery Strategies Will describe evidence-based practices and the research behind them, e.g. recovery management check-up, telephone follow-up both passive and active and peer mentoring/coaches. 4:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. The Reality of Recovery Strategies during and after Drug Court Recovery Mentors (Vermont Drug Court), Recovery Management Check-up (Montana Drug Court) and Telephone Follow-up Understand the implications of alcohol and drug dependency as a chronic care brain disease. Become aware of evidence-based practices that positively impact relapse and reoffense during and after Drug Court. Learn how to implement evidence-based recovery strategies in your own Drug Court. Jeffrey Kushner Statewide Drug Court Administrator Supreme Court of Montana Victor, Montana Kathryn McCollister Associate Professor Department of Public Health Sciences University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida Paul L. Scudo Recovery Support Specialist CeDAR -Center for Dependency, Addiction and Rehabilitation University of Colorado Hospital Denver, Colorado Shelley Thomson Coordinator 13th Judicial District Drug Court Victor, Montana SESSION SB-32 Supervision 210 A/B Probation and law enforcement have an indispensable role in a successful Drug Court. Community supervision is critical to ensure participants adhere to the rules of Drug Court. This session will discuss the role of law enforcement and probation in providing robust supervision for your Drug Court participants. Issues discussed will include, but not be limited to, home visits, drug tests in the field, bench warrants, bar sweeps, and the role of the supervision officer in staffing and court. Understand the role of the supervision officer in Drug Court. Identify strategies for successful community supervision. Vanessa Price Inspector/Law Enforcement Consultant NDEC-TAC-Midwest Region Director Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 48 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

Thursday Schedule of Events Thursday, May 29 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Drug Court Expo Open with Continental Breakfast Exhibition Hall A 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration (closed during Opening Ceremony) Convention Center Lobby A 8:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Opening Ceremony Arena 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Hall Open Exhibition Hall A 10:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. Concurrent Workshops, Session A 11:45 a.m. 1:15 p.m. Concessions for Purchase in Drug Court Expo Exhibition Hall A 1:15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. Concurrent Workshops, Session B 2:30 p.m. 2:45 p.m. Break 2:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Concurrent Workshops, Session C 4:00 p.m. 4:15 p.m. Break 4:15 p.m. 5:30 p.m. Concurrent Workshops, Session D 5:45 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Membership Meeting Marquis Northeast, Marriott 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo and Dessert Reception Exhibition Hall A 8:00 p.m. Justice For Vets Benefit Concert featuring The American Vinyl All Star Band (Doors open at 7:00 p.m.) Arena Thursday

Notes

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 ARENA Thursday, May 29 8:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. OPENING CEREMONY Presentation of the Colors Color Guard Detail for 5th Battalion 14th Marines National Anthem Tim Murray Executive Director Pretrial Justice Institute Chuck Noerenberg President National Alliance for Drug Endangered Children THURSDAY Welcoming Remarks West Huddleston NADCP Chief Executive Officer Alexandria, Virginia Featured Jonathan Blodgett National District Attorneys Association Michael Botticelli Acting Director Office of National Drug Control Policy The Hon. Jerry Brown Governor, California Invited Dr. Westley Clark Director Center for Substance Abuse Treatment The Hon. Nathan Deal Governor, Georgia Denise O Donnell Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Matthew Perry Actor All Rise Ambassador Former Congressman Jim Ramstad (R) Minnesota Denise Richards Actress Martin Sheen Actor, All Rise Ambassador Ambassador Paul E. Simons Executive Secretary Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission of the Organization of American States Parade of Transformation Michelle Leonhart Director Drug Enforcement Administration Invited 51

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY TRACK SESSION A Thursday, May 29 10:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. SESSION A-1 Ten Key Components and the Research 201 A/B How can you use the Ten Key Components as a foundation for building a more successful Drug Court? What research has been done on the effectiveness of Drug Court and the use of the Ten Key Components? Come hear how to integrate the Components into the court structure and how to help your court conform to best practices, along with examples of forms and documents utilized by the Drug Court. Gain awareness of the Ten Key Components, how they provide the structure for a court and what documents and forms are necessary for Drug Courts to achieve the performance benchmarks connected to the Components. Learn about the research done on the Ten Key Components and Drug Court effectiveness. Hon. Christine Carpenter Circuit Court Judge 13th Judicial Circuit Columbia, Missouri Juliette Mackin Vice President / Senior Research Associate Northwest Professional Consortium, Inc. (NPC Research) Portland, Oregon SESSION A-2 Parents are Adults Too--Implementing Adult Best Practices in Family Drug Courts: Bridging Opportunities for System Change and Program Fidelity 201 C Are you implementing best practices in your Family Drug Court? In 1997, the Office of Justice Programs of the U.S. Department of Justice identified 10 key components of drug courts, providing jurisdictions with a framework for developing and refining their drug courts programs for criminal offenders with substance use disorders. Most recently, Children and Family Futures released Family Drug Court Guidelines to help states and programs create practice and systems changes that will have a listing impact on FDCs and the families they serve. This workshop session will examine where the 10 Key Components converge with the 10 FDC Guidelines and where they also diverge. The presentation will also explore how to use best practices to implement both practice-level and systemslevel change. Explore the need and development of FDC Guidelines and how they converge and diverge with 10 Key Adult Drug Court Components and Adult Drug Court standards. Gain understanding how FDC Guidelines are aimed at both practice-level and systems-level change and why you can t have an effective FDC unless system changes are made. Learn how states and local jurisdictions can use FDC Guidelines and strategies to improve FDC practice. Phil Breitenbucher FDC Program Director Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon 52 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION A-3 Sixteen Strategies and Effective Practice in Juvenile Drug Courts 201 D Adherence to the Sixteen Strategies of Juvenile Drug Courts is critical for good outcomes. But what are the 16 Strategies? How does a Juvenile Drug Court (JDC) operationalize the strategies? What does the research say on the need to adhere to the strategies? This session will outline the 16 Strategies, review the research on their necessity for good outcomes, and provide concrete suggestions on how to incorporate the strategies into JDC operations. New JDC professionals will be introduced to the 16 strategies in Practice and learn how these practices are important to juvenile. Veteran JDC professionals will learn about practical solutions regarding the 16 Strategies in Practice, which include sample case. Participants will learn how to implement these frameworks within their own programs. SESSION A-4 Mental Health Courts A-Z 202 A/B The CSG Justice Center has provided training and technical assistance to Mental Health Court grantees for over a decade, and in 2013 released a new, free curriculum, Developing A Mental Health Court: An Interdisciplinary Curriculum <http://learning.csgjusticecenter.org/>, that includes online presentations and resources and live group activities to help jurisdictions interested in Mental Health Courts. Programs across the country are already using this resource to plan and improve their programs, as well as supplement existing training options for free. This session will use this resource to teach participants about key issues in deciding whether to start a mental health court, designing a mental health court, and operating and sustaining a Mental Health Court. Understand the ten essential elements of Mental Health Court programs and how these key design characteristics have been implemented in different program models. Use the curriculum to think through how to incorporate the essential elements when designing and implementing their programs. Describe how several particularly complex elements (e.g., developing a target population and monitoring adherence to court requirements through incentives and sanctions) apply to their own programs and identify potential program modifications/ enhancements to align with available research. Speaker Hallie Fader-Towe Courts Policy Analyst Council of State Governments Justice Center New York, New York THURSDAY Speaker Jacque van Wormer Assistant Professor Washington State University Cheney, Washington 53

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION A-5 What Juvenile Drug Courts Need to Know About Providing Effective Services for Youth With Co-Occuring Disorders 203 A/B Evidence suggests more than half of all youth in contact with the juvenile justice system have a diagnosable mental or substance use disorder, with the majority experiencing both. Youth with co-occurring disorders have multiple and complex symptom patterns and behaviors raising unique challenges for juvenile courts. These youth typically: are more difficult to engage in treatment and have higher treatment dropout rates; have more severe symptoms; use substances earlier, more frequently and over a longer period of time; and have more serious and complex family issues. To effectively address the needs of these youth, juvenile courts should use integrated screening, assessment, and treatment planning processes that attend to both the substance use and mental health needs. This is best accomplished when service providers, trained in both substance abuse and mental health services, develop a single plan to address both sets of conditions. However, most often treatment for adolescents with co- occurring disorders is delivered either in a sequential manner, where one type of treatment follows the other, or in a parallel fashion, where both services are delivered in the same period but by different providers. This presentation will provide an overview of the research and describe the national context for the movement towards integrated treatment. The presenters will describe a real-world approach the Integrated Co-occurring Treatment (ICT) model to addressing the needs of court-involved youth with co-occurring disorders. ICT, an intensive community-based method of service delivery, provides a comprehensive and integrated set of mental health and substance use treatments to youth with co-occurring disorders and their families. ICT has been implemented within juvenile specialty courts with promising results. Finally, this session will provide attendees with guidance on how to develop capacity in their own communities to provide integrated, effective treatment for youth in JDCs with co-occurring disorders. Sponsored by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Increase understanding and awareness of the impact co-occurring disorders in youth has on JDC participation. Review the most current research on effective, integrated interventions for youth with co-occurring disorders. Learn about an integrated treatment model that works with court-diverted youth. Robert T. Kinscherff Senior Associate National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice at Policy Research Associates, Inc. Delmar, New York Rick Shepler Senior Research Associate Center for Innovative Practices at the Begun Center for Violence Prevention, MSASS, Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio 54 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION A-6 Cultural Competency 101: An Introduction 204 A Cultural competency in the courts is not an event but an ongoing process that should be the foundation of the court s system. Many Drug Courts struggle with issues of culture competency and how to incorporate culture into their court. This session explores the basics of culture, what should be considered in development from policies and procedures, to handbooks to community partners and service providers. Research consistently reports the benefits of cultural competence in service delivery and Drug Courts are no different. This session responds to concerns from Drug Courts across the country and provides concrete strategies and next steps that you can use to become more culturally aware. Identify three strategies focused on culture to include in your court. Explore ways to reflect culture within policy and procedures. Introduce a cultural checklist to use within your court. Speaker Susan James-Andrews President and CEO James-Andrews and Associates Mitchellville, Maryland SESSION A-7 Statewide Outcome and Cost-Benefit Analysis Lessons Learned 204 C Undertaking a statewide outcome and cost-benefit analysis takes planning and preparation to ensure you have collected the right data. What data should you collect and how do you conduct a methodologically sound outcome and cost-benefit analysis of Adult Drug Courts? This session will outline the best practices in evaluation and highlight Virginia s experience with a 12 site outcome and cost-benefit analysis of adult felony Drug Courts. This presentation will also discuss the significant findings from the study. Identify how a state can approach a statewide outcome and cost-benefit analysis of Adult Drug Courts. Identify data required to conduct an outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Identify promising practices for Adult Drug Courts. Fred Cheesman Lead Researcher National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia Tara Kunkel Principal Court Management Consultant National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia Anna Powers Drug Treatment Court Coordinator Supreme Court of Virginia Richmond, Virginia SESSION A-8 Cocaine 204 B Cocaine, used for centuries to alter consciousness, and popular since the 1980s in its rock or crack form, has been a plague on its users, criminal justice systems and the treatment community for years. However, in many jurisdictions, crack has been falling in popularity compared to meth and newer club drugs. Over the last century, cocaine has seen surges and ebbs in popularity. Research on cocaine dependence and cocaine s impact on the brain has contributed greatly to the treatment of cocaine addiction. Come learn about cocaine, it s impact on the brain, and the current strategies in treatment. Speaker Steve Hanson Director Division of Treatment and Practice Innovation, Bureau of Addiction Treatment Centers Rochester, New York THURSDAY 55

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION A-9 Critical Role of Risk/Need in Building Incentives and Sanctions 207 C/D The research is clear: Drug Courts should focus on individuals with high prognostic risks and criminogenic needs. But how does dealing with someone who has high risk/needs impact how your court delivers incentives and sanctions? What if you mix lower risk and needs populations with higher risk and needs populations? Will your incentives and sanctions have the same impact? This session discusses the importance of risk/need assessment and its relationship to delivering effective incentives and sanctions in your Drug Court. Identify the relationship between prognostic risk, criminogenic need, and incentives/sanctions. Understand how to effectively deliver incentives and sanctions to a high risk/high need population. Speaker Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia SESSION A-10 Supervision to Support Recovery and Public Safety 206 A/B Community supervision is primarily about public safety. Community supervision in the field sharply increases success rates of participants. Often, officers are taught to catch participants doing wrong. In fact, it is critically important for officers to catch participants doing right. Officers who do field supervision can enhance the outcomes of the Court and participants by understanding the critical issues of monitoring the recovery environment, and knowing how to administer immediate incentives and sanctions in the field. Fast paced, and entertaining, the class will teach officers what to look for and what to do when they detect both desired and undesired behaviors in the community setting. Attendees will learn what a recovery environment is, and what to do about it. Attendees will learn how to catch participants doing something right and to use behavior modification principles effectively. Attendees will learn innovative ways that participants hide banned substances. Speaker Helen Harberts Deputy District Attorney (ret.) Chico, California 56 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 THURSDAY SESSION A-11 Trauma Informed Approaches: A Judicial Perspective 210 D A large percentage of Drug Court participants suffer from one or a series of traumatic experiences. While there is an increased emphasis on trauma-informed care from the aspect of the treatment provider, the judge should also be aware of trauma and its impact on participants. In this session four judges who are national experts on trauma informed responses from the bench will address how they respond and talk with Latino participants who are suffering from trauma. Understand the impact of trauma in Latino populations. Identify strategies for integrating trauma informed responses from the bench. Hon. Robert Anchondo Criminal Court Judge DWI Drug Court Intervention and Treatment Program El Paso County, Texas Hon. Jo Ann Ferdinand Judge Brooklyn Treatment Court Brooklyn, New York Hon. Marcia Hirsch Judge Queens Treatment Court Kew Gardens, New York SESSION A-12 HEAT Update 205 A/B This promising practice was introduced at the 2012 conference in Nashville and the preliminary results are in! Habilitation, Empowerment & Accountability Therapy (HEAT) applies a holistic, Afro centric, strength-based model that emphasizes a positive and engaging approach to treatment. It is closely modeled after Afro centric interventions that have previously been standardized and published in CSAP, CSAT and other publications (e. g., Burnett, 2008; Goddard, 1993; Philleo et al., 1997). This session provides an overview of this manualized approach to providing services in Drug Court. Darryl Turpin President Darryl Turpin Consulting Louisville, Kentucky Guy Wheeler President Guy A. Wheeler Group Plantation, Florida 57

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION A-13 Implementing and Supporting Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network 208 A/B Creating trauma-informed child and family service systems has been an integral focus of the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) since its inception in 2001. The juvenile justice system, in particular, has been strategically targeted due to the strikingly high prevalence of trauma exposure and traumatic stress among justice-involved youth. A critical step in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems is to understand the key elements and best practices of a trauma-informed juvenile justice system. In February 2013, the NCTSN took this step by convening the Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Roundtable, which included trauma experts and key stakeholders, as well as clinicians, supervisors, and juvenile justice staff that provide services to youth in various juvenile justice settings across the country. As part of the Roundtable, five national experts in juvenile justice were assembled to advance our objective of developing the key elements and best practices of a trauma-informed juvenile justice system. Each expert addressed one of the following elements: disproportionate minority contact, environment of care, trauma-informed assessment and interventions, cross-system collaboration, as well as youth and family community partnerships. Included in the panel of presenters, was a youth representative with previous involvement in the juvenile justice system, who significantly contributed to the objective of this Roundtable meeting. This workshop will 1) review these essential elements of a trauma-informed juvenile justice system, 2) identify best practice examples that speak to each element, and 3) provide a platform for a youth representative to highlight their perspective in creating a trauma-informed juvenile justice system. This workshop will encourage active discussion from the audience and offer a variety of online resources that can support the adoption of trauma-informed juvenile justice best practices including five new NCTSN practice briefs that were produced as a result of this Roundtable meeting. Sponsored by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Participants will learn key elements in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems. Participants will be able to identify best practice examples associated with key elements of traumainformed juvenile justice. Participants will have a better understanding of the crucial role of youth engagement in informing best practices. Steve Avalos Youth Mentor Homeboy Industries Los Angeles, California Kelly Decker Service Systems Program Coordinator National Center for Child Traumatic Stress Los Angeles, California Carly Dierkhising Special Projects Manager, Juvenile Justice National Center for Child Traumatic Stress Los Angeles, California 58 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION A-14 San Diego Specialty Court Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extendedrelease injectable suspension) 210 A/B Attendees will hear from San Diego leaders on their use of VIVITROL in their specialty court. Attendees will learn about programs implementing VIVITROL; and how it has been made available to appropriate participants. Speaker Christopher Wilkins Chief Operating Officer Loyola Recovery Foundation Pittsford, New York Panelists San Diego Specialty Court Professionals San Diego Graduate This promotional program is created and sponsored by Alkermes, Inc. Christopher Wilkins is a paid speaker for Alkermes, Inc. SESSION A-16 The Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts 210 C This session gives an overview of the principles which make DWI Courts different enough to merit specialized practices. The Key Components of Drug Court have not gone away in DWI Courts but rather have been supplemented by the Guiding Principles. Fidelity to the DWI Court model includes both documents as fundamental to the success of these programs. The presenters are national experts on DWI Courts and bring a wealth of knowledge and experience to the topic. Hon. Michael Barrasse Presiding Judge Lackawanna County Veterans Treatment Court Scranton, Pennsylvania Hon. J. Michael Kavanaugh (ret.) Senior Director National Center for DWI Courts Alexandria, Virginia THURSDAY SESSION A-15 Is it Heroin or Prescription Drugs? 209 A/B Always a crowd favorite! Dr. Kadehjian s presentation will discuss the growing heroin epidemic in the U.S. and provide insight into how testing directly for heroin (6-Acetylmorphine) will help you distinguish heroin use from pain medication. Statistics of Opiate Use. Importance of Distinguishing Heroin vs. Prescription Opiates. Detection of Heroin and the accuracy of 6-Acetlymorphine (encompasses cross reactivity, cut-off levels, accuracy, etc). Speaker Leo Kadehjian Biomedical Consultant Palo Alto, California 59

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION A-17 Procedural Justice: Improving Court Outcomes Through Enhanced Perceptions of Fairness 207A/B A key finding from research on the effectiveness of Drug Courts and other problem-solving courts has been the role of defendant perceptions of the judge and the court process. The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation published by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), the Urban Institute s Justice Policy Center, RTI International, and the Center for Court Innovation found that more effective Drug Courts had judges whose interactions with defendants were respectful, fair, and knowledgeable. This translates into concrete wins for Drug Courts: reduced drug use and reduced future offending. These findings are consistent with a robust body of research demonstrating that when litigants believe the court process is fair, they are more likely to comply with court orders and the law generally. The concept called procedural justice includes several key dimensions, including treating litigants with respect, ensuring their understanding of court procedures, and providing an opportunity to be heard. This presentation will provide snapshot of relevant procedural justice research, including the findings from the Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation as well as parallel research in other criminal justice contexts, such as with policing, corrections, and re-entry. Faculty will also showcase available practitioner tools for improving litigant perceptions of fairness in an effort to improve court outcomes. For example, audience members will be invited to participate in interactive exercises and demonstrations from a one-day training curriculum called Enhancing Procedural Fairness developed by the Center for Court Innovation, the National Judicial College, and the U.S. Department of Justice s Bureau of Justice Assistance. Judge Kevin Burke will also describe similar training work he s conducted nationally. The presentation will conclude with a hands-on exploration of how litigant perceptions of fairness can be appropriately tracked. Researchers will explain how user end surveys, courtroom observation, and other evaluation methods can help courts self-assess procedural justice. Define the key elements of procedural justice and outline relevant research findings. Describe and practice enhanced communication strategies through interactive exercises and demonstrations. Explore available self-assessment tools to measure litigant perceptions of fairness. Hon. Kevin Burke Judge Hennepin County District Court Minneapolis, Minnesota Emily Gold Deputy Director, Planning Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Michael Rempel Research Director Center for Court Innovation New York, New York 60 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION A-18 The New ASAM Criteria: Implications for Drug Courts and Treatment Providers 213 C/D The ASAM Criteria are the most widely used guidelines for intake, assessment, service planning and placement, continued stay and discharge of patients with addictive disorders. A new edition was published in October 2013. This presentation will update participants on what is new since the last edition ASAM PPC-2R, 2001. It will highlight the implications for the assessment (linkage with criminogenic factors), care planning and treatment of criminal justice clients in Drug Courts and Mental Health Courts. There will be discussion of how to use The ASAM Criteria to facilitate multi-system partnerships to enhance public safety, reduce the revolving door through the criminal justice and treatment systems and improve recovery outcomes. Identify what is new in the new edition of The ASAM Criteria and how it interfaces with criminal justice settings. Apply The ASAM Criteria to cases and situations in the interface with Drug Courts and treatment providers. Discuss how The ASAM Criteria can facilitate multi-system partnerships to enhance public safety and decrease crime. SESSION A-19 Incorporating Native Culture and Tradition 211 B A participant s healing often includes re-integration into the community and re-integration with one s self. Cultural resources can be used to ground the self, reconnect with lost custom, and develop spiritual and cultural meaning that may have been lost or disregarded. Incorporation of culture into Drug Court or Healing to Wellness Court programming can take a variety of forms, from including cultural activities into the sanctions and incentives, to having a Wellness Court tribal name, to embedding treatment phases with cultural significance. Incorporation of custom and tradition can be especially important for Native participants, who often stem from a different worldview than that offered in standard Drug Court settings. This workshop will explore this different worldview, and strategies for incorporating custom and tradition into both Tribal Healing to Wellness Court and into State Drug Court programs. Examine Native history and differing worldview. Learn different strategies for including custom and tradition into programming. Learn some of the do s and don ts concerning custom and tradition within Drug Court. THURSDAY Speaker David Mee-Lee Senior Vice President The Change Companies Carson City, Nevada Donna Humetewa-Kaye Program Manager Nakwatsvewat Institute Hotevilla, Arizona Hon. Korey Wahwassuck Associate Judge and Consultant Leech Lake Tribal Court & Tribal Law and Policy Institute Cass Lake, Minnesota 61

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION A-20 Five Ways to Wreck Your Career: Ethics for Treatment Providers 212 A/B Treatment professionals are tasked with assisting individuals whose substance involvement has left them temporarily vulnerable to exploitation, coercion, enmeshment, and a variety of other perils. In many respects those involved in the criminal justice system are especially at-risk as the power balance between participant and helper is tilted heavily to the helper. This reality places a special burden on practitioners to structure programs and practices to encourage ethical conduct. However even the well-intentioned may find themselves in sticky situations that threaten careers, families, and reputations. This interactive presentation will provide strategies for recognizing and resolving vexing ethical dilemmas. Understand the dynamics of ethical conduct and misconduct when providing Drug Court treatment. Identify the five most common ethical pitfalls facing providers and how to navigate around them. Identify how treatment providers can ethically collaborate and communicate with Drug Court team members, while respecting the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Speaker Terrence Walton Director of Treatment DC Pre-Trial Services Agency Washington, DC SESSION A-21 Incorporating Criminogenic Risks/Needs, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Needs to Reduce Recidivism and Promote Recovery 213 B Adults with Behavioral Health Needs under Correctional Supervision: A Shared Framework for Reducing Recidivism and Promoting Recovery was supported by the National Institute of Corrections, Bureau of Justice Assistance, and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration as an effort to bring together the latest research in a framework for policymakers, administrators, and service providers committed to improving outcomes for the large number of adults with mental health and substance use disorders that cycle through the criminal justice system. It introduces an evidence-based framework for prioritizing scarce resources based on assessments of individuals risk of committing a future crime and their treatment and support needs. The report, developed by the Council of State Governments Justice Center in partnership with the Association of State Correctional Administrators, National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors, and American Probation and Parole Association outlines the principles and practices of the substance abuse, mental health, and corrections systems and proposes a structure for state and local agencies to build collaborative responses. This session will introduce the Criminal Justice/Behavioral Health Framework and provide guidance on how its research-based principles should inform program design and implementation, including considerations for selecting an appropriate target population, implementing and using appropriate screening and assessment for criminogenic risks/needs, substance abuse, and mental health, and coordinating planning across different programmatic interventions. Speaker Fred Osher Director of Health Systems and Services Policy CSG Justice Center Washington, DC 62 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION A-22 Marketing Your Drug Court to Local Officials 213 A The day-to-day management of a Drug Court can be a challenge. But while there is training for coordinators and judges on program management, what about training for administrators and others who are not the day-to-day managers? This session will focus on looking at your Drug Court program from the perspective of an administrator, local government official or local/state legislator. This session will discuss what budgetary, programmatic, data and outcome measures is needed by those who provide broad administrative or budgetary oversight of a Drug Court program. In short, this session is what those on the outside need to know about your program in order to be supportive and invested in its success. Topics covered will include using media updates to share successes, restating the need to rely on standards, effectively using performance measures, discussing your budget needs the right way, knowing how to share bad performance or program setbacks and investing outsiders in the success of the program. Learn how to market your program to those with administrative or budgetary oversight of a Drug Court. Learn how to craft the right kind of presentation to local officials. Learn what performance measures matter to local officials. SESSION A-23 Los Mejor Estándares de Práctica e Investigación 211 A La investigación es clara. Tribunales de drogas son la intervención más efi caz en la historia de la justicia penal de alto riesgo / alta necesidad casos. Pero que específi camente dice la investigación para nosotros como los profesionales? En esta sesión se revisarán los puntos críticos en la literatura de Tribunal de Drogas, al mismo tiempo integrando que la investigación con las nuevas versiones estándares de mejores prácticas de de los tribunales de drogas para adultos. Conocer los fundamentos de la investigación en los tribunales de drogas para adultos. Identifi car los estándares de mejores prácticas relacionadas con la investigación. Aplicar los estandares de mejores prácticas relacionadas con la investigación. Hon. Rogelio R. Flores Superior Court Judge Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara Santa Maria, California Alfredo Villalba Alcohol and Drug Program Specialist County of San Diego Health and Human Services San Diego, California THURSDAY Speaker Tracy BeMent District Court Administrator 10th Judicial District Athens, Georgia Meghan Wheeler Senior Consultant National Drug Court Institute, NDCI Lexington, Ohio 63

