New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to the City of Arlington, TX's Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A&B; outlook is stable

Similar documents
New Issue: MOODY'S: CITY OF SAN DIEGO'S SUBORDINATED WATER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS RATED Aa3

Rating Action: Moody's changes Nexteer's Ba1 ratings outlook to positive Global Credit Research - 24 Nov 2015

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Los Angeles County Capital Asset Leasing Corporation CA's equipment lease revenue bonds

AFFIRMS A1 RATING ON $9 MILLION GENERAL OBLIGATION UNLIMITED TAX DEBT OUTSTANDING

Rating Action: Moody's affirms ISAGEN's Baa3 Issuer rating and changed the outlook stable Global Credit Research - 15 May 2015

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades LEAF Receivables Funding equipment backed ABS from 2011 and 2012

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Puerto Rico GO and related bonds to Ba2, notched bonds to Ba3 and COFINA bonds to Baa1, Baa2; outlook negative

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Scottish Widows' and Clerical Medical's subordinated debt ratings to Baa1(hyb); outlook stable

Policy for Record Retention for Rating Services

Rating Action: Moody's places MBIA Insurance Corporation's B3 IFS rating on review for upgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Feb 2014

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook to negative from stable on Argentine Banks' deposit ratings; affirms deposit ratings

Announcement: Moody's assigns Aaa/MR1 bond fund and market risk ratings to IMET 1-3 Year Fund Global Credit Research - 13 Jan 2012

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aaa.br rating to Duke's BRL479 million debentures; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns first-time Ba1 CFR to Turkish Airlines; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 06 Mar 2015

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Hypo Alpe Adria's guaranteed debt ratings to non-investment grade, ratings remain on review for downgrade

Moody's: Increasing demand prompts rapid growth of cyber insurance market

Rating Action: Moody's rates Lincoln Finance Limited's Senior Secured Notes at B1 with a stable outlook

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Royal Bank of Scotland's ratings for downgrade

General Obligation Limited Tax

Rating Action: Moody's assigns first time ratings to Texas Capital Bancshares (issuer at Baa3)

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aaa to mortgage covered bonds of Raiffeisen- Landesbank Steiermark

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 Insurance Financial Strength Rating to Tryg Forsikring; positive outlook

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Rosemount, MN's Ser GO Bonds

Rating Action: Moody's assigns B3 CFR to Outokumpu Oyj.; positive outlook Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2016

New Issue: MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa3 RATING TO SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION'S WATER REVENUE BONDS

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook on Erste Group Bank's Baa2 senior ratings to positive

D Duke Energy Carolinas coal Spill - A1 Rating

Revenue: Government Enterprise

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Villanova University, PA's $139M Ser. 2015; outlook stable

Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings

Student Housing Revenue Bonds MJH Education Assistance Illinois IV LLC (Fullerton Village Project)

Cash Flow Settling into Low Level of Growth Amid Negative Outlook

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades CDC, OSEO and AFD to Aa1, negative; outlook changed to negative on Credit Mutuel group entities

Rating Update: Moody's upgrades Liberty University's (VA) bonds to Aa3; outlook stable

Rating Action: Moody's reviews for downgrade the ratings of MBIA Inc. and of its lead insurance subsidiaries Global Credit Research - 21 Mar 2013


Credit Opinion: Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company

Impact of Hurricane Sandy on. and Reinsurance Industry

Credit Card Pool Performance Forecast

Credit Opinion: Coface Seguro de Credito Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Rating Action: Moody's takes actions on 4 Norwegian regional banks

University of Ottawa, Canada

Credit Opinion: Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Belfius Bank's senior unsecured rating at Baa1/P- 2; outlook stable

Moody s Rates Rabobank Nederland s Senior Contingent Notes issued in 2010 at Baa2(hyb)

Credit Opinion: Al-Ain Ahlia Insurance Co.

SURA Asset Management Lifted By Rising Wave of Retirement Savings in Latin America

Rating Action: Moody's affirms five Tunisian banks' ratings; changes outlooks to stable for four of the banks

Credit Opinion: AG Insurance

Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Call

Credit Opinion: Ekspo Faktoring A.S.

