ZPIC, RAC and MAC Audits Proactive vs. Reactive Approach



Similar documents
Fraud & Abuse: Part 2

TM Nightingale. Home Healthcare. Fraud & Abuse: Prevention, Detection, & Reporting

USC Office of Compliance

Understanding Health Reform s

False Claims / Federal Deficit Reduction Act Notice Help Stop Healthcare Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Report to the Firelands Corporate Compliance Officer

How To Get A Medical Bill Of Health From A Member Of A Health Care Provider

Compliance with Applicable Federal and State Laws - False Claims Act and Similar Laws

SELF AUDITS AND DISCLOSURES IN A RAC WORLD. Kathleen Houston Drummy Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Los Angeles, CA

The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act and Healthcare Reform: Implications for Compliance Initiatives and Fraud Investigations

PREVENTING FRAUD, ABUSE, & WASTE: A Primer for Physical Therapists

Objectives. Fraud and Abuse defined Enforcement agencies Fraud and Abuse regulations Five-step action plan

Recovery Audit Contractor Program

A Roadmap for New Physicians. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse

Addressing Government Investigations. Marcos Daniel Jimenez Partner

Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws

Medicare Advantage and Part D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training. October 2010

The False Claims Act: Hospital Strategies to Avoid Business Ending Fines

To: All Vendors, Agents and Contractors of Hutchinson Regional Medical Center

Frequently Used Health Care Laws

MEDICARE RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTORS AND CMS S ACTIONS TO ADDRESS IMPROPER PAYMENTS, REFERRALS OF POTENTIAL FRAUD, AND PERFORMANCE

Skilled Nursing Facility Compliance Driven by Quality Initiatives. The Organizational Architecture for Quality

I. Policy Purpose. II. Policy Statement. III. Policy Definitions: RESPONSIBILITY:

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS

Fraud and Abuse. Current Trends and Enforcement Activities

SCAN Health Plan Policy and Procedure Number: CRP-0067, False Claims Act & Deficit Reduction Act 2005

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and Medicare. The Who, What, When, Where, How and Why?

Program Integrity Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

2/21/2014. Therapy Utilization in Long Term Care: Is It Really Over Utilization

FRAUD AND ABUSE (SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS)

Federal False Claims Act (31 USC 3729 through 3733)

Fraud and Abuse and Program Integrity Provisions. in the Health Care Reform Law

TAANA 2015 Learn Lessons from CIAs: Decode the Documentation Demands

Charging, Coding and Billing Compliance

Stark, False Claims and Anti- Kickback Laws: Easy Ways to Stay Compliant with the Big Three in Healthcare

CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES

Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) and Medicare The Who, What, When, Where, Why and How?

Amy K. Fehn. I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program

Page: 1 of 5. Pharmacy Fraud, Waste and Abuse Policy. 1.0 Compliance Assurance. 2.0 Procedure

Multnomah County Department of County Human Services

FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE. Training for First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities. Slide 1 of 24

Behavioral Healthcare, Inc. 155 Inverness Drive West Suite 201 Englewood, CO 80112

Compliance with False Claims Act

This policy applies to UNTHSC employees, volunteers, contractors and agents.

AVOIDING FRAUD AND ABUSE

The Fraud and Abuse Environment for Anesthesiologists

Summary of Anti-Fraud Provisions in the Affordable Care Act

Avoiding Medicaid Fraud. Odyssey House of Utah Questions? Contact your Program Director or Emily Capito, Director of Operations

fraud, waste, abuse, compliance, integrity, Integrity Help Line

Colorado West HealthCare System Grand Junction, CO

THE FRAUD PREVENTION SYSTEM IDENTIFIED MILLIONS IN MEDICARE SAVINGS, BUT THE DEPARTMENT COULD STRENGTHEN SAVINGS DATA

Prevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse

False Claims Act CMP212

Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10

Medicare Reviews. Why Does Medicare Conduct Reviews? Definitions

Touchstone Health Training Guide: Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention

Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]

A summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act

Policies and Procedures SECTION:

LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse

Fraud, Waste & Abuse. UPMC Health Plan Quality Audit, Fraud, Waste & Abuse Department

Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

PITTSBURGH CARE PARTNERSHIP, INC. COMMUNITY LIFE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL. False Claims Act Explanation and Reporting Requirements

Fraud Prevention Training Requirements For Medicare Advantage Plans

Medicare Compliance and Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

2015 Fraud, Waste & Abuse Prevention

Federal False Claims Act

Compliance Lessons from Recent OIG Enforcement Activities. The Players. The Players Continued

Combating Waste, Fraud, Abuse; Ability to Report Wrongdoing for Federal/Georgia Beneficiaries POLICY: AC.ETH.01.12

Healthcare Compliance. Provider CME

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Page 1 of 9

Kitch Drutchas Wagner Valitutti & Sherbrook One Woodward Avenue, Suite 2400 Detroit, MI

Healthcare Fraud Enforcement and Compliance Strategies

HPC Healthcare, Inc. Administrative/Operational Policy and Procedure Manual

Deficit Reduction Act of Employee Education About False Claims Recovery

Medicare Compliance Training and Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training. Producer Training

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training

VNSNY CORPORATE. DRA Policy

Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Senior Care Division and Volunteer State Health Plan

Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Investigations, Prosecutions and Compliance Strategies

Policies and Procedures

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Sites: All Centers Hospital Policy and Procedure Manual Number: D160 Page 1 of 9

Policies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005

Program Integrity (PI) for Network Providers

Physician Practice: Avoiding the Other F Word Fraud, or Identifying Your Risks in Coding and Billing. G2N, Inc. Honest & Healthy Bottom Lines

HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Administrative Policy Manual

CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY MANUAL

ADMINISTRATION POLICY MEMORANDUM

Fraud Waste & A buse

SUBJECT: FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICY: CP 6018

Provider Training Series The Search for Compliance Annual Mandatory Training for all Providers

MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S Revised

ME DIC BENEFIT INTEGRITY ACTIVITIES IN MEDICARE PARTS C AND D

Medicare Fraud. Programs supported by HCFAC have returned more money to the Medicare Trust Funds than the dollars spent to combat the fraud.

Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act

NOYES HEALTH ADMINISTRATION POLICY/PROCEDURE

RAC Preparation 7 Key Steps and Best Practices

Federal Health Care Fraud & Abuse, Compliance and Program Integrity

Transcription:

YOUR DATES HERE YOUR LOGO HERE ZPIC, RAC and MAC Audits Proactive vs. Reactive Approach Lisa Thomson, Vice President Pathway Health 877-777-5463 www.pathwayhealth.com YOUR LOGO HERE OBJECTIVES Understand the different types of audits related to reimbursement: ZPIC, RAC, and MAC Determine proactive approaches for positive positioning to audits Describe the importance of a facility compliance plan to cultivate an environment of compliance Identify leadership monitoring protocols for ongoing compliance and quality outcomes 1

Current Healthcare Landscape 2

Proactive vs. Reactive Approach Leadership Tactics for this changing Environment Education and Knowledge Internal Review Data Agenda Preparedness and Protection Performance Improvement Proactive vs. Reactive Approach Knowledge and Education Current Healthcare Landscape 3

Healthcare Landscape Healthcare Landscape Why External Government Audits? Improper payments Payments for services that were not medically necessary Payments for services that were incorrectly coded Providers failed to submit documentation to support the services provides OR failed to submit enough documentation to support the claim Other errors (i.e. submitted twice/paid twice) Government Reaction Fraud Prevention System (FPS) In place for over 2 years Outcome $3 for every $1 spent Generated leads for additional 536 new ZPICs FPS collaboration with law enforcement OIG involvement and issuance of SNF based Reports Overpayment Reviewers found SNFs incorrect coding to higher RUGs in 20% of claims 4

Government Reaction Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Questionable billing by SNFs. Conduct a full review of SNF billing by end of FY 2011 and implement plan. Increased diligence on therapy utilization. Increased auditing of supporting documentation. HHS 2014 and Proposed 2015Budget! CMS and OIG (a new kind of Marriage)! Current Healthcare Landscape Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Medicare Fraud http://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnproducts/downloads/fraud_and_abuse.pdf In general, fraud is defined as making false statements or representations of material facts to obtain some benefit or payment for which no entitlement would otherwise exist. These acts may be committed either for the person s own benefit or for the benefit of some other party. In other words, fraud includes the obtaining of something of value through misrepresentation or concealment of material facts. Examples of Medicare fraud may include: Knowingly billing for services that were not furnished and/or supplies not provided, including billing Medicare for appointments that the patient failed to keep; and Knowingly altering claims forms and/or receipts to receive a higher payment amount. 5

Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Medicare Abuse http://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnproducts/downloads/fraud_and_abuse.pdf Abuse describes practices that, either directly or indirectly, result in unnecessary costs to the Medicare Program. Abuse includes any practice that is not consistent with the goals of providing patients with services that are medically necessary, meet professionally recognized standards, and are fairly priced. Examples of Medicare abuse may include: Misusing codes on a claim, Charging excessively for services or supplies, and Billing for services that were not medically necessary. Both fraud and abuse can expose providers to criminal and civil liability. Fraud and Abuse Laws False Claims Act (FCA) The FCA (31 United States Code [U.S.C.] Sections 3729-3733) protects the Government from being overcharged or sold substandard goods or services. The FCA imposes civil liability on any person who knowingly submits, or causes to be submitted, a false or fraudulent claim to the Federal Government. The knowing standard includes acting in deliberate ignorance or reckless disregard of the truth related to the claim. https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud Anti-Kickback Statute The Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. Section 1320a-7b(b)) makes it a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive any remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services reimbursable by a Federal health care program. https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/safe-harbor-regulations Fraud and Abuse Laws Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs) Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1320a-7a, CMPs may be imposed for a variety of conduct, and different amounts of penalties and assessments may be authorized based on the type of violation at issue. Penalties range from up to $10,000 to $50,000 per violation. CMPs can also include an assessment of up to 3 times the amount claimed for each item or service, or up to 3 times the amount of remuneration offered, paid, solicited, or received. Examples of CMP violations include: Presenting a claim that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false and fraudulent, Presenting a claim that the person knows or should know is for an item or service for which payment may not be made, and Violating the Anti-Kickback Statute. 6

CMS Fraud and Abuse Partners Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Government agencies partner to fight fraud and abuse, uphold the Medicare Program s integrity, save and recoup taxpayer funds, and maintain health care costs and quality of care. CMS partners : Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs)/Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs); Medicare Drug Integrity Contractors (MEDICs); State and Federal law enforcement agencies, such as the OIG, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Justice (DOJ), and State Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs); CMS Fraud and Abuse Partners (continued): Medicare beneficiaries and caregivers; Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP) program; Physicians, suppliers, and other providers; Medicare Carriers, Fiscal Intermediaries (FIs), and Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) who pay claims and enroll providers and suppliers; Accreditation Organizations (AOs); Recovery Audit Program Recovery Auditors; and Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) Contractors. RAC Recovery Audit Contractors Medicare RACs Medicaid RACs ZPIC Zone Program Integrity Contractors PSC Program Safeguard Contractor MIC Medicaid Integrity Contractors MAC Medicare Administrative Contractor FI Fiscal Intermediary (now MAC) HEAT Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) 7

Healthcare Landscape Focus on Overpayment as well as Fraud and Abuse From: Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC Let s Take a Closer Look! MAC RAC ZPIC YOUR LOGO HERE 8

Medicare Administrative Contractor MAC Primary Role Primary contact for provider enrollment Part A and Part B FFS billing claims in a geographic region Replaced FIs Focus Medicare payment accuracy Recoveries and process 1 st level of appeals Additional Development Request (ADR) Reviews facility and professional claims related to a beneficiary Medicare Administrative Contractor MAC Scope Process claims Review claims, data, history, comparisons Audit claims Re Determination Requests Educate Provide Leads to next level of Audit Partners! Penalties Claim denials Referral to other audit partner Medicare Administrative Contractor MAC Appeals Process 1 st - Re determination by MAC 2 nd - Reconsideration by Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC) 3 rd Hearing by Administrative Law Judge 4 th Review by Medicare Appeals Court 5 th Judicial Review in Federal Court 9

Recovery Audit Contractor RAC Primary Role Independent collection agency Started in demonstration project, now permanent 1 primary contractor for each of 4 regions Improper Payment Identification and collection % for both overpayments and underpayments they correct Focus Medicare and Medicaid overpayments and underpayments Detect and correct past improper payments so MAC can recover overpayments and implement further actions Recovery Audit Contractor RAC Scope Apply statutes, regulations, CMS coverage/billing to make determinations 2 types Automated claims history review (no medical record review) Complex review (medical record review) Pre and /or Post Payment Look back up to 3 years after the date the claim was filed Recovery Audit Contractor RAC Penalties Medicare No penalties if provider agrees with RAC determination and pays back monies If miss deadline in appeals process, CMS can automatically recoup alleged overpayment 31 st day after receipt of initial demand letter Medicaid No penalties if provider agrees with RAC determination and pays back monies States have flexibility to decide penalty process 10

Recovery Audit Contractor RAC Appeals Medicare Mirrors the five level MAC appeals process Medicaid States have the flexibility to decide the structure of the appeals process Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Primary Role Fraud detection, prevention and correction Contracted payment, non contingent (no performance %) ZPICs combine Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs) and Medicare drug integrity contractors (MEDICs) ZPICs oversee all Medicare claims in their zone 7 ZPIC Zones Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) 11

Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Focus Medicare fraud, waste and abuse Identify fraud within service area review past and pending claims by investigation and audit Compare billings with similar providers NEVER random audit - if you are chosen there is a reason potential fraud ZPIC initial request is indication of scope of investigation! Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Scope Investigate Audit claims Authorized to initiate administrative sanctions Payment suspensions Determine overpayments returned Refer for exclusion form government health care programs Support and refer to LAW ENFORCEMENT Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Audit initiated by: Complaints OIG hotline, whistleblower, fraud alerts, direct to ZPIC Referral from MAC, RAC, beneficiary Data analysis LOS out of norm ZIPCs may Use a statistician Review small number of records to determine fraud Conduct interviews staff, beneficiaries, etc. 12

Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) Scope No specific look back periods Refer finding of fraud to law enforcement for civil, criminal, CMP, other administrative sanction Involve OIG and US Attorney offices Penalties Recoupment Civil and criminal action/sanctions Appeals Mirror 5 level Medicare appeal process YOUR LOGO HERE Proactive vs. Reactive Internal Review 13

Minimize Risk YOUR LOGO HERE Internal Review Minimize Risk! 1. Review internal processes Admission screening and assessment Nursing and Rehabilitation integration Medicare Meeting observation Medical Record Documentation Therapy logs Assess Staff knowledge and competency MDS Coordinator MDS succession planning IDT knowledge of RAI Internal Review Minimize Risk! 1. Review internal processes (continued) Claims error process MDS Coordinator process Business office Rehabilitation Adherence to RAI Manual Assessment Reference Date process OBRA scheduling ADL Tracking accuracy 14

Internal Review Minimize Risk! 1. Review internal processes (continued) Medical necessity CRITICAL!!! Ensure records accurately reflect care and services Consistent with clinical conditions Needs of a skilled professional Correlation between IDT MDS documentation per RAI and clinical documentation Accurate ADL s!!!! Internal Review Minimize Risk! 2. Self Audit High Risk Areas Accuracy of claims Variances high RUGs vs. facility demographics Sudden changes in billing Spikes in billing Compromised identities (provider/beneficiary) High error rates RUG changes or discrepancies Overpayments/underpayments Internal Review Minimize Risk! 2. Self Audit High Risk Areas (random audits) (continued) Medical necessity CRITICAL!!! Ensure records accurately reflect care and services Consistent with clinical conditions Needs of a skilled professional Correlation between IDT MDS documentation per RAI and clinical documentation Accurate ADL s!!!! 15

Internal Review Minimize Risk! 2. Self Audit High Risk Areas (continued) Physician orders support MDS sections Therapy Ancillaries Specialty services Certs Advanced Beneficiary Notices Rehabilitation Documentation Nursing and Rehabilitation 3. Triple Check Process 4. Update Policies and Procedures 5. Train staff Internal Review 6. Develop quality strategy for improvement Goals based off of internal review Prioritize Impact Systems and tools needed to change processes Resources applied or needed Time frames Approval/Agreement Proactive vs. Reactive Data Agenda 16

Data Agenda We are transforming Medicare from a passive payer, to an active purchaser of value Assistant CMS Administrator Quality Care + Data = Reimbursement Data Agenda One thing you can control to some degree is performance! 17

Data Agenda Organizational Data: The New Path to Value and Reimbursement! 1. Determine Quality Profile: Assess Organization Data 2. Review Internal Processes: Data Collection, Review and Response 3. Establish an Information Agenda for Planning Your data is key to positive outcomes! Data Agenda Organization Data used by Auditors MDS RUGs distribution Therapy Utilization Quality Measures Claims submissions Patterns of errors Spike in reimbursement Readmission/Discharge data Survey Results! 21 st Century Leadership Data Driven Decisions Understand what the real business question is. (Who, What, Why, When, How) Create an analysis plan with hypotheses. Collect or review the right data Gather insights Make recommendations Take action 18

Proactive vs. Reactive Preparedness and Protection Preparedness and Protection 1. Establish an Audit Response Team Compliance Officer/Lead Documentation Manager Administrator Director of Nursing Rehabilitation Director Business Office MDS Coordinator(s) Admission/Discharge Clinical, financial, legal expertise Determine Roles and Responsibilities Preparedness and Protection 2. Monitor MAC and Government trends www.oig.hhs.gov/reports/html www.cms.hhs.gov/rac www.cms.hhs.gove/zpic www.cms.hhs/gov/cert www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/Internet-Only-Manuals- IOMs-items/CMS019033.html 19

Preparedness and Protection 3. Audit Response Process Establish Timeframes and Response Reaction Track ALL Deadlines Prepare for large volume of requests Keep Complete record What requested Who sent When sent How sent Copies of all records and correspondence Communication point person Legal Counsel Preparedness and Protection 3. Corporate Compliance culture Established corporate compliance plan Updated and reviewed per requirements Staff trained» Orientation» Annually» As needed based upon monitoring activities Code of Conduct Adherence to Medicare and Medicaid requirements RAI manual/mds assessments/ard, etc. Documentation medical necessity Preparedness and Protection 3. Corporate Compliance culture External audits good faith for compliance! Contract outside organization to conduct external review of MDS/RAI process» Admission to discharge» Record accurately reflects care, services, coding and billing» Staff knowledge and adherence to requirements» Identification of opportunities for improvement On going training and professional growth 20

Proactive vs. Reactive Performance Improvement YOUR LOGO HERE 21

Performance Improvement Minimize Risk of Recoupments Proactive steps to ensure highest level of claim accuracy Leadership Monitoring Medical Necessity Admission/Discharge processes MDS Coding and Documentation Pre-bill screening process Denials and Appeals management Performance Improvement Minimize Risk of Recoupments Leadership Monitoring Track denied claims Review data leadership review big picture Look for patterns, trends Monitor Corporate Compliance processes and outcomes Focus on current/significant payment recoveries emerging from revenue audits Performance Improvement OIG and fraud, https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud OIG e-mail updates, https://oig.hhs.gov/contact-us CMS, http://www.cms.gov CMS Fraud Prevention Toolkit, which contains information for providers and information providers can give to beneficiaries, http://www.cms.gov/outreachand-education/outreach/partnerships/fraudpreventiontoolkit.html HEAT, http://www.stopmedicarefraud.gov/aboutfraud/heattaskforce CMS Electronic Mailing Lists, http://www.cms.gov/outreach-and- Education/Medicare-Learning-Network- MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/MailingLists_FactSheet.pdf Provider compliance educational materials, http://www.cms.gov/outreach-and- Education/Medicare-Learning-Network- MLN/MLNProducts/ProviderCompliance.html OIG Advisory Opinions, https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/advisoryopinions 22

Proactive vs. Reactive Approach Leadership Tactics for this changing Environment Education and Knowledge Internal Review Data Agenda Preparedness and Protection Performance Improvement Proactive vs. Reactive 23

Thank You! YOUR DATES HERE Lisa Thomson, Vice President Pathway Health www.pathwayhealth.com YOUR LOGO HERE 24