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY TRACK SESSION B Thursday, May 29 1:15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. SESSION B-1 Building a Multi-Disciplinary Team 201 A/B True collaboration continually proves to be one of the greatest challenges for stakeholders in the Problem Solving Courts. This presentation will cover how defense attorneys and prosecutors can lay down their gloves in a successful Drug Court augmenting traditional practice with a more holistic approach that balances acceptance of responsibility with rehabilitation and mitigation of punishment. Collaboration, team building and the theater of the Therapeutic Justice Environment increases successful outcomes for defendants and reduces recidivism. Discuss the benefits of buying-in to the therapeutic justice model for the prosecutor and defense attorney. Learn how to create an effective collaboration between stakeholders. Learn techniques to build a cohesive treatment team. Hon. Rogelio R. Flores Superior Court Judge Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara Santa Maria, California Amy Lopez Drug Court Coordinator County of Santa Barbara ADMHS Santa Maria, California Maria Rose Martino Deputy Public Defender Santa Barbara County Public Defenders Office Santa Maria, California SESSION B-2 Closed Doors or Welcome Mat? Opening the Way for Medically Assisted Treatment in FDC 201 C Many FDCs are excluding clients who are taking prescribed medication to address a co-occurring mental health diagnosis, chronic or acute pain condition, or substance use disorder. There a myriad of practice and policy concerns expressed by FDC teams surrounding this issue thus raising the need for thoughtful guidance, greater awareness, continuing education regarding medical-assisted treatment (MAT). The convergence of various trends, including the advent of new medications for substance use disorders highlight the need for greater understanding of MAT for FDC programs. This workshop presentation will provide an overview of medication assisted treatment and explore key considerations for as a way to opening the doors for this population. Practice and policy examples and implications for collaborative practice between CWS, treatment, and the Courts will be presented. Gain understanding of medical-assisted treatment, including trends and availability of new medications for substance use disorders. Discuss practice and policy concerns and barriers in serving MAT clients and explore key considerations to opening doors for this population in FDCs. Explore a collaborative framework between child welfare, treatment, and the courts and the need for additional partnerships to serve MAT population. Penny Clodfelter Program Manager Family Drug Court Kansas City, Missouri Hendree Jones Executive Director, UNC Horizons Professor Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UNC School of Medicine Chapel Hill, North Carolina Nancy Young Executive Director Children and Family Futures Irvine, California 64 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION B-3 Forming a Lasting Partnership Between the Courts and Treatment 201 D Successful interventions for substance abusing youth involved in the court system must include a true partnership between the court system and their substance abuse treatment providers. This panel discussion will give the participants an opportunity to pose questions to expert faculty regarding how to make this partnership stronger; how to coordinate treatment and court responses to drug testing; how to share case planning; and how to engage youth and families in the treatment process. Sponsored by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Participants will learn how to build lasting relationships between treatment and the court. Participants will learn how to coordinate responses from the court and treatment providers. Participants will be able to ask targeted questions regarding their own challenges. Hon. Anthony Capizzi Judge Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio Latonya Harris Juvenile Drug Court Coordinator Lucas County Juvenile Drug Court Toledo, Ohio Karen Olnhausen Mental Health & Recovery Services Toledo, Ohio Joe Thomas III Family Service Specialist Ninth Judicial Circuit Court Kalamazoo, Michigan SESSION B-4 Evaluating Your Mental Health Court 202 A/B Mental Health Courts need to provide a strong justification for why they should be funded. In Oklahoma, the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services has developed a web-based system to collect performance and outcome measures. This session will include a brief demonstration of the web system and specifically the reports produced from the system. Furthermore, the presenters will discuss how Mental Health Courts can perform their own evaluations on a number of best practice standards including: underserved populations, outcomes by demographics, participant drugs of choice, participant diagnosis. Finally, the presenters will document the performance and outcome measures utilized in Oklahoma and will explain strategies used to make improvements in outcomes and how the courts with the best outcomes are recognized at the State Capitol. To understand performance and outcome measures and how these measures can be utilized by courts to evaluate their own programs. Learn strategies that make significant improvements in courts and what difference this made in the lives of the participants. Learn the advantages of the web-based system that is used to collect Mental Health Court performance and outcome measures. Richard S. Underwood Criminal Justice Specialist OK Dept of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Nancy Warren Data Analyst III OK Dept of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Nisha Wilson Director of Specialty Courts OK Dept of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Oklahoma City, Oklahoma David Wright Research/Evaluation OK Dept of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Oklahoma City, Oklahoma THURSDAY 65

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION B-5 Review of NDCI s New Curriculum on Best Practices with Co-Occurring Populations 203 A/B The biggest challenge that Drug Courts are facing are addressing individuals with a substance disorder and a mental illness disorder. Many Drug Court professionals are struggling with ways to manage this population. Emerging research shows that using an integrated treatment approach can reduce re-arrests and reconviction rates with this population. This module is an overview of the training and starts the discussion on how Drug Courts can develop an action plan to modify their existing programs or develop specialized tracks to meet the need of this population. Discuss why Drug Courts should address co-occurring disorders. Learn what is needed to modify their programs. Speaker Hon. Stephen Goss Judge Superior Courts of Georgia Albany, Georgia Learn about the history of tribes and Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts. Learn strategies for collaboration between sovereigns. Learn strategies for working with Native participants with State Drug Court. Speaker Lauren Van Schilfgaarde Tribal Law Specialist Tribal Law and Policy Institute West Hollywood, California SESSION B-6 How to Effectively Work with Native Participants 204 A State and tribal courts stem from separate sovereigns and different histories, enforce different laws, and serve different, yet often overlapping populations. Similarly, Native participants have different histories and worldviews. Recognition of these differences, however, can strengthen rather than diminish the services that we provide. This workshop will explore the history that informs Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts, potential benefits to both Tribal Wellness Courts and State Drug Courts from collaboration, strategies for collaboration, and specific examples of successful collaboration that include written referral agreements, joint team members, cultural consultants, and joint courts. In addition, this workshop will explore strategies for working with Native participants within a State Drug Court, including cultural competency. SESSION B-7 Visual Performance Feedback in Drug Court: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words 204 C In a time when PowerPoint images are used to augment everything from grade school presentations to congressional testimony, it is striking that similar visual aids have not been examined as a means to improve communication between Drug Court judges and clients in the court room. This workshop describes a novel visual performance feedback procedure in which clients receive graphic feedback on their progress (i.e., drug abstinence and treatment attendance) during their regularly scheduled judicial status hearings. The judge orients clients to the graphs and identifies positive and negative behaviors as well as patterns of behavior (e.g., monthly binges) using a laser pointer to direct clients attention. We will discuss findings from our NIDA-funded study that examines the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the procedure in an urban misdemeanor Drug Court. The procedure 66 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 is designed to (1) improve clients understanding of the link between their behavior and judicially-imposed consequences, (2) enhance the quality of interactions between the judge and clients, and (3) improve clients perceptions of fairness and procedural justice. The visual performance feedback procedure has the potential to change the manner in which judicial status hearings are conducted in Drug Courts and other Problemsolving Courts. This innovative procedure applies the age-old adage, a picture is worth a thousand words, to improve the efficacy of Drug Courts. Appreciate the importance of communication in effective behavior modification. Understand the role of procedural justice and fairness in improving client outcomes. Learn how to deliver visual performance feedback. Karen Dugosh Research Scientist Treatment Research Institute Philadelphia, Pennsylvania David Festinger Senior Scientist Treatment Research Institute Philadelphia, Pennsylvania SESSION B-8 Alcohol 204 B Neuroimaging has yielded new evidence about the effects on the brain of alcohol use. This presentation will focus on those new findings as well as describe the psychopharmacology of alcohol use from both an acute and chronic use perspective. The session will also discuss the implications of this research on the treatment for alcohol dependency. Speaker Kenneth Robinson President Correctional Counseling, Inc. Germantown, Tennessee SESSION B-9 Fundamentals of Incentives and Sanctions in Adult Drug Court 207 C/D Incentives and sanctions are essential tools of the Drug Court team. However, many Drug Court teams do not base their responses on scientific strategies. Over the past years, the National Drug Court Institute (NDCI) has offered topic-specific training programs for Drug Court teams after the completion of a thorough literature review of over 100 articles pertaining to shaping behavior. This session will offer an in-depth analysis of the ten science-based principles every Drug Court should consider before responding to client behavior. Identify practical applications of the ten science based principles in developing a comprehensive strategy on incentives and sanctions. Identify successful strategies for using incentives and sanctions in an Adult Drug Court. Learn the ten science-based principles of changing behavior. Speaker Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia THURSDAY Identify the neurochemical actions of alcohol in the brain. Identify the symptoms of the acute use of alcohol, its chronic use consequences and withdrawal symptoms. Understand evidence-based treatment implication. 67

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION B-10 The Smoking Gun: The Role of Law Enforcement and Ethical Issues in a Drug Court Setting 206 A/B Police and Probation Officers face unique challenges in Drug Court. Some of these challenges present as ethical dilemmas. Officers are often aware of treatment information which they may not be able to reveal. Sometimes officers are aware of criminal justice investigations which they cannot reveal. When are you at risk for an ethical breach? What will you do? Learn how to identify ethical problems in a Drug Court context. Identify methods of dealing with ethical issues in the Drug Court. Learn common ethical problems officers and police face in Drug Court. Speaker Vanessa Price Inspector/Law Enforcement Consultant NDEC-TAC-Midwest Region Director Oklahoma City, Oklahoma SESSION B-11 Border Towns: Special Issues to Consider for Drug Courts on the US/Mexican Border 210 D Challenges faced with supervising federal offenders on the U.S./Mexico Border. El Paso is one of the safest cities in the United States which neighbors, Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, once known as the murder capital of the world. The United States Federal Probation Office in the Western District of Texas supervises approximately 1300 federal offenders in the El Paso area and the surrounding communities. This presentation will provide insight and an overview of the Mexican American culture unique to the El Paso area. Topics of discussion: bi-national identities, hybrid Catholicism, the gang culture, economic structure, employment and more. Maggie Chaparro U.S. Probation Officer Mental Health Officer Western District of Texas, El Paso Division EL Paso, Texas Otis L. Martin Supervising U.S. Probation Officer Drug and Alcohol Unit Western District of Texas, El Paso Division El Paso, Texas Manuel Resendez, Jr. U.S. Probation Officer Mental Health/High Risk Officer Western District of Texas, El Paso Division El Paso, Texas Emilia Sanchez U.S. Probation Officer Mental Health/Sex Offender Officer Western District of Texas, El Paso Division El Paso, Texas Maricela Seward Senior U.S. Probation Officer Mental Health Specialist Western District of Texas, El Paso Division El Paso, Texas 68 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION B-12 From the Needle to the Pen: Telling it Like it is! -Addicted to Drugs or Addicted to the Lifestyle 205 A/B Substance abusing and criminal justice clients are not just addicted to drugs but are often addicted to a lifestyle that court teams continue to miss or ven begin to understand. Without discussing these dynamics, clients continue to fail, especially from a cultural perspective. The author discusses and shares through his writings, how he manipulated and conned various professionals, and how the pen became his salvation in the midst of his addiction to fight for sanity in the unforgiving insanity of the drug world. This session further identifies what Drug Court practitioners can do to address these dynamics to support success for racially and culturally diverse participants. Define the lifestyle of addiction and how it impacts success. Explain the relationships between addiction to the drug and addiction to the lifestyle and the implications for Drug Courts. Identify strategies for practitioners to use from peer coaching to recognizing unrealistic expectations. Timothy James Author and Sr. Associate James-Andrews and Associates: CHALLENGES Atlanta, Georgia Susan James-Andrews President and CEO James-Andrews and Associates Mitchellville, Maryland SESSION B-13 New Directions in PTSD Definition and Treatment 208 A/B The DSM 5 made both subtle and radical changes to the definition of PTSD. These changes suggest different phenotypes of PTSD. It will be critical to accurately identify these phenotypes, which will require different and perhaps more flexible treatment approaches. Suggestions for how to design clinical programming for each phenotype will be discussed. This presentation is for all audiences, but will be especially useful for clinicians and program administrators. Speaker Brian Meyer Clinical Psychologist H.H. McGuire VA Medical Center Richmond, Virginia SESSION B-14 What s in Your Drug Screen? 210 A/B A better understanding of what drugs are actually included in your drug screen. Discussion on methaqualone and propoxyphene, two drugs no longer manufactured in the U.S. yet still included in many routine drug screens. Discussions on what screening test for synthetic marijuana are actually detecting and what compounds are being used. Can you screen for the synthetic stimulants. What new drugs are on the market and are labs testing for these. Understanding what drugs are actually included in your drug screen. Learn what drugs are no longer produced or are a problem in the U.S. Learn what new drugs have screening available and exactly what those screens include. Difference between an immuno assay screen and an LC/MS/MS screen. New drugs not being tested. THURSDAY Speaker Pat Pizzo Director of Toxicology Alere Toxicology Hitchcock, Texas 69

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION B-15 24/7 Alcohol Monitoring of Offenders Pretrial and Postrial 209 A/B Target 25 is the early identification, placement, and pretrial supervision of second and subsequent offense DUI offenders. Target 25 uses 24/7 concepts, and is a perfect complement to DUI Treatment Courts. The program was established through a partnership between the District Attorney s Office, the Court of Common Pleas, the minor judiciary, local law enforcement, the Sheriff s Department, the Adult Probation Department, the Clerk of Courts and the local defense bar. Stakeholders developed uniform countywide written protocols for arrest, blood draw, bail, supervision, monitoring and sentencing. High risk DUI offenders are identified at arrest, brought before magisterial district judge and placed on supervised bail with alcohol monitoring within hours of arrest. The Adult Probation Department then processes these cases within 24 hours to five days and places the offender on the 24/7 continuous alcohol monitoring bracelet. As a result, these offenders are effectively managed in the community saving jail days. The probation officer supervises the case, refers individuals to and monitors treatment compliance while on bail. The program emphasizes sobriety and rewards voluntary early treatment, enabling early identification and placement in the county s DUI court program and other diversionary sentencing programs. Preliminary program outcomes are very promising. Of those individuals referred to treatment, 87% either successfully completed treatment or remained in treatment at the time of sentencing. 90% of Target 25 offenders remain arrest free while on the program and 83% of these offenders complete their bail term with no technical violations, including no violation of their alcohol monitoring. 94% of Target 25 offenders appear for their court hearings. There has been a 90% reduction in repeat DUI offenses. Finally, the number of DUI victims served decreased from approximately 20% to 5% of total victims served since implementation of Target 25, while the number of victims increased for all other crime. Developing a coordinated response to the multiple DUI offender. Partnering with Law Enforcement, Judiciary and Probation to immediately use 24/7 alcohol monitoring on repeat offenders. Methods to promote early intervention and treatment. Tim Barker Prosecuting Attorney York County DA s Office York, Pennsylvania Mark Bentzel Chief Northern York County Regional P.D. Dover, Pennsylvania Hon. John Kennedy Judge York County Treatment Courts York, Pennsylvania Michael Stough Deputy Chief of York County Adult Probation York County Probation York, Pennsylvania 70 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION B-16 Impaired Driving Risk Assessment: What Practitioners Need to Know 210 C Research about the risk assessment of impaired drivers has grown in the past decade. In conjunction with this, demand for knowledge has increased as agencies seek to better utilize limited resources to effectively manage the impaired driver population. Research shows that properly-designed strategies and tools developed to match offenders risks and needs with appropriate programs and interventions have beneficial effects, including reductions in recidivism as well as reductions in substance misuse that translate into risk reduction and greater public safety. Thus, it is timely to take stock of available research and knowledge about impaired drivers and their offending behavior in an effort to inform practices that are currently applied to characterize, assess, and manage these drivers post-conviction in a way that promotes long-term risk reduction. The purpose of this presentation is to summarize available knowledge about the profile and characteristics of impaired drivers, relevant risk factors, risk assessment instruments, and effective treatment interventions for impaired drivers as well as best practices in the field. Increased awareness and understanding of the profile and characteristics of impaired drivers and the assessment/treatment options available to criminal justice and treatment professionals can help to better identify, manage, and address this high-risk population in the future. Erin Holmes Research Associate Traffic Injury Research Foundation Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Robyn Robertson President & CEO Traffic Injury Research Foundation Ottawa, Ontario, Canada SESSION B-17 Adoption & Safe Families Act: What Does it Mean for Family Drug Courts? 207 A/B The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA)was enacted on November 19, 1997. It was signed into law to address issues that were innate in the foster care and adoption system. What AFSA really accomplished was a vital change in thinking toward the child welfare system. An emphasis was placed on establishing permanency for abused and neglected children in a timely manner. Gone are the days where children are returned to parents regardless of the best interest of the child. This session will examine the current state of child abuse and neglect cases across the country, as well as recent permanency outcomes in terms of family Drug Courts. This presentation will also look at the challenges child welfare agencies and the judicial system face by complying with AFSA, with an examination of possible solutions to those issues. THURSDAY Learn about the characteristics associated with DWI and the differences between men/women and first/ repeat offenders. Learn what is known about risk factors associated with DWI and the strengths/limitations of instruments used to assess risk. Learn what treatment interventions are available for DWI offenders and what is known about factors related to better outcomes. Provide a basic understanding of the Adoption and Safe Families Act. Identity common issues associate with ASFA. Examine current family Drug Court operations to determine compliance with ASFA. Speaker Melissa Ellet Court Probation Officer Third Judicial District Court Las Cruces, New Mexico 71

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY Learn how a Drug Court team can successfully work through the process of implementing new programs or evidence-based practices. Understand how program integration in Drug Courts can impact system-level change. Identify strategies to facilitate program implementation and integration at your Drug Court. SESSION B-18 Guiding System-Level Change: Developing a Comprehensive Plan for Integrating Innovative Programs into Drug Court 213 C/D When an opportunity arises to bring a new program or evidence-based practice to the Drug Court, is it simply added on or is it integrated and embedded into the system? Successfully integrating programs into Drug Court settings is a process that requires thoughtful examination of current operations, desired future outcomes, and strategic planning. Program implementation without integration overlooks the opportunity to embed and sustain program services and principles. As variability in program implementation is related to the outcomes achieved by these programs (Berkel, Mauricio, Schoenfelder, Sandler, 2011; Durlak & DuPre, 2008), it is beneficial to approach implementation with purposeful consideration. This session will discuss the process of how a Drug Court team can facilitate program implementation to guide system-level change, involve individuals at all levels to maximize buy-in and success, and track and evaluate progress. To illustrate this process, the presenters will provide examples from their work on the National Cross-Site Evaluation of Juvenile Drug Courts (JDC) and Reclaiming Futures (RF) and the development of a visual representation of the JDC/RF integration. We will present outcomes of the process analysis and discuss challenges, successes, and strategies for effective implementation to bring back to local Drug Courts. Additionally, the presentation will show how evaluation and tracking performance results in meaningful outcomes that can be used to reinforce and sustain program implementation, build support for the Drug Court, and guide system-level change. Alison Greene Director of Adolescent Research and Services The University of Arizona Southwest Institute for Research on Women Tucson, Arizona Raanan Kagan Senior Policy Analyst Carnevale Associates Gaithersburg, Maryland Josephine D. Korchmaros Director-Research Methods and Statistics University of Arizona Southwest Institute for Research on Women Tucson, Arizona Erika Ostlie Managing Director Carnevale Associates Gaithersburg, Maryland 72 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION B-19 Native American Treatment and Clinical Strategies for Traveling the Wellness Road 211 B Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts are in a unique position to offer culturally-based healing to Native participants. This workshop will explore the various treatment modules currently available that incorporate Native approaches and worldviews. These include White Bison, Red Road to Wellbriety, and Native American Motivational Interviewing. Additionally, less formalized approaches are being incorporated every day, from working with Tribal Elders to Equine Therapy. Explore Wellbriety as a Native perspective on treatment. Explore strategies for incorporating Native treament modules into Drug Court programming. Explore other strategies for incorporating culture, including Equine Therapy. Steven Dakai Substance Abuse Counselor Maehnowesekiyah Wellness Center Shawano, Wisconsin Donna Humetewa-Kaye Program Manager Nakwatsvewat Institute Hotevilla, Arizona SESSION B-20 The Zealous Advocate: Defining the Defense Counsel Role as it Applies to Best Practice Standards 212 A/B As defense attorneys working in a treatment court we are in the unique situation as counselors for our clients, advocates within the legal system and members of a treatment team. At times each of these rolls seems to be in direct conflict with another. However, research has shown that having the defense attorney as a regular member of the Drug Court team helps to increase success rates among the participants. In this session we will explore how to help participants understand and feel comfortable with your role as their legal counsel and as a member of the treatment team. We will identify rules of conduct as they apply to Attorney ethical obligations. Finally we will discuss how being a member of a treatment team is different from traditional legal roles and ways in which to help other members of the team understand why your role as an advocate must be maintained even within the non adversarial approach of Drug Court. Identify the unique role of the defense attorney in the treatment court setting. Understand the defense attorney s role in developing and applying evidence based standards within the treatment court process. Explore ways to help participants and team members understand the role of the defense attorney as a team member and an advocate. THURSDAY Melynda Benjamin Assistant Public Defender Kane County Public Defender s Office St. Charles, Illinois Valerie Raine Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York 73

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION B-21 Closing a Service Gap: A Juvenile Drug Court Model to Serve Low to Moderate Risk, High Needs 213 B Sacramento Juvenile Drug Court (JDC) is a court-led collaboration that recognizes substance abuse issues in youth who are assessed as low-to moderate risk to reoffend criminally, but who have high service needs. Traditionally across the country, these youth fall into a gap of service between prevention and the Juvenile Justice System and often these kids don t receive the intervention needed. JDC is an innovative, intensive program emphasizing rehabilitation and recovery from substance abuse for non-wards since 2008. This session will highlight how to work with these youth before they are launched into adulthood and before they become more entrenched in the criminal justice system and/ or their addiction. In addition, the session will also include recent findings from the program evaluation. Preliminary results uncovered the system s misconception that low risk, high need juvenile offenders may not require juvenile offender rehabilitation. Discuss population of youth who are low-tomoderate risk to reoffend criminally, but who have high service needs. Learn about how the effective strategies of JDC can be applied to a non-ward population. Share the results of an evaluation of a program modeled as a JDC but serving only non-wards. Holly Child Research Associate Children and Family Futures Lake Forest, California Wesley Colter JDC Recovery Specialist Bridges (The STARS Program) Sacramento, California Sharon Di Pirro-Beard Health Program Coordinator Department of Health and Human Services Behavioral Health-Alcohol and Drug Services Sacramento, California Yvette Woolfolk Court Analyst Sacramento Superior Court Sacramento, California SESSION B-22 Using Treatment Mapping to Maximize Community Treatment Resources and Reduce Gaps in Services for Offenders 213 A Arizona s probation departments and the regional behavioral health authorities (RBHAs) have embraced evidence based practices in determining appropriate treatment for clients with substance abuse issues involved in Drug Courts and the criminal justice system in general. However, navigating and accessing the treatment system can be a difficult and daunting task for criminal justice professionals, treatment providers and probationers alike. Therefore, the Arizona Supreme Court, Administrative Office of the Courts has engaged in an extensive treatment mapping project to explore what treatment services are available and where, levels of care available and gaps in services compared to the population being served and the identified needs throughout the state. What resulted is a roadmap for collaboration between probation departments, behavioral healthcare networks, treatment providers and various other stakeholders as well as members of the Drug Court team. Collaboration includes identifying processes for information sharing, problem identification, resource development and access to substance 74 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 abuse treatment through a statewide database for the purpose of insuring probation staff and probationers are able to timely determine and obtain necessary services. Identify three advantages to Regional Behavioral Health Administrators working collaboratively in treatment mapping. List three steps in the process to compile existing county department resources. Learn how identifying treatment gaps leads to improved treatment services. Susan Alameda Treatment Specialist Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts Phoenix, Arizona Krista Forster Programs Specialist Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts Phoenix, Arizona Mark Stodola Probation Fellow National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Phoenix, Arizona SESSION B-23 Condado de Queens, NY, Tribunal de Manjar Bajo la Influencia de Alcohol, 7 años de éxito probado 211 A Reciente investigación a demostrado que el uso de datos de la evaluación del programa a tenido un fuerte efecto positivo en reducir la reincidencia y sobre todo el costo total del program. Esta información ha sido utilizada para evaluar las normas o tàcticas usadas por el tribunal. Esta presentación resumara los resultados de un proceso y evaluación del Tribunal de Manejar Bajo la Influencia de Alcohol en el Condado de Queens desde la pesperctiva del evaluador independiente, directora del programa y trabajador social. La Fidelidad del proceso judicial a los 10 principios rectores que son utilizados en los tribunales de manejar bajo la influencia de alcohol serán discutidos como también ingreso del participante, characterísticas de procesamiento, y publicación de resultados de graduación. Métodos de funcionamiénto de las medídas de fidelidad utilizàndo los datos del sistema de informacion (Universal Treatment Application-UTA) y otras fuentes seràn discutidas como tambièn el uso de datos de evaluaciòn para mejorar la eficàcia del programa. Aprender las mejores practicas en la operacion del tribunal de manejar bajo la influencia de alcohol. Forma de hacer operativa la medicion de fidelidad a estos principios. Como utilizar los resultados de la evaluacion para mejorar el funcionamiento de programa. Shelly Cohen Senior Research Specialist Stony Brook, New York Maritza Karagiorgos Project Director Queens DWI Court Kew Gardens, New York Peter Manzo Social Worker Queens DWI Court Kew Gardens, New York THURSDAY 75