Earnings And Cash Flow Improvements Expected in the next Months, But Planned Deleveraging Remains Critical

City of Naperville, IL

Rating Update: Moody's revises Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group's (IL) outlook to positive; A2 rating affirmed

Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on six Hungarian banks Global Credit Research - 11 Nov 2015

Credit Opinion: Munich Reinsurance Company

Credit Opinion: Alberta, Province of

Credit Opinion: GDF SUEZ SA

Credit Opinion: Akzo Nobel N.V.

How To Understand And Understand The Financial Sector In Turkish Finance Companies

Page 1 of 5. Sao Paulo, Brazil. Ratings. Contacts. Key Indicators. Opinion 3/23/2015. Credit Opinion: Banco Industrial do Brasil S.A.

City of Bothell, WA. Annual Comment on Bothell RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 28 April 2016

Credit Opinion: AXA. Global Credit Research - 09 Jul Ratings. Contacts. Key Indicators. Opinion SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE.

Credit Opinion: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Credit Opinion: Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank

Rating Action: Moody's concludes reviews of German co-operative banks' ratings

Ændring i rating outlook

Credit Opinion: SkandiaBanken AB

Rating Action: Moody's concludes review on Lansforsakringar Bank AB (publ), Skandiabanken AB and Volvofinans Bank AB

AnaCredit Gives Banks an Opportunity to Improve Data Management, but Challenges Remain

MOODY S UPGRADES TO Baa2 WITH POSITIVE OUTLOOK AEROPORTI DI ROMA S RATING

Credit Opinion: Letshego Holdings Limited


Credit Opinion: Bolzano, Autonomous Province of

KLP Boligkreditt Mortgage Covered Bonds Programme Covered Bonds / Norway

Credit Opinion: Sheridan Investment Partners I, LLC

Rating Action: Rating action: Moody's concludes review on six Dutch banks' ratings

Rating Action: Moody's concludes review on four Belgian banks' ratings

Credit Opinion: BH Securities, a.s.

Credit Opinion: Old Mutual Plc

Credit Opinion: Growthpoint Properties Limited

Credit Opinion: OeBB-Infrastruktur AG

Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Ratings. Contacts. Key Indicators. Opinion 4/14/2015. Credit Opinion: Banco Bonsucesso S.A.

ISSUER COMMENT 30 APRIL Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc - United Kingdom. Summary Opinion

Credit Opinion: Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

The Financial & Strategic Outlook for Private Colleges. January 5, 2015

Structured FINANCE Die Kongressmesse für Unternehmensfinanzierung Moody s Rating Committee Simulation MATTHIAS HELLSTERN, MANAGING DIRECTOR

Helgeland Boligkreditt AS - Mortgage Covered Bonds

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades ratings of 7 French banks and backed ratings of another 6 French banks; outlook stable

Credit Opinion: Latvenergo AS

Credit Opinion: China Life Insurance Co Ltd

Kyobo Life Insurance Co., Ltd

Growthpoint Properties Limited

Infrastructure Needs Drive Higher Capital Spending in 2015 and 2016

Credit Opinion: Co-Operative Bank Plc

Rating Action: Moody's places four Hungarian banks' ratings on review for upgrade

Announcement: Moody's Places the Ratings of Five Norwegian Savings Banks on Review for Downgrade

Self-Storage Industry Is Poised for More Growth

Credit Opinion: Banco Cooperativo Español, S.A.

Rating Action: Moody's concludes review on 12 Norwegian banks' ratings

Transcription:

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to the City of Arlington, TX's Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A&B; outlook is stable Global Credit Research - 11 May 2015 Aa2 rating affects $149 million of debt inclusive of current sale ARLINGTON (CITY OF) TX WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships) TX Moody's Rating ISSUE Water and Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A Sale Amount $17,880,000 Expected Sale Date 05/17/15 Rating Description Revenue: Government Enterprise Water and Wastewater System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2015B Sale Amount $11,560,000 Expected Sale Date 05/17/15 Rating Description Revenue: Government Enterprise RATING Aa2 Aa2 Moody's Outlook STA NEW YORK, May 11, 2015 --Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the City of Arlington, TX's $17.9 million Series 2015A and $11.6 million refunding Series 2015B Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds. Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the Aa2 rating on the system's $132 million of parity debt outstanding. SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE The Aa2 rating reflects the system's large and diverse service area, satisfactory financial operations which consistently yields strong debt service coverage, a low direct debt profile, and a healthy balance sheet. Also considered is the narrow unreserved system liquidity relative to peers that is tempered by ample reserved balances and liquidity outside of the water and sewer fund. OUTLOOK The stable outlook reflects the anticipation of satisfactory operations over the near term. While the city will continue to issue debt in order to partially fund their capital improvement plan, annual rate increases are expected to support additional debt issuance and maintain coverage. WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP - Significantly improved unrestricted liquidity - Strengthened legal covenants - Return to a trend of stable annual debt service coverage WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN - Trend of narrowed debt service coverage inconsistent with the rating

- Decreased unrestricted liquidity - Substantial increase to the debt ratio STRENGTHS - Large and diverse service area - Cash-funding of capital improvements reflected by low direct debt profile - Ample restricted reserves and funds outside the enterprise - Strong and improving balance sheet CHALLENGES - Narrow unrestricted cash position - Recent trend of declining debt service coverage RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Recent developments are incorporated in the Detailed Rating Rationale. DETAILED RATING RATIONALE SERVICE AREA AND CUSTOMER BASE: LARGE AND DIVERSE SERVICE AREA IN DALLAS/FORT WORTH METROPLEX; AMPLE WATER SUPPLY AND TREATMENT CAPACITY Located in Tarrant County (Aaa stable), the city of Arlington (Aa1 stable) has a large and diverse tax base characterized by residential development (nearly two thirds of the base) as well as significant industrial and commercial development, including ATT Stadium, the Dallas Cowboys and Texas Rangers sports franchises, UT Arlington, and major amusement parks, General Motors (manufacturing and finance), and healthcare establishments. The city serves as a regional employment center located equidistant from Fort Worth (Aa1 stable) and Dallas (Aa1 stable). New development and redevelopment in the city has bolstered growth over the past five years, bringing the city's fiscal 2015 tax base to $18.9 billion, with an expectation of 4% growth for fiscal 2016. The city is mature although experiencing modest growth in population, which currently stands at approximately 369,000. Residential customers account for 93% of the customer base by count of units served. The system's historical number of customers has been relatively stable over the past five years, and at present is equal to 147,685 units. The city obtains untreated water from the Tarrant Regional Water District's (TRWD) surface reservoirs. TRWD estimates sufficient supply through 2030 to meet the needs of the city of Arlington and other municipal participants, although is currently in planning stages to extend that estimation through 2060. The treatment of raw water is provided by two city owned treatment facilities that presently have a capacity for 172.5 million gallons per day (MGD), which well exceeds the peak flow during the drier fiscal 2011 of 115 MGD. The system is well-poised to provide for projected build-out peak demand of 135 MGD. Wastewater is treated by the Trinity River Authority (TRA) at its central regional facility. City officials believe that TRA has sufficient treatment capacity to serve the city's present and foreseeable future needs. DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE AND NET WORKING CAPITAL: ADEQUATE COVERAGE EXPECTED TO CONTINUE SUPPORTED BY ANNUAL RATE INCREASES The system's financial operations have been bolstered by multi-year rate increases going back ten-plus years. We believe the city's demonstrated willingness to raise rates as necessary to cover increasing operating costs and maintain a healthy level of debt service coverage is a credit positive. Net revenues of the system have historically been healthy, albeit declining, in part due to wetter weather and robust conservation and efficiency efforts. Despite this, based on fiscal 2014 net revenues of $37.8 million, debt service coverage was a strong 2.57x. With an overall rate increase of 8.8% that came into effect January 2015 and financial results year-to-date tracking ahead of budget, the city expects to maintain the current coverage level. To note, this coverage calculation does not specifically segregate the city's share of debt issued by TRWD related to infrastructure improvements to access to raw water supply. While the debt is not a debt of the city, a portion of the debt service is passed to the city as an operating expenses under the city's contract with the water district, and is combined with their bill for purchase of

untreated water. Being an operating expense, which is paid before any direct revenue bonds debt service, any cost increases related to either the additional cost of raw water or further infrastructure spending, is passed onto to customers and built into the rate setting models of the city. Liquidity and Net Working Capital The city has a policy of maintaining unrestricted reserves equal to 60 days of operating expenses, which is notably narrower than most water utility systems. Fiscal 2014 unrestricted cash slightly exceeded the policy, equaling $13.6 million, or 63 days of cash on hand. This practice is partially tempered by the system's annual use of excess cash to fund capital needs, maintaining a notably low debt ratio of 17% as of fiscal 2014. In addition, the system maintains significant restricted resources that presently act to offset cash-funded capital expenses on an annual basis. As of fiscal 2014, the system maintained $51 million in restricted cash earmarked for capital construction, and annual transfer out to fund capital could halted if necessary. With the ongoing investment in the system, the system's net working capital position is adequate at 122% as of fiscal 2014. To note, the city continues to maintain significant additional resources outside of the major governmental and business funds with approximately $118 million in the Arlington Tomorrow Fund. Derived from natural gas bonus payments and royalties received by the city, the Foundation is controlled by a board, made up of the city council and an executive director that is technically an employee of the city. The city council established a maximum $100 million corpus for the fund, which has been achieved, with grants to the community coming only out of earnings. We believe the $100 million corpus of the Arlington Tomorrow Fund provides a potential operating resource given a super-majority vote of city council could enable it to used for any lawful purpose of the city. DEBT AND LEGAL COVENANTS: PARTIAL CASH FUNDING OF CIP REFLECTS LOW DEBT PROFILE; ADEQUATE LEGAL STRUCTURE Debt Structure As mentioned, the debt ratio is favorable at 17% as of fiscal 2014, as well as the debt to operating revenues of 1.04x. Amortization is also favorable, with 71% of principal retired within ten years. The system's three year capital improvement plan includes $151 million in planned capital expenditures, of which approximately 45% will be cash funded and the remaining portion will be debt funded. To note, historically management has opted to forgo debt issuance in the event revenues significantly exceeded budget, therefore the funding mechanism for the capital improvement plan could shift. Given the system's historically conservative debt issuance practices, rapid rate of principal amortization and proactive rate adjustments, we believe the debt profile will remain manageable over the long term. Debt-Related Derivatives The city does not have any derivative agreements. Legal Covenants Legal provisions provide adequate bondholder security. The rate covenant requires net revenues to produce 1.25 times average annual debt service. The debt service reserve fund is equal to average annual debt service funded over 24 months, and was fully funded with cash as of fiscal 2014. The additional bonds test requires 1.25 times average annual debt service. Finally, excess revenues may be used for any lawful purpose. MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE Management of the city of Arlington water and sewer department provide departmental administration within the framework of the city's council-manager form of government. Management of the system has been characterized by prudent fiscal practices and forward-looking planning to create greater efficiencies and conservation within the water and sewer system. KEY STATISTICS - Asset condition (remaining useful life): 41 years - System size (O&M): $78.7 million - Service area wealth: 96% of US - Annual debt service coverage (fiscal 2014): 2.57x MADs

- Annual debt service coverage (fiscal 2014): 2.57x MADs - Debt to Operating Revenues (fiscal 2014): 1.04x - Rate covenant: 1.25x average annual debt service - Debt service reserve requirement: 100% of average annual debt service funded over 24 months OBLIGOR PROFILE The city of Arlington, TX is located in the center of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. The city encompasses 99.5 square miles and has a current population of approximately 369,000. The city operates its water and sewer system as a self-supporting enterprise fund. LEGAL SECURITY The Series 2015A and 2015B Bonds are secured by a first lien on the net revenues of the system. USE OF PROCEEDS Proceeds from the sale of the 2015A bonds will be used to fund a portion of the system's annual capital improvement plan, and the Series 2015B bonds will refund certain outstanding maturities for debt service savings. PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was US Municipal Utility Revenue Debt published in December 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Denise Rappmund Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Nathan Phelps Backup Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service John Nichols Additional Contact

Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA 2015 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ( MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ) MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s Publications.

the Moody s Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODY S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. For Japan only: MOODY'S Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MOODY'S Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.