Human Exposure Limits



Similar documents
EMR Exposure Limits & Assessment Methods for Mobile Phone Communications. Lindsay Martin Manager, Non-Ionising Radiation Section

Electromagnetic Field Safety

The field strength measurement and SAR experience related to human exposure in 110 MHz to 40 GHz

Selected Radio Frequency Exposure Limits

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (1999/519/EC)

Official Journal of the European Communities. (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COUNCIL

Wireless Broadband: Health & Safety Information

Technical limits of Human Exposure to RF from Cellular Base Stations and Handsets

RF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS

National Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Radiation Protection Series

EMR COMPLIANCE HOW TO ENSURE YOUR NATA ACCREDITED CONTRACTOR IS ABLE TO PROVIDE A NATA ENDORSED REPORT

Environmental Health and Safety

Real-life Applications of ICNIRP Guidelines to Various Human EMF Exposure Issues

AN OVERVIEW OF STANDARDS AND REGULATION CONCERNING EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Induced in Human Heads of Various Sizes When Using a Mobile Phone

The Existing Public Exposure Standards Cindy Sage, MA Sage Associates, USA

Mobile Phone Base-Station Audit

How To Know If You Are Safe To Use An Antenna (Wired) Or Wireless (Wireless)

Advanced Measurements of Microwave Oven Leakage

RF safety at base station sites

Thermal Effects of Mobile Phones

ARIB TR-T V Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) requirements and regulations in different regions

Millennium Product Inc. Model: Cell Shield / Zorb

RWANDA UTILITIES REGULATORY AGENCY P.O BOX 7289 KIGALI,

THE ANSI/IEEE RF SAFETY STANDARD AND ITS RATIONALE. Om P. Gandhi and Gianluca Lazzi Department of Electrical Engineering Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Electromagnetic Radiation Compatibility Survey and Safety Analysis around Mobile Base Transceiver Stations: Case Studies around Kathmandu Valley

IEC TC106. Standards for the Assessment of Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 to 300 GHz

Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AND PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES #1

RICHARD T ELL ASSOCIATES,INC.

Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation onto Human Head with Variation of Holding Cheek and Tilt Positions

Effect of Metallic Materials on SAR

ETSI TR V1.1.1 ( )

Human Exposure to Outdoor PLC System

HERMES: Human Exposure and Radiation Monitoring of Electromagnetic Sources.

Radio waves and health. Mobile communications

MUCH work has been reported on determining the specific

How To Understand The Safety Of A Cell Phone (Cell Phone)

Radio Frequency (RF) Exposure Compliance of Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands)

Operating Frequency Selection for Loosely Coupled Wireless Power Transfer Systems with Respect to RF Emissions and RF Exposure Requirements

BLM Emerging Risks Team - Report on Mobile Phones/EMFs

sources in our environment i.e. Natural and man-made. The sun, earth and ionosphere are the natural source.

RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION, (RFR): (RFR Information - Technology Newsletter, Full Version)


Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Effects of Cell Phone Radiation on the Head. BEE 4530 Computer-Aided Engineering: Applications to Biomedical Processes

Regulation for wireless telecommunication equipment

Body SAR and EU. B. Derat

3 Radio Waves and Human Body 8 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)... 8 SAR value of a mobile handset... 8 Radiation level by a mobile tower...

SR Communications Tower Task Force Dr. Jeff Liva, Allen Cohen, Rebecca Rogers

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF RF EME LEVELS FROM MOBILE TELEPHONE BASE STATIONS LOCATED AT LEICHHARDT, NSW

Keywords Mobile Tower Radiations, Electromagnetic Radiations, Signal Strength, Mobile Phone

Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation

LTE: Technology and Health. 4G and Mobile Broadband

Electromagnetic radiation exposure: assessment against ACA mandated limits

What the experts say: The consensus of scientific opinion

Electromagnetic Radiation towards Adult Human Head from Handheld Mobile Phones

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the head of Tablet user's

Measurements of radiofrequency fields from a WEL Networks Smart Meter

What are radio signals?

September 26, 2000 IMST GmbH Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Str. 2 D Kamp-Lintfort

REVIEW OF EXPOSURE LIMITS AND HEALTH CONCERNS SANTA ANA. Base Station Telecommunication Transmitters UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Guidelines on the assessment of installations against electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure limits

EMFs Exposure Monitoring and SAR Certification in Telecom Italia

GSM Base Station Radiation Level: A Case Study of University of Nigeria Environment

For many years the general public

Annex to the joint statement: Exposure of the general public to radiofrequency fields

Wireless Power Transfer

Electromagnetic radiation exposure: assessment against ACA mandated limits

Technical Guide for Interpretation and Compliance Assessment of Health Canada s Radiofrequency Exposure Guidelines

Mobile use, radio signals and health

An equivalent circuit of a loop antenna.

Assessment of SAR in a human exposed to GSM electromagnetic fields

EMR-300 Broadband RF Survey Meter

Statement of the Chief Medical Health Officer

EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ON ORGANISMS AND PROTECTION PRINCIPLES

Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 khz to 300 GHz

The Salzburg Model: A Precautionary Strategy for Siting of Base Stations

Mr. Richard Tell Chair, IEEE SCC28 (SC4) Risk Assessment Work Group Richard Tell Associates, Inc Garnet Canyon Lane Las Vegas, NV

Low SAR planar antenna for multi standard cellular phones

Occupational Exposure Assessment on an FM Mast: Electric Field and SAR Values

A study on specific absorption rate (SAR) due to non-ionizing radiation from wireless/telecommunication in Bangladesh

Interaction of Mobile Phone Waves with Tissues of Skeletal Muscles and Bone of Human Beings

How To Understand The Kv3Um Electro Magnetic Radiation

Evaluating Cell Phone and Personal Communications Equipment and their EMC Effects on Automotive Audio and In-Cabin Modules

Exposure to EMFs from Lightweight Aviation Transponders

OpenWay Radio Frequency FAQ

SAR Distribution in Test Animals Exposed to RF Radiation

SAR Test Report: Type Number FAD BV; FCC ID PY7FD022012; IC 4170B-FD022012

Working safely around Radiofrequency (RF) Transmitters

SAR ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF HANDS-FREE MOBILE TELEPHONES

Microwave Exposure from Mobile Phones and Base Stations in Sweden

Comments on the Draft Report by the California Council on Science and Technology Health Impacts of Radio Frequency from Smart Meters

Harmful effects of 41 and 202 MHz radiations on some body parts and tissues

Current Probes. User Manual

Transcription:

Human Exposure Limits Session 3 0 Version December 2014

Learning objectives In this session we will: Learn about the international exposure limits for workers and the public Learn about methods for assessing compliance Learn about important considerations when choosing measurement equipment Learn about how to present measurement results 1

Increasing frequency Established mechanisms for RF energy 6. Surface heating of the body 5. Microwave hearing effect 4. Localised heating in the head and torso 3. Localised heating in the limbs 2. Whole body heating 1. Electro-stimulation of nerve and muscle ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 2

2. Whole body heating Core body temperature varies naturally about 1ºC Core body temperature rises of more than 1-2 ºC over prolonged periods can have adverse health effects such as heat exhaustion (headache, nausea & dizziness) and heat stroke SAR = specific absorption rate (units of W/kg) The rate at which RF energy is absorbed in body tissues Normal loads from activity vary from about 1 to 10 W/kg A WBA SAR of 1 W/kg for one hour, and up to 4 W/kg for short periods, will result in a rise of less than 1ºC in core body temperature in resting subjects in moderate thermal environments. Worker limit of 0.4 W/kg accounts for other thermal loads. 3

Formula for SAR SAR = σ ρ E2 (unit of W/kg) Where: σ = dielectric conductivity (Siemens/m S/m) ρ = tissue density (kg/m 3 ); E = internal electric field strength (V/m) It can also be calculated from the rate of temperature rise. 4

Factors affecting whole body SAR Intensity of the RF field Frequency of the RF field Polarisation of the RF field Size of the person Grounding of the person 5

Normalised SAR (W/kg per W/m 2 ) RF energy absorption versus frequency Section 5.4 in WHO EHC 137, 1993 6