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY TRACK SESSION C Thursday, May 29 2:45 p.m. 4:00 p.m. SESSION C-1 Target Population 201 A/B When implementing and operating a successful Drug Court, one of the first and most critical questions is Who will the court serve? The research is clear. Drug Courts are best designed and most successful when serving high risk/high need populations, that is, those participants with high criminogenic risk and high prognostic need. In fact, every component of your Drug Court program, from treatment to incentives/sanctions to case management will be integrally connected with targeting the appropriate population. But how do you identify high risk/high need participants? How do you ensure your program is targeting these individuals? This presentation will outline the research on high risk/ high need, and will further discuss and explain how to ensure your program targets the correct population. Understand the research behind serving high risk/ high need populations in Drug Court. Identify strategies for incorporating risk/need assessment into your Drug Court operations. Speaker Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia The will explore the unique program designs, selected strategies, challenges and lessons learned, surrounding planning, implementation, and sustainability planning. Suggestions for further implementation and evaluation regarding services to children in family Drug Courts will also be explored. Explore the impact of providing intensive services to children and families on well-being, permanency and safety outcomes. Discuss lessons learned from the CAM grant program sites and the effectiveness of the performance measures in informing policy makers and practitioners. Learn methods to increase collaborative partnerships to improve outcomes for children and their families. Sharon Amatetti Senior Public Health Analyst SAMHSA Women s Issues Coordinator SAMHSA/CSAT Rockville, Maryland Russ Bermejo Program Associate Children and Family Futures Irvine, California Erin Hall Program Associate Children and Family Futures Irvine, California SESSION C-2 New Ways of Serving Children in Family Drug Courts Case Studies from the Children Affected by Methamphetamines Grant Program 201 C This workshop presentation will offer case study presentations of Grantees from the Children Affected by Methamphetamine (CAM) Grant program. Funded by SAMHSA in 2010 to 12 FDC Grantee sites over a 4 year period, this initiative focused on expanding and/ or enhancing services to children and their families participating in a FDC due to parental substance use. 76 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION C-3 Economic Analysis of an Integrated Juvenile Treatment Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures Model: Methods and Results from Five Sites 201 D Juvenile Drug Court (JDC) programs are an increasingly popular option for rehabilitating juvenile offenders with substance problems. SAMHSA/CSAT and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) coordinated with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to provide Juvenile Drug Court services using the Reclaiming Futures (RF) model. RF s goals are to stimulate the development of interdisciplinary professional and community teams to install evidence-based and culturally relevant screening and assessment, appropriate integrated care coordination, and developmentally appropriate treatment and recovery support systems following engagement in the justice and treatment systems. In an early investigation of the impact of RF on JDC programs, Dennis (2013) showed that, compared to other JDC programs, youth enrolled in JDC programs using RF received more services, increased days of alcohol and drug abstinence, and reduced all types of crime in the year after intake. The University of Arizona and their collaborating partners have been funded to conduct a formal, multisite evaluation of the integration of JDC and RF. As part of a broader evaluation of the effectiveness of integrating these models, the study team is conducting a cost analysis to estimate total program costs as well as the incremental costs of adding RF to a standard JDC program. This panel will describe the methods and present the results of the cost analyses completed at five unique JDC/RF sites around the U.S. The costs of JDC/RF will be compared to costs associated with changes in criminal justice outcomes to examine potential cost-savings attributable to RF. As the integration of RF with the JDC model varied significantly across sites, costs and cost-savings will be examined at the program level, and the role of site level implementation on costs and outcomes will be discussed. Challenges associated with defining opportunity costs and distinguishing program components as RF and non-rf will be reviewed. To identify the cost-savings resulting from the integration of the Reclaiming Futures model in a Juvenile Drug Court. To discuss the incremental costs of integrating the Reclaiming Futures model in a Juvenile Drug Court. To identify the impact of site level variations in implementation on costs and outcomes. Alison Greene Director of Adolescent Research and Services The University of Arizona - Southwest Institute for Research on Women Tucson, Arizona Pamela Ihnes Research Associate Chestnut Health Systems Normal, Illinois Kathryn McCollister Associate Professor Department of Public Health Sciences University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida SESSION C-4 Mental Health Courts How to Successfully Integrate Drug Court Evidence-Based Practices into Your Mental Health Court 202 A/B There are approximately 400 Adult Mental Health Courts in operation, but to date there are not any universally adopted standards of best practices -resulting in many different models being used. If Mental Health Courts are going to be successful, they need an evidence-based starting point from which to develop. Although Mental Health Courts differ significantly from Drug Courts, the overwhelming majority of Mental Health Courts have a high percentage of offenders with co-occurring substance abuse or dependence. We must utilize the evidence-based practices from Drug Court when treating addicted mentally ill offenders in order successfully to manage their addiction as well as their mental illness. For the past 25 years, Drug Courts have provided the best antidote for substance abuse, and by utilizing their best practices and lessons learned we can make Mental Health Courts equally successful. Since 2002, Orange County has operated Mental Health Courts utilizing Drug Court principles as their foundation. With less than 25% recidivism, this model is one that is working. THURSDAY 77

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY Understand how Orange County has successfully blended Drug Court principles of addiction treatment and accountability into MHC. Understand the ingredients of Drug Courts that must be implemented for successful Mental Health Courts. Lessons learned from a Mental Health Court that has been operating since 2002. Stephani Bryson Care Coordinator -Mental Health Orange County Health Care Agency Costa Mesa, California Jim Mahar Collaborative Court Coordinator Superior Court of California, County of Orange Santa Ana, California Andrea Mahar Deputy Probation Officer Orange County Probation Department Santa Ana, California Hon. Joe Perez Judge Veterans Treatment Court, Drug Court and DUI Court Santa Ana, California SESSION C-5 Drug Court? Mental Health Court? Something Else?: Getting the Right People into the Right Programs 203 A/B The research in behavioral health and criminology is clear on the importance of using assessed risks and needs to inform case plans for individuals. Many jurisdictions struggle with coordinating target populations and referral processes among different types of programming, whether it is participants bouncing between Mental Health Court and Drug Court or communities trying to decide whether to start a new program or add different dimensions to an existing one. This session will review evidence-based principles for addressing the needs of individuals with behavioral health disorders and discuss how different communities have used systematic approaches to maximize existing resources. Understand the complex behavioral health and criminogenic needs facing defendants and researchbased responses. Describe appropriate strategies for identifying and responding to these needs. Identify different approaches used by communities around the country through different types of problem-solving courts and other system-wide collaborative initiatives. Hallie Fader-Towe Courts Policy Analyst Council of State Governments Justice Center New York, New York Fred Osher Director of Health Systems and Services Policy CSG Justice Center Washington, DC 78 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION C-6 Real Men Wear Pink (for women only) 204 A Sometimes we just need to get over ourselves! This session identifies the potential challenges for women working in Drug Court and how often their interaction with participants can take on the role of mother vs. professional; instigator vs. interventionist; display issues of transference, exhibit fear of failure amongst other areas gender responsive services and approaches to often focus on the unique needs of women and girls. While this is critically important boys and men are in need of a gender responsive approach as well. This session explores the issues facing males in recovery from trauma, to societal expectations and the impact women may have had in their lives. It also examines the dynamics of women who work with men and the challenges that may occur. Women need to reexamine their approach when working with boys, men as well as with women and girls (especially those of color)! This session identifies approaches of working with males and stresses the importance of a gender responsive approach. Identify the potential challenges for women working in Drug Court. Understand the dynamics of women working with men and challenges that may occur. Speaker Susan James-Andrews President and CEO James-Andrews and Associates Mitchellville, Maryland SESSION C-7 Findings from the Evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center: Implications for Other Problem-Solving Courts 204 C This workshop is based on a just completed comprehensive, three-year evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center (Justice Center), which was founded in 2000 and is located in Brooklyn, New York. The evaluation concludes that the Justice Center reduces crime and strengthens neighborhoods in a cost-efficient manner and is able to provide insights into the mechanisms behind these effects. There will be three short presentations. One will highlight the main findings from the evaluation likely to be of greatest interest to Drug Court and other Problemsolving Court professionals. A second presentation will focus on how the Justice Center responded to offenders with substance abuse issues who present low risk and low needs and therefore may not be suitable for a Drug Court, but are able to reduce recidivism in a limited leverage court setting. Another focus will be on opportunities that are available to Problem-solving Courts for demonstrating procedural justice through the interaction between the judge and the offender, the experience of the offender and others in the courthouse, and the relationships of the court with the larger community. David Rottman of the National Center for State Courts will facilitate a discussion that engages the audience in exploring the potential implications of the Justice Center evaluation findings for their own work and on the policies and practices of their courts. Become familiar with the key findings from the comprehensive evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center. Learn new approaches to reducing recidivism for low risk/low needs offenders outside of a Drug Court. Understand techniques for enhancing perceptions that Drug Court decisions are made in a procedurally fair manner. Ric Curtis Professor and Chair John Jay College of Criminal Justice New York, New York Cynthia Lee Senior Research Associate National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia Michael Rempel Research Director Center for Court Innovation New York, New York David Rottman Research Scientist National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia THURSDAY 79

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY Eighth Annual Breakfast For New NADCP Members and First Time Conference Attendees MARQUIS NORTHWEST, MARRIOTT Friday, May 30 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Back by popular demand, all new NADCP members and first time conference attendees are invited to join the NADCP Board of Directors and the Executive Committee for a breakfast on Friday. If you are a first time attendee, but not yet a member, we encourage you to join the NADCP. SESSION C-8 Designer Drugs 204 B This workshop is designed to highlight the growing epidemic of designer drugs today. Increased reports in the media of severe side effects from individuals using these drugs have prompted many to understand how these drugs are made and what is necessary as treatment providers to intervene. This workshop will serve as an introduction to specific high profile designer drugs, their dangerous effects, and the necessary treatment considerations required to change this behavior. Distinguish designer drugs and how they are made. Learn how to treat and case manage someone who uses these unique drugs. Recognize challenges ER staff, crisis workers, law enforcement and treatment providers have when encountering users. Speaker Kristine Nutt Treatment Provider Life Center of Galax Galax, Virginia SESSION C-9 Incentives and Sanctions in Juvenile Drug Court 207 C/D Behavior change is an important aspect of JDCs, and research tells us that to promote positive behavior change within a juvenile drug court, incentives and sanctions should be given in a 4 to 1 ratio (i.e., four incentives for every one sanction). However, this is a difficult task to accomplish for Juvenile and Adult Drug Courts. Recommended practice is to try to achieve a 1 to 1 ratio. Ultimately, this means JDC team teams may need to create opportunities to deliver more incentives than sanctions to the youth in the program. In addition, it is extremely important to provide incentives that are meaningful to the youth, and as much as possible, involve the youth in choosing their own incentive and/or sanction, so they have ownership in the process. This session will cover a three-prong approach to implementing incentives and promoting behavior change in youth. : Participants will learn about privilege-reduction strategies to gain compliance over a single behavior dirty UAs AND individualize incentives for clean UAs. Delivering a response every single time! Participants will learn how to create individualized behavior contracts to reward and motivate for positive behavior change in other areas (e.g., school attendance; family connectedness; community involvement). 80 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Participants will learn about program-wide incentives to motivate families to engage in the program, upward phase movement, and promote a strengthbased atmosphere. Hon. Anthony Capizzi Judge Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio Wendy Schiller Technical Assistance Manager National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Reno, Nevada SESSION C-10 Assessing and Addressing Family Needs in Adult Drug Courts 206 A/B Adult Drug Court participants bring with them myriad family concerns as well as strengths. New research results show that assessing and addressing family needs and cultivating family strengths promotes engagement in Adult Drug Court, recovery and Drug Court outcomes. The Family Strengths and Needs Survey was developed to identify intra-familial resources, service needs and areas in which additional screening and assessment are needed. Learn about the Family Strengths and Needs Survey, its capability to be automated, data checked and integrated into databases with useful reporting and evaluation functions. Results of administration of the Family Strengths and Needs Survey in pilot projects in Montana and elsewhere will be described, and the effects of providing family focused resources to dult Drug Court participants explained. Gain greater understanding why addressing family needs is important for individual and family recovery in Adult Drug Courts. Learn about the Family Strengths and Needs Survey and its implementation in pilot projects in Montana. Explore practice and policy implications for addressing family needs, including the need for greater collaboration within the Adult Drug Court and the community. Speaker Jane Pfeifer Senior Program Associate Children and Family Futures Irvine, California SESSION C-11 Immigration Issues 210 D There is a lengthy list of crimes in Federal immigration law for which conviction can make a person deportable, inadmissible, ineligible for naturalization, or ineligible for discretionary relief from a deportation order, some of which are classified as relatively minor crimes under state law. Further, Federal immigration law defines conviction to include suspended sentences with court-ordered probation, which includes sentences to Drug Court. In addition, there are grounds for removal not requiring a criminal conviction that may affect Drug Court participants. This session will provide an overview of the immigration risks to defendants arising from participation in Drug Court and discuss steps that Drug Courts may take to help immigrant participants reduce those risks. Identify the types of crimes involved in Drug Court cases that might carry immigration consequences. Explain what a conviction is under Federal immigration law. Explain how a sentence to Drug Court can fall within that definition and constitute a conviction of the underlying crime for Federal immigration purposes. Speaker Hon. Rogelio R. Flores Superior Court Judge Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara Santa Maria, California THURSDAY 81

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION C-12 Black Trauma 205 A/B This session will highlight the significance of trauma in the African American community, the importance of understanding resilience and healing and how that has the potential to impact the Drug Court experience. This session will include principles for culturally proficient trauma informed approaches and specific engagement strategies including empowerment and community integration. Learn culturally proficient strategies to work more effectively with African American trauma impacted populations to include historical trauma. Gain knowledge on the importance of healing and resiliency with African American Drug Court participants. Discuss how empowerment, advocacy and community engagement can be used therapeutically to build protective factors for healing. Speaker Darryl Turpin President Darryl Turpin Consulting Louisville, Kentucky SESSION C-13 Secondary Trauma Is Not Secondary in Importance: Supporting Staff Doing Trauma Informed Treatment 208 A/B Clients in substance abuse treatment often report histories of trauma, reflecting, in part, the use of substances to self-medicate. The co occurrence of substance abuse and trauma-related symptoms is evident among many Drug Court participants. In order to be effective with these clients, there is a need to provide intercession for trauma-related symptoms within their substance abuse treatment programs; thus, programs have begun to integrate treatment for trauma with that of substance abuse. Trauma-informed interventions reflect staff knowledge of the impact of trauma on the individual and their substance use. To provide trauma-informed substance abuse treatment staff members are trained to understand the impact of trauma on their clients behaviors. While valuable for clients, trauma-informed interventions also increase staff exposure to client trauma. This exposure can have untoward impact on staff, activating psychological distress and resulting in vicarious trauma particularly if the staff member has had his or her own traumatic experiences. On the other hand, doing trauma-informed treatment can also result in vicarious post-traumatic growth, providing staff with a stronger sense of self. In this presentation, we will review research on vicarious trauma and vicarious posttraumatic growth and their relationship to each other. Next, the presentation will describe a survey of 50 substance abuse treatment providers on the personal impact of trauma-informed treatment. Staff experiences of vicarious trauma and vicarious post-traumatic growth subsequent to working with clients, and the factors associated with these outcomes, personal history of trauma and substance abuse treatment, will be discussed. Finally, a clinical supervisor will describe methods for helping staff members process the issues that arise in doing trauma-informed treatment using reflective supervision. To learn what is meant by secondary trauma and vicarious trauma, and factors which are associated with these problems. To learn about staff perceptions of the positive and negative impact of doing trauma-informed interventions. To learn how to provide reflective supervision to staff engaged in trauma-informed treatment in a Drug Court. Merith Cosden Professor University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California Dorothy Groce Program Manager, Therapist Good Samaritan Services Santa Maria, California Lauren Koch Researcher University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California 82 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION C-14 Alcohol Monitoring and Testing Technologies: A Primer for New Programs, a Refresher on Policies 210 A/B A survey of 1.2 million prisoners in state correctional facilities found that one-third had been using alcohol at the time of their offense. For the more than 207,000 violent crimes included in the survey, the percentage rose to 37%. Ensuring offenders stay sober while released to community supervision has many positive effects. Criminal justice officials can effectively use different technology tools to track alcohol consumption by parolees, probationers and pretrial defendants who are living in the community. This workshop is for agencies considering an alcohol monitoring program. Learn the basics of alcohol testing methods and devices, including continuous alcohol monitoring, the benefits of adding a program, key considerations, and how to begin with a focus on policy development. Geared to professionals and administrators who are new to alcohol testing and electronic monitoring and/or considering implementing such a program within their agency. Offers program administrators a refresher on policy and program development. Speaker Robert Murnock Eastern Regional Manager Specializing in Offender Monitoring BI Incorporated Boulder, Colorado SESSION C-15 Advances and New Skills in Case Interpretation and Sentencing Design for Problem-Solving Courts: Decision Support Technologies for Judges and Other Stakeholders 209 A/B Three main challenges underlie correctional decisionmaking and sentencing: Producing valid case assessments that often require actuarial risk and need assessments within PSI reports. Case interpretation where court decision makers must synthesize and organize large amounts of information to more validly make sense of cases prior to sentencing. Treatment planning and sentencing design to more appropriately match offenders to sanctioning and rehabilitation or crime reduction components. We will review the background of these three challenges and illustrate recent developments and automation advances that provide upgraded support for all three phases. Research based automated systems can be fully integrated into court case management and decision support procedures. We will review key scientific requirements of reliability and validation, and illustrate and discuss several real cases using these techniques. These offer substantial decision-support for court stakeholders (Judges, Defense Attorneys, Prosecutors and PSI report writers) to help guide problem-solving sentencing and lead to more insightful case interpretations as well as more appropriate sentencing designs. Tim Brennan Chief Scientist Northpointe Institute Golden, Colorado Angel Ilarraza Implementation Consultant and Trainer Northpointe Institute Golden, Colorado THURSDAY 83

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION C-16 Strategies for Getting Law Enforcement on Board 210 C Research shows that having law enforcement on the DWI Court team results in better outcomes. It can be challenging to get the support of law enforcement and to have an officer assigned to be a part of the DWI Court team. This session will be an interactive session designed to engage the audience in a discussion of the issues, challenges, and ideas for making the most out of our necessary and vital relationship with law enforcement. Mack Jenkins Chief Probation Officer San Diego, California Russell B. Laine Chief of Police Village of Algonquin Algonquin, Illinois Vanessa Price Inspector/Law Enforcement Consultant NDEC-TAC-Midwest Region Director Oklahoma City, Oklahoma During this discussion you will learn how this Queens County, New York, unit is the forerunner in this team approach, working successfully with defense attorneys, treatment providers, court staff and others in creating a unique model. Learn how to provide the tools to create an Alternative Sentencing unit. Understand how to apply the 10 key components within a district attorney office. Learn how having strong support from your local district attorney can have a positive impact in the community. SESSION C-17 Queens District Attorney s Office Embrace the 10 Key Components 207 A/B The Queens County District Attorney recognizes that diversion of criminal defendants to alternative treatment is a truly innovative approach. This office pioneers mandatory treatment for drug abuse and other behavioral issues, of which early identification of cases is critical in implementing this model. The Queens District Attorney has embraced the Drug Court treatment model within his office and in doing so follows the 10 Key Components. As a result, he has created a unique unit within the Office called Alternative Sentencing. This initiative is distinctive in that it is headed by a dedicated director and staff, and is the only District Attorney s Office in New York City that has adopted this approach. Maritza Karagiorgos Project Director Queens DWI Court Kew Gardens, New York Douglas L. Knight Director of Alternative Sentencing Queens District Attorney s Office Kew Gardens, New York Peter Manzo Social Worker Queens DWI Court Kew Gardens, New York Donna Myrill Assistant District Attorney Queens District Attorney s Office Kew Gardens, New York 84 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION C-18 Peer Recovery Support: Recovery Coaching A New Approach to Reducing Recidivism in Problem Solving Courts 213 C/D Entering into Drug Treatment Court can be an overwhelming experience for participants trying to regain a productive lifestyle. Treatment methods are developed and expectations of the participant must be met. Through Peer Recovery Support and Recovery Coaching, participants are guided through the process from someone who has been through the criminal justice system, treatment and has utilized community resources. As Peers are teamed with participants they walk them through different scenarios that may arise during their time in Drug Treatment Court. They are taught how to build a foundation of recovery and utilize skills they are developing while in Drug Treatment Court. This team building approach develops a line of communication and understanding that helps the participant engage at a higher level in becoming a productive member of society, thus reducing recidivism within the criminal justice system. Understand the role of a Peer Recovery Support Specialist within Drug Treatment Court. Learn specific techniques that Peer Recovery Support Specialists use to engage Drug Treatment Court participants. Team building strategies which contributes to community engagement and reducing recidivism. Greg Hendricks Peer Recovery Support Specialist Carroll County Drug Treatment Court Graduate Westminster, Maryland Brandee Izquierdo Peer Recovery Support Specialist Carroll County Health Department Westminster, Maryland SESSION C-19 Separate Tracks in Healing to Wellness Court 211 B Healing to Wellness Courts can take a variety of forms, representing the particular needs of their tribal community. Because tribal communities tend to have younger populations, with an ever-changing array of drugs of choice, a tribe s target population may be broader than typically recommended. Simultaneously, a tribal justice system may not be able to support multiple Problem-solving Courts. It may therefore be important for Tribal Healing to Wellness Court to operate separate tracks within one Wellness Court for their diverse participants. This workshop will explore the benefits of having separate tracks; typical populations that benefit from separate tracks, such as juveniles, veterans, particular substance abuse users, and high-risk/high-need participants; and strategies for doing so effectively and cost-efficiently. Learn the benefits of having separate tracks. Learn about the particular populations that benefit from separate tracks. Learn strategies for how to operate separate tracks effectively and cost-efficiently. Hon. Joseph Flies-Away Tribal Judge and Consultant Tribal Law and Policy Institute Phoenix, Arizona Hon. Charlene Jackson Manager / Associate Judge Jackson Law Firm Queen Creek, Arizona Lauren Van Schilfgaarde Tribal Law Specialist Tribal Law and Policy Institute West Hollywood, California THURSDAY 85

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION C-20 Guess What? You re a Family Court, Too (if your Clients have Children) Legal Issues and Practical Considerations When Working with Families in Drug Courts 212 A/B All collaborative courts are family courts if their clients include parents and children. Many of clients may have legal matters involving juvenile delinquency, dependency, family, and domestic violence matters. This workshop will offer judicial leaders and legal professionals working in Adult Drug Courts an overview of the dependency court and child welfare system and offer some practical strategies on how to work with parents who are involved in family courts. Participants will gain a greater understanding and awareness of how decisions in Adult Drug Court impact the child and family, even if the child is never seen in court. This presentation will make the case why Adult Drug Courts should pay greater attention to children and families and why cross-system collaboration and communication are community partnerships are critical for family safety and recovery. National resources for legal education and training will also be provided. Gain greater understanding of dependency and child welfare system and learn practical strategies on how to work with participating parents. Gain a greater understanding of the impact of substance use on children, and the importance of addressing the needs of children and the parent-child relationship as a critical part of family recovery. Learn how cross-systems collaboration, communication, and community partnerships are critical in serving the complex needs of children and families in your Drug Court. Phil Breitenbucher FDC Program Director Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California Hon. Phillip Britt Commissioner 35th Judicial Circuit Family Treatment Court Kennett, Missouri Hon. Jeri Beth Cohen Judge Miami Dependency Drug Court Miami, Florida SESSION C-21 The RNR Program Tool for Adults: Achieving Better Outcomes Through Quality Programming 213 B An important part of achieving better outcomes from Drug Treatment Courts is to ensure that the treatment and court processes use evidence-based practices. To assist jurisdictions in assessing these issues, The RNR Program Tool for Adults, part of the RNR Simulation Tool was developed by researchers at the Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!) at George Mason University. NADCP s new core concepts, with the supporting research, are part of the tool and assessment. This panel presents three papers related to the utility of the RNR Program Tool for adults specifically for Drug Court professionals. The first paper in this panel discusses the theoretical foundations of the RNR Program Tool for Adults, including how the NADCP concepts are captured in the tool. The second paper discusses the ability of the RNR Program Tool for Adults to estimate gaps in programming for historically disadvantaged groups and provide recommendation for increasing access to and retention in Specialty Courts for such populations. Finally, the third paper discusses common challenges when measuring program adherence to best practices and proposes a mixed-methods approach to fidelity monitoring. The panel will consist 86 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 of research papers and then a response by Drug Court professionals on their use of the tool, and how it has assisted them in advancing evidence-based practices. Similarities between the RNR Program Tool for Adults and NADCP s new core concepts. Estimating service/programming gaps for historicallydisadvantaged groups. Mixed-method techniques to measure program adherence and improvement. Stephanie Maass Research Associate Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!) George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Amy Murphy Research Associate Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!) George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Rodolfo Perez Deputy Director Hidalgo County Community Supervision and Corrections Department Edinburg, Texas Faye Taxman University Professor Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!) George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia SESSION C-22 From Good to Great: Using Process and Outcome Data to Support Best Practice and Improve Outcomes 213 A In 2001, Maine s legislature passed a statute to create a statewide system of Drug Courts. Maine s six Adult Drug Treatment Courts (ADTC)s bring together multi-disciplinary teams to create a network of community-based, best practice, Drug Treatment Court services. In three evaluations since 2001, Maine s ADTCs have consistently performed at or better than national figures in most areas. The 2010 evaluation (the most recent year) showed that participation in Maine s Drug Courts resulted in a statewide recidivism rate of 18 percent. However, evaluations also reveal specific and reoccurring areas for improvement such as time from referral to admission, a reduction in the use of jail in response to negative behaviors, and a better understanding of how the data can be used on the local court level. In 2011 Maine s ADTCs and Maine s Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services (SAMHS) received a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance to expand the capacity and access to evidenced based treatment for Maine s six Drug Courts. The Maine Drug Court administrative group has identified and applied the NIATx Process Improvement Model to coach and support individual Drug Court Teams in improving timely access to services and implementing evidencebased practices. The NIATx model is a best practice for approach to continuous quality improvement, and has been proven effective in supporting the implementation of evidence-based treatment. This session will present a case study of the Maine Drug Treatment Courts past and present use of process and outcome data and the statewide case management data system (called DTxC) to apply continuous quality improvement to site-specific challenge areas to improve outcomes. Attendees will learn about the small changes made in Maine s ADTCs, the results this had on the areas in need of improvement, and how rapid-cycle process improvement can lead to better practices. Describe the NIATx Process Improvement Model. Identify how process/quality improvement can be used to support best practices. Discuss how process data can be used to meet Drug Court standards and improve outcomes. Jennifer Battis Research Associate, Program Evaluator Hornby Zeller Associates, Inc. South Portland, Maine Linda Frazier NIATx Coach/Senior Partner Public Health Connections Vassalboro, Maine THURSDAY 87

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION C-23 Supervisión Comunitaria 211 A Supervisión Comunitaria es un componente crítico de cualquier Juzgado de Tratamiento. En esta sesión se resumen las características de un programa de supervisión exitoso en la comunidad. Explorar la interacción y utilización de la aplicación de la ley en la supervisión comunitaria en un Juzgado de Tratamiento. Comprender el papel de la ley y lo importante que es para servir. Explorar información sobre las visitas a domicilio, las garantías, y las pruebas de drogas anti-doping durante la supervisión. Speaker Alfredo Villalba Alcohol and Drug Program Specialist County of San Diego -Health and Human Services San Diego, California TRACK SESSION D Thursday, May 29 4:15 p.m. 5:30 p.m. SESSION D-1 The Brain on Drugs 201A/B Alcohol and other drugs modify the body s entire neurochemistry once they enter the body s system. Alcohol and other drugs trigger a massive release of neurotransmitters within the brain s pleasure centers, inhibiting its ability to replenish its chemical reservoirs. This session will provide practitioners with insight into why an individual continually uses drugs to replenish chemical reservoirs to feel good again. Understand the effect of drug use on mind and body. Identify the impact on the brain of initial and prolonged drug use. Learn to distinguish behaviors associated with use and withdrawal of various drugs. Speaker Steve Hanson Director Division of Treatment and Practice Innovation Bureau of Addiction Treatment Centers Rochester, New York 88 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION D-2 So How Do You Know They are Ready? Key Considerations for Assessing Families in Recovery for Reunification 201 C The accountable, time-limited mandate for achieving permanency for children set forth in the 1997 Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) drove the demand for a better and coordinated system response to meet the needs of families affected by parental substance use. FDCs have emerged as a model of meaningful collaboration to improve safety, recovery, and permanency outcomes. This workshop presentation will explore the impact parental substance abuse on the parent-child relationship and the essential service components needed to address these issues, including ensuring quality visitation and contact, implementation of evidence-based services, including parent education and therapeutic services, and access to ongoing family recovery support. This workshop discussion will explore family readiness as a collaborative practice issue by raising the need for coordinated case plans and effective communication protocols across CWS, treatment, and Court systems. In addition to common essentials, the discussion will explore different program designs across sites, including the timing and phasing of reunification, family maintenance supervision, and case termination. Understand the impact parental substance abuse on the parent-child relationship and the essential service components needed to address these issues. Understand family readiness as a collaborative practice issue and why team is just as an important as any tool for assessing readiness. Learn various case management strategies, including implementation of quality visitation and contact, evidence-based services, coordinated case plans and effective communication protocols across CWS, treatment, and Court systems. Alexis Balkey Program Associate Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California Phil Breitenbucher FDC Program Director Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California SESSION D-3 Preparing for Team Transition in a Juvenile Drug Court: Why is it so Important? 201 D Juvenile Drug Court (JDC) professionals are innovated, dedicated professionals who often get promoted, are appointed to work in other areas of the court, or find new career paths. For this reason there is a substantial amount of turnover among JDC team members because this issue permeates most jurisdictions that have a JDC program, it is important to implement a process to transition new team members onto the existing Drug Court team (excerpt taken from 7 (Easy) Steps to Creating a Transition Policy for Juvenile Drug Court Team Members, published in Juvenile and Family Justice TODAY, Winter 2013). This presentation, based on the above mentioned article, focuses on practical solutions to creating and codifying a transition policy for JDC team members. The presentation will be interactive in nature, with many real-world examples and resources. Participants will learn ways to draft and codify a practical transition policy for their Juvenile Drug Court team. Participants will learn how to create buy-in for new team members by incorporating learning packets and other team building activities. Participants will learn how to transition new team members onto the team, as well as, familiarize youth and caregivers. Jessica Pearce Training Manager National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Reno, Nevada Wendy Schiller Technical Assistance Manager National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Reno, Nevada THURSDAY 89

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION D-4 Risk and Needs in Mental Health Courts 202 A/B This session will build on the skills-building session, Incorporating Criminogenic Risks/Needs, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Needs to Reduce Recidivism and Promote Recovery to address specific programming issues in implementing screening/assessment for risks and needs, building case plans off of assessed risks/ needs, and facilitating participant success. It will also address tough questions like convincing stakeholders of the importance of defining program target population based on research and local resources. The session will begin with a brief recap of the principles for evidence-based policy and practice in Adults with Behavioral Health Needs Under Correctional Supervision: A Shared Framework for Reducing Recidivism and Promoting Recovery (<http:// consensusproject.org/jc_publications/adults-withbehavioral-health-needs> ), developed by the CSG Justice Center with support from NIC, BJA, and SAMHSA. Understand the risk-need-responsivity principles and criminogenic risk. Describe considerations for programs in working with high risk population (e.g., responding to high profile events). Consider how screening and assessment processes for mental health, substance abuse, and criminogenic risk could be implemented in their programs. Hallie Fader-Towe Courts Policy Analyst Council of State Governments Justice Center New York, New York Eric Olson Mental Health Coordinator Bonneville County Mental Health Court Idaho Falls, Idaho SESSION D-5 New Developments in Supported Employment 203 A/B In 2008, San Francisco s award winning Behavioral Health Court added Supported Employment to its list of evidence-based practices. This program provides support to clients with major mental illness by helping them to find and maintain employment and eliminate barriers that forensic mental health consumers face. The goal is to provide competitive work in integrated work settings that match the capabilities and interests of clients for whom competitive employment has not traditionally occurred. This workshop will present cutting edge ideas including a nuts and bolts presentation and discussion about how to start a similar program in your community. Learn how a supported employment program improves recidivism rates in your Mental Health Court. Understand how to start a supported employment program in your community. Learn about current research in supported employment practices. Kathleen Connolly-Lacey LCSW Program Director UCSF/Citywide Case Management Forensics San Francisco, California Gregory Jarasitis Director of Supported Employment UCSF/Citywide Case Management Forensics San Francisco, California Lisa Lightman Director San Francisco Superior Court San Francisco, California 90 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 THURSDAY SESSION D-6 From Silence to Trust -Serving Asian-American Families in Drug Courts 204 A Historically, traditional Asian cultures have viewed issues of substance abuse and other addiction disorders (ie. gambling), domestic violence, and mental illness as stigmas and the source of shame for the individual and the family. There is a strong and broad-based preference for silence on these subjects and individuals who talk about family problems with outsiders often suffer emotional and even physical restraints from a large family circle. As a result, studies have shown that there is under-reporting of family and social challenges such as addiction, domestic violence, mental illness in the Asian American community. How do clinicians penetrate that barrier to form an open and trusting relationship with the individual? How do professionals help when culture and family expectations pull the individual back into denial? How do practitioners awaken the individual without up-ending an entire culture or alienating the individual from his or her family or cultural identity? This workshop will provide Drug Court professionals the tools and guidance to better serve families from Asian Pacific Islander cultures. Explore the cultural meanings and contexts of drug use and other co-occurring conditions (ie. gambling, domestic violence, mental illness) amongst APIs and how such understanding is crucial in treatment and service engagement. Understand the importance of acculturation (process of cultural change) when engaging with individuals from any ethnic or cultural groups. Learn common mistakes (ie. do no harm) and practical strategies when working towards gaining trust with API clients. Russ Bermejo Program Associate Children and Family Futures Irvine, California Jorge Wong Director of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Asian Americans for Community Involvement San Francisco, California Hon. Erica Yew Judge Santa Clara County Superior Court San Jose, California 91

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION D-7 Drug Court Peer Review: Creating a Learning Community -How Do You Do It? How Does It Work? Peer Experiences in Four States: Oregon, Colorado, Idaho and Georgia 204 C The peer review process is intended to create a statewide learning community among treatment court teams. The purpose is for peers to help each other identify ideas for program improvements and share successes and challenges. This allows treatment court community across the state access to information and support at a low administrative cost while building relationships between programs. It can also provide important information to the state about areas of needed technical assistance and training, and how to focus those resources most effectively. This panel will provide a description of the peer review process and then state coordinators and peers from four states: Oregon, Colorado, Idaho and Georgia will share experiences in implementing the process uniquely within their states, including recruiting peer teams and performing reviews as well as what was gained from the process. What is peer review, how do you do it and how can you use it? How do you recruit and train peers to engage in the process? What are successes and challenges in the peer review process? Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon Paul Egbert Grants Program Manager Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Portland, Oregon Norma D. Jaeger Statewide Drug Court and Mental Health Court Coordinator Idaho Supreme Court Boise, Idaho Juliette Mackin Vice President / Senior Research Associate Northwest Professional Consortium, Inc. (NPC Research) Portland, Oregon Brenidy Rice State Drug Court Coordinator/ Court Program Analyst Colorado Judicial Department Denver, Colorado Lateefah Thomas Program Manager Office of Accountability Courts & Grants Management at the Georgia Administrative of the Courts Atlanta, Georgia 92 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION D-8 Working with Methamphetamine Addicted Offenders 204 B The Butte County Drug Court has worked with an 85% average methamphetamine based population since its inception in 1995. Learn how to engage and hold these folks as they take the journey to recovery. Each part of the team can assist with the ultimate goal of keeping them engaged in treatment until they become invested and engaged in recovery. Learn the psychopharmacology of methamphetamine and how it impacts your engagement strategies. Learn how to keep methamphetamine offenders working in spite of the anhedoina they experience. Practice how to engage offenders throughout their journey in Drug Court. SESSION D-9 Incentives and Sanctions in Family Dependency Treatment Court: Special Issues to Consider 207 C/D In order for substance abusing parents to change behaviors which put their children at risk, they must enter and complete treatment and complete their child protection case plans. Learn what science tells us about using incentives and sanctions to keep parents engaged in case plans. Find out what research says works, what doesn t work, and how to effectively respond to participants so good choices are reinforced and negative choices minimized. Identify science based principles of changing behavior. Apply the principles to substance abusing parents in family Drug Court. Penny Clodfelter Program Manager Family Drug Court Kansas City, Missouri Hon. Molly Merrigan Commissioner 16th Judicial Circuit of Missouri Kansas City, Missouri THURSDAY Amy Asher Probation Officer Butte County Probation Oroville, California Willie Cosgrave Treatment Provider Butte County Behavioral Health Chico, California Helen Harberts Deputy District Attorney (ret.) Chico, California Steven Trenholme Attorney at Law Butte County, California 93

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION D-10 Traditional and Non-Traditional Benefits from Probation and Law Enforcement Officers 206 A/B The Jefferson County Adult Drug Court utilizes probation and law enforcement officers in traditional and creative ways to ensure the long-term success of the graduates. Officers are essential in the traditional sense in that they are often familiar with the individual s family and social contacts and provide information about which a participant may not be forthcoming or even aware of. In addition, the officers serve as an extra set of eyes and ears by conducting home visits and providing tracking services. In addition, the officers have access to computer databases and can access information about the participant s contacts, a participant s gun license and/or hunting permit, as well as the status of driver s licenses and warrants. As the court works with community members for transportation assistance, access to driver s license records is vital. Law enforcement and probation also provide creative approaches to treatment and sanctions. The solutions include daily reporting to monitor job search, jail with release for day treatment where no in-patient option exists, community service in the courthouse, access to counselors in jail, and hold-over time in lieu of actual jail time. The officers assist in developing positive team dynamics. The officers provide training to team members on PBTs and breathalyzers. The officers also provide tours of the jail for team members and attend team building sessions. The goal for graduates is not only their long-term sobriety, but to become a productive, law-abiding member of society. By providing multiple positive interactions with law enforcement, the participants come to respect the law. In addition, law enforcement removes certain Drug Court related arrests from an individual s arrest record, which helps with employment. Participants look forward to law enforcement s graduation presentation, which includes a copy of their booking photo, a thenand now representation of their journey to sobriety. Learn to utilize traditional powers of law enforcement and probation officers to obtain additional information about clients. Learn to use law enforcement and probation officer s authority to explore creative sanctions and treatment enhancements. Learn to utilize law enforcement and probation officer s unique powers to obtain additional benefits for your clients. Ellen Dunman Case Manager Office of Probation & Parole Hillsboro, Missouri Steve Meinberg Lt. Col. Jefferson County Sheriff s Department Hillsboro, Missouri SESSION D-11 Giving Latino Participants a Voice in Drug Court: Eliminating Racial Disparities in Outcomes 210 D In 2010, the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP) released a statement title The Equivalent Treatment of Racial and Ethnic Minority Participants in Drug Courts. This study, which was guided by the aforementioned statement, contributes to the Drug Court literate by using qualitative research methods to explore the factors that may contribute to racial disparities in outcomes. African American and Hispanic participants (n = 33) from two Drug Courts, one located in Texas and the other in Indiana, participated in individual interviews. Interview questions centered around the factors that may contribute to racial disparities in Drug Court outcomes, and participants views on the program s effectiveness at achieving the ten key components of a Drug Court. Based on the qualitative findings, factors that may contribute to racial disparities in Drug Court outcomes include: 1) Minority participants beliefs that Drug Court sanctions were not implemented in a culturally sensitive manner; 2) Minority participants dissatisfaction with being mandated to attend Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings, and belief that the format of AA and NA is not consistent with their culture; 3) Minority participants perceptions that they were not offered enough resources to gain and maintain 94 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 employment; 4) Minority participants views that the substance abuse counseling they were receiving was not individualized, and often stigmatizing; and 5) Minority participants beliefs that they can relate better to individuals from their same ethnicity; however, they did not have ample opportunities to develop these relationships because minorities were underrepresented in the Drug Court. Recommendations for Drug Court practice are discussed, focusing specifically on evidence-based, culturally competent interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing racial disparities in outcomes. Synthesize the history of racial inequality in criminal justice and the role of Drug Court in reducing disparities in outcomes. Assess the factors that may contribute to racial disparities in Drug Court outcomes. Comprehend the effectiveness of evidence-based, culturally competent interventions for Drug Court participants. Speaker John Gallagher Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Social Work South Bend, Indiana SESSION D-12 From Boyz to Men 205 A/B Gangsta rap exploded onto the national scene in 1988 at the height of the crack epidemic. With it became a tidal wave of hip hop values which glorified the hustler lifestyle, normalized the use of marijuana, while promoting materialism and a pimp mentality that degrades women; that was 26 years ago. The young African American males that we are dealing with today are the second generation. These young black men are caught between twisted images of manhood made popular by the hip hop culture and an outright rejection of education and political involvement; values fought long and hard for during the Civil Rights Era. The result of this self-imposed street mentality has lead to higher rates of drug and alcohol problems, as well as higher incarceration rates. The leaders of the rap industry have proven that it is easier to take advantage of young African American males than it is to educate them. As a result, gangsta rappers have amassed personal fortunes flaunting these values in music and videos at the expense of the black community as a whole. This session will focus on the special challenges of this population; boyz that want to be treated like men but refused to grow up. The participants will learn cognitive behavioral evidence based techniques that I have developed in my 20 plus years of working with this population in the field of treatment and corrections. After completing this session, the participants will be better equipped to help young African American males accept responsibility, man up and maintain a drug free lifestyle THURSDAY Learn three methods of getting the clients to use their street skills to work their program of recovery. Learn three effective ways to get the client to embrace the positive aspects of the Hip Hop Culture. Know the fifteen aspects of manhood that are essential for young African American males to develop for a sober lifestyle. Describe the Seven Principles of a strong African America culture. Speaker Wallace Green Probation Officer / Treatment Coordinator Greater Cleveland Drug Court Cleveland, Ohio 95

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY of THC on driving? How is it detected? Is a medical marijuana card an affirmative defense? What are the other legal issues? What type of drug detection technology is on the horizon? What are the other legal issues? To recite the effects of marijuana on driving. To list legal issues regarding marijuana and driving. To explore the current and emerging science and technology to detect marijuana. SESSION D-13 Complex Trauma 208 A/B Complex Trauma is far more than simple trauma. It can be a result of repetitive or severe trauma such as child abuse, domestic violence, torture, and being held hostage. This presentation will discuss what Complex Trauma is, the features that differentiate it from PTSD, and its effects on survivors. It will also address how to recognize and treat Complex Trauma, and the implications for Drug Courts. This presentation is for all audiences. Speaker Brian Meyer Clinical Psychologist H.H. McGuire VA Medical Center Richmond, Virginia SESSION D-16 Marijuana and Driving Impairment 210 C More than half of Americans now support the legalization of marijuana. Two states, CO and WA, recently did so for recreational use and 18 other states have allowed it as medicine. As use of marijuana continues to grow, so does concern about drugged driving. What exactly are the effects of THC on driving? How is it detected? Is a medical marijuana card an affirmative defense? As the use of marijuana continues to grow, so does concern about drugged driving. What exactly are the effects Hon. Mary Celeste Judge NHTSA Region 8 Judicial Outreach Liaison Denver County Court Denver, Colorado Hon. Peggy Hora Judge (ret.) National Drug Court Institute Walnut Creek, California SESSION D-17 Leveraging National Health Reform to Reduce Recidivism & Build Recovery 207 A/B Recent changes to the health care and health insurance systems create an unprecedented opportunity to improve timely access to needed services, reduce recidivism, and improve public safety and health by ensuring that clients are enrolled into affordable coverage options. The greater access to care and coverage for behavioral health needs and other medical care presents justice systems with a unique and exciting challenge. Using lessons learned in Cook County (Chicago), IL, we will explore implementation of enrollment and linkage to care within justice settings in an effort to make services universally available for people under court supervision. Identify the types of crimes involved in Drug Court cases that might carry immigration consequences. Explain what a conviction is under Federal immigration law. Explain how a sentence to Drug Court can fall within that definition and constitute a conviction of the underlying crime for Federal immigration purposes. 96 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Speaker Maureen McDonnell Director for Business and Health Care Strategy Development TASC, Inc. (Treatment Alternatives for Safe Communities) Chicago, Illinois SESSION D-18 Building Effective Interventions for Young Adults in Adult Drug Courts 213 C/D A monograph entitled Young Participants in Adult Drug Courts: Practitioner Perspectives in Addressing Key Challenges was drafted by the Center for Court Innovation which defines the term young adults and expands on why young adults merit special focus. The document describes treatment interventions and service strategies of three Adult Drug Treatment Courts: Brooklyn New York Treatment Court, Denver Colorado Treatment Assessment Screening Center and Treatment Court Programs, and King County Drug Diversion Court in Seattle, Washington. The monograph presents lessons learned by practitioners who have worked with young adults and concludes that Drug Courts can positively affect disproportionate minority impact by working to prevent recidivism in the young adult population, but only by identifying those clients at high risk for recidivism. These will describe the development of specialized age, gender, cultural and developmentally appropriate interventions designed to more effectively serve young adult offenders. By promoting promising practice development for young adults, these courts and providers hope to motivate other Adult Drug Courts to modify legal and clinical exclusionary criteria to decrease disproportionate minority representation in corrections settings. David Doucett Detective Seattle Police Department, Narcotics Section Seattle, Washington Tom Essex Treatment Manager King County Drug Court Seattle, Washington Lilas Rajaee-Moore Director of TASC and Treatment Courts Denver Juvenile and Family Justice TASC Project Denver, Colorado Dennis Reilly Deputy Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York THURSDAY Gain knowledge about potential approaches to programming for young adults that improve the implementation of local Drug Courts. Learn about the development and critical elements behind the creation of young adult best practices. Provide an opportunity to discuss the problem of young adults and gain input on how to disseminate best practices. 97

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION D-19 Indian Country Legal Implications 211 B Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts function under a different legal framework than their State Drug Court counterparts. This workshop will explore that legal framework, including the Indian Civil Rights Act, the newly enacted Tribal Law and Order Act and the Violence Against Women Act, as well as potentially applicable tribal law. In addition, this workshop will explore state Drug Court case law, which while not authoritative, nevertheless might offer insights into legal issues facing Healing to Wellness Courts. Learn the applicable federal Indian law, including the Indian Civil Rights Act, TLOA, and VAWA. Learn the applicable federal Drug Court law. Explore state Drug Court case law for strategies in tribal court. Hon. Charlene Jackson Manager / Associate Judge Jackson Law Firm Queen Creek, Arizona Lauren Van Schilfgaarde Tribal Law Specialist Tribal Law and Policy Institute West Hollywood, California Hon. Korey Wahwassuck Associate Judge and Consultant Leech Lake Tribal Court & Tribal Law and Policy Institute Cass Lake, Minnesota principles derived from best practices will be woven into the discussion about the interplay of advocacy and prosecution in selecting participants, encouraging compliance, and requesting termination when necessary. This requires that both parties wear various hats and know the appropriate times to wear them. Learn about setting aside traditional roles while still being an advocate for the client and a protector of public safety. Learn about how to refer appropriate defendants for alternative court programs and encourage compliance during the program. Learn about the various hats worn by both parties and the appropriateness of these in various courts and at various times. Tammy Westcott Prosecuting Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County District Attorney s Office Tulsa, Oklahoma Jack Zanerhaft Chief Public Defender Tulsa Veterans Treatment Court Tulsa, Oklahoma SESSION D-20 Collaborative Justice: The PD and the Prosecutor, An Unlikely Couple 212 A/B The prosecutor and chief public defender from Tulsa County join together to discuss the challenges and the rewards of collaborating to see justice served through alternative court programs. This atypical scenario requires the PD and the prosecutor to shed traditional roles and learn new ones while respecting each other s alternative role. Research findings and 98 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 THURSDAY SESSION D-21 An Accelerated Track for Low Risk/Low Need Offenders 213 B Drug Courts continue to evolve by developing specialized tracks for offenders with different levels of criminogenic risk and clinical need. The field has primarily focused on how to effectively supervise and treat high risk/high need individuals. Although less attention has been given to offenders with low risk/ low need profiles, they present unique challenges that must be addressed. First, the amount of time that low risk offenders interact with high risk offenders should be limited. Such interactions may expose low risk individuals to negative behaviors (e.g., new drugs, new routes of administration, criminal activity) and may place them at increased risk of predation. Second, requiring low risk to attend frequent supervision appointments may interfere with their functioning in other life domains such as family, work, or school. Finally, requiring low risk/low need offenders to receive intensive supervision and treatment can result in a misallocation of our court resources and unnecessary expenditures. In this workshop, we will discuss these challenges and present one court s solution: the development and implementation of a research-informed accelerated track. Participants assigned to this zero tolerance 8-week accelerated track are not required to attend regular status hearings but must provide 8 consecutive weeks of drug-free urines and attend 8 weekly psychoeducational sessions to graduate. This specialized accelerated track has resulted in high rates of graduation, reductions in time to graduation, and low rates of criminal recidivism. We will discuss this unique program within the context of the principles set forth by NADCP earlier this year. To gain a better understanding of the need for risk and need assessment. To gain a better understanding of how to best work with low risk/low need offenders. To learn about one court s implementation of a specialized accelerated track for low risk/low need offenders. Karen Dugosh Research Scientist Treatment Research Institute Philadelphia, Pennsylvania David Festinger Senior Scientist Treatment Research Institute Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 99

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court THURSDAY SESSION D-22 New Jersey s Drug Court: Making a Difference 213 A The New Jersey Statewide Adult Drug Court program includes a unique component that permits judges to obtain independent clinical assessments on program applicants through the use of credentialed clinicians who are also Judiciary employees. These substance abuse evaluators provide each team with impartial and unbiased evaluations for clinical suitability for participation in Drug Court, a DSM-5 diagnosis and a referral to treatment using ASAM criteria. The panelists will provide information on state research to correlate DSM-IV-TR diagnosis with DSM-5. Additionally, panelists will discuss the challenges encountered during the process of implementing a new mandatory sentencing to Drug Court law. Finally, presenters will discuss the NJ Judiciary s commitment to provide extensive training and clinical supervision to its statewide network of substance abuse evaluators. Learn how the NJ Drug Courts have addressed the removal of a dependence diagnosis with the introduction of DSM-5. Review of research to correlate DSM-IV-TR diagnosis with DSM-5. Gain an understanding of the process of providing clinical supervision and advanced training for Judiciary clinicians. Emil Affsa Judiciary Coordinator 2 NJ Judiciary Trenton, New Jersey Jayne Cavanaugh State TASC Coordinator NJ Judiciary Trenton, New Jersey Carol Venditto State Drug Court Manager NJ Judiciary Trenton, New Jersey SESSION D-23 El Rol de la Familia y su Impacto en el Proceso de Recuperación 211 A Esta conferencia pretende demostrar la importancia de la familia y/o personas de apoyo en el proceso de recuperación de los participantes del Programa Drug Court. El proceso de rehabilitación requiere identificar familiares y /o figuras que puedan brindar ese apoyo o servir de modelo para nuestros participantes. A través de los años se ha demostrado que la participación activa de la familia en este proceso aumenta las posibilidades de recuperación del participante. Además, se discutirán temas variados como: la percepción del participante hacia la familia, la percepción del equipo de trabajo sobre el rol familiar y cómo se integran en las terapias, y cómo ayudar a las familias a ser mejores modelos y facilitadores en el proceso. Se pretende establecer el vínculo estrecho entre las relaciones familiares positivas y saludables y el éxito del participante en el Programa. Establecer la importancia de identificar personas de apoyo que puedan servir de facilitadores en el proceso de recuperación. Educar sobre el rol de la familia en el proceso de rehabilitación de los adictos. Demostrar que forjar equipos de coordinación entre el tribunal y las familias enriquecen la efectividad de las Cortes de Droga. Speaker Hon. María del C. Berríos Judge Judicial Branch of Puerto Rico San Juan, Puerto Rico 100 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

Friday Schedule of Events Friday, May 30 7:00 a.m. 7:20 a.m. Come to Your Senses (Facilitated Meditation) Grand Ballroom G/H, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. New Member/First Time Attendee Breakfast Marquis Northwest, Marriott 7:00 a.m. 7:45 a.m. Continental Breakfast in Drug Court Expo Exhibition Hall A 7:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Drug Court Expo Open Exhibition Hall A 7:00 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Registration Convention Center Lobby A 8:00 a.m. 9:30 a.m. Follow the Evidence: A Research Update Arena 9:30 p.m. 10:00 a.m. Break 10:00 a.m. 11:15 a.m. Concurrent Workshops, Session E 11:15 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Lunch on your Own 1:00 p.m. 2:15 p.m. Concurrent General Sessions 2:15 p.m. 2:30 p.m. Break 2:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. Skills Building Workshops FrIday

ARENA Friday, May 30 8:00 a.m. 9:30 a.m. Science Giants Award for Excellence in Drug Court Research and Evaluation Dr. John Goldkamp Accepting the award on behalf of Dr. Goldkamp Hon. E. Rely Vîlcică, Ph.D. Judge (ret.) 4th District, Bucharest, Romania Assistant Professor Department of Criminal Justice Temple University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania GENERAL SESSION Follow The Evidence: A Research Update Whether you are operating an Adult, Juvenile, or Family Drug Court, DWI Court or Mental Health Court, adherence to the model is critical for success. In this presentation, Dr. Doug Marlowe reviews the latest Drug Court research, emphasizing both what practices have been proven to reduce drug use and recidivism, along with practices that practitioners and programs should avoid. this presentation is critical for every Drug Court professional. : Identify the recent research in drug courts. Understand best practices in drug court operations. Speaker Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 TRACK SESSION E Friday, May 30 10:00 a.m. 11:15 a.m. SESSION E-1 Data Collection and Evaluation: Where to Begin? 201 A/B The research is clear: Drug Court works. But does your Drug Court work? Is your program collecting data on participants? What data? Do you have an evaluation plan? Does your court do process and outcome evaluations? This session will outline the best practices in collecting data and evaluating your Drug Court program, ensuring that your court is keeping fidelity to the Ten Key Components and determining if you are having the impact on your participants that you want. One of the critical issues discussed will be the importance of maintaining fidelity to the Drug Court model as your program grows as research demonstrates that programs tend to lose fidelity to the model around 125 participants. A group of national experts will review the research and give practical advice on how to build a system to collect data, evaluate your Drug Court, and ensure program success. Understand the importance of collecting data and performing evaluations. How to monitor and maintain fidelity to the model in a large program. Learn strategies for implementing or enhancing data collection and evaluation in your Drug Court. SESSION E-2 The Grant is Over Now What? Refinancing and Redirection as Real Sustainability Planning for your FDC 201 C If grant funding is your primary resource for funding your FDC, then your FDC may not have the infrastructure to sustain itself in this economic climate. Real sustainability planning involves moving beyond the boundaries of your FDC as a project towards a focus on systems thinking and change. This workshop will explore what sustainability and real systems change looks like by looking at refinancing and redirection strategies along with guiding FDC teams from projectthinking towards thinking. This workshop is only for professionals who do not accept barriers as status quo but rather use them as targets for change. Understand the difference between project thinking vs. systems thinking and the key features of systems change. Learn why issues of scale, targeting, local parallel initiatives, and institutionalization are critical for sustaining your FDC. Identify common barriers for sustainability planning and learn barrier-busting strategies and opportunities for change. Speaker Sid Gardner President Children and Family Futures, Inc. Lake Forest, California FRIDAY Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon Charlene Zil Research Coordinator NPC Research Portland, Oregon 103

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION E-3 Creating an Individualized Juvenile Drug Court 201 D Research tells us that individualized responses, within a Juvenile Drug Court setting, lead to positive outcomes for youth and families who are involved in the juvenile justice system. The 16 Strategies in Practice can be a road map for Juvenile Drug Court professionals when developing individualized case plans, several of the Strategies address this specifically Gender-Appropriate Services, Cultural Competence, Focus on Strengths, Education Linkages, and Goal-Oriented Incentive & Sanctions. When Juvenile Drug Court professionals discover how to implement these Strategies correctly, case planning will become a step-wise, actionable process. This session will focus on practical solutions to implement these Strategies effectively. Participants will learn about why implementing individualized responses in the case planning process will lead to a positive outcome. Participants will learn about specific strategies which guide individualized responses for youth. Participants will learn how to implement defined Strategies within their Juvenile Drug Court program. Jessica Pearce Training Manager National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Reno, Nevada Wendy Schiller Technical Assistance Manager National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Reno, Nevada SESSION E-4 Mental Health Courts: Unique Issues and Research Powered Solutions 202 A/B Problem-solving Courts judge their effectiveness by recidivism, graduation rates, cost effectiveness and abstinence from drugs and alcohol. Mental Health Courts face unique issues including selection criteria, sanctions/incentives and evaluation methods. This presentation discusses fundamental differences between Mental Health Courts and other therapeutic court programs. Program highlights include a look into the current research measuring community impact and importance of the 10 Key Elements. The presentation concludes with recommendations uniquely tailored to MHCs for evaluation research and how this information becomes useful in establishing best practices, community support, funding and sustainability for Mental Health Court Programs. Explain key differences between Mental Health Courts and other therapeutic court programs. Identify current research measuring community impact and the importance of the 10 Key Elements of Mental Health Court. Reveal possible strategies in determining a successful Mental Health Court by using evaluation research. Chelsea Bullard Forensic Psychology Masters Student Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Tulsa, Oklahoma Ron Thrasher Assistant Professor of Forensic Sciences Oklahoma State University Tulsa, Oklahoma SESSION E-6 A Courageous Conversation: Addressing Race in Drug Courts 204 A Some studies have shown that African Americans and Hispanics were less likely than whites to enter or graduate from Drug Courts (Marlowe, 2013). Recent social science research has shown that decisionmaking and choices (i.e., who receives medical care versus those who do not; longer versus shorter criminal sentences) are susceptible to unintentional, implicit or unconscious bias. This interactive session, aligned with the affirmative duty of Drug Courts to ensure access, retention and treatment, will explore how to address racial disparities in Drug Courts. Additionally, the session will highlight the ongoing need among judges, team members and justice partners to engage in a Courageous Conversation about race and implicit bias in Drug Courts. 104 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Describe what is a Courageous Conversation. Explain the relationship between race and success in Drug Courts. Identify effective strategies for improving outcomes for African Americans in Drug Courts. Susan James-Andrews Chairperson Thurgood Marshall Action Coalition Louisville, Kentucky Hon. Stephen Manley Superior Court Judge Santa Clara Reentry Court San Jose, California Kimberly Papillon Judicial Educator The Better Mind Oakland, California Michael Roosevelt Sr. Court Services Analyst Administrative Office of the Courts San Francisco, California Stanley M. Goldstein Drug Court Hall of Fame Tomorrow morning we will induct a new individual or individuals into the Stanley M. Goldstein Drug Court Hall of Fame. Be on hand for the Closing Session and Featured Keynote Speaker at 9:30 a.m. Understand the rationale for identifying and addressing the needs of treatment court participants family members. Articulate the process and outcome evaluation questions about the role of participants family members in court performance. Learn the components of minimal, better and best evaluation strategies to account for these activities. FRIDAY SESSION E-7 Accounting for the Role of Families in Drug Court Evaluations 204 C The statement that every Drug Court is a family Drug Court is advancing from proposition to axiom among practitioners. Drug Court participants are viewed less frequently in isolation and more often as individuals embedded in families. Encouraged by the availability of new assessment approaches, family members issues and needs increasingly are being identified and addressed to promote family strength and capacity for support and to eliminate distractions that threaten participant engagement and recovery. The purpose of this session is to address the implications for evaluation of these evolving practices. This workshop is for Drug Court professionals who are interested in, or actually conducting evaluations in any treatment court setting. Addressing these issues will increase evaluators capacity to conduct comprehensive evaluations that account for and measure the effects of these advances in Drug Court practice. Chad Rodi Research and Evaluation Director Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California Nancy Young Executive Director Children and Family Futures Irvine, California 105

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION E-8 Marijuana 204 B Neuro-imaging has yielded new evidence about the effects on the brain of marijuana use. This presentation will focus on those new findings as well as describe the psychopharmacology of marijuana use from both an acute and chronic use perspective. This session will also highlight the impact of new findings in what works in treating those dependent on marijuana. Identify the neurochemical actions of marijuana in the brain. Identify the symptoms of the acute use of marijuana, its chronic use consequences and withdrawal symptoms. Identify strategies for treating marijuana dependence. Speaker Kenneth Robinson President Correctional Counseling, Inc. Germantown, Tennessee SESSION E-9 Behavior Modification and The Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider 207 C/D Mental Health Courts have moved away from the concept of graduated rewards and sanctions -a key component of Drug Courts -in favor of a broad array of strategies to motivate participants to engage in treatment. In Mental Health Courts, each participant s treatment plan must be highly individualized to address his or her specific clinical needs, each participant responds to incentives and sanctions in idiosyncratic ways, and mental health service providers acknowledge their clients right to make their own treatment decisions. In this context, Mental Health Courts have adapted tactics from Drug Courts but have also created a range of new strategies, both in their court operations and in their partnerships with providers, to help motivate treatment engagement. This workshop will present promising practices drawn from a wide range of Mental Health Courts in New York and California. Gain information about specific strategies and tactics used by operational Mental Health Courts that help motivate participants to engage in treatment and comply with court supervised treatment plans. Learn about factors that have been shown to improve or impair engagement in mental health treatment. Hon. Christine Carpenter Circuit Court Judge 13th Judicial Circuit Columbia, Missouri Hon. Peggy Hora Judge (ret.) National Drug Court Institute Walnut Creek, California SESSION E-10 CBT for LEO s 206 A/B Law enforcement officers, with the advantage of direct community contacts, have a unique opportunity to intervene in the addictions cycle. People suffering from addiction are in the right stage of change during contact with LEO, which creates a prime opportunity to effectuate change in unlearning harmful attitudes and behaviors. This session will combine humor with reality to support and encourage law enforcement officers as pro-social role models to address everyday situations by providing insight into how thought processes cause feelings and behaviors, not external factors. Understanding Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) 106 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 will allow law enforcement officers in problem solving courts to empower addicts to identify their own negative patterns of thinking and move towards responsibility. This session will focus on the personal and professional applications of Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment (CBT) with interactive discussion and activities. Understand CBT as an Evidence-Based Practice and how it applies to you and your work environment. Learn about excuses and patterns of thinking and provide information on self-reflection, role-modeling, and leadership. Practice CBT based approaches and learn redirection techniques to address excuses by challenging thinking, not the individual. Speaker Sara Toms Cognitive-Behavioral Programs Coordinator Wyandotte County Community Corrections Kansas City, Kansas SESSION E-13 Healing Trauma: Strategies for Abused Women 208 A/B This interactive workshop describes the exercises in a new five-session trauma curriculum for women. It reviews the outline and exercises for each session. Topics include: power and abuse, grounding and selfsoothing, and healthy relationships. Healing Trauma (HT) is an adaptation of the best selling, evidencebased Beyond Trauma: A Healing Journey for Women. It is particularly designed for settings requiring a shorter intervention. The program materials consist of a facilitator guide and participant workbook which are on a CD-Rom to allow for easy duplication. The workbook is written in both English and Spanish. To describe a new resource. To demonstrate physical and mental grounding exercises. To utilize a variety of therapeutic interventions. FRIDAY SESSION E-12 Enabling in the Black Community 205 A/B This session discusses how community enabling debilitates the social, educational, and therapeutic conditions of our Juvenile and Adult Drug Court client. Often the African American parent s co-dependency, or the communities desire to protect may give the client irrational entitlements that hinders his/her recovery process while in Drug Court. The parents and communities denial may make them unaware of their behavior. As a result the Drug Court participant becomes stuck and maintains a foothold in the pre-contemplation stage. Opposed to embracing this challenging behavior, this session provides solution for staff, parents, communities and clients that enhance the clinical process toward better outcomes. Speaker Guy Wheeler President Guy A. Wheeler Group Plantation, Florida Speaker Twyla Wilson Psychotherapy and Substance Abuse Services Durham, North Carolina 107

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION E-17 Addressing Seven Common Challenges Drug Courts Are Encountering 207 A/B Recognizing that many Drug Court programs and Drug Court teams are working in isolation of one another, yet dealing with common implementation issues, this session will focus on the ten most frequently encountered challenges Drug Courts are encountering that impact their ability to fully reach their potential in terms of impact and outreach and recommendations for addressing these challenges. The session will build on the findings and recommendations resulting from over 150 on site technical assistance visits and reporting conducted by the BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project and its practitioner-consultants. The panel will focus on the significance of each of the Ten Key Components, constitutional and legal concerns, applicable performance benchmarks, and recommendations for addressing common challenges programs are encountering. Attendees will learn about common challenges many Drug Court programs are facing. Attendees will learn about benchmarks that have been developed for the Key Components. Attendees will learn about other programs facing similar challenges and strategies. Identify due process and other constitutional and legal concerns in Drug Courts. Caroline Cooper Director, Justice Programs Office American University Washington, DC Hon. Dennis Fuchs Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project Washington, DC SESSION E-18 Expand the Evidence Base: Routine Outcomes Monitoring in the Context of Community Reintegration 213 C/D The routine collection of outcomes following completion of drug treatment, when the individual returns to their family and community, is vital to manage quality of care and achieve consistent outcomes, monitor changing client needs, improve satisfaction with treatment, and allocate treatment resources (e.g., evidence-based care). The Drug Court system provides an ideal opportunity to unite courts, probation, treatment, and treatment evaluations aimed at ongoing quality management for two key reasons: 1. the ability to locate clients for a period of time after they leave drug treatment but still have probation/ parole contact requirements; and 2. the ability to monitor corollary post-treatment data such as crime recidivism and other data in the court systems. Broad implementation of specific instruments and procedures for intake, assessment and treatment planning, discharge planning and community reintegration, and Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) evaluation can assist Drug Courts in maintaining the quality of their evidence-based treatments. This workshop will cover four key steps in the Routine Outcome Monitoring process as implemented at Narconon of Oklahoma, a behavioral and social skills based, residential drug rehabilitation program: 1. routine use of specific instruments and treatment planning tools at enrollment, 2. a format for Community Re-integration based on client needs assessment, 3. an economical staff-based routine outcome monitoring (ROM) system using a 20-item core measure telephone survey, and 4. the evaluation of returned data and use for quality management at the treatment facility. The workshop will also cover standardized procedures for staff training, structuring enrollment and exit interviews that make outcomes monitoring possible, and maintaining post-treatment telephone contact to produce greater than 80 percent follow-up rates. 108 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Learn a complete community reintegration model and how to incorporate re-integration steps into the Drug Court system. Understand how key steps and the validated ROM questionnaire lead to complete and reliable data for outcomes monitoring. Learn how a demonstration project used ROM data to ensure quality care, improve abstinence rates, address recidivism. FRIDAY Clark Carr President Narconon International Los Angeles, California Richard Lennox Scientist Chestnut Health Systems Hillsborough, North Carolina Marie Sternquist Scientist Chestnut Global Partners Anchorage, Alaska SESSION E-20 Ethical Considerations for Attorneys and Judges in Problem-Solving Courts 212 A/B Attorneys and judges in Drug Courts face a variety of unique ethical situations. This session discusses some of the ethical issues that rise for the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys working in a Drug Court. Identify ethical concerns for judges and attorneys working in Drug Court. Discuss scenarios of potential ethical dilemmas raised in Drug Court. Speaker Jim Egar Chief Defender Monterey County Public Defender Salinas, California SESSION E-21 Statewide Implementation of the RANT in Missouri 213 B Research has demonstrated outcomes are influenced by how well drug-involved offenders are matched to services suited to both their clinical needs and criminogenic risks. Evidence has shown programs who focus their efforts and resources on individuals who are High Risk/High Need reduce crime approximately twice as much as those serving less serious offenders and return approximately fifty percent greater cost-benefit to their community. Outdated program requirements in Missouri created a waste of scarce resources and, in some cases, negative exposure to more seriously impaired peers. The Risk and Needs Triage (RANT ) is an assessment and intervention classification tool developed by the Treatment Research Institute (TRI) that evaluates an offender s criminogenic risks and clinical needs to determine the level and type of criminal justice supervision and treatment services where research suggests the offender stands the best chance of success. The Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) received a BJA grant to purchase the RANT tool and integrate it into Adult Drug Court programs. The RANT assessment tool has provided Drug Court personnel in Missouri with a classification 109

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY tool to determine the appropriate level and type of criminal justice supervision and treatment services to efficiently utilize treatment court funding. This session will provide an overview of the RANT, how it was implemented statewide in Missouri, and review the research findings and results of the implementation. Identify the factors to consider in implementing a statewide assessment tool for Adult Drug Court participants. Understand how an assessment tool can impact the operation of a Drug Court and participant success. Recognize the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing a statewide assessment tool. Richard Morrisey Family, Juvenile and Treatment Court Services Manager Office of State Courts Administrator Jefferson City, Missouri Angela Plunkett State Drug Court Coordinator Office of State Courts Administrator Jefferson City, Missouri Lisa Wilcox Research Analyst Court Business Services Division Office of State Courts Administrator Jefferson City, Missouri SESSION E-22 Implementing an Education Program in Your Drug Court 213 A This session will present two approaches to enhancing access to education for Drug Court participants. The first was developed in 2008 by an individual Drug Court in Tulsa, Oklahoma where a full-time educational coordinator works with the nearly 20 percent of participants across dockets who enter the program without a GED. The initiative has been hugely successful, with 95 percent of graduates obtaining a GED or higher degree. The second approach, developed by the New York State Court System, the State University of New York, and the Center for Court Innovation, targets the Young Adult population (16-24 year olds). By forging partnerships among local community colleges, Drug Courts and treatment agencies, the initiative s goal is to build a roadmap for Drug Courts to use to provide the support and resources necessary to receive pre-collegiate services, navigate the college enrollment and financial aid systems, and receive assistance in the early stages of attending classes. The presenters will describe the process of building their programs, the challenges involved, and the keys to successful implementation. Gain knowledge about the role of education in creating employment opportunities and reducing recidivism in Drug Court participants. Discuss the process and different approaches available in creating the bridge between Drug Court and educational opportunities. Explore adapting the educational programs for use in other states. Rose Ewing Program Director Tulsa COURTS Programs Community Service Counsel Tulsa, Oklahoma Valerie Raine Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York 110 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION E-23 La Interseccion se Justicia Terapeutica Y Justicia Restaurativa 211 A Entender el papel que la víctima, familia y comunidad toman en estos dos métodos. Como identificar las diferencias entre procesos jurídicas terapéuticas, restauritivas y punitivas. Como el imputado toma responsabilidad por su conducta en los sistemas terapéuticas y restaurativas. Definir Justicia Terapéutica. Definir Justicia Restauritiva. Como destingir la ofensa del acusado. Hon. Rogelio R. Flores Superior Court Judge Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara Santa Maria, California Lyra Monroe Provider Restorative Justice Resources Santa Barbara, California CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS CG-1 THROUGH CG-8 Friday, May 30 1:00 p.m. 2:15 p.m. SESSION CG-1 Matching Service to Need: Exploring What High Risk/High Need Means for FDCs Arena One of the most important decisions faced by each family Drug Court is determining its target population and what resources are needed to serve them. What criteria should drive these decisions? A significant amount of research in the adult criminal Drug Court setting has addressed eligibility criteria and which populations these programs can serve most effectively namely high-risk, high-need offenders. This workshop presentation will explore the high-risk, high-need principle and how this applies to FDCs. A working definition of these concepts will be offered along with implications on key FDC processes, including screening and assessment, staff training, and partnerships needed to provide the scope of services needed to match services to needs. This workshop will serve as a work-group discussion which will advance FDC policy and practice for the entire field going forward. Explore how high-risk, high need are defined for child welfare clients, including families affected by parental substance use. Explore a collaborative framework for determining target population in FDC, which include identifying clients, matching needs with services, and monitoring progress. Explore lessons learned from Adult Drug Courts and potential next steps to advance FDC policy and practice Douglas Marlowe Chief of Science, Law, and Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alexandria, Virginia Nancy Young Executive Director Children and Family Futures Irvine, California FRIDAY 111

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION CG-2 Innovations in Health Care and Criminal Justice Reform 210 A/B From the Affordable Care Act to the Justice Reinvestment Initiative, the U.S. federal government is currently leading massive reforms in health care and criminal/ juvenile justice. Drug Courts and other Problem-Solving Courts are in a unique position to benefit from and have a key role in these efforts. In this session heads of three federal agencies: the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment will discuss their agency s relevant reform initiatives. Moderator Kirstin Frescoln Owner Facilitated Community Solutions Chapel Hill, North Carolina H. Westley Clark Director Center for Subtance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) Rockville, Maryland Robert L. Listenbee, Jr. Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Washington, DC Denise O Donnell Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Washington, DC SESSION CG-3 Reentry Ten Key Components 207 A/B Reentry Courts have unique target populations and, therefore, unique entry issues, service needs, and graduation requirements. Yet although many Reentry Courts share common characteristics, they can be very different from state to state. The National Association of Drug Court Professionals board of directors has taken on the considerable task of drafting key components for Reentry Courts, through the leadership of its Reentry Committee. This session will outline the progress of that committee, along with providing a discussion of the relationship of the key components to the current research in Reentry Courts. Understand the progress on the development of key components of Reentry Courts. Identify the critical issues outlined in the draft components. Understand the state of the research with regard to Reentry Courts. Shannon Carey Senior Research Associate NPC Research Portland, Oregon Charles R. Robinson Chief Probation Officer - Director Travis County Community Supervision and Corrections Department Austin, Texas Hon. Keith Starrett U.S. District Judge Southern District of Mississippi Hattiesburg, Mississippi SESSION CG-4 Establishing the First Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia: Strategies, Processes, Outcomes 212 A/B In April, 2012, Judge Greg Levine was awarded a Churchill Fellowship to study Family Drug Treatment Courts in the US and the UK. In January, 2014, the 112 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 To examine the process of adapting and adopting the Family Drug Treatment Court model through an Australian case study. To understand the cultural differences in Australia and the challenges of implementing therapeutic jurisprudential processes. To evaluate the unique ways in which the Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia differs from its counterparts in the United States. FRIDAY very first Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia will hear its first case. This workshop examines the journey of researching, networking, marketing and model-building that led to this exciting and historical development in the Australian Legal System. The workshop will comprise three components. The first will examine the findings of the Churchill Fellowship research conducted by Judge Levine and his wife Professor Barbara Kamler; the discoveries and observations they made of the six Family Drug Treatment Courts they visited; their conviction that the FDTC is the most effective intervention a court can provide to enhance parental rehabilitation and family reunification; and their conclusions about the potential for a similar program to be set up in the Children s Court of Victoria, Australia. The second component will set the scene for pioneering a Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia. It will provide the audience with an insight into the cultural nuances that distinguish the legal and political landscapes of the United States and Australia. It will detail the specific challenges of introducing therapeutic jurisprudential programs into a traditionally adversarial system and the problems faced in doing so. Finally, it will outline 4 key elements that explain how these challenges were overcome, making Australia s first Family Drug Treatment Court a reality. The final component of the workshop will detail the Australian model highlighting the specific differences between the FDTC in Victoria, and those of its counterparts in the United States. It will particularly focus on the eligibility criteria, behavior modification strategies, recovery model, peer mentoring, and aftercare components, all of which are key differences in the Australian model. Elisa Buggy Project Manager - Family Drug Treatment Court Children s Court of Victoria Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Hon. Peggy Hora Judge (ret.) National Drug Court Institute Walnut Creek, California Hon. Greg Levine Judge Family Drug Treatment Court - Victoria Australia Melbourne, Victoria SESSION CG-5 Taking Drug Court To Scale: Three Statewide Initiatives 213 C/D State legislatures, judiciaries, and governor s offices around the nation have been wrestling with the problem of providing alternatives to incarceration. Over the last decade, an unprecedented number of statewide initiatives have increased both the census and number of Drug Courts and other problem-solving courts. Three of these initiatives are: (1) New Jersey s mandatory Drug Court assessment/enrollment statute; (2) the Texas initiative to implement a Drug Court in every jurisdiction with a population of over 200,000; and (2) California s Justice Realignment Initiative, sending tens of thousands of prison inmates to local jails. This presentation discusses these initiatives, their impact on local jurisdictions and Drug Courts, and how local Drug Courts and reentry courts are handling the influx of new participants. 113

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY Identify statewide legislative, judicial, or executive decisions that have changed the approach to Drug Courts or other Problem-solving Courts. Understand the impact of these changes on Drug Courts in three distinct state criminal justice systems. Hon. Stephen Manley Superior Court Judge Santa Clara Reentry Court San Jose, California Hon. Ruben Reyes District Judge 72nd District Court Lubbock, Texas Hon. Sheila Venable Hudson County Drug Court Judge NJ Judiciary Jersey City, New Jersey justice system. Each expert addressed one of the following elements: disproportionate minority contact, environment of care, trauma-informed assessment and interventions, cross-system collaboration, as well as youth and family community partnerships. Included in the panel of presenters, was a youth representative with previous involvement in the juvenile justice system, who significantly contributed to the objective of this Roundtable meeting. This workshop will 1) review these essential elements of a trauma-informed juvenile justice system, 2) identify best practice examples that speak to each element, and 3) provide a platform for a youth representative to highlight their perspective in creating a trauma-informed juvenile justice system. This workshop will encourage active discussion from the audience and offer a variety of online resources that can support the adoption of trauma-informed juvenile justice best practices including five new NCTSN practice briefs that were produced as a result of this Roundtable meeting. Sponsored by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges SESSION CG-6 Implementing and Supporting Trauma- Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network 201 A/B Creating trauma-informed child and family service systems has been an integral focus of the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) since its inception in 2001. The juvenile justice system, in particular, has been strategically targeted due to the strikingly high prevalence of trauma exposure and traumatic stress among justice-involved youth. A critical step in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems is to understand the key elements and best practices of a trauma-informed juvenile justice system. In February 2013, the NCTSN took this step by convening the Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Roundtable, which included trauma experts and key stakeholders, as well as clinicians, supervisors, and juvenile justice staff that provide services to youth in various juvenile justice settings across the country. As part of the Roundtable, five national experts in juvenile justice were assembled to advance our objective of developing the key elements and best practices of a trauma-informed juvenile Participants will learn key elements in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems. Participants will be able to identify best practice examples associated with key elements of traumainformed juvenile justice. Participants will have a better understanding of the crucial role of youth engagement in informing best practices. Steve Avalos Youth Mentor Homeboy Industries Los Angeles, California Kelly Decker Service Systems Program Coordinator National Center for Child Traumatic Stress Los Angeles, California Carly Dierkhising Special Projects Manager, Juvenile Justice National Center for Child Traumatic Stress Los Angeles, California 114 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION CG-7 Confidentiality 204 B This session will explore federal confidentiality laws and their impact on Drug Treatment Courts. Session content will include a breakdown of the two major statutes involved; and a detailed discussion of proper consents to Release Confidential Information. The Laws covered will be 42 C.F.R. Part 2 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The presentation will be about who is protected, what is protected, who must comply and exceptions to rules of disclosure. Understand Consents to Release Confidential Information. Special Considerations for the Criminal Justice Population. Understand Revocable vs. Irrevocable Consents. Understand Requirements for Proper Written Consent. Steve Hanson Director Division of Treatment and Practice Innovation Bureau of Addiction Treatment Centers Rochester, New York Valerie Raine Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York SESSION CG-8 What Judges and other Practitioners Should Know about Treatment Services 209 A/B This workshop will address the key principles and underlying research relating to the treatment of substance abuse and co-occurring disorders and their application to the design and services Drug Court programs should provide. Drawing on the resource guide developed by the BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project by Jeffrey Kushner and Dr. Roger Peters entitled: A Primer for Drug Court Judges and Other Practitioners on Drug Court Treatment Services and Use of Evidence Based Practices. The overall focus of the session will provide guidance for judges and other non-treatment professionals to be better consumers of treatment services and more effectively work with local treatment providers. Topics covered will include: (1) essential components of an effective Drug Court treatment program; (2) the diagnostic and assessment process; (3) dealing with the range of special populations Drug Courts need to serve; and (4) addressing special issues rural Drug Court programs are encountering. Attendees will learn about the scientific basis for diagnosing substance addiction and co-occurring disorders and current diagnosis. Attendees will learn about the distinctive aspects of treatment services for substance abuse and co-occurring disorders in a Drug Court. Attendees will learn about effective strategies for addressing common challenges rural Drug Courts have encountered. Jeffrey Kushner Statewide Drug Court Administrator Supreme Court of Montana Victor, Montana Roger Peters Professor Department of Mental Health Law and Policy University of South Florida Tampa, Florida FRIDAY 115

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS AFTERNOON SESSIONS Friday, May 30 2:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. SESSION SB-33 Health Care Reform: Understanding and Navigating the Affordable Care Act 210 A/B Included in health care reform is the establishment of universal Medicaid eligibility for childless adults with incomes below 133% of poverty come January 1, 2014. As many, if not most, of Drug Courts clients income is likely to fall below that level, the availability of Medicaid as a funding source is likely to create significant changes within the Drug Court system. This session will review an experience in the state of Washington in providing expanded coverage for individuals with a substance use disorder and discuss the implications of that data within the context of health care reform. Speaker Steven Rosenberg President Community Oriented Correctional Health Services Oakland, California Dan Mistak Research Associate COCHS Oakland, California SESSION SB-34 Judicial Role and Ethics: Best Practices 212 A/B The research is clear. The Judge s role is critical to the success of a Drug Court. This session will review the research, including the minimum optimal time for a Drug Court judge to remain on the bench, the parameters of successful status hearings with Drug Court participants, and the need for training specific to the judicial role. The presentation will also review the ethical dilemmas often faced by Drug Court judges, and strategies for building a successful Drug Court. If you are a new or experienced Drug Court judge, this session is for you. Identify the best practices for Adult Drug Court judges. Learn common ethical issues faced by Drug Court judges. Identify strategies for improving Drug Court outcomes through research. Speaker Hon. Peggy Hora Judge (ret.) National Drug Court Institute Walnut Creek, California 116 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION SB-35 Substance Abuse Treatment: Best Practices 204 B Substance abuse treatment is the cornerstone of a successful Drug Court program. This presentation will review the research and identify best practices of substance abuse treatment that every Drug Court practitioner should know. The presentation will also include strategies for incorporating evidence based practices into your treatment program. Identify the best practices in substance abuse treatment for Adult Drug Courts. Learn the research supporting the best practices. Identify strategies to incorporate evidence based practices into your treatment program. Speaker Terrence Walton Director of Treatment DC Pre-Trial Services Agency Washington, DC SESSION SB-36 The Trauma-Addiction Connection: Spirals of Recovery and Healing 201 B Addiction, mental health, and trauma are often addressed as separate issues. Yet, substance abuse and mental health providers continue to report a clear and consistent association between the incidence of trauma and behavioral health issues. This presentation offers a theoretically-based comprehensive treatment model that integrates theories of addiction, women s and men s psychological development, and trauma. There is a growing evidence-base documenting the impact of child neglect and abuse, as well as other forms of trauma (including combat) on health, mental health and behavior. The training provides an overview of the elements needed for creating gender-responsive and trauma-informed services and guiding principles for designing services are discussed. Additionally, there is a focus on interactive exercises that demonstrate specific treatment strategies that counselors can use with clients. Describe levels of violence. Define trauma and trauma-informed. Describe the process of trauma. Explore the connections between addiction, mental health and trauma. Describe four critical issues for gender-responsive services. Demonstrate and provide specific interventions. FRIDAY Speaker Twyla Wilson Psychotherapy and Substance Abuse Services Durham, North Carolina 117

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION SB-38 (MARRIOTT) Drug Court Coordinator Forum! Grand Ballroom A/B, Marriott Drug Court coordinators are the glue that holds the Drug Court together. A coordinator wears many hats a few include grant writing, budgeting, data collection and file coordination, financial planning, securing continuing education, and finding other monetary and nonmonetary resources. This special form for Drug Court coordinators will provide assistance in three critical areas: free online resources; grant writing tips; and data collection/planning for an evaluation. First, you will hear from the nation s foremost providers of Drug Court training and technical assistance and walk through an online demonstration of distance learning projects. Next, you will receive a seminar in grant writing; and finally, you will learn the fundamentals of data collection and evaluation planning. Bring your laptop and prepare to work! Identify online resources for Drug Courts. Identify grant writing tips. Understand the fundamentals of evaluation planning. Phil Breitenbucher FDC Program Director Children and Family Futures, Inc. Irvine, California Caroline Cooper Director Justice Programs Office American University Washington, DC Carolyn Hardin Senior Executive Director NDCI - The Professional Services Branch of NADCP Alexandria, Virginia Sonya Harper Project Director of NDCRC NDCI - The Professional Services Branch of NADCP Alexandria, Virginia Tara Kunkel Principal Court Management Consultant National Center for State Courts Williamsburg, Virginia Valerie Raine Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Dennis Reilly Deputy Director, Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Greg Roth Associate Director Drug Court Programs Center for Court Innovation New York, New York Lauren Van Schilfgaarde Tribal Law Specialist Tribal Law and Policy Institute West Hollywood, California Michelle White Principal Court Consultant National Center for State Courts Denver, Colorado 118 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION SB-39 Challenges and Solutions Facing Rural Drug Courts 209 A/B Rural Drug Courts face a variety of challenges, from transportation to a lack of treatment services. During this interactive session three jurisdictions will discuss their innovations to provide better access to transportation, evidence based treatment, enhanced supervision, and wraparound services in a rural setting. Identify the challenges facing rural Drug Courts. Identify strategies for confronting these challenges. Moderator Hon. Andrea Vandeloecht Judge Chariton County Drug Court Keytesville, Missouri Bobby DeBatt Treatment Provider Westcare Arizona Bullhead City, Arizona Angela Plunkett State Drug Court Coordinator Office of State Courts Administrator Jefferson City, Missouri Miranda Rose Coordinator Faribault, Martin and Jackson Multi-County Adult Substance Abuse Court and Family Dependency Treatment Court Fairmont, Minnesota Hon. Robert Walker Judge Fifth Judicial District, Minnesota Fairmont, Minnesota Hon. Rick Williams Judge Mohave County Superior Court Kingman, Arizona SESSION SB-40 The Fundamentals of Designer Drugs: A Primer Arena Designer drugs are not new, but they do represent an emergent threat to Drug Court practitioners. Drugs with new names, new abuse trends and new control challenges - detection methods and laws that often lag behind their appearance. This session is designed for new Drug Court team members and will discuss the emergence of new designer drugs such as synthetic cannabinoids, bath salts and what s coming next. Due to the limited drug detection options, designer drug use by Drug Court clients can result in continued addiction that is hidden from court scrutiny. This presentation will provide facts about these designer drugs including information on their origin, their chemical composition, their physical effects, their detection and the legal efforts to ban their sale. Gain fundamental knowledge about designer drugs. Understand the history and development of designer drugs. Describe the two major categories of current designer drugs and how their differ. Illustrate knowledge regarding approaches to controlling designer drugs in your court. Speaker Paul Cary Director Toxicology and Drug Monitoring Lab University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri FRIDAY 119

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court FRIDAY SESSION SB-41 Women in Drug Treatment Courts: Sexual Assault as the Underlying Trauma 207 A/B Many women in Drug Courts are self-medicating the psychological pain of childhood and adult sexual and physical violence. When drug and alcohol treatment programs fail to address the underlying trauma, women are often unsuccessful in completing treatment programs and maintaining sobriety. This presentation explores the research on substance abuse among female sexual assault victims and the role of Drug Courts and treatment programs in their recovery. Although most of the research focuses on women victims of sexual trauma, we will also address the impact of sexual assault on male victims and the implications for Drug Treatment Courts. Participants will better understand the high rate of substance abuse among women who have been sexually abused. Participants will be more knowledgeable about the nexus between sexual abuse, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and substance abuse, and the implications for Drug Treatment Courts. Participants will discuss the essential components of a substance abuse treatment program for women who have been sexually abused. Participants will address the impact of sexual assault on male victims. Speaker Claudia Bayliff Legal Momentum Project Attorney National Judicial Education Program Falls Church, Virginia 120 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

Saturday Schedule of Events Saturday, May 31 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Convention Center Level 2 Foyer and Anaheim Marriott Ballroom Foyer 7:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. Registration (closed during Closing Ceremony) Convention Center Lobby A 9:30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. Closing Ceremony Arena 11:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. Break 11:45 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Concurrent General Sessions 8:00 a.m. 9:15 a.m. Discipline Specific Breakouts See Page 6 9:15 a.m. 9:30 a.m. Break Saturday

Notes

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 ARENA Saturday, May 31 9:30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. CLOSING CEREMONY Welcoming Remarks Featured SATURDAY 2014 Stanley M. Goldstein Hall of Fame Induction DWI Court Leadership Award Cultural Leadership Award Robert Listenbee Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Honorable Mark R. Rosekind, PhD National Transportation Safety Board Kevin Sabet Co-founder Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) Paul Williams Singer, Songwriter, Actor, Author and Recovery Advocate Performance The Honorable Gay Polk-Payton 123

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court SATURDAY CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS CG-9 THROUGH CG-17 Saturday, May 31 11:45 a.m. 1:00 p.m. SESSION CG-9 Understanding the Impact of the ACA -New Benefits and Challenges for Adult Drug Courts 209 A/B Considerations of the potential benefits and challenges associated with implementation of the Affordable Care Act on Adult Drug Court participants and operations will be explored. We will discuss issues related to whether states are accessing their own or the Federal health exchange, implications of Medicaid expansion or non-expansion, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of whether the state s courts or substance abuse treatment agency oversee Adult Drug Court operations. Understand the common features of the ACA in both Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states and State versus Federal exchanges. Identify critical questions about the ACA and how it impacts Adult DTC operations and participants. Understand essential information about the ACA and how it impacts DTC operations. Speaker Kirstin Frescoln Owner Facilitated Community Solutions Chapel Hill, North Carolina SESSION CG-10 Leadership Role of the Drug Court Judge to Sustain the Drug Court Program Over the Long Term 201 A/B This session will address for newer Drug Court judges in particular --and others --the leadership role that Drug Court judges need to play to sustain Drug Court programs and promote the continuing broad scale multi-agency involvement under the court s leadership that is essential for Drug Courts to be effective. The session will draw upon the experiences and perspectives of founding Drug Court judges over the years and build on the judicial leadership initiative being coordinated by the BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project. The various components of this leadership role will be discussed with the overall focus upon promoting an understanding of the important role Drug Court judges must play outside of the courtroom to ensure that all of the moving parts that are critical to ensuring the effectiveness of Drug Courts are in place and that essential systems that do not traditionally work collaboratively together, are doing so productively and in conformity with evidence based practices. Attendees will learn strategies founding Drug Court judges utilized to develop large scale community support. Attendees will learn strategies judges have used effectively to develop partnerships with agencies. Attendees will learn strategies judges have used to effectively work with treatment providers in support of the Drug Court program. Hon. Richard Gebelein Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court TA Project Washington, DC Hon. Louis Presenza Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court T.A. Project Washington, DC 124 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Hon. William Schma Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court T.A. Project Washington, DC Hon. Robert Ziemian Judge District Court Dedham, Massachusetts SATURDAY SESSION CG-11 Through a Child s Eyes: Understanding Addiction and Recovery 207 A/B While it s long been held that alcoholism and other drug addictions are a family disease, there are few opportunities for children to be an integral part of the treatment and recovery process. When parents, foster parents, or grandparents also participate in the children s program, they are empowered with effective parenting skills and let go of much of their guilt and shame, powerful triggers for relapse. Kids have a unique perspective in viewing the world. Come learn how children see addiction in their families. More importantly, witness how they embrace the healing process. List the healing stages for children from addicted families. Describe two activities which assist children in the recovery process. Share two strategies which encourage parents to allow their children to participate in a children s program. Speaker Jerry Moe National Director of Children s Programs Betty Ford Center Rancho Mirage, California SESSION CG-12 The Fundamentals of Urine Specimen Tampering Arena The ramifications of a positive drug test (i.e. sanction, program expulsion, imprisonment, etc.) combined with the denial component of substance abuse often create circumstances whereby clients feel the need to beat the drug test by tampering with their urine sample. Sample tampering represents a significant challenge to the court s mission and can threaten to undermine the legitimacy of the court s policies and procedures as well as its decisions. This session is for new Drug Court team members and will discuss many issues associated with client specimen tampering - dilution, adulteration and substitution. Gain fundamental knowledge about urine specimen tampering. Understand the importance of urine creatinine measurements and the best way to use these levels in a therapeutic context. Describe two major categories of specimen tampering and how to gain program control. Speaker Paul Cary Director Toxicology and Drug Monitoring Lab University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri 125

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court SATURDAY SESSION CG-13 ADHD and its Impact on Our Jail and Treatment Populations 212 A/B Research shows that adolescents and adults with ADHD, and its co-occurring conditions run a 50% higher risk of Substance Abuse Disorder and when a Conduct Disorder is present, that elevated risk triples. Furthermore, students from currently underserved communities share a higher risk of incarceration. While ADHD and its co-occurring conditions does not discriminate across racial, cultural and socioeconomic boundaries, the access to services does in fact discriminate harshly in these communities. Studies show that while ADHD is prevalent in approximately 8% of the general population, it can be as high as over 60% in jail. Moreover, inmates with ADHD and other mental health impairment stay in the system up to 5 times longer than inmates without such impairments. This situation is made worse by the complete lack of adequate screening, medication, therapeutic and educational support that students are entitled to by law. This leads many of these adolescents with little or no options for a productive future and so many of these students recidivize. This program will explore the current status if individuals with ADHD in the juvenile/criminal justice systems including the reasons why children and adults represent a higher risk for contact with the juvenile/ criminal justice systems which is often magnified by the presence of co-existing conditions along with alcohol and substance abuse. This situation is further compounded by the fact that substance abuse disorder and ADHD and its co-occurring conditions are discussed and treated exclusively from each other. The program will explore the need for a major systemic change in how mental illness and substance abuse are inextricably interwoven, and to provide a model that combines these two approaches to look at some of the underlying causes of substance abuse as well as those that can greatly magnify its affects. Educate systemic stakeholders about the higher incidence of ADHD and its co-occurring conditions in the juvenile/criminal justice systems. Educate key stakeholders in the system about the significant relationship between mental illness and substance abuse. Offer a new model combining mental health and substance abuse treatment to significantly reduce recidivism. Speaker Robert Tudisco Executive Director Edge Foundation Eastchester, New York 126 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 SESSION CG-16 Now That We Have Best Practice Standards, What Do We Do With Them? 201 C/D This workshop will explore a range of potential uses for the new Best Practice Standards. From training template to certification model, the standards were written for a variety of uses. The presenters will discuss how to encourage buy-in from Drug Court stakeholders and options for operationalizing the standards. A checklist for measuring compliance with the best practices will be reviewed, and different models of ensuring compliance will be presented. Finally, tips for conducting successful monitoring visits will be discussed. Attendees will learn various ways to use the Best Practice Standards document to improve practices in their courts. Attendees will learn how to adapt the standards to their local Drug Court culture. Attendees will learn strategies for making site visits productive. Hon. Dennis Fuchs Judge (ret.) BJA Drug Court Technical Assistance Project Washington, DC Richard Schwermer Assistant State Court Administrator Utah AOC Salt Lake City, Utah SESSION CG-17 Effective Cognitive-Behavioral Programming with MRT 204 B The purpose of this workshop is to provide participants with an overview of cognitive-behavioral approaches and their use with at-risk populations. In addition, an overview of Moral Reconation Therapy s use with treatment resistant clients will also be presented. Specific information will be presented regarding implementation and results from the use of MRT as a primary treatment modality. The participants will receive a description and overview of cognitive-behavioral programming. The participants will understand how cognitivebehavioral interventions differ from traditional correctional treatment methods. The participants will understand how cognitivebehavioral interventions gain their treatment effectiveness. The participants will review the latest research finding regarding MRT & cognitive-behavioral interventions. The participants will have basic understanding of effective implementation strategies for cognitivebehavioral programs such as Moral Reconation Therapy. Speaker Kenneth Robinson President Correctional Counseling, Inc. Germantown, Tennessee SATURDAY 127

NADCP is the premier national membership, training, and advocacy organization for the Drug Court model, representing over 27,000 multi-disciplinary justice professionals and community leaders. NADCP hosts the largest annual training conference on drugs and crime in the world and provides 130 training and technical assistance events each year through its professional service branches, the National Drug Court Institute, the National Center for DWI Courts and Justice for Vets: The National Veterans Treatment Court Clearinghouse. NADCP publishes numerous scholastic and practitioner publications critical to the growth and fidelity of the Drug Court model and works tirelessly in the media, on Capitol Hill, and in state legislatures to improve the response of the American justice system to substance abusing and mentally ill offenders through policy, legislation, and appropriations. Visit AllRise.org. Professional Service Divisions The mission of the GCDTC is to reduce substance abuse, crime, and recidivism throughout the world by promoting and advocating the establishment of Drug Treatment Courts. The GCDTC aims to achieve these goals through; consulting with governments and NGOs worldwide about the principles of Drug Treatment Courts and other therapeutic responses to the drug problem; consulting with jurisdictions worldwide that want to establish Drug Treatment Courts, including startup information and training; informing Drug Treatment Courts across the world on developments in international drug policy; consistently surveying and reporting international Drug Treatment Court activity; maintaining an international database and disseminating the latest developments and research to assist international Drug Treatment Courts with their operations; and facilitating discussion among international Drug Treatment Courts about using the latest research and practices. Practitioners around the world use GCDTC website to maintain their country s Drug Treatment Court history, research, statistics and progress by submitting this information to the world s only Drug Treatment Court wiki pages. Visit globaldrugcourts.org. Justice for Vets believes that no veteran or military service member should suffer from gaps in service, or the judicial system when they return to their communities. As the stewards of the Veterans Treatment Court movement, we keep veterans out of jail and connect them to the benefits and treatment they have earned; saving their lives, families, and futures, and saving tax dollars for the American public. Justice For Vets will ensure that the criminal justice system effectively identifies, assesses, and responds to all justice-involved veterans appropriately, and will lead the national effort to establish Veterans Treatment Courts within reach of every veteran in need. As the national leader, Justice For Vets will aggressively advocate for Veterans Treatment Courts and mobilize the public to take action to join us in ensuring that no veteran is left behind. Visit JusticeForVets.org. NCDC is the only dedicated advocacy, policy, training and technical support organization for DWI Courts in the nation. Dedicated to delivering research-driven practices to reduce impaired driving recidivism nationwide, the NCDC is designed to expand DWI Courts nationwide, improve DWI Court operations through training and technical assistance, and maintain operational standards for DWI Courts. Visit dwicourts.org. NDCI has emerged as the preeminent source of research-driven training and technical assistance for Drug Court and Problem Solving Court professionals. Developed in conjunction with leading researchers and experienced Drug Court practitioners. NDCI seeks to improve Drug Court operations through a tiered training series. These trainings include the Drug Court Planning Initiative (DCPI) training designed for local jurisdictional teams planning to implement an Adult, Family, Veterans and/or DWI Drug Court; Comprehensive Drug Court Practitioner Training for judges, prosecutors, law enforcement, defense attorneys, probation & parole, treatment providers and other key Drug Court professionals; Advanced Subject-Matter Training which target topical aspects of Drug Court operation; onsite and Office-Based Technical Assistance (TA). NDCI supports investigative projects aimed at the development of more effective Drug Court and Problem Solving Court policies and procedures. NDCI also disseminates important Drug Court specific publications aimed at improving court operations. Visit NDCI.org.

Exhibitors and Maps Exhibitors and Maps

Notes

E FE E A/W NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Drug Court Expo Exhibit Hall A ACT (Advanced Computer Technologies) Booth Number: 414 Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Booth Number: 327 Alkermes, Inc. Booth Number: 539 American Court & Drug Testing Services Booth Number: 506 American Drug Screening Corporation Booth Number: 424 American Screening Corporation Booth Number: 307 Avertest Booth Number: 302 BI Incorporated Booth Number: 400 CAADAC Booth Number: 406 Call2Test Booth Number: 301 CARF International Booth Number: 315 Emerge Monitoring Inc Booth Number: 300 Immunalysis Booth Number: 329 Integrated Management Solutions Booth Number: 404 Intoximeters Inc. Booth Number: 320 Marijuana Anonymous Booth Number: 326 Medical Disposables Corp Booth Number: 419 MHS Inc Booth Number: 418 NACoA-Celebrating Families! Booth Number: 524 Narcotics Anonymous World Services Booth Number: 325 National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare (NCSACW) Booth Number: 521 National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Booth Number: 520 FOOD/CONCESSIONS FOOD/CONCESSIONS 129 228 229 328 329 428 127 226 227 326 327 426 125 224 225 324 325 424 221 320 321 420 219 318 319 418 217 316 317 416 215 314 315 414 213 312 313 211 310 311 410 207 306 307 406 205 304 305 404 203 302 303 402 201 300 301 400 STAGE DANCE FLOOR 417 516 517 616 415 514 515 614 413 512 513 612 411 510 511 610 405 504 401 FOOD/CONCESSIONS 528 529 628 629 728 729 427 526 527 626 627 726 727 425 524 525 624 625 724 725 421 520 521 620 621 720 419 518 519 618 619 718 506 641 740 539 639 738 723 LOBBY Center for Court Innovation Booth Number: 625 Central Recovery Press Booth Number: 305 Children and Family Futures, Inc. Booth Number: 421 Cocaine Anonymous World Services Booth Number: 324 Correctional Counseling, Inc. Booth Number: 402 CourtView Justice Solutions Booth Number: 415 CRC Health Group Booth Number: 413 Drug Testing Program Management, Inc. Booth Number: 416 elab Solutions Booth Number: 401 Norchem Booth Number: 510 Orasure Technologies, Inc. Booth Number: 428 Oxford House, Inc. Booth Number: 314 Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. Booth Number: 526 Premier Biotech Inc. Booth Number: 328 Professional Online Testing Solutions, Inc. Booth Number: 310 Randox Booth Number: 512 SCRAM of California Booth Number: 528 SCRAM Systems Booth Number: 427 Sentinel Offender Services Booth Number: 417 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Booth Number: 405 Smart Start, Inc. Booth Number: 420 SoberLink, Inc Booth Number: 303 Sovereign Health Group Booth Number: 311 StreeTime Technologies Booth Number: 328 TestDay Corporation Booth Number: 504 The Change Companies Booth Number: 411 The National Judicial College Booth Number: 316 The SASSI Booth Number: 511 Thermo Fisher Scientific Booth Number: 410 Total Court Services Booth Number: 425 Treatment Research Institute Booth Number: 525 USDTL Booth Number: 312 Veterans Crisis Line Booth Number: 318 Wendell s Inc. Booth Number: 321 131

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Exhibitor Listing ACT (Advanced Computer Technologies) Booth: 414 ACT currently provides DCCM, a web-based drug court case management solution, to over 300 courts. They also provide Paracelsus, a drug testing laboratory information system, in over 17 different states. Contact: Greg Brannon, Vice President 101 Market Place, Suite 200 Montgomery, AL 36117 gregb@actinnovations.com Tel: 334-262-6882 Fax: 334-262-4707 www.actinnovations.com Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Booth: 327 A fellowship of sober alcoholics; no dues or fees, self-supporting, no outside funds; unaffiliated; primary purpose: carry the A.A. message to alcoholic who still suffers. Contact: Racy Joseph, Coordinator 475 Riverside Drive New York, NY 10115 cpc@aa.org Tel: 212-870-3107 Fax: 212-870-3003 www.aa.org Alkermes, Inc. Booth: 539 For more information about Alkermes and its innovative medicines designed to help people living with serious, chronic diseases, including addiction disorders, please visit www.alkermes.com Contact: Andrew Deslaurier, Product Manager 852 Winter Street Waltham, MA 02451 andrew.deslaurier@alkermes.com Tel: 781-609-6291 www.alkermes.com 132 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE American Court & Drug Testing Services Booth: 506 American Court Services put the element of surprise back in random testing with i-samson.net, and this year introduces i-ontrack.net, a companion web application for specialized dockets to objectively evaluate and track incentives and sanctions. Contact: William Parker, President 200 S. Columbus Street Lancaster, OH 43130 william.parker@americancourtservices.com Tel: 740-687-6156 Fax: 866-741-8523 www.americancourtservices.com American Drug Screening Corporation Booth: 424 American Drug Screen Corporation offers top of the line DOA testing products. Our cutting edge drug screen products are reliable and affordable. We are the nation s leading rapid drug screen distributor. Contact: Minerva Melendez, Account Executive 5358 Irwindale Avenue Irwindale, CA 91706 mmelendez@ads-corp.net Tel: 626-941-0100 Fax: 626-443-8065 www.ads-corp.ent American Screening Corporation Booth: 307 A manufacturer of ONESCREEN and Reveal Multi-Panel Drug Tests, American Screening Corporation is the pioneer in the drug testing market. ASC is your first choice for quality CLIA Waived drug tests and excellent customer service. Contact: Ron Kilgarlin, CEO 7607 Fern Avenue, Suite 704 Shreveport, LA 71105 ron@americanscreeningcorp.com Tel: 318-798-3306 Fax: 318-798-3386 www.americanscreeningcorp.com

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Avertest Booth: 302 Avertest provides best-in-class, evidenced-based drug testing services, that include random schedule management, same gender collections, laboratory testing, expert testimony, test results analysis, and treatment court team training and consultation. Avertest provides much more than just a test. Contact: Jason Herzog, President 7202 Glen Forest Drive, Suit 302 Richmond, VA 23226 jherzog@avertest.com Tel: 804-767-8693 Fax: 804-767-8693 www.avertest.com BI Incorporated Booth: 400 BI provides a full continuum of offender monitoring technologies & community reentry services for parolees, probationers, pretrial defendants & illegal aliens involed in the U.S. Contact: Bob Murnock, Regional Sales Manager, East 6400 Lookout Road Boulder, CO 80301 rob.murnock@bi.com Tel: 303-218-1000 Fax: 303-218-1250 www.bi.com CAADAC Booth: 406 The largest AODA counseling certification organization in California, CAADAC s mission is unifying addictionfocused professionals interested in achieving excellence through the attainment of the highest levels of advocacy, competency and ethics. Contact: Warren Daniels, III, CFAAP Chair 3400 Bradshaw Road, Suite A5 Sacramento, CA 95827 mtownley@caadac.org Tel: 916-368-9412 Fax: 916-368-9424 www.caadac.org Call2Test Booth: 301 Randomized Drug Court call in service Contact: Ed Larson, President 7040 Avenida Encinas, Suite 104/391 Carlsbad, CA 92011 ed@call2test.com Tel: 760-822-6077 Fax: 858-777-5777 www.call2test.com CARF International Booth: 315 CARF is an international, independent, nonprofit accreditor of human services providers. Accreditation is provided through a consultative survey process conducted onsite by peer surveyors. Contact: Michael Johnson, Managing Director-Behavioral Health 6951 E. Southpoint Road Tucson, AZ 85756 mjohnson@carf.org Tel: 520-325-1044 Fax: 520-318-1129 www.carf.org Center for Court Innovation Booth: 625 The Center for Court Innovation helps the justice system aid victims, reduce crime, strengthen neighborhoods, and improve public trust in justice. The Center combines action and reflection to spark innovation locally, nationally, and internationally. Contact: Valerie Raine, Director, Drug Court Programs 520 8th Avenue New York, NY 10018 rainev@courtinnovation.org Tel: 646-386-3100 Fax: 212-397-0985 www.courtinnovation.org 133

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Central Recovery Press Booth: 305 CRP is a progressive publishing company shedding light on an age-old problem addiction. We offer a diverse selection of titles focused on recovery, addiction treatment and behavioral health care topics. Contact: John Davis, Special Markets Sales Manager 3321 North Buffalo Drive, Suite 275 Las Vegas, NV 89129 jdavis@centralrecovery.com Tel: 702-868-5830 Fax: 702-868-5839 www.centralrecoverypress.com Children and Family Futures, Inc. Booth: 421 The mission of CFF is to improve the lives of children and families, particularly those affected by substance abuse disorders. CFF consults with government agencies and service providers to ensure that effective services are provided to families. Contact: Larisa Owen, KMD Program Director 4940 Irvine Blvd, Suite 202 Irvine, CA 92620 lowen@cffutures.org Tel: 714-505-3525 Fax: 714-505-3626 www.cffutures.org Cocaine Anonymous World Services Booth: 324 Cocaine Anonymous is a fellowship of men & women who share their experience, strength and hope with each other that they may solve their common problem and help others recover from their addiction to cocaine and all other mind altering substances. Contact: Program Director 21720 S. Wilmington Avenue, Suite 304 Long Beach, CA 908010 cawso@ca.org Tel: 310-559-5833 Fax: 310-559-2554 www.ca.org Correctional Counseling, Inc. Booth: 402 CCI offers training and treatment materials for Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT ), a cognitive skills model, in substance abuse, relapse prevention, anger management, domestic violence, codependence and other related areas. Contact: Lacy Kennedy, Office Manager 2028 Exeter Road Germantown, TN 38118 ccimrt@aol.com Tel: 901-360-1564 Fax: 901-757-1995 www.ccimrt.com CourtView Justice Solutions Booth: 415 CourtView Justice Solutions engineers, installs and supports justice information systems. Courts, prosecuting attorneys, public defenders, probation offices, detention operators and law enforcement agencies enhance their operations and improve public safety. Contact: Steve Bearden, Account Executive 5399 Lauby Road, NW North Canton, OH 44720 steve.bearden@courtview.com Tel: 330-470-0618 Fax: 330-494-2483 www.courtview.com CRC Health Group Booth: 413 CRC Health Group offers the most comprehensive network of behavioral health, addiction, weight management and therapeutic education services in the nation. For over three decades, CRC programs have helped individuals reclaim and enrich their lives. Contact: Melissa Preshaw, Director of Community Relations 20400 Stevens Creek Blvd, 6th Floor Cupertino, CA 95014 mpreshaw@crchealth.com Tel: 408-367-2185 www.crchealth.com 134 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Drug Testing Program Management, Inc. Booth: 416 DTPM provides any type drug testing product for drug courts, treatment centers, clinics and others needing drug testing solutions. Sets up laboratories, designs programs and sells point of care devices. Contact: Gene Cleckler, Executive Director 3022 Greenhill Blvd, NW Fort Payne, AL 35967 genec@dtpm.ws Tel: 256-845-1261 Fax: 256-845-8813 www.dtpm.ws elab Solutions Booth: 401 We work with you to customize a testing program that is right for staff, patients and successful clinic operations. Contact: Colin Rogers, Vice President of Sales 5009 Roswell Road Sandy Springs, GA 30342 colin.rogers@elabsolutions.com Tel: 770-988-9173 Fax: 770-988-9943 www.elabsolutions.com Emerge Monitoring Inc Booth: 300 Emerge is a provider of innovative mobile alcohol solutions with real-time reporting and immediate identification. Emerge also provides technology for offender tracking while offering customized value added services. Contact: Derek Cassell, Executive Vice President 5024 Ace Lane, Suite 112 Naperville, IL 60565 info@emergemonitoring.com Tel: 877-260-2010 Fax: 630-428-2748 www.emergemonitoring.com Immunalysis Booth: 329 Contact: Kathy Miller, VP Sales & Marketing 829 Towne Center Drive Pomona, CA 91767 kmiller@immunalysis.com Tel: 909-482-0840 Fax: 909-482-0850 www.immunalysis.com Integrated Management Solutions Booth: 404 ims provides integrated data and case management solutions for toxicology laboratories, specialty courts and therapeutic entities. For 10 years, ims has provided this technology to 440 sites throughout the US. Contact: Jim Northway Sales and Installation Manager 4900 Bradford Drive, NW Huntsville, AL 35805 jim.northway@ims-dynetics.com Tel: 256-713-5232 Fax: 256-864-9994 www.ims-dynetics.com Intoximeters Inc. Booth: 320 Breath Alcohol Testing Instruments, Supplies, and Training Contact: Mark Gilmer, Manager, State Federal Law Enforcement, N America/Caribbean 2081 Craig Road St. Louis, MO 63146 sales@intox.com Tel: 314-429-4000 Fax: 314-429-4170 www.intox.com 135

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Marijuana Anonymous Booth: 326 12-Step program for men and women who wish to stay free of marijuana and help others acheive the same freedom. Contact: Tom White, Office Manager 2106 Grant Avenue, #1 Redondo Beach, CA 90278 office@marijuana-anonymous.org Tel: 971-255-9020 Fax: 971-255-9020 www.marijuana-anonymous.org Medical Disposables Corp Booth: 419 Medical Disposables is a privately own Bio Medical Technology company who supplies the most advanced line of professional CLIA Waived onsite drug tests and infectious disease test to professionals in the United States and worldwide. Contact: Ralph Hernandez, CEO 4855 Distribution Court, Suite 11 Orlando, FL 32822 ralph@medicaldisposables.us Tel: 407-574-6266 Fax: 866-513-6660 www.medicaldisposables.us MHS Inc Booth: 418 MHS is the publisher of many of the best assessments in public safety. The public safety division features world renowned assessments such as the LSI-R assessments, M-PULSE, Hare psychopathy assessments, and the CAFAS and JIFF. This suite of assessments provides users the best science available to inform difficult decisions. Contact: Caroline Ely, Business Consultant 3770 Victoria Park Avenue Toronto, Ontario M2H3M6 caroline.ely@mhs.com Tel: 800-456-3003 Fax: 416-492-3343 www.mhs.com/safety NACoA-Celebrating Families! Booth: 524 NACoA s Celebrating Families!, an evidence-based, trauma-informed, intergenerational family skills building curriculum, supports and helps maintain recovery, improve the health and well-being of children and family members, and increase family reunification. Contact: Rosemary Tisch, Celebrating Families! Developer 10920 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 100 Kensington, MD 20895 rstisch@aol.com Tel: 650-799-3047 Fax: 301-468-0987 www.nacoa.org Narcotics Anonymous World Services Booth: 325 Narcotics Anonymous is a global, multilingual, multicultural mutual-support fellowship. We have over 62,000 meetings in 129 countries and 76 languages. Our recovery literature is printed in 42 languages. Contact: Jane Nickels, Public Relations Manager 19737 Nordhoff Place Chatsworth, CA 91311 pr@na.org Tel: 818-773-9999 Fax: 818-700-0700 www.na.org National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare (NCSACW) Booth: 521 The National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare s mission is to improve systems and practice for families with substance use disorders who are involved in the child welfare system. Services include technical assistance, consultation and training to local, state and tribal agencies. Training resources include no-cost, web-based tutorials eligible for Continuing Education Units geared to child welfare, substance use treatment, and dependency court professionals. 136 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Contact: Alexis Balkey, Program Associate 25371 Commercentre Drive, Suite 140 Lake Forest, CA 92630 abalkey@cffutures.org Tel: 714-505-3525 Fax: 714-505-3626 www.ncsacw.samhsa.gov National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Booth: 520 The NCJFCJ serves an estimated 30,000 professionals in the juvenile and family justice system including judges, referees, commissioners, court masters and administrators, social and mental health workers, police, and probation officers. Contact: Wendy Schiller, Project Coordinator 1041 North Virginia Street, 3rd Floor Reno, NV 89503 wschiller@ncjfcj.org Tel: 775-784-1661 Fax: 775-784-6628 www.ncjfcj.org Norchem Booth: 510 Norchem is an innovative, technology driven Drug Testing Laboratory with the industry leading turn around times specializing in the Drug Court and Criminal Justice arena. Contact: Jefferson Warner, National Sales Rep P.O. Box 70,000 Flagstaff, AZ 86003 jeffw@norchemlab.com Tel: 858-442-4104 Fax: 800-813-2404 www.norchemlab.com OraSure Technologies, Inc. Booth: 428 OraSure Technologies is the pioneer of oral fluid drug testing, manufactures the Intercept Oral Fluid Drug Test System collection device and diagnostic immunoassays. Contact: Kelly Lauer, Executive Assistant 220 East First Street Bethlehem, PA 18015 klauer@orasure.com www.orasure.com Oxford House, Inc. Booth: 314 Oxford House Inc., a service organization that serves as the umbrella organization for the network of Oxford Houses, is dedicated to establishing and maintaining disciplined self-help housing that supports long-term recovery from alcoholism, drug addiction and co-occurring mental illness. Contact: Kathleen Gibson, Chief Operating Officer 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 300 Silver Spring, MD 20910 kathleen.gibson@oxfordhouse.org Tel: 301-587-2910 www.oxfordhouse.org Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. Booth: 526 Preferred Family Healthcare is a dynamic and caring comprehensive behavioral health non-profit organization established in 1979 providing substance abuse treatment/prevention and mental health services. We serve adolescent and adult clients and their families in urban, rural, and frontier communities. Contact: Kathy Hoppe, Vice President of Treatment Services 1101 Jamison Street Kirksville, MO 63501 khoppe@pfh.org Tel: 314-322-5644 Fax: 314-584-1008 www.pfh.org 137

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court Premier Biotech Inc. Booth: 328 Leading USA manufacturer of drug testing diagnostics and innovative laboratory testing services. Introducing first, and only instant (Point-of-Care) test for EtG. Contact: Casey Michalik, Vice President- Sales & Marketing 7516 80th St S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 cmichalik@premierbiotech.com Tel: 952-949-0729 Fax: 888-600-1189 www.premierbiotech.com Professional Online Testing Solutions, Inc. Booth: 310 Provides valid, reliable, and accurate state-of-the-art assessments. Our tests are used in adult and juvenile courts, substance abuse clinics, diversion programs, corrections (prisons), probation departments, domestic violence treatment and clinical settings. Contact: Lisa Degiorgio, Senior Research Analyst PO Box 32974 Phoenix, AZ 85064-2974 lisa@bdsltd.com Tel: 800 231-2401 Fax: 602-266-8227 www.online-testing.com Randox Booth: 512 Randox Toxicology deliver innovative solutions for fast and accurate drug detection. The primary manufacturer of Biochip Array Analysers, HEIA s, ELISA s, Quality Control Material and Antibodies for forensic and clinical toxicology. Contact: Donald Chung, Business Development Executive 30 Cherryvalley Road Crumlin, County Antrim BT29 4QN donald.chung@randoxtoxicology.com Tel: 44-(0)28 9442-2413 Fax: 44-(0)28 9445-2912 www.randoxtoxicology.com SCRAM of California Booth: 528 SCRAM of California and Nevada is the leader in full service comprehensive monitoring and testing programs utilizing SCRAM systems technologies, such as continuous alcohol monitoring, continuous drug testing, point in time alcohol monitoring, location monitoring, and home detention or curfew compliance. SCRAM of CA specializes in servicing specialty court programs at the local level such as Drug Courts, DUI courts, Veteran Treatment courts, Domestic Violence courts, and Re-Entry courts. Contact: Aaron Fleischer, President 402 West Broadway Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92101 afleisher@scramca.com Tel: 619-997-3429 Fax: 877-737-9009 www.scramca.com SCRAM Systems Booth: 427 SCRAM Systems is the world s leading manufacturer and provider of alcohol and location monitoring technologies that includes SCRAM Continuous Alcohol Monitoring, SCRAM Remote Breath, SCRAM GPS, and SCRAM House Arrest. Contact: Jennifer Mill, Marketing Manager 1241 W. Mineral Avenue Littleton, CO 80120 jmill@alcoholmonitoring.com Tel: 303-791-7828 Fax: 303-791-4262 www.alcoholmonitoring.com Sentinel Offender Services Booth: 417 Sentinel Offender Services is one of the nation s leading providers of offender management services. Since beginning operations in 1993, the company has focused on providing products and services that effectively aid correctional agencies efforts to manage their offender populations. 138 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Contact: Alan Velasquez, Vice President 201 Technology Dr. Irvine, CA 92618 avelasquez@sentrak.com Tel: 949-453-1550 Fax: 949-709-4393 www.sentineloffenderservices.com Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Booth: 405 Contact: Kimberly Blake, Product Manager, Syva 1717 Deerfield Road Deerfield, IL 60015 kimberly.m.blake@siemens.com Tel: 847-267-5300 Fax: 847-236-7101 www.siemens.com Smart Start, Inc. Booth: 420 Leader in alcohol monitoring with its ignition interlock and IN-HOM alcohol testing devices and its SmarTox drug testing products and services. It provides fully integrated services encompassing design, manufacturing, installation, customer service, monitoring and administrative support. Contact: Jacquie Sheehey, Franchise Director 500 East Dallas Road Grapevine, TX 76051 Jacqueline.Sheehey@smartstartinc.com Tel: 800-880-3394 Fax: 972-915-0562 www.smartstartinc.com SoberLink, Inc Booth: 303 SOBERLINK, Inc. develops leading edge technology to streamline and automate the remote alcohol monitoring process. Contact: Andy Rothman, VP of Sales and Marketing 10073 Valley View, #146 Cypress, CA 90630 ar@soberlink.net Tel: 714-975-7201 Fax: 310-388-5605 www.soberlink.net Sovereign Health Group Booth: 311 Sovereign Health Group is a leading addictions & behavioral healthcare organization offering residential treatment programs for Detoxification, Addictions, Dual Diagnosis and Mental Health conditions for adults and adolescents. We are Dually Licensed for substance abuse and mental health as well as Joint Commission accredited offering the highest standards for excellent patient care. Our programs offer evidence based treatment modalities, individualized treatment plans and therapy, and comprehensive and holistic programming. We accept and direct bill most PPO insurances for most of our programs. Visit our website today at www.sovcal.com Contact: Marissa Maldonado, Director of Business Development & Admissions 1211, Puerta Del Sol San Clemente, CA 92673 m.maldonado@sovhealth.com Tel: 949-369-1300 Fax: 949-276-5183 www.sovcal.com StreeTime Technologies Booth: 328 SleepTime is a wrist worn unit to continuously monitor for Alcohol and other Drug abuse. The PassPoint kiosk automates drug and alcohol screening with a one minute scan for current and recent impairment. Contact: John Diamond, Vice President of Sales 1127 Sport Hill Road Easton, CT 06612 jcdiamond@streetimetechnologies.com Tel: 877-727-7764 Fax: 615-261-9332 www.streetimetechnologies.com 139

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court TestDay Corporation Booth: 504 TestDay is a cloud-based random Scheduling and Interactive Voice Call-in system. It provides Drug Courts superior client control and test result and compliance reporting. Easy integration into your existing workflow. Contact Scott Farrell, President 505 W. McDowell Rd Phoenix, AZ 85003 Tel: 602-241-9000 Fax: 602-252-9355 sfarrell@testdaylite.com www.testdaylite.com The Change Companies Booth: 411 TCC is a training, consulting, publishing and multimedia company with an expertise in behavioral change, developing resources to support providers/practitioners in delivering evidence-based solutions. Contact: Mike Judnick, Vice President of Justice Services 5221 Sigstrom Dr Carson City, NV 89706 mjudnick@changecompanies.net Tel: 888-889-8866 Fax: 775-885-0643 www.changecompanies.net The National Judicial College Booth: 316 The National Judicial College is the nation s leading provider of judicial education. NJC s mission is the education-innovation-and advancing justice through judicial education. Contact: Melody Luetkehans, Program Attorney The National Judicial College Judicial College Bldg., MS 358 Reno, NV 89557 melody@judges.org Tel: 775-848-7873 Tel: 775-784-1253 www.judges.org The SASSI Booth: 511 The SASSI Institute is the developer, publisher, and distributor of substance use measures that help human service practitioners promote early intervention and treatment of substance use disorders. Contact: Regina Forest, SASSI Trainer 201 Camelot Lane Springville, IN 47462 reginaforest@yahoo.com Tel: 800-726-0526 Fax: 800-546-7995 www.sassi.com Thermo Fisher Scientific Booth: 410 Thermo Fisher Scientific supplies innovative quality products for drugs of abuse screening and offers system solutions with our MGC240 Bench top analyzer to meet your testing challenges. These assays can be used on a variety of clinical chemistry analyzers. Our MGC240 also provided a data management tool for keeping track of participant s on-going information. Contact: Kathy Ruzich, Director, Marketing Communications 46360 Fremont Boulevard Fremont, CA 94538 kathy.ruzich@thermofisher.com Tel: 800-626-0690, ext. 5157 Fax: 510-979-5357 www.thermo.com/diagnostics Total Court Services Booth: 425 Total Court Services provides electronic, alcohol and drug monitoring services for drug courts and other agencies. These programs are either offender pay or self-run programs that are designed to their needs. Contact: Rob Hawkins, Owner 612 E. Harrison Avenue Royal Oak, MI 48067 robh@totalcourtservices.com Tel: 888-889-6989 Fax: 877-475-6535 www.totalcourtservices.com 140 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Treatment Research Institute Booth: 525 Treatment Research Institute (TRI) is a nonprofit research and development organization offering its web-based RANT Suite: evidence-based, sciencederived court tools to improve placement, monitoring, evaluation and outcomes for substance-involved offenders. Contact: Meghan Love, Senior Program Manager 600 Public Ledger Building 150 S. Independence Mall West Philadelphia, PA 19106 mlove@tresearch.org Tel: 215-399-0980 ext. 184 Fax: 215-399-0987 www.tresearch.org USDTL Booth: 312 USDTL is a leader in forensic toxicology. The first lab to test for exposure in children s hair, USDTL leads the development of objective direct biomarker assays to effectively use bloodspot, hair and nail specimens to diagnose drug and alcohol misuse up to 3 months before collection. Contact: Nancy Parra, Marketing Communications Manager 1700 South Mount Prospect Road Des Plaines, IL 60018 nancy.parra@usdtl.com Tel: 847-493-8881 Fax: 847-375-0775 www.usdtl.com Veterans Crisis Line Booth: 318 The Veterans Crisis Line connects Veterans in crisis and their families and friends with qualified, caring Department of Veterans Affairs responders through a confidential toll-free hotline, online chat, or text. Contact: www.veteranscrisisline.net Wendell s Inc. Booth: 321 Wendell s Inc. is the manufacture of Recovery and Drug Court medallion. The medallions are used as incentives/rewards for completing each phase of the Drug Court as well giving at Graduation. Contact: Mark Jarl, Sales Manager 6601 Bunker Lake Blvd, NW Ramsey, MN 55303 mjarl@wendellsinc.com Tel: 763-576-8200 Fax: 763-576-0995 www.wendellsinc.com 141

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Anaheim Convention Center LEVEL 1 Drug Court Expo Hall D Hall C Hall B Hall A Arena LEVEL 2 143

TM Dual, independent biometric technology for immediate user identification/confirmation MORE THAN JUST A TEST Avertest is the leading provider of evidence-based drug testing services designed to reduce recidivism. Immediate CDMA reporting and confirmation of user identity Meets or exceeds Department of Transportation standards Easy to utilize, transport and ship Military grade 256-bit encryption for data communications GPS location fix for every test, positive or negative Reporting center software provides reports in MS Word, Excel, and PDF formats Multiple testing capabilities: scheduled, on-demand, random, self-initiated Introducing The Emerge R.A.D.A.R. Real-time Alcohol Detection and Recognition system. The R.A.D.A.R. system combines two independent identity confirmation technologies, real-time GPS location and pinpoint-accurate alcohol detection in our proprietary technology. No one sneaks under the R.A.D.A.R. TM TM No one sneaks under the R.A.D.A.R. No one sneaks under the R.A.D.A.R. Minimum 96-hour battery life EME7636-RADAR-Product-Sheet-update7043.indd 1 emergemonitoring.com 7/31/13 1:43 PM EME7636-RADAR-Product-Sheet-update7043.indd 1 7/31/13 1:43 PM Web-enabled software platform www.avertest.com (866) 680-3106 EME 7636 0713 EME7636-RADAR-Product-Sheet-update7043.indd 2 7/31/13 1:43 PM web-based staffing reports analytics fast easy results 888.549.9880 www.actinnovations.com

Visit booth 539 vivitrol.com/hcp Alkermes and VIVITROL are registered trademarks of Alkermes, Inc. 2014 Alkermes, Inc. All rights reserved VIV-001505 Printed in U.S.A. vivitrol.com

Your Alcohol Clients Aren t All Alike. That s Why You Need Risk-Appropriate OPTIONS in Alcohol Monitoring Lower Level Alcohol Misuse Higher Level Alcohol Dependence and Addiction LOWER RISK SCRAM Remote Breath 1st time DUI Public order offenses Low BAC at time of arrest Earns reduced monitoring through program compliance HIGHER RISK SCRAM Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Repeat/Hardcore Drunk Drivers Domestic violence High BAC at time of arrest Requires more intensive monitoring after a violation Want to learn more about the newest OPTION in alcohol monitoring for your lower-risk/lower-need clients? Come to Booth 427/429 for more information on SCRAM Remote Breath 3 for 30 Demos, available for a limited time! www.scramsystems.com/3for30

A91DX-9171-A1-4A00. 2011 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. All Rights Reserved. EMIT, Syva and all associated marks are trademarks of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. Recovery starts with a drug test. With answers from Siemens, drug courts can stop cycles of drug abuse. www.usa.siemens.com/drugtesting Drug court programs have proven remarkably effective at stopping substance abuse and diverting criminal activity to treatment and recovery. Seventy-five percent of graduates remain arrest free. And for every dollar invested, more than three dollars are saved by the justice system. The Siemens Syva EMIT Drug Testing Solution supports drug courts by offering urine drug screening that s fast, accurate, and defensible in court. In fact, the Syva EMIT assay has the only citation as a defensible technology in a Supreme Court ruling. 1 Today, we re not just helping drug courts be more effective we re empowering them to become more self-sufficient. On-site testing combined with data management and reporting eliminates manual, subjective testing methods to improve workflow and efficiency. Instant uploads of test results save time and prevent costly transcription errors. At Siemens, we ve seen firsthand how drug tests that stand up in court help people stand proud. Visit our website at www.usa.siemens.com/drugtesting to learn how Siemens can support a successful drug rehabilitation program. Answers for life. 1. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 109 S. Ct. 1384 (1989).

Now Available from BI Incorporated The SOBERLINK SL2 helps offenders stay sober in the community. The SL2 is a sleek, cutting-edge, portable alcohol monitoring device that utilizes cellular and GPS technology. No ankle monitors to wear, no plugging into the wall just accurate results every time to hold court participants accountable while they proceed through critical treatment. Count on the SL2 s reliability and convenience make it a designated device when sobriety is on the line. Call 800.876.1105 to add the SL2 as a trusted monitoring option. We re In It Together When it comes to solving community problems no person, agency, or court can go it alone; single-threaded solutions just don t get the job done. Combining the strengths of two leading technologies, we re proud to deliver JWorks and COMPAS. From Risk/Needs Assessment through complete Case Management and Monitoring, our solutions are thorough, reliable, efficient, effective, affordable, and interwoven. CONSULTING & EDUCATION RISK/NEEDS ASSESSMENT DYNAMIC CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT PROBLEM-SOLVING SOLUTIONS STOP BY BOOTH #415 AT THE NADCP ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM TO LEARN MORE COURTVIEW.COM NORTHPOINTEINC.COM

New screening solutions using Thermo Scientific CEDIA Oral Fluid Immunoassays. 2011 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. CEDIA is a registered trademark of Roche Diagnostics. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. Moving science forward Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific New Thermo Scientific CEDIA Oral Fluids Immunoassays are the newest tools available for drugs of abuse screening and monitoring. The observation of oral fluid collect is noninvasive, so the risk of adulterated samples is significantly minimized. Samples can also be collected during routine field visits or during regular check-ins. The CEDIA Oral Fluids immunoassays, calibrators and controls have FDA clearance and are based on the reputable CEDIA technology. These new immunoassays offer new options for testing amphetamines, cannabinoids (THC), cocaine, methamphetamines, opiates and PCP. For more information about these or other drugs of abuse testing products, from collection devices to confirmation tools, contact us be email at sales.diagnostics.com or call 1-800-232-3342 or visit our website at www.thermoscientific.com/diagnostics OralFluids NADCP Ad 2.indd 1 5/19/11 8:32 AM Your One Stop Drug Testing Solution Do you have all the resources to ensure you are effectively managing your client s drug tests? With our suite of products and services, elab takes the pain out of managing your client s drug test results. We work directly with you to customize a testing program that is just right for your staff, clients and of course, successful program operations. For more information, visit www.elabsolutions.com or call 866-990-ELAB (3522)

We improve the lives of children and families affected by substance related and addictive disorders. Drug Court Training and Technical Assistance Policy Development and Analysis Research and Evaluation (714) 505-3525 (866) 493-2758 contact_us@cffutures.org www.cffutures.org Integrated Management Solutions Proven Reliable Technology Systems THE ORAL FLUID DRUG TESTING LABORATORY Simple Fast Accurate Confirmed Results in 24-Hours or Less 866.492.2517 225 Parsons Street Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Connexis Cloud WinTOX 1-888-946-5227 www.ims-trident.com support@ims-trident.com K2 / SPICE Reagents Exclusively from for Chemistry Analyzers For Forensic Use Only K2 (Synthetic Cannabinoids-1): Targeted at major metabolites of JWH-018, JWH-073, AM-2201 C M Y CM MY K2 (Synthetic Cannabinoids-2): NEW Targeted at major metabolites of UR-144 and XLR11 www.immunalysis.com We are Toxicology. 2014 Immunalysis Corporation. All rights reserved. Immunalysis and Immunalysis logo are trademarks of Immunalysis Corporation. MKT-1062 Revision:A CY CMY K IN-HOM TM Device Ignition Interlock 1.800.880.3394 SmartStartInc.com Real Solutions for Real Problems Electronic and Alcohol Monitoring Services 888.889.6989 www.totalcourtservices.com

Choose evidence-based resources for veterans... Transitioning home Reestablishing relationships Treating substance use Improving mental health Learn more Visit booth # 411 The Coming Home Interactive Journaling series Robert J. Meyers, PhD, & William R. Miller, PhD Interactive Journaling is included in SAMHSA s NREPP. 888-889-8866 www.changecompanies.net OTI0125 0314 NADCP 1/4 pg ad_layout 1 3/7/14 9:35 AM Page 1

21st Annual Tr aining Conference WASHINGTON, DC JULY 27-30, 2015 See you in Washington NEXT YEAR!

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 Session Tables WEDNESDAY, MAY 28 9:00 P.M. 12:00 P.M. SB-1-213 C/D Alcohol Monitoring: Best Practices for Selecting the Right Tools to Fit Each Client s Risks and Needs SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS WEDNESDAY, MAY 28 2:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. SB-17-213 C/D Real World Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension) in Specialty Courts SB-2-207 C/D Effective Strategies in Juvenile Drug Court SB-3-202 A/B Case Management SB-4-209 A/B DWI Court Forum SB-5-204 B Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices SB-6-213 A/B Target Population: Best Practices SB-18-210 C/D Drug Testing: Best Practices SB-19-207 A/B Data, Evaluation, and Fidelity to the Model: Best Practices SB-20-209 A/B DWI Court Forum SB-21-204 B Incentives and Sanctions: Best Practices SB-22-202 A/B New Directions for Problem Solving Courts SB-7-201 C/D HEAT SB-8-205 A/B Ancillary Services: Best Practices SB-9-210 A/B America s Worst Drug Epidemic: How Did We Get Here and What Can We Do About It? SB-10-210 C/D Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Trauma and Substance Abuse But Were Afraid to Ask: Now You Can! SB-11-207 A/B Legal Issues in Adult Drug Court: Best Practices SB-12-204 A Historically Disadvantaged Groups: Best Practicest SB-13-203 A/B The Critical Role of the Team: Best Practices SB-14-212 A/B Co-Occurring Disorders: What Legal, Supervision, and Case Management Professionals Should Know SB-15-204 C Grant Information from a Panel of Federal Experts SB-16 - Room: 201 A/B Listening to Themes: Trauma-Informed Treatment SB-24-204 A Tribal Nations Forum SB-25-213 A/B Reentry Court on Steroids SB-26-204 C Mental Illness, Recovery, and Procedural Fairness: Challenges and New Directions for Treatment Courts SB-27-201 A/B Heroin Resurgence and Prescription Opiates: Critical Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment SB-28-205 A/B The Use of Medication Assisted Treatment: What Drug Court Professionals Need to Know SB-29-201 C/D HEAT SB-30-203 A/B Tested and Proven - Utilization of Recovery Support Specialists as a Key Engagement and Retention Strategy in FDC (and Beyond) SB-31-212 A/B Recovery Strategies in the Drug Court Environment SB-32-210 A/B Supervision 153

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court OPENING CEREMONY THURSDAY, MAY 29 8:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. Arena TRAINING TRACKS CONCURRENT WORKSHOP SESSIONS TRACKS SESSION A 10:30 A.M. 11:45 A.M. SESSION B 1:15 P.M. 2:30 P.M. THURSDAY, MAY 29 FRIDAY, MAY 30 SESSION C 2:45 P.M. 4:00 P.M. SESSION D 4:15 P.M. 5:30 P.M. SESSION E 10:00 A.M. 11:15 A.M. Track 1 A-1 201 A/B B-1 201 A/B C-1 201 A/B D-1 201 A/B E-1 201 A/B Ready, Set, Go! Implementing Your Drug Court Ten Key Components and the Research Building a Multi-Disciplinary Team Target Population The Brain on Drugs Data Collection and Evaluation: Where to Begin? Track 2 A-2 201 C B-2 201 C C-2 201 C D-2 201 C E-2 201 C Raising the Bar: Taking Family Dependency Treatment Courts to the Next Level Parents are Adults Too-- Implementing Adult Best Practices in Family Drug Courts: Bridging Opportunities for System Change and Program Fidelity Closed Doors or Welcome Mat? Opening the Way for Medically Assisted Treatment in FDCs New Ways of Serving Children in Family Drug Courts Case Studies from the Children Affected by Methamphetamines Grant Program So How Do You Know They are Ready? Key Considerations for Assessing Families in Recovery for Reunification The Grant is Over Now What? Refinancing and Redirection as Real Sustainability Planning for your FDC Track 3 A-3 201 D B-3 201 D C-3 201 D D-3 201 D E-3 201 D Juvenile Drug Courts: Building on Our Success Sixteen Strategies and Effective Practice in Juvenile Drug Courts Forming a Lasting Partnership Between the Courts and Treatment Economic Analysis of an Integrated Juvenile Treatment Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures Model: Methods and Results from Five Sites Preparing for Team Transition in a Juvenile Drug Court: Why is it so Important? Creating an Individualized Juvenile Drug Court Track 4 A-4 202 A/B B-4 202 A/B C-4 202 A/B D-4 202 A/B E-4 202 A/B Mental Health Courts: From Implementation to Operation Mental Health Courts A-Z Evaluating Your Mental Health Court Mental Health Courts How to Successfully Integrate Drug Court Evidence-Based Practices into your Mental Health Court Risk and Needs in Mental Health Courts Mental Health Courts: Unique Issues and Research Powered Solutions Track 5 A-5 203 A/B B-5 203 A/B C-5 203 A/B D-5 203 A/B Participants with Co-Occurring Disorders: Advanced Issues What Juvenile Drug Courts Need to Know About Providing Effective Services for Youth with Co-Occurring Disorders Review of NDCI s New Curriculum on Best Practices with Co-Occurring Populations Drug Court? Mental Health Court? Something Else?: Getting the Right People into the Right Programs New Developments in Supported Employment Track 6 A-6 204 A B-6 204 A C-6 204 A D-6 204 A E-6 204 A Ensuring Cultural Proficiency: More than Just Awareness Cultural Competency 101: An Introduction How to Effectively Work with Native Participants Real Men Wear Pink (for women only) From Silence to Trust Serving Asian American Families in Drug Court A Courageous Conversation: Addressing Race in Drug Courts 154 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 TRAINING TRACKS CONCURRENT WORKSHOP SESSIONS TRACKS SESSION A 10:30 A.M. 11:45 A.M. SESSION B 1:15 P.M. 2:30 P.M. THURSDAY, MAY 29 FRIDAY, MAY 30 SESSION C 2:45 P.M. 4:00 P.M. SESSION D 4:15 P.M. 5:30 P.M. SESSION E 10:00 A.M. 11:15 A.M. Track 7 A-7 204 C B-7 204 C C-7 204 C D-7 204 C E-7 204 C The Facts and Nothing But the Facts: Critical Role of Research Statewide Outcomes and Cost Benefit Analysis-Lessons Learned Visual Performance Feedback in Drug Court: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words Findings from the Evaluation of the Red Hook Community Justice Center: Implications for Other Problem Solving Courts NEW! Drug Court Peer Review: Creating a Learning Community - How Do You Do It? How Does It Work? Peer Experiences in Four States: Oregon, Colorado, Idaho and Georgia Accounting for the Role of Families in Drug Court Evaluations Track 8 A 8 204 B B 8 204 B C 8 204 B D 8 204 B E 8 204 B Keeping Ahead of the Curve: Drugs of Choice Cocaine Alcohol Designer Drugs Working with Methamphetamine Addicted Offenders Marijuana Track 9 A 9 207 C/D B 9 207 C/D C 9 207 C/D D 9 207 C/D E 9 207 C/D The Good, the Bad, and the Effective: Incentives and Sanctions Critical Role of Risk/Need in Building Incentives and Sanctions Fundamentals of Incentives and Sanctions in Adult Drug Court Incentives and Sanctions in Juvenile Drug Court Incentives and Sanctions in Family Dependency Treatment Court: Special Issues to Consider Behavior Modification and the Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider Track 10 A 10 206 A/B B 10 206 A/B C 10 206 A/B D 10 206 A/B E 10 206 A/B Supervision: The Challenges Faced by Probation and Law Enforcement Supervision to Support Recovery and Public Safety The Smoking Gun: The Role of Law Enforcement and Ethical Issues in a Drug Court Setting Assessing and Addressing Family Needs in Adult Drug Courts Traditional and Non-Traditional Benefits from Probation and Law Enforcement Officers CBT for LEOs Track 11 A 11 210 D B 11 210 D C 11 210 D D 11 210 D Working with the Latino Community Trauma Informed Approaches: A Judicial Perspective Border Towns: Special Issues to Consider for Drug Courts on the US/Mexican Border Immigration Issues Giving Latino Participants a Voice in Drug Court: Eliminating Racial Disparities in Outcomes Track 12 A 12 205 A/B B 12 205 A/B C 12 205 A/B D 12 205 A/B E 12 205 A/B African American Clients: Improving Services and Outcomes HEAT Update From the Needle to the Pen: Telling it Like it is! Addicted to Drugs or Addicted to the Lifestyle Black Trauma From Boyz to Men Enabling in the Black Community Track 13 A 13 208 A/B B 13 208 A/B C 13 208 A/B D 13 208 A/B E 13 208 A/B Trauma Implementing and Supporting Trauma-Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network New Directions in PTSD Definition and Treatment Secondary Trauma is Not Secondary in Importance: Supporting Staff Doing Trauma Informed Treatment Complex Trauma Healing Trauma: Strategies for Abused Women 155

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court TRAINING TRACKS CONCURRENT WORKSHOP SESSIONS TRACKS SESSION A 10:30 A.M. 11:45 A.M. SESSION B 1:15 P.M. 2:30 P.M. THURSDAY, MAY 29 FRIDAY, MAY 30 SESSION C 2:45 P.M. 4:00 P.M. SESSION D 4:15 P.M. 5:30 P.M. SESSION E 10:00 A.M. 11:15 A.M. Track 14 A-14 210 A/B B-14 210 A/B C-14 210 A/B Science and Technology San Diego Specialty Court Perspectives on the Use of VIVITROL (naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension) What s in Your Drug Screen? Alcohol Monitoring and Testing Technologies: A Primer for New Programs, a Refresher on Policies Track 15 A-15 209 A/B B-15 209 A/B C-15 209 A/B Science and Technology Is it Heroin or Prescription Drugs? 24/7 Alcohol Monitoring of Offenders Pretrial and Postrial Advances and New Skills in Case Interpretation and Sentencing Design for Problem-Solving Courts: Decision Support Technologies for Judges and Other Stakeholders Track 16 A-16 210 C B-16 210 C C-16 210 C D-16 210 C DWI Courts The Ten Guiding Principles of DWI Courts Impaired Driving Risk Assessment: What Practitioners Need to Know Strategies for Getting Law Enforcement on Board Marijuana and Driving Impairment Track 17 A-17 207 A/B B-17 207 A/B C-17 207 A/B D-17 207 A/B E-17 207 A/B Legal Issues In and Beyond Problem Solving Courts Procedural Justice: Improving Court Outcomes Through Enhanced Perceptions of Fairness Adoption & Safe Families Act: What Does it Mean for Family Drug Courts? Queens District Attorney s Office Embrace the 10 Key Components Leveraging National Health Reform to Reduce Recidivism & Build Recovery Addressing Seven Common Challenges Drug Courts Are Encountering Track 18 A-18 213 C/D B-18 213 C/D C-18 213 C/D D-18 213 C/D E-18 213 C/D Advanced Issues in Drug and Alcohol Treatment The New ASAM Criteria: Implications for Drug Courts and Treatment Providers Guiding System-Level Change: Developing a Comprehensive Plan for Integrating Innovative Programs into Drug Court Peer Recovery Support: Recovery Coaching a New Approach to Reducing Recidivism in Problem Solving Courts Building Effective Interventions for Young Adults in Adult Drug Courts Expand the Evidence Base: Routine Outcomes Monitoring in the Context of Community Reintegration Track 19 A-19 211 B B-19 211 B C-19 211 B D-19 211 B Learning from Native Traditions: Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Incorporating Native Culture and Tradition Native American Treatment and Clinical Strategies for Traveling the Wellness Road Separate Tracks in Healing to Wellness Courts Indian Country Legal Implications Track 20 A-20 212 A/B B-20 212 A/B C-20 212 A/B D-20 212 A/B E-20 212 A/B Legal and Ethical Issues in Problem-Solving Courts Five Ways to Wreck Your Career: Ethics for Treatment Providers The Zealous Advocate: Defining the Defense Counsel Role as it Applies to Best Practice Standards Guess What? You re a Family Court, Too (if your Clients have Children) Legal Issues and Practical Considerations When Working with Families in Drug Courts Collaborative Justice: The PD and the Prosecutor, An Unlikely Couple Ethical Considerations for Attorneys and Judges in Problem-Solving Courts 156 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE

NADCP Anaheim, CA 2014 TRAINING TRACKS CONCURRENT WORKSHOP SESSIONS TRACKS SESSION A 10:30 A.M. 11:45 A.M. SESSION B 1:15 P.M. 2:30 P.M. THURSDAY, MAY 29 FRIDAY, MAY 30 SESSION C 2:45 P.M. 4:00 P.M. SESSION D 4:15 P.M. 5:30 P.M. SESSION E 10:00 A.M. 11:15 A.M. Track 21 A-21 213 B B-21 213 B C-21 213 B D-21 213 B E-21 213 B Risk/Need and Proper Placement Incorporating Criminogenic Risks/Needs, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Needs to Reduce Recidivism and Promote Recovery Closing a Service Gap: A Juvenile Drug Court Model to Serve Low to Moderate Risk, High Needs The RNR Program Tool for Adults: Achieving Better Outcomes Through Quality Programming An Accelerated Track for Low Risk/Low Need Offenders Statewide Implementation of the RANT in Missouri Track 22 A-22 213 A B-22 213 A C-22 213 A D-22 213 A E-22 213 A Taking Your Drug Court to the Next Level Marketing Your Drug Court to Local Officials Using Treatment Mapping to Maximize Community Treatment Resources and Reduce Gaps in Services for Offenders From Good to Great: Using Process and Outcome Data to Support Best Practice and Improve Outcomes New Jersey s Drug Court: Making a Difference Implementing an Education Program in Your Drug Court Track 23 A-23 211 A B-23 211 A C-23 211 A D-23 211 A E-23 211 A Spanish Los Mejor Estándares de Práctica e Investigación Condado de Queens, NY, Trbunal de Manjar Bajo la Influencia de Alcohol, 7 años de éxito probado Supervisión Communitaria El Rol de la Familia y su Impacto en el Proceso de Recuperación La Interseccion se Justicia Terapeutica Y Justicia Restaurativa FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE: A RESEARCH UPDATE FRIDAY, MAY 30 8:00 A.M. 9:30 A.M. Arena CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS FRIDAY, MAY 30 1:00 P.M. 2:15 P.M. CG-1 Arena CG-2 210 A/B CG -3 207 A/B CG-4 212 A/B Matching Service to Need: Exploring What High Risk/High Need Means for FDCs Innovations in Health Care and Criminal Justice Reform Reentry Ten Key Components Establishing the First Family Drug Treatment Court in Australia: Strategies, Processes, Outcomes CG-5 213 C/D CG-6 201 A/B CG-7 204 B CG-8 209 A/B Taking Drug Courts to Scale: Three Statewide Initiatives Implementing and Supporting Trauma- Informed Juvenile Justice Practices: Lessons Learned from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network Confidentiality What Judges and Other Practitioners Should Know About Treatment Services 157

Celebrating 25 Years of Drug Court SKILLS BUILDING WORKSHOPS FRIDAY, MAY 30 2:30 P.M. 5:30 P.M. SB-33 210 A/B SB-34 212 A/B SB-35 204 B Health Care Reform: Understanding and Navigating the Affordable Care Act Judicial Role and Ethics: Best Practices Substance Abuse Treatment: Best Practices SB-36 201 B SB-38 MARRIOTT-Grand Ballroom A/B SB-39 209 A/B The Trauma-Addiction Connection: Spirals of Recovery and Healing Drug Court Coordinator Forum! Challenges and Solutions Facing Rural Drug Courts SB-40 Arena The Fundamentals of Designer Drugs: A Primer SB-41 207 A/B Women in Drug Treatment Courts: Sexual Assault as the Underlying Trauma CLOSING CEREMONY SATURDAY, MAY 31 9:30 A.M. 11:30 A.M. Arena CONCURRENT GENERAL SESSIONS SATURDAY, MAY 31 11:45 A.M. 1:00 P.M. CG-9 209 A/B CG-10 201 A/B CG -11 207 A/B Understanding the Impact of the ACA - New Benefits and Challenges for Adult Drug Courts Leadership Role of the Drug Court Judge to Sustain the Drug Court Program Over the Long Term CG-12 Arena CG-13 212 A/B CG-16 201 C/D The Fundamentals of Urine Specimen Tampering CG-17 204 B Effective Cognitive-Behavioral Programming with MRT ADHD and its Impact on Our Jail and Treatment Populations Through a Child s Eyes: Understanding Addiction and Recovery Now That We Have Best Practice Standards, What Do We Do With Them? 158 NADCP 20th ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE