Research Article Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriasis: A Population-Based Analysis with Assessment of the Framingham Risk Score

Similar documents
Psoriasis Co-morbidities: Changing Clinical Practice. Theresa Schroeder Devere, MD Assistant Professor, OHSU Dermatology. Psoriatic Arthritis

Demonstration Study of Healthcare Utilization by Obese Patients. Joseph Vasey PhD Director, Epidemiology Quintiles Outcome May 22, 2013

11/8/2011. Administrative Definitions of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rising Prevalence Regardless of Definition Used. No Disclosures. Background.

DISCLOSURES RISK ASSESSMENT. Stroke and Heart Disease -Is there a Link Beyond Risk Factors? Daniel Lackland, MD

Main Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT

Cohort Studies. Sukon Kanchanaraksa, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Mortality Assessment Technology: A New Tool for Life Insurance Underwriting

The Widening Mortality Gap Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and the General Population

ADVANCE: a factorial randomised trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Research Article Inconsistencies Exist in National Estimates of Eye Care Services Utilization in the United States

Prognostic impact of uric acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Improving cardiometabolic health in Major Mental Illness

International Task Force for Prevention Of Coronary Heart Disease. Clinical management of risk factors. coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke

Research Article Prevalence of Provocative Seizures in Persons with Epilepsy: A Longitudinal Study at Khon Kaen University Hospital, Thailand

Clinical Study The Sweet Spot: Continued Search for the Glycemic Threshold for Macrovascular Disease A Retrospective Single Center Experience

Barriers to Healthcare Services for People with Mental Disorders. Cardiovascular disorders and diabetes in people with severe mental illness

Therapeutic Approach in Patients with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease

African Americans & Cardiovascular Diseases

The Canadian Association of Cardiac

Absolute cardiovascular disease risk assessment

Listen to your heart: Good Cardiovascular Health for Life

GP Symposium Dermatology Dr Seow Hoong Foo Dr Shireen Velangi March 6th 2014

MANAGEMENT OF LIPID DISORDERS: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW GUIDELINES

How To Treat Dyslipidemia

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Lipides, métabolisme des hydrates de carbonne et maladies cardio-vasculaires

High Blood Cholesterol

Journal Club: Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy by the AIM-HIGH Investigators

ROLE OF LDL CHOLESTEROL, HDL CHOLESTEROL AND TRIGLYCERIDES IN THE PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND STROKE

Malmö Preventive Project. Cardiovascular Endpoints

Osama Jarkas. in Chest Pain Patients. STUDENT NAME: Osama Jarkas DATE: August 10 th, 2015

Design and principal results

Assessing risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: new data from the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) study

EXPANDING THE EVIDENCE BASE IN OUTCOMES RESEARCH: USING LINKED ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS (EMR) AND CLAIMS DATA

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity

Summary Evaluation of the Medicare Lifestyle Modification Program Demonstration and the Medicare Cardiac Rehabilitation Benefit

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION

Use of Glycated Hemoglobin and Microalbuminuria in the Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus

Does referral from an emergency department to an. alcohol treatment center reduce subsequent. emergency room visits in patients with alcohol

Malmö Preventive Project. Cardiovascular Endpoints

New Cholesterol Guidelines: Carte Blanche for Statin Overuse Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

Psoriasis, Incidence, Quality of Life, Psoriatic Arthritis, Prevalence

Cardiovascular Endpoints

Cardiovascular disease physiology. Linda Lowe-Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century October 14, 2011

Type 1 Diabetes ( Juvenile Diabetes)

Diabetes and Heart Disease

Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Brief

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Principal Results

HeartScore Web - based version users guide TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1. Preamble Benefits of using HeartScore Accessing HeartScore...

Antiretroviral treatment is Associated with increased Arterial Stiffness in Sub- Saharan African HIV-1 Infected Patients: A cross- Sectional Study

Cardiac Rehabilitation: An Under-utilized Resource Making Patients Live Longer, Feel Better

HCIM ICD-10 Training Online Course Catalog August 2015

Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus

Quantifying Life expectancy in people with Type 2 diabetes

Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults. Learn and Live SM. ACCF/AHA Pocket Guideline

Scottish Diabetes Survey Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group

Protocol. Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Outpatient Setting

After acute myocardial infarction, diabetes CARDIAC OUTCOMES AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS

The WHI 12 Years Later: What Have We Learned about Postmenopausal HRT?