4. Localised heating in the head and trunk The brain and vital organs are more sensitive to heating than the limbs. For the public: Head/trunk 2 W/kg. Limbs 4 W/kg Localised SAR is averaged over 10 grams. Point SAR distribution 3dB contours 7

Measurement of handset SAR International recommended limit: 2 W/kg in mass of 10 g brain metabolic rate of 8-10 W/kg Maximum temperature rises during phone use: eye ~0.02 C brain <0.10 C much less than normal 1 C daily variation. International measurement standards. 8

SAR testing of mobile devices http://www.gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/base_stations/index.html 9

6. Surface heating At frequencies above 10 GHz the skin depth of absorption is very small. Skin depth penetration at 10 GHz = 3.8 mm Skin depth penetration at 100 GHz = 0.36 mm RF power at high frequencies is absorbed as surface heating, similar to heating from an infrared lamp. The exposure limit is based on incident power density. 10

Indirect effects: shocks and burns Can result from contact with a live RF conductor. Can also result from point contact with a passively charged, large metallic ungrounded conductor. Point contact results in higher current densities than grasping contact. RF burns tend to damage deeper layers of the skin. They can be very painful and may take a long time to heal. 11

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Partner of the World Health Organization ICNIRP is an independent group of international experts responsible for providing scientific advice on possible health effects and for assisting in the development of protection policies. ICNIRP Recommendations: Based on evaluation of all scientific evidence Include substantial safety factors Protective of all persons (young, old, sick) from all established hazards www.icnirp.org 12

WHO and ITU recommend ICNIRP limits...endorses the guidelines of the International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and encourages Member States to adopt these international guidelines...' If such limits do not exist, or if they do not cover the frequencies of interest, then ICNIRP limits (Appendix I) should be used' WHO Standards and Guidelines 13

WHO support for ICNIRP following reviews of all the peer-reviewed scientific literature, including thermal and non-thermal effects. The standards are based on evaluations of biological effects that have been established to have health consequences. The main conclusion from the WHO reviews is that EMF exposures below the limits recommended in the ICNIRP international guidelines do not appear to have any known consequence on health. WHO Standards and Guidelines 14

ICNIRP EMF Limits provide protection against known adverse health effects. An adverse health effect causes detectable impairment of the health of the exposed individual or of his or her offspring; a biological effect, on the other hand, may or may not result in an adverse health effect.' the scientific literature published since the 1998 guidelines has provided no evidence of any adverse effects below the basic restrictions and does not necessitate an immediate revision of its guidance on limiting exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields' http://www.icnirp.org/

Radio Frequency Exposure Developing conservative limit values Adverse effects threshold (100% = 4 W/kg) Worker level: 10% = 0.4 W/kg Public level: 2% = 0.08 W/kg Note: Diagram not to scale. 16

ICNIRP basic restrictions for RF Basic restrictions: Based directly on established health effects. Physical quantities are SAR and power density (S). Only power density in air can be readily measured. ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 17

ICNIRP basic restrictions SAR Type of exposure Occupational General public Frequency range Whole-body average SAR (W/kg) Localized SAR (head and trunk) (W/kg) Localized SAR (limbs) (W/kg) 100 khz-10 MHz 0.4 10 20 10 MHz-10 GHz 0.4 10 20 100 khz-10 MHz 0.08 2 4 10 MHz-10 GHz 0.08 2 4 NOTE 1 f is the frequency in Hertz. NOTE 3 All SAR values are to be averaged over any 6-minute period. NOTE 4 The localized SAR averaging mass is any 10 g of contiguous tissue; the maximum SAR so obtained should be the value used for the estimation of exposure. ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 18

ICNIRP reference levels Reference levels: Provided for practical exposure assessment purposes. Derived quantities E, H and S. Compliance with the reference level intended to ensure compliance with the relevant basic restriction. If the value exceeds the reference level, it does not necessarily follow that the basic restriction will be exceeded. If a reference level is exceeded, it is necessary to test compliance with the relevant basic restriction. ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 19

ICNIRP reference levels for RF fields Type of exposure Occupational exposure General public Frequency range Electric field strength (V/m) Magnetic field strength (A/m) Equivalent plane wave power density S eq (W/m 2 ) 1-10 MHz 610/f 1.6/f 10-400 MHz 61 0.16 10 400-2000 MHz 3f 1/2 0.008f 1/2 f/40 2-300 GHz 137 0.36 50 1-10 MHz 87/f 1/2 0.73/f 10-400 MHz 28 0.073 2 400-2000 MHz 1.375f 1/2 0.0037f 1/2 f/200 2-300 GHz 61 0.16 10 NOTE 1 f is as indicated in the frequency range column. NOTE 2 For frequencies between 100 khz and 10 GHz, the averaging time is 6 minutes. NOTE 5 For frequencies exceeding 10 GHz, the averaging time is 68/f 1.05 minutes (f in GHz). ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 20

Power Density (W/m 2 ) Compliance limits for antennas RF Workers f/40 Public f/200 Worker Public Frequency (MHz) ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 21

ICNIRP limit values may be reviewed ICNIRP (2009): Some published studies showed that in the frequency ranges of body resonance (~100 MHz) and from 1 to 4 GHz for bodies shorter than 1.3 m in height (corresponding approximately to children aged 8 y or younger) at the recommended reference level the induced SARs could be up to 40% higher than the current basic restriction under worstcase conditions. However, this is negligible compared with the large reduction factor of 50 (5,000%) for the general public. Possibility of future adjustment to reference levels. Post WHO Environmental Health Criteria process (2015?). ICNIRP has not identified evidence pointing to a need to change the basic restrictions related to SAR. ICNIRP 2009 Statement 22

Compliance for antenna sites Version December 2014

Antenna exposure zones Exceedance Zone (No Access) Occupational Zone (Workers) Compliance Zone (Public) 24

General principles for RF exposure evaluations Identify appropriate compliance limits Determine if RF exposure assessment is needed If needed: Calculations Measurement If exposure limits may be exceeded, apply mitigation. 25

Compliance versus environmental Compliance relatively high fields: Calculation Broadband measurements Narrowband measurements SAR assessments Environmental low level fields: Calculation Broadband measurements Narrowband measurements Communication 26

Antenna field regions Reactive Near-Field Region λ/2π 2D 2 /λ or 0.5λ Radiating Far-Field Region Antenna Radiating Near-Field Region 27

Near-field and far-field In the near-field: E and H are not in phase The field impedance varies The antenna pattern is still being formed Simple formulas tend to over-estimate In the far-field: The E and H vectors are in phase The impedance is 377 Ohms (in free space) The antenna pattern is fully formed Simple formulas may be used 28

Large and small antennas Electrical size is not physical size. Large antenna dimensions >>λ. Three field regions: Near field reactive out to λ/2π Near field radiating at distances out to 2D 2 /λ Far field at distances > 2D 2 /λ Small antenna dimensions < λ Two field regions: Near field reactive out to λ/2π Far field at distances > 2D 2 /λ 29

Non-uniform exposure when close to source 30

Compliance: broadband measurements Measure reference levels Establish compliance zones Practical field measurements Includes all other sources in frequency range Near-field E and H Averaging Other hazards 31

Basic broadband RF survey instrument Metering Instrumentation Sensor 3.14 Leads 32

Units of measurement Meters will either measure: Electric field via dipole antennas Magnetic field via loop antennas However, some display mw/cm²: Internal conversion based on E/H = Z Care must be taken that correct probe is used In near field, may need to use both E and H probe. 33

Desirable meter characteristics Meter: Responds to modulated fields Good accuracy Good sensitivity Wide dynamic range Portability Not sensitive to temperature changes Peak and average value options Lightweight Probe: Responds to E or H only Small size and non-perturbing Broad and flat response Isotropic and linear response Sums multiple signals correctly Low noise Robust 34

Calibration factors Survey instruments do not have a flat response with frequency, so calibration factors are used. True field = Measured field x Calibration Factor Use the calibration factor closest in frequency to the service being measured. Calibration accuracy is typically ±1dB. 35

RF measurement procedures (1) Before conducting a survey: Identify frequencies and powers present Estimate likely hazard zone distances Choose E, H or both probes, as appropriate Use calibration factor to determine meter indication for relevant exposure limit Note other environmental hazards, e.g., working at height Check meter is operating correctly before and after the survey 36

RF measurement procedures (2) During a survey: Observe the maximum exposure limit! Start in low field and avoid body shielding Scan over body height to locate the peak Scan metallic members, but beware of probe coupling effects Rotate probe to peak reading, but hold still for measurement Take enough measurements, applying calibration factor 37

Measurements close to antennas http://www.gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/base_stations/index.html 38

Complex sites Contributions from many sources. 39

Environmental radio signals FM GSM900 GSM1800 3G LTE T-DAB TETRA 40

Environmental RF evaluations Why? What? Where? When? How? 41

Environmental: narrowband measurements Calibrated receiver and antenna Good sensitivity Measures individual sources Polarisation of antenna Standardised positioning Effects of radio traffic Time consuming Antenna Spectrum analyser Study on the Feasibility of Epidemiological Studies on Health Effects of Mobile Telephone Base Stations Final Report, Neubauer et al., ARC-IT 0124, March 2005. 42

Environmental RF measurements http://www.gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/base_stations/index.html 43

Environmental levels from mobile network antennas Median levels more than 10,000 times below the limit values. Joyner, Van Wyk and Rowley, 2014 44

Average contributions of environmental RF sources Joseph et al, 2012 45

Compliance for multiple sources Calculate the fractions of the limit for each source. Add the fractions together. If the total 1 then the location is compliant. If the total > 1 then the location is non-compliant. Shared sites. ICNIRP 1998 EMF Guidelines 46

Measurement uncertainty Instrument errors Inaccuracies in the response of the meter and incorrect use. May be limited to ±1dB if: Meter is properly zeroed Calibration factor correctly applied Probe rotated to remove isotropic error Environmental errors Due to objects which alter the field being measured. May be limited to ±2dB if: Foreign objects (e.g. cars, etc) are removed A large number of measurements are made to account for reflections 47

Compliance: calculations Assessment without measurement Requires information about antenna, transmitter and so on Based on conservative assumptions Basis for compliance declarations Multiple sources? 2 m 48

Far-field estimation of field strengths S = P G 4 d² W/m² P = Power to antenna (W) G = Linear isotropic gain d = Distance from antenna (m) 49

ITU EMF Estimator (ITU-T K.70) 50

Estimation of compliance distances d = P G 4 S (m) S = (W/m²) P = Power to antenna (W) G = Linear isotropic gain d = Distance from antenna (m) 51

Activity Individual exercise: Calculating exposure levels and compliance distances 52

Calculating exposure levels Power into the antenna = 43 dbm Antenna gain = 16 dbi Distance from the antenna = 10 m 53

Calculating exposure levels Power into the antenna = 43 dbm = 20 W Antenna gain = 16 dbi = 40 Distance from the antenna = 10 m S = P G 4 d² W/m² S = 20 x 40 4 10² = 0.64 W/m² 54

Calculating compliance distances Power into the antenna = 43 dbm Antenna gain = 16 dbi Limit at 900 MHz for the public = 900/200 = 4.5 W/m 2 55

Calculating compliance distances Power into the antenna = 43 dbm = 20 W Antenna gain = 16 dbi = 40 Limit at 900 MHz for the public = 900/200 = 4.5 W/m 2 d = P G 4 S (m) d = 20 x 40 4 4.5 = 3.8 m 56

Reporting Results: Public Communication Who is the audience? Provide the actual reading and value relative to the exposure limit: Fraction of the exposure limit or times below the limit. Compare based on power density Provide an estimate of uncertainty Use pictures, charts and simple tables where possible 57

Example: UK Mobile Phone Base Station Audit Operators declare compliance Regulator measures sample of sites: On-going program 2001 to 2012 Now only on request Emphasis on schools and hospitals www.ofcom.org.uk 58

Human exposure limit summary In this session we have: Learned about the international exposure limits for workers and the public Learned about methods for assessing compliance Learned about important considerations when choosing measurement equipment Learned about how to present measurement results 59