Electromagnetic Field Safety



Similar documents
Human Exposure Limits

RF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS

Selected Radio Frequency Exposure Limits

IEC TC106. Standards for the Assessment of Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 to 300 GHz

Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation

The Existing Public Exposure Standards Cindy Sage, MA Sage Associates, USA

Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands)

Effect of Metallic Materials on SAR

The field strength measurement and SAR experience related to human exposure in 110 MHz to 40 GHz

Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation onto Human Head with Variation of Holding Cheek and Tilt Positions

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (1999/519/EC)

Millennium Product Inc. Model: Cell Shield / Zorb

RICHARD T ELL ASSOCIATES,INC.

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Induced in Human Heads of Various Sizes When Using a Mobile Phone

Official Journal of the European Communities. (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COUNCIL


ARIB TR-T V Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations in different regions

RF safety at base station sites

Operating Frequency Selection for Loosely Coupled Wireless Power Transfer Systems with Respect to RF Emissions and RF Exposure Requirements

Wireless Broadband: Health & Safety Information

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the head of Tablet user's

THE ANSI/IEEE RF SAFETY STANDARD AND ITS RATIONALE. Om P. Gandhi and Gianluca Lazzi Department of Electrical Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Real-life Applications of ICNIRP Guidelines to Various Human EMF Exposure Issues

EMR Exposure Limits & Assessment Methods for Mobile Phone Communications. Lindsay Martin Manager, Non-Ionising Radiation Section

Technical limits of Human Exposure to RF from Cellular Base Stations and Handsets

How To Understand The Safety Of A Cell Phone (Cell Phone)

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Testing Report Twenty-Five Schools, Peel District School Board

Advanced Measurements of Microwave Oven Leakage

AN OVERVIEW OF STANDARDS AND REGULATION CONCERNING EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS

REVIEW OF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND HEALTH CONCERNS SANTA ANA. Base Station Telecommunication Transmitters UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Assessment of SAR in a human exposed to GSM electromagnetic fields

National Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Radio waves and health. Mobile communications

Exposures to radiofrequency fields from WiFi in New Zealand schools

Environmental Health and Safety

MEMORANDUM. Amy Kahler, Director of Customer Service and Marketing Mike McCurnin, P.E., Director of Water Production

SR Communications Tower Task Force Dr. Jeff Liva, Allen Cohen, Rebecca Rogers

Human exposure to RF

Radiation Protection Series

Human Exposure to Outdoor PLC System

RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION, (RFR): (RFR Information - Technology Newsletter, Full Version)

Radio-Frequency Exposure Levels from Smart Meters: A Case Study of One Model. February 2011

RF Exposure and Modular Equipment. Considerations

IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Standards (Active & Archive) Collection: VuSpec

Annex to the joint statement: Exposure of the general public to radiofrequency fields

ETSI TR V1.1.1 ( )

What the experts say: The consensus of scientific opinion

RWANDA UTILITIES REGULATORY AGENCY P.O BOX 7289 KIGALI,

Automated Meter Reading Frequently Asked Questions. What is AMR?

Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

For many years the general public

Thermal Effects of Mobile Phones

Occupational Exposure Assessment on an FM Mast: Electric Field and SAR Values

Effects of Cell Phone Radiation on the Head. BEE 4530 Computer-Aided Engineering: Applications to Biomedical Processes

SAR Simulation in Human Head Exposed to RF Signals and Safety Precautions

Harmful effects of 41 and 202 MHz radiations on some body parts and tissues

September 26, 2000 IMST GmbH Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Str. 2 D Kamp-Lintfort

sources in our environment i.e. Natural and man-made. The sun, earth and ionosphere are the natural source.

RF EXPOSURE PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION POLICIES FOR MOBILE AND PORTABLE DEVICES

Prudent Avoidance Policy on Siting Telecommunication Towers and Antennas

Body SAR and EU. B. Derat

Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

COMMON REGULATORY OBJECTIVES FOR WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) EQUIPMENT PART 2 SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF WLAN EQUIPMENT

3 Radio Waves and Human Body 8 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)... 8 SAR value of a mobile handset... 8 Radiation level by a mobile tower...

Mobile Phone Base-Station Audit

Interaction of Mobile Phone Waves with Tissues of Skeletal Muscles and Bone of Human Beings

OpenWay Radio Frequency FAQ

MUCH work has been reported on determining the specific

Exposure Assessment of a High-Resonance Wireless Power Transfer System under the Misaligned Condition

FDTD Computation of Sar Distributions in Human Head for Mobile Phones V.Purushothaman, N.Vignesh, S.Vijayakumar

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division Public Draft Review

Electromagnetic Radiation towards Adult Human Head from Handheld Mobile Phones

FDA Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Equipment Safety

Implications for SAR when. using a symmetric phantom exposed to RF radiation using the FDTD method. Loughborough University Institutional Repository

A study on specific absorption rate (SAR) due to non-ionizing radiation from wireless/telecommunication in Bangladesh

Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AND PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES #1

Measuring electric and magnetic fields

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Technical Guide for Interpretation and Compliance Assessment of Health Canada s Radiofrequency Exposure Guidelines

Electromagnetic Safety in Wireless Communications and Bio-Medical Technologies

Summary of ICES TC34 Activities

Regulation for wireless telecommunication equipment

Wireless Power Transfer

Clean, Green and Safe Management System

Guidelines on the assessment of installations against electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure limits

Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation

Human exposure assessment in the vicinity of 900 MHz GSM base station antenna

CALCULATION OF WHOLE-BODY SAR FROM A 100 MHz DIPOLE ANTENNA

Measurements of radiofrequency fields from a WEL Networks Smart Meter

Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 khz to 300 GHz

A Survey of Radiation Levels Associated with Mobile and Wireless Communication Technology Masts in Public Areas in Kaduna Metropolis


Mobile communication and health. Simply A1.

EMR - SAR Testing & Approval Requirements for Australia

Effect of GSM Phone Radiation on Human Pulse Rate (Heartbeat Rate)

EMR-300 Broadband RF Survey Meter

BLM Emerging Risks Team - Report on Mobile Phones/EMFs

Transcription:

SAR A Basic Restriction for Electromagnetic Field Safety David Baron, PE Consulting Engineer Electromagnetic Field Safety d.baron@ieee.org NOTE. CENAM is not responsible for the content of this document. For any question or comment, please contact the author.

Electromagnetic Fields A form of energy Non-ionizing i i Can be propagated through space Can interact with biological tissue (absorption)

Biological Effects Biological Effects Below approximately 100 khz effects focus on induced current density and electro-stimulation of cells. From 100 khz to 3 GHz bulk tissue absorption is the primary mechanism. Above about 3 GHz, heating of superficial tissues (body surfaces) become more important that t body absorption..

Biological Effects Biological Effects Below approximately 100 khz effects focus on induced current density and electro-stimulation of cells. From 100 khz to 3 GHz bulk tissue absorption is the primary mechanism. Above about 3 GHz, heating of superficial tissues (body surfaces) become more important that t body absorption.

Basic Restrictions - Definitions IEEE C95.1: Exposure restrictions that are based on established adverse health effects that incorporate appropriate p safety factors and are expressed in terms of: In Situ electric field (3 khz to 5 MHz) Specific absorption rate (100 khz to 3 GHz) Incident power density (3 GHz to 300 GHz) ICNIRP: Restrictions that are based directly on established health effects

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Units of Watts/kg Maximum allowable SAR empirically determined to be 4 W/kg Safety factor (10X) added 0.4 W/kg /g Basis for determination of MPE (maximum permissible exposure) fields Variation with penetration depth Variation with frequency (body resonance)

Field Penetration Depth in muscle tissue 10000 1000 Pe enetration Depth (mm) 100 10 3 GHz 5.8 mm 1 0.1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Frequency (MHz)

SAR vs. Frequency

Typical Safety Guideline 10,000,000 ICNIRP Electric Field Lim its (Occupational) Pl lane Wave Pow er Density (W/m2 2) 1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Frequency (MHz)

Standards Driven IEEE C95.1-2005 ICNIRP National Standards: d ACGIH FCC US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Mexico, Canada, UK

Reference Levels - Occupational

Reference Levels General Public

Field Strength SAR Field Strength Limits Maximum Permissible Exposures (MPEs) Reference Levels Empirical testing to determine MPE Exposure variables Conservative MPE values Exceeding MPE values does not assure that SAR limits are exceeded

Exposure Monitoring Methods Eti Estimating SAR with ithidi Indirect tmeasurements Electric Fields Magnetic Fields Induced Currents Direct SAR Measurement Methods Simulated Exposure Environment

1 MHz 50,000 watts Field Measurements

Whole-Body Averaging Exposure limits are based on unperturbed fields Replacing the subject with a surrogate yields more accuracy Dielectric Stickman used to simulate subject Use as guide for wholebody average reading

Whole-Body Averaging Replacing the subject with a surrogate yields more accuracy Dielectric Stickman used to simulate subject Multiple data points are recorded over the body area. Use as guide for whole-body body average reading

Spatial Averaging Example Series of 10 measurements Spaced over subject s body Average power density (square of field values) Compare to limits it in standard Head shoulder chest belly groin thigh knee calf ankle foot 0 20 40 60 80 100 Field Strength (V/m)

Calculating Spatial Average Exposure Measure field data points Square field values and average Compare average value to limits in standard Field Location Strength FSU 2 (V/m) 1 foot 22 484 2 ankle 34 1156 3 calf 47 2209 4 knee 58 3364 5 thigh 69 4761 6 groin 75 5625 7 belly 81 6561 8 chest 75 5625 9 shoulder 66 4356 10 Head 58 3364 Average 61.2 3751

High Power 100 MHz Application 100 MHz 50,000 watts x 8 antennas

Multiple RF Sources

Broad Range of Field Intensities Wide dynamic range required

1000 Broadcast Tower Intensity (V V/m) 100 Observed Field 10 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance from base (m)

Frequency Dependence 10,000,000 ICNIRP Electric Field Limits (Occupational) Plane Wave Pow er De ns ity (W/m 2) 1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 0.000001000001 0.0000100001 0.00010001 0.001001 001 0.01 01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Frequency (MHz)

Occupational Exposure Guidelines 61.4 V/m [ 10 Watts/m 2 ] at 100 MHz Time averaged exposure (6 Minutes)

1000 Broadcast Tower Intensity (V V/m) 100 Observed Field 10 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance from base (m)

Time-Averaged Personnel Exposure Six-minute Moving Average Exposure 1000 4.0 Instantaneous t Field 6 Min Avg 3.5 3.0 (V/m) Electric Field 100 10 2.5 2.0 1.5 6 Min Avg (mw W/cm2) 1.0 05 0.5 1 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time (seconds)

Exposure Monitoring Methods Eti Estimating SAR with ithidi Indirect tmeasurements Electric Fields Magnetic Fields Induced Currents Direct SAR Measurement Methods Simulated Exposure Environment

Induced Currents Currents induced in subject s body by RF electric fields Absorbed energy can be greater than that predicted by field measurements

Induced Current During Heating Cycle 180 160 140 nt (milliampere es) 120 100 Induced Curre 80 60 40 20 0-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (seconds)

Average Induced Current 160 140 Induced Curre ent (milliampere es) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (Seconds)

Calculating SAR from Induced Current amperes per square meter watts per kilogram

RMS induced and contact current limits for continuous sinusoidal waveforms, f = 100 khz to 110 MHz Condition Action Level a (ma) Persons in Controlled Environments (ma) Both feet 90 200 Each foot 45 100 Contact, grasp b - 100 Contact, touch 16.7 50 NOTE 1 Limits apply to current flowing between the body and a grounded object that may be contacted by the person. NOTE 2 The averaging time for determination of compliance is 6 minutes. a MPE for the general public in absence of an RF safety program. B Grasping contact limit pertains to controlled environments where personnel are trained to make grasping contact and to avoid touch contacts with conductive objects that present the possibility of painful contact

Average Induced Current 160 140 Induced Curre ent (milliampere es) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (Seconds)

Induced Current with Insulating Mat 140 Indu uced Curre ent (milliam mperes) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (Seconds)

Figure 2 Percent of electric field strength MPE below which the induced current through one foot, or the touch current, will meet the MPEs of Table 7 for the lower tier. Based on a body height of 1.75 m. 100 90 Percent of electric fie eld strength MPE 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Induced body current (one foot) Touch current 10 0 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency (MHz)

Exposure Monitoring Methods Safety requires compliance with basic restrictions Free-field measurements are one means of evaluating compliance Exposures in excess of standards (MPE values) do not necessarily mean that basic restrictions are exceeded It is possible to directly evaluate SAR, however, this evaluation is : Complex Expensive e Time-consuming

Exposure Monitoring Methods Eti Estimating SAR with ithidi Indirect tmeasurements Electric Fields Magnetic Fields Induced Currents Direct SAR Measurement Methods Simulated Exposure Environment

SAR Measurement Complex coupling between RF source and subject Use phantom subject to directly measure internal RF electric field strengths

SAR Electric Field Probes Small isotropic field probes to resolve the RF field distribution within the phantom head

Phantom head with standard shape (SAM) Filled with tissue equivalent fluid having know dielectric characteristics Measure electric field distribution within the phantom head Calculated SAR in accordance with the applicable standards (IEEE 1528, IEC 622209) 2 watts/kg averaged over an 10 grams of tissue

SAR Test Data Results SAR test results for mobile phones available on-line Government regulatory agencies Phone manufacturers US Federal Communications Commission FCC SAR limit: 1.6 watts per kilogram http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid/ http://docs.blackberry.com/en/smartphone_users/deli verables/5473/sib_8100_293846_11.pdf 11

Specific absorption rate data THIS WIRELESS DEVICE MODEL MEETS GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPOSURE TO RADIO WAVES. The BlackBerry device is a radio transmitter and receiver. It is designed and manufactured not to exceed the emission limits for exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of the U.S. Government, Industry Canada of the Canadian Government (IC), and recommended by The Council of the European Union. These limits are part of comprehensive guidelines and establish tblihpermitted levelsl of RF energy for the general population. lti The highest SAR value for each device model when tested for use at the ear is outlined below: Device BlackBerry Pearl TM 8100 smartphone 1.22/0.76 1 g / 10 g SAR (W/kg) The highest reported SAR value for this BlackBerry device when clipped on a belt, in a Research In Motion (RIM) approved holster equipped with an integrated belt clip, is outlined below. Device 1 g / 10 g SAR (W/kg) BlackBerry 8100 smartphone 1.52/0.98

In Summary Each means of determining compliance with EMF safety standards uses an estimator of the basic restriction Lack of compliance with an MPE (maximum permissible exposure) requirement does not necessarily mean non-compliance with the basic restriction It is important to choose the most practical field parameter to monitor when performing EMF safety evaluations. Select the proper instrumentation for your measurements

Dave Baron, PE Consulting Engineer Electromagnetic Field Safety Austin, Texas USA (512) 917-8346 d.baron@ieee.org

Gracias