LIPID PANEL CHOLESTEROL LIPOPROTEIN, ELECTROPHORETIC SEPARATION LIPOPROTEIN, DIRECT MEASUREMENT (HDL) LDL DIRECT TRIGLYCERIDES

Role of Body Weight Reduction in Obesity-Associated Co-Morbidities

Achieving Quality and Value in Chronic Care Management

Statins and Risk for Diabetes Mellitus. Background

Correspondence should be addressed to Heinz-Jakob Langen;

Cardiac Rehabilitation An Underutilized Class I Treatment for Cardiovascular Disease

Obesity in the United States Workforce. Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) III and

Cardiovascular Endpoints

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP) DRAFT GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION

The ACC 50 th Annual Scientific Session

The Role of Insurance in Providing Access to Cardiac Care in Maryland. Samuel L. Brown, Ph.D. University of Baltimore College of Public Affairs

C-Reactive Protein and Diabetes: proving a negative, for a change?

MY TYPE 2 DIABETES NUMBERS

Metabolic Syndrome Overview: Easy Living, Bitter Harvest. Sabrina Gill MD MPH FRCPC Caroline Stigant MD FRCPC BC Nephrology Days, October 2007

ESC/EASD Pocket Guidelines Diabetes, pre-diabetes and cardiovascular disease

I. Current Cardiac Rehabilitation Requirements

A Population Based Risk Algorithm for the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: in the United States

The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study I: 12-Year Followup

BMC Med 7/19/2007; Simvastatin linked to reduced incidence of dementia, Parkinson s disease.

RAW PREVALENCE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND AS AT 31 MARCH 2014

Clinical Research on Lifestyle Interventions to Treat Obesity and Asthma in Primary Care Jun Ma, M.D., Ph.D.

A Multi-locus Genetic Risk Score for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Meaningful Use: Registration, Attestation, Workflow Tips and Tricks

6/5/2014. Objectives. Acute Coronary Syndromes. Epidemiology. Epidemiology. Epidemiology and Health Care Impact Pathophysiology

Fewer people with coronary heart disease are being diagnosed as compared to the expected figures.

What is Vascular Surgery Worth to a Health Care System?

Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Million Hearts Clinical Quality Measures Dashboard

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT)

Research Skills for Non-Researchers: Using Electronic Health Data and Other Existing Data Resources

The association between health risk status and health care costs among the membership of an Australian health plan

Shared care protocol for the management of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

Selected Health Status Indicators DALLAS COUNTY. Jointly produced to assist those seeking to improve health care in rural Alabama

CARDIAC CARE. Giving you every advantage

Your healthcare provider has ordered a Boston Heart Cardiac Risk Assessment

Scottish Diabetes Survey Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group

Research Article Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration in Pediatric Workers and Undergraduate Medical/Nursing Students

Nutrition. Type 2 Diabetes: A Growing Challenge in the Healthcare Setting NAME OF STUDENT

Elenco dei periodici elettronici in Ovid Full text

Population Health Management Program

PRECOMBAT Trial. Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators

Transcription:

Scientifica Volume 2013, Article ID 371569, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/371569 Research Article Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriasis: A Population-Based Analysis with Assessment of the Framingham Risk Score Elena Myasoedova, 1,2 Bharath Manu Akkara Veetil, 1 Eric L. Matteson, 1,2 Hilal Maradit Kremers, 2 Marian T. McEvoy, 3 and Cynthia S. Crowson 1,2 1 Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 3 Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia S. Crowson; crowson@mayo.edu Received 18 December 2012; Accepted 7 January 2013 Academic Editors: B. Z. Simkhovich and U. Tursen Copyright 2013 Elena Myasoedova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Objective. To examine the utility of the Framingham risk score (FRS) in estimating cardiovascular risk in psoriasis. Methods. We compared the predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular events, namely, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting using the FRS, to the observed risk of cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort of patients with psoriasis. Patients with incident or prevalent adult-onset psoriasis aged 30 79 years without prior history of cardiovascular disease were included. Results. Among the 1197 patients with predicted risk scores, the median FRS was 6.0%, while the observed 10-year cardiovascular risk was 6.9% (standardized incidence ratio (SIR): 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92 1.42). The SIR was not elevated for women nor for men. The differences between observed and predicted cardiovascular risks in patients <60 years (SIR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.73 1.41) or 60 years (SIR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.95 1.68) were notstatistically significant. Conclusion. There was no apparent difference between observed and predicted cardiovascular risks in patients with psoriasis in our study. FRS reasonably estimated cardiovascular risk in both men and women as well as in younger and older psoriasis patients, suggesting that FRS can be used in risk stratification in psoriasis without further adjustment. 1. Introduction There is increasing interest in cardiovascular implications of chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis [1]. Epidemiologic observations have demonstrated increased rates of cardiovascular events in patients with psoriasis [2, 3]. Some studies suggested that psoriasis itself may be an independent cardiovascular risk factor [4, 5], while others did not support this finding [6]. It is unclear whether cardiovascular risk in psoriasis is increased beyond that conferred by traditional cardiovascular risk factors and whether traditional risk assessment tools such as the Framingham risk score (FRS) are useful for cardiovascular risk stratification in psoriasis. We aimed to examine the utility of the FRS in estimating cardiovascular risk in psoriasis. 2. Materials and Methods This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Rochester epidemiology project (REP), a medical records linkage system containing complete inpatient and outpatient records from all healthcare providers in Olmsted County,Minnesota.TheuniquefeaturesoftheREPwere described previously [7]. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Center. Using the REP resources, we identified all Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents aged 30 79 years with diagnostic codes consistent with psoriasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 696.1,

2 Scientifica 696.2, 696.8, 696.5, and 696.3) between 01-01-1998 and 01-01- 2008 [8]. Psoriasis was validated by a confirmatory diagnosis of dermatologist or a physician s description of the lesions in the medical record or a skin biopsy. Doubtful diagnoses were resolved by the dermatologist coinvestigator. The study included patients with incident or prevalent adult-onset psoriasis in 1998 2007. The psoriasis incidence date of incident subjects and the prevalence date for prevalent subjects (i.e., first mention of psoriasis during the study period) are further referred to as the baseline. The entire inpatient and outpatient medical records of each patient were reviewed by trained nurse abstractors, beginning with the subjects records at age 18 years or date of migration to Olmsted County until the death, migration, or end of the study (12-31-2010). Data were collected on cardiovascular events, namely, all hospitalized myocardial infarctions, revascularization procedures (i.e., coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous interventions), heart failure, and cardiovascular deaths throughout the followup. All subjects (irrespective of residency status) were tracked nationally for vital status; death certificates were obtained fromtherespectivestatesforsubjectswhodiedoutside Minnesota. The underlying cause of death was coded from national mortality statistics, and cardiovascular death was defined as ICD-9 codes 390 459 and ICD-10 codes I00 I99 [9]. Systemic medication use included methotrexate, oral retinoids, cyclosporin, sulfasalazine, hydroxyurea, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab. Any use of these medications prior to baseline and during followup was considered. Data on cardiovascular risk factors at baseline, namely, smoking, blood pressure measures, use of antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering medications, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes mellitus, were collected as were the results of all fasting clinically performed serum lipid measures. For blood pressure, the recorded value closest to baseline ±1 year was used to calculate the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Forlipids,therecordedvalueclosesttobaseline±2 years was used, since guidelines recommend measurement of lipids every 5 years. The 10-year FRS for general CVD, which includes cardiovasculareventsofmyocardialinfarction,cardiovascular death, angina, stroke, intermittent claudication, and heart failure, was calculated [10]. For those without lipid values, we instead applied the office-based 10-year FRS which does notrequirelaboratoryvaluesforcalculationofthefrs. Since information on stroke and intermittent claudication was not collected in our study, the FRS was recalibrated to the subset of cardiovascular events collected in our population using calibration coefficients provided with the published algorithm [10]. To facilitate comparison of the predicted 10-year FRS with the observed CVD risk, the observed followup was truncated at 10 years after baseline. For patients with <10 years of followup, the predicted CVD risk was adjusted proportionately. Poisson regression models were used to obtain the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), that is, the ratio of the observed CVD in psoriasis to the FRS-predicted CVD rates. Subgroup analyses were performed by sex, age group, and exposure to systemic therapy. For the analysis of systemic therapy, patients contributed person-years of followup to the unexposed analysis until they were exposed to systemic therapy when they were moved to the systemic therapy group. An additional analysis where patients were censored at diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis was also performed. 3. Results The study population included 1421 patients with incident (n = 480) or prevalent (n = 941) adult-onset psoriasis without prior CVD. Of these, 1197 (84%) patients had complete risk factor data to compute FRS, and 82 patients developed CVD during a mean followup of 8.1 years. Of the remaining 224 patients without FRS, 8 patients developed CVD during a mean followup of 7.1 years. Patients with complete information for FRS were compared to those without enough information (Table 1). For those with FRS, the predicted median 10-year FRS was 6.0% (min: 0.0%, max: 72.1%). The observed 10-year CVD risk was 6.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.8%, 12%). The CVD rate was marginally lower in those without FRS (observed 10-year risk: 3.6%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 6.0%, log rank P = 0.084). In 82 patients who developed CVD, 71.7 CVD events were predicted by the FRS (SIR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.42; Table 2). The SIR was not significantly elevated for women or men. The SIR was similar in both age groups, as well as among patients using systemic therapy (Table 2). The results regarding systemic therapy remained unchanged when patients who were diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (35 patients, 18%) were censored at diagnosis (SIR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.62, 2.02). 4. Discussion Given the mounting evidence of increased CVD risk in psoriasis, it is all more important to assess whether cardiovascular risk assessment tools such as the FRS are useful for evaluating CVD risk in these patients. This study is among thefirsttoassessthefrsinapopulation-basedcohortof patients with psoriasis. We found no apparent difference in the observed versus FRS-predicted 10-year CVD risk. The SIR was not significantly elevated for men or women and was similar across the age groups. This finding is in agreement with some prior studies [6, 11] and in contrast to other reports that show an excess of CVD in psoriasis [2, 12]. Some studies emphasize that the risk is greatest in younger patients (<60 years) and in patients with early-onset and longstanding psoriasis, presumably due to the fairly chronic course of the inflammatory process and cumulative disease burden perpetuating atherosclerotic disease [2, 3]. We found no apparent differences between the observed and predicted CVD risks for patients aged <60 years, which supports the findings of some investigators [13]. It has been suggested that increased cardiovascular risk in psoriasis is confined to patients with severe disease [14, 15]. Shared genetic mechanisms for the risk of psoriasis, in particular severe psoriasis, and increased cardiovascular risk have been described, including apolipoprotein E gene

Scientifica 3 Table 1: Characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors of patients with psoriasis and no prior cardiovascular disease. Comparison of patients with enough information to compute the Framingham risk score (FRS) to those without enough information for the FRS. Characteristic n Patients without FRS n Patients with FRS P value Prevalent psoriasis 224 149 (67%) 1197 792 (66%) 0.92 Age, years 224 45.0 ± 12 1197 51.3± 13 <0.001 Male sex 224 150 (67%) 1197 565 (47%) <0.001 Systolic blood pressure, mmhg 76 130.0 ± 13.1 1155 130.6 ± 12.7 0.78 Diastolic blood pressure, mmhg 40 78.1 ± 11.3 781 77.5 ± 11.1 0.50 Use of antihypertensive medications 224 1 (0%) 1197 225 (19%) <0.001 Current smoking 224 38 (17%) 1197 190 (16%) 0.68 Diabetes mellitus 224 8 (4%) 1197 172 (14%) <0.001 Body mass index, kg/m 2 0 1080 28.6 ± 6.4 Use of lipid-lowering medications 224 0 (0%) 1197 125 (12%) <0.001 Any systemic treatment 224 36 (16%) 1197 162 (14%) 0.31 Total cholesterol, mg/dl 36 220.3 ± 40.8 968 205.7 ± 35.1 0.032 LDL, mg/dl 34 138.0 ± 39.0 957 120.3 ± 34.8 0.005 HDL, mg/dl 34 46.2 ± 7.1 958 49.9 ± 8.3 0.019 Triglyceride values, mg/dl 15 196.9 ± 96.9 688 165.9 ± 110.2 0.11 Values in the table are n (%)ormean± SD. LDL: low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein; SD: standard deviation. Table 2: Comparison of observed and FRS-predicted CVD risk in patients with psoriasis. Group Number of patients CVD events Observed FRS-predicted SIR (95% CI) Total 1197 82 71.7 1.14 (0.92, 1.42) Female 632 33 25.7 1.28 (0.92, 1.79) Male 565 49 45.9 1.07 (0.81, 1.41) Age <60 years 879 34 33.5 1.01 (0.73, 1.41) 60+ years 318 48 38.1 1.26 (0.95, 1.68) No systemic treatment 1364 71 61.8 1.15 (0.91, 1.45) Any systemic treatment 198 11 9.8 1.12 (0.62, 2.03) FRS: Framingham risk score; CVD: cardiovascular disease; SIR: standardized incident ratio; CI: confidence interval. polymorphism [16 18]. However, severe psoriasis was found to be a risk factor for CVD in some studies [19] butnotin others [11]. Using systemic therapy as a proxy for severity, we did not find apparent difference in the observed versus predicted CVD rate. This is in line with our earlier findings where systemic treatment was not significantly associated with CVD occurrence in psoriasis after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors [20]. Of note, the prevalence of severe psoriasis in population-based studies is very low [21]. Patients with severe psoriasis with increased CVD risk beyond that accounted for by the FRS likely constitute a very small percentage of patients (16% in our cohort), and this could account for the lack of difference between observed and predicted CVD risks in our study. Strengths of this study include the longitudinal population-based design and the use of the unique REP resources. Limitations include insufficient statistical power in some subgroup analyses, in particular, analyses examining the risk among patients who received systemic treatment. These results should be interpreted with caution. Data on stroke and intermittent claudication were not available. However, calibration coefficients were applied to recalibrate the FRS to the subset of CVD events in our population which we believe minimizes this weakness. Information regarding disease severity was not available. However, we used systemic therapy as a surrogate in order to, at least in part, account for this limitation. There was no comparison cohort without psoriasis to validate the FRS accuracy in our population. However, we have previously shown that FRS accurately predicted CVD events in Olmsted County residents without rheumatoid arthritis [22]. Considering a low prevalence (<1%) of rheumatoid arthritis, we believe this analysis validates the FRS in our community. Also, other investigators using crosssectional data have demonstrated the utility of the FRS in psoriasis [12, 23]. Finally,thepopulationof Olmsted County, Minnesota, is predominantly White; thus, results may not be generalizabletonon-whitesubjects. In conclusion, the FRS reasonably estimates CVD risk in both men and women as well as in younger (<60 years) and older ( 60 years) patients with psoriasis and can be

4 Scientifica used in risk stratification in psoriasis without any further adjustment. Psoriasis did not appear to be an independent risk factor for CVD in our study. More studies are needed to better understand the nature of CVD in psoriasis and to develop effective strategies for CVD prevention in patients with psoriasis. Acknowledgment This work was partially funded by a grant from Pfizer and was made possible by a grant from Amgen/Wyeth and by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (R01 AG034676 from the National Institute on Aging). References [1] N. N. Mehta, R. S. Azfar, D. B. Shin, A. L. Neimann, A. B. Troxel, and J. M. Gelfand, Patients with severe psoriasis are at increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: cohort study using the general practice research database, European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1000 1006, 2010. [2] J. M. Gelfand, A. L. Neimann, D. B. Shin, X. Wang, D. J. Margolis, and A. B. Troxel, Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis, JournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,vol. 296, no. 14, pp. 1735 1741, 2006. [3] W. Q. Li, J. L. Han, J. E. Manson et al., Psoriasis and risk of nonfatal cardiovascular disease in U.S. women: a cohort study, British Dermatology,vol.166,no.4,pp.811 818,2012. [4] A.W.Armstrong,C.T.Harskamp,L.Ledo,J.H.Rogers,and E. J. Armstrong, Coronary artery disease in patients with psoriasis referred for coronary angiography, American Journal of Cardiology,vol.109,no.7,pp.976 980,2012. [5] S.Prodanovich,R.S.Kirsner,J.D.Kravetz,F.Ma,L.Martinez, and D. G. Federman, Association of psoriasis with coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular diseases and mortality, Archives of Dermatology, vol. 145, no.6, pp. 700 703, 2009. [6] M. Wakkee, R. M. C. Herings, and T. Nijsten, Psoriasis may not be an independent risk factor for acute ischemic heart disease hospitalizations: results of a large population-based dutch cohort, Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 962 967, 2010. [7]H.M.Kremers,E.Myasoedova,C.S.Crowson,G.Savova, S. E. Gabriel, and E. L. Matteson, The Rochester Epidemiology Project: exploiting the capabilities for population-based research in rheumatic diseases, Rheumatology,vol.50, no.1,pp. 6 15, 2011. [8] M.Icen,C.S.Crowson,M.T.McEvoy,F.J.Dann,S.E.Gabriel, and H. Maradit Kremers, Trends in incidence of adult-onset psoriasis over three decades: a population-based study, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology,vol.60,no.3,pp.394 401, 2009. [9] Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2005 Update American Heart Association, 2006. [10] R. B. D Agostino, R. S. Vasan, M. J. Pencina et al., General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study, Circulation, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 743 753, 2008. [11] R. S. Stern and A. Huibregtse, Very severe psoriasis is associated with increased noncardiovascular mortality but not with increased cardiovascular risk, Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1159 1166, 2011. [12]P.Gisondi,S.Farina,M.V.Giordano,andG.Girolomoni, Usefulness of the framingham risk score in patients with chronic psoriasis, AmericanJournalofCardiology, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 1754 1757, 2010. [13]M.Wakkee,R.M.C.Herings,andT.Nijsten, Psoriasismay not be an independent risk factor for acute ischemic heart disease hospitalizations: results of a large population-based dutch cohort, Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 962 967, 2010. [14] L.Mallbris,O.Akre,F.Granathetal., Increasedriskforcardiovascular mortality in psoriasis inpatients but not in outpatients, European Epidemiology, vol.19,no.3,pp.225 230, 2004. [15]A.W.Armstrong,C.Schupp,andB.Bebo, Psoriasiscomorbidities: results from the national psoriasis foundation surveys 2003 to 2011, Dermatology,vol.225,no.2,pp.121 126,2012. [16] P. Coto-Segura, E. Coto, V. Alvarez et al., Apolipoprotein ε4 allele is associated with psoriasis severity, Archives of Dermatological Research,vol.302,no.2,pp.145 149,2010. [17] E. Campalani, M. H. Allen, D. Fairhurst et al., Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms are associated with psoriasis but do not determine disease response to acitretin, British Dermatology,vol.154,no.2,pp.345 352,2006. [18] Y. Han, T. Liu, and L. Lu, Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism in psoriasis: a meta-analysis, Archives of Medical Research. In press. [19] N. N. Mehta, Y. Yu, R. Pinnelas et al., Attributable risk estimate of severe psoriasis on major cardiovascular events, American Medicine,vol.124,no.8,pp.775.e1 775.e6,2011. [20] H. Maradit-Kremers, M. Icen, F. C. Ernste, R. A. Dierkhising, and M. T. McEvoy, Disease severity and therapy as predictors of cardiovascular risk in psoriasis: a population-based cohort study, JournaloftheEuropeanAcademyofDermatologyand Venereology,vol.26,no.3,pp.336 343,2012. [21] R. S. Stern, Psoriasis is not a useful independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, Investigative Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 917 919, 2010. [22] C.S.Crowson,E.L.Matteson,V.L.Roger,T.M.Therneau,and S. E. Gabriel, Usefulness of risk scores to estimate the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, American Cardiology, vol.110,no.3,pp.420 424, 2012. [23] A. B. Kimball, A. Guerin, D. Latremouille-Viau et al., Coronary heart disease and stroke risk in patients with psoriasis: retrospective analysis, American Medicine, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 350 357, 2010.

MEDIATORS of INFLAMMATION The Scientific World Journal Gastroenterology Research and Practice Diabetes Research International Endocrinology Immunology Research Disease Markers Submit your manuscripts at BioMed Research International PPAR Research Obesity Ophthalmology Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Stem Cells International Oncology Parkinson s Disease Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine AIDS Behavioural Neurology Research and Treatment Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity